Skip to main content
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
. 2017 Feb 7;11:52. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00052

The Effects of Age, from Young to Middle Adulthood, and Gender on Resting State Functional Connectivity of the Dopaminergic Midbrain

Andrew C Peterson 1, Sheng Zhang 2, Sien Hu 2, Herta H Chao 3,4, Chiang-shan R Li 2,5,6,*
PMCID: PMC5293810  PMID: 28223929

Abstract

Dysfunction of the dopaminergic ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) is implicated in psychiatric disorders including attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), addiction, schizophrenia and movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD). Although the prevalence of these disorders varies by age and sex, the underlying neural mechanism is not well understood. The objective of this study was to delineate the distinct resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the VTA and SNc and examine the effects of age, from young to middle-adulthood, and sex on the rsFC of these two dopaminergic structures in a data set of 250 healthy adults (18–49 years of age, 104 men). Using blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signals, we correlated the time course of the VTA and SNc to the time courses of all other brain voxels. At a corrected threshold, paired t-test showed stronger VTA connectivity to bilateral angular gyrus and superior/middle and orbital frontal regions and stronger SNc connectivity to the insula, thalamus, parahippocampal gyrus (PHG) and amygdala. Compared to women, men showed a stronger VTA/SNc connectivity to the left posterior orbital gyrus. In linear regressions, men but not women showed age-related changes in VTA/SNc connectivity to a number of cortical and cerebellar regions. Supporting shared but also distinct cerebral rsFC of the VTA and SNc and gender differences in age-related changes from young and middle adulthood in VTA/SNc connectivity, these new findings help advance our understanding of the neural bases of many neuropsychiatric illnesses that implicate the dopaminergic systems.

Keywords: ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, functional connectivity, aging, sex difference

Introduction

VTA and SNc Function

As the main dopamine (DA) producing nuclei in the midbrain, the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) contribute to many cognitive processes, including reward/saliency processing, error prediction for cognitive control and the execution of movement (Haber and Fudge, 1997). Deficits in these dopaminergic functions are implicated in psychiatric disorders such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD; Volkow et al., 2007, 2009), addiction (Groman and Jentsch, 2012) and schizophrenia (Lau et al., 2013) as well as movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD; Braak et al., 2003; Christopher et al., 2015).

Efferent projections from the VTA and SNc are classically divided into mesocortical (VTA → prefrontal cortex [PFC]), mesolimbic (VTA → nucleus accumbens [NAc]) and nigrostriatal (SNc → striatum) systems (Haber and Fudge, 1997). Major inputs to the VTA/SNc are summarized well in a review by Haber and Knutson (2010). Primary inputs come from the ventromedial PFC (vmPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), hippocampus and amygdala (Haber and Knutson, 2010). Whereas these may form some of the major pathways to and from the VTA/SNc, the functional networks of the midbrain nuclei are significantly more complex (Düzel et al., 2009; Murty et al., 2014; Tomasi and Volkow, 2014), and important to understanding the etiology of DA-related diseases (Anand et al., 2005; Greicius et al., 2007; Uddin et al., 2008). This study characterizes and compares resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the two structures and explores how age and sex affects the connectivities.

The VTA attributes reward value or salience to environmental stimuli to guide behavior towards a desirable outcome (Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010). For example, in response to a reward the medial PFC (mPFC) boosts VTA DA transmission to facilitate attention toward the same rewarding stimulus (Laviolette et al., 2005; Lodge, 2011). Conversely, avoidance responses to a negative stimulus are associated with silencing of VTA DA neurons (Danjo et al., 2014). The VTA thus integrates information on reward/risk, maintains and updates working memory (Hazy et al., 2006), and controls goal-directed behavior (Bromberg-Martin et al., 2010; Redgrave et al., 2010) through reward-based learning (Berridge and Robinson, 1998; Schultz, 2002; Wise, 2004). Thus, we anticipate the VTA to be strongly connected to prefrontal cortical regions.

The SNc is instrumental for action selection and execution of movement (DeLong et al., 1983; Mink, 1996; Haber and Fudge, 1997; Friend and Kravitz, 2014). The SNc is reciprocally connected to the dorsal striatum (DS; Haber and Knutson, 2010). Signals from the DS are carried through the basal ganglia circuit to facilitate (direct pathway) or inhibit (indirect pathway) movement (DeLong et al., 1983; Mink, 1996; Friend and Kravitz, 2014). On the other hand, more recent studies suggested an expanded scope of SNc function. For instance, in monkeys the SNc responds to both rewarding and aversive stimuli, supporting a role for the SNc in mediating responses to saliency (Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2009). In humans, the dorsolateral midbrain, primarily the SNc, responds the strongest to motivationally salient signals (D’Ardenne et al., 2013) much like the VTA. Thus, the VTA and SNc may not be functionally as distinct as once thought. We expect our study to demonstrate strong SNc connectivity to regions within the basal ganglia, in support of motor function. Additionally, we hypothesize the SNc will demonstrate connectivity to regions within the salience network including the insula. Examining the rsFC may provide a useful venue to unraveling shared and distinct roles of both the VTA and SNc.

Age-Related Changes in the Dopamine Systems

The cognitive and motor functions that have been attributed to the DA systems are known to decline with age (Morgan et al., 1987; Watanabe, 1987; Kish et al., 1992; Rollo, 2009; Martorana and Koch, 2014; see also Bäckman et al., 2010 for a review). A number of studies demonstrated reduced DA release (Morgan et al., 1987; Kish et al., 1992), as well as reduced DA receptor (Morgan et al., 1987) and DA transporter (Shingai et al., 2014) expression in association with healthy aging (Rollo, 2009; Martorana and Koch, 2014). Age-related decline of DA starts in the third decade of life and continues at a 10% loss each decade after (Bannon and Whitty, 1997; Reeves et al., 2002). Age-related decrease in DA signaling is linked to lower metabolism in frontal and cingulate cortices (Volkow et al., 2000). It is likely that age-related changes in the DA systems will also manifest in functional connectivity. Furthermore, since DA appears to show an inverted U shape relationship with cognitive measures (Cools and D’Esposito, 2011), it is important to know how rsFC of the dopaminergic midbrain may change with age. Tomasi and Volkow (2014) documented distinct changes in VTA and SNc connectivity during child development and suggested that these changes may contribute to reductions in impulsivity during the transition from adolescence to young adulthood. In older adults, selective degeneration of the SNc is known to contribute to the progression of PD (Schulz-Schaeffer, 2015). Given the above-mentioned changes in VTA/SNc functional connectivity from adolescence to young adulthood and the functional implications of changes in the DA system we sought to investigate age-related changes from young to middle adulthood.

Sex Related Differences in Dopamine Systems

Many neuropsychiatric conditions show sex differences in pathogenesis and clinical manifestation (Byrnes et al., 1999; Croson and Gneezy, 2009; Eaton et al., 2012; Zhou et al., 2014; Beltz et al., 2015; Park and Park, 2016). While women are more likely than men to develop depression and anxiety, men are more likely than women to develop substance use disorders (SUDs; Eaton et al., 2012; Kuhn, 2015). Both mood disorders and SUDs involve DA dysfunction (Goto et al., 2016; Oliva and Wanat, 2016). There are numerous imaging studies characterizing sex differences in regional activations or functional connectivity to task challenges (Li et al., 2009; Gong et al., 2011), some specifically on DA-related functions (Hoeft et al., 2008). For example, computer games are known to increase the release of DA in the NAc (Koepp et al., 1998) and men showed stronger ventral striatal activation in comparison to women during gaming (Hoeft et al., 2008). Likewise, rsFC revealed sex differences in conditions that implicate DA function including ADHD, nicotine dependance, risk-taking behavior (Byrnes et al., 1999; Zhou et al., 2014; Beltz et al., 2015; Park and Park, 2016). Thus, it is important to understand sex differences in the rsFC of the VTA and SNc. If any sex related differences exist within the DA systems, we predict the VTA is more likely to be affected than the SNc since the prevalence of SUDs varies considerably between men and women and the link between the VTA and addiction has been well established.

Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in accordance with a protocol approved by the Yale Human Investigation Committee.

Data Set

Resting-state fMRI scans were pooled from three data sets (Leiden_2180/Leiden_2200, Newark, and Beijing_Zang, n = 144), downloadable from the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project (Biswal et al., 2010), and our own data (n = 106). In selecting the data, we tried to include as many subjects as possible but only datasets acquired under conditions identical to our own (e.g., similar TR, all under 3T, all eyes closed), as in our earlier work (Zhang et al., 2012; Zhang and Li, 2014). Individual subjects’ images were viewed one by one to ensure that the whole brain was covered. A total of 250 healthy subjects’ resting state data (18–49 years of age; 104 men; one scan per participant; duration: 4.5–10 with 8.4 ± 1.6 min) were analyzed. Table 1 summarizes these data sets.

Table 1.

Demographic information and imaging parameters of the resting-state functional MRI data obtained from the image repository for the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project and our laboratory.

Dataset Subjects Age (years) Time points TR (s) Slice acquisition order
Beijing_Zang 31 M/66 F 18–26 225 2 Interleaved ascending
Leiden_2180 10 M/0 F 20–27 215 2.18 Sequential descending
Leiden_2200 11 M/8 F 18–28 215 2.2 Sequential descending
Newark 9 M/9 F 21–39 135 2 Interleaved ascending
Our own 63 M/43 F 19–49 295 2 Interleaved ascending

Note: M, males; F, females; TR, repetition time.

Imaging Data Processing

Brain imaging data were preprocessed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8, Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK). Images from the first five TRs at the beginning of each trial were discarded to enable the signal to achieve steady-state equilibrium between RF pulsing and relaxation. Standard image preprocessing was performed. Images of each individual subject were first realigned (motion corrected) and corrected for slice timing. A mean functional image volume was constructed for each subject per run from the realigned image volumes. These mean images were co-registered with the high resolution structural image and then segmented for normalization with affine registration followed by nonlinear transformation (Friston et al., 1995; Ashburner and Friston, 1999). The normalization parameters determined for the structure volume were then applied to the corresponding functional image volumes for each subject. Finally, the images were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 4 mm at full width at half maximum (FWHM).

Additional preprocessing was applied to reduce spurious blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) variances that were unlikely to reflect neuronal activity (Rombouts et al., 2003; Fox et al., 2005; Fair et al., 2007; Fox and Raichle, 2007). The sources of spurious variance were removed through linear regression by including the signal from the ventricular system, white matter, and whole brain, in addition to the six parameters obtained by rigid body head motion correction. First-order derivatives of the whole brain, ventricular and white matter signals were also included in the regression.

Cordes et al. (2001) suggested that BOLD fluctuations below a frequency of 0.1 Hz contribute to regionally specific BOLD correlations. Thus, we applied a temporal band-pass filter (0.009 Hz < f < 0.08 Hz) to the time course in order to obtain low-frequency fluctuations, as in previous studies (Lowe et al., 1998; Fox et al., 2005; Fair et al., 2007; Fox and Raichle, 2007).

Head Motion

As extensively investigated in Van Dijk et al. (2012), micro head motion (>0.1 mm) is an important source of spurious correlations in rsFC analysis. Therefore, we applied a “scrubbing” method (Smyser et al., 2010; Power et al., 2012; Tomasi and Volkow, 2014) to remove time points affected by head motions. Briefly, for every time point t, we computed the framewise displacement given by FD(t) = |Δdx(t)| + |Δdy(t)| + |Δdz(t)| + r|α(t)| + r|β(t)| + r|γ(t)|, where (dx, dy, dz) and (α, β, γ) are the translational and rotational movements, respectively, and r (= 50 mm) is a constant that approximates the mean distance between center of MNI space and the cortex and transform rotations into displacements (Power et al., 2012). The second head movement metric was the root mean square variance (DVARS) of the differences in % BOLD intensity I(t) between consecutive time points across brain voxels, computed as follows: DVARS(t) = |I(t)I(t1)|2, where the brackets indicate the mean across brain voxels. Finally, to compute each subject’s correlation map, we removed every time point that exceeded the head motion limit FD (t) > 0.5 mm or DVARS(t) > 0.5% (Power et al., 2012; Tomasi and Volkow, 2014). On average, 1% of the time points were removed across subjects.

Seed Based Correlation and Group Analyses

The VTA and SNc masks were drawn from 7T MR images (Figure 1) using a region-growing segmentation algorithm (Eapen et al., 2011). This algorithm optimized segmentation and tracing of the VTA and SNc masks to account for intensity inhomogeneities by comparing signal intensity changes from voxel to voxel. Boundaries of the midbrain structures were established according to atlases and the segmentation algorithm was run for every section in the area to produce a 3D-labeled volume map of the VTA and SNc (Eapen et al., 2011). The BOLD time courses were averaged spatially over each of the VTA and SNc seeds. For individual subjects, we computed the correlation coefficient between the averaged time course of each seed region and the time courses of all other brain voxels. To assess and compare rsFC, we converted these image maps, which were not normally distributed, to z score maps by Fisher’s z transform (Jenkins and Watts, 1968; Berry and Mielke, 2000): z = 0.5 loge[(1 + r)/(1 − r)]. The Z maps were used in group random effect analyses. We performed one-sample t-test each on the Z maps of the VTA and SNc and paired-sample t-test comparing the two Z maps. A threshold of voxel p < 0.05, corrected for family-wise error of multiple comparisons on the basis of Gaussian Random Field theory was used to report the results of one-sample and paired-sample t-tests. Whole brain regression analysis with age and two sample t-test comparing men and women were performed to examine the effect of age and gender each for VTA and SNc. A threshold combining voxel p < 0.001, uncorrected and cluster p < 0.05, corrected for family-wise error of multiple comparisons was used to report age and gender findings.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Seed regions: the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc).

Results

For each seed region, we performed one-sample t-test of the Z maps across the group (Figures 2A,B). The VTA and SNc exhibited positive connectivity with the dorsomedial PFC, ventral striatum, thalamus, putamen, pallidum, insula, posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), inferior temporal cortex (ITC), anterior parahippocampal gyrus (PHG), midbrain and large areas of the cerebellum. Both nuclei demonstrated negative connectivity with the occipital cortex, posterior parietal cortex (PPC), precuneus, middle/superior temporal cortex and posterior PHG. These findings replicate earlier rsFC studies of the two dopaminergic structures (Murty et al., 2014; Tomasi and Volkow, 2014; Zhang S. et al., 2016).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Whole brain functional connectivity of the VTA (A) and SNc (B) one-sample t-test, p < 0.05, FWE corrected. Warm color: positive correlation; cool color: negative correlation. Neurological orientation: R = right.

Differences in rsFC of the VTA and SNc

We performed a paired t-test to compare functional connectivity of the VTA and SNc (Figure 3). Compared with the VTA, the SNc showed greater connectivity to the thalamus, midbrain, PHG, amygdala, insula and left cerebellum and less connectivity to bilateral angular gyri, left temporal gyrus, bilateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), ACC and a midbrain region likely including the red nucleus (Table 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Differences in whole brain functional connectivity of the VTA vs. SNc: paired-sample t-test, p < 0.05 FWE corrected. Warm color: VTA > SNc; cool color: SNc > VTA. Neurological orientation: R, right. AG, angular gyrus; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; STS, superior temporal sulcus.

Table 2.

Regions showing differences in functional connectivity to ventral tegmental area (VTA) and to substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc).

Volume (mm3) Peak voxel (Z) MNI coordinate (mm) Side Identified brain regions
x y z
VTA > SNc
  2349 Inf 3 −19 −11 L/R Midbrain (Possibly including red nucleus)
  7317 Inf −48 −58 34 L Angular gyrus/STS
  33,831 Inf −30 56 1 L SFG/MFG/OFC/ACC
  9855 7.49 30 62 4 R SFG/MFG/OFC
  3429 7.21 18 26 52 R Superior frontal gyrus
  2673 6.61 −66 −31 −17 L Middle temporal gyrus
  3321 6.42 48 −55 31 R Angular gyrus
SNc > VTA
  46,440 Inf 12 −22 −14 R Thalamus/Midbrain/PHG/Amygdala/Insula
Inf −12 −22 −11 L Thalamus/Midbrain/PHG/Amygdala/Insula
  3645 7.71 −33 −37 −32 L Cerebellum

Note: voxel p < 0.05, FWE and cluster > 50 voxels; R, right; L, left; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; OFC, orbitofrontal cortex; PHG, parahippocampal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; STS, superior temporal sulcus.

Age-Related Changes in rsFC of the VTA and SNc

For each seed region we performed a whole brain regression of Z maps against age for the entire group, as well as for men and women separately. For men and women combined, VTA connectivity to bilateral superior temporal gyri, parahippocampus and cerebellum showed positive correlations with age and connectivity to the left central sulcus and postcentral gyrus showed negative correlations with age (Figure 4, Table 3). For men and women combined, the SNc connectivity to the bilateral superior temporal gyrus, bilateral parahippocampus, left cerebellum and right inferior parietal cortex showed positive correlations with age. No negative correlations with age were identified (Figure 5, Table 3). When men were examined separately, VTA connectivity to bilateral superior temporal gyri/parahippocampus and left cerebellum showed positive correlations with age (Figure 4, Table 4), and SNc connectivity to precuneus, right inferior parietal cortex and bilateral cerebellum showed positive correlation with age (Figure 5, Table 4). In men only too, SNc connectivity to the left superior parietal gyrus and left precentral/postcentral gyrus showed negative correlations with age (Figure 5, Table 4). The women only group did not show age-related changes in VTA or SNc connectivities.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Brain areas where functional connectivity to the VTA correlates positively (red) and negatively (blue) with age in (A) men and women combined and in (B) men and (C) women separately. Voxel-level p < 0.001 uncorrected and cluster-level p < 0.05, FWE. PCG, Post-central gyrus; PHG, Parahippocampal gyrus; STG, Superior temporal gyrus.

Table 3.

Regions showing age effects on VTA and SNc connectivity (men and women combined).

Volume (mm3) Peak voxel (Z) MNI coordinate (mm) Side Identified brain regions
x y z
VTA (positive correlation)
  8073 6.03 30 11 −35 R Superior temporal gyrus
4.75 27 5 −29 R Parahippocampal gyrus (PHG)
  6642 5.51 −27 11 −35 L Superior temporal gyrus/PHG
  3780 4.38 −27 −52 −26 R Cerebellum
  1269 4.26 39 −52 −26 L Cerebellum
VTA (negative correlation)
  1215 3.89 −39 −22 55 L Central sulcus
3.70 −57 −22 49 L Postcentral gyrus
SNc (positive correlation)
  1809 5.35 −18 2 −32 L Superior temporal gyrus/PHG
  2808 4.77 27 11 −38 R Superior temporal gyrus/PHG
  2106 4.13 −30 −64 −23 L Cerebellum
  1134 3.79 54 −49 40 R Angular gyrus
SNc (negative correlation)
  None

Note: voxel p < 0.001 uncorrected and cluster-level p < 0.05, FWE; R, right; L, left; PHG, Parahippocampal Gyrus.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Brain areas where functional connectivity to the SNc correlates positively (red) and negatively (blue) with age in (A) men and women combined and in (B) men and (C) women separately. Voxel-level p < 0.001 uncorrected and cluster-level p < 0.05, FWE. PCG, Postcentral gyrus; PrCG, Precentral gyrus; PHG, Parahippocampal gyrus; SPG, Superior parietal gyrus; STG, Superior temporal gyrus.

Table 4.

Regions showing age effects on VTA and SNc connectivity for (A) men and (B) women separately.

Volume (mm3) Peak voxel (Z) MNI coordinate (mm) Side Identified brain regions
x y z
A. Men only
VTA (positive correlation)
  3510 5.29 −33 −7 −29 L Superior temporal gyrus/ PHG
  4077 4.84 27 11 −38 R Superior temporal gyrus/ PHG
  1890 3.96 −21 −55 −23 L Cerebellum
VTA (negative correlation)
None
SNc (positive correlation)
  1620 5.60 9 −61 43 L/R Precuneus/Superior parietal gyrus
  4239 4.87 51 −49 49 R Intraparietal sulcus
  1485 4.55 42 −70 43 R Angular gyrus
  1539 4.52 −21 −34 −41 L Cerebellum
  1350 4.34 42 −43 −44 R Cerebellum
  2052 4.13 −24 −67 −47 R Cerebellum
  1053 3.91 −33 −52 −23 L Cerebellum
SNc (negative correlation)
  1053 4.39 −38 −91 34 L Superior parietal gyrus
  1404 4.20 −33 −25 70 L Precentral/Postcentral gyrus
B. Women only
None significant

Note: voxel p < 0.001 uncorrected and cluster-level p < 0.05, FWE; R, right; L, left. PHG, Parahippocampal Gyrus.

Gender Differences in rsFC of the VTA and SNc

To compare gender differences in VTA and SNc connectivity we performed a two-sample t-test of the Z maps of men and women. Compared to women, men showed greater connectivity of the VTA to the left posterior orbital gyrus (x = −33, y = 23, z = −17; Z = 5.12, 1674 mm3). Men also showed greater connectivity of the SNc to the left posterior orbital gyrus (x = −39, y = 20, z = −23; Z = 4.44, 1296 mm3). Compared to men, women did not show higher connectivity in any regions at the same threshold (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Brain areas showing differences in rsFC between genders. Connectivity of both the VTA and SNc to the left posterior orbital frontal gyrus is higher in men than in women. Voxel-level p < 0.001 uncorrected and cluster-level p < 0.05, FWE.

In linear regressions, we identified regional connectivity to the VTA and SNc showing age-related changes in men but not women. Thus, we tested for slope difference between men and women in these linear regressions against age for each of the brain regions—three for VTA and nine regions for SNc connectivity (Table 4). The results showed that, at a corrected threshold (p < 0.05/12 = 0.004), all except the cerebellum cluster with age-related change in VTA connectivity (−21, −55, −23) demonstrated a significant slope difference (p’s < 0.0029, Zar, 1999).

Discussion

VTA and SNc Connectivity

We discussed differences in VTA and SNc connectivity, drawing from a broad literature of functional characteristics of the individual brain regions that show differences in VTA and SNc connectivity and of clinical neuroscience of dopaminergic dysfunction.

Compared with the SNc, the VTA showed higher connectivity to cortical structures including the SFG, middle frontal gyrus (MFG) and angular gyrus. Findings of VTA connectivity to frontal structures are consistent with a role of the mesocortical systems in supporting executive function (Haber and Fudge, 1997; Haber and Knutson, 2010). The SFG is involved in cognitive motor control (Li et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2016) and the maintenance (D’Esposito et al., 1998) as well as retrieval (Karlsgodt et al., 2005; Ford et al., 2011) of memory. Methylphenidate, a DA reuptake inhibitor, enhanced activity of the SFG during visual attention and working memory tasks (Tomasi et al., 2011). The MFG, specifically the right MFG, regulates the interaction of goal directed and stimulus-driven attention (Fox et al., 2006). In a patient with right MFG resection, removal of exogenous stimuli was followed by difficulty in reverting back to top-down control (Japee et al., 2015). Thus, greater VTA than SNc connectivity to the SFG and MFG perhaps suggests a more important role of the VTA in dopaminergic regulation of these executive functions.

The angular and temporal gyri are part of the default mode network (DMN; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014) and VTA connectivity to these regions is consistent with studies implicating dopaminergic regulation of DMN activity (Nagano-Saito et al., 2008; Kelly et al., 2009; Tomasi et al., 2009, 2011) and altered DMN activity in neuropsychiatric illnesses that involve DA dysfunction (Berridge and Robinson, 1998; Roberts and Wallis, 2000; Zago et al., 2008; Volkow et al., 2009; Barbey et al., 2012; Groman and Jentsch, 2012; Lau et al., 2013). Dopaminergic medications such as methylphenidate (Tomasi et al., 2011) and L-DOPA (Kelly et al., 2009) as well as transient DA depletion (Nagano-Saito et al., 2008) alter DMN activity. In another study, DA transporter availability correlated positively with DMN activity during visual attention (Tomasi et al., 2009). In a dimensional change card sorting task the VTA but not the SNc was strongly connected to the cognitive control network during task engagement (Ezekiel et al., 2013). Thus, along with the latter work, the current findings suggest that the VTA but not the SNc may regulate DMN activity and task engagement.

The SNc displayed stronger connectivity to the amygdala, PHG, thalamus, insula and cerebellum in comparison to the VTA, consistent with findings from Tomasi and Volkow (2014) and anatomical projections of the SNc (Carpenter et al., 1976; Beckstead et al., 1979; Zahm and Trimble, 2008; Malenka et al., 2009; Haber and Knutson, 2010). SNc connectivity to the thalamus and cerebellum may support the striatal/cerebellar thalamic cortical circuit for motor control (Haber and Knutson, 2010) and a neural mechanism of tremor in PD (Dirkx et al., 2016). Further, dysfunctional cerebellar cortical circuits have been linked to cognitive and motor impairment in the elderly (Bernard et al., 2013) and DA depletion may contribute to functional deterioration of cerebellar cortical circuits, a pathology associated with increased tremor severity in patients with Holmes’ tumor (Seidel et al., 2009; Kishore et al., 2014). Stronger SNc than VTA connectivity to the cerebellum supports a subcortical mechanism for DA to regulate cerebellar functions.

The insula processes interoceptive information (Gasquoine, 2014) and responds to salient events (Menon and Uddin, 2010; Sterzer and Kleinschmidt, 2010). In Granger causality analysis and structural equation modeling, altered connectivity of the right insula (as in schizophrenia patients) may contribute to multiple network dysfunctions that lead to aberrant salience responses (Moran et al., 2013). In neuronal recordings from behaving monkeys, VTA neurons respond to reward-predicting stimulus only while the SNc neurons respond to both reward and punishment predicting stimuli (Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2009). Human fMRI demonstrated similar results (D’Ardenne et al., 2013). These findings are consistent with connectivity between the SNc and insula in mediating salience responses irrespective of motivational valence. Of note, impaired interoceptive sensitivity is a non-motor symptom of PD and fatigue in PD is associated with anti-correlated metabolic changes of the saliency network involving the right insula and DMN (Cho et al., 2017).

As discussed earlier, the SNc responds to both positive and negative motivational signals. Thus, stronger positive SNc connectivity to the amygdala suggests a role of the SNc in responding to salient events and perhaps particularly those that predict a negative outcome, furnishing a mechanism whereby the SNc mediates behavioral aversion. The central amygdala projection to the SNc but not VTA may support the encoding of prediction error in appetitive conditioning (Lee et al., 2010). Amygdala hypofunction is postulated to occur with SNc degeneration (Braak et al., 1994), leading to various deficits in emotion processing (Sprengelmeyer et al., 2003) in so-called “amygdala syndrome” in PD (Diederich et al., 2016). In animals, administration of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) destroys DA neurons in the SNc and attenuates memory retention in contextual fear conditioning, a process that requires an intact amygdala (Kinoshita et al., 2015). Together, these findings are consistent with a stronger SNc than VTA connectivity to the amgydala and with the relevance of the SNc amygdala circuit to learning and memory.

PHG activity is regulated by DA (Christopher et al., 2015) and critical to the processing of contextual information and memory formation (Diana et al., 2007). Patients with PD exhibit memory impairment along with reduced DAD2 receptor levels in the right PHG (Christopher et al., 2015). The current finding indicates a stronger SNc than VTA connectivity to the PHG, suggesting that degeneration of SNc DA neurons accompanied with disrupted SNc-PHG connectivity may contribute to learning and memory impairment in PD.

Age-Related Changes in VTA and SNc rsFC

Increased VTA and SNc Connectivity to DMN in Older Adults

The DMN is “deactivated” during task performance, in comparison to resting, mind wondering and self-referential processes (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Grady et al., 2010; Roski et al., 2013). With increasing age throughout adulthood, the degree of DMN deactivation is reduced and the DMN and task-positive network (TPN) become less anti-correlated during cognitive engagement (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Grady et al., 2010; Roski et al., 2013). For instance, the DMN is most strongly deactivated during tasks with the magnitude of deactivation corresponding to task difficulty during auditory target detection (Kelly et al., 2008). In an Eriksen flanker task the degree of antiphase correlation between the DMN and TPN was associated with performance consistency (McKiernan et al., 2003). In both studies older adults demonstrate altered DMN activity in association with behavioral decline (McKiernan et al., 2003; Kelly et al., 2008). Here, in support of these earlier findings, we demonstrated weaker negative connectivity of the VTA and SNc to the temporal/PHG—part of the DMN (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014)—with increasing age.

Transient DA depletion was associated with less deactivation of the temporal lobe during a cognitive task (Nagano-Saito et al., 2008). In contrast, methylphenidate facilitates temporal cortical deactivation during visual attention and working memory, as compared to placebo (Tomasi et al., 2011). There is considerable evidence that DA plays a role in regulating DMN activity (Nagano-Saito et al., 2008; Tomasi et al., 2009, 2011) and that DA systems deteriorate in healthy aging (Morgan et al., 1987; Watanabe, 1987; Kish et al., 1992; Volkow et al., 2000; Rollo, 2009; Bäckman et al., 2010; Martorana and Koch, 2014; Shingai et al., 2014). Therefore, age-related changes of DA signaling and VTA/SNc connectivity may support reduced task-related suppression of DMN activity in older adults.

Increased VTA and SNc Connectivity to the Cerebellum in Older Adults

Age-related changes in cerebellar structure and function may contribute to cognitive decline in the elderly (Bernard and Seidler, 2014). Cerebellar motor and cognitive functions are anatomically mediated by projections to motor and non-motor cortical areas via the thalamus (Brodal, 1978; Schmahmann and Pandya, 1997). For instance, our previous study identified a cerbello-thalamo-cortical circuit that supports post-error slowing, a critical component of cognitive control (Ide and Li, 2011). Decreased connectivity in cerebellar cortical networks correlated with age-related decrement in working memory, task switching and visuomotor adaptation (Bernard et al., 2013). In PD, regional homogeneity of the cerebellum is increased compared to healthy controls (Wu et al., 2009). During healthy aging, changes in cerebellar activity was linked to motor performance (Kishore et al., 2014). Remediation of motor function has been demonstrated by cerebellar inhibition during paired associative stimulation (PAS) to induce neural plasticity (Kishore et al., 2014). Enhanced motor cortical response to PAS in the elderly could also be achieved by administration of L-DOPA (Kishore et al., 2014). This suggests that decreased DA may contribute to age-related reductions in motor cortical responsiveness to PAS. Thus, cerebellar activity relates to cognitive and motor performance and the decline of these functions during healthy aging may occur because of DA deficiency (Kishore et al., 2014). In support, methylphenidate reduces VTA/SNc connectivity to the cerebellum (Kline et al., 2016). Together, the findings are in accord with age-related reduction in DA in association with increased VTA/SNc connectivity to the cerebellum.

Increased SNc Connectivity to the Right Inferior Parietal Lobule in Older Adults

The right inferior parietal lobule (rIPL) is involved in the detection of salient events and sustaining attention towards task goals (Häger et al., 1998; Clark et al., 2000; Adler et al., 2001; Bunzeck and Düzel, 2006; Singh-Curry and Husain, 2009). Lesions of the rIPL result in attentional impairment (Rueckert and Grafman, 1996, 1998). Other work demonstrated that rIPL activity and connectivity changes with age (Grady et al., 2010; Hu et al., 2012). Thus, age-related changes in SNc-rIPL connectivity may influence saliency processing in older adults. As described earlier, both the SNc and rIPL mediate salience responses (Clark et al., 2000; Bunzeck and Düzel, 2006; Diekhof et al., 2009; Matsumoto and Hikosaka, 2009; D’Ardenne et al., 2013). Older adults directed attention towards a salient stimulus while younger adults only paid attention to contextually relevant information (Schmitt et al., 2015). Indeed, an earlier fMRI study showed that healthy aging is associated with a broad increase in rIPL activity to externally driven events (Hu et al., 2012). Thus, changes in SNc-rIPL connectivity likely contribute to age-related changes in saliency processing.

Sex Differences in VTA/SNc rsFC

A key sex difference is a stronger rsFC between the VTA and SNc to the left inferior frontal gyrus, pars orbitalis (IFGo, [−33, 23, −17] for VTA and [−39, 20, −23] for SNc) in men vs. women. Studies have linked activations of the left IFGo to response inhibition (Roberts and Wallis, 2000; Swick et al., 2008; Barbey et al., 2012). The OFC responds to reward uncertainty in men performing a gambling task (Abler et al., 2009), a response that appeared to be attenuated by methylphenidate vs. placebo (Schlösser et al., 2009). In an rsFC study examining risk propensity, women demonstrated lower risk propensity along with higher functional connectivity density (FCD) in the left inferior OFC ([−36, 36, −15] and [−42, 36, −18] each for long and short range FCD; Zhou et al., 2014). The authors concluded that connectivity differences of the left inferior OFC contributed to sex-differences in risk propensity. Although not always or directly implicating the OFC in the regulation of risk-taking tendency, other studies have linked DA to decision making during uncertain situations (Schultz et al., 2008). With DA levels chronically augmented by L-DOPA, participants were more likely to engage in risky choices than control subjects (Rutledge et al., 2015), a known side effect of dopaminergic medication treatment of PD (Averbeck et al., 2014). Together, to the extent that we could relate these findings on the IFGo and OFC, stronger VTA/SNc connectivity may represent suppression of orbitofrontal functions and provide a neural mechanism to support greater risk propensity and vulnerability to substance misuse (Kuhn, 2015) in men than women.

Sex Differences in Age Related Effects

There were sex differences in age-related changes in SNc connectivity to bilateral precuneus, right angular gyrus and right cerebellum. Both the precuneus and angular gyrus are part of the DMN (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2014) and men but not women showed age-related increase in connectivity to the SNc. A previous work of rsFC showed stronger regional homogeneity (ReHo) in the precuneus in men than women (Xu et al., 2015). In contrast to women, men also showed age-related increase in SNc connectivity with the cerebellum. In a previous section, we discussed the role of the cerebellum in motor and cognitive tasks and also the link between cerebellar function and DA. Brain regions that showed age effects in both men and women were for the right and left cerebellum for VTA and left cerebellum only for SNc. Our comparison of sex differences in age-related changes identified an increase in SNc connectivity to the right cerebellum in men but not women. Thus, this difference in SNc-cerebellar connectivity which emerged as a sex effect on age-related changes may represent a subtle distinction in how male and female cerebellar function changes through adulthood (Zhang C. et al., 2016).

Limitations of the Study and Conclusions

Several limitations should be considered for the study. First, we could not study the functional implications of the current connectivity findings because participants were not assessed for neurocognitive performance. Second, although we reported age-related effects, this sample included only young and middle-aged adults and the findings should be considered specific to this age range. The findings may not generalize to the elderly or clinical conditions that occur primarily in the elderly. Third, although we included multiple data sets in order to have the largest possible sample size, the issue of how site-specific variables, such as different gender ratios across study sites, may impact the current findings need to be considered. In a recent study where we investigated hemispheric lateralization of the rsFC of the ventral striatum, we showed that analyses restricted to our own data set (n = 106) were consistently replicated in the Beijing-Zang data set (n = 97; Zhang et al., 2017). Fourth, graph theoretical measures may provide new information regarding age-related changes in network properties and may complement findings from the current, seed-based analyses (Zhang C. et al., 2016). Finally, we did not propose specific hypotheses and the study is exploratory. These important issues need to be addressed in future work. In particular, by characterizing the target regions that showed differential connectivity to the VTA and SNc, the findings may facilitate molecular imaging to examine the relationship between rsFC and dopaminergic signaling in the brain.

In summary, we demonstrated both shared and distinct patterns of cerebral functional connectivity of the VTA and SNc. There are also important gender differences in the rsFC of these midbrain nuclei. Age-related changes in the rsFC appeared to be more prominent in men than in women. These findings may add to the systems and clinical neuroscience literature of the dopaminergic system.

Author Contributions

SZ and CRL contributed to study design. SZ and SH contributed to data collection and analysis. AP, SZ, SH, HHC and CRL contributed to literature review and writing of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants AA021449, DA026990, DA023248 and K25DA040032, as well as the Peter McManus Charitable Trust. The study was also conducted as a summer fellowship program supported by the Frank H. Netter M.D. School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University. The funding agencies are otherwise not involved in the study or in the decision to publish the findings. We declare no financial interests in the current work.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abler B., Herrnberger B., Grön G., Spitzer M. (2009). From uncertainty to reward: BOLD characteristics differentiate signaling pathways. BMC Neurosci. 10:154. 10.1186/1471-2202-10-154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adler C. M., Sax K. W., Holland S. K., Schmithorst V., Rosenberg L., Strakowski S. M. (2001). Changes in neuronal activation with increasing attention demand in healthy volunteers: an fMRI study. Synapse 42, 266–272. 10.1002/syn.1112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anand A., Li Y., Wang Y., Wu J., Gao S., Bukhari L., et al. (2005). Activity and connectivity of brain mood regulating circuit in depression: a functional magnetic resonance study. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 1079–1088. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrews-Hanna J. R., Smallwood J., Spreng R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control and clinical relevance. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1316, 29–52. 10.1111/nyas.12360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Andrews-Hanna J. R., Snyder A. Z., Vincent J. L., Lustig C., Head D., Raichle M. E., et al. (2007). Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron 56, 924–935. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashburner J., Friston K. J. (1999). Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 7, 254–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Averbeck B. B., O’Sullivan S. S., Djamshidian A. (2014). Impulsive and compulsive behaviors in Parkinson’s disease. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10, 553–580. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bäckman L., Lindenberger U., Li S. C., Nyberg L. (2010). Linking cognitive aging to alterations in dopamine neurotransmitter functioning: recent data and future avenues. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34, 670–677. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bannon M. J., Whitty C. J. (1997). Age-related and regional differences in dopamine transporter mRNA expression in human midbrain. Neurology 48, 969–977. 10.1212/WNL.48.4.969 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Barbey A. K., Colom R., Solomon J., Krueger F., Forbes C., Grafman J. (2012). An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping. Brain 135, 1154–1164. 10.1093/brain/aws021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Beckstead R. M., Domesick V. B., Nauta W. J. (1979). Efferent connections of the substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area in the rat. Brain Res. 175, 191–217. 10.1016/0006-8993(79)91001-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Beltz A. M., Berenbaum S. A., Wilson S. J. (2015). Sex differences in resting state brain function of cigarette smokers and links to nicotine dependence. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 23, 247–254. 10.1037/pha0000033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernard J. A., Peltier S. J., Wiggins J. L., Jaeggi S. M., Buschkuehl M., Fling B. W., et al. (2013). Disrupted cortico-cerebellar connectivity in older adults. NeuroImage 83, 103–119. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bernard J. A., Seidler R. D. (2014). Moving forward: age effects on the cerebellum underlie cognitive and motor declines. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 42, 193–207. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Berridge K. C., Robinson T. E. (1998). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res. Rev. 28, 309–369. 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00019-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Berry K. J., Mielke P. W., Jr. (2000). A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions. Psychol. Rep. 87, 1101–1114. 10.2466/pr0.87.7.1101-1114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Biswal B. B., Mennes M., Zuo X. N., Gohel S., Kelly C., Smith S. M., et al. (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 107, 4734–4739. 10.1073/pnas.0911855107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Braak H., Braak E., Yilmazer D., de Vos R. A., Jansen E. N., Bohl J., et al. (1994). Amygdala pathology in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 88, 493–500. 10.1007/bf00296485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Braak H., Del Tredici K., Rub U., de Vos R. A., Jansen Steur E. N., Braak E. (2003). Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 24, 197–211. 10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Brodal P. (1978). The corticopontine projection in the rhesus monkey. Brain 101, 251–283. 10.1093/brain/101.2.251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bromberg-Martin E. S., Matsumoto M., Hikosaka O. (2010). Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive and alerting. Neuron 68, 815–834. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bunzeck N., Düzel E. (2006). Absolute coding of stimulus novelty in the human substantia nigra/VTA. Neuron 51, 369–379. 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.06.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Byrnes J. P., Miller D. C., Schafer W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 125, 367–383. 10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Carpenter M. B., Nakano K., Kim R. (1976). Nigrothalamic projections in the monkey demonstrated by autoradiographic technics. J. Comp. Neurol. 165, 401–415. 10.1002/cne.901650402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cho S. S., Aminian K., Li C., Lang A. E., Houle S., Strafella A. P. (2017). Fatigue in Parkinson’s disease: the contribution of cerebral metabolic changes. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38, 283–292. 10.1002/hbm.23360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Christopher L., Duff-Canning S., Koshimori Y., Segura B., Boileau I., Chen R., et al. (2015). Salience network and parahippocampal dopamine dysfunction in memory-impaired Parkinson disease. Ann. Neurol. 77, 269–280. 10.1002/ana.24323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clark V. P., Fannon S., Lai S., Benson R., Bauer L. (2000). Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. J. Neurophysiol. 83, 3133–3139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cools R., D’Esposito M. (2011). Inverted-U-shaped dopamine actions on human working memory and cognitive control. Biol. Psychiatry 69, e113–e125. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cordes D., Haughton V. M., Arfanakis K., Carew J. D., Turski P. A., Moritz C. H., et al. (2001). Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in “resting-state” data. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22, 1326–1333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Croson R., Gneezy U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. J. Econ. Lit. 47, 448–474. 10.1257/jel.47.2.448 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Danjo T., Yoshimi K., Funabiki K., Yawata S., Nakanishi S. (2014). Aversive behavior induced by optogenetic inactivation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons is mediated by dopamine D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 111, 6455–6460. 10.1073/pnas.1404323111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. D’Ardenne K., Lohrenz T., Bartley K. A., Montague P. R. (2013). Computational heterogeneity in the human mesencephalic dopamine system. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 13, 747–756. 10.3758/s13415-013-0191-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. DeLong M. R., Crutcher M. D., Georgopoulos A. P. (1983). Relations between movement and single cell discharge in the substantia nigra of the behaving monkey. J. Neurosci. 3, 1599–1606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. D’Esposito M., Aguirre G. K., Zarahn E., Ballard D., Shin R. K., Lease J. (1998). Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 7, 1–13. 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00004-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Diana R. A., Yonelinas A. P., Ranganath C. (2007). Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: a three-component model. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 379–386. 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Diederich N. J., Goldman J. G., Stebbins G. T., Goetz C. G. (2016). Failing as doorman and disc jockey at the same time: amygdalar dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 31, 11–22. 10.1002/mds.26460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Diekhof E. K., Falkai P., Gruber O. (2009). Functional interactions guiding adaptive processing of behavioral significance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 3325–3331. 10.1002/hbm.20754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Dirkx M. F., den Ouden H., Aarts E., Timmer M., Bloem B. R., Toni I., et al. (2016). The cerebral network of Parkinson’s tremor: an effective connectivity fMRI study. J. Neurosci. 36, 5362–5372. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3634-15.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Düzel E., Bunzeck N., Guitart-Masip M., Wittmann B., Schott B. H., Tobler P. N. (2009). Functional imaging of the human dopaminergic midbrain. Trends Neurosci. 32, 321–328. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Eapen M., Zald D. H., Gatenby J. C., Ding Z., Gore J. C. (2011). Using high-resolution MR imaging at 7T to evaluate the anatomy of the midbrain dopaminergic system. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32, 688–694. 10.3174/ajnr.A2355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Eaton N. R., Keyes K. M., Krueger R. F., Balsis S., Skodol A. E., Markon K. E., et al. (2012). An invariant dimensional liability model of gender differences in mental disorder prevalence: evidence from a national sample. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 121, 282–288. 10.1037/a0024780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ezekiel F., Bosma R., Morton J. B. (2013). Dimensional change card sort performance associated with age-related differences in functional connectivity of lateral prefrontal cortex. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 5, 40–50. 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fair D. A., Schlaggar B. L., Cohen A. L., Miezin F. M., Dosenbach N. U., Wenger K. K., et al. (2007). A method for using blocked and event-related fMRI data to study “resting state” functional connectivity. NeuroImage 35, 396–405. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Ford J. H., Addis D. R., Giovanello K. S. (2011). Differential neural activity during search of specific and general autobiographical memories elicited by musical cues. Neuropsychologia 49, 2514–2526. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.04.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fox M. D., Corbetta M., Snyder A. Z., Vincent J. L., Raichle M. E. (2006). Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 103, 10046–100051. 10.1073/pnas.0604187103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fox M. D., Raichle M. E. (2007). Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 700–711. 10.1038/nrn2201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Fox M. D., Snyder A. Z., Vincent J. L., Corbetta M., Van Essen D. C., Raichle M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 102, 9673–9678. 10.1073/pnas.0504136102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Friend D. M., Kravitz A. V. (2014). Working together: basal ganglia pathways in action selection. Trends Neurosci. 37, 301–303. 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Friston K., Ashburner J., Frith C. D., Poline J., Heather J. D., Frackowiak R. S. (1995). Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 3, 165–189. 10.1002/hbm.460030303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gasquoine P. G. (2014). Contributions of the insula to cognition and emotion. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24, 77–87. 10.1007/s11065-014-9246-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gong G., He Y., Evans A. C. (2011). Brain connectivity: gender makes a difference. Neuroscientist 17, 575–591. 10.1177/1073858410386492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Goto Y., Lee Y. A., Yamaguchi Y., Jas E. (2016). Biological mechanisms underlying evolutionary origins of psychotic and mood disorders. Neurosci. Res. 111, 13–24. 10.1016/j.neures.2016.04.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Grady C. L., Protzner A. B., Kovacevic N., Strother S. C., Afshin-Pour B., Wojtowicz M., et al. (2010). A multivariate analysis of age-related differences in default mode and task-positive networks across multiple cognitive domains. Cereb. Cortex 20, 1432–1447. 10.1093/cercor/bhp207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Greicius M. D., Flores B. H., Menon V., Glover G. H., Solvason H. B., Kenna H., et al. (2007). Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 429–437. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Groman S. M., Jentsch J. D. (2012). Cognitive control and the dopamine D2-like receptor: a dimensional understanding of addiction. Depress Anxiety 29, 295–306. 10.1002/da.20897 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Haber S. N., Fudge J. L. (1997). The primate substantia nigra and VTA: integrative circuitry and function. Crit. Rev. Neurobiol. 11, 323–342. 10.1615/critrevneurobiol.v11.i4.40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Haber S. N., Knutson B. (2010). The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 4–26. 10.1038/npp.2009.129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Häger F., Volz H. P., Gaser C., Mentzel H. J., Kaiser W. A., Sauer H. (1998). Challenging the anterior attentional system with a continuous performance task: a functional magnetic resonance imaging approach. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 248, 161–170. 10.1007/s004060050034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Hazy T. E., Frank M. J., O’Reilly R. C. (2006). Banishing the homunculus: making working memory work. Neuroscience 139, 105–118. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hoeft F., Watson C. L., Kesler S. R., Bettinger K. E., Reiss A. L. (2008). Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play. J. Psychiatr. Res. 42, 253–258. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2007.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hu S., Chao H. H., Winkler A. D., Li C. S. (2012). The effects of age on cerebral activations: internally versus externally driven processes. Front. Aging Neurosci. 4:4. 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hu S., Ide J. S., Zhang S., Li C. R. (2016). The right superior frontal gyrus and individual variation in proactive control of impulsive response. J. Neurosci. 36, 12688–12696. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1175-16.2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ide J. S., Li C. S. (2011). A cerebellar thalamic cortical circuit for error-related cognitive control. NeuroImage 54, 455–464. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Japee S., Holiday K., Satyshur M. D., Mukai I., Ungerleider L. G. (2015). A role of right middle frontal gyrus in reorienting of attention: a case study. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 9:23. 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jenkins G. M., Watts D. G. (1968). Spectral Analysis and Its Applications. San Francisco: Holden-Day. [Google Scholar]
  66. Karlsgodt K. H., Shirinyan D., van Erp T. G., Cohen M. S., Cannon T. D. (2005). Hippocampal activations during encoding and retrieval in a verbal working memory paradigm. NeuroImage 25, 1224–1231. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kelly C., de Zubicaray G., Di Martino A., Copland D. A., Reiss P. T., Klein D. F., et al. (2009). L-dopa modulates functional connectivity in striatal cognitive and motor networks: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J. Neurosci. 29, 7364–7378. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0810-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kelly A. M., Uddin L. Q., Biswal B. B., Castellanos F. X., Milham M. P. (2008). Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. NeuroImage 39, 527–537. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kinoshita K., Tada Y., Muroi Y., Unno T., Ishii T. (2015). Selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta after systemic administration of MPTP facilitates extinction learning. Life Sci. 137, 28–36. 10.1016/j.lfs.2015.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kish S. J., Shannak K., Rajput A., Deck J. H., Hornykiewicz O. (1992). Aging produces a specific pattern of striatal dopamine loss: implications for the etiology of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 58, 642–648. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09766.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kishore A., Popa T., James P., Yahia-Cherif L., Backer F., Varughese Chacko L., et al. (2014). Age-related decline in the responsiveness of motor cortex to plastic forces reverses with levodopa or cerebellar stimulation. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 2541–2551. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kline R. L., Zhang S., Farr O. M., Hu S., Zaborszky L., Samanez-Larkin G. R., et al. (2016). The effects of methylphenidate on resting-state functional connectivity of the basal nucleus of meynert, locus coeruleus and ventral tegmental area in healthy adults. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:149. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Koepp M. J., Gunn R. N., Lawrence A. D., Cunningham V. J., Dagher A., Jones T., et al. (1998). Evidence for striatal dopamine release during a video game. Nature 393, 266–268. 10.1038/30498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kuhn C. (2015). Emergence of sex differences in the development of substance use and abuse during adolescence. Pharmacol. Ther. 153, 55–78. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2015.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lau C. I., Wang H. C., Hsu J. L., Liu M. E. (2013). Does the dopamine hypothesis explain schizophrenia? Rev. Neurosci. 24, 389–400. 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Laviolette S. R., Lipski W. J., Grace A. A. (2005). A subpopulation of neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex encodes emotional learning with burst and frequency codes through a dopamine D4 receptor-dependent basolateral amygdala input. J. Neurosci. 25, 6066–6075. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1168-05.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee H. J., Gallagher M., Holland P. C. (2010). The central amygdala projection to the substantia nigra reflects prediction error information in appetitive conditioning. Learn. Mem. 17, 531–538. 10.1101/lm.1889510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li R., Wu X., Chen K., Fleisher A. S., Reiman E. M., Yao L. (2013). Alterations of directional connectivity among resting-state networks in Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34, 340–345. 10.3174/ajnr.a3197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li C. R., Zhang S., Duann J., Yan P., Sinha R., Mazure C. M. (2009). Gender differences in cognitive control: an extended investigation of the stop signal task. Brain Imaging Behav. 3, 262–276. 10.1007/s11682-009-9068-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lodge D. J. (2011). The medial prefrontal and orbitofrontal cortices differentially regulate dopamine system function. Neuropsychopharmacology 36, 1227–1236. 10.1038/npp.2011.7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lowe M. J., Mock B. J., Sorenson J. A. (1998). Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. NeuroImage 7, 119–132. 10.1006/nimg.1997.0315 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Malenka R., Nestler E., Hyman S. (2009). “Chapter 6: widely projecting systems: monoamines, acetylcholine and orexi,” in Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience, 2nd Edn., eds Sydor A., Brown R. Y. (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; ), 147–148. [Google Scholar]
  83. Martorana A., Koch G. (2014). “Is dopamine involved in Alzheimer’s disease?” Front. Aging Neurosci. 6:252. 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Matsumoto M., Hikosaka O. (2009). Two types of dopamine neuron distinctly convey positive and negative motivational signals. Nature 459, 837–841. 10.1038/nature08028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. McKiernan K. A., Kaufman J. N., Kucera-Thompson J., Binder J. R. (2003). A parametric manipulation of factors affecting task-induced deactivation in functional neuroimaging. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 394–408. 10.1162/089892903321593117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Menon V., Uddin L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 655–667. 10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mink J. W. (1996). The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog. Neurobiol. 50, 381–425. 10.1016/s0301-0082(96)00042-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Moran L. V., Tagamets M. A., Sampath H., O’Donnell A., Stein E. A., Kochunov P., et al. (2013). Disruption of anterior insula modulation of large-scale brain networks in schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 74, 467–474. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.02.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Morgan D. G., May P. C., Finch C. E. (1987). Dopamine and serotonin systems in human and rodent brain: effects of age and neurodegenerative disease. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 35, 334–345. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1987.tb04641.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Murty V. P., Shermohammed M., Smith D. V., Carter R. M., Huettel S. A., Adcock R. A. (2014). Resting state networks distinguish human ventral tegmental area from substantia nigra. NeuroImage 100, 580–589. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Nagano-Saito A., Leyton M., Monchi O., Goldberg Y. K., He Y., Dagher A. (2008). Dopamine depletion impairs frontostriatal functional connectivity during a set-shifting task. J. Neurosci. 28, 3697–3706. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3921-07.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Oliva I., Wanat M. J. (2016). Ventral tegmental area afferents and drug-dependent behaviors. Front. Psychiatry 7:30. 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Park B. Y., Park H. (2016). Connectivity differences between adult male and female patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder according to resting-state functional MRI. Neural Regen. Res. 11, 119–125. 10.4103/1673-5374.175056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Power J. D., Barnes K. A., Snyder A. Z., Schlaggar B. L., Petersen S. E. (2012). Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 59, 2142–2154. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Redgrave P., Rodriguez M., Smith Y., Rodriguez-Oroz M. C., Lehericy S., Bergman H., et al. (2010). Goal-directed and habitual control in the basal ganglia: implications for Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 760–772. 10.1038/nrn2915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Reeves S., Bench C., Howard R. (2002). Ageing and the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 17, 359–370. 10.1002/gps.606 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Roberts A. C., Wallis J. D. (2000). Inhibitory control and affective processing in the prefrontal cortex: neuropsychological studies in the common marmoset. Cereb. Cortex 10, 252–262. 10.1093/cercor/10.3.252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Rollo C. D. (2009). Dopamine and aging: intersecting facets. Neurochem. Res. 34, 601–629. 10.1007/s11064-008-9858-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Rombouts S., Stam C. J., Kuijer J. P., Scheltens P., Barkhof F. (2003). Identifying confounds to increase specificity during a “no task condition”: evidence for hippocampal connectivity using fMRI. NeuroImage 20, 1236–1245. 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00386-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Roski C., Caspers S., Langner R., Laird A. R., Fox P. T., Zilles K., et al. (2013). Adult age-dependent differences in resting-state connectivity within and between visual-attention and sensorimotor networks. Front Aging Neurosci 5:67. 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Rueckert L., Grafman J. (1996). Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia 34, 953–963. 10.1016/0028-3932(96)00016-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Rueckert L., Grafman J. (1998). Sustained attention deficits in patients with lesions of posterior cortex. Neuropsychologia 36, 653–660. 10.1016/s0028-3932(97)00150-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Rutledge R. B., Skandali N., Dayan P., Dolan R. J. (2015). Dopaminergic modulation of decision making and subjective well-being. J. Neurosci. 35, 9811–9822. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0702-15.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Schlösser R., Nenadic I., Wagner G., Zysset S., Koch K., Sauer H. (2009). Dopaminergic modulation of brain systems subserving decision making under uncertainty: a study with fMRI and methylphenidate challenge. Synapse 63, 429–442. 10.1002/syn.20621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Schmahmann J. D., Pandya D. N. (1997). Anatomic organization of the basilar pontine projections from prefrontal cortices in rhesus monkey. J. Neurosci. 17, 438–458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Schmitt H., Ferdinand N. K., Kray J. (2015). The influence of monetary incentives on context processing in younger and older adults: an event-related potential study. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 15, 416–434. 10.3758/s13415-015-0335-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Schultz W. (2002). Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron 36, 241–263. 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00967-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Schultz W., Preuschoff K., Camerer C., Hsu M., Fiorillo C. D., Tobler P. N., et al. (2008). Explicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertainty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363, 3801–3811. 10.1098/rstb.2008.0152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Schulz-Schaeffer W. J. (2015). Is cell death primary or secondary in the pathophysiology of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease? Biomolecules 5, 1467–1479. 10.3390/biom5031467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Seidel S., Kasprian G., Leutmezer F., Prayer D., Auff E. (2009). Disruption of nigrostriatal and cerebellothalamic pathways in dopamine responsive Holmes’ tremor. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 921–923. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.146324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Shingai Y., Tateno A., Arakawa R., Sakayori T., Kim W., Suzuki H., et al. (2014). Age-related decline in dopamine transporter in human brain using PET with a new radioligand [(1)(8)F]FE-PE2I. Ann. Nucl. Med. 28, 220–226. 10.1007/s12149-013-0798-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Singh-Curry V., Husain M. (2009). The functional role of the inferior parietal lobe in the dorsal and ventral stream dichotomy. Neuropsychologia 47, 1434–1448. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Smyser C. D., Inder T. E., Shimony J. S., Hill J. E., Degnan A. J., Snyder A. Z., et al. (2010). Longitudinal analysis of neural network development in preterm infants. Cereb. Cortex 20, 2852–2862. 10.1093/cercor/bhq035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Sprengelmeyer R., Young A. W., Mahn K., Schroeder U., Woitalla D., Büttner T., et al. (2003). Facial expression recognition in people with medicated and unmedicated Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia 41, 1047–1057. 10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00295-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Sterzer P., Kleinschmidt A. (2010). Anterior insula activations in perceptual paradigms: often observed but barely understood. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 611–622. 10.1007/s00429-010-0252-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Swick D., Ashley V., Turken A. U. (2008). Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC Neurosci. 9:102. 10.1186/1471-2202-9-102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Tomasi D., Volkow N. D., Wang G. J., Wang R., Telang F., Caparelli E. C., et al. (2011). Methylphenidate enhances brain activation and deactivation responses to visual attention and working memory tasks in healthy controls. NeuroImage 54, 3101–3110. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Tomasi D., Volkow N. D. (2014). Functional connectivity of substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area: maturation during adolescence and effects of ADHD. Cereb. Cortex 24, 935–944. 10.1093/cercor/bhs382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Tomasi D., Volkow N. D., Wang R., Telang F., Wang G. J., Chang L., et al. (2009). Dopamine transporters in striatum correlate with deactivation in the default mode network during visuospatial attention. PLoS One 4:e6102. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Uddin L. Q., Kelly A. M., Biswal B. B., Margulies D. S., Shehzad Z., Shaw D., et al. (2008). Network homogeneity reveals decreased integrity of default-mode network in ADHD. J. Neurosci. Methods 169, 249–254. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.11.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Van Dijk K. R., Sabuncu M. R., Buckner R. L. (2012). The influence of head motion on intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage 59, 431–438. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Volkow N. D., Logan J., Fowler J. S., Wang G. J., Gur R. C., Wong C., et al. (2000). Association between age-related decline in brain dopamine activity and impairment in frontal and cingulate metabolism. Am. J. Psychiatry 157, 75–80. 10.1176/ajp.157.1.75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Volkow N. D., Wang G. J., Kollins S. H., Wigal T. L., Newcorn J. H., Telang F., et al. (2009). Evaluating dopamine reward pathway in ADHD: clinical implications. JAMA 302, 1084–1091. 10.1001/jama.2009.1308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Volkow N. D., Wang G. J., Newcorn J., Telang F., Solanto M. V., Fowler J. S., et al. (2007). Depressed dopamine activity in caudate and preliminary evidence of limbic involvement in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 64, 932–940. 10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Watanabe H. (1987). Differential decrease in the rate of dopamine synthesis in several dopaminergic neurons of aged rat brain. Exp. Gerontol. 22, 17–25. 10.1016/0531-5565(87)90011-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Wise R. A. (2004). Dopamine, learning and motivation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 483–494. 10.1038/nrn1406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wu T., Long X., Zang Y., Wang L., Hallett M., Li K., et al. (2009). Regional homogeneity changes in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 1502–1510. 10.1002/hbm.20622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Xu C., Li C., Wu H., Wu Y., Hu S., Zhu Y., et al. (2015). Gender differences in cerebral regional homogeneity of adult healthy volunteers: a resting-state fMRI study. Biomed Res. Int. 2015:183074. 10.1155/2015/183074 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Zago L., Petit L., Turbelin M., Andersson F., Vigneau M., Tzourio-Mazoyer N. (2008). How verbal and spatial manipulation networks contribute to calculation: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 46, 2403–2414. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Zahm D. S., Trimble M. (2008). The dopaminergic projection system, basal forebrain macrosystems and conditioned stimuli. CNS Spectr. 13, 32–40. 10.1017/s1092852900016138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Zar J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. (Vol. 4) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  132. Zhang C., Cahill N. D., Arbabshirani M. R., White T., Baum S. A., Michael A. M. (2016). Sex and age effects of functional connectivity in early adulthood. Brain Connect. 6, 700–713. 10.1089/brain.2016.0429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Zhang S., Hu S., Chao H. H., Li C. S. (2016). Resting-state functional connectivity of the locus coeruleus in humans: in comparison with the ventral tegmental area/substantia nigra pars compacta and the effects of age. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3413–3427. 10.1093/cercor/bhv172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Zhang S., Hu S., Chao H. H., Li C.-S. R. (2017). Hemispheric lateralization of resting state functional connectivity of the ventral striatum: an exploratory study. Brain Struct. Funct. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1007/s00429-016-1358-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhang S., Ide J. S., Li C. S. (2012). Resting-state functional connectivity of the medial superior frontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex 22, 99–111. 10.1093/cercor/bhr088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhang S., Li C. S. (2014). Functional clustering of the human inferior parietal lobule by whole-brain connectivity mapping of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging signals. Brain Connect. 4, 53–69. 10.1089/brain.2013.0191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Zhou Y., Li S., Dunn J., Li H., Qin W., Zhu M., et al. (2014). The neural correlates of risk propensity in males and females using resting-state fMRI. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 8:2. 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Human Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES