Table 2.
Baseline Mean ± SD | Last Follow-up Mean ± SD | Within- subject Δ Mean ± SD | 95% CI for Δ [LB, UB] | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All subjects: | |||||
miniAQLQ total score (n=61) | 4.6 ± 1.3 | 5.0 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 1.1 | [0.2, 0.7] | 0.002 |
Symptom score | 4.2 ± 1.4 | 4.9 ± 1.6 | 0.7 ± 1.2 | [0.3, 1.0] | <0.001 |
Activity score | 5.3 ± 1.4 | 5.6 ± 1.6 | 0.3 ± 1.4 | [0.02, 0.7] | 0.056 |
Emotional function score | 4.7 ± 1.6 | 5.2 ± 1.7 | 0.4 ± 1.2 | [0.1, 0.8] | 0.004 |
Environmental stimuli score | 4.1 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 0.3 ± 1.6 | [−0.1, 0.7] | 0.186 |
ACT total score (n=52) | 18.5 ± 4.9 | 19.8 ± 5.0 | 1.3 ± 4.1 | [0.2, 2.4] | 0.025 |
Subjects with preoperative uncontrolled asthma: (n=28) | |||||
miniAQLQ total score | 3.9 ± 1.0 | 4.7 ± 1.6 | 0.7 ± 1.3 | [0.3, 1.2] | 0.004 |
Symptom score | 3.6 ± 1.1 | 4.5 ± 1.7 | 0.9 ± 1.3 | [0.4, 1.4] | 0.001 |
Activity score | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 5.4 ± 1.7 | 0.7 ± 1.6 | [0.1, 1.3] | 0.023 |
Emotional function score | 4.1 ± 1.5 | 4.7 ± 1.9 | 0.6 ± 1.3 | [0.1, 1.1] | 0.026 |
Environmental stimuli score | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 4.1 ± 1.6 | 0.7 ± 1.7 | [0.04, 1.3] | 0.036 |
ACT total score | 15.0 ± 3.9 | 17.9 ± 5.8 | 2.9 ± 4.4 | [1.2, 4.6] | 0.002 |
All subjects CRS-specific quality of life scores: (n=61) | |||||
SNOT-22 total score | 60.1 ± 19.6 | 26.3 ± 19.8 | −33.8 ± 22.8 | [−39.5, −28.1] | <0.001 |
Rhinologic symptoms | 18.5 ± 6.4 | 8.3 ± 6.0 | −10.2 ± 7.5 | [−12.0, −8.3] | <0.001 |
Extra-nasal rhinologic symptoms | 9.7 ± 2.9 | 4.9 ± 3.5 | −4.8 ± 3.8 | [−5.8, −3.9] | <0.001 |
Ear / facial symptoms | 10.0 ± 5.6 | 4.2 ± 4.5 | −5.8 ± 5.4 | [−7.1, −4.4] | <0.001 |
Psychological dysfunction | 18.2 ± 7.5 | 7.3 ± 7.6 | −10.9 ± 8.9 | [−13.1, −8.7] | <0.001 |
Sleep dysfunction | 15.8 ± 6.0 | 7.3 ± 6.7 | −8.5 ± 7.0 | [−10.3, −6.8] | <0.001 |
SD, standard deviation; Δ, delta (change); LB, lower bound; UB, upper bound; CI, confidence interval; SNOT-22, 22-item SinoNasal Outcome Test; miniAQLQ, the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; ACT, the Asthma Control Test; Within-subject improvement in all outcome measures was evaluated using either matched pairs t-testing or Wilcoxon signed-rank testing, depending on distribution normality.