Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2016 Jun 20;18(13):3158–3161. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01373

Synthesis and Reactivity of Triazaphenanthrenes

Sarah Fernandez , Maximilian A Ganiek , Mariia Karpacheva , Fabian C Hanusch †,, Stephan Reuter †,, Thomas Bein †,, Florian Auras †,, Paul Knochel †,*
PMCID: PMC5291649  PMID: 27321707

Abstract

graphic file with name ol-2016-01373j_0009.jpg

Pyridonaphthyridines (triazaphenanthrenes) were prepared in 4 steps and in 13–52% overall yield using Negishi cross-couplings between iodopicolines and 2-chloro-pyridylzinc derivatives. After chlorination, Gabriel amination and spontaneous ring-closure, the final aromatization leading to the triazaphenanthrenes was achieved with chloranil. This heterocyclic scaffold underwent a nucleophilic addition at position 6 leading to further functionalized pyridonaphthyridines. The influence of these chemical modifications on the optical properties was studied by steady-state and time-resolved optical spectroscopy. While the thiophene-substituted heterocycles exhibited the most extended absorption, the phenyl- and furan-substituted compounds showed a stronger photoluminescence, reaching above 20% quantum yield and lifetimes of several nanoseconds.


Six-membered N-heterocyclic molecules have found numerous applications due to their biological or physical properties.1 Especially a number of privileged ring systems have been extensively studied (e.g., pyridines,2 quinolines,3 isoquinolines,4 acridines,5 or diazines6). Annelated six-membered N-heteroaromatics bearing one nitrogen atom per ring (Figure 1), such as naphthyridines (1)7 are much less studied, and the corresponding triazaanthracenes (2)8 and triazaphenanthrenes (3)9 are almost unknown.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Fused six-membered N-heteroaromatics.

Due to the potential applications of triazaphenanthrenes derived from 3, we became interested in a general synthesis of such heterocycles using a Negishi cross-coupling10 with polyfunctional zinc intermediates. Herein, we report a straightforward synthesis of pyridonaphthyridines of type 4, as well as further functionalizations of these new triazaphenanthrenes.

We have envisioned a retrosynthesis involving an intramolecular N-arylation of the bis-pyridine as final ring closure (5), possibly catalyzed by transition metals.11 The aminopyridine (5) would be readily prepared from the bis-pyridine (6) by selective halogenation and amination of the methyl substituent. This polyfunctional bis-pyridine (6) would be available by a Negishi cross-coupling of the 3-zincated 2-chloropyridine (7) with the 3-halogenated 2-picoline (8; Scheme 1).

Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis.

Scheme 1

The polyfunctional zinc reagents of type 7 derived from the retrosynthetic analysis were prepared from the corresponding 3-bromo-2-chloropyridines (9ac) by a bromine/magnesium exchange using i-PrMgCl·LiCl12 followed by transmetalation with ZnCl2. These pyridylzinc reagents underwent a Negishi cross-coupling with the iodopicolines (8ab) in THF in the presence of 2% Pd(PPh3)4.13,14 The cross-coupling reactions were usually complete within 1–5 h at 50 °C. As expected, the presence of electron-withdrawing substituents on the pyridylzinc reagents (7) significantly lowered the cross-coupling efficiency (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2. Negishi Cross-Coupling Towards the Synthesis of the Bis-pyridines (6ac).

Scheme 2

For the introduction of an amino function, we chose to convert the 2-methyl substituent into a chloromethyl group, followed by a Gabriel reaction.15 This chlorination was achieved by two methods. The most convenient procedure consisted of the treatment of the bis-pyridines (6ab) with trichloroisocyanuric acid in chloroform in the presence of 3% PhCONH2 (60 °C, 4–12 h), leading to the chloromethyl bis-pyridines (10ab) in 78–81% yield.16 This electrophilic substitution did not proceed if the methyl substituent was attached to a pyridyl ring bearing an electron-withdrawing chlorine substituent. In this case, we prepared the intermediate trimethylsilylmethyl derivative (11) by deprotonation with LDA (1.2 equiv, −78 °C, 2 h), followed by trapping with TMSCl. This silyl intermediate (11) was smoothly chlorinated by the method of Fraser,17 using C2Cl6 and CsF in acetonitrile (reflux, 3 h), affording the chloromethyl derivative (10c) in 62% yield (Scheme 3).

Scheme 3. Chlorination of the Picolyl Derivatives (6ac).

Scheme 3

Gabriel reaction using potassium phthalimide (DMF, 100 °C, 2–5 h) provided the phthalimides (12ac) in 69–92% yield.15 To our delight, deprotection of the phthalimides (12ac) using hydrazine hydrate in ethanol gave aminomethyl intermediates of type 5, which underwent a spontaneous ring closure under the reaction conditions, providing the dihydrotriazaphenanthrenes (13ac). Treatment with chloranil in DMF (25 °C, 2 h) led to the aromatized target molecules (4ac) in 75–89% yield; Scheme 4.

Scheme 4. Gabriel Substitution and Corresponding Deprotection Leading to the Azaphenanthrenes (4ac).

Scheme 4

Having these new N-heterocycles in hand, we studied their functionalization.18 However, metalations using various TMP-bases (TMPLi, TMP2Mg·2LiCl, TMPMgCl·LiCl, TMP2Zn·2LiCl, TMPZnCl·LiCl)19 or additions of organomagnesium compounds led to complex mixtures. In contrast, the treatment of 4a with a range of organolithium reagents at −60 °C for 0.5 h led to smooth addition, and after rearomatization with chloranil (DMF, 25 °C), the functionalized triazaphenanthrenes (4dm) were obtained in 34–93% yield (Table 1). A range of aryllithium reagents (14ad) bearing electron-donating (14b) and withdrawing groups (14cd) reacted well with 4a, leading to the azaphenanthrenes (4dg) in 62–93% yields after rearomatization (entries 1–4). Also, heterocyclic lithium derivatives smoothly added to the pyridonaphthyridine (4a). Thus, 2-lithiofuran (14e), 2-lithiothiophene (14f), as well as 2-lithiobenzofuran (14g) and 2-lithiobenzothiophene (14h) led to azaphenanthrenes (4hk) in 32–80% yield (entries 5–8). Interestingly, 1-lithio-1-ethoxyethene20 (14i) reacted well with 4a under these reaction conditions, and the keto-azaphenanthrene derivative (4l) was produced in 90% yield (entry 9). Surprisingly, alkyllithium reagents such as n-BuLi (14j) underwent a similar addition on the azaphenanthrene core without concurrent metalation, affording the butyl-substituted azaphenanthrene (4m) in 76% yield (entry 10).

Table 1. Functionalization of Azaphenanthrene (4a) with Organolithium Reagents of Type 14 Leading to Substituted Pyridonaphthyridines (4dm).

graphic file with name ol-2016-01373j_0007.jpg

graphic file with name ol-2016-01373j_0008.jpg

a

Isolated yields after purification by flash column chromatography.

We noted that depending on the substituent the color of the new pyridonaphthyridines ranges from almost colorless (4a, 4d) to intense yellow (4k). As the observable optical transitions allow for insights into the electronic structure and are of key importance for a potential application of the newly synthesized materials as dyes or molecular semiconductors, we analyzed the optical properties using steady-state and time-resolved spectroscopic methods.

The UV–vis spectra of 4a, 4d, and 4hk exhibit a distinct vibrational fine structure with a double-peak close to the absorption edge (Figure 2a and SI, Figure S1). These spectral features are sharpest for the particularly rigid molecules 4a, 4h, and 4j and appear more broadened for the thiophene-containing compounds 4i and 4k. The overall shape of the spectra close to the absorption edge, however, is very similar among all six compounds, indicating a similar electronic structure close to the frontier molecular orbitals. While the bare azaphenanthrene 4a absorbs light only at wavelengths below 350 nm, the absorption onset of the substituted pyridonaphthyridines is red-shifted as the conjugated π-system is extended.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Optical absorption spectra of the parent azaphenanthrene 4a and the furan- and benzofuran-substituted compounds 4h and 4j. For clarity the spectra were normalized to the low-energy double peak absorption feature. (b) The corresponding photoluminescence (PL) spectra measured with 300 nm (4a) and 365 nm excitation (4h, j). (c,d) Time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) traces of 4h and 4j, respectively. The instrument response function is displayed in gray.

Upon photoexcitation with UV light the compounds emit strongly in the 400–450 nm range (Figure 2b and SI, Figure S2). While the emission maximum seems almost not affected by the selection of the substituent, the photoluminescence quantum yield (PLQY) reveals differences between the differently substituted compounds. The highest PLQY of 23% was observed for 4d (SI, Table S1). Also, the furan-containing 4h and 4j exhibit decent quantum yields of above 10%, whereas the thiophene-based analogues 4i and 4k show only moderate PLQYs. Systematically lower quantum yields for sulfur-containing heterocycles compared to their oxygen analogues have also been observed for quinoxaline derivatives.21 These differences might result from a competing nonradiative deactivation mechanism that is more pronounced for the sulfur-containing heterocycles.

In order to analyze these differences in more detail, we studied the PL decay of the furan- and thiophene-containing compounds via time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) experiments. All four materials exhibit biexponential decay curves with the lifetimes being significantly longer for the furan compounds (Figure 2c,d and SI, Figure S3). In particular, the shorter-lived decay component τ1 was found to be about double compared to the thiophene analogues. This observation further supports the existence of a competing decay mechanism that is more dominant for the thiophene compounds.

In conclusion, we have developed a short 4-step synthesis of triazaphenanthrenes and have shown that these heterocycles undergo smooth addition-rearomatization at position 6 with various lithium reagents. The optical properties of these molecules can be tuned via the selection of the substituent. Strongly fluorescent molecules with long excited state lifetimes were obtained for furan-substituted derivatives, whereas the incorporation of a thienyl moiety resulted in an extended absorption range.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Chiara Marelli (Boehringer Ingelheim, Milan), Johanna Frey (LMU Munich), and Adrian Müller-Deku (LMU Munich) for their work in preliminary experiments. We also thank Rockwood Lithium GmbH (Frankfurt) and BASF AG (Ludwigshafen) for the generous gift of chemicals. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 321339.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01373.

  • Detailed experimental procedures and characterization data for new compounds (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol6b01373_si_001.pdf (2.7MB, pdf)

References

  1. a Chinchilla R.; Nájera C.; Yus M. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 2667. 10.1021/cr020101a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Alvarez-Builla J.; Vaquero J. J.; Barluenga J., Eds. Modern Heterocyclic Chemistry; Wiley: Weinheim, 2011. [Google Scholar]; c Vo C.-V. T.; Bode J. W. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 2809. 10.1021/jo5001252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. a Henry G. D. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6043. 10.1016/j.tet.2004.04.043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Hill M. D. Chem. - Eur. J. 2010, 16, 12052. 10.1002/chem.201001100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Kishbaugh T. L. S. Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2012, 24, 343. 10.1016/B978-0-08-096807-0.00012-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Allais C.; Grassot J.-M.; Rodriguez J.; Constantieux T. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 10829. 10.1021/cr500099b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. a Ahmad N. M.; Li J. J. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 2003, 84, 1. 10.1016/S0065-2725(03)84001-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Michael J. P. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2005, 22, 627. 10.1039/b413750g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Yamashkin S. A.; Oreshkina E. A. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2006, 42, 701. 10.1007/s10593-006-0150-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Khusnutdinov R. I.; Bayguzina A. R.; Dzhemilev U. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2014, 768, 75. 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Mao Y.; Zhu C.; Kong Z.; Wang J.; Zhu G.; Ren X. Synthesis 2015, 47, 3133. 10.1055/s-0035-1560471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; f Liu Y.-R.; Tu H.-Y.; Zhang X.-G. Synthesis 2015, 47, 3460. 10.1055/s-0034-1378810. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. a Badia D.; Carrillo L.; Dominguez E.; Tellitu I. Recent Res. Dev. Org. Chem. 1998, 2, 359. [Google Scholar]; b He R.; Huang Z.-T.; Zheng Q.-Y.; Wang C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2014, 55, 5705. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.08.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Belmont P.; Bosson J.; Godet T.; Tiano M. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 139. 10.2174/187152007780058669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Kumar R.; Kaur M.; Kumari M. Acta Polym. Pharm. 2012, 69, 3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. a Yet L. Prog. Heterocycl. Chem. 2012, 24, 393. 10.1016/B978-0-08-096807-0.00013-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Lassagne F.; Chevallier F.; Roisnel T.; Dorcet V.; Mongin F.; Domingo L. R. Synthesis 2015, 47, 2680. 10.1055/s-0034-1380678. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Biitseva A. V.; Rudenko I. V.; Hordiyenko O. V.; Omelchenko I. V.; Arrault A. Synthesis 2015, 47, 3733. 10.1055/s-0035-1560184. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. a Allen C. F. H. Chem. Rev. 1950, 47, 275. 10.1021/cr60147a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Paudler W. W.; Kress T. J. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 832. 10.1021/jo01278a078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Litvinov V. P. Russ. Chem. Rev. 2004, 73, 637. 10.1070/RC2004v073n07ABEH000856. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Egea J.; de los Rios C. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 2807. 10.2174/156802611798184418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Greiner R.; Blanc R.; Petermayer C.; Karaghiosoff K.; Knochel P. Synlett 2016, 27, 231. 10.1055/s-0035-1560703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. a Carboni S.; Da Settimo A.; Tonetti I. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1970, 7, 875. 10.1002/jhet.5570070420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Winkler M.; Houk K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1805. 10.1021/ja067087u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. a Case F. H.; Brennan J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 6297. 10.1021/ja01532a046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Czuba W. Rocz. Chem. 1967, 41, 289. [Google Scholar]; c Hamada Y.; Sato M.; Takeuchi I. Yakugaku Zasshi 1975, 95, 1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Nutaitis C. F.; Brennan M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2004, 36, 367. 10.1080/00304940409458681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; e Cailly T.; Fabis F.; Legay R.; Oulyadi H.; Rault S. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 71. 10.1016/j.tet.2006.10.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. a Miyaura N., Ed. Cross-Coupling reactions. A Practical Guide; Springer: Berlin, 2002. [Google Scholar]; b de Meijere A., Diederich F., Eds. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions; Wiley: Weinheim, 2004. [Google Scholar]; c Negishi E.-i. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6738. 10.1002/anie.201101380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Cossy J., Arseniyadis S., Eds. Modern Tools for the Synthesis of Complex Bioactive Molecules; Wiley: Weinheim, 2012. [Google Scholar]; e Heravi M. M.; Hashemi E.; Nazari N. Mol. Diversity 2014, 18, 441. 10.1007/s11030-014-9510-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Thapa S.; Vangala A. S.; Giri R. Synthesis 2016, 48, 504. 10.1055/s-0035-1560397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; g Haas D.; Hammann J. M.; Greiner R.; Knochel P. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 1540. 10.1021/acscatal.5b02718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. a Yang B. H.; Buchwald S. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 125. 10.1016/S0022-328X(98)01054-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Taillefer M.; Xia N.; Ouali A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 934. 10.1002/anie.200603173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Correa A.; Garcia Mancheno O.; Bolm C. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1108. 10.1039/b801794h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Guo D.; Huang H.; Xu J.; Jiang H.; Liu H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 4513. 10.1021/ol801784a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e Surry D. S.; Buchwald S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6338. 10.1002/anie.200800497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Monnier F.; Taillefer M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6954. 10.1002/anie.200804497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g Maiti D.; Fors B. P.; Henderson J. L.; Nakamura Y.; Buchwald S. L. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 57. 10.1039/C0SC00330A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h Surry D. S.; Buchwald S. L. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 27. 10.1039/C0SC00331J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i Corpet M.; Gosmini C. Synthesis 2014, 46, 2258. 10.1055/s-0034-1378373. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; j Steib A. K.; Fernandez S.; Kuzmina O. M.; Corpet M.; Gosmini C.; Knochel P. Synlett 2015, 26, 1049. 10.1055/s-0034-1380178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. a Barl N. M.; Werner V.; Saemann C.; Knochel P. Heterocycles 2014, 88, 827. 10.3987/REV-13-SR(S)4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Li-Yuan Bao R.; Zhao R.; Shi L. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 6884. 10.1039/C4CC10194D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. We have screened a number of catalyst systems, and Pd(PPh3)4 gave the best results in most cases. However, for the cross-coupling of 7a with 8b, better yields were obtained using 2% Pd(OAc)2/4% SPhos; see ref (14).
  14. a Bruno N. C.; Tudge M. T.; Buchwald S. L. Chem. Sci. 2013, 4, 916. 10.1039/C2SC20903A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Yang Y.; Oldenhius N. J.; Buchwald S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 615. 10.1002/anie.201207750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ragnarsson U.; Grehn L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 285. 10.1021/ar00010a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. a Jeromin G. E.; Orth W.; Rapp B.; Weiß W. Chem. Ber. 1987, 120, 649. 10.1002/cber.19871200431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Tilstam U.; Weinmann H. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2002, 6, 384. 10.1021/op010103h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. a Fraser C. L.; Anastasi N. R.; Lamba J. J. S. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 9314. 10.1021/jo971685x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Savage S. A.; Smith A. P.; Fraser C. L. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 10048. 10.1021/jo981505z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. a Mongin F.; Quéguiner G. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 4059. 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00100-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Dagousset G.; Francois C.; Leon T.; Blanc R.; Sansiaume-Dagousset E.; Knochel P. Synthesis 2014, 46 (23), 3133. 10.1055/s-0034-1378672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. a Snieckus V. Chem. Rev. 1990, 90 (6), 879. 10.1021/cr00104a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Haag B.; Mosrin M.; Ila H.; Malakhov V.; Knochel P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9794. 10.1002/anie.201101960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Barl N. M.; Werner V.; Saemann C.; Knochel P. Heterocycles 2014, 88, 827. 10.3987/REV-13-SR(S)4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; d Klatt T.; Markiewicz J. T.; Sämann C.; Knochel P. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 4253. 10.1021/jo500297r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Baldwin J. E.; Hoefle G. A.; Lever O. W. Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 7125. 10.1021/ja00829a064. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nafe J.; Herbert S.; Auras F.; Karaghiosoff K.; Bein T.; Knochel P. Chem. - Eur. J. 2015, 21, 1102. 10.1002/chem.201405240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol6b01373_si_001.pdf (2.7MB, pdf)

Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES