Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1991 Dec 15;88(24):11413–11415. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11413

A test of Fisher's theory of dominance.

H A Orr 1
PMCID: PMC53145  PMID: 1763055

Abstract

One of the first patterns noticed by geneticists was that mutations are almost always recessive to their wild-type alleles. Several explanations of this striking pattern have been offered. The two most influential are Fisher's theory--which argues that dominance results from natural selection against recurring deleterious mutations--and Wright's theory--which argues that dominance results from the physiology of gene action. The debate over which of these theories is correct represents one of the most protracted controversies in the history of evolutionary biology. Here I test Fisher's theory by assessing the dominance of mutations in an organism that is typically haploid, the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. The results show that mutations are recessive just as often among haploid as among diploid species. This result falsifies Fisher's theory of dominance and provides strong support for the alternative physiological theory.

Full text

PDF
11413

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barsel S. E., Wexler D. E., Lefebvre P. A. Genetic analysis of long-flagella mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 1988 Apr;118(4):637–648. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.4.637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ebersold W. T. Chlamydomonas reinhardi: heterozygous diploid strains. Science. 1967 Jul 28;157(3787):447–449. doi: 10.1126/science.157.3787.447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernández E., Matagne R. F. In vivo complementation analysis of nitrate reductase-deficient mutants in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Curr Genet. 1986;10(5):397–403. doi: 10.1007/BF00418413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HALDANE J. B. The relation between density regulation and natural selection. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1956 Jul 24;145(920):306–308. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1956.0039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hartnett M. E., Newcomb J. R., Hodson R. C. Mutations in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Conferring Resistance to the Herbicide Sulfometuron Methyl. Plant Physiol. 1987 Dec;85(4):898–901. doi: 10.1104/pp.85.4.898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. James S. W., Ranum L. P., Silflow C. D., Lefebvre P. A. Mutants resistant to anti-microtubule herbicides map to a locus on the uni linkage group in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics. 1988 Jan;118(1):141–147. doi: 10.1093/genetics/118.1.141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kacser H., Burns J. A. The molecular basis of dominance. Genetics. 1981 Mar-Apr;97(3-4):639–666. doi: 10.1093/genetics/97.3-4.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. LEVINE R. P., EBERSOLD W. T. The genetics and cytology of Chlamydomonas. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1960;14:197–216. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.14.100160.001213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lee R. W., Gillham N. W., Van Winkle K. P., Boynton J. E. Preferential recovery of uniparental streptomycin resistant mutants from diploid Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Mol Gen Genet. 1973 Mar 1;121(2):109–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00277525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES