Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2017 Feb 1;146:327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.004

Field strength dependence of grey matter R2* on venous oxygenation

Paula L Croal 1, Ian D Driver 1, Susan T Francis 1, Penny A Gowland 1,
PMCID: PMC5312785  EMSID: EMS71463  PMID: 27720821

Abstract

The relationship between venous blood oxygenation and change in transverse relaxation rate (ΔR2*) plays a key role in calibrated BOLD fMRI. This relationship, defined by the parameter β, has previously been determined using theoretical simulations and experimental measures. However, these earlier studies have been confounded by the change in venous cerebral blood volume (CBV) in response to functional tasks. This study used a double-echo gradient echo EPI scheme in conjunction with a graded isocapnic hyperoxic sequence to assess quantitatively the relationship between the fractional venous blood oxygenation (1−Yv) and transverse relaxation rate of grey matter (ΔR2GM*), without inducing a change in vCBV.

The results demonstrate that the relationship between ΔR2* and fractional venous oxygenation at all magnet field strengths studied was adequately described by a linear relationship. The gradient of this relationship did not increase monotonically with field strength, which may be attributed to the relative contributions of intravascular and extravascular signals which will vary with both field strength and blood oxygenation.

Keywords: Calibrated BOLD, fMRI, R2* quantification, Oxygenation, Hyperoxia

Highlights

  • We assess the relationship between grey matter R2* and venous oxygenation.

  • Isocapnic hyperoxia prevented confounding changes in cerebral blood volume.

  • A linear dependency is an appropriate assumption at 1.5, 3 and 7 T.

  • Intravascular/extravascular signal ratios will vary with both B0 and oxygenation.

1. Introduction

The blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal arises from the interplay between cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) consumption. However, the magnitude of the BOLD signal also depends on baseline physiological parameters such as cerebral blood volume (CBV), oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and haematocrit (Hct) (Kim et al., 2012; Levin et al., 2001; Lin et al., 1998). These parameters can vary for a given individual across repeated scan sessions, between healthy subjects, and in particular across patient groups. This results in variability in the magnitude of the BOLD signal, which can be minimised by using the calibrated BOLD signal to measure changes in the CMRO2 non-invasively. The original calibrated BOLD model of Davis et al. (1998) provides a non-invasive method to quantify the fractional change in cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2) by using the vasodilatory effect of hypercapnia to normalise the BOLD signal.

Current models of calibrated BOLD depend on the relationship between the apparent transverse relaxation rate (R2*) and concentration of deoxyhaemoglobin (dHb) in the blood, or fractional venous oxygenation (1−Yv) (Ogawa et al., 1993). The contribution to R2* from deoxygenated blood (Δ R2*) can be described as a function of venous CBV (vCBV) and blood concentration of dHb,

R2*=kvCBV[dHb]β (1)

where [dHb] is a function of OEF and Hct (Davis et al., 1998), and k is a constant incorporating properties such as vessel geometry, magnet field strength (B0) and blood-tissue susceptibility differences.

The parameter β has traditionally been predicted from Monte Carlo simulations and analytical models (Boxerman et al., 1995; He et al., 2007; Ogawa et al., 1993; Yablonskiy and Haacke, 1994). This involves modelling the microscopic magnetic field gradients between deoxygenated blood vessels and the surrounding diamagnetic tissue to estimate the resulting enhancement of the R2* decay rate. For the extravascular (EV) compartment, the result depends on whether the system is in the static dephasing regime (larger vessels, β →1) or the diffusive dephasing regime (smaller vessels, β→2). The vessel size limit where the transition between these regimes occurs reduces as B0 increases (Kennan et al., 1994), such that Monte Carlo simulations predict the widely accepted value of β=1.5 for a vascular network at 1.5 T, and β=1 at 7 T (Boxerman et al., 1995, Ogawa et al., 1993; Yablonskiy and Haacke, 1994). However, the reliability of these results depends on how realistic the model is. In particular, models should also consider the effect of changes in intravascular (IV) signal contributions due to concomitant changes in vCBV, for example due to vessel dilation in response to functional activation or hypercapnia, and vessel constriction in response to non-isocapnic hyperoxia. This IV contribution can be significant as the R2* of blood increases quadratically with increasing deoxygenation (Blockley et al., 2012, Li et al., 1998). At fields below 3 T the intravascular signal from the veins represents a significant fraction of the BOLD signal, estimated to be approximately 57% at 1.5 T, 36% at 3 T, and negligible at 7 T (Uludag et al., 2009, van der Zwaag et al., 2009), depending on echo time.

More recently, experimental measurements of β have been published (Driver et al., 2010, Rossi et al., 2012, van der Zwaag et al., 2009, Wise et al., 2013), which are in reasonable agreement with model-based predictions. However, while theoretical estimates may not fully account for intravascular (IV) signal contributions, experimental measurements to date have been subject to potential concomitant changes in vCBV, arising from vessel dilation in response to functional activation or hypercapnia, or vessel constriction in response to non-isocapnic hyperoxia.

This study aims to measure the relationship between fractional change in concentration of deoxyhaemoglobin in venous blood and grey matter R2*, without a confounding change in vCBV, using a dynamic isocapnic hyperoxic stimulus at 1.5, 3 and 7 T.

2. Material and methods

The study was approved by the University of Nottingham Medical School Ethics Committee and all subjects gave prior informed written consent. Eight healthy volunteers (aged 24–27 years, 5 male) participated in the study. MR data was collected on Philips Achieva systems at three B0s, a 1.5 T system with 8-channel SENSE receive coil, a 3 T system with 32-channel SENSE receive coil and a 7 T system with head volume transmit and 32-channel SENSE receive coil.

An isocapnic hyperoxic stimulus was delivered to subjects using a feed-forward, low gas flow system (RespirAct™, Thornhill Research Inc., Toronto, Canada) in which arterial blood gases were controlled by a prospective targeting system consisting of a computerized gas blender and sequential gas delivery breathing circuit. The system uses the method of Slessarev et al. (2007) to target end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2) and PO2 (PETO2) independently of each other and independent of breathing pattern (Fierstra et al., 2013). Subjects received medical air via the RespirAct™ until the respiratory challenge commenced. The respiratory paradigm consisted of three minutes of normocapnic (maintaining PETCO2 at resting levels) normoxia, followed by a 4 minute normocapnic linear increase in PETO2 to a maximum level of 500 mmHg (an approximate 8 mmHg increase in PETO2 with each breath), a linear decrease in PETO2 to return to baseline over 4 minutes while continuing to maintain normocapnia, and a final 1 minute of normocapnic normoxia. The total respiratory paradigm was thus 12 minutes in duration.

Double echo gradient echo EPI (GE-EPI) data were acquired throughout the respiratory paradigm. At all three magnet field strengths, five contiguous axial slices positioned superior to the ventricles were acquired, with an in-plane resolution of 2×2 mm3, 3 mm slice thickness, and field of view of 212×188×15 mm3, 212×184×15 mm3 and 192×192×15 mm3 at 1.5, 3 and 7 T respectively. Imaging parameters were TR of 3 s, SENSE factor 2.5, flip angle 90°, and TE1/TE2 of 25/80 ms, 22/60 ms and 16/47 ms at 1.5, 3 and 7 T respectively. These double echo GE-EPI echo times were selected to optimally fit T2* based on the expected grey matter T2* value at each B0, as reported in Peters et al. (2007). In addition, at normoxia, a series of inversion recovery GE-EPI images were acquired at 10 inversion times (100, 200, 300, 500, 700, 1000, 1300, 1500, 2100 and 2600 ms) with matched geometry to the double echo GE-EPI data, which were fit for longitudinal relaxation time, T1. The first echo (TE1) images of the double echo GE-EPI datasets were motion corrected using MCFLIRT (FSL, fMRIB, Oxford, UK) and the resulting transforms were applied to the second echo (TE2) images. A grey matter (GM) mask was formed by thresholding T1 maps at 1.0≤T1≤1.3 s, 1.45≤T1≤1.75 s, and 1.8≤T1≤2.1 s for 1.5, 3 and 7 T respectively. To remove any remaining contributions in the GM mask from cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and large veins, those voxels with highest and lowest 3% of signal intensity respectively in the second echo (TE2) GE-EPI images were removed from the GM mask. R2* maps were then calculated within the GM mask on a voxel-wise basis using

R2*=1TE2TE1ln(S1S2) (2)

where S1 and S2 denote the signals measured at TE1 and TE2. The mean baseline R2* was then estimated for the GM mask from the normoxic period, and the baseline R2* subtracted from each R2* value on hyperoxia, to obtain a timeseries of ΔR2GM*.

The PETO2 trace was linearly interpolated to a TR of 3 s and PETO2 measurements were converted to venous oxygenation (Yv), assuming a baseline OEF of 0.4 (Chiarelli et al., 2007). Yv values were binned across the full theoretical range of 0.6 to 0.7, in steps of 0.025 to enable the corresponding R2GM* data to be group averaged over these bins. For each individual subjects’ data, at each B0, the average value of ΔR2GM* within the GM mask was fitted to two models. First, a simple linear function

R2GM*=A(1Yv)+C (3)

where (1−Yv) is proportional to [dHb] in Eq. (1), and A and C are the fitted gradient and intercept (which takes account of the fact that we do not measure ΔR2*GM with respect to Yv=0). Second, to a power law function

R2GM*=A(1Yv)β+C (4)

to estimate A′, β and C′, using a non-linear, three parameter least squares fit. Data were also fitted to Eq. (4), fixing β to published B0-corrected values (1.5, 1.3 and 1 for 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T respectively (Bulte et al., 2009; Davis et al., 1998; Driver et al., 2012)). The Chi-squared (Χ2) was used as a measure of the goodness of fit.

We also simulated the relationship between the EV signal and venous oxygenation by using the known blood deoxyhaemoglobin relaxivity to separate the IV component from the total tissue signal, to explore contributions of any residual IV signal which was not accounted for by removal of voxels containing large vessels. While the intravascular relaxation rate R2IV* varies quadratically with (1-Yv) (Blockley et al., 2008, Li et al., 1998) a linear relationship was assumed across the range of venous oxygenation targeted in this study (0.6–0.7) (Blockley et al., 2008). The resulting estimates of R2IV* were combined with the measured values of Δ R2GM* to estimate the variations in Δ R2EV*. First a simple two compartment model was assumed:

Svoxel=M0(fv.eTE.R2IV*+(1fv).eTE.R2EV*) (5)

where Svoxel is the GM signal measured from a voxel at echo time TE, ƒv is intravascular blood volume fraction (assumed to be 3% (Helenius et al., 2003; Lee et al., 2001)) and R2IV* and R2EV* correspond to the R2* of the IV and EV compartments respectively, neglecting vessel orientation effects. The ratio of the signal measured at echo times TE1 and TE2 can then be written as:

S1S2=fv.eTE1.R2IV*+(1fv).eTE1.R2EV*fv.eTE2.R2IV*+(1fv).eTE2.R2EV*, (6)

Assuming that ΔR2EV* also varied linearly with Y over the range of interest and a literature value of f, the variation in S1/S2 versus (1−Yv) was fitted to determine the expected values of ΔR2EV*. In this simulation the differences in T1 and spin density between tissue and blood were assumed negligible; in fact tissue possesses a slightly lower spin density and shorter T1 than blood so these effects will work in opposing directions.

3. Results

Average baseline and peak PETO2 values achieved at each B0 are shown in Table 1, along with the corresponding Yv value. Group averaged PETO2 traces are shown in Fig. 1A–C. PETCO2 values were maintained within ±0.39 mmHg of an individuals’ resting level, with the mean change between baseline normoxia and peak hyperoxia being 0.70±0.12 mmHg, across all subjects and B0. Such fluctuations in PETCO2 were assumed to have minimal influence on R2*. Baseline (normoxic) R2GM* increased significantly with B0 (p < 0.005, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Example Yv and ΔR2GM* timecourses are shown for representative subjects across B0 in Fig. 1D–F. Corresponding maps of R2* and the gradient (A) of the linear fit to Eq. (3) are depicted in Fig. 2.

Table 1.

Average baseline and peak PETO2 values and corresponding venous oxygenation (Yv) estimated according to the interpolation method outlined in Chiarelli et al. (2007). Baseline R2GM*(S1) and the gradients (A) of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) for both β=1 (linear model) and typical B0-adjusted values of β. Χ2 depicts goodness-of-fit. Data (mean±SEM) averaged across subjects for each magnet field strength (B0).

B0(T) PETO2(mmHg)
Venous oxygenation (Yv)
MR parameters for GM mask
Baseline Peak Baseline Peak Baseline R*2GM (s−1) Gradient (A) of ΔR*2GM v. (1−Yv) linear fit (Eq. (3)) (s−1) Χ2 for nonlinear fit using B0-corrected β values (Eq. (4)) Χ2 for nonlinear 3 parameter fit (Eq. (4))
1.5 115±3 482±11 0.600±0.001 0.670±0.002 12.7±0.2 4.1±0.4 (χ2=6.4±2.0) χ2=6.4±2.0 χ2=6. 4±2.0
3 109±3 485±9 0.600±0.001 0.680±0.001 19.5±0.5 3.9±0.3 (χ2=4.3±1.1) χ2=4.3±1.1 χ2=4.2±1.8
7 119±2 490±13 0.600±0.001 0.670±0.003 33.2±0.7 13.2±2.0 (χ2=4.7±1.8) χ2=4.7±1.8 χ2=4.6±1.8

p<0.01.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A–C) Group averages of end tidal partial pressure of oxygen (PETO2) shown in black at each field strength across the twelve minute respiratory paradigm. Grey regions indicate standard deviation. (D–F) Interpolated venous oxygenation (Yv) time course for representative subjects and accompanying ΔR*2 (s−1) at B) 1.5 T, C) 3 T and D) 7 T.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Grey matter (GM) masks, EPIs for TE1 and TE2 at normoxic baseline, with corresponding R*2 images, and voxelwise gradient of ΔR*2GM versus (1−Yv). Data shown for representative subjects at A) 1.5 T, B) 3 T and C) 7 T.

Fig. 3A shows the effect of the fractional change in venous oxygenation (1−Yv) on ΔR2GM* for each B0. The average gradient, A, of the linear fit of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) (Eq. (3)) is given in Table 1. This was significantly larger for 7 T than 1.5 or 3 T (p=0.043, Kruskall-Wallis one-way ANOVA), although no significant difference was observed between 1.5 and 3 T.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

(A) Effect of change in fractional venous oxygenation (1−Yv) on A) ΔR*2GM (s−1) and B) ΔR*2EV (s−1), shown at 1.5 T (black), 3 T (grey) and 7 T (red). Data binned and averaged across subjects. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

The data was sufficiently described by the linear 2 parameter (A and C) model fit (Eq. (3)) (p<0.01 in all cases). The 3 parameter model, showed no significant improvements in goodness-of-fit (Χ2 Difference test) when compared to either of the 2 parameter fits (linear, and fixed B0-corrected values of β).

When R2EV* was estimated across binned Yv values based on the measured signals and estimated R2IV*, the results demonstrated a monotonic increase in the gradient of Δ R2EV* and (1−Yv) with B0 (Fig. 3B). Fig. 4 illustrates subsequent intravascular and extravascular GM signal components for the echo times and field strengths used in this study, for both normoxia and hyperoxia, using Eq. (5).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Variation in relative IV signal contribution with (1−Yv) estimated for each echo time and field strength.

4. Discussion

The relationship between ΔR2GM* and fractional venous oxygenation (1−Yv) was measured at 1.5, 3 and 7 T, and found to be well-described by a linear relationship at all B0s. This contrasts with previous studies which inferred that β≥1 by manipulating B0 (Driver et al., 2010, Rossi et al., 2012, van der Zwaag et al., 2009), and by the direct measurement of a value of β of 1.35 at 3 T using the response to combined hyperoxia and hypercapnia (Wise et al., 2013). In our study β was measured using an isocapnic hyperoxic stimulus and so the results are not confounded by changes in vCBV which will have occurred in previous studies, with vCBV altered by motor activation (van der Zwaag et al., 2009), the vasodilative effect of hypercapnia (Driver et al., 2010, Wise et al., 2013) or non-isocapnic hyperoxia (Rossi et al., 2012).

Baseline R2GM* increased monotonically and approximately linearly with B0, in agreement with published cross-field values (Rossi et al., 2012, van der Zwaag et al., 2009). In contrast, the gradient of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) measured in this study did not increase monotonically (Fig. 3). Extravascular dephasing depends on the intravascular frequency shift (Δω), which depends linearly on both (1−Yv) and B0:

Δω=k.γ.B0.Δχ.(1Yv) (7)

where k is a constant reflecting vessel geometry, γ is the gyromagnetic ratio and Δχ is the difference in magnetic susceptibility between fully deoxygenated blood and tissue. Therefore, if we were only sensitive to extravascular signal in the static or indeed diffusive regimes, the gradient of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) would be expected to increase monotonically with B0 (Boxerman et al., 1995, Ogawa et al., 1993; Yablonskiy and Haacke, 1994). In practice, the gradient was effectively constant between 1.5 and 3 T and increased faster than linearly with B0 between 3 and 7 T (Table 1).

In practice, the non-negligible intravascular (IV) signal will contribute to the signal from GM (Hare et al., 2016), even when signal from large vessels has been masked out, as was the case in this work. Therefore, the unexpected variation in the gradient of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) with B0 might be explained by a variation in the ratio of IV signal to EV signal contributions with both B0 and echo time (TE). Here we combined measured values of ΔR2GM* with previously published values of R2IV* to estimate ΔR2EV*, and the results indicated that the gradient of ΔR2EV* versus (1−Yv) increased monotonically with B0 as expected (Boxerman et al., 1995, Ogawa et al., 1993; Yablonskiy and Haacke, 1994).

If a multi-compartment signal decay is fitted to a single exponential, the apparent R2* will depend on the choice of echo times at which the signal is sampled. Fig. 4 illustrates how the estimated relative contribution of intravascular signal to total signal varies with oxygenation and field strength for the T2* values measured here. The IV signal is smaller at normoxia than at hyperoxia, and therefore contributes less to the total signal as (1−Yv) increases. Furthermore, for the echo times used here, the IV signal is more sensitive to changes in fractional venous oxygenation than the EV signal, particularly at lower field. This varying intravascaular signal contribution may explain the unexpected variation of the gradient of ΔR2GM* versus (1−Yv) with B0. However, it should also be noted that any trends in the gradient of a linear fit over a limited range of (1−Yv) could be hard to interpret if the underlying function was not in fact linear. Future studies designed specifically to explore these relationships should use a multi-echo EPI readout and vascular crushing to separate the different IV and EV compartments. In this study the frequency offset (Δω) between tissue and blood was varied by changing both venous oxygenation and B0. To fully characterise the dependency of grey matterR2* on Δω, a larger intravascular susceptibility perturbation is required, either by modulating venous blood oxygenation over a wider range, which is difficult to achieve physiologically, or by using a paramagnetic contrast agent.

In summary if the underlying physical value of β for any compartment is non-linear, then the effective value of β will depend on experimental parameters and local tissue microvasculature (Griffeth et al., 2011; Martindale et al., 2008), but for calibrated BOLD an additional experiment to determine β would be impractical. However for the experimental protocol used here, which was deliberately characteristic of standard fMRI experiments, a linear approximation was sufficient to describe the observed behaviour across the limited range of (1−Yv)=0.3–0.4 relevant to the fMRI BOLD effect at all field strengths, which could simplify the calibration of the BOLD signal (Blockley et al., 2015, Griffeth et al., 2013, Merola et al., 2016). Recent work (Griffeth et al., 2011; Merola et al., 2016) has tested calibrated BOLD models by comparing the relatively simple BOLD signal models with a more detailed, multi-compartment BOLD signal model, treating this more detailed model as a gold standard from which to test the specificity of the calibrated BOLD approach to simulated data. The main conclusion of this work was that the physical meaning of the parameter β (alongside a physiological CBV/CBF coupling parameter) should be relaxed and their values treated as free parameters.

It has previously been shown that a strong hyperoxic stimulus (FiO2=1) will cause macroscopic alterations in inferior brain regions at 3 T which can increase the measured R2*, although such effects were reduced under moderate hyperoxia (FiO2=0.5) (Pilkinton et al., 2011). Similarly at 7 T, we have previously observed whole-head field shifts under moderate hyperoxia (~FiO2=0.6, PETO2=500 mmHg), although this only resulted in significant changes in R2* in regions close to the frontal sinus (Driver et al., 2011). In this work such macroscopic effects were mitigated by selecting slices superior to the ventricles, and using moderate hyperoxia. Nonetheless, further quantification of macroscopic inhomogeneities caused by hyperoxia and their impact on R2* are required to enable whole-head analysis. Furthermore, a different paradigm (e.g. sinusoidal (Blockley et al., 2010)) would make it easier to remove any drifts from the data.

5. Conclusions

This work presents the first experimental measurement of β in humans using an isocapnic hyperoxic stimulus to remove confounds associated with a change in CBV arising from functional activation or modulation of PETO2 during a respiratory challenge. It was also found that for the regimes relevant to calibrated BOLD experiments, a value of β=1 is a reasonable assumption, which may help simplify the calibrated BOLD model.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Emma Hall for her assistance with data acquisition and analysis. This work was funded by The University of Nottingham and The Medical Research Council (grant number G0901321).

References

  1. Blockley N., Driver I.D., Francis S.T., Fisher J. a, Gowland P.A. An improved method for acquiring cerebrovascular reactivity maps. Neuroimage. 2010;65(5):1278–1286. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blockley N., Driver I.D., Fisher J.A., Francis S.T., Gowland P.A. Measuring venous blood volume changes during activation using hyperoxia. Neuroimage. 2012;59(4):3266–3274. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Blockley N., Griffeth V., Stone A., Hare H., Bulte D. Sources of systematic error in calibrated BOLD based mapping of baseline oxygen extraction fraction. NeuroImage. 2015;122:105–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blockley N., Jiang L., Gardener A., Ludman C.N., Francis S.T., Gowland P. a. Field strength dependence of R1 and R2* relaxivities of human whole blood to ProHance, Vasovist, and deoxyhemoglobin. Magn. Reson. Med.: Off. J. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med./Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;60(6):1313–1320. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boxerman J.L., Hamberg L.M., Rosen B.R., Weisskoff R.M. Mr contrast due to intravascular magnetic susceptibility perturbations. Magn. Reson. Med. 1995;34(4):555–566. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bulte D.P., Drescher K., Jezzard P. Comparison of hypercapnia based calibration techniques for measurement of cerebral oxygen metabolism with MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2009;61(2):391–398. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chiarelli P.A., Bulte D.P., Wise R., Gallichan D., Jezzard P. A calibration method for quantitative BOLD fMRI based on hyperoxia. Neuroimage. 2007;37(3):808–820. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davis T.L., Kwong K.K., Weisskoff R.M., Rosen B.R. Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95(4):1834–1839. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Driver I., Blockley N., Fisher J., Francis S., Gowland P. The change in cerebrovascular reactivity between 3 T and 7 T measured using graded hypercapnia. NeuroImage. 2010;51(1):274–279. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Driver I., Harmer J., Hall E., Pritchard S., Francis S., Gowland P. Quantifying the artefacts caused by hyperoxic challenges. Proc. Int. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2011 [Google Scholar]
  11. Driver I., Hall E., Wharton S., Pritchard S., Francis S., Gowland P. Calibrated BOLD using direct measurement of changes in venous oxygenation. NeuroImage. 2012;63(3):1178–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fierstra J., Sobczyk O., Battisti-Charbonney A., Mandell D.M., Poublanc J., Crawley A.P., Mikulis D.J., Duffin J., Fisher J.A. Measuring cerebrovascular reactivity: what stimulus to use. J. Physiol. 2013;591(Pt 23):5809–5821. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.259150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffeth V.E.M., Buxton R.B. A theoretical framework for estimating cerebral oxygen metabolism changes using the calibrated-BOLD method: modeling the effects of blood volume distribution, hematocrit, oxygen extraction fraction, and tissue signal properties on the BOLD signal. NeuroImage. 2011;58(1):198–212. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffeth V.E.M., Blockley N.P., Simon A.B., Buxton R.B. A new functional MRI approach for investigating modulations of brain oxygen metabolism. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):1–13. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hare, H.V., Bulte, D.P., 2016. Investigating the Dependence of the Calibration Parameter M on Echo Time, 561, pp. 556–561. 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  16. He X., Yablonskiy D.A. Quantitative BOLD: Mapping of human cerebral deoxygenated blood volume and oxygen extraction fraction: Default state. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;57(1):115–126. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Helenius J., Perkiö J., Soinne L., Østergaard L., Carano R.A.D., Salonen O., Tatlisumak T. Cerebral hemodynamics in a healthy population measured by dynamic susceptibility contrast MR imaging. Acta Radiol. (Stockh., Swed.: 1987) 2003;44(5):538–546. doi: 10.1080/j.1600-0455.2003.00104.x. 〈http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14510762〉 Retrieved from. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kennan R.P., Zhong J., Gore J.C. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;31(1):9–21. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910310103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim S., Ogawa S. Biophysical and physiological origins of blood oxygenation level-dependent fMRI signals. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 2012;32(7):1188–1206. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee S.P., Duong T.Q., Yang G., Iadecola C., Kim S.G. Relative changes of cerebral arterial and venous blood volumes during increased cerebral blood flow: implications for BOLD fMRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001;45(5):791–800. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Levin J., deB Frederick B., Ross M., Fox J., von Rosenberg H., Kaufman M., Renshaw P. Influence of baseline hematocrit and hemodilution on BOLD fMRI activation. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2001;19(8):1055–1062. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(01)00460-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li D., Waight D.J., Wang Y. In vivo correlation between blood T2* and oxygen saturation. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging: JMRI. 1998;8(6):1236–1239. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1880080609. 〈http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9848734〉 Retrieved from. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lin W., RP P., Celik A., Hsu C., Powers W. Effects of acute normovolemic hemodilution on T2*-weighted images of rat brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 1998;40(6):857–864. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martindale J., Kennerley A.J., Johnston D., Zheng Y., Mayhew J.E. Theory and generalization of Monte Carlo models of the BOLD signal source. Magn. Reson. Med.: Off. J. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med./Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 2008;59(3):607–618. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Merola A., Murphy K., Stone A.J., Germuska M.A., Griffeth V.E.M., Blockley N.P., Wise R.G. NeuroImage Measurement of oxygen extraction fraction (OEF): An optimized BOLD signal model for use with hypercapnic and hyperoxic calibration. Neuroimage. 2016;129:159–174. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Ogawa S., Menon R.S., Tank D.W., Kim S.G., Merkle H., Ellermann J.M., Ugurbil K. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys. J. 1993;64(3):803–812. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81441-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Peters A.M., Brookes M.J., Hoogenraad F.G., Gowland P.A., Francis S.T., Morris P.G., Bowtell R. T2* measurements in human brain at 1.5, 3 and 7 T. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2007;25(6):748–753. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2007.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pilkinton D.T., Gaddam S.R., Reddy R. Characterization of paramagnetic effects of molecular oxygen on blood oxygenation level-dependent-modulated hyperoxic contrast studies of the human brain. Magn. Reson. Med. 2011;66(3):794–801. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rossi C., Boss A., Donati O.F., Luechinger R., Kollias S.S., Valavanis A., Nanz D. Manipulation of cortical gray matter oxygenation by hyperoxic respiratory challenge: field dependence of R(2)* and MR signal response. NMR Biomed. 2012;25(8):1007–1014. doi: 10.1002/nbm.2775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Slessarev M., Han J., Mardimae A., Prisman E., Preiss D., Volgyesi G., Fisher J.A. Prospective targeting and control of end-tidal CO2 and O2 concentrations. J. Physiol. 2007;581(3):1207–1219. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.129395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Uludag K., Müller-bierl B., Ugurbil K. An integrative model for neuronal activity-induced signal changes for gradient and spin echo functional imaging. Neuroimage. 2009;48(1):150–165. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van der Zwaag W., Francis S., Head K., Peters A., Gowland P., Morris P., Bowtell R. fMRI at 1.5, 3 and 7 T: characterising BOLD signal changes. Neuroimage. 2009;47(4):1425–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wise R.G., Harris A.D., Stone A., Murphy K. Measurement of OEF and absolute CMRO2: MRI-based methods using interleaved and combined hypercapnia and hyperoxia. Neuroimage. 2013;83:135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yablonskiy D.A., Haacke E.M. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn. Reson. Med. 1994;32(6):749–763. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES