Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 15;35(7):1055–1063. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.070

Table 3.

Incremental outcomes of PCV13 compared to no vaccination over thirty years.

Direct and indirect population effects (base case)a
Direct population effects onlyb
No vaccination with PCV Vaccination with PCV13 Difference: Vaccination with PCV13 vs. no PCV vaccination Vaccination with PCV13 Difference: Vaccination with PCV13 vs. no PCV vaccination
Number of children vaccinated with 3 doses 0 1.9 mil 1.9 mil 1.9 mil 1.9 mil
Total vaccination cost (undiscounted) $0 $19 mil $19 mil $19 mil $19 mil
Freight, administration cost (undiscounted) $0 $5.6 mil $5.6 mil $5.6 mil $5.6 mil
Health care costs (undiscounted) $51.7 mil $36.6 mil −$15.1 mil $40.0 mil −$11.8 mil
Societal costs (undiscounted) $54.6 mil $40.5 mil −$14.2 mil $44.3 mil −$10.4 mil
IPD cases 17,700 10,800 −6,890 10,040 −7,700
Non-IPD pneumonia cases 217,000 132,000 −85,200 158,000 −58,900
Acute otitis media cases 4,360,000 3,940,000 −417,000 3,940,000 −417,000
Deaths 15,200 9,240 −5,950 10,300 −4,900
DALYs lost (undiscounted) 548,000 364,000 −184,000 378,000 −170,000
DALYs lost (discounted) 358,000 237,000 −121,000 250,000 −108,000
Total costs with productivity (undiscounted) $106 mil $102 mil −$4.72 mil $109 mil $2.44 mil
Total costs with productivity (discounted) $ 69.5 mil $66.5 mil −$2.96 mil $71.5 mil $2.02 mil
Total costs without productivity (undiscounted) $51.7 mil $61.2 mil $9.46 mil $64.5 mil $12.8 mil
Total costs without productivity (discounted) $33.8 mil $40.0 mil $6.25 mil $42.4 mil $8.62 mil
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (with productivity) Cost saving $19
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (without productivity) $52 $79

Mil: million; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: Cost per DALY averted; IPD: Invasive pneumococcal disease.

In this analysis, following World Health Organization recommendations [14], future costs and health outcomes were both discounted to their present values (in the year 2014) at a rate of 3% per annum. Discounting allows for comparison of costs and benefits across different time periods, by weighting future gains and losses less heavily than those in the present to account for time value.

Both health system (excluding productivity losses) and societal (considering productivity losses and out-of-pocket expenses) perspectives are shown.

Figures are reported to two or three significant figures for visual clarity. Some apparent discrepancies may result due to this rounding.

a

Base case model assuming serotype replacement and herd protection (both direct and indirect effects of vaccine).

b

An alternate conservative model considering direct effects of vaccine alone (no serotype replacement and no herd protection).