Cognitive health is recognized as a major factor in ensuring quality of life and optimal independence across the life span, yet it is inconsistently a priority of public health initiatives. Per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “a healthy brain is one that can perform all the mental processes that are collectively known as cognition, including the ability to learn new things, intuition, judgment, language and remembering.”1 Impaired cognition is associated with considerable socioeconomic burden, adding to the public health imperative.
A recent initiative by New York State’s Office of Mental Health, with its academic partner Columbia University, set a precedent for a state-level implementation of programs to address cognitive health in people with psychiatric illnesses. This is the first known statewide program in the United States to address the cognitive impairments associated with psychiatric disorders.
COGNITIVE HEALTH ACROSS THE LIFE SPAN
Most cognitive health initiatives address aging populations. It is generally appreciated that the dementias, seen mainly in aging populations, cause significant morbidity and mortality, socioeconomic costs, and caregiver burden. Consequently, public health initiatives for this population are largely concerned with prevention and stabilization.2 Both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Institute on Aging support development of public messages and programs to promote cognitive health in older adults.
Addressing cognitive health is not limited to aging populations. For children and young adults, cognitive health is mostly addressed and managed in schools, although the role of environmental toxins and sports-related brain injuries have garnered considerable attention in medical and public health forums. The National Institutes of Health and National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) support research to accelerate discoveries and reduce the burden of cognitive impairment caused by nervous system and psychiatric disorders across the life span.
Cognitive deficits are prominent in most serious mental illnesses, and such deficits are often persistent even as other symptoms fluctuate. In 2014, 4.2% of US citizens, aged 18 years and older, had serious mental illnesses, whereas about 20% of children have at some point had a seriously debilitating mental disorder.3 Deficits are evident on a variety of neurocognitive measures, including attention, processing speed, working memory, verbal learning, and problem solving, on the order of 0.5 to 2 SD below the normative mean.4 Cognitive deficits have significant implications for psychosocial functioning, contribute to the profound psychosocial disability that people with serious mental illnesses often experience, and add significantly to illness burden.4 A recent NIMH task force has underscored the great significance placed on systematic efforts to improve cognition from early prodromal stages to full-blown illness.5 Enhancing cognition and addressing cognitive deficits are public health concerns.
BARRIERS TO ADDRESSING COGNITIVE HEALTH
Public health initiatives that address cognitive symptoms associated with psychiatric illness are rare in the United States for the following reasons:
Cognitive health is not well addressed in the behavioral health professional programs.
A misperception exists among clinicians and the lay public that cognition is not malleable.
The relation between cognition and functional outcome is poorly understood.
Funding is inadequate to support cognitive interventions.
Lack of precedent can in and of itself be a barrier.
In psychiatry, cognitive symptoms are often viewed as an indication of nonpsychiatric disorders. A recent NIMH task force called for recognition that cognition is in fact a symptom of psychiatric disorders, and impaired cognition explains why patients do not transition from primary symptom relief to recovery.5
A MODEL COGNITIVE HEALTH PROGRAM
The New York State Office of Mental Health cognitive health initiative has shown that it is possible to implement a service to address cognition associated with psychiatric conditions, to operationalize cognitive health efforts in a large system of care, and to draw attention to the fact that addressing cognitive deficits means promoting recovery. The Office of Mental Health serves more than 700 000 people annually in New York, a state of 19.5 million people, and operates emergency, inpatient, outpatient, forensic, crisis, and residential services for adults and children, as well as two research institutes. As the largest state mental health system in the United States, it is relatively unique in breadth of geographic regions and cultural and linguistic groups served. In July 2014, the Office of Mental Health partnered with Columbia University to set up a Cognitive Health Service that could be implemented throughout the system of care. This involved setting up a mechanism to train staff and implement and supervise clinical services that address cognitive health.
Thinking Well is an Office of Mental Health campaign intended to focus on the need for cognitive health to make a good recovery. This initiative includes education about cognitive health and wide-scale enhancements for the delivery of treatments that promote optimal cognitive health. Components of Thinking Well include literature and informational sheets for providers, patients, and families (for example see: https://www.omh.ny.gov/omhweb/cogdys_manual/CogDysHndbk.pdf); a Web site for Office of Mental Health providers; and statewide archived grand rounds, Web-based free lectures, and clinician focus groups to inform Office of Mental Health staff about implementation efforts. Staff training was further supplemented with lectures and workshops at Columbia University’s sponsored annual Cognitive Remediation in Psychiatry conference and Internet-based learning at http://www.teachrecovery.com, a Web site built to train professionals about treatments for cognitive disorders.
Cognitive Remediation to Promote Recovery (CR2PR) is the first implemented treatment arm of this Office of Mental Health cognitive health initiative, and it was developed to serve patients identified as having cognitive impairments that hamper recovery goal attainment. Cognitive remediation is a behaviorally based training intervention with moderate effect sizes that aims to decrease cognitive deficits so that everyday functioning will improve.4 Cognitive remediation garnered international attention as a treatment that harnesses the potential for neuroplasticity that exists even when psychiatric illness affects brain functioning.5 Pharmacological interventions remain crucial as treatments for the symptoms of psychosis and affective dysregulation, but they do not treat difficulties in cognition.6 Furthermore, no medication is indicated to specifically address cognitive impairments in patients with serious mental illnesses.
Since 2015, CR2PR has been implemented at 16 adult outpatient New York State–operated clinics across 13 psychiatric centers. These clinics serve patients with serious mental illnesses aged 18 to 65 years, monolingual and bilingual, in rural and urban settings. It took an average of 6 months to start a program at any given site with the use of Web-based, face-to-face, and manualized implementation strategies. Continuous quality improvement strategies are used to maintain the fidelity and efficacy of these programs.
The Office of Mental Health initiative recognizes that cognitive remediation’s effect on functional outcome is best realized when the treatment is tied to overall recovery goals7; therefore, maximizing wellness, addressing cognitive deficits, and achieving patient-centered recovery goals are the three pillars of CR2PR. This is the first known statewide program in the United States to address cognitive health in people with serious mental illnesses.
A NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN
Although state efforts are important, a national focus to systematically and comprehensively improve the way cognitive health is addressed is necessary. Currently, the public receives mixed messages about what cognitive health is,2 and most professional schools devote minimal, if any, training to identify and address the treatment of cognitive impairment. Clinicians need education about the importance of intervention. This is essential to improving behavioral health services. Obstacles must be removed. Professional help for cognitive problems should be easier to find, and reimbursement for cognitive rehabilitation treatments needs to move beyond select diagnostic groups, given evidence of broader effectiveness. A national approach is necessary to build on the state efforts made to date.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
THINKING WELL and Cognitive Remediation to Promote Recovery are supported by the New York State Office of Mental Health.
REFERENCES
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Healthy Aging. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/aging/pdf/perceptions_of_cog_hlth_factsheet.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2016.
- 2.Warren-Findlow J, Price AE, Hochhalter AK, Laditka JN. Primary care providers’ sources and preferences for cognitive health information in the United States. Health Promot Int. 2010;25(4):464–473. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.National Institute of Mental Health. Serious mental illness (SMI) among US adults. Available at: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/serious-mental-illness-smi-among-us-adults.shtml. Accessed September 9, 2016.
- 4.Kurtz M. Cognitive remediation for psychological disorders: an overview. In: Medalia A, Bowie CR, editors. Cognitive Remediation to Improve Functional Outcomes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2016. pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Keshavan MS, Vinogradov S, Rumsey J, Sherrill J, Wagner A. Cognitive training in mental disorders: update and future directions. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171(5):510–522. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13081075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Keefe RSE, Bilder RM, Davis SM et al. Neurocognitive effects of antipsychotic medications in patients with chronic schizophrenia in the CATIE trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:633–647. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.6.633. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Medalia A, Saperstein AM. Does cognitive remediation for schizophrenia improve functional outcomes? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013;26:151–157. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32835dcbd4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]