Abstract
Background
Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) remains under-appreciated in the perioperative environment. We aimed to characterize risk factors for perioperative TACO and better understand its impact on patient-important outcomes.
Methods
In this case-control study, 163 adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery who developed perioperative TACO were matched with 726 transfused controls who did not develop respiratory complications. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate potential risk factors for TACO. The need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay and mortality were compared.
Results
For this cohort, the mean age was 71 years and 56% were male. Multivariable analysis revealed the following independent predictors of TACO: emergency surgery, chronic kidney disease, left ventricular dysfunction, prior beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist use, isolated fresh frozen plasma transfusion (versus isolated erythrocyte transfusion), mixed product transfusion (versus isolated erythrocyte transfusion), and increasing intraoperative fluid administration. Patients who developed TACO were more likely to require postoperative mechanical ventilation (73% versus 33%; p<0.001) and experienced prolonged ICU (11.1 versus 6.5 days; p<0.001) and hospital lengths of stay (19.9 versus 9.6 days; p<0.001). Survival was significantly reduced (p<0.001) in transfusion recipients who developed TACO (1-year survival 72% versus 84%).
Conclusions
Perioperative TACO was associated with a protracted hospital course and increased mortality. Efforts to minimize the incidence of TACO should focus on the judicious use of intraoperative blood transfusions and non-sanguineous fluid therapies, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease, left ventricular dysfunction, chronic beta-blocker therapy, and those requiring emergency surgery.
Introduction
Approximately 30 million allogeneic blood components are transfused annually in the United States (US)1, with perioperative transfusions accounting for approximately 25% of these2. Notably, the incidence of transfusion-related infectious complications has fallen dramatically3. As a result, many consider transfusion therapies to be “safer than ever”4,5. However, the frequency and impact of non-infectious complications such as transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) and transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) have been increasingly described and appreciated6–14. Indeed, TACO has been identified as a major area of interest for national research networks such as the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute-funded Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Survey III research network15.
Characteristically described as a syndrome of acute respiratory distress with tachycardia and hypertension following blood product administration, formal criteria for TACO have only recently been endorsed. The two most widely accepted definitions include those put forth by the National Healthcare Safety Network and the International Society of Blood Transfusion (Table 1)16,17. Both of these criteria require a new onset or worsening of respiratory distress within six hours of completion of blood product transfusion and include parameters for fluid balance, evidence of heart failure and radiographic evidence of circulatory overload. The International Society of Blood Transfusion definition includes additional hemodynamic vital sign parameters consistent with circulatory overload.
Table 1.
Definitions for Transfusion-Associated Circulatory Overload
| NHSN TACO Definition 2016 |
|---|
New onset or exacerbation of ≥3 of the following within 6 hours of transfusion:
|
|
ISBT TACO Definition 2011 |
Any 4 of the following occurring within 6 hours of completion of transfusion:
|
Adapted from Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The National Healthcare Safety Network Manual: Biovigilance Component [Internet]. Atlanta, GA [2016 Jan] Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/biovigilance/bv-hv-protocol-current.pdf and
The Transfusion-associated circulatory overload Definition (2011 revision) by the International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on Haemovigilance in collaboration with The International Haemovigilance Network [Internet] Available from: http://www.ihn-org.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ISBT-definitions-for-non-infectious-transfusion-reactions.pdf
NHSN = National Healthcare Safety Network, TACO = Transfusion-Associated Circulatory Overload, ISBT = International Society of Blood Transfusion
Historically, TACO has been estimated to occur in approximately 1% to 10% of all transfused patients18–20. More recently, it was suggested to occur in 3% to 5.5% of transfused non-cardiac surgical patients6. Importantly, TACO was the second leading cause of transfusion-related fatalities in the US in 2014 accounting for 22% of all transfusion-related deaths reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)3. Meanwhile, in 2013, TACO accounted for 55% of all transfusion-related fatalities reported to the Serious Hazards of Transfusion group in the United Kingdom21. TACO also appears to be dramatically under-reported6,22,23.
Although the risk factors and clinical impact of TACO have previously been explored in heterogeneous hospitalized cohorts8, a contemporary evaluation of such risk factors in a well defined surgical population remains heretofore outstanding. In an effort to more fully inform the practice of perioperative transfusion medicine, we aimed to further clarify the risk factors underlying perioperative TACO in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgical procedures. Moreover, we aimed to improve our understanding of the impact of postoperative TACO on patient-important outcomes.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
This investigation utilized a case-control study design. All patients included in this study had valid research authorization. The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, USA, prior to its onset. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed in the conduct and reporting of this study24.
Study Population
One hundred and sixty three cases of TACO were matched with up to 5 transfused and complication free controls (n = 726). Patients were matched on age (+/− 5 years), sex, surgical specialty and year of surgery. Matching based upon surgical procedure was pursued as a result of our recent work suggesting that a significant proportion of TACO cases occur in patients undergoing thoracic, vascular and transplant surgery6. Matching based upon this variable was pursued with the aim of removing this risk factor as a confounder of additional risk factors of interest. Similarly, age and sex have previously been shown to be strongly associated with TACO in non-surgical populations10,13,18,25,26. Cases and controls were both selected from a cohort of adult patients recently identified at our institution who were transfused while undergoing non-cardiac surgery in the calendar years 2004 or 20116. These calendar years were specifically chosen in our original epidemiologic study, as they represent periods before and after the introduction of 2 major blood managements strategies at our institution, universal leukoreduction and deferral of female plasma donors. Exclusion criteria for the original cohort included the lack of research authorization; previous inclusion in the study (no patient was included more than once); age <18 years; pre-transfusion evidence of respiratory failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or diffuse bilateral infiltrates on chest radiographs; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification VI; or intraoperative death. The remaining patients in this cohort underwent an extensive evaluation for evidence of transfusion-related pulmonary complications within 6 hours of intraoperative transfusion as was previously described(6). For consistency, the National Healthcare Safety Network definition was used to identify cases of TACO16. Additional outcome adjudication categories included TRALI, defined as either TRALI, or possible TRALI (otherwise known as transfused acute respiratory distress syndrome) according to the 2004 consensus conference definition27; mixed TRALI and TACO, when evidence for both existed; or control if neither TRALI or TACO were identified. For the present investigation, those with either TACO or mixed TRALI/TACO were compared to controls. Those with isolated TRALI were excluded.
Data Collection
Variables considered as potential risk factors for TACO were identified based upon biologic plausibility and by review of the available literature8,13,18,25,26. These elements were extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) using institutional databases that have been previously validated28,29. These data included age; sex; type of surgery; year of surgery; type and volume of blood products transfused; intraoperative fluid administration; preoperative hemoglobin values; estimated blood volume; body mass index (BMI); estimated blood loss; duration of surgery; documented history of congestive heart failure (CHF), coronary artery disease or prior myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease (CKD), moderate to severe liver disease, or alcohol abuse; echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, evidenced by ejection fraction <60%, early diastolic mitral inflow velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity >15 or documented grade 3–4/4 diastolic dysfunction; and preoperative use of aspirin, diuretics or beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (β-blockers). Preoperative use of the medications of interest was defined as documented ongoing usage in the six-month interval preceding surgery. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification was extracted to further demonstrate the characteristics of our study population. When building our models, ASA status was not evaluated as a specific risk factor due to our desire to focus more specifically on individual comorbidities and the problems with co-linearity and over fitting of models that might occur should these comorbidities and ASA status both be included in our model. The patient-important outcomes evaluated included intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, and survival following the index surgical procedure. Dates of death and last follow-up were obtained using institutional resources.
Statistical Analysis
The baseline characteristics of our study sample are presented as median and interquartile range for continuous variables and number (%) for binary or categorical data. The association of each characteristic with TACO was assessed using univariate conditional logistic regression analysis in order to account for the matching procedures with SAS statistical software version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary NC). In addition to these unadjusted analyses, each risk factor was also assessed using multivariable conditional logistic regression with intraoperative blood volume and non-sanguineous intravascular (IV) fluid volume included as covariates to account for the vastly differing volume of these products administered intraoperatively between groups. Co-linearity was assessed at multiple points while building our multivariable model using variance inflation factors for each variable included in the model. Variables that remained significant predictors of TACO following the fluid volume-adjusted analyses (p < 0.05) were chosen for inclusion in a final multivariable conditional logistic model. Finally, subset analyses were carried out, excluding patients with evidence of both TRALI and TACO in order to ensure that our findings were not confounded by this particular group of patients in whom a differing phenotype may be expected. In all cases findings are summarized by presenting the odds ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)) and corresponding two-tailed p-value. The sample size for this study was based upon available data, with no a priori power calculation being performed. To maximize the power of this study, 1:5 matching of cases to controls was utilized. Caution was taken to avoid over fitting models by evaluating no more than 1variable per 10 observations (cases of TACO). Supplemental analyses were performed to compare clinical outcomes within subgroups. Need for postoperative mechanical ventilation is summarized as number (%) and compared between groups using conditional logistic regression with preoperative ASA status included as a covariate in order to account for chronic comorbidities and acuity of illness. Postoperative survival is summarized with hazard ratios (95% CI) and corresponding p-value using the Kaplan Meier method and analyzed using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression taking into account the matched set study design and with preoperative ASA status included as a covariate. Postoperative ICU and hospital lengths of stay are displayed as median and interquartile range, and analyzed using quantile regression with matching variables and ASA status included as covariates. Findings were considered statistically significant where p < 0.05.
Results
A total of 52,139 adult patients underwent non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia at our institution during the years 2004 and 2011. Of these, 4,234 received intraoperative transfusion. After exclusion criteria were applied, 4,070 patients were evaluated for evidence of perioperative transfusion-related pulmonary complications. From this cohort, 154 patients were found to have TACO, 23 patients were found to have TRALI, and 22 patients were felt to have evidence for both TRALI and TACO. A total of 3,871 had no evidence of post-transfusion pulmonary compromise6. From the cohort of 176 patients with evidence of TACO, 163 cases were successfully matched with up to 5 complication-free transfused controls (n = 726) making up the participants of this case-control study. For 13 cases, no suitable controls were able to be identified from our cohort due to the absence of a matching procedural code. Of these 13 patients, 11 had TACO alone, while 2 had evidence of TRALI and TACO, 7 (54%) were male, 7 (54%) underwent surgery of interest in 2004, the mean age was 74 years, 2 patients were undergoing orthopedic surgery, 5 were undergoing vascular surgery, 5 were undergoing general surgery, and 1 was undergoing neurosurgery. Overall, 123 patients were successfully matched with 5 controls, 10 patients were matched with 4 controls, 17 were matched with 3 controls, 7 were matched with 2 controls and 6 were matched with only 1 control.
Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 2. Matching was successful with no significant differences between cases and controls with regard to age, sex, type of surgery or surgical year (all p > 0.05). Patients with TACO were more likely to have preoperative echocardiographic evidence of LV dysfunction. In addition, they were more likely to have a higher BMI, pre-existing CKD and be using diuretics or β-blockers in the 6 month period prior to surgery. Patients with TACO were also more likely to present for emergency surgery, have a longer duration of surgery, and received greater volumes of blood products, as well as non-sanguineous IV fluids. Patients who developed TACO were more likely to receive plasma or mixed product transfusion episodes rather than isolated RBC transfusions. In contrast, controls were more likely to receive isolated RBC transfusions. None of the TACO cases received platelet transfusions in isolation. Preoperative hemoglobin values were statistically lower in patients with TACO, but this difference did not appear to be clinically significant. There were no significant between-group differences in estimated blood volume, coronary artery disease, clinical notes documenting CHF or liver disease, alcohol abuse or preoperative aspirin use (Table 2). Missing data were similar for both cases and control, and are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2.
Baseline Characteristics
| Characteristic (all n (%) unless otherwise indicated) | TACO (N=163§) | Control (N=726§) | P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Age (years)‡ | 71 (61 – 79) | 71 (61 – 78) | † |
|
| |||
| Male Gender | 91 (55.8) | 411 (56.6) | † |
|
| |||
| Type of surgery | † | ||
| Abdominal | 37 (22.7) | 182 (25.1) | |
| OB/GYN | 4 (2.5) | 19 (2.6) | |
| Neurologic | 3 (1.8) | 13 (1.8) | |
| Orthopedic | 20 (12.3) | 94 (12.9) | |
| Spine | 6 (3.7) | 30 (4.1) | |
| Thoracic | 10 (6.1) | 39 (5.4) | |
| Transplant | 17 (10.4) | 76 (10.5) | |
| Urology | 7 (4.3) | 28 (3.9) | |
| Vascular | 56 (34.4) | 236 (32.5) | |
| Other | 3 (1.8) | 9 (1.2) | |
|
| |||
| Year of surgery | † | ||
| 2004 | 112 (68.7) | 490 (67.5) | |
| 2011 | 51 (31.3) | 236 (32.5) | |
|
| |||
| ASA physical status | 0.002 | ||
| I | 1 (0.6) | 6 (0.8) | |
| II | 10 (6.1) | 104 (14.3) | |
| III | 108 (66.3) | 497 (68.5) | |
| IV | 40 (24.5) | 114 (15.7) | |
| V | 4 (2.5) | 5 (0.7) | |
|
| |||
| Intraoperative Transfusion Volume (mL)‡ | 1154 (600 – 3649) | 660 (350 – 1125) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Positive Intraoperative Fluid Balance (mL)‡ | 5606 (3400 – 7806) | 4128 (2942 – 5816) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Blood Product Type | <0.001 | ||
| Erythrocytes only | 85 (52.1) | 584 (80.4) | |
| FFP only | 9 (5.5) | 14 (1.9) | |
| Plts only | 0 (0) | 17 (2.3) | |
| Mixed Products | 69 (42.3) | 111 (15.3) | |
|
| |||
| Estimated Blood Volume (L)‡ | 4.9 (4.0 – 5.6) | 4.9 (4.1 – 5.6) | 0.363 |
|
| |||
| Estimated Blood Loss (mL)‡ | 687 (156 – 1825) | 500 (100 – 1000) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Preoperative Hemoglobin (g/dL)‡ | 11.7 (9.7 – 13.2) | 11.8 (10.1 – 13.3) | 0.039 |
|
| |||
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2)‡ | 28.4 (24.4 – 32.8) | 27.4 (24.0 – 31.5) | 0.022 |
|
| |||
| Emergency Surgery | 53 (32.5) | 101 (13.9) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Duration of Surgery (mins) | 272 (172 – 430) | 261 (178 – 357) | 0.001 |
|
| |||
| Chronic Kidney Disease | 36 (22.1) | 104 (14.3) | 0.020 |
|
| |||
| Congestive Heart Failure | 17 (10.4) | 51 (7.0) | 0.158 |
|
| |||
| Echo evidence of LV dysfunction | 39 (23.9) | 100 (13.8) | 0.002 |
|
| |||
| Preoperative Beta blocker | 108 (66.3) | 390 (53.7) | 0.002 |
|
| |||
| Preoperative Diuretic | 79 (48.5) | 281 (38.7) | 0.012 |
|
| |||
| Preoperative Aspirin | 84 (51.5) | 400 (55.1) | 0.408 |
|
| |||
| Coronary Artery Disease | 52 (31.9) | 233 (32.1) | 0.900 |
|
| |||
| Moderate to Severe Liver Dx | 11 (6.8) | 32 (4.4) | 0.072 |
|
| |||
| History Alcohol Abuse | 11 (6.8) | 32 (5.2) | 0.440 |
TACO = transfusion associated circulatory overload, OB/GYN = obstetrics and gynecology, ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists, FFP = fresh frozen plasma, Plts = platelets, LV = left ventricular, Dx = disease
Each characteristic was assessed separately using conditional logistic regression taking into account the matched set study design
Cases and controls were matched on these variables
Median (interquartile range)
BMI and estimated blood volume were missing for 10 (6%) TACO and 32 (4%) Controls, hemoglobin was missing for 12 (7%) TACO and 30 (4%) Controls, estimated blood loss was missing for 15 (9%) TACO and 59 (8%) controls, and duration of surgery was missing for 3 (2%) TACO and 9 (1%) controls.
Due to a significant association between TACO and both intraoperative transfusion and non-sanguineous IV fluid volumes, analyses were adjusted for these volumes in an effort to control for their confounding effects (Table 3). After adjusting for total fluid volumes, TACO remained associated with emergency surgery, CKD, echocardiographic evidence of LV dysfunction, lower preoperative hemoglobin, preoperative diuretic administration, and preoperative β-blocker use (Table 3). In addition, patients with TACO were more likely to have received either plasma only or mixed blood product transfusion episodes as compared to isolated RBC transfusion (Table 3). No evidence of co-linearity was detected, with a maximal variance inflation factor of 1.74. In these adjusted analyses, there was no longer a significant relationship between TACO and duration of surgery or BMI. Similarly, no association was demonstrated between TACO and clinical documentation of CHF, coronary artery disease, moderate to severe liver disease, alcohol abuse, estimated blood volume, estimated blood loss or preoperative aspirin use (Table 3).
Table 3.
Mutlivariable analyses evaluating risk factors for TACO
| Volume Adjusted Analysis* | Multivariable Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Characteristic | OR (95% CI) | P-value | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|
| ||||
| Intraoperative Transfusion Volume (mL)† | – | – | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.1) | 0.273 |
|
| ||||
| Non-sanguineous Fluid Volume (mL)† | – | – | 1.1 (1.1 – 1.1) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Blood Product Type‡ | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
| FFP only | 6.2 (2.3 – 17.0) | 6.2 (1.8 – 21.7) | ||
| Plts only | N/A | N/A | ||
| Mixed | 3.4 (2.0 – 5.8) | 1.9 (1.0 – 3.4) | ||
|
| ||||
| Estimated Blood Volume (mL)† | 1.0 (0.8 – 1.3) | 0.891 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Estimated Blood Loss (mL)† | 1.0 (0.9 – 1.1) | 0.496 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Preoperative Hemoglobin (g/dL)§ | 0.9 (0.8 – 1.0) | 0.009 | 0.9 (0.8 – 1.0) | 0.224 |
|
| ||||
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2)ǁ | 1.0 (1.0 – 1.1) | 0.072 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Emergency Surgery | 4.6 (2.7 – 7.6) | <0.001 | 3.9 (2.1 – 7.2) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| Duration of Surgery¶ | 0.9 (0.8 – 1.0) | 0.106 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Chronic Kidney Disease | 2.0 (1.2 – 3.2) | 0.006 | 2.1 (1.2 – 3.7) | 0.007 |
|
| ||||
| Congestive Heart Failure | 1.8 (1.0 – 3.4) | 0.057 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Echo evidence of LV dysfunction | 2.1 (1.3 – 3.3) | 0.001 | 1.8 (1.1 – 3.1) | 0.028 |
|
| ||||
| Preoperative Beta blocker | 1.9 (1.3 – 2.9) | 0.002 | 1.8 (1.1 – 2.9) | 0.027 |
|
| ||||
| Preoperative Diuretic | 1.5 (1.0 – 2.2) | 0.030 | 1.4 (0.9 – 2.1) | 0.173 |
|
| ||||
| Preoperative Aspirin | 0.9 (0.6 – 1.4) | 0.785 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Coronary Artery Disease | 1.2 (0.8 – 1.8) | 0.497 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Moderate to Severe Liver Dx | 1.3 (0.5 – 3.6) | 0.653 | – | – |
|
| ||||
| Alcohol Abuse | 0.8 (0.4 – 1.7) | 0.500 | – | – |
TACO = Transfusion Associated Circulatory Overload, OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, FFP = fresh frozen plasma, Plts = platelets, LV = left ventricular, Dx = disease, N/A = not applicable
each of the characteristics were assessed separately using conditional logistic regression with intraoperative transfusion volume and non-sanguineous fluid volume included as covariates
Odds ratios are presented for a 500 ml increase
Compared to red blood cell transfusion only
per g/dL increase
per kg/m2 increase
per 60 minute increase
Table 3 displays the results of the multivariable analysis modeling the relationships between variables identified as having a statistically significant association with TACO in the fluid volume-adjusted analyses and the outcome of TACO. This final multivariable model demonstrated statistically significant relationships between TACO and emergency surgery; chronic kidney; echocardiographic evidence of LV; preoperative β-blocker utilization; blood product type, plasma and mixed blood products (both p = 0.011) and increasing IV fluid volume. Transfusion volume, diuretic use and preoperative hemoglobin were no longer statistically significant in the final multivariable model (Table 3).
In terms of the patient-important outcomes assessed in this investigation, patients who developed perioperative TACO (when compared to controls) following intraoperative blood product transfusion had a significantly greater need for postoperative mechanical ventilation (73.0 % vs. 33.2 %, p < 0.001). Of those patients requiring postoperative ICU care [TACO n = 161 (98.8 %), controls n = 520 (71.6 %)], ICU length of stay was significantly increased in the TACO cohort [11.1 days (95% CI 4.3 – 30.5) vs. 6.5 days (95% CI 2.9 – 19.1), covariate adjusted p < 0.001]. Postoperative hospital length of stay was also significantly longer in those who experienced perioperative TACO [12 days (95% CI 7 – 22) vs. 5 days (95% CI 7 – 10), covariate adjusted p < 0.001]. Moreover, survival was notably reduced in those who experienced perioperative TACO (hazard ratio = 2.1, 95% C.I. 1.7 to 2.4, p < 0.001) (Figure. 1, Table 4).
Figure 1. Overall Survival Curves from Date of Surgery for Cases and Controls.

Postoperative survival Kaplan Meier Curve analyzed using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression taking into account the matched set study design. Median follow up for both groups was two years. *TACO = Transfusion associated circulatory overload
Table 4.
Clinical Outcomes of Cases and Controls
| Outcome | TACO (N=163) |
Control (N=726) |
P-value* |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| ICU LOS days, median (IQR) |
(n = 161, 98.8%) 11.1 (4.3 – 30.5) |
(n = 520, 71.6%) 6.5 (2.6 – 19.1) |
<0.001 |
|
| |||
| Hospital LOS days, median (IQR) | 12 (7 – 22) | 7 (5 – 10) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Postoperative mechanical ventilation, n (%) | 119 (73.0) | 241 (33.2) | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| Survival, % (95% CI) | <0.001 | ||
| 1 month | 92.4 (88.4 – 96.6) | 96.0 (94.6 – 97.5) | |
| 3 months | 84.9 (79.3 – 90.8) | 93.5 (91.6 – 95.3) | |
| 1 year | 71.5 (64.5 – 79.4) | 84.2 (81.5 – 87.0) | |
ICU - intensive care unit, LOS - length of stay, IQR - interquartile range, TACO - transfusion associated circulatory overload
ICU and Hospital LOS were compared between groups using quantile regression with matching variables and preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status included as covariates. Postoperative mechanical ventilation was compared between groups using conditional logistic regression with preoperative ASA status included as a covariate. Survival estimates at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year using the Kaplan-Meier method and overall survival was compared between groups using stratified Cox proportional hazards regression with preoperative ASA status included as a covariate.
Subset analyses performed after excluding patients with evidence of TRALI showed no significant differences in baseline characteristics (see table supplemental digital content 1), univariate (see table supplemental digital content 2) or multivariate models (see table supplemental digital content 3).
Discussion
In this study, we have demonstrated that premorbid conditions (CKD, LV dysfunction), baseline medications (β-blockers), procedural details (emergency surgery), intraoperative care delivery factors (increasing IV non-sanguineous fluid volume), and blood product type (plasma or mixed product transfusion episodes) are independently predictive of perioperative TACO. A number of these findings are consistent with risk factors previously described in heterogeneous patients populations8,13,30. Uniquely, we have demonstrated an increased risk of TACO in those coming to emergency surgery. Of interest, we failed to demonstrate a relationship between blood product volume and TACO, after adjusting for other variables including non-sanguineous fluid balance and blood product type. Importantly, the presence of TACO negatively impacted patient-important outcomes with increased need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, increased ICU and hospital lengths of stay and significantly reduced short and long-term survival.
Our findings of increased rates of TACO in those with CKD, echocardiographic evidence of LV dysfunction, preoperative β-blocker use and greater volumes of IV fluid administration all support the notion that volume overload and hydrostatic pulmonary edema are central processes in TACO pathogenesis. The consistency with which these parameters have been associated with TACO in the literature supports the judicious use of blood product transfusion – and careful management of overall volume status – especially in patients with preexisting cardiac and renal dysfunction. Although the precise mechanisms underlying TACO remain under investigation, specifically with regard to the potential role of inflammatory or non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and while TACO may still occur even with conservative IV fluid administration, careful volume management would seem prudent regardless of etiology, since patients with increased capillary leak are also likely susceptible to pulmonary edema with increasing IV fluid administration. Interestingly, clinical documentation of CHF was not found to be a significant predictor of TACO in this study. Notably, 107 patients with echocardiographic evidence of either LV systolic or diastolic dysfunction within 6 months prior to surgery did not have CHF documented in their clinical notes. Similarly, 36 patients with clinical documentation of CHF had a normal echocardiogram in the six month interval prior to their surgical procedure. On this basis, we believe objective echocardiographic abnormalities may be a more sensitive and specific marker of LV dysfunction and risk for TACO than relying upon prior clinical documentation of CHF.
The association of preoperative β-blocker administration with risk for postoperative TACO is a novel study finding. We suspect that preoperative β-blocker use likely serves as a surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease and left ventricular dysfunction with the associated risk for developing TACO. Alternatively, patients taking β-blockers may be less well equipped to deal with acute intravascular volume expansion. Regardless, the observational nature of this investigation precludes definitive statements on the underlying pathophysiologic rationale relating β-blocker therapy to increased risk for postoperative TACO.
Receipt of either plasma products alone or mixed blood products remained independent predictors of TACO when compared to those who received RBCs exclusively. This relationship appeared robust, persisting after adjusting for intravenous fluid volume administration. This finding, combined with the fact that transfusion volume was not associated with TACO in the multivariable model, supports the potential for alternate mechanisms contributing to TACO pathogenesis – such as inflammatory processes. Notably, others have also identified this association. In 2011, Li et al. reported that plasma prescribed for the correction of an elevated international normalized ratio was strongly associated with TACO in the critically ill18. Similarly, in 2012, Narick and colleagues reported an incidence of TACO attributable to plasma of 4.8% in the non-operative setting23. Interestingly, these authors noted lower plasma infusion volumes and infusion rates in those who developed TACO when compared to those who did not developed this complication. This again raises the possibility of additional mechanisms underlying TACO beyond fluid overload.
The supposition that TACO may not be purely driven by volume overload was suggested by Popovsky et al. in 201031 when it was noted that TACO frequently occurred after 1–2 blood component transfusions, a volume that would not typically cause clinically significant fluid overload. Subsequently, Andrzejewski et al. reported approximately 65% of patients with TACO exhibited an inflammatory or febrile component with their clinical presentation32,33. Similar findings were also reported by the Quebec Hemovigilance System34. Observations such as these suggest the potential for inflammatory mechanisms contributing to TACO pathogenesis. A growing body of pre-clinical investigations have also suggested a potential role for RBC-derived microparticles, cell free hemoglobin and nitric oxide scavenging as a potential mechanism associated with TACO pathogenesis35–38. Clinically, this mechanism may underlie the characteristic hypertensive response seen in TACO. An additional observation suggesting the potential for alternate mechanisms underlying TACO pathogenesis is the notable lack of TACO in patients receiving washed cellular blood products39. Though the present study is unable to sufficiently address these hypotheses, evidence suggests further investigation may be warranted. Indeed, an NIH-funded clinical trial investigating this possibility remains underway (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02094118).
Our finding of an association between emergency surgery and TACO, though unique, is not entirely unforeseen. Indeed, in the cohort from which study participants were identified, it was noted that TACO was significantly more frequent amongst patients undergoing vascular, thoracic and organ transplantation surgery. It is presumed that these patients are more likely to carry sinister comorbidities and more frequently require transfusion therapies. In light of this fact, we matched patients in the present investigation on type of surgery, thereby permitting an evaluation of other important predictors of TACO without such confounding. However similar assertions could also be made about emergency surgery. By nature, these patients are presumed to be acutely unstable. Of note, a recent report from Murphy et al. suggested that surgery within 48 hours of a transfusion episode, particularly cardiac, liver and vascular surgery, were predictors of TACO8. Though this association lost statistical significance in Murphy’s multivariable analysis, it must be acknowledged that the cohort was very different from the present study. Specifically, their population included surgical and medical inpatients, the critically ill and transfused outpatients.
Amongst patients developing TACO, the need for postoperative mechanical ventilation, as well as the ICU and hospital lengths of stay were significantly increased – a finding that has been consistently duplicated in other investigations. Likewise, both short and long-term survival were noticeably reduced in patients with TACO. Similar associations attesting to the negative impact of TACO on patient-important outcomes have been described since the early 1990s30, however some reports have failed to duplicate these findings28, 17, 40. The negative impact of TACO on patient-important outcomes was most recently endorsed by Murphy et al.8. It should be noted that TACO remains a leading cause of transfusion related fatalities worldwide3,21,34. As such, measures aiming to prevent TACO, especially in high risk populations, should be employed in the perioperative period.
Our study has a number of strengths that deserve mention. Firstly, cases and controls were selected from a previously collected database of transfusion recipients who had undergone rigorous review for the outcome of TACO6. As such, we believe the findings described herein are truly representative of patients experiencing perioperative TACO. Secondly, relevant risk factors were extracted from the EMR using tools that have previously undergone extensive validation28,41–43. There are also several weaknesses that must be acknowledged. First, the observational nature of this study creates potential for confounding and bias. Although efforts were made to control for these issues in both the study design and statistical analyses, potential for unmeasured confounding effects clearly remains. If present, residual confounding has the potential to impact associations between the risk factors evaluated and TACO, as well as the associations with patient-important outcomes. The conduct of this study at a single tertiary care academic medical center is an additional limitation. Unique aspects relating to the patient’s cared for at this institution or the care delivered may preclude generalization of our results to patients at disparate institutions. External validation would greatly enhance the robustness of our findings. Finally, additional risk factors should be considered in future studies. As an example, the rate of transfusion administration – a risk factor reported in the literature18 – could not be evaluated in the present study as this data was not reliably available for all patients receiving intraoperative transfusions.
In summary, perioperative TACO is independently associated with CKD, LV dysfunction, pre-surgical β-blocker use, increasing intraoperative fluid administration, and emergency surgery. Until targeted therapies are available to treat TACO, prevention remains paramount with the avoidance of unnecessary transfusions being critically important. Particularly careful consideration regarding the appropriateness of a transfusion episode as well as the management of non-sanguinous fluid therapies should be employed in patients “at risk” for TACO as based on the highlighted risk factors. If transfusion is deemed unavoidable in such high risk patients, consideration of more intensive perioperative monitoring for signs respiratory distress may be justified. Finally, should the association between plasma therapies and TACO be confirmed in future clinical trials, the use of low-volume plasma alternatives such prothrombin complex concentrates may be warranted in at risk patients.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
With thanks to Dr. Sunil Mankad, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine – Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Nageshwar Madde, MS, information technology technical specialist in surgical and critical care systems, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Gregory Wilson, RRT, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA and Melissa Passe, RRT, Anesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, for their assistance in obtaining data necessary for the completion of this study
Funding: Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science Activities High-Impact, Pilot and Feasibility Award, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA, Grant Number RO1-HL121232; Critical Care Independent Multidisciplinary Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: None
References
- 1.American Red Cross. Blood Facts and Statistics 2015. Last accessed 5/18/2016, available at http://www.redcrossblood.org/learn-about-blood/blood-facts-and-statistics.
- 2.Whitaker BI. The 2011 National Blood Collection and Utilization Survey Report. Last accessed 5/18/2016, available at http://www.hhs.gov/ash/bloodsafety/2011-nbcus.pdf.
- 3.Fatalities Reported to FDA Following Blood Collection and Transfusion 2014. last accessed 5/18/2016, available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/ReportaProblem/TransfusionDonationFatalities/UCM459461.pdf.
- 4.Goodnough LT, Shander A. Blood Management. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007:695–701. doi: 10.5858/2007-131-695-BM. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Isbister JP, Shander A, Spahn DR, Erhard J, Farmer SL, Hofmann A. Adverse blood transfusion outcomes: establishing causation. Transfus Med Rev. 2011;25:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2010.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clifford L, Jia Q, Yadav H, Subramanian A, Wilson GA, Murphy SP, Pathak J, Schroeder DR, Ereth MH, Kor DJ. Characterising the Epidemiology of Transfusion-associated Circulatory Overload. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:21–8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Narick C, Triulzi DJ, Yazer MH,CN,DT,MHY. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload after plasma transfusion. Transfusion. 2011:1–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Murphy EL, Kwaan N, Looney MR, Gajic OMD, Hubmayr RD, Gropper MA, Koenigsberg M, Wilson GA, Matthay MA, Bacchetti P, Toy P. Risk factors and outcomes in transfusion-associated circulatory overload. Am J Med. 2013;126:357, e29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Popovsky MA. Pulmonary consequences of transfusion: TRALI and TACO. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006;34:243–4. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2006.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Alam A, Lin Y, Lima A, Hansen M, Callum JL. The prevention of transfusion-associated circulatory overload. Transfus Med Rev. 2013;27:105–12. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2013.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clifford L, Jia Q, Subramanian A, Yadav H, Wilson GA, Murphy SP, Pathak J, Schroeder DR, Kor DJ. Characterizing the Epidemiology of Postoperative Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury. Anesthesiology. 2015;122:12–20. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Menis M, Anderson SA, Forshee RA, Mckean S, Johnson C, Warnock R, Gondalia R, Mintz PD, Holness L, Worrall CM, Kelman JA, Izurieta HS, Al MET. Transfusion-related acute lung injury and potential risk factors among the inpatient US elderly as recorded in Medicare claims data, during 2007 through 2011. Transfusion. 2014;54:2182–93. doi: 10.1111/trf.12626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Menis M, Anderson SA, Forshee RA, Mckean S, Johnson C, Holness L, Warnock R, Gondalia R, Worrall CM, Kelman JA, Ball R, Izurieta HS. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO) and potential risk factors among the inpatient US elderly as recorded in Medicare administrative databases during 2011. Vox Sang. 2014;106:144–52. doi: 10.1111/vox.12070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Looney MR, Roubinian N, Gajic O, Gropper MA, Hubmayr RD, Lowell CA, Bacchetti P, Wilson G, Koenigsberg M, Lee DC, Wu P, Grimes B, Norris PJ, Murphy EL, Gandhi MJ, Winters JL, Mair DC, Schuller RM, Hirschler NV, Rosen RS, Matthay MA, Toy P. Prospective study on the clinical course and outcomes in transfusion-related acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2014;42:1676–87. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kleinman S, Busch MP, Murphy EL, Shan H, Ness P, Glynn SA. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS-III): a research program striving to improve blood donor and transfusion recipient outcomes. Transfusion. 2014;54:942–55. doi: 10.1111/trf.12468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.The National Healthcare Safety Network, Biovigilance Component, Hemovigilance Component Surveillance Protocol. 2016 Jan; Last accessed 5/18/2016, available from http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/pdfs/biovigilance/bv-hv-protocol-current.pdf.
- 17.International Society of Blood Transfusion Working Party on Haemovigilance, Proposed standard definitions for surveillance of non-infectious adverse transfusion reactions. 2011 Jul; Last accessed 5/18/2016, available at http://www.ihn-org.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ISBT-definitions-for-non-infectious-transfusion-reactions.pdf.
- 18.Li G, Rachmale S, Kojicic M, Shahjehan K, Malinchoc M, Kor DJ, Gajic O. Incidence and transfusion risk factors for transfusion-associated circulatory overload among medical intensive care unit patients. Transfusion. 2011;51:338–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02816.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Popovsky MA. Transfusion and the lung: circulatory overload and acute lung injury. Vox Sang. 2004;87:s62–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6892.2004.00453.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rana R, Fernández-Pérez ER, Khan SA, Rana S, Winters JL, Lesnick TG, Moore SB, Gajic O. Transfusion-related acute lung injury and pulmonary edema in critically ill patients: a retrospective study. Transfusion. 2006;46:1478–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00930.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bolton-Maggs PH, Cohen H. Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) haemovigilance and progress is improving transfusion safety. Br J Haematol. 2013;163:303–14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Clifford L, Singh A, Wilson GA, Toy P, Gajic O, Malinchoc M, Herasevich V, Pathak J, Kor DJ. Electronic health record surveillance algorithms facilitate the detection of transfusion-related pulmonary complications. Transfusion. 2013;53:1205–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03886.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Narick C, Triulzi DJ, Yazer MH. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload after plasma transfusion. Transfusion. 2012;52:160–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03247.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Piccin A, Cronin M, Murphy C, Eakins E, Lawlor E. Transfusion associated circulatory overload (TACO) incidence and risk factors. The American Society of Hematology (ASH) 51st annual meeting; New Orleans. 2009. p. 3157. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Skeate RC, Eastlund T. Distinguishing between transfusion related acute lung injury and transfusion associated circulatory overload. Curr Opin Hematol. 2007;14:682–7. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e3282ef195a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kleinman S, Caulfield T, Chan P, Davenport R, McFarland J, McPhedran S, Meade M, Morrison D, Pinsent T, Robillard P, Slinger P. Toward an understanding of transfusion-related acute lung injury: statement of a consensus panel. Transfusion. 2004;44:1774–89. doi: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2004.04347.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Herasevich V, Kor DJ, Li M, Pickering BW. ICU data mart: a non-iT approach. A team of clinicians, researchers and informatics personnel at the Mayo Clinic have taken a homegrown approach to building an ICU data mart. Heal Inf. 2011;28:42,44–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Zheng J, Sohn S, Kipper-Schuler KC, Chute CG. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2010;17:507–13. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.001560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Popovsky MA, Audet AM, Andrzejewski C., Jr Transfusion-associated circulatory overload in orthopedic surgery patients: a multi-institutional study. Immunohematology. 1996;12:87–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Popovsky MA. The Emily Cooley Lecture 2009 To breathe or not to breathe-that is the question. Transfusion. 2010;50:2057–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02788.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Andrzejewski C, Jr, Popovsky MA, Stec TC, Provencher J, O’Hearn L, Visintainer P, Steingrub J. Hemotherapy bedside biovigilance involving vital sign values and characteristics of patients with suspected transfusion reactions associated with fluid challenges: can some cases of transfusion-associated circulatory overload have proinflammatory aspects? Transfusion. 2012;52:2310–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andrzejewski C, Jr, Casey MA, Popovsky MA. How we view and approach transfusion-associated circulatory overload: pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, mitigation, and prevention. Transfusion. 2013;53:3037–47. doi: 10.1111/trf.12454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Robillard P, Karl Itaj N, Chapdelaine A. Transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO): The new leading cause of transfusion-associated fatalities reported to the Quebec hemovigilance system. Blood Transfus. 2010;8:s32. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Donadee C, Raat NJ, Kanias T, Tejero J, Lee JS, Kelley EE, Zhao X, Liu C, Reynolds H, Azarov I, Frizzell S, Meyer EM, Donnenberg AD, Qu L, Triulzi D, Kim-Shapiro DB, Gladwin MT. Nitric oxide scavenging by red blood cell microparticles and cell-free hemoglobin as a mechanism for the red cell storage lesion. Circulation. 2011;124:465–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.008698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gladwin MT, Kim-Shapiro DB. Storage lesion in banked blood due to hemolysis-dependent disruption of nitric oxide homeostasis. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16:515–23. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0b013e32833157f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baek JH, D’Agnillo F, Vallelian F, Pereira CP, Williams MC, Jia Y, Schaer DJ, Buehler PW. Hemoglobin-driven pathophysiology is an in vivo consequence of the red blood cell storage lesion that can be attenuated in guinea pigs by haptoglobin therapy. J Clin Invest. 2012;122:1444–58. doi: 10.1172/JCI59770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Baron DM, Beloiartsev A, Nakagawa A, Martyn T, Stowell CP, Malhotra R, Mayeur C, Bloch KD, Zapol WM. Adverse effects of hemorrhagic shock resuscitation with stored blood are ameliorated by inhaled nitric oxide in lambs. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:2492–501. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828cf456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Blumberg N, Heal JM, Gettings KF, Phipps RP, Masel D, Refaai MA, Kirkley SA, Fialkow LB. An association between decreased cardiopulmonary complications (transfusion-related acute lung injury and transfusion-associated circulatory overload) and implementation of universal leukoreduction of blood transfusions. Transfusion. 2010;50:2738–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02748.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li GMD, Kojicic MMD, Reriani MKMD, Fernandez Perez ERMD, Thakur LMD, Kashyap RMD, Van Buskirk CMMD, Gajic OFCCPMD, Li G, Kojicic M, Reriani MK, Fernandez Perez ER, Thakur L, Kashyap R, Van Buskirk CM, Gajic O. Long-term survival and quality of life after transfusion-associated pulmonary edema in critically ill medical patients. Chest. 2010;137:783–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chute CG, Beck SA, Fisk TB, Mohr DN. The Enterprise Data Trust at Mayo Clinic: a semantically integrated warehouse of biomedical data. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 2010;17:131–5. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Alsara A, Warner DO, Li G, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Kor DJ. Derivation and validation of automated electronic search strategies to identify pertinent risk factors for postoperative acute lung injury. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86:382–8. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Singh B, Singh A, Ahmed A, Wilson GA, Pickering BW, Herasevich V, Gajic O, Li G. Derivation and validation of automated electronic search strategies to extract Charlson comorbidities from electronic medical records. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87:817–24. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
