Erratum
The original version of this manuscript [1] unfortunately contained a mistake. Two species labels mentioned throughout the main body and supplementary files were swapped. The samples have since been re-verified by Sanger sequencing from stock DNA (not shown).
Any occurrences of these species names have been corrected in the main text as shown below. In addition, a corrected version of Table 1 is provided below with the updated versions of the figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 and the supplementary files affected.
Page 1. Abstract should read as follows
Proposed text
In contrast, we obtained a very well-supported phylogeny from 2301 nuclear genes without evidence of positive Darwinian selection both from the majority of most-likely gene trees and the concatenated fourfold degenerate sites: ((P. depressus, (M. nudus, M. franciscanus), (H. pulcherrimus, (S. purpuratus, (S. intermedius , (S. pallidus, (S. droebachiensis, S. fragilis)). This phylogeny was consistent with a single invasion of deep-water environments and holarctic expansion by Strongylocentrotus.
Page 4. Results should read as follows
The BI 50% majority-rule consensus phylogram of the stationary tree inferred from fourfold degenerate sites of nuclear genes without selection (‘N4Ds tree’) had complete (BI PP = 1, BSML = BSMP = 100) or very strong support from all three methods at all nodes with the N4N and N4A datasets except at the divergence of S. intermedius (BSMP = 74 and BSMP = 69, respectively).
Page 4. Results should read as
Indeed, the tree obtained from the N4S data produced a similar topography except S. purpuratus and S. intermedius branching locations were swapped, with S. intermedius the earlier branching of the two with low support for the node (not shown).
Page 6. Results should read as
We also found very strong support for a monophyletic clade of S. fragilis, S. droebachiensis and S. pallidus across our analysis of concatenated datasets. However, MA and M4 datasets produced S. pallidus sister to S. droebachiensis, but without strong support. In contrast, the N4A, N4S and N4N concatenated datasets found very strong support S. fragilis as sister to S. pallidus.
Page 6. Results should read as
We found contradictory topologies for the relative positions of S. intermedius and S. purpuratus among mitochondrial genes trees.
Page 6. Results should read as
The locations of S. purpuratus and S. intermedius were discordant between the MP method and BI and ML methods in the MA and M4 datasets. BI and ML trees had these two species sister to S. fragilis, S. pallidus and S. droebachiensis (Figure 3), whereas the MP method has S. purpuratus branching earliest, then S. intermedius and then the S. fragilis, S. pallidus and S. droebachiensis observed with the nuclear concatenated datasets (not shown). The monophyly of a S. fragilis, S. pallidus and S. droebachiensis clade was recovered in both MA and M4, but we found conflicting support for a sister relationship between S. pallidus and S. droebachiensis versus S. pallidus and S. fragilis (Figure 3).
Page 6. Results should read as
When we included the 12S sequences of Lee (2003) with our 12S data, our alignment and ML method produced a congruent tree (Additional file 5: Figure S5) and H. pulcherrimus, S. intermedius , and S. nudus individuals resolved as sister taxa.
Table 1 should also read as follows
S. intermedius (A. Agassiz) | WP | 0-225 | 15,748 |
S. fragilis (Jackson) | EP | 0-1150 | 15,718 |
Additional files
Footnotes
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-88.
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-88.
References
- 1.Kober and Bernardi. Phylogenomics of strongylocentrotid sea urchins. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:88 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/88 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]