Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2017 Jan 13;10(1):38–55. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.38-55

Transcriptomic comparison of primary bovine horn core carcinoma culture and parental tissue at early stage

Sharadindu Shil 1,2, R S Joshi 2, C G Joshi 3, A K Patel 4, Ravi K Shah 3, Namrata Patel 3, Subhash J Jakhesara 3, Sumana Kundu 5, Bhaskar Reddy 3, P G Koringa 3, D N Rank 3,2,
PMCID: PMC5301178  PMID: 28246447

Abstract

Aim:

Squamous cell carcinoma or SCC of horn in bovines (bovine horn core carcinoma) frequently observed in Bos indicus affecting almost 1% of cattle population. Freshly isolated primary epithelial cells may be closely related to the malignant epithelial cells of the tumor. Comparison of gene expression in between horn’s SCC tissue and its early passage primary culture using next generation sequencing was the aim of this study.

Materials and Methods:

Whole transcriptome sequencing of horn’s SCC tissue and its early passage cells using Ion Torrent PGM were done. Comparative expression and analysis of different genes and pathways related to cancer and biological processes associated with malignancy, proliferating capacity, differentiation, apoptosis, senescence, adhesion, cohesion, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and metabolic pathways were identified.

Results:

Up-regulated genes in SCC of horn’s early passage cells were involved in transporter activity, catalytic activity, nucleic acid binding transcription factor activity, biogenesis, cellular processes, biological regulation and localization and the down-regulated genes mainly were involved in focal adhesion, extracellular matrix receptor interaction and spliceosome activity.

Conclusion:

The experiment revealed similar transcriptomic nature of horn’s SCC tissue and its early passage cells.

Keywords: cummerbund, gene ontology, primary culture, RNA-sequencing, squamous cell carcinoma of horn, transcriptome profiling

Introduction

Cancer cell lines, in general, are used as a model in testing of anticancer drugs presently used [1,2] as well as in the development of new therapies [3,4]. There is no bovine cell line of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) origin. This is probably the first ever attempt to develop a SCC cell line of bovine origin. The horn cancer-based cell line can be used as an in vitro model in cancer research to define potential molecular markers as well as for the screening and characterization of cancer therapeutics similar to human lung and breast cancer cell lines [5,6]. The results of the research in cancer cell lines can usually be extrapolated to in vivo tumors originated from squamous cells. Transcriptomic profiling of the initial passage cells and the SCC tissue was attempted in this study to confirm the initial passage cells represent the SCC tissue at molecular level.

Historically, in vitro cultures of SCC of horn (bovine horn core carcinoma [BHCC]) have been limited in availability and scope, compared to those from many other organs such as mammary tumors and endometrial cancer cell lines. Cell lines, those derived from metastases, do not span the range of most of cancer phenotypes, and in particular, are not representative of original SCC [7]. Furthermore, how extensively long-term culture alters the biological properties of cell lines are always of concern [8]. Adaptation of fresh cancerous tissue specimens which grow in vitro as primary cell cultures provides homogeneous cellular material, enriched in tumor cell component [7] and it also retains phenotypic, transcriptomics profile of the corresponding tissues from which they derive [8-10] at the first passages.

Usually, up regulations of genes are involved in proliferation and metabolism. Cellular activity within a tissue is evinced by the transcriptome at a specific time. Pathophysiology of complex diseases, like cancer, can be evaluated by an unbiased method like genome-wide expression studies [10]. RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis is an affordable accurate and comprehensive tool to analyze transcriptome of complementary DNAs (cDNA) using next generation sequencing (NGS), followed by mapping of reads onto the reference genome making it possible to identify introns, exons, their flanking regions and thus providing an opportunity to understand the complexity of eukaryotic transcriptome [11].

SCC of horn of bovines is a SCC of horn core mucosa with least known genetic landscape, reported only in Bos indicus. This causes heavy economic losses due to subsequent metastasis and death of animal. In India, approximately 1% of the cattle population is affected by this tumor [12], most commonly in working bullocks, sometimes in cows and rarely in bulls, buffaloes, sheep, and goats [13-16]. The incidence of SCC of horns is more frequent in Kankrej breed than other zebu cattle, crossbred or non-descript cattle [17]. From Sumatra [18], Brazil [19], and Iraq [20] few cases were reported. Till date, the comparison of gene expression profile between cell culture and parental tissue of SCC of horn of bovines has not been performed. The study was designed to compare gene expression profiles in SCC affected horn tissue and primary cell culture derived from that tumor using Ion Torrent PGM sequencing platform.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Aprroval for research work granted vide approval no. IAEC: 155/2011 of College of Veterinary Science and animal Husbandry, Anand Agricultural Universuty, Anand-388 001, Gujarat.

Tissue collection

Carcinomatous and normal horn core mucosa were collected during corrective surgery in RNAlater® (Thermo Fisher scientific, Massachusetts, USA) from clinically affected (left horn) and normal (right horn) horn of a Kankrej breed of bullock (age 7 years) from Rajkot, Gujarat, India. Necrotic tissues were not collected. Fresh tissues were cut into pea-sized segments and preserved in:

  1. 10% neutral buffered formalin for histopathological studies

  2. RNAlater® (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) for RNA extraction

  3. Dulbecco’s modification of Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (50 ml) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) with penicillin-streptomycin (500 µl) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) + amphotericin-B (500 µl) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) and brought to lab at 0-4°C.

Histopathology

Horn SCC tissues were processed for histopathological studies and paraffin-embedded sections were cut at 5-6 µ thickness with section cutting machine (Leica, Germany) and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H and E) [21]. The H and E stained sections were observed under light microscope and lesions were observed [21].

Cell culture

After removal of adipose tissue, tumor tissues (at 4°C) were mechanically minced in 1 mm3 fragments. Then, the primary culture was established and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 [21]. Similarly, tumor tissue explant culture was also performed by standard protocol [16]. DMEM and Ham’s F12 50/50 mix (DMEM-F12) medium was changed twice weekly and split ratio for cells were 1:3 when cells reached up to 90% confluence. Cell morphology was observed in contrast phase, at 40× magnification, by inverted microscope. The cells were sampled at intervals, resuspended in a freezing medium (80% DMEM, 10% fetal bovine serum, and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide), and stored at −80°C at every two passages for cryopreservation.

Differential trypsinization was used for removal of the fibroblasts which detached sooner than the tumor cells. Isolation of pure population of tumor cells was done by plating approximately 10,000 detached cells in 100 mm Petri dishes and following dilution cloning [22]. These isolated clones were used for RNA-Seq purposes.

Cell proliferation and doubling time assay

Two counts were performed for each passage, in triplicate. For doubling time analysis, plating of cells in triplicate onto 6-well plates at a concentration of 2.5 × 104 cells/well in DMEM-F12 were done. After 24, 48 and 72 h, cells were collected after trypsinization and counted in a Neubauer chamber. Doubling time (in hour) was calculated as described in a previous study [23].

RNA isolation

TRIzol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) method as per manufacturer’s instructions was used to isolate RNA from early passage cells of SCC of horns (pooled RNA of passage 2 and 3) and parental SCC tissue.

Preparation of sample and transcriptome procedure

All the protocols starting from mRNA isolation to library preparation were followed as per manufacturer’s instructions. The detailed protocol steps can be accessed from Ion Torrent’s “Ion Total RNA-Seq Kit” (Part No.: 4467098) using 316 chip.

In silico gene expression analysis

Sequence reads were generated from cDNA libraries of early passage cells and parental SCC horn tissue using Ion Torrent PGM chemistry using 316 chips [24]. Raw sequence reads (*.fastq files) were checked for quality control in FastQC v0.10.1. To avoid low quality data negatively influencing downstream analysis, the reads were trimmed and low quality sequences were filtered using PRINSEQ-lite version 0.20.2 with default parameters in Linux. This quality checked reads were aligned to the bosTau7.fa build of the cow genome (http://hgdownloadtest.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/bosTau7/chromosomes/) using GMAP [25] and Samtools allowing for unique non-gapped alignments to the genome. The default parameters for the GMAP method were used.

The resultant *.sam files were converted to *.bam files with Samtools then *.sorted.bam files were used in Cufflinks v 2.2.1. The resulting Cufflinks assemblies of all samples were combined together using Cuffcompare v 2.2.1. The differential expression was calculated by Cuffdiff based on transcript abundances [26]. Cuffdiff v 2.2.1 was then employed on the combined transcripts to identify differentially expressed genes/transcripts.

RNA-Seq data normalization

The raw RNA-Seq read counts for cufflinks transcripts were first log2 transformed at fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads mapped (FPKM) and then quantile normalized.

Functional annotation

The genes differentially expressed in SCC horn tissue and the short-term primary culture was selected for functional categorization. The comparisons between expressed genes which produced Cuffdiff output with “Q value” <0.01 and “OK” marked test status were considered to be differentially expressed. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses of up and down-regulated genes by DAVID database [27] and PANTHER database [28] were done, respectively. Gene set analyses were done in terms of biological processes, molecular function, and cellular component. The list of differentially expressed genes having >5 FPKM value and log2 fold change value above 2 (based on FPKM ratio), p=0.05 and false discovery rate (FDR) value 5% were chosen.

Whole transcriptome analysis using NGS will identify several thousands of genes which are deregulated in number of cancer-related pathways. Since the depth of sequencing for each gene varies because of inherent methodology involved in NGS, it is globally accepted protocol to validate data obtained by this methodology via randomly selecting few of the genes through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [29,30]. Since it is practically impossible to validate all of the genes found in NGS-based study as well as it is economically non-feasible approach to study all identified genes, we have followed standard procedure to validate NGS data by selecting randomly selected sufficiently large set of transcripts and proved concordance of expression pattern using quantitative real-time PCR (Data not shown).

Results

Histopathology of SCC tissue

The tumor cells were tightly cohesive, featured with moderately high to abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. The nucleus to cytoplasmic ratio was potentially increased with nuclei showing frequent prominent nucleoli. Mitotic activity was abundant including atypical forms such as ring and tripolar configurations. Intercellular bridges were focally present. Keratinization of individual epithelial cells (Figure-1a) and pleomorphic epithelial cells with enlarged nuclei (Figure-1b) were seen. Histopathology confirmed SCC of the horn core epithelium.

Figure-1.

Figure-1

(a) Keratinization of individual horn squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) epithelial cells of parental tissue as seen in H and E stain at 100×, (b) pleomorphic horn SCC cells with nucleolar polymorphism of parental tissue as seen in H and E stain at 100×.

Isolation of SCC horn epithelial cells

Primary monolayer culture with finite mitotic lifespan (SCC early passage cells) was established from the bullock affected with SCC of horn (Figure-2) following the enzymatic disaggregation methods as described earlier [22]. By the first week, tumor cells were seen rounding up and growing throughout the T-25/T-75 flask (Figure-3) among the normal stromal fibroblasts that grew in parallel.

Figure-2.

Figure-2

Primary monolayer culture of horn squamous cell carcinoma cells at 40×.

Figure-3.

Figure-3

Rounded up horn squamous cell carcinoma malignant early passage cells on day 7 at 40×.

Growth curve and population doubling time analysis

Population doubling time ascertained around 28.1 h (Figure-4), and cell viability ranged from 85% to 94%. The culture success rate was 90%.

Figure-4.

Figure-4

Growth curves of horn squamous cell carcinoma (bovine horn core carcinoma) early passage cells.

Transcriptomic comparison between SCC horn tissue and its early passage cells

The total number of genes differentially overexpressed in SCC horn tissue were 717 (8.40% of total genes expressed) compared to early passage cells; 150 genes (1.76% of total genes expressed) were differentially up-regulated which had more than 2-fold Log2 value with maximum value of 6.03-fold change. There were 746 genes (8.74% of total genes expressed) which had differential over-expression in early passage cells than SCC horn tissue, 248 genes (2.90% of total genes expressed) had more than 2-fold log2 value with maximum Log2 value 7.02. In this comparison, 5219 genes (~38% of total genes no., i.e., 14513 no.) showed no expression at the terms of FPKM in both the samples 1600 genes had more than 5 FPKM value in early passage cells.

Genes overexpressed in SCC early passage cells and SCC horn tissue

Density plot and dispersion plot were derived for this comparison, respectively. Density plot assessed the distributions of FPKM scores across samples. Among the differentially expressed genes maximum genes had FPKM value between Log10 1 and Log10 2. Distribution of genes in SCC horn tissue ranged from Log10 0.2 to Log10 3.7 and for early passage SCC cells, it was Log10 0.7 to Log10 3.7. Dispersion plot showed normal dispersion of genes across samples. N-Myc downstream regulated 1, integrin alpha 6, TP53 apoptosis effector (PERP), eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 A1 (A1EIF4A1), desmoplakin, etc., genes were up-regulated (up-to 2-fold FPKM value) in SCC horn tissue compared to SCC early passage cells. Up-regulated genes (up to 2-fold FPKM value) in horn SCC early passage cells compared to parental tissue were coiled-coil domain containing 69 (CCDC69), CCDC94, Sec61 gamma subunit (SEC61G), Paladin, Hedgehog (Hh) receptor patched homolog 1 (PTCH1), Armadillo repeat containing X-linked 2 and thioredoxin, etc.

GO category of the genes differentially expressed above 2 log2 fold change in SCC early passage cells compared to SCC horn tissue to be of calcium channel activity, calcium ion binding, protein phosphatase Type 2A activity and extracellular matrix (ECM) binding as per DAVID database (Table-1). The genes which were up-regulated in SCC horn tissue compared to its early passage cells showed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I protein binding, MHC protein binding, procollagen proline 4-dioxygenase activity, peptidyl-proline dioxygenase activity, procollagen-proline dioxygenase activity, and protein disulfide isomerase activity.

Table-1.

KEGG pathway of genes up in SCC early passage cells significantly over SCC horn tissue.

KEGG pathway p value Genes Fold change Fold enrichment FDR
bta04350:TGF-beta signaling pathway 0.031289 MAPK1 +2.01994 4.113924 29.86879
ROCK2 +2.16513
TGFBR1 +2.03972
PPP2CB +2.30283
THBS1 +3.95799
bta03010:Ribosome 0.037987 RPL32 +2.62569 3.869048 35.09439
RPL23 +3.21069
RPS17 +3.94767
RPL3 +3.20979
RPL24 +2.62553
bta05416:Viral myocarditis 0.06468 SGCG +3.62476 4.262295 52.58867
CASP9 +2.03964
MYH11 +3.03959
ITGB2 +3.03967
bta05212:Pancreatic cancer 0.080806 VEGFC +2.20969 3.880597 60.95311
MAPK1 +2.01994
CASP9 +2.03964
TGFBR1 +2.03972
bta04114:Oocyte meiosis 0.082876 CCNE2 +2.81728 2.981651 61.92363
MAPK1 +2.01994
PPP2CB +2.30283
PPP2R5E +2.13926
ITPR2 +2.03959
bta05200:Pathways in cancer 0.086841 CCNE2 +2.81728 1.930693 63.72096
VEGFC +2.20
MAPK1 +2.01994
PIAS4 +5.08415
CASP9 +2.03964
TGFBR1 +2.03972
MET +2.03961
FGF10 +3.62461
PTCH1 +6.20952
bta05010:Alzheimer’s disease 0.089018 MAPK1 +2.01994 2.484076 64.67474
NDUFS5 +5.6258
NDUFB6 +3.62546
CASP9 +2.03964
COX5A +2.04022
ITPR2 +2.03959
bta04360:Axon guidance 0.094055 MAPK1 +2.01994 2.850877 66.79443
ROCK2 +2.16513
MET +2.03961
NTN4 +5.94653
SEMA3C +2.62465

KEGG=Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, TGF=Transforming growth factor, FDR=False discovery rate, CASP9=Caspase 9, PPP2R5E=Protein phosphatase 2 regulatory subunit B epsilon

The percentage of genes which showed up-regulation in SCC horn tissue than SCC early passage cells was 1.76%. Genes up-regulated (≥2-fold) in SCC horn tissue as compared to horn SCC early passage cells were involved in biogenesis, apoptotic response and response to stimulus in biological processes; structural molecular activity and translation regulator activity in molecular function; cell part, organelle and macromolecular complex in cellular component and the up-regulated genes (≥2-fold) in horn SCC early passage cells were involved in cellular process, metabolic process, biological regulation in biological processes; catalytic activity, enzyme regulator activity, binding in molecular function; membrane, extracellular region in cellular component as per PANTHER database.

There was no pathway in 5 FDR limit, but the lowest FDR value was found at transforming growth factor (TGF) beta signaling pathway and ribosomal pathway for differentially up-regulated genes in SCC early passage cells compared to SCC horn tissue in Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways (Table-2). Surprisingly, most of the genes which showed top fold change (within first 20) were not detected by DAVID during pathway analysis. Focal adhesion, ECM-receptor interaction, thyroid cancer, and pathways in cancer were shown by the genes which were up-regulated in SCC horn tissue than SCC early passage cells (Table-3).

Table-2.

KEGG pathway analysis of significantly up regulated genes in SCC horn tissue in comparison to SCC early passage cells.

KEGG pathway p value Genes Fold change Fold enrichment FDR
bta04510:Focal adhesion 0.003554 CDC42 −3.18266 3.489795918 3.85308
ITGA6 −5.25806
ILK −2.2332
COL6A2 −3.64219
PDGFRA −2.10337
COL1A1 −2.81067
PPP1CB −4.46812
THBS2 −2.81836
CTNNB1 −2.95534
bta04512:ECM-receptor interaction 0.020151 CD44 −2.84292 4.704761905 20.12056515
ITGA6 −5.25806
COL6A2 −3.64219
COL1A1 −2.81067
THBS2 −2.81836
bta05216:Thyroid cancer 0.050381 NCOA4 −2.01925 8.142857143 43.47494112
MYC −3.83476
CTNNB1 −2.95534
bta05200:Pathways in cancer 0.058738 HSP90AB1 −2.36404 2.096181047 48.72805735
CDC42 −3.18266
HSP90AA1 −2.39775
ITGA6 −5.25806
NCOA4 −2.01925
PDGFRA −2.10337
MYC −3.83476
STAT3 −3.82663
CTNNB1 2.95534
bta05412:ARVC 0.06167 ITGA6 −5.25806 4.342857143 50.4635378
DSP −4.84482
GJA1 −3.61259
CTNNB1 −2.95534
bta04612:Antigen processing and presentation 0.066334 HSP90AB1 −2.36404 4.213219616 53.11403035
HSP90AA1 −2.39775
PDIA3 −2.03351
HSPA8 −2.40875
bta03040:Spliceosome 0.089962 PRPF8 −4.3062 2.892271663 64.66578307
SNRNP200 −3.32965
DDX5 −2.27017
HSPA8 −2.40875
HNRNPU −3.78478

KEGG=Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, ARVC=Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, FDR=False discovery rate, ITGA6=Integrin alpha 6, ECM=Extracellular matrix

Table-3.

GO of genes up regulated (≥2-fold) in SCC early passage cells compared to SCC horn tissue via DAVID.

Term Count FDR % p value
GO:0046872~metal ion binding 47 5.388398 21.17117 0.004134
GO:0043169~cation binding 47 6.774957 21.17117 0.005233
GO:0043167~ion binding 47 8.187385 21.17117 0.006369
GO:0019992~diacylglycerol binding 3 25.30314 1.351351 0.021584
GO:0050840~ECM binding 3 25.30314 1.351351 0.021584
GO:0000287~magnesium ion binding 7 34.49892 3.153153 0.031151
GO:0019838~growth factor binding 4 34.68459 1.801802 0.031356
GO:0015405~P-P-bond-hydrolysis driven transmembrane transporter activity 5 47.96599 2.252252 0.047687
GO:0015399~primary active transmembrane transporter activity 5 47.96599 2.252252 0.047687
GO:0008289~lipid binding 7 60.62826 3.153153 0.067344
GO:0005262~calcium channel activity 3 74.51316 1.351351 0.097192
GO:0005543~phospholipid binding 4 75.25716 1.801802 0.099191

Count denotes gene count. GO=Gene ontology, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, FDR=False discovery rate, ECM=Extracellular matrix

Genes up-regulated in SCC early passage cells compared to SCC horn tissue were involved in fibroblast growth factor signaling pathway, wnt signaling pathway, vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathway, apoptosis signaling pathway and p53 signaling, epidermal growth factor receptor, cell cycle, inflammatory pathways mediated by chemokine and cytokine, etc., as per PANTHER database.

KEGG pathway of all genes, expressed in SCC early passage cells showed to be involved in focal adhesion, transforming growth factor TGF-beta signaling pathway, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, pathways in cancer, prostate cancer mechanism within 5 FDR value (Table-4). KEGG pathways such as thyroid cancer, focal adhesion, small cell lung cancer, pathways in cancer, prostate cancer and spliceosome were shown to be involved when all the common genes (≥5 FPKM) between SCC horn tissue and SCC early passage cells compared in DAVID (Table-5). To unveil the genes involved in horn cancer pathogenesis, both in-vivo and in-vitro genes were mined from common pathways up to 5 FDR (Table-6).

Table-4.

KEGG pathway of all genes expressing ≥5 FPKM in SCC early passage cells.

Term Count FDR % p value
bta04510:Focal adhesion 48 4.06E-06 3.292181 3.33E-09
bta04810:Regulation of actin cytoskeleton 40 0.042391 2.743484 3.47E-05
bta04350:TGF-beta signaling pathway 22 0.0641 1.508916 5.25E-05
bta04512:ECM-receptor interaction 21 0.091836 1.440329 7.52E-05
bta04520:Adherens junction 18 0.596801 1.234568 4.90E-04
bta04120:Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis 28 0.923001 1.920439 7.59E-04
bta05010:Alzheimer’s disease 30 2.493014 2.057613 0.002065
bta03010:Ribosome 19 3.336116 1.303155 0.002775
bta05200:Pathways in cancer 49 3.410855 3.360768 0.002838
bta05215:Prostate cancer 18 7.802359 1.234568 0.00663
bta05016:Huntington’s disease 30 7.998577 2.057613 0.006803
bta04670:Leukocyte transendothelial migration 22 8.071079 1.508916 0.006867
bta04114:Oocyte meiosis 21 12.05085 1.440329 0.01046
bta00640:Propanoate metabolism 9 15.5853 0.617284 0.013778
bta03050:Proteasome 11 17.36369 0.754458 0.015496
bta04270:Vascular smooth muscle contraction 20 17.64442 1.371742 0.015771
bta04530:Tight junction 22 19.73693 1.508916 0.017843
bta03040:Spliceosome 22 19.73693 1.508916 0.017843
bta05412:ARVC 14 20.06711 0.960219 0.018174
bta05211:Renal cell carcinoma 14 20.06711 0.960219 0.018174
bta04540:Gap junction 16 20.36185 1.097394 0.018471
bta05212:Pancreatic cancer 14 24.78525 0.960219 0.023053
bta05012:Parkinson’s disease 22 28.40347 1.508916 0.02699
bta05210:Colorectal cancer 16 31.81445 1.097394 0.030871
bta05414:Dilated cardiomyopathy 15 32.4247 1.028807 0.031584
bta04360:Axon guidance 20 32.69897 1.371742 0.031907
bta04110:Cell cycle 21 35.81972 1.440329 0.035663
bta05410:HCM 14 38.80693 0.960219 0.03942
bta04150:mTOR signaling pathway 11 39.72862 0.754458 0.040613
bta05222:Small cell lung cancer 15 40.92982 1.028807 0.042193
bta04720:Long-term potentiation 12 43.26753 0.823045 0.045355
bta04142:Lysosome 19 48.66196 1.303155 0.053134
bta05213:Endometrial cancer 10 55.76984 0.685871 0.064618
bta04666:Fc gamma R-mediated phagocytosis 15 59.04418 1.028807 0.070491
bta00520:Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism 9 60.46497 0.617284 0.073175
bta05220:Chronic myeloid leukemia 13 69.07887 0.891632 0.091639
bta00190:Oxidative phosphorylation 20 70.92517 1.371742 0.096207

Count denotes gene count. ARVC=Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, KEGG=Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, HCM=Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million, FDR=False discovery rate, ECM=Extracellular matrix

Table-5.

KEGG pathway of all common genes (≥5 FPKM) in between SCC horn tissue and SCC early passage cells.

Term Count FDR % p value
bta04510:Focal adhesion 32 2.52E-06 4.878049 2.12E-09
bta04810:Regulation of actin cytoskeleton 26 0.014261 3.963415 1.20E-05
bta04512:ECM-receptor interaction 15 0.027243 2.286585 2.30E-05
bta05200:Pathways in cancer 31 0.450733 4.72561 3.81E-04
bta05215:Prostate cancer 13 1.366688 1.981707 0.00115989
bta05412:ARVC 11 1.968263 1.676829 0.00167511
bta04670:Leukocyte transendothelial migration 15 2.062266 2.286585 0.001755881
bta04520:Adherens junction 11 2.482973 1.676829 0.002118237
bta04120:Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis 15 10.18146 2.286585 0.009015052
bta04530:Tight junction 14 11.1892 2.134146 0.009957604
bta03040:Spliceosome 14 11.1892 2.134146 0.009957604
bta04350:TGF-beta signaling pathway 10 21.36772 1.52439 0.020069312
bta05213:Endometrial cancer 7 35.30036 1.067073 0.036055226
bta05216:Thyroid cancer 5 40.50522 0.762195 0.04284919
bta05414:Dilated cardiomyopathy 9 41.73228 1.371951 0.044529994
bta00310:Lysine degradation 6 44.89775 0.914634 0.049020477
bta05211:Renal cell carcinoma 8 45.27855 1.219512 0.049576494
bta04540:Gap junction 9 45.96247 1.371951 0.050584067
bta04110:Cell cycle 12 47.42947 1.829268 0.052785299
bta05222:Small cell lung cancer 9 48.09441 1.371951 0.053801616
bta05010:Alzheimer’s disease 14 53.2995 2.134146 0.062196631
bta05210:Colorectal cancer 9 56.59508 1.371951 0.067966842
bta03010:Ribosome 9 56.59508 1.371951 0.067966842
bta05410:HCM 8 61.65301 1.219512 0.077654962
bta04720:Long-term potentiation 7 64.27834 1.067073 0.083155068
bta04722:Neurotrophin signaling pathway 11 64.64354 1.676829 0.0839493

Count denotes gene count. HCM=Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, FDR=False discovery rate, KEGG=Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, TGF=Transforming growth factor, ARVC=Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Table-6.

Genes common in pathways up to 5 FDR between SCC horn tissue and SCC early passage cells.

KEGG pathway term FDR Genes
bta04510:Focal adhesion 2.5165*E06 TLN1, COL3A1, ITGB1, CTNNB1, MYL9, VCL, ACTG1, CDC42, ITGAV, ILK, COL6A2, COL6A1, THBS2, PIK3R2, FN1, ACTB, COL4A1, ACTN4, PPP1CB, FLNB, FLNA, LAMA4, PPP1CA, CCND1, ITGA6, ITGA5, JUN, COL1A2, PDGFRA, RAP1A, PDGFRB, COL1A1, CRK
bta04810:Regulation of actin cytoskeleton 0.0142 RDX, PIP5K1A, ITGB1, MYL9, VCL, ACTG1, CDC42, EZR, GSN, ITGAV, MSN, FGF2, FN1, APC, PIK3R2, ACTB, ACTN4, PPP1CB, ARPC1A, PPP1CA, ITGA6, ITGA5, CFL1, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, CRK, PIP4K2C
bta04512:ECM-receptor interaction 0.0272 COL4A1, COL3A1, ITGB1, SDC1, LAMA4, ITGA6, CD44, ITGA5, ITGAV, COL6A2, COL1A2, COL6A1, COL1A1, THBS2, FN1
bta05200:Pathways in cancer 0.4507 HSP90AB1, TFG, MMP2, ITGB1, CTNNB1, CDC42, ITGAV, MYC, FGF2, FN1, APC, PIK3R2, COL4A1, HSP90AA1, EPAS1, CREBBP, SMAD4, CTNNA1, STAT3, LAMA4, HSP90B1, CCND1, CDKN1A, HIF1A, ITGA6, NCOA4, JUN, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, JAK1, CRK
bta05215:Prostate cancer 1.3666 HSP90AB1, HSP90AA1, CREBBP, CTNNB1, CCND1, HSP90B1, CDKN1A, ATF4, PDGFRA, CREB3L2, CREB3L1, PDGFRB, PIK3R2
bta05412:ARVC 1.9682 ACTB, ACTG1, ACTN4, ITGA6, ITGA5, ITGAV, LMNA, DSP, GJA1, CTNNA1, ITGB1, CTNNB1
bta04670:Leukocyte transendothelial migration 2.0622 ACTB, ACTN4, GNAI2, GNAI1, CTNNA1, MMP2, ITGB1, VCL, MYL9, CTNNB1, ACTG1, CDC42, EZR, RAP1A, MSN, PIK3R2
bta04520:Adherens junction 2.4829 ACTB, ACTG1, CDC42, PVRL1, ACTN4, PTPRF, CREBBP, SMAD4, CTNNA1, SNAI2, VCL, CTNNB1

ARVC=Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, FDR=False discovery rate, KEGG=Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, ECM=Extracellular matrix

Genes that were uniquely expressed in SCC early passage cells as compared to SCC horn tissue showed involvement in metabolic and cellular process in biological processes; binding, catalytic activity in molecular function; heterotrimeric G protein signaling Gi alpha pathway, Huntington disease, endothelin signaling pathway, angiogenesis, interleukin signaling pathway, etc., in pathway as per PANTHER database.

High proliferative and antiapoptotic potential are related to the up-regulation of growth hormone receptor and calmodulins [31]. The top 20 genes which were found to be up-regulated in SCC early passage cells in comparison to SCC horn tissue were investigated to have roles in other cancers as well as SCC in human and domestic animals (Table-7) [32-61] and vice versa (Table-8) [62-95].

Table-7.

Functions of highly expressed genes in SCC early passage cells in comparison to SCC horn tissue.

Gene ID (ENSBTAG) Gene title Name FPKM EP FPKM HCT Log2 fold change Roles and implications in cancer of human and other
00000002834 CCDC69 Coiled-coil domain containing 69 318.123 2.3446 +7.084 Expressed in various cancer cell lines such as HeLa, U2OS and MDA-MB-231, exogenous expression of CCDC69 in HeLa cells destabilized microtubules and disrupted the formation of bipolar mitotic spindles [32]
00000012830 CCDC94 Coiled-coil domain containing 94 842.151 10.503 +6.325 Avoids DNA damaging apoptosis in zebra-fish [33]
00000014971 SEC61G Sec61 gamma subunit 4614.43 62.285 +6.211 Proto-oncogene required for tumor cell survival in GBM, involved in the cytoprotective ER stress–adaptive response to the tumor microenvironment [34]
00000008583 KIAA1274 Paladin 207.836 2.808 +6.209 Vascular-restricted expression in human brain, astrocytoma, and glioblastomas. Paladin expression is reactivated during pathological tumor angiogenesis in the - adult [35]
00000048213 PTCH1 Hh receptor patched homolog 1, Uncharacterized protein 92.8954 1.2552 +6.209 Inversely correlated with the metastatic potential of colon cancer cell lines, high expression associated with low Hh signaling [36]
00000003183 NTN4 Netrin 4 123.963 2.010 +5.946 Anti angiogenic effect, over expression could decrease tumor growth [37]
00000010232 NDUFS5 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) Fe-S protein 5, 15 kDa (NADH-coenzyme Q reductase) 1206.46 24.433 +5.625 Highly expressed in endometrial cancer [38,85]
00000019417 ARMCX2 Armadillo repeat containing, X-linked 2 145.59 2.950 +5.624 Might have a role in tumor suppression, role in development and tissue integrity [39]
00000021158 SATB1 SATB homeobox 1 161.255 3.7353 +5.431 High levels of SATB1 expression facilitate CRC and are associated with poor prognosis, promotes breast cancer metastasis, EMT marker in prostrate cancer [40]
00000003130 CHRNA3 Cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 3 (neuronal) 1615.84 43.60 +5.211 Polymorphism associated with high chance for NSCLC [41,85]
00000017633 EIF1AX Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1A, X linked 509.347 13.759 +5.210 Mutation is having protective role in uveal melanoma, over expressed in metastatic prostate cancer [42,43]
00000002428 PPA2 Pyrophosphatase (inorganic) 2 255.495 6.903 +5.209 Significantly increased in LNMPCa tissues, supplies increased energy requirement in metastasis - cells [44,45]
00000000753 PIAS4 Protein inhibitor of activated STAT, 4 582.593 17.174 +5.084 Necessary for proficient DNA repair of DSBs, promotes BRCA1 SUMOylation and DNA - repair [46,47]
00000013081 PSPH Phosphoserine phosphatase 516.471 17.942 +4.847 Up-regulated in CRC, increased expression in non-small-cell lung cancer corresponds to clinical response. Suppression inhibited proliferation, tumor formation of MDAMB-468 and MCF10 cells respectively [48,49]
00000002953 TXN Thioredoxin 3783.39 136.25 +4.795 Promote cell growth, induces VEGF, PTEN, angiogenesis and inhibit apoptosis in tumor - cells [50,51]
00000015522 MRPS31 Mitochondrial ribosomal protein S31 310.988 12.604 +4.624 Up-regulated in human breast cancer, CRC and found in 77% of all types of cancer [52,53,85]
00000045742 C5H12orf75 Chromosome 12 open reading frame 75 148.477 6.018 +4.624 Highly expressed in granulosa cells and membrane associated granulosa cells before ovulation in cattle [54]
00000009405 TRPC4 Transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 4 51.582 2.091 +4.624 Highly expressed in NSCLC, LNCaP cells activating store operated channel calcium influx - factor [55,56]
00000008636 PDE4B Phosphodiesterase 4B, cAMP-specific 41.5034 1.6824 +4.624 Highly expressed in diffuse large BCL, expression of it avoids CAMP mediated apoptosis. Induces angiogenesis and cell proliferation in lung cancer cell line [57,58]
00000008294 KCNJ2 Potassium inwardly-rectifying channel, subfamily J, member 2 35.2224 1.4278 +4.624 Expressed in medulloblastoma with poor clinical outcome, avoids apoptosis and induces cell proliferation in oral cancer also. Increased expression in papillary thyroid cancer [59-61]

EP=SCC early passage cells, HCT=SCC horn tissue, CAMP=Cyclic adenosine monophosphate, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, CCDC69=Coiled-coil domain containing 69, ER=Endoplasmic reticulum, GBM=Glioblastoma multiforme, Hh=Hedgehog, NADH=Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, CRC=Colorectal cancer, EMT=Epithelial mesenchymal transition, NSCLC=Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, LNM=Lymph node metastasis, VEGF=Vascular endothelial growth factor, BCL=B-cell lymphoma, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million

Table-8.

Functions of highly expressed genes in SCC horn tissue in comparison to SCC early passage cells.

Gene ID (ENSBTAG) Gene title Name FPKM HCT FPKM EP Log2 fold change Roles and implications in cancer of human and other
00000000711 NDRG1 N-Myc downstream regulated 1 2001.28 30.4749 −6.03715 Regulated by androgens, acts as metastasis suppressor and negatively correlated with it, found to be down regulated in various cancers, prostate cancer [62,63]
00000017266 ITGA6 Integrin, alpha 6 835.447 21.8316 −5.2580 Prostate tumors persistently express ITGA6, linked to increased tumor cell invasion, migration, and metastasis. Increased adhesion in AML - cells [64,65]
00000020097 PERP PERP, TP53 apoptosis effector 1624.07 47.026 −5.11001 Tumor suppressor. Loss induces tumorigenesis, cell survival, and desmosome loss by enhancing inflammatory set of genes in - SCCs [66,67]
00000000132 EIF4A1 Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4A1 1613.66 54.0897 −4.8988 Associated with highly metastasizing melanoma. Overexpression is an early marker for metastasizing hepatocellular carcinoma and NSCLC [68,69]
00000015106 DSP Desmoplakin 1837.68 63.9491 −4.8448 Loss of desmoplakin, a cell adhesion molecule, has been implicated in breast cancer metastasis [70]
00000047330 FABP5 Fatty acid binding protein 5 (psoriasis associated) 1255.27 51.7861 −4.5992 Involved in cell survival and growth, enhances cell proliferation and anchorage-independent growth in prostate and breast cancer - cells [71,72]
00000012447 PPP1CB Protein phosphatase 1, catalytic subunit, beta isozyme 764.459 34.5396 −4.4681 Enhances proliferation and colony formation in leukemia cell line, expressed in 55 cancer cell lines [73,74]
00000010365 SQRDL Sulphide quinone reductase-like (yeast) 1206.17 57.2255 −4.3976 Under expressed in ductal breast carcinoma, but down regulation reduce cell growth and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cell line [75,76]
00000011969 HSPB1 Heat shock 27 kDa protein 1 2770.43 137.28 −4.3349 Involved in DNA repair, recombination, anti-apoptotic activity in HeLa cells, in most of human cancers, high levels indicate presence of metastatic tissues. Low levels are associated with resistance [77,78]
00000011488 PRPF8 PRP8 pre-mRNA processing factor 8 homolog (S. cerevisiae) 230.594 11.6561 −4.3062 Associated with spliceosome pathway, tumor suppressor in myeloid malignancies [79,80]
00000012927 ALDOA Aldolase A, fructose-bisphosphate, mRNA 1162.91 60.5281 −4.2639 Promote lung cancer metastasis, invasion capability [81,82]
00000015107 SLC16A1 Solute carrier family 16, member 1 (monocarboxylic acid transporter 1) 465.287 28.411 −4.0336 Positively associated with cell survival, negatively with mir-124 in medulloblastoma [83]
00000021035 CTSK Cathepsin K, mRNA 917.7 56.0406 −4.0334 Inconsistent expression in horn cancer tissue in bovine, involved in Hh signaling and pre-osteoclast to osteoclast differentiation in breast cancer [84,86]
00000010793 CCDC80 CCDC80, mRNA 393.218 24.1296 −4.0264 Tumor suppressor, down regulated in thyroid carcinomas [87]
00000013315 ATP5B ATP synthase, H+ transporting, mitochondrial F1 complex, beta polypeptide, mRNA 853.925 53.4692 −3.9973 Overexpressed and associated with poor survival in breast cancer. High ATP5B mRNA expression in ovarian cancer was associated with worse OS [88]
00000003418 MSN Moesin (MSN), mRNA 339.836 22.2957 −3.93 High levels associated with poor breast cancer survival, by increased metastasis, invasion and EMT - changes [89]
00000008409 MYC V-myc myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (avian) 596.739 41.8222 −3.8347 Correlated with distant metastasis, aggressive breast cancer. Induces genome instability [90]
00000021523 STAT3 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (acute-phase response factor), mRNA 566.044 39.895 −3.8266 Associated with increased angiogenesis, metastasis, immune signaling and inflammation in basal like breast - cancers [91,92]
00000008611 IGFBP4 Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 627.819 44.5065 −3.8182 Antagonist of wnt beta catenin signaling pathway, higher in metastatic RCC. Increases invasion, cell proliferation in glioma [93,94]
00000007606 HNRNPU Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein U (scaffold attachment factor A), mRNA 386.733 28.0595 −3.7847 Involved in spliceosome pathway in causing prostate cancer [95]

EP=SCC early passage cells, HCT=SCC horn tissue, NSCLC=Non-small cell lung cancer, ITGA6=Integrin, alpha 6, AML=Acute myeloid leukemia, ATP=Adenosine triphosphate, EMT=Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, RCC=Renal cell carcinoma, SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million, S. cerevisiae=Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Discussion

In this study, we compared gene expression profiles of the two conditions, i.e., in vivo cancer tissue and in vitro cancer cells at their early passages. The growth and survival rate of SCC early passage cells were good and it grew for the first few passages without difficulties. The cellular compositions were homogeneous and were of morphological characteristics typical of squamous cell epithelium. These findings are more or less similar to previously described studies [31] that indicated that early passage cell cultures expressed genes similar to in vivo gene expression pattern. Hence, it could be used for in vitro investigation of transcriptomic alteration in cancers. Maximum value of differential gene expression in SCC early passage cells was 6.02-fold changes as compared to parental tissue. CCDC94 a dose-dependent modifier of the anti-apoptotic function of B-cell lymphoma 2 gene found to be up-regulated [96] in SCC early passage cells; PTCH1 overexpression might indicate invasive behavior of metastatic cells [97]; low Hh signaling [98] (Table-9). PTCH-1 overexpression in many epithelial-derived cancers correlates to overexpression of other “Hh pathway” members [99] and promotion of an alternate epidermal cell fate decision that potentiates SCC formation [100]. Netrin 4 overexpression might have control on reduced angiogenesis and metastasis [101]; high SATB homeobox 1 expression might have helped to promote cell cycle progression, proliferation, migration and increased invasive capability with strong expression of Vimentin (2750.61 FPKM) but low or lost E-cadherin (CDH1) expression - A pivotal event for epithelial to mesenchymal transition EMT [102]. EIF41A, X-linked gene overexpression along with EIF2A gene (fold change −0.56) downregulation shows improved cell proliferation as EIF2A gene is a negative regulator of protein translation, RPS7 gene overexpression (fold change −0.88) might have role in cancer cell cycle proliferation and cell cycle progression in BHCC early passage cells [103]. 14-3-3 gamma was not expressed in BHCC early passage cells denoting that 14-3-3 gamma might not be working at transcriptional level, but 14-3-3 theta which was found to be increased (fold change 0.30) might had a positive effect on tumor cell adhesion and growth [104]. In correlation to that Stratifin or 14-3-3 sigma was not expressed in BHCC early passage cells. Cyclin D1 (FPKM in BHCC early passage cells is ~86) which usually acts as an active switch for regulation of continuous cell cycle progression, had almost same expression in two samples, revealing the possible cycle chain in between these key players. Phosphoserine phosphatase [105]; inorganic pyrophosphates have a role in energy transduction, DNA replication and other metabolic processes that usually deregulate in cancer cells. It has been postulated that protein phosphatases are involved in the suppression of cellular growth and cancer development by antagonizing protein kinases in human cancers. Protein phosphatase 2 subunit B isoform alpha (PPP2R2A) is one of the four major Ser/Thr phosphatases and is a potential tumor suppressor gene [106], PP2, regulatory subunit B, epsilon isoform (PPP2R5E) expression are usually downregulated in cancer tissue and represses cell viability and growth promoting apoptosis in cells as a target of MicroRNA-23a (miR-23a) [107]. MiR-23a overexpression decreases PPP2R5E expression but as the cells were good and healthy by their phenotypes so we cannot support this hypothesis for our cell line. Glutaminase which indicates faster growth rate and change in Warburg effect [108] was increased (0.33-fold change) (not shown in table) in cells though, MYC oncogenic transcription factor expression in BHCC early passage cells was lower than BHCC tissue, and there was no expression of MiR-23a/b which are usually suppressed by MYC [109]. Solute carrier family 7A5, phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase decreased in cells, ACACA expression remained almost same, but ACLY expression was 1.5-fold lower in cells (Table-10). SERBP1 expression was also lower in cells by 1.5-fold. Moderate secretory carrier membrane proteins 3 expressions suggested a universal role in membrane traffic at the plasma membrane [110,111].

Table-9.

Expression of genes that are usually altered in cancer and involved in cancer pathways.

Official gene symbol SCC horn tissue FPKM SCC early passage cells FPKM Log2 (fold change) Official gene symbol SCC horn tissue FPKM SCC early passage cells FPKM Log2 (fold change) Official gene symbol SCC horn tissue FPKM SCC early passage cells FPKM Log2 (fold change)
Genes involved in TGF beta pathway [114] Tumor suppressor genes [114] Apoptosis [114]
TGFB2 37.681 116.199 1.62466 PTCH1 1.25528 92.8954 6.20952 CDK2AP1 109.22 354.565 1.6988
TGFBR1 43.997 180.905 2.03972 ZFHX4 9.4298 15.5071 0.717634 CDK14 21.499 106.068 2.30264
TGFBI 381.88 71.3708 −2.41975 SDHB 298.285 108.237 −1.4625 CDKN1A 164.35 116.955 −0.4908
TGFB1I1 81.946 53.198 −0.62321 TP53INP1 109.129 15.4711 −2.81839 TNFRSF1B 17.236 85.0433 2.30275
CTGF 1237.8 1486.66 0.26426 TP53BP1 21.8765 28.4023 0.376625 TNFRSF1B 17.236 85.0433 2.30275
TGFB2 37.681 116.199 1.62466 WTIP 6.28321 38.751 2.62466 TNFRSF19 0 64.8309
TERT 0 53.0329 STK25 28.8784 59.3717 1.03979 WDR44 0 90.9718
CDKs [114] GSTK1 36.2615 111.844 1.62498 WDR45L 89.843 246.268 1.45474
CDKN1A 164.35 116.955 −0.4908 CTSC 337.901 48.4657 −2.80156 WDR48 50.640 44.6152 −0.1827
CDK16 59.044 58.2622 −0.01924 RB1 7.81432 16.0636 1.0396 APAF1 10.494 21.5734 1.03962
CDK2AP1 109.221 354.565 1.6988 RNF130 72.5241 137.638 0.92435 TNFAIP8L 36.440 89.9108 1.30295
CDK14 21.4991 106.068 2.30264 ZNF189 9.8045 30.2333 1.62462 TNFRSF1B 17.236 85.0433 2.30275
Genes highly expressed in cell, tumor [114] RNF11 78.2997 307.308 1.9726 TNFRSF19 0 64.8309 Infinity
SPARC 5788.5 1127.85 −2.35963 RNF13 23.1794 122.535 2.40228 C1QTNF3 132.88 100.355 −0.40511
Genes expressed in immortal cell lines [114] CDKN1A 164.35 116.955 −0.49082 TNFAIP8L1 27.853 34.3557 0.30271
TOP1 160.34 47.6561 −1.75045 SMAD4 105.153 102.396 −0.03833 APC pathway [114]
PCNA 251.05 46.9208 −2.4197 Stability genes [114] LRP12 84.539 38.6188 −1.13031
CDC26 0 276.369 Infinity ATM 19.4638 9.2331 −1.07591 LRP4 7.1667 14.7322 1.03959
CDC2L1 52.649 30.9242 −0.76769 ATMIN 50.0996 19.9333 −1.32962 APC 14.067 8.26207 −0.7677
CDC27 37.956 16.7198 −1.18279 BRCA1 20.3512 15.6881 −0.37544 MYC 596.73 41.8222 −3.8347
Tumor suppressor genes [114] Oncogenes [114] CCND1 89.928 85.3383 −0.0755
APC 14.067 8.26207 −0.76779 MET 4.43146 18.2192 2.03961
Tumor suppressor genes [114] List of genes that are usually altered in cancer [115] List of genes that are usually altered in cancer [115]
EXT1 152.414 63.7274 −1.25801 KLF10 175.839 65.7242 −1.41976 AOX1 26.1803 37.9893 0.53711
EXT2 47.495 92.4998 0.96166 KLF5 207.845 134.928 −0.62332 BUB1 15.4024 23.7471 0.624594
GLi pathway [114] KLF6 217.105 306.05 0.495374 NME1 264.994 163.488 −0.69677
EXT1 152.414 63.7274 −1.25801 TPX2 113.49 31.1076 −1.86723 PCDH18 6.99252 103.495 3.8876
EXT2 47.495 92.4998 0.96166 ACAT1 141.472 62.3266 −1.18259 PCDH17 3.49188 21.5346 2.62458
PTCH1 1.2552 92.8954 6.20952 CDC27 37.9565 16.7198 −1.18279 PCDH7 18.0213 17.098 −0.07587
CCND1 89.928 85.3383 −0.0755 CDC2L1 52.6498 30.9242 −0.76769 ABCA3 6.16494 30.4151 2.30263
PI3K pathway [114] CDC26 0 276.369 NMT1 58.3807 45.0079 −0.37531
SCAMP3 135.784 139.585 0.03983 MCM3AP 51.0153 28.6007 −0.83488 PRC1 97.9744 30.2115 −1.69731
NAMPT 19.696 69.4103 1.81721 SERBP1 565.676 213.062 −1.4087 PTTG1IP 207.906 122.119 −0.76765
AKTIP 61.4721 42.9791 −0.5163 NRBP1 140.308 129.802 −0.11229 SHMT1 20.3035 35.7767 0.817291
CTSC 337.90 48.4657 −2.80156 CIRBP 58.5565 57.7807 −0.01924 RRM2 81.5659 61.1926 −0.41461
LAMTOR5 65.978 203.559 1.62537 CDH13 11.6941 48.0794 2.03963 TOP1 160.345 47.6561 −1.75045
LAMTOR4 0 207.588 COL4A1 156.377 60.2731 −1.37544 SCFD1 24.4279 129.136 2.40229
AEBP1 269.61 95.0153 −1.50469 ENO1 1156.36 581.125 −0.99266 NAP1L4 142.404 83.6444 −0.76765
RPS6KA4 26.142 29.3143 0.165186 RBFOX2 68.9153 28.3343 −1.28228 SPP1 909.522 965.956 0.086848
RPS6KB1 69.345 183.303 1.40236 FOXN3 47.44 22.9456 −1.04788 CCNE2 19.4415 137.03 2.81728
RPS6KC1 27.447 19.9144 −0.46289 FOXJ2 29.0679 29.878 0.039658 CCNY 154.802 65.8485 −1.2332
BCL2L13 12.845 118.832 3.20963 PRKAR1A 534.133 67.9277 −2.97513 TRMT10A 4.72355 58.2622 3.62462
Oncogenes [114] PRKAR2A 141.262 62.2342 −1.18259 ARHGAP24 13.8698 68.4312 2.30271
METTL13 8.588 35.31 2.03968 TGFBI 381.889 71.3708 −2.41975 New cancer genes [115]
PDGFRA 55.2793 12.8642 −2.10337 TGFBR1 43.9979 180.905 2.03972 ITM2B 731.712 364.724 −1.00447
Hh pathway [114] THBS2 295.379 41.8762 −2.81836 NUP205 37.2026 55.6184 0.580157
ARNTL 5.52379 39.7419 2.84693 CKAP2 70.1512 112.865 0.686055 FAT1 168.926 148.005 −0.19075
UBE2C 150.04 142.406 −0.07533 ITM2C 95.1238 45.129 −1.07575

SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million, TGF=Transforming growth factor

Table-10.

Genes commonly deregulated in cancer.

Official gene symbol SCC horn tissue FPKM SCC early passage cells FPKM Log2 (fold change) Official gene symbol SCC horn tissue FPKM SCC early passage cells FPKM Log2 (fold change)
Genes up regulated in most cancers [110] IQGAP3 13.3333 14.9501 0.16512
ZBTB11 51.1437 93.4543 0.86970
IPO7 330.60 70.3061 −2.2333 RPN2 308.245 578.589 0.90846
FKBP10 125.032 34.2715 −1.86721 IPO4 24.7048 50.7859 1.03964
PRC1 97.974 30.2115 −1.69731 FARP1 25.0428 57.9149 1.20954
FNDC3B 79.1106 25.3438 −1.64224 TMEM41B 35.6942 82.5496 1.20957
ILF3 79.5314 25.8148 −1.62332 TTLL4 18.5496 45.7588 1.30266
ACLY 121.74 41.7097 −1.54534 GEMIN6 66.7981 164.81 1.30292
ADAM12 69.750 29.6667 −1.23336 CALU 213.254 563.68 1.4023
PSMB2 315.665 139.101 −1.1822 SNX10 17.7203 72.8583 2.03969
EIF2AK1 56.6175 31.7431 −0.8348 RBAK 12.6522 93.6353 2.88766
NME1 264.99 163.488 −0.6967 EPRS 0 36.3044
ADAM10 58.022 39.761 −0.5452 PGK1 0 277.607
ANP32E 196.546 138.547 −0.5044 WISP2 0 257.533
HNRPLL 43.4377 31.5166 −0.4628 Commonly down regulated genes in most cancers [110]
FAM49B 148.32 107.624 −0.4627 ERBB2IP 54.7664 56.29 0.03958
EIF2S2 396.41 344.378 −0.2030 DHRS4 64.1568 65.9521 0.03981
KDELR3 213.373 202.472 −0.0756
SPP1 909.522 965.956 0.08684
UTP18 44.7713 50.2058 0.16527
ZBTB1 42.3114 49.7028 0.23228

SCC=Squamous cell carcinoma, FPKM=Fragments per kilobase of exon per million

Cytoplasmic serine hydroxymethyltransferase 1 (SHMT1) and thymidylate synthase genes of the de novo thymidylate biosynthesis pathway were found to be increased in early passage cells than BHCC tissue, but SHMT2 was not expressed in cells [110,112,113]. Tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1, apoptosis activating factor-1 was found to be increased in BHCC early passage cells (>1-fold change) along with effector genes such as caspase 6 (CASP6) and caspase 9 (CASP9) (>2-fold change) but in contrast cytochrome C was not found to be expressed and the genes CASP3, CASP8 were not detected [114]. The above discussion denotes a number of key players in pathogenesis of SCC of horns in bovines which showed resemblance with human cancer studies in expression profiling.

Conclusion

The signaling pathway investigation in this first culture based approach revealed that many of the cancer-related pathways reported in the literatures for other carcinomas may also be held responsible for SCC of horn in bovines. Cells from bovine horn SCC surgical specimens may be adapted in vitro with high efficiency, independently from any clinicopathological characteristics.

Low-passage horn cancer cell lines would still closely reflect the phenotype of the horn cancer cells in vitro bypassing the obstacle for obtaining more detailed insights into the diversity of phenotypic and molecular changes occurring in horn cancer cells. Our result based on the pathway analysis suggested that primary culture of horn cancer in-vitro may serve as the model for SCC of horns in cattle.

This transcriptome-based approach demonstrates that epithelial cultures isolated from primary horn SCC retain complex characteristics of the malignant tissue. Thus, the opportunity for basic and clinical application of functional cells derived from SCC horn tissue, instead of a few immortal cell lines should not be missed.

Authors’ Contributions

SS: Carried out laboratory experiment and written manuscript as part of MVSc. in Animal Genetics and Breeding. RSJ: Helped in manuscript correction. CGJ: Conceptualized the project. AKP: Helped in tissue culture work. RKS: Helped in tissue culture work. NP: Helped in bioinformatics work. SJJ: Helped in NGS work. SK: Helped in manuscript writing. BR: Helped in bioinformatics work. PGK: Helped in NGS work and sample collection. DNR: Helped in manuscript correction and improvement. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely acknowledge the help provided by Dr. M. G. Mardiya (Rajkot), Dr. Uday Koringa (Rajkot) during sample collection and Dr. J. V. Solanki (Anand) for valuable insights into the experiment. The authors thankfully acknowledge the funding provided by Anand Agricultural University under the project “Centre of Excellence in Animal Biotechnology” (B.H. 12928).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Yang D.S. Novel prediction of anticancer drug chemosensitivity in cancer cell lines: Evidence of moderation by microRNA expressions. Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Annual Conference. 2014:4780–4786. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wei W, Liu Z, Chen X, Bi F. Chemosensitivity of resistant colon cancer cell lines to lobaplatin, heptaplatin and dicycloplatin. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2014;52(8):702–707. doi: 10.5414/CP202023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De la Cueva A, Ramirez de Molina A, Alvarez-Ayerza N, Ramos M.A, Cebrian A, Del Pulgar T.G, Lacal J.C. Combined 5-FU and ChoKalpha inhibitors as a new alternative therapy of colorectal cancer: Evidence in human tumor-derived cell lines and mouse xenografts. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e64961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Giuffrida D, Rogers I.M. Targeting cancer stem cell lines as a new treatment of human cancer. Rec. Patents Anti Cancer Drug Discov. 2010;5(3):205–218. doi: 10.2174/157489210791760535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Supino R, Binaschi M, Capranico G, Gambetta R.A, Prosperi E, Sala E, Zunino F. A study of cross-resistance pattern and expression of molecular markers of multidrug resistance in a human small-cell lung-cancer cell line selected with doxorubicin. Int. J. Cancer. 1993;54(2):309–314. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910540224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lefevre D, Riou J.F, Ahomadegbe J.C, Zhou D.Y, Benard J, Riou G. Study of molecular markers of resistance to m-AMSA in a human breast cancer cell line. Decrease of topoisomerase II and increase of both topoisomerase I and acidic glutathione S transferase. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1991;41(12):1967–1979. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90138-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cifola I, Bianchi C, Mangano E, Bombelli S, Frascati F, Fasoli E, Ferrero S, Di Stifano V, Zipeto M.A, Magni F, Signorini S, Battaglia C, Perego R.A. Renal cell carcinoma primary cultures maintain genomic and phenotypic profile of parental tumor tissues. BMC Cancer. 2011;11(1):244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Craven R.A, Stanley A.J, Hanrahan S, Dods J, Unwin R, Totty N, Harnden P, Eardley I, Selby P.J, Banks R.E. Proteomic analysis of primary cell lines identifies protein changes present in renal cell carcinoma. Proteomics. 2006;6(9):2853–2864. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200500549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perego R.A, Bianchi C, Corizzato M, Eroini B, Torsello B, Valsecchi C, Di Fonzo A, Cordani N, Favini P, Ferrero S, Pitto M, Sarto C, Magni F, Rocco F, Mocarelli P. Primary cell cultures arising from normal kidney and renal cell carcinoma retain the proteomic profile of corresponding tissues. J. Proteome Res. 2005;4(5):1503–1510. doi: 10.1021/pr050002o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bianchi C, Bombelli S, Raimondo F, Torsello B, Angeloni V, Ferrero S, Di Stefano V, Chinello C, Cifola I, Invernizzi L, Brambilla P, Magni F, Pitto M, Zanetti G, Mocarelli P, Perego R.A. Primary cell cultures from human renal cortex and renal-cell carcinoma evidence a differential expression of two spliced isoforms of Annexin A3. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176(4):1660–1670. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Twine N.A, Janitz K, Wilkins M.R, Janitz M. Whole transcriptome sequencing reveals gene expression and splicing differences in brain regions affected by Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Naik S.N, Balakrishna C.R, Randelia H.P. Epidemiology of horn cancer in Indian zebu cattle: Breed incidences. Br. Vet. J. 1969;125:222–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Joshi B.P, Soni P.B, Fefar D.T, Ghodasara D.J, Prajapati K.S. Epidemiological and pathological aspects of horn cancer in cattle of Gujarat. Indian J. Field Vet. 2009;5:15–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Burggraaf H. Kanker aan de basis van de hoorns bijzebus. T. Diergeneesk. 1935;62:1121–1136. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rezende A.M.L, Naves P.T. Horn core cancer in a zebu cow, imported to Brazil. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. Ser. Vet. 1975;10:41–44. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zubaidy A.J. Horn cancer in cattle in Iraq. Vet. Pathol. 1976;13:435–454. doi: 10.1177/030098587601300608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kulkarni H.V. Carcinoma of horn in bovines of Old Baroda state. Indian Vet. J. 1953;29:415–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Damodaran S, Sundararaj A, Ramakrishnan R. Horn cancer in bulls. Indian Vet. J. 1979;56:248–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gupta R.K, Sadana J.R, Kuchroo V.K, Kalra D.S. Horn cancer in an intact bull. Vet. Rec. 1980;107:312. doi: 10.1136/vr.107.13.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chattopadhyay S.K, Jandrotia V.S, Ramkumar Iyer P.K.R. Horn cancer in sheep. Indian Vet. J. 1982;59:319–320. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Luna L.G, editor. Pathology AFIo. Manual of Histologic Staining Methods;of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. New York: Blakiston Division, McGraw-Hill; 1968. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Freshney R.I. Culture of Cells for Tissue Engineering. Hobokan, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2006. Basic principles of cell culture; pp. 3–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Roth V. 2006. [Accessed on 18-12-2016]. Available from: http://www.doubling-time.com/compute.php .
  • 24.Koringa P.G, Jakhesara S.J, Bhatt V.D, Meshram C.P, Patel A.K, Fefar D.T, Joshi C.G. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling of squamous cell carcinoma of horn in Bos indicus. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2013 doi: 10.1111/vco.12079. DOI: 10.1111/vco.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu T.D, Watanabe C.K. GMAP: A genomic mapping and alignment program for mRNA and EST sequences. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):1859–1875. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Trapnell C, Williams B.A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren M.J, Salzberg S.L, Wold B.J, Pachter L. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–515. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Huang D.W, Sherman B.T, Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Prot. 2008;4(1):44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thomas P.D, Kejariwal A, Guo N, Mi H, Campbell M.J, Muruganujan A, Ulitsky B.L. Applications for protein sequence–function evolution data: mRNA/protein expression analysis and coding SNP scoring tools. Nuc. Acids Res. 2006;34:W645–W650. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gao J, Wu H, Wang L, Zhang H, Duan H, Lu J, Liang Z. Validation of targeted next-generation sequencing for RAS mutation detection in FFPE colorectal cancer tissues: Comparison with Sanger sequencing and ARMS-Scorpion real-time PCR. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e009532. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koringa P.G, Jakhesara S.J, Bhatt V.D, Meshram C.P, Patel A.K, Fefar D.T, Joshi C.G. Comprehensive transcriptome profiling of squamous cell carcinoma of horn in Bos indicus. Vet. Comp. Oncol. 2016;14(2):122–136. doi: 10.1111/vco.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Król M, Polańska J, Pawłowski K.M, Turowski P, Skierski J, Majewska A, Ugorski M, Morty R.E, Motyl T. Transcriptomic signature of cell lines isolated from canine mammary adenocarcinoma metastases to lungs. J. Appl. Genet. 2010;51(1):37–50. doi: 10.1007/BF03195709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pal D, Wu D, Haruta A, Matsumura F, Wei Q. Role of a novel coiled-coil domain-containing protein CCDC69 in regulating central spindle assembly. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(20):4117–4129. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.20.13387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sorrells S, Carbonneau S, Harrington E, Chen A.T, Hast B, Milash B, Pyati U, Major M.B, Zhou Y, Zon L.I, Stewart R.A, Look A.T, Jette C. Ccdc94 protects cells from ionizing radiation by inhibiting the expression of p53. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lu Z, Zhou L, Killela P, Rasheed A.B, Di C, Poe W.E, McLendon R.E, Bigner D.D, Nicchitta C, Yan H. Glioblastoma proto-oncogene SEC61γ is required for tumor cell survival and response to endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cancer Res. 2009;69(23):9105–9111. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wallgard E, Nitzsche A, Larsson J, Guo X, Dieterich L.C, Dimberg A, Olofsson T, Pontén F.C, Mäkinen T, Kalén M, Hellström M. Paladin (X99384) is expressed in the vasculature and shifts from endothelial to vascular smooth muscle cells during mouse development. Dev. Dyn. 2012;241(4):770–786. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.23753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang H, Ke F, Zheng J. Hedgehog-glioma-associated oncogene homolog-1 signaling in colon cancer cells and its role in the celecoxib-mediated anti-cancer effect. Oncol. Lett. 2014;8(5):2203–2208. doi: 10.3892/ol.2014.2439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhao M, Tang Q, Wu W, Xia Y, Chen D, Wang X. miR-20a contributes to endometriosis by regulating NTN4 expression. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014;41(9):5793–5797. doi: 10.1007/s11033-014-3452-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang L, McDonnell S.K, Hebbring S.J, Cunningham J.M, St. Sauver J, Cerhan J.R, Isaya G, Schaid D.J, Thibodeau S.N. Polymorphisms in mitochondrial genes and prostate cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17(12):3558–3566. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zeller C, Dai W, Steele N.L, Siddiq A, Walley A.J, Wilhelm-Benartzi C.S.M, Rizzo S, Van Der Zee A, Plumb J.A, Brown R. Candidate DNA methylation drivers of acquired cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer identified by methylome and expression profiling. Oncogene. 2012;31(42):4567–4576. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brocato J, Costa M. SATB1 and 2 in colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2015;36(2):186–191. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgu322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xiao M, Chen L, Wu X, Wen F. The association between the rs6495309 polymorphism in CHRNA3 gene and lung cancer risk in Chinese: A meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:6372. doi: 10.1038/srep06372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ewens K.G, Kanetsky P.A, Richards-Yutz J, Purrazzella J, Shields C.L, Ganguly T, Ganguly A. Chromosome 3 status combined with BAP1 and EIF1AX mutation profiles are associated with metastasis in uveal melanoma gene mutations associated with metastasis in UM. Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 2014;55(8):5160–5167. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chandran U.R, Ma C, Dhir R, Bisceglia M, Lyons-Weiler M, Liang W, Michalopoulos G, Becich M, Monzon F.A. Gene expression profiles of prostate cancer reveal involvement of multiple molecular pathways in the metastatic process. BMC Cancer. 2007;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-7-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pang J, Liu W.P, Liu X.P, Li L.Y, Fang Y.Q, Sun Q.P, Liu S.J, Li M.T, Su Z.L, Gao X. Profiling protein markers associated with lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer by DIGE based proteomics analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2009;9(1):216–226. doi: 10.1021/pr900953s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schönthal A.H. Role of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2A in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2001;170(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00561-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bartek J, Hodny Z. SUMO boosts the DNA damage response barrier against cancer. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(1):9–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wei J, Costa C, Ding Y, Zou Z, Yu L, Sanchez J.J, Qian X, Chen H, Gimenez-Capitan A, Meng F, Moran T. mRNA expression of BRCA1, PIAS1, and PIAS4 and survival after second-line docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011;103(20):1552–1556. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jovov B, Araujo-Perez F, Sigel C.S, Stratford J.K, McCoy A.N, Yeh J.J, Keku T. Differential gene expression between African American and European American colorectal cancer patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Possemato R, Marks K.M, Shaul Y.D, Pacold M.E, Kim D, Birsoy K, Sethumadhavan S, Woo H.K, Jang H.G, Jha A.K, Chen W.W. Functional genomics reveal that the serine synthesis pathway is essential in breast cancer. Nature. 2011;476(7360):346–350. doi: 10.1038/nature10350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cadenas C, Franckenstein D, Schmidt M, Gehrmann M, Hermes M, Geppert B, Schormann W, Maccoux L.J, Schug M, Schumann A, Wilhelm C. Role of thioredoxin reductase 1 and thioredoxin interacting protein in prognosis of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(3):1. doi: 10.1186/bcr2599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Arner E.S, Holmgren A. The thioredoxin system in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2006;16(6):420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sotgia F, Menezes D.W, Outschoorn U.E, Salem A.F, Tsirigos A, Lamb R, Sneddon S, Hulit J, Howell A, Lisanti M.P. Mitochondria “fuel” breast cancer metabolism: Fifteen markers of mitochondrial biogenesis label epithelial cancer cells, but are excluded from adjacent stromal cells. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(23):4390–4401. doi: 10.4161/cc.22777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Budinska E, Popovici V, Tejpar S, D’Ario G, Lapique N, Sikora K.O, Di Narzo A.F, Yan P, Hodgson J.G, Weinrich S, Bosman F. Gene expression patterns unveil a new level of molecular heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. J. Pathol. 2013;231(1):63–76. doi: 10.1002/path.4212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Christenson L.K, Gunewardena S, Hong X, Spitschak M, Baufeld A, Vanselow J. Research resource: Preovulatory LH surge effects on follicular theca and granulosa transcriptomes. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013;27(7):1153–1171. doi: 10.1210/me.2013-1093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Abeele F.V, Lemonnier L, Thébault S, Lepage G, Parys J.B, Shuba Y, Skryma R, Prevarskaya N. Two types of store-operated Ca2+channels with different activation modes and molecular origin in LNCaP human prostate cancer epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279(29):30326–30337. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M400106200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zhang Q, He J, Lu W, Yin W, Yang H, Xu X, Wang D. Expression of transient receptor potential canonical channel proteins in human non-small cell lung cancer. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2010;13(6):612–616. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2010.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kashiwagi E, Shiota M, Yokomizo A, Itsumi M, Inokuchi J, Uchiumi T, Naito S. Downregulation of phosphodiesterase 4B (PDE4B) activates protein kinase A and contributes to the progression of prostate cancer. Prostate. 2012;72(7):741–751. doi: 10.1002/pros.21478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mareddy J, Nallapati S.B, Anireddy J, Devi Y.P, Mangamoori L.N, Kapavarapu R, Pal S. Synthesis and biological evaluation of nimesulide based new class of triazole derivatives as potential PDE4B inhibitors against cancer cells. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013;23(24):6721–6727. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Valdora F, Freier F, Garzia L, Ramaswamy V, Seyler C, Hielscher T, Brady N, Northcott P.A, Kool M, Jones D.T, Witt H. KCNJ2 constitutes a marker and therapeutic target of high-risk medulloblastomas. Cancer Res. 2013;73(8 Suppl):5050. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kim H.S, Kim D.H, Kim J.Y, Jeoung N.H, Lee I.K, Bong J.G, Jung E.D. Microarray analysis of papillary thyroid cancers in Korean. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2010;25(4):399–407. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2010.25.4.399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Li Y.L. Silencing of KCNJ2, a potassium influx channel, increases cisplatin-induced cell death in oral cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(8 Suppl):2119. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kovacevic Z, Richardson D.R. The metastasis suppressor, Ndrg-1: A new ally in the fight against cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27(12):2355–2366. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ghalayini M.K, Dong Q, Richardson D.R, Assinder S.J. Proteolytic cleavage and truncation of NDRG1 in human prostate cancer cells, but not normal prostate epithelial cells. Biosci. Rep. 2013;33(3):e00042. doi: 10.1042/BSR20130042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yamakawa N, Kaneda K, Saito Y, Ichihara E, Morishita K. The increased expression of integrin α6 (ITGA6) enhances drug resistance in EVI1 high leukemia. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Cheng I, Plummer S.J, Neslund-Dudas C, Klein E.A, Casey G, Rybicki B.A, Witte J.S. Prostate cancer susceptibility variants confer increased risk of disease progression. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(9):2124–2132. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dusek R.L, Bascom J.L, Vogel H, Baron S, Borowsky A.D, Bissell M.J, Attardi L.D. Deficiency of the p53/p63 target Perp alters mammary gland homeostasis and promotes cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14(2):1. doi: 10.1186/bcr3171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Beaudry V.G, Jiang D, Dusek R.L, Park E.J, Knezevich S, Ridd K, Vogel H, Bastian B.C, Attardi L.D. Loss of the p53/p63 regulated desmosomal protein Perp promotes tumorigenesis. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(10):e1001168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Ji P, Diederichs S, Wang W, Böing S, Metzger R, Schneider P.M, Tidow N, Brandt B, Buerger H, Bulk E, Thomas M. MALAT-1, a novel noncoding RNA and thymosin β4 predict metastasis and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2003;22(39):8031–8041. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lomnytska M.I, Becker S, Gemoll T, Lundgren C, Habermann J, Olsson A, Bodin I, Engström U, Hellman U, Hellman K, Hellström A.C. Impact of genomic stability on protein expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106(7):1297–1305. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pang H, Rowan B.G, Al-Dhaheri M, Faber L.E. Epidermal growth factor suppresses induction by progestin of the adhesion protein desmoplakin in T47D breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(3):1. doi: 10.1186/bcr780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Morgan E, Kannan-Thulasiraman P, Noy N. Involvement of fatty acid binding protein 5 and PPAR/in prostate cancer cell growth. PPAR Res 2010. 2010 doi: 10.1155/2010/234629. Article ID: 234629, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Levi L, Lobo G, Doud M.K, Von Lintig J, Seachrist D, Tochtrop G.P, Noy N. Genetic ablation of the fatty acid-binding protein FABP5 suppresses HER2-induced mammary tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2013;73(15):4770–4780. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-0384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Takakura S, Kohno T, Manda R, Okamoto A, Tanaka T, Yokota J. Genetic alterations and expression of the protein phosphatase 1 genes in human cancers. Int. J. Oncol. 2001;18(4):817–824. doi: 10.3892/ijo.18.4.817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Velusamy T, Palanisamy N, Kalyana-Sundaram S, Sahasrabuddhe A.A, Maher C.A, Robinson D.R, Bahler D.W, Cornell T.T, Wilson T.E, Lim M.S, Chinnaiyan A.M. Recurrent reciprocal RNA chimera involving YPEL5 and PPP1CB in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2013;110(8):3035–3040. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214326110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Abba M.C, Drake J.A, Hawkins K.A, Hu Y, Sun H, Notcovich C, Gaddis S, Sahin A, Baggerly K, Aldaz C.M. Transcriptomic changes in human breast cancer progression as determined by serial analysis of gene expression. Breast Cancer Res. 2004;6(5):1. doi: 10.1186/bcr899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Honma K, Iwao-Koizumi K, Takeshita F, Yamamoto Y, Yoshida T, Nishio K, Nagahara S, Kato K, Ochiya T. RPN2 gene confers docetaxel resistance in breast cancer. Nat. Med. 2008;14(9):939–948. doi: 10.1038/nm.1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Arrigo A.P, Simon S, Gibert B, Remy C.K, Nivon M, Czekalla A, Guillet D, Moulin M, Diaz-Latoud C, Vicart P. Hsp27 (HspB1) and αB-crystallin (HspB5) as therapeutic targets. FEBS Lett. 2007;581(19):3665–3674. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.04.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Heinrich J.C, Tuukkanen A, Schroeder M, Fahrig T, Fahrig R. RP101 (brivudine) binds to heat shock protein HSP27 (HSPB1) and enhances survival in animals and pancreatic cancer patients. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2011;137(9):1349–1361. doi: 10.1007/s00432-011-1005-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Fan J, Zhang Y.Q, Li P, Tong C, Tan L, Zhu Y.S. Interaction between plasminogen activator inhibitor type-2 and pre-mRNA processing factor 8. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2004;36(9):623–628. doi: 10.1093/abbs/36.9.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kozaric A.K, Przychodzen B, Singh J, Konarska M.M, Clemente M.J, Otrock Z.K, Nakashima M, Hsi E.D, Yoshida K, Shiraishi Y, Chiba K. PRPF8 defects cause missplicing in myeloid malignancies. Leukemia. 2015;29(1):126–136. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Chang Y.C, Jan Y.H, Chan Y.C, Yang Y.F, Su C.Y, Lai T.C, Liu Y.P, Hsiao M. Identification of ALDOA as a new Lung adeonocarcinoma predict gene involve cancer metabolism and tumor metastasis. FASEB J. 2013;27(1_Meetings):58–61. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Migneco G, Menezes D.W, Chiavarina B, Cros R.C, Pavlides S, Pestell R.G, Fatatis A, Flomenberg N, Tsirigos A, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn U.E. Glycolytic cancer associated fibroblasts promote breast cancer tumor growth, without a measurable increase in angiogenesis: Evidence for stromal-epithelial metabolic coupling. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(12):2412–2422. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.12.11989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Li K.K.W, Pang J.C.S, Ching A.K.K, Wong C.K, Kong X, Wang Y, Zhou L, Chen Z, Ng H.K. miR-124 is frequently down-regulated in medulloblastoma and is a negative regulator of SLC16A1. Hum. Pathol. 2009;40(9):1234–1243. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Tripathi A.K, Koringa P.G, Jakhesara S.J, Ahir V.B, Ramani U.V, Bhatt V.D, Sajnani M.R, Patel D.A, Joshi A.J, Shanmuga S.J, Rank D.N. A preliminary sketch of horn cancer transcriptome in Indian zebu cattle. Gene. 2012;493(1):124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Uhlen M, Oksvold P, Fagerberg L, Lundberg E, Jonasson K, Forsberg M, Zwahlen M, Kampf C, Wester K, Hober S, Wernerus H. Towards a knowledge-based human protein atlas. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010;28(12):1248–1250. doi: 10.1038/nbt1210-1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Das S, Samant R.S, Shevde L.A. Hedgehog signaling induced by breast cancer cells promotes osteoclastogenesis and osteolysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286(11):9612–9622. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.174920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Ferraro A, Schepis F, Leone V, Federico A, Borbone E, Pallante P, Berlingieri M.T, Chiappetta G, Monaco M, Palmieri D, Chiariotti L. Tumor suppressor role of the CL2/DRO1/CCDC80 gene in thyroid carcinogenesis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013;98(7):2834–2843. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Hjerpe E, Brage S.E, Carlson J, Stolt M.F, Schedvins K, Johansson H, Shoshan M, Lundqvist E.A. Metabolic markers GAPDH, PKM2, ATP5B and BEC-index in advanced serous ovarian cancer. BMC Clin. Pathol. 2013;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6890-13-30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Li X, Roslan S, Johnstone C.N, Wright J.A, Bracken C.P, Anderson M, Bert A.G, Selth L.A, Anderson R.L, Goodall G.J, Gregory P.A. MiR-200 can repress breast cancer metastasis through ZEB1-independent but moesin-dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2014;33(31):4077–4088. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Singhi A.D, Mathews A.C, Jenkins R.B, Lan F, Fink S.R, Nassar H, Vang R, Fetting J.H, Hicks J, Sukumar S, De Marzo A.M. MYC gene amplification is often acquired in lethal distant breast cancer metastases of unamplified primary tumors. Modern Pathol. 2012;25(3):378–387. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Rokavec M, Öner M.G, Li H, Jackstadt R, Jiang L, Lodygin D, Kaller M, Horst D, Ziegler P.K, Schwitalla S, Slotta-Huspenina J. IL-6R/STAT3/miR-34a feedback loop promotes EMT-mediated colorectal cancer invasion and metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 2014;124(4):1853–1867. doi: 10.1172/JCI73531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Tell R.W, Horvath C.M. Bioinformatic analysis reveals a pattern of STAT3-associated gene expression specific to basal-like breast cancers in human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014;111(35):12787–12792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404881111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kumar V.P, Sehgal P, Thota B, Patil S, Santosh V, Kondaiah P. Insulin like growth factor binding protein 4 promotes GBM progression and regulates key factors involved in EMT and invasion. J. Neuro Oncol. 2014;116(3):455–464. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1324-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Ueno K, Hirata H, Majid S, Tabatabai Z.L, Hinoda Y, Dahiya R. IGFBP-4 activates the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and induces M-CAM expression in human renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;129(10):2360–2369. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wen D, Geng J, Li W, Guo C, Zheng J. A computational bioinformatics analysis of gene expression identifies candidate agents for prostate cancer. Andrologia. 2014;46(6):625–632. doi: 10.1111/and.12127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Sorrells S, Carbonneau S, Harrington E, Chen A.T, Hast B, Milash B, Pyati U, Major M.B, Zhou Y, Zon L.I, Stewart R.A. Ccdc94 protects cells from ionizing radiation by inhibiting the expression of p53. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(8):e1002922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Goicoechea S.M, Bednarski B, Garcia-Mata R, Prentice-Dunn H, Kim H.J, Otey C.A. Palladin contributes to invasive motility in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene. 2009;28(4):587–598. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bhattacharya R, Kwon J, Ali B, Wang E, Patra S, Shridhar V, Mukherjee P. Role of hedgehog signaling in ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008;14(23):7659–7666. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Mourtada J.S, Yang D, Tworowska I, Larson R, Smith D, Tsao N, Opdenaker L, Mourtada F, Woodward W. Detection of canonical hedgehog signaling in breast cancer by 131-iodine-labeled derivatives of the sonic hedgehog protein. BioMed Res. Int. 2012;11:257–258. doi: 10.1155/2012/639562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Kang H.C, Wakabayashi Y, Jen K.Y, Mao J.H, Zoumpourlis V, Del Rosario R, Balmain A. Ptch1 overexpression drives skin carcinogenesis and developmental defects in K14Ptch FVB mice. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2013;133(5):1311–1320. doi: 10.1038/jid.2012.419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhang J, Zheng F, Yu G, Yin Y, Lu Q. miR-196a targets netrin 4 and regulates cell proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;440(4):582–588. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.09.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Wan F, Cheng C, Wang Z, Xiao X, Zeng H, Xing S, Chen X, Wang J, Li S, Zhang Y, Xiang W. SATB1 overexpression regulates the development and progression in bladder cancer through EMT. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 103.Wang Z, Hou J, Lu L, Qi Z, Sun J, Gao W, Meng J, Wang Y, Sun H, Gu H, Xin Y. Small ribosomal protein subunit S7 suppresses ovarian tumorigenesis through regulation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK pathways. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e79117. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yu C, Luo C, Qu B, Khudhair N, Gu X, Zang Y, Wang C, Zhang N, Li Q, Gao X. Molecular network including eIF1AX, RPS7, and 14-3-3γ regulates protein translation and cell proliferation in bovine mammary epithelial cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2014;564:142–155. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2014.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Bachelor M.A, Lu Y, Owens D.M. L-3-Phosphoserine phosphatase (PSPH) regulates cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma proliferation independent of L-serine biosynthesis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2011;63(3):164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2011.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Cheng Y, Liu W, Kim S.T, Sun J, Lu L, Sun J, Zheng S.L, Isaacs W.B, Xu J. Evaluation of PPP2R2A as a prostate cancer susceptibility gene: A comprehensive germline and somatic study. Cancer Genet. 2011;204(7):375–381. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2011.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Liu X, Liu Q, Fan Y, Wang S, Liu X, Zhu L, Liu M, Tang H. Downregulation of PPP2R5E expression by miR-23a suppresses apoptosis to facilitate the growth of gastric cancer cells. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(17):3160–3169. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.05.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Erickson J.W, Cerione R.A. Glutaminase: A hot spot for regulation of cancer cell metabolism? Oncotarget. 2010;1(8):734–740. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Nilsson J.A, Cleveland J.L. Myc pathways provoking cell suicide and cancer. Oncogene. 2003;22(56):9007–9021. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Lu Y, Yi Y, Liu P, Wen W, James M, Wang D, You M. Common human cancer genes discovered by integrated gene-expression analysis. PLoS One. 2007;2(11):e1149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Woeller C.F, Anderson D.D, Szebenyi D.M, Stover P.J. Evidence for small ubiquitin-like modifier-dependent nuclear import of the thymidylate biosynthesis pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282(24):17623–17631. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M702526200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Anderson D.D, Woeller C.F, Stover P.J. Small ubiquitin-like modifier-1 (SUMO-1) modification of thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2007;45(12):1760–1763. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2007.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Fernández-Chacón R, Südhof T.C. Novel SCAMPs lacking NPF repeats: Ubiquitous and synaptic vesicle-specific forms implicate SCAMPs in multiple membrane-trafficking functions. J. Neurosci. 2000;20(21):7941–7950. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-21-07941.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Vogelstein B, Kinzler K.W. Cancer genes and the pathways they control. Nat. Med. 2004;10(8):789–799. doi: 10.1038/nm1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dawany N.B, Dampier W.N, Tozeren A. Large-scale integration of microarray data reveals genes and pathways common to multiple cancer types. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;128(12):2881–2891. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES