Skip to main content
Ultrasound International Open logoLink to Ultrasound International Open
. 2017 Feb;3(1):E26–E33. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-124501

Feasibility and Reproducibility of Two-Dimensional Wall Motion Tracking (WMT) in Fetal Echocardiography

Christian Enzensberger 1,, Friederike Achterberg 1, Jan Degenhardt 1, Aline Wolter 1, Oliver Graupner 2, Johannes Herrmann 3, Roland Axt-Fliedner 1
PMCID: PMC5301653  PMID: 28210715

Abstract

Objective The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of 2-dimensional speckle tracking imaging based on the wall motion tracking (WMT) technique in fetal echocardiography. The secondary objective was to compare left and right ventricular global and segmental longitudinal peak strain values.

Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was performed. Global and segmental longitudinal peak strain values of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle (RV) were assessed prospectively. Based on apical 4-chamber views, cine loops were acquired and digitally stored. Strain analysis was performed offline. Intra- and interobserver variabilities were analyzed.

Results A total of 29 healthy fetuses with an echocardiogram performed between 19 and 37 weeks of gestation were included. Analysis was performed with a temporal resolution of 60 frames per second (fps). For both examiners, in all cases Cronbach’s alpha was>0.7. The interobserver variability showed a strong agreement in 50% of the segments (ICC 0.71–0.90). The global strain values for LV and RV were −16.34 and −14.65%, respectively. Segmental strain analysis revealed a basis to apex gradient with the lowest strain values in basal segments and the highest strain values in apical segments.

Conclusion The assessment of fetal myocardial deformation parameters by 2D WMT is technically feasible with good reproducibility.

Key words: fetal echocardiography, speckle tracking, cardiac function, wall motion tracking

Introduction

Initially fetal echocardiography was used for the identification of structural congenital heart diseases 1 2. Attempts to find improved methods of characterizing and risk stratifying fetuses with cardiovascular compromise, e. g., twin-twin transfusion syndrome, fetal tumors, hydrops fetalis, congenital heart disease, fetomaternal incompatibility, have turned to measures of myocardial function 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10. Quantification of fetal myocardial function is still challenging. To date, it has been assessed by using conventional B-mode, spectral and color Doppler interrogation or M-mode.

With the recent introduction of speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), a promising tool has been found to evaluate global and regional myocardial function in the fetus. This non-Doppler and angle-independent technique allows the quantification of myocardial dynamics and deformation in a chosen myocardial region of interest (ROI) that is based on post-processing 2D image frame-by-frame analysis. Speckles, caused by the interference of energy from randomly distributed scatter echoes in the myocardium, create fine false structures, called “speckle noise”. The speckles move with the tissue and can be followed over sequential frames.

Different ultrasound systems and software solutions have been used for STE mostly to establish normal values in healthy fetal 11 12 and pediatric populations 13 14. A few studies have been focused on special fetal conditions like twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome 7 and intraamniotic infection 15, while other studies concentrated on cardiac anomalies 16 17.

Although there are limitations in the application of this tool to fetuses due to fetal heart size, high heart rates and maternal and fetal movement during acquisition, several studies have been performed and report good reproducibility and feasibility 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26. However, published data in this field is very inconsistent with partially massively differing strain and strain rate data 24 27 28 29. Vendor-dependent speckle tracking imaging is usually based on grayscale B-mode images of endocardial and/or epicardial borders. Wall motion tracking (WMT) technology enables not only endo- and/or epicardial border tracking but tracking of the whole myocardium. As far as we know, this technique has not been investigated yet in fetal echocardiography.

It has been shown that deformation parameters assessed by different ultrasound systems and software packages (e. g., Automated Function Imaging, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI 12 19 26 27; Velocity Vector Imaging (VVI), Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany 30 31 32) are often not comparable 33. Furthermore, the frame rates of the acquired video loops show a huge variation. Archived Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) data with 30 frames per second (fps) was sometimes used for analysis 34 35. Other groups worked with the original frame rate with a frequency from 44 fps up to more than 150 fps 36 37 38 39 40.

The primary objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of 2D speckle tracking imaging based on the WMT technique. The secondary objective of this study was to compare left- and right-ventricular global and segmental longitudinal peak strain values.

Methods

Study population

The study population of this prospective cross-sectional study included fetuses selected from women who were referred for fetal echocardiography to the fetal heart program at the Department of Fetal Diagnosis & Therapy, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, from April 2014 – September 2014. The institutional review board approved this study and participants provided their written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were structural or chromosomal anomalies, twin pregnancies and conditions with a possible effect on fetal hemodynamics, e. g., evidence of fetal infection, maternal diabetes, preeclampsia, preterm labor, endocrinological disorders (e. g., thyroid disease).

All patients underwent a full morphological examination of the fetal heart in order to exclude any congenital heart defects. According to the study protocol, all patients were examined once.

Echocardiography

In every patient a complete transthoracic fetal echocardiography was performed by one experienced operator (C. E.) on a Toshiba Artida system (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Tochigi, Japan). To obtain video loops of a high resolution, zoomed B-mode of an apical 4-chamber view, a 1–5 MHz curved array probe (PVT 375 BT) was used. To achieve high frame rates, the B-mode image depth was reduced and the sector width was narrowed. For storage in raw data format, a concurrent 60 Hz dummy electrocardiogram (ECG) signal (phantom 320, Mueller & Sebastiani Elektronik GmbH, Ottobrunn, Germany) was necessary.

According to a strict protocol for every patient, at least 3 video loops of a 4-chamber view, each with a duration of 2 s, were acquired for the left and the right ventricle. To ensure high image quality, attention was taken with respect to clear delineation of the right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) free wall as well as of the interventricular septum (IVS). The cine loops were digitally stored with the acquisition frame rate.

Wall motion tracking technology

Speckle tracking is an application of pattern matching technology to ultrasound cine data. A template image is created using a local myocardial region in the starting frame of the image data. In the next frame an algorithm searches for the local speckle pattern that most closely matches the template. A movement vector is then created using the location of the template and the matching pattern in the subsequent frame. Multiple templates are used to observe movement of the entire myocardium. The process is then repeated by creating new templates and observing their movement in the subsequent frames until the entire cardiac cycle has been assessed. This method does not make use of Doppler information, so there is no Doppler angle dependency 41.

Strain analysis

The offline analysis was performed by 2 operators on a workstation equipped with the TestDriver software (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Japan). Apical 4-chamber views of good quality 2D B-mode cine loops were chosen, either displaying the right (right free wall and IVS) or the left (left free wall and IVS) ventricle. The frame rate for analysis was 60 fps according to DICOM standard. Without the possibility of acquiring a fetal ECG, one fetal heart cycle was identified for analysis by the movement of the atrioventricular (AV) valve. End-diastole was defined by complete closure of the AV valves. The time cursor was set firstly with closure of the AV valves and secondly just before the next AV valve closure. The fetal heart rate was calculated on the basis of a heart cycle duration. Based on heart rate and fps the frames per cycle (fpc) were assessed.

Strain measurements of the left and right ventricle were taken either from the same clip or from another clip if the sector width had limited the display window to 1 ventricle only. In end-diastole, endocardial markers were set along the endocardium. Beginning either just above the lateral or septal AV valve annulus, several markers were set along the endocardium in a counterclockwise direction up to the apex and back to the septal or lateral AV valve annulus. Automatically the endocardial border of a ventricle was traced (inner line) and an outer line parallel to the inner line delimitates the epicardium (Fig. 1, left). The myocardial wall was detected with the possibility of manual adjustment of the myocardial thickness in the case of mismatching. After selection of the markers and myocardial tracing, the 2D WMT analysis of all patterns inside the user-defined region of interest (ROI) was performed through the stored fetal cardiac cycle. Accuracy of tracking was subjectively verified. Cases in which satisfactory tracking could not be obtained after several attempts were classified as inadequate and excluded from data analysis.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(Left) traced myocardial wall of the LV and interventricular septum with 6 segments (BL (basal lateral), ML (middle lateral), AL (apical lateral), AS (apical septal), MS (middle septal), BS (basal septal)). (Right) longitudinal strain (%) curves of the 6 segments and global strain (%) for one fetal heart cycle.

According to the software setup, the LV and RV myocardium were automatically divided into 6 segments, 2 basal, 2 middle and 2 apical ones, in each ventricle with 3 lateral free wall and 3 septal segments. The LV and RV each contained the lateral free wall and the IVS.

Based on changes in speckle location in the data set, the longitudinal strain for each segment was calculated. The Lagrangian strain, which is the difference in the end-diastolic and end-systolic length of the inner ventricular contour, is assessed with WMT technology. The results were displayed graphically as well as in numeric format for all segmental data (Fig. 1, right).

Statistical analysis

To carry out comparisons between groups, either a general regression model or a random intercept model was used. The test was performed using the SPSS procedure MIXED (random intercept and random slopes model). Myocardial function parameters with independent data were analyzed with a general linear regression model (ANCOVA). If the analysis showed a dependency of data, the parameters were analyzed with the SPSS procedure MIXED (random intercept model). For both the linear regression model and the random intercept model, gestational age was considered as a covariate. In addition, a linear regression analysis was performed in order to investigate a possible influence of gestational age studied on mean global strain values of both ventricles.

The intraobserver and interobserver variability of the echocardiographic measurements were assessed in a subset of 10 echocardiograms from randomly selected patients at various times. 2 operators (C.E. and F.A.) analyzed the same images independently. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2-way-random, absolute agreement, single rater) was used for interobserver variability. The analysis of intraobserver variability was performed with Cronbach’s alpha. Values of 0.7–0.8 for the intraclass correlation coefficient or Cronbach’s alpha indicate good agreement and values>0.8 strong agreement between measurements.

All values were considered significantly different at p<0.05.

Results

33 fetuses were included in the study. Every patient was examined once in pregnancy. Speckle tracking analysis could be performed in 29 patients (88%). 4 patients, in which speckle tracking measurements could not be successfully obtained, were excluded from data analysis. The mean gestational age was 26.5±4.9 weeks (range 18.3–36.6 weeks), the mean fpc was 26 (range 23 – 30 fpc). The global strain values for LV and RV were −16.34% and −14.65%, respectively (Table 1). The difference between both ventricles was statistically significant (p<0.001). The highest mean segmental strain values were found in the apical segment of the lateral free wall of the left and right ventricle, whereas the basal segments presented with the lowest values. Within the ventricular septum of both ventricles, higher mean segmental strain values were detected at the apex compared to the basal part of the ventricular septum. Segmental strain analysis revealed a basis to apex gradient with the lowest strain values in the basal and the highest strain values in the apical segments.

Table 1 Mean segmental and global strain values and the 95% confidence interval for left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) free wall and the interventricular septum, analyzed either from the LV or the RV.

Segment Strain (%) 95% CI
LV free wall Basal −14.79 −15.93 –(−13.66)
Middle −16.12 −17.26 –(−14.99)
Apical −23.53 −24.67 –(−22.40)
RV free wall Basal −13.22 −14.49 –(−11.96)
Middle −15.10 −16.37 –(−13.84)
Apical −19.51 −20.78 –(−18.25)
Septum LV Basal −12.06 −13.19 –(−10.93)
Middle −14.73 −15.86 –(−13.60)
Apical −23.10 −24.23 –(−21.97)
Septum RV Basal −12.85 −13.79 –(−11.91)
Middle −13.97 −14.91 –(−13.03)
Apical −19.04 −19.97 –(−18.10)
Global strain LV Global −16.34 −16.94 –(−15.75)
Global strain RV Global −14.65 −15.19 –(−14.12)

Table 2 displays the results of a comparison of the basal, middle and apical strain values among each other. Significant differences were depicted within all segments of LV, RV and IVS (p<0.05). Linear regression analysis revealed no significant influence of the gestational age studied on mean global strain values of both ventricles (p=0.44 for LV, p=0.44 for RV).

Table 2 Comparison of basal, middle and apical strain values among each other for left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) free wall and the interventricular septum, analyzed either from the LV or the RV.

Segments Strain (%) ∆ mean values p-value
LV Basal vs. middle −14.79 vs. −16.12 −1.33 0.023
Basal vs. apical −14.79 vs. −23.53 −8.74 0.000
Middle vs. apical −16.12 vs. −23.53 −7.41 0.000
RV Basal vs. middle −13.22 vs. −15.10 −1.88 0.005
Basal vs. apical −13.22 vs. −19.51 −6.29 0.000
Middle vs. apical −15.10 vs. −19.51 −4.41 0.000
Septum LV Basal vs. middle −12.06 vs. −14.73 −2.67 0.000
Basal vs. apical −12.06 vs. −23.10 −11.04 0.000
Middle vs. apical −14.73 vs. −23.10 −8.37 0.000
Septum RV Basal vs. middle −12.85 vs. −13.97 −1.13 0.047
Basal vs. apical −12.85 vs. −19.04 −6.19 0.000
Middle vs. apical −13.97 vs. −19.04 −5.06 0.000

Within 10 fetuses of the whole study population, the intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. For both examiners, in all cases Cronbach’s alpha was >0.7 (Table 3). The interobserver variability showed a strong agreement in 50% of the segments (ICC 0.71–0.90 in 6/12 segments). There was also a strong agreement of global RV and LV peak strain values (Table 4).

Table 3 Analysis of intraobserver variability with Cronbach’s alpha.

Segments Examiner 1 Examiner 2
Right ventricle (RV)
Basal free wall 0.955 0.943
Middle free wall 0.832 0.962
Apical free wall 0.949 0.938
Basal septal 0.924 0.993
Middle septal 0.754 0.984
Apical septal 0.887 0.944
Global RV 0.956 0.972
Left ventricle (LV)
Basal free wall 0.718 0.879
Middle free wall 0.921 0.974
Apical free wall 0.886 0.968
Basal septal 0.912 0.885
Middle septal 0.957 0.932
Apical septal 0.788 0.954
Global LV 0.966 0.982

Table 4 Analysis of interobserver variability with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Segments ICC
Right ventricle (RV)
Basal free wall 0.886
Middle free wall 0.703
Apical free wall 0.905
Basal septal 0.886
Middle septal 0.692
Apical septal 0.774
Global RV 0.892
Left ventricle (LV)
Basal free wall 0.464
Middle free wall 0.700
Apical free wall 0.479
Basal septal 0.871
Middle septal 0.946
Apical septal 0.352
Global RV 0.890

Discussion

First, this study shows good reproducibility and feasibility of longitudinal strain analysis with high intra- and interobserver correlations in fetal echocardiography. The success rate of 88% that we achieved in our speckle tracking measurements is comparable to already published data 20 22.

In recent years many different techniques, e. g., tissue Doppler imaging (TDI), have been used to investigate fetal myocardial function. By the use of TDI, it was possible to assess annular or myocardial velocities online as well as to assess strain, strain rate and cardiac time intervals offline by post-processing analysis 9 10 42. One of the major criticisms of TDI has been the directional bias of the technology 43 44 45 46 47.

With 2D STE a relatively angle-independent technique was introduced with the possibility of determining myocardial motion (translation and rotation) and deformation indices: myocardial thickening and thinning, cardiac torsion 48 49 50 including apical twisting 51, radial motion and local thickening. Validation of 2D STE based on grayscale B-mode images of endocardial and epicardial borders with sonomicrometry and magnetic resonance imaging in adult and pediatric populations revealed 2D STE to be a reliable method to assess myocardial function 18 52 53. Langeland et al. could assess a good agreement between ultrasound and sonomicrometry with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.80 for longitudinal components 54. However, not only endo- and epicardial border tracking has been validated. Ishizu et al. validated LV transmural strain measured by speckle tracking imaging against sonomicrometry and reported good agreement between both techniques 55.

Our results are comparable with already published data, using different technologies, reporting good reproducibility for the application of speckle tracking imaging in the fetus. For their second trimester ultrasound-derived reference values, Kapusta et al. revealed good or excellent ICCs for intra- and interobserver variance in most cases 26. Ta-Shma et al., who analyzed segmental and global fetal myocardial function by automatic functional imaging, achieved an interobserver and intraobserver variability that showed only a small bias among the observers with narrow 95% confidence intervals 19. Longitudinal deformation measurement seems to be more reproducible than others, e. g., radial strain. Koopman et al. compared different speckle tracking and color Doppler techniques to measure global and regional myocardial deformation in children. For LV longitudinal strain measurements, they revealed the highest reproducibility, smallest bias, and most narrow limits of agreement for the different techniques 33.

Second, our study demonstrates a significant gradient of deformation from base to apex for longitudinal strain in both ventricles. All 3 segments (basal, middle and apical) of both lateral free wall and IVS were significantly different from each other. The apical segments of LV and RV free wall as well as of the IVS, independent of acquisition from left or right, showed significantly higher strain values. Previously published data about segmental strain differences is inconsistent. Several authors reported an apex to base gradient with significantly greater strain values either in basal segments of both ventricles 37 or in the RV only 26 29 38. Other groups did not reveal significant differences between the segments 32. Our findings are in agreement with those of Marcus et al. 56. They established reference values for myocardial 2D strain echocardiography in a healthy pediatric and young adult cohort. Not only in their youngest patient group (<1 year) but also in the other groups they revealed the highest longitudinal peak systolic strain values in the apical segments. The results are also comparable to those of Bussadori et al., who also demonstrated a base to apex gradient in their pediatric and adult population 57. In their fetal second and third trimester population, Kim et al. also demonstrated greater strain values in the LV and the IVS 38. Depending on different imaging techniques, variable results have been published according to left ventricular strain. In tagged MRI and 2D STE studies, higher apical than basal or middle segmental strain values have been reported, whereas tissue Doppler studies did not show a significant variation from base to apex 58 59 60 61. This evidence was independent of the ultrasound scanner and software packages. Beside the technical impact of 2D STE using WMT technology, it might be speculated that there is a physiologic substrate in which the base-to-apex gradient is the result of the torsional mechanism of the left ventricular system and the direction of contraction of the descending fibers in the internal loop of the highly structured 3-dimensional (3D) network of myocardial cells 56. The recent introduction of 3D STE might offer more accurate and reproducible tracking to confirm these findings. Like in 2D STE, the 3D technique was developed for strain measurement in the adult heart. Enzensberger et al. presented preliminary results of their first application of 3D WMT in fetal echocardiography. Unfortunately, due to the lack of high-frequency transducers and algorithms designed especially for fetal echocardiography, this is currently only possible in individual fetuses 62.

The 3-dimensional architecture of the myocardium and its complex motion during the cardiac cycle lead to difficulties in tracking within a 2D plane because of the speckles moving out of the 2D plane into the next frame. Consequently, only part of the real myocardial motion can be detected up to impossible tracking 45 63. Therefore, different authors report the requirement of high frame rates to ensure adequate tracking. D’hooge recommends>80 frames per second (fps) in healthy adult hearts with a normal heart rate for an adequate assessment of motion and deformation parameters 64. In fetal 2D STE low frame rates coupled with high heart rates have been a major problem. Many studies used frame rates of 30 fps for deformation analysis 20 21 24 30 65. It could be demonstrated that higher frame rates revealed both an increased success rate for attaining adequate tracking and analysis and an increase in absolute strain and strain rate parameters 22. In the present study all echocardiographic images were stored automatically at a frame rate of 60 Hz and the tracking quality was visually acceptable. The frame rate per heart cycle (fpc) seems to be more important than the absolute frame rate. As Roesner et al. could demonstrate in simulated data, accurate strain estimates could be achieved at>30 fpc for longitudinal and circumferential strains 66. Analysis of synthetic imaging data revealed that an insufficient fpc leads to systematic underestimation of strain values. Although the global peak systolic longitudinal strain acquired with 15–25 fpc in patient, which is below our mean fpc, data was not significantly different from a reference group acquired with 46–65 fpc 66.

Our global and segmental peak systolic strain values assessed by WMT technology were lower compared to other published data. One reason can be a higher frame rate used by acquisition compared to the 60 Hz we used in our study. Roesner et al. revealed a 2-fold higher longitudinal strain in the endocardium compared with an epicardial ROI 66. Kim et al., who also stored their images at 60 Hz, achieved slightly higher strain values 38. Other authors assessed their strain analysis at 30 Hz, showing LV strain values which are comparable to our data 24 34 35. To avoid artifacts due to fetal movement or change of cardiac cycle, we used only one cardiac cycle for analysis instead of averaging over multiple cycles. This might also be a reason for the lower peak systolic strain values.

In the present study, we revealed statistically significant differences in global longitudinal peak systolic strain between LV and RV, with higher strain values in LV. This is in contrast to some previously published data. While some authors report higher strain values in the RV 25 38, other authors did not find any difference among both ventricles 26 28. The different techniques of acquisition might be responsible for this inconsistency in the published data.

For our study population regression analysis revealed stable RV and LV global peak strain values throughout pregnancy. These results are similar to already published data assessed with VVI 21 24 30 38. Another recent study using the automated function imaging technique also demonstrated stable global strain values 19. Other authors reported a statistically significant decrease in the mean global longitudinal strain of the RV, while the global strain of the LV remained constant 25 27. As many studies have already shown, cardiac growth mainly occurs by myocyte enlargement rather than its proliferation in mid and late gestation 67 68. Therefore, stable systolic strain values in the course of pregnancy might be explained by the fact that the number of myocytes per ventricular wall volume remains unchanged with advancing gestational age 38.

Our study was limited by the small number of patients.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the feasibility of the application of 2D STE using the WMT technology in fetal echocardiography. The aim of this study was not to establish reference values.

Originally developed for strain measurement in the adult heart, further development of STE is necessary to improve its application in fetal echocardiography and to make data more comparable between different ultrasound scanners and software packages. A first step forward was made by the cooperation of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and a task force of interested vendors to reduce the inter-vendor variability of strain measurement by initiating standardized deformation imaging. A first consensus paper was recently published 69.

With further progress in research and technical development, STE might be a helpful tool in the clinical management of pathologies with the focus on strain analysis like intrauterine growth restriction or congenital heart diseases.

Acknowledgments

Technical support was provided by Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara-Shi, Tochigi, Japan.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest No conflict of interest has been declared by the author(s).

References

  • 1.Sahn D J, Lange L W, Allen H D. et al. Quantitative real-time cross-sectional echocardiography in the developing normal human fetus and newborn. Circulation. 1980;62:588–597. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.62.3.588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allan L D, Joseph M C, Boyd E G. et al. M-mode echocardiography in the developing human fetus. Br Heart J. 1982;47:573–583. doi: 10.1136/hrt.47.6.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sahn D, Kisslo J. Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs: ultrasonic imaging of the heart: report of the Ultrasonography Task Force. Arch Intern Med. 1991;151:1288–1294. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deprest J A, Flake A W, Gratacos E. et al. The making of fetal surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:653–667. doi: 10.1002/pd.2571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Comas M, Crispi F, Cruz-Martinez R. et al. Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler vs conventional echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:450–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mäkikallio K, Räsänen J, Mäkikallio T. et al. Human fetal cardiovascular profile score and neonatal outcome in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31:48–54. doi: 10.1002/uog.5210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Van Mieghem T, Klaritsch P, Doné E. et al. Assessment of fetal cardiac function before and after therapy for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:400 e1–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mäkikallio K, McElhinney D B, Levine J C. et al. Fetal aortic valve stenosis and the evolution of hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Patient selection for fetal intervention. Circulation. 2006;113:1401–1405. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.588194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Axt-Fliedner R, Graupner O, Degenhardt J. et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function in the fetus with hypoplastic left heart using tissue Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:670–677. doi: 10.1002/uog.14736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Graupner O, Enzensberger C, Wieg L. et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function in fetal hypoplastic left heartsyndrome by colour tissue Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:732–738. doi: 10.1002/uog.14940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Di Salvo G, Russo M G, Paladini D. et al. Quantification of regional left and rightventricular longitudinal function in 75 normal fetuses using ultrasound-based strain rate and strain imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1159–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Di Salvo G, Russo M G, Paladini D. et al. Two-dimensional strain to assess regional left and right ventricular longitudinal function in 100 normal foetuses. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2008;9:754–756. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jen134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pena J L, da Silva M G, Faria S C. et al. Quantification of regional left and right ventricular deformation indices in healthy neonates by using strain rate and strain imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lorch S M, Ludomirsky A, Singh G K. Maturational and growth-related changes inleft ventricular longitudinal strain and strain rate measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in healthy pediatric population. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:1207–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Di Naro E, Cromi A, Ghezzi F. et al. Myocardialdysfunction in fetuses exposed to intraamniotic infection: new insights fromtissue Doppler and strain imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:4590–e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Germanakis I, Matsui H, Gardiner H M. Myocardial strain abnormalities in fetal congenital heart disease assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:123–130. doi: 10.1159/000334413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barker PC A, Houle H, Li J S. et al. Global longitudinal cardiac strain and strain rate for assessment of fetal cardiac function: Novel experience with velocity vector imaging. Echocardiography. 2009;26:28–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Amundsen B H, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T. et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: Validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:789–793. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ta-Shma A, Perles Z, Gavri S. et al. Analysis of segmental and global function of the fetal heart using novel automatic functional imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:146–150. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Younoszai A K, Saudek D E, Emery S P. et al. Evaluation of myocardial mechanics in the fetus by velocity vector imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008:470–474. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pu D R, Zhou Q C, Zhang M. et al. Assessment of regional right ventricular longitudinal functions in fetus using velocity vector imaging technology. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:1057–1063. doi: 10.1002/pd.2611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Matsui H, Germanakis I, Kulinskaya E. et al. Temporal and spatial performance of vector velocity imaging in the human fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:150–157. doi: 10.1002/uog.8815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Onugoren O, Gottschalk E, Dudenhausen J W. et al. Assessment of long-axis ventricular function in the fetal heart with a tissue-tracking algorithm. J Perinat Med. 2012;40:297–305. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ishii T, McElhinney D B, Harrild D M. et al. Circumferential and longitudinal ventricular strain in the normal human fetus. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:105–111. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Willruth A M, Geipel A K, Berg C T. et al. Comparison of global and regional right and left ventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain, strain rate and velocity in healthy fetuses using a novel feature tracking technique. J Perinat Med. 2011;39:549–556. doi: 10.1515/jpm.2011.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kapusta L, Mainzer G, Weiner Z. et al. Second trimester ultrasound: Reference values for two-dimensional speckle tracking-derived longitudinal strain, strain rate and time to peak deformation of the fetal heart. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:1333–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kapusta L, Mainzer G, Weiner Z. et al. Changes in fetal left and right ventricular strain mechanics during normal pregnancy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Barker PC A, Houle H, Li J S. et al. Global longitudinal cardiac strain and strain rate for assessment of fetal cardiac function: Novel experience with velocity vector imaging. Echocardiography. 2009;26:28–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Willruth A M, Geipel A K, Fimmers R. et al. Assessment of right ventricular global and regional longitudinal peak systolic strain, strain rate and velocity in healthy fetuses and impact of gestational age using a novel speckle/feature-tracking based algorithm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:143–149. doi: 10.1002/uog.7719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peng Q H, Zhou Q C, Zeng S. et al. Evaluation of regional left ventricular longitudinal function in 151 normal fetuses using velocity vector imaging. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:1149–1155. doi: 10.1002/pd.2386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Van Mieghem T, Giusca S, DeKoninck P. et al. Prospective assessment of fetal cardiac function with speckle tracking in healthy fetuses and recipient fetuses of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:301–308. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Willruth A M, Geipel A, Berg C. et al. Assessment of left ventricular global and regional longitudinal peak systolic strain, strain rate and velocity with feature tracking in healthy fetuses. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:E293–E298. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Koopman L P, Slorach C, Hui W. et al. Comparison between different speckle tracking and color tissue doppler techniques to measure global and regional myocardial deformation in children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:919–928. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brooks P A, Khoo N S, Mackie A S. et al. Right ventricular function in fetal hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25:1068–1074. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brooks P A, Khoo N S, Hornberger L K. Systolic and diastolic function of the fetal single left ventricle. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:972–977. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Crispi F, Sepulveda-Swatson E, Cruz-Lemini M. et al. Feasibility and reproducibility of a standard protocol for 2D speckle tracking and tissue doppler-based strain and strain rate analysis of the fetal heart. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:96–108. doi: 10.1159/000337329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Schubert U, Müller M, Norman M. et al. Transition from fetal to neonatal life: Changes in cardiac function assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:803–808. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim S-H, Miyakoshi K, Kadohira I. et al. Comparison of the right and left ventricular performance during the fetal development using velocity vector imaging. Early Hum Dev. 2013;89:675–681. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2013.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Persico N, Fabietti I, Baffero G M. et al. Fetal right ventricular contraction and relaxation times at 11-13 weeks’ gestation on speckle tracking imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:284–290. doi: 10.1002/uog.13192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.DeKoninck P, D’hooge J, Van Mieghem T. et al. Speckle tracking echocardiography in fetuses diagnosed with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:1262–1267. doi: 10.1002/pd.4461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kawagishi T. Speckle tracking for assessment of cardiac motion and dyssynchrony. Echocardiography. 2008;25:1167–1171. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Fontana A, Zambon A, Cesana F. et al. Tissue Doppler, triplane echocardiography, and speckle tracking echocardiography: different ways of measuring longitudinal myocardial velocity and deformation parameters. A comparative clinical study. Echocardiography. 2012;29:428–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01618.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Thomas G. Tissue Doppler echocardiography - a case of right tool, wrong use. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2004;2:12. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-2-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Marwick T H. Measurement of strain and strain rate by echocardiography: Ready for prime time? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1313–1327. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.11.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Forsey J, Friedberg M K, Mertens L. Speckle tracking echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Echocardiography. 2013;30:447–459. doi: 10.1111/echo.12131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Biswas M, Sudhakar S, Nanda N C. et al. Two- and three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: clinical applications and future directions. Echocardiography. 2013;30:88–105. doi: 10.1111/echo.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Storaa C, Åberg P, Lind B. et al. Effect of Angular Error on Tissue Doppler Velocities and Strain. Echocardiography. 2003;20:581–587. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8175.2003.01135.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kim H K, Sohn D W, Lee S E. et al. Assessment of Left Ventricular Rotation and Torsion with Two-dimensional Speckle Tracking Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Notomi Y, Lysyansky P, Setser R M. et al. Measurement of ventricular torsion by two-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:2034–2041. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Takeuchi M, Nishikage T, Nakai H. et al. The assessment of left ventricular twist in anterior wall myocardial infarction using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2006.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Ashraf M, Li X K, Young M T. et al. Delineation of cardiac twist by a sonographically based 2-dimensional strain analysis method: an in vitro validation study. J Ultrasound Med. 2006;25:1193–1198. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.9.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Korinek J, Wang J, Sengupta P P. et al. Two-dimensional strain – A Doppler-independent ultrasound method for quantitation of regional deformation: Validation in vitro and in vivo. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:1247–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Singh G K, Cupps B, Pasque M. et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of strain by speckle tracking in pediatric subjects with normal heart and single ventricular physiology: A two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging correlative Study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:1143–1152. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Langeland S, D'hooge J, Wouters P F. et al. Experimental validation of a new ultrasound method for the simultaneousassessment of radial and longitudinal myocardial deformation independent ofinsonation angle. Circulation. 2005;112:2157–2162. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.554006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ishizu T, Seo Y, Enomoto Y. et al. Experimental validation of left ventricular transmural strain gradient with echocardiographic two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2010;11:377–385. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jep221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Marcus K A, Mavinkurve-Groothuis AM C, Barends M. et al. Reference values for myocardial two-dimensional strain echocardiography in a healthy pediatric and young adult cohort. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:625–636. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bussadori C, Moreo A, Di Donato M. et al. A new 2D-based method for myocardial velocity strain and strain rate quantification in a normal adult and paediatric population: assessment of reference values. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-7-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Marwick T H, Leano R L, Brown J. et al. Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography: definition of normal range. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bogaert J, Rademakers F E. Regional nonuniformity of normal adult human left ventricle. Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol. 2001;280:H610–H620. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.2.H610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Leitman M, Lysiansky M, Lysyansky P. et al. Circumferential and longitudinal strain in 3 myocardial layers in normal subjects and in patients with regional left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23:64–70. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Saito K, Okura H, Watanabe N. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular strain using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal adults: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:1025–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.05.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Enzensberger C, Degenhardt J, Tenzer A. et al. First Experience with three-dimensional speckle tracking (3D wall motion tracking) in fetal echocardiography. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35:566–572. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.De Isla L P, Balcones D V, Fernández-Golfín C. et al. Three-dimensional-wall motion tracking: A new and faster tool for myocardial strain assessment: comparison with two-dimensional-wall motion Tracking. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:325–330. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.D’Hooge J, Bijnens B, Jamal F. et al. High frame rate myocardial integrated backscatter. does this change our understanding of this acoustic parameter? Eur J Echocardiogr. 2000;1:32–41. doi: 10.1053/euje.2000.0004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rychik J, Zeng S, Bebbington M. et al. Speckle tracking-derived myocardial tissue deformation imaging in twin-twin transfusion syndrome: Differences in strain and strain rate between donor and recipient twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:131–137. doi: 10.1159/000335403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rösner A, Barbosa D, Aarsæther E. et al. The influence of frame rate on two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain measurements: a study on silico-simulated models and images recorded in patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1137–1147. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Smolich J J, Walker A M, Campbell G R. et al. Left and right ventricular myocardial morphometry in fetal, neonatal, and adult sheep. Am J Physiol. 1989;257(1 Pt 2):H1–H9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1989.257.1.H1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jonker S S, Zhang L, Louey S. et al. Myocyte enlargement, differentiation, and proliferation kinetics in the fetal sheep heart. J Appl Physiol. 2007;102:1130–1142. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00937.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Voigt J U, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P. et al. Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:1–11. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Ultrasound International Open are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES