Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2017 Feb 6;11:48. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00048

Effects of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors on Interregional Relation of Serotonin Transporter Availability in Major Depression

Gregory M James 1, Pia Baldinger-Melich 1, Cecile Philippe 2, Georg S Kranz 1, Thomas Vanicek 1, Andreas Hahn 1, Gregor Gryglewski 1, Marius Hienert 1, Marie Spies 1, Tatjana Traub-Weidinger 2, Markus Mitterhauser 2, Wolfgang Wadsak 2, Marcus Hacker 2, Siegfried Kasper 1, Rupert Lanzenberger 1,*
PMCID: PMC5292566  PMID: 28220069

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) modulate serotonergic neurotransmission by blocking reuptake of serotonin from the extracellular space. Up to now, it remains unclear how SSRIs achieve their antidepressant effect. However, task-based and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging studies, have demonstrated connectivity changes between brain regions. Here, we use positron emission tomography (PET) to quantify SSRI’s main target, the serotonin transporter (SERT), and assess treatment-induced molecular changes in the interregional relation of SERT binding potential (BPND). Nineteen out-patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 19 healthy controls (HC) were included in this study. Patients underwent three PET measurements with the radioligand [11C]DASB: (1) at baseline, (2) after a first SSRI dose; and (3) following at least 3 weeks of daily intake. Controls were measured once with PET. Correlation analyses were restricted to brain regions repeatedly implicated in MDD pathophysiology. After 3 weeks of daily SSRI administration a significant increase in SERT BPND correlations of anterior cingulate cortex and insula with the amygdala, midbrain, hippocampus, pallidum and putamen (p < 0.05; false discovery rate, FDR corrected) was revealed. No significant differences were found when comparing MDD patients and HC at baseline. These findings are in line with the clinical observation that treatment response to SSRIs is often achieved only after a latency of several weeks. The elevated associations in interregional SERT associations may be more closely connected to clinical outcomes than regional SERT occupancy measures and could reflect a change in the regional interaction of serotonergic neurotransmission during antidepressant treatment.

Keywords: positron emission tomography, serotonin transporter, depression, SSRI, antidepressants, connectivity, network analysis

Introduction

The world health organization has estimated some 350 million people of all ages to suffer from major depressive disorder (MDD), which is associated with general disability and increased mortality (World Health Organization, 2015). For the treatment of MDD, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have become the most commonly prescribed substance class (Kraft et al., 2007; Farnia et al., 2015). Their mechanism of action is based on their ability to bind the serotonin transporter (SERT), hereby inhibiting serotonin (5-HT) reuptake, thus causing an elevation in 5-HT levels in the extracellular space. However, beyond this neurochemical effect, it remains unclear how SSRIs lead to an improvement of depressive symptoms, in particular as symptom improvement occurs after a latency period of several weeks and because not all patients respond to initial treatment (Esposito and Goodnick, 2003; Kraft et al., 2007; Holsboer, 2008; Lynch et al., 2011). In addition, the SERT is involved in the pathophysiology of depression, as demonstrated by molecular imaging studies showing reduced brain SERT binding in MDD (Gryglewski et al., 2014).

In recent years, brain network analyses using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have evolved as an innovative approach for the characterization of complex structural and functional connections between brain areas (Bassett et al., 2008; Bullmore and Sporns, 2009; Murphy et al., 2009; Weissenbacher et al., 2009; Rubinov and Sporns, 2010). Noteworthy is also the impressive increase of resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) studies in the last decade, i.e., the evaluation of spontaneous low-frequency brain activations in absence of a specific task (Biswal et al., 1995, 2010). These approaches have already proven to be valuable contributions in the investigation of psychiatric disorders, as previous studies investigating MDD and SSRI treatment were able to show alterations in structural and functional brain networks between the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and the amygdala, thalamus and striatum (Greicius et al., 2007; Anand et al., 2009; Lui et al., 2011; Zhu et al., 2012; Connolly et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014, 2015).

Positron emission tomography (PET) studies commonly directly quantify differences in binding of molecular targets in certain brain regions, e.g., by comparing patients and healthy control subjects. Hence, the in vivo quantification of selected proteins may enable the identification of biological correlates underlying psychiatric disorders.

However, even if conditions or groups of subjects may differ in certain characteristics, conducting comparisons of a molecular target solely on a regional level may in some cases not be the appropriate method to capture significant differences (Vanicek et al., 2014) as it does not detect systemic or interregional changes to neurotransmitter networks. The assessment of variations within one neurotransmitter system, reflected for example by interregional changes in protein concentration, seems a promising approach. With this in mind, the acquisition of interregional associations has recently been extended to the field of molecular imaging with PET. For instance, studies of the serotonin-1A (5-HT1A) receptor and SERT evaluated relationships between brain regions (Hahn et al., 2010; Bose et al., 2011; Hahn et al., 2014). Moreover, these associations of 5-HT1A and SERT were markedly different in patients (Hahn et al., 2014), changed after SSRI treatment (Hahn et al., 2010) and predicted SSRI treatment response (Lanzenberger et al., 2012).

The mentioned studies focused on specific interactions of the raphe nuclei in the midbrain with serotonergic projection areas. Therefore, we aimed to establish a method for the detection of molecular interregional relationships. These relationships may underline the aforementioned dysregulations proposed in connectivity, reflected by an altered SERT distribution across brain regions in MDD. Thus, unlike the comparison of protein densities in regions of interest (ROIs) and between different conditions or subject groups, we expect general interregional changes that may be associated with the reported alterations in neural circuits in psychiatric disorders, as well as the impact of treatment procedures. Similar approaches analyzing interregional metabolic relations already have been realized previously using PET and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F] FDG; Horwitz et al., 1984; Metter et al., 1984; McIntosh and Gonzalez-Lima, 1993; Schreckenberger et al., 1998). It could be shown that correlations of glucose metabolism between anatomically delineated areas may reflect brain functions associated with a variety of cognitive processes. Here we aim to adapt this analysis to investigate associations between regions relating to neurotransmitter properties.

Previous studies have already reported the considerable reduction of SERT availability during SSRI treatment, expectedly caused by the antidepressant’s occupation of the SERT (Lanzenberger et al., 2012; Baldinger et al., 2014). In the present study we have investigated the serotonergic circuits of patients suffering from MDD at baseline and during treatment with SSRIs. We compared correlations in SERT availability between brain regions relevant in depression. That is, despite the absolute decrease of SERT availability during SSRI treatment, we are merely interested in the relative changes between brain regions. We hypothesized that healthy subjects and patients suffering from MDD differ in the interregional relation of SERT availability between regions relevant to MDD pathophysiology. Secondly, we expected a significant change in the interregional relation of SERT availability after SSRI treatment in the MDD group.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

Data from 19 subjects (13 female, age range 27–54 years of age, 42.26 ± 7.84) suffering from MDD which has been included in previous publications was analyzed (Lanzenberger et al., 2012; Baldinger et al., 2014; Hahn et al., 2014). In addition, data of 19 healthy controls (HC; 6 female, age range 27–54, 37.58 ± 8.28, mean ± SD) were analyzed for comparison. The groups differ in gender distribution (p = 0.023), but not in age (p = 0.082). However, since the latter result is marginal significant, we controlled for both, age and gender in the analyses to exclude any possible influence of these variables on the overall outcome. Psychiatric disorders were assessed using a Structured Clinical Interview (SCID) for DSM-IV diagnose and a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Prior to PET measurements the patients underwent neurological and physical examinations, consisting of an electrocardiogram, a routine blood examination, a urine drug test and, in women, a urine pregnancy test. Exclusion criteria were drug abuse, medication intake preceding the PET measurements within a period of 3 months (4 months for fluoxetine) and a HAM-D score of <16 in MDD patients. All subjects provided written informed consent after briefing and complete description of the study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Vienna and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Design and Treatment

In this longitudinal study design, patients underwent three PET measurements: first at baseline, second within 6 h after the administration of an oral SSRI dose, and the third measurement after a minimum of 3 weeks (mean time ± SD, 24.73 ± 3.3 days) of daily oral SSRI treatment. The study medication was citalopram (R, S-citalopram, 20 mg/day, nine subjects; Lundbeck A/S, Denmark) or escitalopram (S-citalopram, 10 mg/day, 10 subjects), which constitute frequently prescribed SSRIs that are administered to millions of patients. SERT binding potential (BPND) at baseline, after first and after at least 3 weeks of daily SSRI intake in patients is shown in Figure 1. HC were measured once at baseline (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Serotonin transporter (SERT) availability in healthy controls (HC; N = 19) and in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD; N = 19) during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI). Positron emission tomography (PET) 1 shows the condition at baseline, PET 2 6 h after a single oral intake of SSRI and PET 3 after at least 3 weeks of daily SSRI treatment. The decrease in SERT availability indicates SERT occupancy by SSRIs during therapy, which is especially visible in brain stem, subcortical regions and the cingulate cortex. The color table indicates SERT availability from low (blue) to high (red) measured in binding potential (BPND). Crosshair marks the corresponding location in sagittal, coronal and axial view (from left to right).

Positron Emission Tomography

PET measurements were performed using a GE Advance full-ring scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA) in 3D mode at the Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Nuclear Medicine of the Medical University of Vienna. For tissue attenuation correction a transmission scan of 5 min was carried out with 68GE rod sources. PET scans started as [11C]DASB was administered as a bolus injection and total acquisition time was 90 min, split into 15 × 1 min and 15 × 5 min time frames (30 time frames in total). Images were measured in kBq/ccm. Reconstruction occurred in 35 transaxial section volumes (128 × 128) with an iterative filtered backprojection algorithm (FORE-ITER) with a spatial resolution of 4.36 mm full-width at half maximum (FWHM) next to the center of the field of view (Lanzenberger et al., 2012).

Serotonin Transporter Quantification

PET images were between-frame motion-corrected and summed images were spatially normalized to a [11C]DASB specific template in stereotactic Montreal Institute (MNI) space using SPM8 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK1). The multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM2; Ichise et al., 2003) implemented in PMOD image analysis software, version 3.509 (PMOD Technologies Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland2) was used for the SERT BPND quantification, with cerebellar gray matter as the reference region and thalamus as the receptor-rich region. SERT availability is quantified by the BPND. This binding potential compared to the nondisplaceable uptake, is defined as (VT−VND)/VND (unitless). VT and VND denote the volume of distribution in the tissue and in the nondisplaceable compartment, respectively (Innis et al., 2007).

Regions of Interest

ROIs highly relevant in depression and SSRI treatment were selected based on both, published literature and acceptable signal to noise ratio (SNR) for SERT quantification. These ROIs mainly comprised subcortical regions, i.e., thalamus (Anand et al., 2005; Lui et al., 2011), putamen (Tao et al., 2013; Meng et al., 2014), caudate nucleus (Kim et al., 2008; Pizzagalli et al., 2009), globus pallidum (Anand et al., 2005), midbrain including dorsal and median raphe nuclei (Lanzenberger et al., 2012; Pandya et al., 2012), hippocampus (Lui et al., 2011; Sheline, 2011), and amygdala (Drevets et al., 2002; Veer et al., 2010; Lui et al., 2011; Gong and He, 2015), as well as cortical regions, i.e., the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; Anand et al., 2005; Sheline et al., 2010; Lui et al., 2011; Pizzagalli, 2011; Gong and He, 2015) and the insula (Veer et al., 2010; Jin et al., 2011; Lui et al., 2011; Connolly et al., 2013; Tao et al., 2013). Except the midbrain, all regions were delineated using the Harvard-Oxford probabilistic atlas and averaged for both hemispheres.

Statistical Analysis

To test for normality of the BPND values, a Shapiro-Wilk-Test was conducted, which was significant for two variables (data not shown) and due to a sample size of <20, all correlations were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation.

Molecular relation is here defined as correlation of the SERT density between brain regions, similar to “functional connectivity” in fMRI. However, functional connectivity refers to the temporal coupling of brain regions, whereas for neurotransmitter PET no time sequences are correlated, but molecular density quantities per region pair over the entire group/condition. Correlation matrices were created by calculating Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (rho; ρ) for each ROI pair over all subjects. To exclude the influence of potentially confounders, the variables age and gender were included as covariables into the partial correlation. This was done separately for each group and time point, i.e., PET 1 (at baseline), PET 2 (6 h after first treatment) and PET 3 (after at least 3 weeks of treatment), respectively. 3D volume images were generated using the Brain Net Viewer3 (Xia et al., 2013).

For the assessment of statistically significant differences in correlations, a 10,000-fold permutation test was performed. For the longitudinal analysis we assured that the measurements from every subject were separated into different conditions (i.e., time points) for each permutation, hence each subject was only assigned once to each condition. For overall comparison the resulting correlation matrices were transformed with Fisher’s r-to-z-transformation. A false discovery rate (FDR) correction with p < 0.05 was conducted, based on the number of correlations, using the Benjamini-Hochberg method for multiple comparison.

Results

Changes in Interregional Molecular Relation with Treatment in MDD Patients

Interregional SERT correlation matrices for each group and time point can be seen in Figure 2. Derived from the permutation tests, differences in interregional correlations of SERT BPND were observed in several region pairs between PET 1 and PET 2 only at p < 0.05 uncorrected. Here, an increase was present in the molecular association of the pallidum, putamen, insula, ACC, midbrain, hippocampus and amygdala (see Table 1, Figure 3), however, without reaching significance after correcting for multiple comparison. For all of the ROI pairs associated with the ACC and insula at PET 1 vs. PET 2, except for amygdala-pallidum, the strength of correlations further increased at PET 1 vs. PET 3, such that changes seen in this comparison were significant after correction for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05; FDR corrected). Furthermore, additional significant and corrected correlations emerged. A significant increase in molecular relation was predominantly observed for correlations involving the ACC and insula in conjunction with the amygdala, midbrain, hippocampus, pallidum and putamen (see Table 2, Figures 3, 4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Interregional SERT correlation matrices between nine regions of interest (ROIs). The upper left map shows the correlation (Spearman’s ρ) of SERT binding in HC. The upper right map displays the condition of depressive patients at baseline (PET 1; unmedicated), the lower left and lower right maps show the SERT availability after 6 h (PET 2) and after 3 weeks of oral SSRI treatment (PET 3), respectively. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; the color table indicates the molecular interregional relation between regions, given in Spearman’s rho (ρ).

Table 1.

Treatment-induced changes in the interregional molecular relation of serotonin transporter (SERT) availability in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Before treatment compared to first treatment (PET 1–PET 2)
ACC Midbrain (+0.45), pallidum (+0.61), putamen (+0.34)
Hippocampus Amygdala (+0.20), insula (+0.37), pallidum (+0.47)
Insula Pallidum (+0.56)
Open in a new tab

Changes are based on baseline Positron emission tomography (PET 1) compared to SERT availability after a single oral dose of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI; PET 2) (values in parenthesis are differences in Spearman’s ρ; p < 0.05, uncorrected).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Treatment-induced changes in the relation of SERT availability in depressive patients after administration of SSRI in two different treatment conditions (PET 2, PET 3) compared to baseline (PET 1). The lower triangle denotes significant increases in relations after a single oral SSRI dose in depressive patients (p < 0.05; uncorrected). The upper triangle shows significant increases after 3 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05; uncorrected). Framed squares indicate changes which remain significant after FDR correction for multiple comparison at p < 0.05. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; the color table indicates changes in correlation coefficients (Δρ).

Table 2.

Treatment-induced changes in the interregional molecular relation of SERT in patients with MDD, based on the comparison of baseline (PET 1) to the SERT availability after 3 weeks of daily administered selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment (PET 3).

Before treatment compared to ongoing treatment (PET 1–PET 3)
ACC Amygdala (+0.49)*, hippocampus (+0.24)*, midbrain (+0.67)*, pallidum (+0.71)*, putamen (+0.49)*
Insula Amygdala (+0.47)*, hippocampus (+0.43)*, midbrain (+0.51)*, pallidum (+0.61)*, putamen (+0.36)*
Hippocampus Amygdala (+0.24), putamen (+0.23)
Putamen Amygdala (+0.36)
Open in a new tab

Differences marked with an asterisk are significant after FDR correction (values in parenthesis are differences in Spearman’s rho; p < 0.05, uncorrected).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Brain network indicating an increase in SERT relations of depressive patients after 3 weeks of SSRI treatment compared to baseline (FDR corrected). The brain image was created with the BrainNet Viewer (http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv).

Differences in Interregional Molecular Relations between Healthy Controls and Patients at Baseline

The comparison of MDD at baseline and HC revealed differences in relations only at p < 0.05 uncorrected. Involved regions are the hippocampus, insula, thalamus, midbrain and pallidum (see Table 3). After correction for multiple comparison, there was no significant interregional correlation left.

Table 3.

Differences in interregional molecular relation of SERT availability between healthy subjects and patient suffering from MDD (values in parenthesis are differences in Spearman’s rho; p < 0.05, uncorrected).

Healthy subjects compared to patients with major depressive disorder at baseline (PET 1)
Hippocampus Thalamus (−0.23)
Pallidum Insula (−0.59), midbrain (0.34)
Open in a new tab

Discussion

Patients with Major Depressive Disorder during Treatment

In the current study we compared correlations in SERT availability between brain regions relevant in depression. Correlations of the ACC and insula with amygdala, midbrain, hippocampus, pallidum and putamen increased significantly after 3 weeks of SSRI treatment. These results suggest that an interregional rearrangement of SERT availability may contribute to SSRI treatment effects in MDD patients. The fact that a portion of these elevations tend to be present already after 6 h of treatment, may reflect a stabilization of these relations after continuation of SSRI treatment. These results parallel the chronological pattern seen in clinical improvement of MDD symptoms, which often requires several weeks of treatment, whereas only subtle changes can be detected in the initial phase (Taylor et al., 2006).

A number of fMRI studies investigated the influence of SSRIs on activity and functional connectivity. Reduced neural activation in the amygdala was found with fMRI when MDD patients were exposed to emotional, i.e., fearful and sad faces, following 8 weeks of antidepressant treatment (Sheline et al., 2001; Fu et al., 2004; Harmer and Cowen, 2013). Further effect of SSRI treatment could also be seen in the striatum and cortical regions, such as the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex (Fu et al., 2004). Furthermore, when investigating the functional connectivity in response to affective facial expressions, Chen et al. (2008) found a significantly increased coupling between the amygdala and the cingulate cortex, thalamus and striatum, in association with SSRI treatment. Using a similar paradigm with affective stimuli, treatment with venlafaxine (5-HT–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) affected the activation of the left insula already after 2 weeks of treatment (Davidson et al., 2003). To explore the presence of biomarkers to predict treatment outcomes with SSRIs, Miller et al. (2013) exposed unmedicated MDD patients to an emotional word processing fMRI task, following an 8 weeks treatment with escitalopram. They reported an association between lower activation prior to treatment in response to negative words in midbrain, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), insula, middle frontal cortex, premotor cortex, ACC, thalamus as well as caudate, and preferable treatment outcomes.

Although the present study could not reveal significant correlations in all of the aforementioned regions, at least a tendency for the most of these was also found in SERT associations. Of those, the ACC and insula were involved in all of the significant correlations. Interestingly, a number of these correlations appear already after 6 h, although not significant at this point. Using rs-fMRI and seed based connectivity analysis, McCabe and Mishor (2011) investigated the effect of citalopram on human brain circuits and selected several seed regions, including the right amygdala and the subgenual cingulate cortex. Although they were not able to show any differences in mood compared to a placebo group, they revealed a reduced functional connectivity between the amygdala and the ventral medial PFC, when using the amygdala as seed region (McCabe and Mishor, 2011). Due to the low SNR in the cortical areas in our study using this PET radioligand, the PFC had to be excluded from the analysis. Further, it was also demonstrated that the resting state functional connectivity between the left dorsal nexus (dorsal medial PFC) and the left hippocampus was reduced after SSRI treatment (McCabe et al., 2011).

Moreover, not only the functional connectivity, but also changes in the regional glucose consumption are of interest. In a PET study assessing the total glucose metabolism with [18F] FDG, a general shift in glucose metabolism was observed with SSRI treatment, namely, an increased glucose metabolism in cortical areas, such as the dorsolateral, ventrolateral, medial prefrontal and parietal cortex, as well as in the dorsal ACC. On the other hand, the left insular cortex, hippocampus and parahippocampal regions showed a decreased consumption after an SSRI treatment period of 6 weeks (Kennedy et al., 2001). These shifts underline the possibility of a “normalization” effect in brain regions due to SSRI treatment that may also be driven by the alterations in SERT densities across regions.

Our current findings suggest that the therapeutic effect of SSRI treatment is mediated by rebalancing SERT in cortical and subcortical areas. In this study interregional changes occurred among the insula and ACC, in association with the midbrain, amygdala, hippocampus, pallidum and putamen. In the light of the present results, we propose that the changes in SERT relations may contribute to a better understanding of the delayed antidepressant effects during SSRI treatment, which may be reflected and influenced by a delayed adjustment of the relationship between interregional SERT densities.

Patients with Depression vs. Healthy Control

We compared the SERT interregional relations in depressed patients at baseline with those of HC. A recent meta-analysis revealed reduced SERT availability in MDD and highlighted the impact of symptom heterogeneity, which might provide an explanation for contradictory results, when investigating the SERT in MDD patients (Gryglewski et al., 2014; Spies et al., 2015). In our comparison a tendency towards decreased SERT correlations in MDD was observed mainly for pallidum, insula and ACC. Although these are not significant after FDR correction, they contribute to our insight on differences in SERT binding in depression on a network level. Interestingly, the relations pallidum-insula and pallidum-ACC are among those elevations occurring after 3 weeks of SSRI treatment. Veer et al. (2010) reported a decreased functional connectivity of the amygdala and left insula with other regions in a whole brain network in depressed subjects. This finding may reflect the impaired ability of depressed patients to regulate negative emotions, a process in which the amygdala has shown substantial involvement (Johnstone et al., 2007; Veer et al., 2010). Further fMRI studies reported the involvement of the amygdala, pallidostriatum, medial thalamus and insula during the exposure of negative vs. neutral stimuli in patients with depressed subjects compared to HC (Anand et al., 2005), as well as frontal gyri, ACC and thalamus (Teasdale et al., 1999). It is known that the insula, ACC, temporal pole and amygdala comprise regions which are involved in emotional perception and regulation (Pessoa, 2008), as well as the medial thalamus and hypothalamus (Alexander et al., 1990; Phillips et al., 2003).

Limitations

One limitation of this study is that we did not differentiate between first and recurrent depressive episodes in the MDD patient group. It has been previously proposed that repeated occurrences of episodes may impact on functional connectivity patterns (Veer et al., 2010) and thus deteriorate the clinical picture. However, a recent study investigating the antidepressant efficacy of pre-adult onset compared to adult-onset MDD also did not find differences regarding response, remission or tolerability of antidepressant drugs (Sung et al., 2013). The consideration of the overall treatment response or differentiation of SSRI medication type (R,S-citalopram vs. S-citalopram) might also affect the present findings. Another concern worthy to be mentioned is the relatively low number of subjects. As a consequence, the limited sample size may cause increases in false negative results, which should be improved in future studies. Nevertheless, the reported results withstood correction for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg method, which adequately controls for false positive findings.

Therefore, a sample size with a minimum of subjects per group is required to maintain statistical power in the application of the permutation test procedure. Thus, the results presented here were not further differentiated by treatment response outcomes, leading to even smaller group sizes. However, a less heterogenic but more extensive patient group could contribute to highlight these differences even more clearly. Further, the consideration of all brain regions, including cortical regions, in this analysis would have allowed to form more global statement in terms of interregional effects on SERT binding. The low SNR due to the sparse SERT density in the most cortical regions although, urge to focus on those regions that show a high binding. However, according to the design of the present study, no evidence can be provided if the elevated correlation of BPND between regions results from an overall decrease of interregional differences due to SERT occupancy. The observation of elevated correlations of BPND between regions may be attributed to this effect, given preserved inter-individual differences in BPND. Finally, the outcomes on interregional relations presented here were determined on group level. Future studies investigating changes in interregional relations based on dynamic PET will enlighten if changes occur also in single subjects.

Conclusion

In the present study we were able to detect changes in interregional correlations of SERT BPND with SSRI treatment in MDD patients, towards a significant increased rearrangement of SERT availability. This finding underlines the concept of interregional changes, rather than mere focal modifications, induced by SSRIs. Our results hereby contribute to a better understanding of SSRI treatment effects.

Author Contributions

GMJ designed the methods, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote main parts of the article. PB-M assisted the measurements and contributed to the study design. CP synthetized the radioligand and edited the manuscript. Support for the statistical implementation was given by GSK. TV assisted the measurements and contributed to the methods of the manuscript. AH gave major technical support, conceptual advice for the methodology and edited the manuscript. GG helped to develop the methodology and edited the manuscript. Advice in all medical concerns and contribution to the discussion and limitations was given by MHi. MS performed the literature search and wrote parts of the discussion. TT-W administered the radioligand and designed the measurements. MM gave technical support and developed the radioligand together with WW, which also planned the production. MHa provided the facilities for the radioligand synthesis and gave conceptual advice. SK supervised the entire experiment and patient care. RL developed the concept of the research question, provided funding and revised the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and implications and commented on the manuscript at all stages.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This scientific project and reevaluation of data were performed with the support of the Medical Imaging Cluster of the Medical University of Vienna. Personal costs were partly funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Grant 27141, the Austrian National Bank (OeNB Anniversary Fund No. 11468) to RL, PET measurements and treatment were supported by an investigator-initiated and unrestricted research grant (11821) from H. Lundbeck A/S, Denmark to SK. H. Lundbeck A/S, FWF and OeNB had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report and in the decision to submit the article for publication. GG is recipient of a DOC Fellowship of the Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Institute of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna. The authors thank the medical and technical teams of the PET Center at the Medical University of the Vienna (D. Haeusler, G. Karanikas, K. Kletter, G. Wagner, B. Reiterits, I. Leitinger, R. Bartosch), the psychiatrists of the Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy of the Medical University of Vienna (A.S. Höflich, C. Kraus, D. Winkler, E. Akimova, C. Spindelegger, M. Fink, U. Moser, M. Willert) and H. Sitte from the center for physiology and pharmacology of the Medical University of Vienna. Parts of this study have been presented by G.M. James at the 28th European College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ECNP), August 29–September 1, 2015, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Footnotes

References

  1. Alexander G. E., Crutcher M. D., Delong M. R. (1990). Basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, “prefrontal” and “limbic” functions. Prog. Brain Res. 85, 119–146. 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)62678-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anand A., Li Y., Wang Y., Lowe M. J., Dzemidzic M. (2009). Resting state corticolimbic connectivity abnormalities in unmedicated bipolar disorder and unipolar depression. Psychiatry Res. 171, 189–198. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.03.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand A., Li Y., Wang Y., Wu J., Gao S., Bukhari L., et al. (2005). Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 1079–1088. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baldinger P., Kranz G. S., Haeusler D., Savli M., Spies M., Philippe C., et al. (2014). Regional differences in SERT occupancy after acute and prolonged SSRI intake investigated by brain PET. Neuroimage 88, 252–262. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bassett D. S., Bullmore E., Verchinski B. A., Mattay V. S., Weinberger D. R., Meyer-Lindenberg A. (2008). Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J. Neurosci. 28, 9239–9248. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1929-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Biswal B., Yetkin F. Z., Haughton V. M., Hyde J. S. (1995). Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541. 10.1002/mrm.1910340409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Biswal B. B., Mennes M., Zuo X. N., Gohel S., Kelly C., Smith S. M., et al. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 4734–4739. 10.1073/pnas.0911855107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bose S. K., Mehta M. A., Selvaraj S., Howes O. D., Hinz R., Rabiner E. A., et al. (2011). Presynaptic 5-HT1A is related to 5-HTT receptor density in the human brain. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 2258–2265. 10.1038/npp.2011.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bullmore E., Sporns O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198. 10.1038/nrn2575 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen C. H., Suckling J., Ooi C., Fu C. H., Williams S. C., Walsh N. D., et al. (2008). Functional coupling of the amygdala in depressed patients treated with antidepressant medication. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 1909–1918. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Connolly C. G., Wu J., Ho T. C., Hoeft F., Wolkowitz O., Eisendrath S., et al. (2013). Resting-state functional connectivity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in depressed adolescents. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 898–907. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Davidson R. J., Irwin W., Anderle M. J., Kalin N. H. (2003). The neural substrates of affective processing in depressed patients treated with venlafaxine. Am. J. Psychiatry 160, 64–75. 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.1.64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drevets W. C., Bogers W., Raichle M. E. (2002). Functional anatomical correlates of antidepressant drug treatment assessed using PET measures of regional glucose metabolism. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 12, 527–544. 10.1016/s0924-977x(02)00102-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Esposito K., Goodnick P. (2003). Predictors of response in depression. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 26, 353–365. 10.1016/s0193-953x(02)00104-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Farnia V., Hojatitabar S., Shakeri J., Rezaei M., Yazdchi K., Bajoghli H., et al. (2015). Adjuvant rosa damascena has a small effect on SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction in female patients suffering from MDD. Pharmacopsychiatry 48, 156–163. 10.1055/s-0035-1554712 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fu C. H., Williams S. C., Cleare A. J., Brammer M. J., Walsh N. D., Kim J., et al. (2004). Attenuation of the neural response to sad faces in major depression by antidepressant treatment: a prospective, event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 61, 877–889. 10.1001/archpsyc.61.9.877 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gong Q., He Y. (2015). Depression, neuroimaging and connectomics: a selective overview. Biol. Psychiatry 77, 223–235. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Greicius M. D., Flores B. H., Menon V., Glover G. H., Solvason H. B., Kenna H., et al. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 429–437. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gryglewski G., Lanzenberger R., Kranz G. S., Cumming P. (2014). Meta-analysis of molecular imaging of serotonin transporters in major depression. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 34, 1096–1103. 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hahn A., Haeusler D., Kraus C., Höflich A. S., Kranz G. S., Baldinger P., et al. (2014). Attenuated serotonin transporter association between dorsal raphe and ventral striatum in major depression. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 3857–3866. 10.1002/hbm.22442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Hahn A., Lanzenberger R., Wadsak W., Spindelegger C., Moser U., Mien L. K., et al. (2010). Escitalopram enhances the association of serotonin-1A autoreceptors to heteroreceptors in anxiety disorders. J. Neurosci. 30, 14482–14489. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2409-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Harmer C. J., Cowen P. J. (2013). ‘It’s the way that you look at it’—a cognitive neuropsychological account of SSRI action in depression. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 368:20120407. 10.1098/rstb.2012.0407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Holsboer F. (2008). How can we realize the promise of personalized antidepressant. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 638–646. 10.1038/nrn2453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Horwitz B., Duara R., Rapoport S. I. (1984). Intercorrelations of glucose metabolic rates between brain regions: application to healthy males in a state of reduced sensory input. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 4, 484–499. 10.1038/jcbfm.1984.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ichise M., Liow J. S., Lu J. Q., Takano A., Model K., Toyama H., et al. (2003). Linearized reference tissue parametric imaging methods: application to [11C]DASB positron emission tomography studies of the serotonin transporter in human brain. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 23, 1096–1112. 10.1097/01.WCB.0000085441.37552.CA [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Innis R. B., Cunningham V. J., Delforge J., Fujita M., Gjedde A., Gunn R. N., et al. (2007). Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 27, 1533–1539. 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jin C., Gao C., Chen C., Ma S., Netra R., Wang Y., et al. (2011). A preliminary study of the dysregulation of the resting networks in first-episode medication-naive adolescent depression. Neurosci. Lett. 503, 105–109. 10.1016/j.neulet.2011.08.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnstone T., van Reekum C. M., Urry H. L., Kalin N. H., Davidson R. J. (2007). Failure to regulate: counterproductive recruitment of top-down prefrontal-subcortical circuitry in major depression. J. Neurosci. 27, 8877–8884. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2063-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kennedy S. H., Evans K. R., Krüger S., Mayberg H. S., Meyer J. H., Mccann S., et al. (2001). Changes in regional brain glucose metabolism measured with positron emission tomography after paroxetine treatment of major depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 158, 899–905. 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.987.899 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim M. J., Hamilton J. P., Gotlib I. H. (2008). Reduced caudate gray matter volume in women with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res. 164, 114–122. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.12.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kraft J. B., Peters E. J., Slager S. L., Jenkins G. D., Reinalda M. S., Mcgrath P. J., et al. (2007). Analysis of association between the serotonin transporter and antidepressant response in a large clinical sample. Biol. Psychiatry 61, 734–742. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lanzenberger R., Kranz G. S., Haeusler D., Akimova E., Savli M., Hahn A., et al. (2012). Prediction of SSRI treatment response in major depression based on serotonin transporter interplay between median raphe nucleus and projection areas. Neuroimage 63, 874–881. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lui S., Wu Q., Qiu L., Yang X., Kuang W., Chan R. C., et al. (2011). Resting-state functional connectivity in treatment-resistant depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 642–648. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.10101419 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lynch F. L., Dickerson J. F., Clarke G., Vitiello B., Porta G., Wagner K. D., et al. (2011). Incremental cost-effectiveness of combined therapy vs medication only for youth with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression: treatment of SSRI-resistant depression in adolescents trial findings. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 68, 253–262. 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. McCabe C., Mishor Z. (2011). Antidepressant medications reduce subcortical-cortical resting-state functional connectivity in healthy volunteers. Neuroimage 57, 1317–1323. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. McCabe C., Mishor Z., Filippini N., Cowen P. J., Taylor M. J., Harmer C. J. (2011). SSRI administration reduces resting state functional connectivity in dorso-medial prefrontal cortex. Mol. Psychiatry 16, 592–594. 10.1038/mp.2010.138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McIntosh A. R., Gonzalez-Lima F. (1993). Network analysis of functional auditory pathways mapped with fluorodeoxyglucose: associative effects of a tone conditioned as a Pavlovian excitor or inhibitor. Brain Res. 627, 129–140. 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90756-d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meng C., Brandl F., Tahmasian M., Shao J., Manoliu A., Scherr M., et al. (2014). Aberrant topology of striatum’s connectivity is associated with the number of episodes in depression. Brain 137, 598–609. 10.1093/brain/awt290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Metter E. J., Riege W. H., Kuhl D. E., Phelps M. E. (1984). Cerebral metabolic relationships for selected brain regions in healthy adults. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 4, 1–7. 10.1038/jcbfm.1984.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Miller J. M., Schneck N., Siegle G. J., Chen Y., Ogden R. T., Kikuchi T., et al. (2013). fMRI response to negative words and SSRI treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: a preliminary study. Psychiatry Res. 214, 296–305. 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2013.08.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Murphy K., Birn R. M., Handwerker D. A., Jones T. B., Bandettini P. A. (2009). The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced? Neuroimage 44, 893–905. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Pandya M., Altinay M., Malone D. A., Jr., Anand A. (2012). Where in the brain is depression? Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 14, 634–642. 10.1007/s11920-012-0322-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pessoa L. (2008). On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 148–158. 10.1038/nrn2317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Phillips M. L., Drevets W. C., Rauch S. L., Lane R. (2003). Neurobiology of emotion perception I: the neural basis of normal emotion perception. Biol. Psychiatry 54, 504–514. 10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00168-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Pizzagalli D. A. (2011). Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: toward biomarkers of treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 183–206. 10.1038/npp.2010.166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Pizzagalli D. A., Holmes A. J., Dillon D. G., Goetz E. L., Birk J. L., Bogdan R., et al. (2009). Reduced caudate and nucleus accumbens response to rewards in unmedicated individuals with major depressive disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 166, 702–710. 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08081201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Rubinov M., Sporns O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 1059–1069. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schreckenberger M., Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E., Sabri O., Arning C., Schulz G., Tuttass T., et al. (1998). Cerebral interregional correlations of associative language processing: a positron emission tomography activation study using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 25, 1511–1519. 10.1007/s002590050329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sheline Y. I. (2011). Depression and the hippocampus: cause or effect? Biol. Psychiatry 70, 308–309. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Sheline Y. I., Barch D. M., Donnelly J. M., Ollinger J. M., Snyder A. Z., Mintun M. A. (2001). Increased amygdala response to masked emotional faces in depressed subjects resolves with antidepressant treatment: an fMRI study. Biol. Psychiatry 50, 651–658. 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01263-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheline Y. I., Price J. L., Yan Z., Mintun M. A. (2010). Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 11020–11025. 10.1073/pnas.1000446107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Spies M., Knudsen G. M., Lanzenberger R., Kasper S. (2015). The serotonin transporter in psychiatric disorders: insights from PET imaging. Lancet Psychiatry 2, 743–755. 10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00232-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Sung S. C., Wisniewski S. R., Balasubramani G. K., Zisook S., Kurian B., Warden D., et al. (2013). Does early-onset chronic or recurrent major depression impact outcomes with antidepressant medications? A CO-MED trial report. Psychol. Med. 43, 945–960. 10.1017/s0033291712001742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tao H., Guo S., Ge T., Kendrick K. M., Xue Z., Liu Z., et al. (2013). Depression uncouples brain hate circuit. Mol. Psychiatry 18, 101–111. 10.1038/mp.2011.127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Taylor M. J., Freemantle N., Geddes J. R., Bhagwagar Z. (2006). Early onset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant action: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 63, 1217–1223. 10.1001/archpsyc.63.11.1217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Teasdale J. D., Howard R. J., Cox S. G., Ha Y., Brammer M. J., Williams S. C., et al. (1999). Functional MRI study of the cognitive generation of affect. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 209–215. 10.1176/ajp.156.2.209 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vanicek T., Spies M., Rami-Mark C., Savli M., Höflich A., Kranz G. S., et al. (2014). The norepinephrine transporter in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder investigated with positron emission tomography. JAMA Psychiatry 71, 1340–1349. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Veer I. M., Beckmann C. F., van Tol M. J., Ferrarini L., Milles J., Veltman D. J., et al. (2010). Whole brain resting-state analysis reveals decreased functional connectivity in major depression. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:41. 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang L., Li K., Zhang Q., Zeng Y., Dai W., Su Y., et al. (2014). Short-term effects of escitalopram on regional brain function in first-episode drug-naive patients with major depressive disorder assessed by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychol. Med. 44, 1417–1426. 10.1017/s0033291713002031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Wang L., Xia M., Li K., Zeng Y., Su Y., Dai W., et al. (2015). The effects of antidepressant treatment on resting-state functional brain networks in patients with major depressive disorder. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 768–778. 10.1002/hbm.22663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Weissenbacher A., Kasess C., Gerstl F., Lanzenberger R., Moser E., Windischberger C. (2009). Correlations and anticorrelations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI: a quantitative comparison of preprocessing strategies. Neuroimage 47, 1408–1416. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. World Health Organization (2015). “Depression”, in Fact Sheet. Available online at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/ [accessed November 27, 2015].
  63. Xia M., Wang J., He Y. (2013). BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One 8:e68910. 10.1371/journal.pone.0068910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhu X., Wang X., Xiao J., Liao J., Zhong M., Wang W., et al. (2012). Evidence of a dissociation pattern in resting-state default mode network connectivity in first-episode, treatment-naive major depression patients. Biol. Psychiatry 71, 611–617. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES