Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10490–10494. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10490

Rapid dissociation and reassociation of actomyosin cross-bridges during force generation: a newly observed facet of cross-bridge action in muscle.

B Brenner 1
PMCID: PMC52954  PMID: 1835789

Abstract

The force response of skinned fibers of the rabbit psoas muscle to stretches (and releases) was studied. At physiological ionic strength and low experimental temperature (5 degrees C) the force response to stretches apparently is affected neither by cross-bridges that occupy weak-binding states nor by transitions among various attached force-generating states. Plots of force vs. imposed length change (T plots) recorded during stretches suggest that cross-bridges even in force-generating states dissociate and reassociate rapidly from and to actin as had previously been proposed [Brenner, B. (1986) Basic Res. Cardiol. 81, 1-15]. Plots of fiber stiffness vs. speed of imposed length changes (stiffness-speed relations) imply rate constants for dissociation (k-) in the force-generating states ranging from 50 to 1000 s-1, while the rate constant for reassociation (k+) has to be at least an order of magnitude larger (high actin affinity). Rapidly reversible actin interaction of cross-bridges in force-generating states provides a mechanism for rapid detachment of force-generating cross-bridges during high-speed shortening which, in contrast with the hypothesis of A. F. Huxley [(1957) Prog. Biophys. 7, 255-318], and related cross-bridge models, does not require completion of the ATP-hydrolysis cycle and thus may account for the unexpectedly low ATPase activity during high-speed shortening.

Full text

PDF
10490

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brenner B., Chalovich J. M., Greene L. E., Eisenberg E., Schoenberg M. Stiffness of skinned rabbit psoas fibers in MgATP and MgPPi solution. Biophys J. 1986 Oct;50(4):685–691. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(86)83509-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brenner B., Eisenberg E. Rate of force generation in muscle: correlation with actomyosin ATPase activity in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May;83(10):3542–3546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.10.3542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brenner B. Mechanical and structural approaches to correlation of cross-bridge action in muscle with actomyosin ATPase in solution. Annu Rev Physiol. 1987;49:655–672. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.49.030187.003255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner B., Schoenberg M., Chalovich J. M., Greene L. E., Eisenberg E. Evidence for cross-bridge attachment in relaxed muscle at low ionic strength. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982 Dec;79(23):7288–7291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.79.23.7288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner B. The cross-bridge cycle in muscle. Mechanical, biochemical, and structural studies on single skinned rabbit psoas fibers to characterize cross-bridge kinetics in muscle for correlation with the actomyosin-ATPase in solution. Basic Res Cardiol. 1986;81 (Suppl 1):1–15. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-11374-5_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cooke R., Bialek W. Contraction of glycerinated muscle fibers as a function of the ATP concentration. Biophys J. 1979 Nov;28(2):241–258. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(79)85174-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L., Chen Y. Cross-bridge model of muscle contraction. Quantitative analysis. Biophys J. 1980 Feb;29(2):195–227. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(80)85126-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eisenberg E., Hill T. L. Muscle contraction and free energy transduction in biological systems. Science. 1985 Mar 1;227(4690):999–1006. doi: 10.1126/science.3156404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ford L. E., Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Tension transients during steady shortening of frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1985 Apr;361:131–150. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1985.sp015637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Geeves M. A., Goody R. S., Gutfreund H. Kinetics of acto-S1 interaction as a guide to a model for the crossbridge cycle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1984 Aug;5(4):351–361. doi: 10.1007/BF00818255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Güth K., Kuhn H. J. Stiffness and tension during and after sudden length changes of glycerinated rabbit psoas muscle fibres. Biophys Struct Mech. 1978 Jul 12;4(3):223–236. doi: 10.1007/BF02426087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. HUXLEY A. F. Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog Biophys Biophys Chem. 1957;7:255–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hibberd M. G., Trentham D. R. Relationships between chemical and mechanical events during muscular contraction. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem. 1986;15:119–161. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.15.060186.001003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hill T. L. Theoretical formalism for the sliding filament model of contraction of striated muscle. Part I. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1974;28:267–340. doi: 10.1016/0079-6107(74)90020-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huxley A. F., Simmons R. M. Proposed mechanism of force generation in striated muscle. Nature. 1971 Oct 22;233(5321):533–538. doi: 10.1038/233533a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huxley H. E. The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science. 1969 Jun 20;164(3886):1356–1365. doi: 10.1126/science.164.3886.1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Julian F. J., Sollins M. R. Variation of muscle stiffness with force at increasing speeds of shortening. J Gen Physiol. 1975 Sep;66(3):287–302. doi: 10.1085/jgp.66.3.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kawai M. Head rotation or dissociation? A study of exponential rate processes in chemically skinned rabbit muscle fibers when MgATP concentration is changed. Biophys J. 1978 Apr;22(1):97–103. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(78)85473-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuhn H. J., Güth K., Drexler B., Berberich W., Rüegg J. C. Investigation of the temperature dependence of the cross bridge parameters for attachment, force generation and detachment as deduced from mechano-chemical studies in glycerinated single fibres from the dorsal longitudinal muscle of Lethocerus maximus. Biophys Struct Mech. 1979 Dec;6(1):1–29. doi: 10.1007/BF00537592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kushmerick M. J., Davies R. E. The chemical energetics of muscle contraction. II. The chemistry, efficiency and power of maximally working sartorius muscles. Appendix. Free energy and enthalpy of atp hydrolysis in the sarcoplasm. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Dec 23;174(1036):315–353. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1969.0096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lombardi V., Piazzesi G. The contractile response during steady lengthening of stimulated frog muscle fibres. J Physiol. 1990 Dec;431:141–171. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lymn R. W., Taylor E. W. Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry. 1971 Dec 7;10(25):4617–4624. doi: 10.1021/bi00801a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Marston S. B., Taylor E. W. Comparison of the myosin and actomyosin ATPase mechanisms of the four types of vertebrate muscles. J Mol Biol. 1980 Jun 5;139(4):573–600. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(80)90050-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rosenfeld S. S., Taylor E. W. The ATPase mechanism of skeletal and smooth muscle acto-subfragment 1. J Biol Chem. 1984 Oct 10;259(19):11908–11919. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rüdel R., Zite-Ferenczy F. Interpretation of light diffraction by cross-striated muscle as Bragg reflexion of light by the lattice of contractile proteins. J Physiol. 1979 May;290(2):317–330. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Schoenberg M., Eisenberg E. Muscle cross-bridge kinetics in rigor and in the presence of ATP analogues. Biophys J. 1985 Dec;48(6):863–871. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83847-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schoenberg M. Equilibrium muscle cross-bridge behavior. Theoretical considerations. Biophys J. 1985 Sep;48(3):467–475. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(85)83802-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Taylor E. W. Kinetic studies on the association and dissociation of myosin subfragment 1 and actin. J Biol Chem. 1991 Jan 5;266(1):294–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Toyoshima Y. Y., Kron S. J., Spudich J. A. The myosin step size: measurement of the unit displacement per ATP hydrolyzed in an in vitro assay. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Sep;87(18):7130–7134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.18.7130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Yanagida T., Arata T., Oosawa F. Sliding distance of actin filament induced by a myosin crossbridge during one ATP hydrolysis cycle. Nature. 1985 Jul 25;316(6026):366–369. doi: 10.1038/316366a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Yu L. C., Brenner B. Structures of actomyosin crossbridges in relaxed and rigor muscle fibers. Biophys J. 1989 Mar;55(3):441–453. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(89)82838-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES