Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1976 Oct 1;80A(5-6):761–774. doi: 10.6028/jres.080A.070

Phase Equilibria and Crystal Growth in the Alkali Antimonate Systems Sb2O4–NaSbO3/ Sb2O4–KSbO3/, and Sb2O4–NaSbO3–NaF*

J L Waring 1, R S Roth 1, H S Parker 1, W S Brower Jr 1
PMCID: PMC5312759  PMID: 32196298

Abstract

Phase equilibrium diagrams have been constructed from experimental data for the systems Sb2O4–NaSbO3, Sb2O4–KSbO3, and Sb2O4–NaSbO3–NaF. The system Sb2O4–NaSbO3 contains only an intermediate pyrochlore type solid solution with a maximum melting point of 1490 °C at a Na:Sb atom ratio of 3:5. The Sb2O4–KSbO3 system contains in addition to the pyrochlore phase a compound 3K2O • 5Sb2O5 which melts congruently at about 1450 °C and two polymorphs of K2O • 2Sb2O5. The low temperature form of K2O • 2Sb2O5 was found to be monoclinic P21/c with a = 7.178, b = 13.378, c = 11.985 A, β = 124°10′. The melting point of Sb2O4 was found to be 1350 ± 5 °C and NaSbO3 and KSbO3 both melt congruently at 1555 ± 5 °C and 1410 ± 5 °C respectively. The previously reported cubic form of KSbO3 was found to be a K+ deficient phase stabilized by reaction with atmospheric moisture. A similar cubic phase which appears to be a good Na+ ion conductor can be synthesized in the ternary system NaSbO3–Sb2O4–NaF.

Keywords: Alkali antimonates, crystal growth, ionic conductors, potassium antimonate, sodium antimonate, sodium antimony oxyfluoride

1. Introduction

The search for potential candidates for ionic conductors together with the lack of detailed phase equilibrium data has served as an impetus to investigate the alkali antimonate systems.

In the system Na2O–Sb2O4–O2 the compound NaSbO3 was reported to occur by Schrewelius [1]1 and to be hexagonal with an ilmenite structure, a = 5.316, c = 15.95 A. A pyrochlore solid solution was found to occur by Steward and Knop [2]. No melting data was previously reported.

In the system K2O–Sb2O4–O2 the compound KSbO3 with an ilmenite structure has been previously reported by Spiegelberg [3]. A body centered cubic solid solution phase originally reported as KSbO3 [3] has been found to occur metastably in the system. The 3K2O:5Sb2O5 compound was originally reported by Aurivillius [4] and this phase, orthorhombic with a = 24.274, b = 7.157, c = 7.334 A, space group Pbam and the new compound K2O:2Sb2O5, monoclinic with a = 19.473, b = 7.452, c = 7.198 A, β = 94 °54.4′ space group C2/m were reported by H.Y–P Hong [5].

Two stable polymorphs of Sb2O4 have been reported in the literature. They are α–Sb2O4 which is orthorhombic [6] a = 5.436, b = 11.76 and c = 4.81 A and β–Sb2O4 which is monoclinic [7] a = 11.905, b = 4.834, c = 5.383 A, β = 101°22′. In the following discussion all ratios (1:3, 3:5, etc.) refer to the alkali/metal atom ratio rather than to the particular starting material that may have been used.

2. Specimen Preparation and Test Methods

In order to minimize the effect of foreign anion contamination in Sb2O4, high purity antimony metal was ground and oxidized on Pt setters in air at elevated temperatures. It was found that the formation of a thin antimony oxide coating at 450 °C prevented further surface reaction of antimony with the platinum. Once this coating was formed the temperature could be raised to 500 °C for relatively rapid oxidation without reaction with the platinum setter. Spectrographs analysis of Sb2O4 indicated that platinum contamination was only 2 ppm. The only other metals found in quantities greater than the detectable limit were traces of Zr and Tb.

Mixtures of Sb2O4 with sodium or potassium carbonate were prepared by weighing to the nearest ±0.1 mg in sufficient quantities to yield a 1 g batch. No corrections were made for percentage purity except loss on ignition. Each batch was hand mixed under acetone with a mortar and pestle. The mixtures were placed on setters fabricated from platinum foil and calcined in air at 500 °C for 60 hs. Following this preliminary calcine the mixtures received a second calcine at 700 °C for 60 hs. In the K2O–Sb2O4 system the specimens received a third calcining at higher temperatures in a small platinum tube for 1 h. To minimize volatility at higher temperatures, sealed platinum tubes approximately 2 cm long were employed for all succeeding experiments unless otherwise stated. About one-third of the volume was occupied by the specimen and the remainder of the tube was flattened prior to sealing. At elevated temperatures the expansion of the flattened portion of the tube provided the necessary additional volume for expansion of the vapors without rupture. The actual pressure inside the tube is unknown. At elevated temperatures the time of the experiment was shortened to minimize “soaking in” of Sb2O4 into the platinum. By employing this procedure it was felt that the best approach to equilibrium was achieved. Sub-solidus and melting point values were obtained by quenching specimens sealed in platinum tubes and examining them at room temperature.

An electrically heated vertical tube furnace was used for quenching. The temperature was controlled to about ±2 °C. Temperatures were measured with a Pt versus Pt 10 percent Rh thermocouple which was calibrated several times during the course of the work. Due to the marked volatility of the antimonates and the reactivity of the alkaline materials at elevated temperatures, thermocouple contamination sometimes resulted. To minimize this contamination problem the thermocouples were changed frequently. The overall accuracy of the reported temperature is estimated to be about ±5 °C.

The first sign of glazing of the specimen surface established the solidus values. The few liquidus values that are reported were established by the formation of a concave meniscus. No attempt was made to obtain liquidus values in the Sb2O4-rich portion of these systems because of the high vapor pressure.

Equilibrium is generally considered to have been obtained when x-ray diffraction patterns of specimens successively heated for longer times and/or at higher temperatures show no change. X-ray powder diffraction patterns were made using a high angle recording Geiger counter diffractometer and nickel-filtered copper radiation with a scan rate of 1/4° 2θ/min and a chart speed of 1/4 in/min. The unit cell dimensions reported can be considered accurate to about ±5 in the last decimal place listed.

3. The System Sb2O4–NaSbO3

The system between the compositional limits of NaSbO3 and Sb2O4 has been examined in detail. The phase equilibrium diagram, figure 1, has been constructed from the data given in table 1. When Sb2O4 is reacted at low temperature (500–1000 °C) with alkali carbonate it generally loses CO2 and gains oxygen from the atmosphere to satisfy the equilibrium conditions of the phases formed, which may involve oxidation of the antimony ions. It is therefore understood that the phase diagrams determined in the antimonate systems reported here may not be strictly binary.

Figure 1. Phase equilibrium diagram for the system Sb2O4–NaSbO3.

Figure 1

Not necessarily a true binary system. L = liquid, S = solid, V = vapor, S1 = α − Sb2O4, S2 = pyrochlore. ●—melting

×—no melting

Table 1.

Experimental data for compositions in the system sodium antimonate-antimony tetroxide

Composition Heat Treatmenta/ Results
Na2O mol% Sb2O4 mol% Temp °C Time hr Physical Observation X-ray Diffraction Analysisb/
  50   50 1213 not melted
1264 3 NaSbO3
1435 1
1484 1
1502 .08
1542 .08 NaSbO3 + unknown
1569 .08 melted
1602 .08
  45   55 1000 48 not melted
1100 48 NaSbO3 + pyrochlore ss
1473 .25
1488 .08 partially melted
1495 .08 completely melted
  40   60 1102 20 not melted pyrochlore ss + NaSbO3
1305 19 ″    ″
1430 .08
1470 .08
1488 .08
1495 .03 completely melted
  37.5   62.5 (3:5) 1100 48 not melted Pyrochlore ss
1192 1
1306 19 pyrochlore ss
1326 20
1351 1
1373 2 not melted (reheat of 1100–4) pyrochlore ss
1391 2 not melted
1392 .16 pyrochlore ss
1412 .16
1447 .16
1454 .33
1458 .08
1464 .08
1476 .08
1487 .08
1490 .08 melted
  33.33   66.67 (1:2) 1000c/ 8 not melted
1009d/   168 pyrochlore ss
1100 3
1103e/ 91
1287 2
1292 1.5
1306 24
1307 19 pyrochlore ss
1316 .5
1317 3.5
1354 .75 pyrochlore ss
1360 24
1376 .5
1378 .5
1411 19
1418 .02
1437 24 partially melted
1475 .02 completely melted
  25   75 (1:3)   750 60 not melted pyrochlore ss + unknownf/
  800 60 pyrochlore ss + unknowng/
  800 60 pyrochlore ss + unknownf/
  800   336 pyrochlore ss + unknown
1098 16 pyrochlore ss
1192 1
1200 24
1220 2
1277 2
1306 24
1307 .08
1317 16h/ pyrochlore ss
1325 1
1339 .08
1345 .25 pyrochlore ss
1346 .08
1358 .08
1377 .02 partially melted pyrochlore ss + NaSbO3
1427 .02
  23   77 1200 24 not melted pyrochlore ss + β–Sb2O4
1266 4 pyrochlore + α + βi/
1267 19 pyrochlore ssi/
1299 .08
1304 .08
1313 .08
1322 .08
1332 .08 pyrochlore ssi/
1338 .08
  20   80 1099   672 not melted pyrochlore ssk/
1107   144
1200 24 not melted pyrochlore ss + α
1220 2.5 pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4
1234 2.5 ″    ″
1277 16 pyrochlore ss + β-Sb2O4
1301 .5 not melted
1305 19 NaSbO3k/
1306 24 pyrochlore ss + β-Sb2O4
1314 .08 pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4
1318 .08
1335 .08
1339 .2
1340 .08
1345 .2 partially melted
1362 .5
  15   85   800 74 not melted unknown + pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4g,l/
  800 60 α + pyrochlore ss + unknownl/
1000 64 unknown + tr α-Sb2O4 (dried 240)k,l/
1000 64 unknown + tr α-Sb2O4k,l/
1007 48 not melted pyrochlore + α-Sb2O4 + unknownl/
1107   144 pyrochlore ss + a-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4
1200 24
1200 60 pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4
1337 .2
1340 .2
1348 .2 partially melted
  10   90   800 74 not melted α-Sb2O4 + unknownl/
1007 48 α-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ssl/
1107   144 ″  ″  ″
1234 2 α-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ss
1281 .33 ″   ″
1290 .33
1300 .33 α-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ss
1311 .2
1319 .33
1334 .33
1337 .2 α-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ss
1351 1 partially melted α + pyrochlore ss + quenched liquidm/
  5   95 1007 48 not melted β-Sb2O4 + α-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ssi/
1107   144 α-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore ss + trace β-Sb2O4i/
β-Sb2O4l/
1234 3.5 ″  ″  ″  ″  
a/

All specimens were preheated to 750°C for 60 hours and 1200°C for 19 hours unless otherwise footnoted. Rate of heating and cooling was approximately 3°/min. For higher heat treatments, speciments were heated in sealed Pt tubes and quenched from temperatures indicated.

b/

The phases identified are given in the order of the amount present (greatest amount first) at room temperature. These phases are not necessarily those present at the temperature to which the specimen was heated.

c/

Specimen heated with PtO2 at 68,900 psi in sealed Pt tube.

d/

Specimen heated in sealed Pt tube at 5,000 psi.

e/

Specimen previously heated at 1292°C for 1.5 hours.

f/

Specimen heated in sealed Pt tube in presence of water. The unknown phase formed is probably a hydrate.

g/

Specimen heated in sealed Pt tube in PtO2.

h/

Specimen heated in presence of 5:95 Na2O:Sb2O4 which served as a buffer.

i/

In spite of extensive x-ray study it has not been determined which of the polymorphic forms of Sb2O4 is the stable form.

j/

Sb2O4 probably soaked into Pt container and the composition changed to pyrochlore ss.

k/

Platinum tube leaked.

l/

Unknown phase, d-spacing of major lines given in text. This phase is probably a hydrated phase which exists in the presence of moisture and/or PtO2 and can be eliminated by an additional calcining of 1200°C for several hours. Once eliminated this phase does not appear to reform at lower temperatures in laboratory time.

m/

Specimen contained non-equilibrium material derived from a liquid when quenched from above the liquidus and examined at room temperature.

The compound NaSbO3 (ilmenite-type) was found in this work to melt at about 1555 ± 5 °C. An intermediate pyrochlore solid solution exists from about 37.5 mol percent Na2O:62.5 mol percent Sb2O4 to 24 mol percent Na2O:76 mol percent Sb2O4 at 1350 °C. The 1:3 composition probably does not really correspond structurally to [NaSb+3]Sb2+5O7 although the 3:5 composition may be written as [Na1.5Sb0.5+3]Sb2+5O6.5—see section 6.1. The 3Na2O: 5Sb2O4 composition apparently melts congruently at 1490 ± 5 °C. The solidus curve falls from this temperature to about 1340 ± 5 °C at 24 mol percent Na2O:76 mol percent Sb2O4. A two phase region exists between the pyrochlore solid solution and Sb2O4. An unknown phase was found to occur in the system which could be made approximately single phase by calcining the composition 15 mol percent Na2O:85 mol percent Sb2O4 at 750 °C and reheating in a sealed Pt tube to 1000 °C for 64 h in the presence of PtO2. This phase has an as yet unindexed x-ray diffraction pattern with the four strongest lines occurring at d values equal to 2.283, 2.798, 3.453, 8.23 A.

In the Sb2O4 rich portion of the system from 10 percent Na2O (or K2O):90 percent Sb2O4 to 100 percent Sb2O4 experimental interpretation at or near the liquidus is exceedingly difficult since the conventional picture of solid and liquid is not evident. At the composition 15 mol percent Na2O (or K2O): 85 mol percent Sb2O4, quenched liquid plus solid is evident. From this data the solidus can be delineated. However at or near Sb2O4, the solid appears to transform to vapor with no indication of the liquid phase. The most likely interpretation of the data is shown in the circular insert in figure 1, indicating that solid Sb2O4 + solid pyrochloress melts to solid pyrochloress and liquid. Within experimental error, the sublimation and eutectic points appear to be at the same temperature and the field Sb2O4 + Liq (labeled S1 + L) is not seen.

3.1. NaSbO3

The compound NaSbO3 was first reported by Schrewelius [1] to be hexagonal, a = 5.316 and c = 15.95 A with an ilmenite structure. This compound was found in the present work to melt congruently at about 1555 ± 5°C. No other stable polymorphs were encountered.

3.2. Pyrochlore Solid Solution

One intermediate phase, a cubic pyrochlore solid solution was characterized in the system. The compositional range varies from approximately Na2O:3Sb2O4 to 3Na2O:5Sb2O4 with unit cell dimensions varying from 10.289 to 10.286 A respectively. Since the pyrochlore is a tunnel structure and this pyrochlore is the only sodium containing pyrochlore reported that can be formulated by direct synthesis it was worthy of further study as a possible ionic conductor. For ionic conductivity measurements dense materials were needed and several experiments were conducted with Na2O:2Sb2O4 in an effort to determine the stability of the pyrochlore solid solution under high pressure and temperature. Samples in sealed platimun tubes were heated at 1100 °C and 4000–5000 psi 2 for several hours. The resulting specimens are single phase pyrochlore which appear to be very dense. The average density of four measured fragments was 5.26 ± 0.05 g/cm3.

For ionic conductivity measurements, pellets of Na2O:2Sb2O4 (1.9 cm in diameter) were placed in sealed platinum foil envelopes and hot pressed by a commercial company at 1100°C and 5,000 psi. The pellets were single phase material with a density of 96 percent theoretical (see sec. 6.1). The ionic conductivity of these pellets was measured at NASA Lewis Research Center [8] and they were found to be essentially insulators.

The distribution of the various ions (i.e., Na+, Sb+3, Sb+5, O−2) in the Na2O:2Sb2O4 specimen is currently being determined at NBS from single crystal structure analysis. Until the results of this analysis are forthcoming it may be assumed that the “lone pair” electrons associated with Sb+3 will not allow the passage of Na+ through the channels.

3.3. Polymorphism of Sb2O4

Two stable polymorphs of Sb2O4 have been reported in the literature. They are α-Sb2O4, which is orthorhombic [6], a = 5.436, b = 11.76, c = 4.810 A and β-Sb2O4, which is monoclinic [7], a = 11.905, b = 4.834, c = 5.383 A and β = 101°22′. From table 2a it can readily be seen that specimens quenched from a temperature-composition region represented on the phase diagram, figure 1, as Sb2O4+ pyrochlore may contain either α-Sb2O4 and/or β-Sb2O4 when quenched from high temperatures and ambient pressures and examined at room temperature. From this seemingly inconsistent data it would appear that α-Sb2O4 and β-Sb2O4 have a polytypic relationship. To help resolve this problem a high resolution electron microscope study should be done.

Table 2a.

Experimental data for polymorphism in antimony tetroxide

Composition Heat Treatment Environment Results
Starting Material Temp °C Time hr Physical Observation X-ray Diffraction Analysisa/
α-Sb2O4 1223   .5 sealed Pt tube not melted α + tr β
 ″   .″ unsealed Pt tube α
β-Sb2O4 1223   .5 sealed Pt tube not melted β + tr α
 ″   ″ unsealed Pt tube volatilized
β-Sb2O4 1223 2 sealed Pt tube not melted β + tr α
α-Sb2O4 sealed Pt tube α + Sb2O3
α-Sb2O4 1303 19 sealed Pt tube not melted β + α
β-Sb2O4 β
α-Sb2O4 1327   .08 sealed Pt tube not melted α + β
β-Sb2O4   ″ β + α
α-Sb2O4 1330   .25 sealed Pt tube not melted β + α
α-Sb2O4 1339   .08 sealed Pt tube not melted α + β
β-Sb2O4   ″ β + α
β-Sb2O4 1345   .08 sealed Pt tube not melted β + α
α-Sb2O4 1350   .08 sealed Pt tube melted (vapor soaked into Pt)
β-Sb2O4 1350   .08 sealed Pt tube melted? large tabular vapor grown crystals
α-Sb2O4b/ 1200   – high temperature x-ray α (starting material remained a up to 1200°C)
α-Sb2O4c/   750   24 open tray α
 ″   800   ″
 ″   900   ″ α + β
 ″   950   ″ ″ ″
a/

The phases identified are given in the order of the amount present (greatest amount first) at room temperature. These phases are not necessarily those present at the temperature to which the specimen was heated. α refers to α-Sb2O4 polymorph and β to the β-Sb2O4 polymorph.

b/

Material placed on platinum slide and heated and examined by x-ray diffraction at various temperatures.

c/

Poorly crystalline as received Sb2O4 was heated 750°C - 24 hours and the same specimen which was never ground was reheated at 800°C - 24 hours, then 900°C - 64 hours and finally 950°C - 24 hours.

From the data in table 2b it appears that the β form is the equilibrium high pressure form of Sb2O4. Insufficient data have been collected to establish if an equilibrium boundary curve exists between α-Sb2O4 and β-Sb2O4 at various temperatures and pressures. When specimens are sealed and heated under pressure in the presence of PtO2 in either Pt or Au tubes single phase β-Sb2O4 is obtained. However when heated under pressure without the PtO2, a two phase specimen results, β-Sb2O4 and the dense high pressure form of Sb2O3 (valentinite). A similar polytypic relationship probably exists for the two polymorphs of Sb2O3.

Table 2b.

Experimental high pressure data for polymorphism in anlimony-tetroxide

Composition Starting Material Heat Treatment Environment Pressure psi Resultsb/
X-ray Diffraction Analysis
Temp °C Time hrs
α-Sb2O4a/ 700 24 Sealed Au tube 88,000 βc/ + Sb2O3d/
750 48 59,680 ″  ″   ″
750 96 73,200 ″  ″   ″
750 16 89,400 β + trace Sb2O3
751 116 109,000 β + Sb2O3
760 96 Sealed Au tube with PtO2 80,000 β
766 96 Sealed Au tube 88,000 β + Sb2O3
775 115 Pt 47,500 α + Sb2O3
775 48 Pt 54,760 β + Sb2O3
775 48 Pt 66,500 ″ ″   ″
800 24 Au 93,000 ″ ″   ″
800 24 Sealed Au tube with PtO2 105,000 β
850 16 Sealed Au tube 82,500 β + Sb2O3
900 72 Sealed Pt tube with PtO2 104,000 β
β + Sb2O4 900 72 ″ ″ ″ ″ ″ 104,000 β
a/

α–Sb2O4 prepared by the oxidation of Sb at 530°C on Pt tray. This material was reheated at 800°C - 60 hr.

b/

The phases identified are given in the order of the amount present (greatest amount first) at room temperature. These phases are not necessarily those present at the temperatures to which the specimen was heated.

c/

β form of Sb2O4.

d/

High pressure form of Sb2O3 (valentinite).

4. The System Sb2O4–KSbO3

This system has been examined between the compositional limits of KSbO3 and Sb2O4. The results are given in the data presented in table 3 from which the phase relationships have been established as shown in figure 2.

Table 3.

Experimental data for compositions in the system potassium antimonaie antimony tetroxide

Composition Heat Treatmenta/ Results
K2O Mol % Sb2O4 Mol % Temp °C Time hr Physical Observation X-ray Diffraction Analysisb/
  5 95 950 60 not melted pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4
1168 48 α-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4 + pyrochlore sse/
  10 90 950 60 not melted pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4c/
1168 48   ″  ″  ″
  15 85 853 24 not melted
950 60 pyrochlore ss
966 4
1168 48 pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4
1200 19 pyrochlore ss + α-Sb2O4 + β-Sb2O4
  20 80 950 60 not melted pyrochlore ss
1168 48   ″
  25 75 950 60 not melted P21/cd/ + pyrochlore ss
1179 48 pyrochlore ss
1361 .08
1375 .08 partially melted pyrochlore ss
1385 .08
1403 .08 completely melted
  30 70 950 60 not melted P21/cd/ + pyrochlore ss
1178 48 1:2 + pyrochlore ss
1366 .08
1380 .08 partially melted pyrochlore ss + 3:5
1382 .08
1399 .08 completely melted
  33.33 66.67 950 60 not melted 3:5 + P21/cd/
950 64
998 70 P21/cd/
1050 168
1050e/ 168
1102 1 1:2c/ + 3:5 + pyrochlore ss + P21/c
1106 64 1:2c/ + 3:5 + pyrochlore
1106f/ 64 1:2 + 3:5
1160f/ 1 3:5 + pyrochlore ss
1179 48 1:2 + 3:5 + pyrochlore ss
1214f/ 1 3:5 + pyrochlore ss
1214 2  ″   ″
  35 65 950 60 not melted pyrochlore + 3:5 + pyrochlore ss
1178 48 1:2 + 3:5
1380 .08 partially melted 3:5 + pyrochlore
1397 .08
1409 .08 completely melted
  37.5 62.5 950 60 not melted
1174 88
1195 19 3:5
1208 1 3:5 + trace cubic
950e/ 64
1310 45 3:5 + trace 1:1g/
1352 .08
1379 .08
1399 .08 completely melted
1416 .08
  40 60 950 60 not melted
1174 88 3:5 + cubic
1208 1  ″  ″
1295e/ 20 3:5 + 1:1
1362e/ .5  ″  ″
1375e/ .08 partially melted
  45 55 950 60 not melted 1:1 + cubic + P21/c
1174 88 cubic +3:5
1208 1 3:5 + cubic
1311e/ 1 3:5 + 1:1
  46 54 1200h/ 1 not melted cubic +3:5
  47 53 1194h/ 3 not melted cubic + trace 3:5
1200 1 cubic
  47.5 52.5 1212h/ 88 not melted cubic + 3:5 + 1:1
1218h/ 17 cubic + 1:1 + 3:5
1310g,h/ 45 1:1
  48 52 1198 3 not melted cubic
1200 1  ″
1200i/ 1;5 cubic +3:5 ilmenite
1308 .5 1:1
1103c/ 1 cubic + ilmenite + pyrochlore
1103i/ 3 ilmenite + pyrochlore
  49 51 1200 1 not melted cubic
  50 50 750 70 not melted
800 24
921 1
946 21 ilmenite
950 60  ″
1103 1  ″
1104 22  ″
1150 1  ″
1174 88  ″
1194 1  ″
1202 1  ″
1214 1  ″
1298 .5  ″
1363 .5  ″
1403 .08  ″
1421 .08 melted
1426 .08
a/

All specimens were preheated to 500 and 700°C for 60 hours unless otherwise footnoted. Rate of heating and cooling were approximately 3°/min. Specimens were heated in sealed Pt tubes and quenched from temperatures indicated.

b/

The phases identified are given in order of the amount present (greatest amount first) at room temperature. These phases are not necessarily those present at the temperature to which the specimen was heated.

1:2 – K2O • 2Sb2O5; 3:5 – 3K2O • 5Sb2O5 and 1:1 – KSbO3 – ilmenite structure.

c/

Non-equilibrium mixture – see Discussion in text.

d/

The phase was indexed from single crystal x-ray precession data which has shown the compound is monoclinic space group P21/c a = 7.178, b = 13.378, c = 11.985, β = 124°10′.

e/

This specimen was previously heated to 500°, 700° and 1200°C – 19 hours in a sealed Pt tube.

f/

Specimen heated in open Pt tube.

g/

Specimen leaked and changed composition.

h/

Composition prepared from a mixture 1:1 and 3:5 – see text for explanation.

i/

Specimen calcined and examined by x-ray diffraction while in form of pellet.

Figure 2. Phase equilibrium diagram for the system Sb2O4–KSbO3.

Figure 2

Not necessarily a true binary system

○—melting

×—no melting

ss—solid solution

1:2—K2O:2Sb2O5

3:5—3K2O:5Sb2O5

P21/c—lower temperature form of K2O:2Sb2O5

4.1. Compounds in the System

The compound KSbO3 with an ilmenite structure a = 5.361, c = 18.213, was previously reported [3] and was found in this work to melt congruently at 1420±5°C. A body centered cubic solid solution phase originally reported as KSbO3 [3] has been found to occur metastably at about 47.5 percent K2O. The 3K2O:5Sb2O5 compound was found to melt congruently at about 1450 °C. The K2O:2Sb2O1 compound was found to have a phase transition at about 1000 °C and to dissociate to pyrochlore plus 3K2O:5Sb2O5 at about 1150 °C. The low temperature form of K2O:2Sb2O5, labeled P21/c, represents a monoclinic phase with a = 7.178, b = 13.378, c = 11.985 A and β = 124°10′. Single crystals of this phase were grown by flux evaporation from the composition 50K2O:5Sb2O4:45MoO3. The unit cell and space group were determined from these crystals and confirmed by least square indexing of the powder diffraction pattern of the low temperature form of the compound K2O:2Sb2O5. The pyrochlore solid solution exists at 1150°C from about 15 mol percent K2O:85 mol percent Sb2O4 to greater than 30 mol percent K2O:70 mol percent Sb2O4. The melting characteristics of these phases have been partially determined as shown in table 3 and figure 2.

4.2 Hydroxyl Ion Stabilization of Cubic Potassium Antimonate

The compound KSbO3 was reported previously as being cubic at ambient conditions after treatment at high temperatures and pressures [9].

In the current work, occasional small amounts of a cubic phase were seen in the x-ray powder diffraction pattern of KSbO3 ilmenite heated at ambient pressure. For these reasons, specimens of 1:1 and 3:5 mol ratios K2O:Sb2O4 were equilibrated in air at 750 °C for 60 h to oxidize and form the phases KSbO3 and K3Sb5O14 and then reheated for 1 h at 1200°C to drive off all excess moisture. X-ray diffraction patterns of these specimens showed single phase ilmentite and the 3K2O:5Sb2O5 compound. Portions of these 1200°C calcines were then weighed and mixed in acetone in the appropriate ratios to yield compositions of 46, 47, 47.5, 48 and 49 mol percent K2O. Each of these specimens was dried at 240°C for 1 h and heated in open Pt tubes at 1200°C for 1 h. Only the x-ray pattern of the 46 percent specimen showed a small amount of 3K2O:5Sb2O5, the others contained only the cubic phase. A new specimen of of 48 mol percent K2O was prepared in the same way except the Pt tube was sealed. After 1 h at 1200 °C, the x-ray pattern of the specimen showed only about 50 percent cubic. A new specimen of 48 percent K2O was prepared by weighing the 1:1 and 3:5 phases immediately after removal from the 1200 °C furnace and sealing the material in a flattened Pt tube within 1–2 min. This tube was then inflated at 1200 °C for a few minutes and the material mixed by shaking in a “wiggle-bug.” The sealed specimen was then heated for 64 h at 1200 °C. The resultant specimen had exceedingly large grain growth indicating considerable solid state recrystallization but showed no cubic phase. The conclusion is inescapable that access to atmospheric moisture is probably necessary for the formation of the cubic phase at atmospheric pressure.

A paper entitled “Flux Synthesis of Cubic Antimonates” was published by the present authors during the course of this work [10]. In addition to the discovery that the F ion stabilized the formation of the body centered cubic phase of potassium antimonate it was disclosed that the cubic antimonate could also be obtained by reacting KSbO3 with a small amount of other cations with small radii like B+3, Si+4, etc. It now appears obvious that in this reaction the boron or silicon (etc.) actually ties up some of the K+ ion in a second phase and allows the K+ deficient antimonate to react with atmospheric moisture to form the cubic antimonate previously thought to be “KSbO3.”

5. The Systems of NaSbO3 With Additions

5.1. The System NaSbO3-NaF

To determine if NaF additions will stabilize the body-centered cubic phase, similar to the 6KSbO3: KF-phase [10], NaF was added to NaSbO3 in the ratio of 3NaSbO3:NaF, 4NaSbO3:NaF, 5NaSbO3: NaF and 6NaSbO3:NaF. After heating at 750 °C and 1000 °C in sealed Pt tubes, the x-ray patterns showed only ilmenite and NaF, however after heating at ~1150 °C all the compositions contained some body centered cubic-type phase. The compositions 3NaSbO3:NaF and 4NaSbO3:NaF, when heated in sealed Pt tubes at ~1250 °C, did not contain ilmenite and appeared to be the closest to single phase cubic. The small crystals of 4NaSbO3:NaF prepared by quenching in a small sealed tube appeared to be well-formed truncated octahedrons. However, the room temperature x-ray diffraction pattern of the material had somewhat diffuse lines, with the exception of the h00 lines which were reasonably sharp, suggesting rhombohedral symmetry. This material was placed on a hot stage microscope slide and analyzed by x-ray diffraction from room temperature up to 220 °C. At 190 °C the material appeared to start to go cubic and by 220 °C a good quality cubic x-ray diffraction pattern was obtained (a = 9.353 A). When the material was cooled to room temperature the symmetry was again non-cubic. As the h00 lines deteriorate somewhat on cooling, the true symmetry of the room temperature form is probably no higher than monoclinic or triclinic rather than rhombohedral. It was therefore not unreasonable to expect that a body centered cubic phase could be obtained by direct synthesis with NaF without the necessity for Na+ ion exchange.

5.2. The Ternary System NaSbO3:Sb2O4:NaF

X-ray diffraction patterns (single crystal and powder) of selected NaF-flux synthesized [11] washed crystals show only a truly cubic body centered phase (a = 9.334 A). It must be postulated that the composition formed by this technique is slightly different from that made essentially single phase at 4NaSbO3:NaF in a sealed tube. In an attempt to obtain a fluorine-substituted body centered cubic phase which exists at room temperature the compositions shown in table 4 were prepared and show the reported phases when quenched from 1250 °C. Equilibrium was not obtained in overnight heat treatments at 1200 °C. At 1350 °C the body centered cubic phase started to decompose. The composition 68NaSbO3:4Sb2O4:28NaF (mol %) was chosen as the best composition for further studies on ceramic procedures [11]. The phases found in the specimens heated at ~1250 °C are summarized in “equilibrium” diagrams for the quaternary system NaSbO3–Sb2O3–Sb2O5–NaF (fig. 3) and the ternary plane of this system NaSbO3–Sb2O4–NaF (fig. 4).

Table 4.

Experimental data for the ternary system NaSbO3–Sb2O4–NaF

Composition Mol% Heat Treatmenta/ X-ray Analysis
Temp °C Time hr
NaSbO3 75.08
Sb2O4 3.15 1250 19   single phase distorted cubic
NaF 21.77
NaSbO3 67.79
Sb2O4 6.25 1250 19   body centered cubic + pyrochlore + ilmenite
NaF 25.96
NaSbO3 53.50
Sb2O4 12.34 1250 19   body centered cubic + pyrochlore + sodium fluoride
NaF 34.16
NaSbO3 39.59
Sb2O4 18.27 1250 19   body centered cubic + pyrochlore + sodium fluoride
NaF 42.14
NaSbO3 69.05
Sb2O4 2.90 1250 19   body centered cubic + trace sodium fluoride
NaF 28.05
NaSbO3 49.28
Sb2O4 11.37 1250 19   pyrochlore + body centered cubic + sodium fluoride
NaF 39.35
NaSbO3 31.20
Sb2O4 28.87 1250 19   pyrochlore + sodium fluoride
NaF 39.93
NaSbO3 84.62
Sb2O4 1268 19   ilmenite + cubic
NaF 15.38
NaSbO3 74.42
Sb2O4 2.32 1261 1   distorted cubic + ilmenite
NaF 23.26 1268 19   distorted cubic + NaF
NaSbO3 70.00
Sb2O4 3.33 1264 1   cubic + ilmenite
NaF 26.67
NaSbO3 65.96
Sb2O4 4.26 1266 1   cubic + ilmenite
NaF 29.78 1267 19   cubic + NaF
NaSbO3 62.96
Sb2O4 4.94 1266 1   cubic + NaF
NaF 32.10 1267 19   cubic + NaF
NaSbO3 58.82
Sb2O4 5.89 1267 19   cubic + NaF
NaF 35.29
1000 1   ilmenite + trace NaF
NaSbO3 68.00 1252 16   cubic + trace ilmenite
Sb2O4 4.00 1265 .1   cubic + NaF
NaF 28.00 1265 1.5 cubic + NaF
1265 72   cubic + NaF
a/

Preheated at 750°C for 60 hours open.

Figure 3. Phase relations in the quaternary system NaSbO3–Sb2O3–Sb2O5–NaF.

Figure 3

The join 6:1—3:4 represents the formula
[2+xNa14xF2][Sb12+5O36xFx].
The join 6:1—3:7 represents the formula
[2Na14F2][Sby+3Sb12y+5O36(x+2y)F(x+2y)]

Figure 4. Phase relations in the ternary system NaSbO3–Sb2O4–NaF.

Figure 4

The join 6:1—3:4 represents the formula
[2+xNa14xF2][Sb12+5O36xFx]
The join 6:1—3:7 represents the formula
[2Na14F2][Sby+3Sb12+5O36(x+2y)F(x+2y)]
The join 3:1—3:8 represents the formula
[Na16F2][Sb2+x+3Sb10x+5O342xF2+2x]+O2.

6. Relation of Structural Mechanisms of Non-Stoichiometry to Ionic Conductivity

It is probably generally accepted that a phase which exhibits unusual ionic conductivity must necessarily be structurally non-stoichiometric. Unfortunately the opposite is not necessarily true. Nevertheless a crystallographic understanding of non-stoichiometric phases is an obvious necessity to the tailoring of new alkali ion conductors. For this reason it is worthwhile to discuss the nature of the non-stoichiometry which has been observed in this study for those phases which seem to be of interest.

6.1. Pyrochlore Phases

In the KTaO3–WO3 system a pyrochlore phase occurs at about the 1:1 ratio or K1.0[TaW]O6 [11, 12]. Unfortunately, the pyrochlore in this system transforms to a tetragonal tungsten bronze (TTB) at high termperatures. Although it can be ion exchanged with Na+ to produce an ion conducting pyrochlore phase, this phase is not stable above about 450 °C [11]. The only stable Na+ containing pyrochlore is the one in the Sb2O4–NaSbO4 system and apparently this one is not a good ionic conductor.

The distribution of Na+, Sb+3, Sb+5 and O−2 ions in a pyrochlore single crystal is currently under evaluation by the Crystallography Section at NBS. However, certain assumptions can be made which may enable us to postulate the approximate distribution. The formula for the compositions observed to result in a pyrochlore structure night be postulated to be [NaSb+3]Sb2O7 for the Na/Sb ratio of 1:3 [Na1.33Sb0.67+3]Sb2O6.67 for 1:2, and [Na1.5Sb0.5]Sb2O6.5 for 3:5. However, these compositions do not illustrate the structural nature of pyrochlore nor account for the observation that the “lone pair” electrons associated with Sb+3 will not allow O−2 ions to completely coordinate the antimony and result in apparent vacancies.

The structural formula of pyrochlore should be written as [A2X][B2X6] to emphasize the fact that the octahedral network of B2X6 is required to be complete if the structure is to be stable. The A2X ions fill the intersecting channels in this B2X6 framework. In our material the B2X6 framework must be represented as [Sb2+5O6]−2 and must be stoichiometric. All remaining Na+ and O−2 ions, as well as Sb+3, must be in the [A2X]+2 portion of the formula. All Sb+5 must be in B2X6 and only Sb+3 in A2X. Furthermore the maximum number of the sum of Na+1, Sb+3, excess O−2 (beyond O6−2) and “lone pair” electrons cannot exceed three. One can then write the general formula as [A2O]+2[Sb2O6]−2 with [A2O]+2 equal to

[Na2/k+1+Nax+1+Sbkx+3+Oy2+L.P.kx]3

where k equals the ratio Sb/Na. Using the ionic valences and the sum of the ions equal to three, maximum densities can be calculated and compared with the observed to test the structural hypothesis. The maximum density for the Na/Sb ratio of 1:3 represented by the formula

[Na0.917+1Sb0.75+3O0.58320.75]+2[Sb2+5O6]2

is calculated to be 5.469 g/cm3.

For the Na/Sb ratio of 3:5 with the formula

[Na+11.5Sb+30.5O20.50.5]+2[Sb2O6]2

the density is calculated as 5.406 g/cm3. For the intermediate composition with the Na/Sb ratio of 1:2 and a formula of [Na1.294+1Sb0.588+3O0.52920.588]+2[Sb2O6]2 the maximum density is found to be 5.481 g/cm3. The density found for our isostatically hot pressed specimens is 96.0 percent of the maximum theoretical density. It should be remembered however that the true theoretical density of any given Sb/Na ratio will decrease with decrease in temperature. Thus the densities obtained on our hot pressed specimens are, in all probability, greater than 96 percent of theoretical in view of the expected increased oxidation of the Sb at the relatively low temperatures involved.

6.2. Body Centered Cubic Antimonates

A successful method of synthesizing cubic potassium antimonate by heating in molten KF was published by the present authors [10]. The major reason for the success in obtaining completely single phase fluorine stabilized cubic potassium antimonate is that the KSbO3 ilmenite form is H2O soluble and may be easily separated from the cubic material.

An examination of the structural model of the octahedral framework of the body centered cubic antimonate phase suggests that this structure must always have some anion (X) occupancy in the 000 and 1/2 1/2 1/2 positions. The structural formula thus appears to be [A16X2]+12[Sb12O36]−12 with the alkali ion in position (A) located at (or just off) the juncture of the open cages. However, it seems very likely from both structural reasons (bond lengths, etc.) and valency considerations that either or both of the nonframework positions will be non-stoichiometric. Valency considerations require that at least two out of 16 alkali ions must be missing and the structural formula then becomes

[2A14X2]+12[Sb12O36]12

This formula corresponds to the composition reported by Goodenough, et al. [13] for the single crystal x-ray diffraction analyses of the phase synthesized with KF according to the NBS method [10]:

K12Sb12O36.2KF or[2K14F2]+12[Sb12O36]12.

It seems quite likely, however, that this general formula does not completely account for all of the preparations which have been observed to form this structure, whether body centered or primitive. The observation that a primitive phase can be formed, in air, by reaction with atmospheric moisture at a 48:52 ratio suggests that this phase may well have considerably less than 14 alkali ions per unit cell. The formula must be compensated, in this case, by a substitution of a monovalent anion [(OH), F] in the octahedral framework. The general formula then becomes [□2+xA14−xX2]+(12−x) [Sb12O36−x,Xx]−(12−x). The composition found at ~48:52 in the potassium antimonate system can be written (assuming a ratio of 11:12 K/Sb or 47.826% K2O):

K22Sb24O71+5H2OK22Sb24O66(OH)10

or

[5K11(OH)2]+9[Sb12O33(OH)3]9

which also can be described as 6KSbO3:3Sb2O5:5KOH The general formula describing the K+ containing compositions is then

[2+xK14xX2]+(12x)[Sb12+5O36xXx](12x).

The above formula contains only pentavalent antimony and apparently does not completely explain the compositions which form a “stable” body centered cubic phase in the system NaSbO3: Sb2O4+x:NaF. The only formula which does not involve the loss or gain of O−2 (or F) when the Sb2O4 is added in a sealed tube corresponds to:

[2Na14F2][Sby+3Sb12y+5O362yF2y]

which is represented by the join 6:1—3:7 on figures 3 and 4. There is really no place in the framework structure for Sb+3 and it is difficult to believe that octahedrally coordinated antimony can be Sb+3. However, for convenience, the formulas can be written involving Sb+3. The new formula would then have two variables:

[2+xA14xX2][Sby+3Sb12y+5O36(x+2y)X(x+2y)]

represented by the plane in the quaternary system NaSbO3:Sb2O3:Sb2O5:NaF bounded by the 6:1—3:4 and 6:1—3:7 joins of figures 3 and 4. However the single phase region in this system actually appears to contain more NaF than described by this general formula. Apparently some O2 is evolved in the sealed Pt tubes, the amount depending on uncontrolled variables such as the amount of free volume in the tube and on changes from the original composition during treatment. The absolute maximum amount of NaF which can be accommodated structurally by the body centered cubic phase can be described by the formula

[Na16F2]+14[Sb2x+3Sb10x+5O342xF2+2x]14

which represents a line in the system shown by the join 3:1—3:8 in figure 4 and involves the evolution of one molecule of gas (O2) per formula unit. The results of our investigations so far suggest that the body centered phase approaches this formula as a limit. The composition of the cubic phase in equilibrium with excess Sb2O4 and molten NaF actually appears to touch this line at approximately 10NaSbO3:Sb2O4:6NaF or

[Na16F2][Sb3+3Sb9+5O32F4]+O2.

The single phase distorted cubic material on the binary join NaSbO3:NaF appears to have a composition between 6:1 and 5:1 or approximately 11NaSbO3:2NaF or

[Na14.18F2][Sb12O35.818F0.1818]+0.0909O2.

The compositions in the quaternary system thus probably lie on a join between these two end members.

Footnotes

*

This work was supported in part by NASA Contract No. C-50821-C and a Shorter version of this paper has been included as part of the NASA Report NBSIR 75-754.

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

2

The use of psi, bar, and kbar follows the current common practice of workers in the field. Note that 1 bar ≡ 105 N/m2 (or pascal) ≡ 106 dyn/cm2 ≡ 0.9869 atm ≡ 14.504 psi. The accepted international standard (SI) unit of pressure is the pascal or newton per meter squared.

7. References

  • 1.Schrewelius N. Diss. Stockholm: 1943. p. 144. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stewart DJ, Knop O. Can J of Chem. 1970;48:1323. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Spiegelberg P. Ark f Kemi Mineral och Geol. 1940;14(5):1. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Aurivillius B. Ark f Kemi. 1964;25:505. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hong, H. Y-P., Preprint from Lincoln Lab, MIT, sponsored in part by NASA Contract C–43205–C (1974).
  • 6.Dihlstrom K, Anorg Z. Allg Cheim. 1938;239:57. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rogers D, Skapski AC. Proc Chem Soc. 1964:400. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Singer J, Fielder WL, Kautz HE, Fordyce JS. Bull Am Ceram Soc. 1975;54:454. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kafalas JA. In: Roth RS, Schneider SJ, editors. Solid State Chemistry; Proceedings 5th Materials Research Symposium; [Google Scholar]; Nat Bur Stand (US) Jul, 1972. pp. 287–293. (Spec. Publ. 364). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brower WS, Minor DB, Parker HS, Roth RS, Waring JL. Mater Res Bull. 1974;9:1045. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roth RS, Brower WS, Parker HS, Minor DB, Waring JL. NASA Report No. CR-134869, NBSIR 75-754. Apr, 1975. Available as 75-31909 from the National Technical Information Services, Springfield, VA 22161. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Roth RS, Parker HS, Brower WS, Minor DB. NASA Report No. CR-134599, NBSIR 74-440. Apr, 1974. Available as 74-20381 from the National Technical Information Services, Springfield, VA 22161. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Goodenough JB, Hong H Y-P, Kafalas JA. Ninth Monthly Report, NASA Contract C-43205-C. May, 1974. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES