Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology logoLink to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology
. 2017 Feb 15;8(1):1–2. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v8.i1.1

Impaired inactivation of digestive proteases: The possible key factor for the high susceptibility of germ-free and antibiotic-treated animals to gut epithelial injury

Xiaofa Qin 1
PMCID: PMC5311466  PMID: 28251033

Abstract

Recent study shows that germ-free and antibiotic-treated animals are highly susceptible to gut epithelial injury. This paper addresses that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases may be the key factor for the increased susceptibility.

Keywords: Digestive proteases, Germ-free, Antibiotics, Gut microbiota, Gut epithelial injury


Core tip: This paper addresses that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases may be the possible key factor for the high susceptibility of germ-free and antibiotic-treated animals to gut epithelial injury.

COMMENTARY ON HOT TOPICS

I read with great interest the paper by Hernández-Chirlaque et al[1] regarding the high susceptibility of germ-free and antibiotic-treated mice to epithelial injury. It is found that germ-free mice treated with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) showed only minimal inflammation (no colonic thickening, lower myeloperoxidase activity, IL-6, IL-17, TNF-alpha and IFN-gamma secretion by splenocytes and mesenteric cell cultures, etc.), but enhanced hemorrhage, epithelial injury and mortality along with weakened intestinal barrier. Animals treated with antibiotics also showed similar but less severe changes with intermediate effects. That paper discussed the interaction among gut bacteria, immune cells, and epithelial cells through inflammatory mediators, cytokines, bioactive molecules, receptors, ligands, transcription factors, and pathways, but failed to provide a coherent mechanistic explanation. Here I suggest that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases may be the key factor for the observed increased susceptibility. Studies have well documented that large amount of digestive proteases can be found in the large intestine of germ-free or antibiotics-treated animals but not in animals raised at conventional condition[2-7]. As we know, the gut is mainly protected by a layer of mucus secreted from goblet cells. Mucin, the structural molecule of mucus, contains a central core of peptide and side carbohydrate branches that can constitute up to 85% of the molecule. These carbohydrate side chains greatly retarded degradation of the protective mucus layer and damage of the underlying gut tissue by the digestive proteases being existed in germ-free or antibiotics-treated animals. However, the great destructive potency of these digestive proteases would be released and manifested once the gut barrier is broken as occurred either shortly after treatment with high concentrations of DSS or prolonged treatment with lower dose of DSS, resulting in the severe damage of epithelial cells at gut surface and then blood vessels in the mucosa, leading to excessive blood loss and enhanced mortality, even in the absence of remarkably inflammation. This would be similar to the so-called tryptic hemorrhagic necrosis of the gut as seen in animals under shock, which can be greatly prevented by previous inactivation of digestive proteases or ligation of pancreatic duct[8]. In fact, evidences I collected during the last fifteen years make me to believe that impaired inactivation of digestive proteases due to reduction in gut bacteria along with the improved hygiene and inhibition by some dietary chemicals such as saccharin and sucralose may have also played critical causative role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in human[9-11]. Thus, impaired inactivation of digestive proteases in colitis and IBD would be worthwhile for further study.

Footnotes

Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A, A, A

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

Conflict-of-interest statement: There is no conflict of interest.

Peer-review started: October 11, 2016

First decision: December 13, 2016

Article in press: January 3, 2017

P- Reviewer: Matowicka-Karna J, Yang CH, Zhu YL S- Editor: Qi Y L- Editor: A E- Editor: Li D

References

  • 1.Hernández-Chirlaque C, Aranda CJ, Ocón B, Capitán-Cañadas F, Ortega-González M, Carrero JJ, Suárez MD, Zarzuelo A, Sánchez de Medina F, Martínez-Augustin O. Germ-free and Antibiotic-treated Mice are Highly Susceptible to Epithelial Injury in DSS Colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2016;10:1324–1335. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Norin KE. Influence of antibiotics on some intestinal microflora associated characteristics. Anaerobe. 1997;3:145–148. doi: 10.1006/anae.1997.0091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Genell S, Gustafsson BE. Impaired enteric degradation of pancreatic endopeptidases in antibiotic-treated rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1977;12:801–809. doi: 10.3109/00365527709181723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Genell S, Gustafsson BE, Ohlsson K. Quantitation of active pancreatic endopeptidases in the intestinal contents of germfree and conventional rats. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1976;11:757–762. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gustafsson BE. The physiological importance of the colonic microflora. ScandJ Gastroenterol Suppl. 1982;77:117–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Midtvedt T, Carlstedt-Duke B, Höverstad T, Midtvedt AC, Norin KE, Saxerholt H. Establishment of a biochemically active intestinal ecosystem in ex-germfree rats. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1987;53:2866–2871. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.12.2866-2871.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reddy BS, Pleasants JR, Wostmann BS. Pancreatic enzymes in germfree and conventional rats fed chemically defined, water-soluble diet free from natural substrates. J Nutr. 1969;97:327–334. doi: 10.1093/jn/97.3.327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bounous G. Metabolic changes in the intestinal mucosa during hemorrhagic shock. Can J Surg. 1965;8:332–339. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Qin XF. Impaired inactivation of digestive proteases by deconjugated bilirubin: the possible mechanism for inflammatory bowel disease. Med Hypotheses. 2002;59:159–163. doi: 10.1016/s0306-9877(02)00243-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Qin X. Etiology of inflammatory bowel disease: a unified hypothesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1708–1722. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i15.1708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Qin X. Publications by Xiaofa Qin. [accessed 2016 Oct 8] Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=xiaofa qin. [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES