Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1962 Apr 1;66A(2):163–167. doi: 10.6028/jres.066A.013

Vibration-Rotation Bands of Carbonyl Sulfide

Arthur G Maki, Earle K Plyler, Eugene D Tidwell
PMCID: PMC5315331

Abstract

Thirty-two infrared absorption bands of carbonyl sulfide (OCS) have been measured and are reported here, seventeen for the first time. Seven absorption bands due to isotopic molecules were also measured. Rotational constants have been determined and the evaluation of the anharmonicity constants is discussed.

1. Introduction

Although considerable previous work has been done on the infrared spectrum of OCS [13],1 too few absorption bands had been measured to allow a determination of all the anharmonicity constants of this molecule. This work was undertaken to measure enough bands to enable such a determination to be made. When combined with previously published work, the additional bands reported here should be sufficient to determine the quadratic anharmonicity constants provided the Fermi resonance between v1 and 2v2 is the only vibrational perturbation of appreciable size. However, when the constants were calculated, it was found that some of the constants had varying values depending on the bands used in their determination. This discrepancy will be discussed in a later section.

2. Experimental Procedures

The spectra were measured on the NBS high-resolution spectrometer which has a 5 × 8 in. grating with 10,000 lines/in. The optical arrangement of the spectrometer was designed so that the grating could be used double pass for maximum resolution. With favorable conditions, such as low pressure, the spectrometer will partially resolve lines separated by 0.03 cm−1.

The high resolution was made possible by using a cooled PbS cell as detector. Further details concerning the instrument which was designed and built at the Bureau have been given in a previous publication [4].

The high resolution measurements at wavelengths greater than 4.5 μ were obtained using a 7,500 lines/in. grating and a cooled PbSe detector.

A multiple reflection gas cell with a path length of 8 m was used for the measurements. Various pressures were used although whenever possible pressures of a few mm were employed so that the maximum resolution could be attained. Some variation of the gas temperature was also utilized. Temperatures of 60 °C were sometimes used to aid in identification of lines due to “hot bands.”

The spectra were measured by using the fringe system of a Fabry-Perot interferometer as a comparison spectrum. The fringe system and absorption spectrum were recorded simultaneously by the use of a double pen recorder [5]. All wavelengths measured were reduced to wavenumbers in vacuum.

The carbonyl sulfide gas was obtained from the Matheson Company. It contained impurities of CS2, CO2, and HCN. It was purified by Roland Florin of the Bureau and the mass spectrometer analysis of the final product showed it to be about 99.8 percent pure. There were very small amounts of CS2 (0.2%) and HCN (0.03%) in the sample.

Thirty-two bands were measured in the spectral range from 1,890 to 6,100 cm−1. Some of these bands had been measured by previous workers at lower resolution, but those bands were remeasured in the attempt to obtain a more consistent set of energy levels. The 001–000 transition was measured by Callomon and Thompson [1]. They reported the band center at 2062.22 cm−1. In the present work the value obtained was 2062.22 cm−1 which is in excellent agreement. Likewise, the agreement is very good between the value of 4101.387 cm−1 obtained in this work for 2v3 and the value 4101.384 cm−1 obtained by Saksena, Wiggins, and Rank (see ref. 3).

Since the average spacing of the rotational lines in the bands of OCS is about 0.4 cm−1, the overlapping required very good resolution to reveal the true structure and especially the l-type doubling. In figures 1, 2, and 3 are shown the types of bands observed in three regions of the spectrum. In figure 1 is shown on a slow scan (two cm−1 per foot of record) the Q branch and part of the P branch through P10 of the 0111−000 transition. Overlapping these two branches is the R branch of the 300−000 transition. Figures 2 and 3 are records obtained at a much faster scanning rate (1 ft of record per 15 cm−1). In figure 3 a number of lines arising from water vapor of the atmosphere are superimposed on the spectrum of OCS. These water vapor lines have been identified and marked with a small circle on the figure.

Figure 1. The Q branch of v21+v3 at 2575.32 cm−1.

Figure 1

The pressure was 3 cm of Hg with a path of 8 m.

Figure 2. The main band and first “hot band” of the v1+v3 transition.

Figure 2

Path length was 8 m at 1 mm pressure.

Figure 3. Spectrum of OCS from 3070 cm−1 to 3120 cm−1 obtained at a pressure of 7 mm and a path length of 8 m.

Figure 3

The circles indicate absorption due to water vapor in the spectrometer.

3. Rotational Analysis

The rotational analyses were made using standard methods of the type described by Herzberg [6]. Since very accurate microwave measurements have been made on all the important isotopic species of OCS in the ground vibrational state and in a number of the lower lying vibrational states [7, 8, 9], no attempt was made to obtain accurate determinations of B″. Table 1 lists the infrared absorption bands of OCS which have been observed. This table also includes a tabulation of the observed values of ΔB. In general the values of ΔB are about what would be estimated for the various bands, but the detailed analysis of the rotational structure gave some ΔB values larger or smaller than expected. This difference may arise from the bands, especially the “hot bands,” overlapping thus making the observed position of a line different from the true position.

Table 1.

Infrared spectrum of carbonyl sulfide

All frequencies are in wavenumbers

Upper state Lower state Freq. (cm−1) B'–B" (D'–D") × 108 q' q"











0 11 0 0 0 0 a 520.41 ……… ……… ……… ………
1 0 0 0 0 0 a 858. 954 ……… ……… ……… ………
0 20 0 0 0 0 1047.1 ……… ……… ……… ………
2 0 0 0 0 0 b 1711.11 −0.00124 ……… ……… ………
1 31 0 0 11 0 1891.786 −0. 00015 ……… ……… ………
1 20 0 0 0 0 1892.203 +0. 000128   −0.41 ……… ………
0 l1 1 0 11 0 c 2054. 91 −0. 001202 ……… ……… ………
0 0 1 0 0 0 2062.220 −0. 001219  +0.08 ……… ………
0 40 0 0 0 0 2104. 830 +0. 001150   −0.84 ……… ………
0 51 0 0 11 0 c 2113. 93 +0. 00103 ……… ……… ………
4 0 0 1 0 0 2535.00 −0. 00189 ……… ……… ………
3 11 0 0 11 0 2536.691 −0.001737 ……… ……… ………
3 0 0 0 0 0 2556. 000 −0. 00186   −0.4 ……… ………
0 22 1 0 11 0 d 2568. 38 ……… ……… ……… ………
0 11 1 0 0 0 2575.318 {0.0009510.000765 }  −0.7 0. 00019 ………
2 31 0 0 11 0 2724. 842 {0.0005880.000342  1.3
2.0
}0. 00046 0. 00021
2 20 0 0 0 0 2731.399 −0. 000434   −0.5 ……… ………
1 11 1 0 11 0 2903.726 {0.0017600.001745   −0.8
−1.1
}0. 00025 0. 00023
2 0 1 1 0 0 2909.511 −0. 00129 ……… ……… ………
1 0 1 0 0 0 2918.116 −0.001765 +0.27 ……… ………
1 40 0 0 0 0 2936. 756 +0. 000585 −2.90 ……… ………
0 31 1 0 11 0 3094.935 {0.0006880.000485 +0.9
+1.1
}0. 00046 0. 00025
0 20 1 0 0 0 3095.568 −0. 0005348 −0.36 ……… ………
0 60 0 0 0 0 3170.636 +0. 00157 ……… ……… ………
0 0 2 1 0 0 3242.439 −0. 001814 1.6 ……… ………
4 0 0 0 0 0 3393. 95 −0. 00249 ……… ……… ………
2 0 1 0 0 0 3768.48 −0. 00178 ……… ……… ………
1 20 1 0 0 0 b 3937.434 −0. 001003 ……… ……… ………
0 11 2 0 11 0 4086.692 {0.0023900.002388 }1.30.3 ……… ………
0 0 2 0 0 0 4101.387 −0. 002426 e −0.115 ……… ………
0 40 1 0 0 0 e 4141.216 −0. 000032 2.087 ……… ………
3 0 1 0 0 0 e 4609.842 −0. 002998 0.034 ……… ………
2 20 1 0 0 0 e 4773.222 −0. 001493 0.260 ……… ………
1 11 2 0 11 0 4932.067 {0.0028450.002827 }-------- 0. 00032 0. 00028
1 0 2 0 0 0 4953.876 −0. 002843 1.8 ……… ………
2 0 2 0 0 0 b 5801.914 −0. 00332 ……… ……… ………
0 11 3 0 11 0 6095.47 −0.00360 ……… ……… ………
0 0 3 0 0 0 e 6117. 572 −0. 003618 −0.335 ……… ………
a

Obtained by Ritz principle (observed v1 = 859.0).

b

See reference 2.

c

See reference 1.

d

Only Q branch was observed.

e

See reference 3.

The microwave rotational data given in references 7, 8, and 9 have been used wherever applicable to this work.

Apparent differences between measured values of α are sufficiently great to warrant investigation of the possible effect of the rotation constants quadratic in v (the γij terms). Enough microwave data is available to allow calculation of some of the γij terms defined by

Bv1v2v3=Beiαi(vi+½di)+ijγij(vi+½di)(vj+½dj)

where j≥i = 1,2,3 and d1=d3= 1, d2=2. Other γij terms may be evaluated from infrared values of ΔB. The resuiting constants obtained in this way are tabulated in table 2.

Table 2.

Rotational constants for OCS

O16C12S32
α2 = −0.000348a cm−1
α3−2γ33γ23−½γ13=0.001213 cm−1
α1−2γ11γ12−½γ13=0.000683a cm−1
γll ≈ 0 (assumed value)
γ33>−0.3×10−5
γ22=−0.05a×10−5
γ12=+0.68a×10−5
γ23=+0.35×10−5
γ13 = 10×10−5 or 5×10−5

O16C13S32

α3b=0.001142 cm−1

O18C12S32

α3b=0.001177 cm−1

O16C12S34

α3b=0.001182 cm−1
a

Calculated from microwave frequencies using c = 2.997930×1010 cm/sec

b

These were determined by neglecting the γij terms.

All the γ’s which have been found except γ13 are of the order of magnitude which one would expect. Both values found for γ13 are almost certainly incorrect. The largest value of γ13 is obtained from data for the bands v1 + v3 and 2v20+v3. The precision of this data is very good and the deviation is considered to be somewhat greater than might be expected from experimental error. Since the band v1 + v3 is only 18.5 cm−1 from the band v1+4v20, resonance between these two bands might be responsible for the discrepancy in the rotational constants, even though the coupling parameter would be expected to be small. Another possibility is that the “l-type resonance” described by Amat and Nielsen [9a] may be creating an apparent error in the ΔB value.

The same situation is found for v1 + v3 and 2v20+v3 of OC13S. By using the microwave value of α2= − 0.000336 cm−1 and the infrared value of α3= 0.001142 cm−1 the unperturbed value of α1 calculated from the ΔB’s for v1 + v3 and 2v20+v3 is 0.000540 cm−1. This is smaller than the perturbed value of α1 (0.000596) obtained from microwave measurements. This result is, of course, not real and is further evidence that, in both O16C12S32 and O16C13S32, the Fermi diad v1 + v3 and 2v20+v3 may be perturbed.

The splitting due to l-type doubling was observed in four π—π transitions. The measurements were not extensive enough to determine the exact dependence of the doubling constant q on vibrational quantum number. It is quite evident, however, that q is approximately proportional to (v2 + l)/2 as expected.

4. Vibrational Analysis and Vibrational Constants

Table 1 contains a list of the absorption bands and constants which have now been measured for OCS. Included in this list are a number of transitions in which the lower state is a vibrationally excited state. By using the following combinations:

(400000)(400100)=3393.952535.00=858.95cm1(002000)(002100)=4101.3873242.439=858.948cm1(201000)(201100)=3768.482909.511=858.97cm1

a weighted average value of 858.954 cm−1 is found for v1. This is in very good agreement with a value of 859.03 which we have measured on a small commercial grating spectrometer. The value of v2 is determined to be 520.41 cm−1 by using (0111−000) − (0111−0110). This may be compared with the value of 521.5 found by Bartunek and Barker [10]. The 2v20 band has also been measured in this laboratory on a small commercial grating spectrometer and the band center was found to be 1047.1 cm−1. The rotational structure of this band was rather poorly resolved so that the band center could only be determined with certainty within one value of J.

Seven absorption bands have also been measured and assigned to isotopic species other than O16C12S32. These are given in table 3. More absorption bands have been found for OC13S than for OCS34, although the abundance ratio is 1:4. This is undoubtedly due to the greater shift in absorption frequencies for OC13S.

Table 3.

Observed infrared bands of isotopic OCS

All frequencies given in wavenumbers

O16C13S32

Upper state Lower state Freq. B'–B" D’–D''× 108









0 11 1 0 11 0 2002.425 −0. 00111 ………
0 0 1 0 0 0 2009. 249 −0. 00115 −0.6
1 0 1 0 0 0 2861. 08 −0. 001635 −2  
0 20 1 0 0 0 3012. 89 −0.000517 ………
0 0 2 0 0 0 3996. 50 −0.00228 ………

O16C12S34

0 0 2 0 0 0 4099. 873 −0.002364 −0.5

O18C12S32

0 0 2 0 0 0 4030. 390 −0.002354 ………

With the large amount of vibrational data now available, it is possible to calculate some of the quadratic vibrational constants by two or more independent methods. Upon neglecting the cubic terms (yijk) three different values are found for the combination x11+4x22+x12. These are −5.37, −5.01, and − 3.63 cm−1. The disagreement indicates that either the cubic terms must be taken into account, or else an unexpected perturbation is present. For the series v3, 2v3, 3v3 it has previously been shown [2] that only a very small cubic term is required to give nearly perfect agreement between calculated and observed frequencies. This is also the case for the “hot bands” of these transitions. From these bands the pertinent cubic constants arc found to be y233 = −0.03 cm−1 and y333 = +0.01 cm−1. Both of these are of the expected order of magnitude. These are the only cubic terms which can be determined explicitly from the available data without determining the unperturbed frequencies of the resonating vibrations.

One can also evaluate various combinations of quadratic and cubic constants by suitable combinations of the sums of various Fermi resonant multiplets but the resulting values are of dubious accuracy. One such combination yields y113+4y233+y123 = 1.38 cm−1 which seems rather large for such a heavy molecule.

Because of inconsistencies in the values of the ΔB's for the Fermi resonant bands, it seems premature at this time to find the unperturbed frequencies of these vibrations. Further very careful work must be done on OCS in order to ascertain whether any further perturbations are present.

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

5. References

  • 1.Callomon HJ, Thompson HW. Proc Roy Soc. 1954;A222:431. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allen HC, Plyler EK, Blaine LH. J Chem Phys. 1957;26:400. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saksena GD, Wiggins TA, Rank DH. J Chem Phys. 1959;31:839. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Plyler EK, Blaine LR. J Research NBS. 1959;62:7. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Plyler EK, Blaine LR, Tidwell ED. J Research NBS. 1955;55:183. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Herzberg G. Infrared and Raman spectra of polyatomic molecules. D Van Nostrand Co., Inc.; New York: 1954. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Townes CH, Schawlow AH. Microwave Spectroscopy. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc.; New York: 1955. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.King WC, Gordy W. Phys Rev. 1954;93:407. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peter M, Strandberg MWP. Phys Rev. 1954;95:622. [Google Scholar]
  • 9a.Amat G, Nielsen HH. J Mol Spectroscopy. 1958;2:163. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bartunek P, Barker EF. Phys Rev. 1935;48:516. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES