Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Matrix Biol. 2016 Aug 20;60-61:110–123. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.08.003

Fibrin mechanical properties and their structural origins

Rustem I Litvinov 1, John W Weisel 1,*
PMCID: PMC5318294  NIHMSID: NIHMS813159  PMID: 27553509

Abstract

Fibrin is a protein polymer that is essential for hemostasis and thrombosis, wound healing, and several other biological functions and pathological conditions that involve extracellular matrix. In addition to molecular and cellular interactions, fibrin mechanics has been recently shown to underlie clot behavior in the highly dynamic intra- and extravascular environment. Fibrin has both elastic and viscous properties. Perhaps the most remarkable rheological feature of the fibrin network is an extremely high elasticity and stability despite very low protein content. Another important mechanical property that is common to many filamentous protein polymers but not other polymers is stiffening occurring in response to shear, tension, or compression. New data has begun to provide a structural basis for the unique mechanical behavior of fibrin that originates from its complex multi-scale hierarchical structure. The mechanical behavior of the whole fibrin gel is governed largely by the properties of single fibers and their ensembles, including changes in fiber orientation, stretching, bending, and buckling. The properties of individual fibrin fibers are determined by the number and packing arrangements of double-stranded half-staggered protofibrils, which still remain poorly understood. It has also been proposed that forced unfolding of sub-molecular structures, including elongation of flexible and relatively unstructured portions of fibrin molecules, can contribute to fibrin deformations. In spite of a great increase in our knowledge of the structural mechanics of fibrin, much about the mechanisms of fibrin's biological functions remains unknown. Fibrin deformability is not only an essential part of the biomechanics of hemostasis and thrombosis, but also a rapidly developing field of bioengineering that uses fibrin as a versatile biomaterial with exceptional and tunable biochemical and mechanical properties.

Keywords: fibrin structure, fibrin mechanics, biopolymer mechanics, rheology


Fibrin is a major component of intra- or extravascular blood clots that form at the sites of vessel wall damage and also of the extracellular matrix. Fibrin provides clots and thrombi with elasticity that is important for their hemostatic function, obstructiveness and stability; it also determines the functionality of various cellular processes, including adhesion, migration, proliferation and differentiation, wound healing, angiogenesis, inflammation, etc.

Since pioneering systematic studies of the structural biomechanics of fibrin performed by John Ferry [1-4], this problem has evolved into a rapidly developing area of interdisciplinary research. First of all, fibrin mechanics is an important part of the field of hemostasis and thrombosis because blood clots and thrombi that contain the fibrin scaffold undergo dramatic deformations under (patho)physiological conditions such as hydrodynamic blood shear [5-7], contraction of platelets [8, 9], and aortic aneurisms [10-13]. Therefore, the outcomes of many bleeding and thrombotic disorders, including thromboembolisms, are largely determined by mechanical behavior of the fibrin network [14]. At the same time, fibrin mechanics has become increasingly important in view of extensive new applications of fibrin as a biomaterial, e.g., in tissue engineering, cell culturing, drug delivery, wound sealing, etc., where the mechanical support provided by a fibrin network, in combination with other properties, makes it a unique, versatile, and quite useful hydrogel [15].

Viscoelastic properties of fibrin (fibrin rheology)

Fibrin is a viscoelastic polymer, which means that it has both elastic and viscous properties. The elasticity (or stiffness) is characterized by reversible mechanical deformation, while viscosity (or plasticity) is characterized by irreversible deformation induced by force. Viscoelastic biomaterials differ in the relative degrees of both elastic and viscous properties, which are quantified by measuring the responses to deformation, referred to as rheometry. For fibrin clots, the elastic component is generally about an order of magnitude higher than the viscous component, although the viscous component increases rapidly at higher rates of deformation. Remarkably, during creep experiments, in which continued changes in strain are measured over time after application of stress, some clots do not change in stiffness [16], which means that fibrin is a “self-repairing” structure, most likely because the knob-hole bonds holding the structure together are reversible [17].

Devices used to measure viscoelasticity (rheometers), vary by geometry and protocol of the induced deformation. The most commonly used are shear rheometers that impose a controlled shear strain (or a controlled shear force) on the fibrin clot sample placed between two surfaces, one of them being moved in an oscillatory manner to deform fibrin in the plane of shear. A sinusoidal oscillation has the form of γ = γ0*sin(ωt), where ω is the frequency and γ0 is the strain amplitude, and the shear stress σ required to impose such a deformation is measured. For a linear viscoelastic material, shear stress is a sinusoidal function with some phase shift δ, i.e. σ = σ0*sin(ωt+δ), where σ0 is the shear stress amplitude. The elastic response of the fibrin clot is characterized by the shear storage modulus, G′, corresponding to the part of shear stress that is in phase with strain and is calculated as G′ = (σ00)*cos(δ). The viscous response of the clot to applied shear is measured by the shear loss modulus, G″, calculated as the out-of-phase part of the stress as G″= (σ00)*sin(δ). The terms “storage” and “loss” refer to the energy stored or lost during the deformation, respectively. The storage and loss moduli determine how the clot responds to the forces to which it is subjected. For example, a stiffer clot (higher G′) will not deform as much as a less stiff one with the same applied stress.

In a tensile rheometer, the elastic properties are measured by applying a longitudinal or stretching stress (i.e., force per unit area) to a cylindrical or bar-like sample and determining the resulting strain (S), which is the stretching or distortion of the polymer normalized with respect to total length (S = L/L0 - 1, where L is the stretched length and L0 is the initial length). The resulting stress-strain curve is used to determine its slope or the ratio of the stress required to produce a certain strain (tensile elastic modulus). If a large stress is necessary to produce displacement, then that object is stiff, while a small modulus means that less stress is required, so this other object is less stiff. Similarly, compressive properties can be measured by applying a pressure on the sample with the degree of compression defined as a negative strain and the (compressive) elastic modulus determined by the slope of a stress-strain curve obtained in response to strain- or force-controlled compression. The rheometry-based quantification of fibrin viscoelasticity is described in detail elsewhere [18]. Table 1 compares the elasticity of some proteinaceous filaments.

Table 1.

Comparative stiffness and mechanical stability of various proteinaceous filaments*

Protein Young's modulus (MPa) Fracture strain (%)
Fibrin fiber, uncrosslinked 1.7±1.3** 226
Fibrin fiber, crosslinked 14.5±3.5** 332
Elastin 1 150
Myofibrils 1 200
Resilin 1-2 190, 313
Fibronectin# 0.1-3.5 700
Spider silk (Araneus Flag) 3 270
Fibrillin 0.2-100 >185
Intermediate filament 6-300 160-220
Mussel byssus 10-500 109
Collagen, tendon 160-7,500 12
Microtubules 1,000-1,500 ≤ 20
α-Keratin wet 2,000 45
Actin 1,800-2,500 ≤ 15
Collagen, crosslinked 5,000-7,000 12-16
Spider silk (Araneus Ma) 10,000 27
*

Based on [43]

**

[49]

#

[133]

Simplified systems that are not rheometers yet record changes in clot stiffness over time, named thromboelastography (or thromboelastometry), have been widely used in clinical medicine to monitor the formation of whole blood or plasma clots based on their elasticity [19-22]. In thromboelastography a small cylindrical anchor (pin) is immersed into the activated blood or plasma sample placed inside a round cuvette, which is slowly rotated at a small angle around its initial position. In the absence of a clot, the rotation of the cuvette is not transmitted to the anchor, while after the beginning of clot formation the anchor becomes tethered to the walls of the cuvette and starts to rotate synchronously with the cuvette. The circular amplitude of the anchor increases as the clot is getting stiffer. A curve that circumscribes the amplitudes of the anchor over time shows the time course of clotting based on the increasing stiffness of the clot (Fig. 1). The width of this curve after stabilization characterizes the stiffness of the clot in arbitrary units. This method can be also used to follow dissolution of the clot due to fibrinolytic activity that results in decrease of clot stiffness during enzymatic cleavage of fibrin until complete clot dissolution. Thromboelastometry is similar but different from thromboelastography in that the pin immersed into the blood sample oscillates, not the cuvette, and when fibrin strands are formed between the pin and the wall of the cuvette an increasing force is exerted on the pin, which is recorded. The output of thromboelastography and thromboelastometry is basically the same and visualized as a curve that provides information on the clotting lag time, rate of clot growth or dissolution, and clot stiffness.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Thromboelastography and thromboelastometry are commonly used in clinical medicine to characterize clotting. A typical thromboelastogram comprises a symmetrical curve that circumscribes the rotational amplitude of the anchor immersed in the clotting blood or plasma. The anchor starts oscillating when fibrin forms and connects the anchor to the walls of the oscillating cuvette. The main parameters of the curve are: R (minutes) – reaction time or time from initiation of clotting to the first signs of clot formation; K (minutes) – time until clot reaches about 20 mm; MA – maximal amplitude or the maximum strength of the clot; alpha angle (degrees) – the angle that reflects with K the rate of fibrin formation or clotting; MA (mm) – maximal amplitude or stiffness of the clot. Fibrinolysis can be measured as the eventual decrease of stiffness of the clot as it is digested.

Based on the same physical principles, novel tests for viscoelasticity of a clot have also been developed [23]. One of them is based on free oscillation rheometry, in which the cup containing the blood sample is set into free oscillation by a torsion wire device and the damping and frequency of the change in the oscillating movement is recorded and translated by the system into viscous and elastic parameters, respectively [24]. Atomic force microscopy-based micro- and nanorheology allows for precise measurements of the clot viscoelastic properties using a very small sample volume in the 3-50 nN force range [25, 26]. Another method named resonant acoustic spectroscopy with optical vibrometry measures the clot elastic modulus from the intrinsic resonant frequency of a clot [27]. Fibrin stiffness can be also measured using magnetic tweezers based on mechanical manipulation of magnetic beads embedded into the network [28-30].

Although the extensive biological and clinical relevance of fibrin viscoelastic properties is beyond the scope of this review, here are some examples. Based on viscoelastic properties of incipient blood clots, a new biomarker of healthy, bleeding or prothrombotic clot microstructure was proposed, named the fractal dimension, which has been shown to have clinically important correlations [31-33]. Clots derived from the blood of subjects with pulmonary embolism showed accelerated establishment of viscoelastic properties compared to healthy donors [34]. Studies have shown that the stiffness of clots formed from the blood of patients who have had heart attacks at an early age is 50% greater than that of controls, indicating that these clots are abnormal [35]. It was recently shown that platelets sense the stiffness of the underlying fibrin/fibrinogen substrate so that higher substrate stiffness leads to increased platelet activation, adhesion and spreading [36]. Lastly, the stiffness of the fibrin scaffold of occlusive thrombi is a major determinant for effectiveness of their mechanical damage and removal to restore the impaired blood flow [37].

Non-linear elasticity and high deformability of fibrin

Irrespective of the type of rheometer used, elasticity of fibrin clots can be characterized by a stress-strain curve, in which an applied stress is plotted against the degree of induced deformation (strain). At low strains or deformations, stress is directly proportional to strain and the slope of the curve (the elastic modulus) is constant. At larger strains, the linearity is broken and the slope of the curve increases dramatically, so that the elastic modulus or stiffness of the clot increases up to an order of magnitude [38]. This non-linearity is called strain hardening or strain stiffening and is a fundamental property of biological gel-like structures [39].

Fibrin is a highly extensible polymer, which means that under stress blood clots will tend to stretch rather than break. Plasma clots stabilized with factor XIIIa could be stretched to over three times their relaxed length before breaking with an average stretch of 2.7-fold [40]. Using hydraulic tension, plasma clots were elongated more than 2-fold until the moment of rupture that happened at an average rupture stress of 550 mN/mm2 [41]. The fracture strain of a clot has been shown to depend strongly on the volume fraction of red blood cells, which may be important for embolization [42].

The extraordinary extensibility, viscoelasticity, including strain stiffening, has been demonstrated and quantified not only for the whole fibrin clots but also at the level of individual fibers. This can be observed when a fibrin fiber is laterally stretched with a tip of an atomic force microscope, so that crosslinked and uncrosslinked fibrin fibers are stretched to about 2.5 and 3.3 times their original length before rupturing [43-45]. The elasticity of individual fibers depends strongly on their diameter such that thin fibers can be 100 times stiffer than thick fibers [46]. Propagation of strain-stiffening throughout the entire fibrin gel is largely determined by the fine structure and non-linear elastic properties of individual fibrin fibers [47, 48]. As fibers are stretched, they become stiffer than any surrounding fibers at lower strains; this allows the more strained, stiffer fibers, to distribute the strain load to the less strained fibers and reduce strain concentrations [47]. The stiffening of single fibers was observed at strains >110% with an increase of the elastic modulus by a factor of 1.9 for crosslinked and 3.0 for uncrosslinked fibers, respectively [44]. Individual fibrin fibers are much stiffer for stretching than for flexion as would be expected from their diameter and length [49].

In addition to shear and tension, the non-linear elasticity of fibrin has been observed also in response to compressive deformations [50]. When a fibrin network is exposed to an external compressive load, the viscoelastic properties of the network exhibit a complex non-uniform behavior reflected by gradual softening followed by dramatic stiffening (Fig. 2). The compressive normal force increases non-linearly, also revealing a stress-softening-stiffening transition [50]. The compressive stiffening, i.e., an increase in the elastic modulus and normal force at higher degrees of compression, correlates with an increase in fibrin network density and crisscrossing of fibrin fibers observed by confocal microscopy of hydrated fibrin clots. These rheological measurements, in combination with structural studies, reveal a complex interplay between entropic and enthalpic fibrin fiber elasticity playing an important role in determining fibrin network mechanical response to compression.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Non-linear elasticity of fibrin. In response to compression, the shear elastic modulus (G′) of a fibrin network first decreases, followed by a dramatic increase of the stiffness at compressive strains γ>0.8. At the maximal compressions (γ>0.9), fibrin networks display more than a 100-fold increase in the shear elastic modulus compared to their uncompressed states. The degree of compression (compressive strain, γ) is defined as the absolute fractional decrease in fibrin clot thickness, γ=ΔLL0, where ΔL = LL0, and L0 and L are the initial and reduced thickness dimensions of the uncompressed and compressed clots, respectively. (Adapted from Kim, et al. [50])

There are a number of environmental factors that modulate fibrin stiffness both in vitro and in vivo. One of the main physiological modulators of fibrin mechanics is factor XIIIa, which increases the elastic modulus of fibrin several-fold by catalyzing fibrin covalent crosslinking and compacting fibers [51]. Clot rigidity correlates strongly with the structure of fibrin networks, namely with fiber size and branching that varied upon conditions of clotting [52]. Based on the in vitro effects of zinc that reduces fibrin clot stiffness, it was suggested that zinc released from activated platelets may modulate clot strength and stability in cooperation with factor XIIIa [53]. Fibrin polymerized under continuous mechanical perturbation was shown to form a rigid clot with dramatically altered viscoelastic properties [54]. Cells embedded into extracellular matrix can induce stiffening of fibrin gels via myosin-driven cell contraction, which may be important for a number of patho(physiological) conditions, such as wound healing and cancer genesis [55]. Fibrin elasticity can be modulated by other physical [56-58] or biochemical [59, 60] modifications as well as by blood components incorporated into the fibrin network [60-62].

The tunable non-linear elasticity of fibrin may be important biologically because it allows fibrin clots to be compliant at smaller strains and then become stiffer at larger deformations that could otherwise threaten clot integrity and make them prone to embolization. In addition, the complex mechanical behavior of filamentous biopolymers, such as fibrin, is important for the interaction between cells and extracellular matrix [63]. Since mechanical stress makes fibrin more resistant to fibrinolysis [64, 65], fibrin elasticity may be a significant determinant of susceptibility of clots and thrombi to endogenous or exogenous thrombolytics. For example, fibrin formed in the presence of the vessel wall components displayed a reduced stiffness associated with increased susceptibility to enzymatic lysis [66]. On the contrary, the addition of histone-DNA complexes to fibrin (mimicking their interaction in the neutrophil extracellular traps at the site of inflammation/thrombosis) results in an increased fibrin rigidity and slower fibrinolysis [67].

Multiscale structural basis for fibrin mechanics

Plasma fibrin clots have a remarkably porous structure with the mass fraction of protein of only about 0.3% (Fig. 3). Some of the relationships between clot structure and mechanical properties have been investigated with respect to concentrations of fibrinogen and calcium ions as well as the activity of thrombin and factor XIIIa [18]. The fibrin network densities resulting from low and high fibrinogen concentration were shown to be a major determinant of clot elasticity [52, 68]. Additional clues to the origins of fibrin elasticity have come from examination of the structural changes accompanying controlled deformations of fibrin clots. Structural changes underlying the elastic properties of fibrin occur at different, yet interconnected, spatial levels, namely the molecular level, individual fibers, fiber network, and the whole clot.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A three-dimensional reconstruction of a hydrated fibrin network. The clot was formed in human citrated platelet-poor plasma at room temperature for 30 minutes after addition of calcium chloride (20 mM) and thrombin (0.5 U/ml). To visualize fibrin network structure using fluorescent confocal microscopy, Alexa-Fluor 488-labeled human fibrinogen was added to the plasma sample before clotting at a final concentration of 0.04 mg/ml. The network was imaged using a Zeiss LSM710 laser scanning confocal microscope to generate z-stack images spanning 100 μm of sample thickness, with a distance of 0.5 μm between slices and 1024×1024 pixel resolution for each slice.

At the macroscopic scale (10−2 m), in addition to their large extensibility, fibrin clots also display a dramatic decrease in volume when they are stretched [40]. The shrinkage of the stretched clot is due to water expulsion and network densification, as confirmed by an approximately 10-fold increase in the protein content in clots stretched 3-fold. This observation might be related to the phenomenon of negative normal stress observed for networks of semiflexible polymers, because even though fibrin fibers are relatively stiff, it is still possible that they buckle more easily than they stretch, thus leading to an effective inward force [69]. An alternative or additional explanation, which has been confirmed experimentally, is that the volume change is associated with a molecular structural transition that occurs in stretched fibrin fibers [40, 70].

At the network scale (10−5 m) non-deformed clots, imaged using scanning electron microscopy, have well separated fibers with an essentially random orientation, building an isotropic filamentous web (Fig. 4A). When tensile strain is applied, the fibers begin to align along the direction of strain (Fig. 4B) [40, 70, 71]. In addition to the alignment of fibers, transmission electron microscopy of transverse sections through fibrin clots at increasing strain showed that the fibers become thinner, closer together, and bundle [40, 72]. Using scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 4C) and confocal microscopy [50], a dramatic rearrangement of the fibrin network is also observed in response to compressive deformation. As compression proceeds, the fibrin network density increases, fibers reorient in the compression plane and shorter fiber segments are formed as a result of fiber crisscrossing. At higher degrees of compression, the number of crisscrossed fibers dramatically increases. In addition, fibers undergo re-orientation, transforming the whole network architecture to a planar-like structure aligned in a plane perpendicular to the compression direction. This newly formed network composed of shorter fiber segments and aligned in a plane of shear has higher shear elasticity, because average strain of individual plane-oriented fiber segments is larger compared to the strain imposed on randomly oriented fibers in an uncompressed network.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Scanning electron microscopy images of unperturbed (A), 4-fold stretched (B), and strongly compressed (C) fibrin clots. Note fiber bundling both in the stretched and compressed fibrin clots. To form fibrin clots, 9 volumes of human citrated platelet-poor plasma were mixed with 1 volume of 0.025M CaCl2 and allowed to clot for 2 hours at 37°C. The conditions of clot stretching and compression as well as preparation of the clots for scanning electron microscopy are described in detail elsewhere [71].

At the fiber scale (10−6 m), in response to compression or shear individual fibrin fibers in the network begin to buckle and bend in the direction of deformation [50, 73]. As compression proceeds over small and intermediate compressive strains, more fibers of the network buckle and bend, thus reducing the amount of load-sustaining network elements. Because buckling and subsequent bending make fibers more compliant, the stiffness of the network in the transverse shear direction gradually decreases with compression.

The stress-strain curves of fibrin networks display remarkable changes in response to repeated large strain loading [74]. These changes look much like weakening because with every new step of deformation the same strain is reached at a smaller stress. However, when the repeated stress-strain cycles are corrected for a shift of the onset of strain-hardening, the superimposed curves have the same slopes, indicating the same stiffness of the networks, so the loadings do not weaken the networks. What actually changes after repeated increasing deformations is only the absolute strain at which the strain-hardening begins. This delay is attributed to the interplay between persistent lengthening and buckling of individual fibers as a result of each stretching event, so that every new deformation starts only after the buckled filaments are stretched again to higher strain. A clue to the mechanism of adaptation of individual fibrin fibers to loading conditions was found when fibrin was covalently crosslinked. The crosslinking completely abrogated the changes in stress-strain response to subsequent deformations. Because the covalent crosslinking precludes slippage of protofibrils within a fibrin fiber, this slippage has been proposed to be the main molecular mechanism for the plasticity observed in bulk and single-fiber experiments with repeated deformation of fibrin [75].

The molecular scale (10−8 m) of fibrin elasticity comprises a new and remarkable field of protein nanomechanics and is described in a separate subsequent section.

Molecular structural origins of fibrin mechanical properties

The cutting edge of fibrin mechanics is identifying parts of fibrin fibers, protofibrils, and monomers that undergo structural transitions in response to deformations of clots. It has been shown by us [40, 70] as well as others [48, 76] that fibrin mechanics is governed by a structural hierarchy, implying that fibrin deformation is accompanied by multiple structural rearrangements at different scales (Fig. 5). At the molecular level, it has been shown that the most important structural changes during fibrin deformations include unfolding of coiled-coils [77], the γ-nodules [78, 79], and the αC regions converted to αC polymers [80]. The role of the αC polymers, which seems to have been underestimated in the past, has been studied intensively more recently [81-86]. In addition, other studies point to a role of network branch points [87] and the γA/γ′ splice variants [29, 88]. Based on the known crystal structure of a folded fibrin(ogen) molecule, it could be predicted that full hypothetical unfolding of compact structures would results in a ~4.7-fold elongation (Fig. 6), which characterizes a large potential contribution of molecular unfolding in overall extensional deformations of fibrin [89, 90].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Diagram of the structure of the fibrin clot at different spatial scales, including macroscopic whole clot, network arrangement, single fiber composition, and molecular packing within a protofibril.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Schematic representation of the fibrin(ogen) molecule in the naturally folded and fully unfolded states. The mechanical unfolding force is applied to the C-terminal parts of the γ chains. Structural details show the unfolding transitions of the γ-nodules, the coiled coil regions, and the central nodule. Dimensions are shown for the compact crystal structure (PDB Entry: 3GHG), and the contour lengths of various structural elements are shown in the fully unfolded state, assuming a contour length per residue of 0.38 nm.

Based on the existence of two relatively long and co-axially aligned coiled-coils in rod-like fibrin(ogen), it has been hypothesized that an α-helix to β-strand conversion of the coiled-coils accompanies molecular extension of fibrin [43, 91]. The first direct experimental observation for an α-β transformation in fibrin was the low-resolution wide-angle X-ray scattering of squeezed fibrin films published back in 1943 [91], providing preliminary evidence for the transition from α-helix to β-sheet upon fibrin stretching. Much later, in 2011, by means of Congo red staining to detect the β-structures, which is commonly used to identify stacks of β-sheets in amyloid proteins, the formation of congophilic material, presumably new β-sheets, in stretched fibrin fibers was revealed [70], but the specificity of this method is not fully justified. Recently, the secondary structure changes during deformations of fibrin polymers studied using Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy showed that both extension and compression of a hydrated fibrin clots are accompanied by a transition of α-helix to β-sheet [71]. This structural transition has been confirmed and analyzed in detail using full-atom Molecular Dynamics simulations of extensional mechanical unfolding of a fibrin(ogen) molecule resolved crystallographically [92]. The unfolding transition from coiled-coil α-helices to β-sheets is a common feature of elastomeric proteinaceous fibers and networks [93].

Based on the paracrystalline molecular packing within a fibrin fiber, which results in a 22.5-nm repeat from half-staggering of 45 nm molecules, it has been hypothesized that forced unfolding of fibrin molecules during fiber elongation must result in an increase of this periodicity. Using small angle X-ray scattering as readout of the molecular length, it was shown that the position of the peak corresponding to the 22.5-nm spacing does not change significantly as the clot is stretched. Instead, an increase in sample disorder was reveled consistent with an increasing number of molecules unfolding non-uniformly in response to the large strain [40]. This behavior is expected for two-state-like extension in which some molecules extend completely while others remain folded. These molecular structural transitions begin at strains of about 1.2, at which point some compact structures become unfolded and the clots begin to strain-harden as the unfolded domains are stretched.

The mechanically unfolded sub-molecular structures in fibrin other than the α-helical coiled-coils have been identified in single-molecule forced unfolding experiments. Unfolding experiments on single fibrinogen molecules and naturally occurring fibrin polymers yield results that are nearly impossible to interpret, because the structures are so complex and irregular that many unfolding events are possible. To get around these problems, single-stranded fibrinogen oligomers (tandems) have been prepared and the unfolding of fibrinogen domains has been measured by single-molecule atomic force microscopy [90, 94]. In addition, computer-based modeling of the experimental data enabled the visualization of the various structural transitions and to relate them to the force signals observed in the experimental or simulated force-extension curves. It turned out that molecular elongation of fibrin(ogen) (without considering the αC regions) is largely determined by the combined sequential unfolding transitions in the C-terminal γ chain nodules and limited reversible extension-contraction of the α-helical coiled-coil connectors. The enthalpy of mechanical unfolding of the full-length fibrin(ogen) monomer is ΔHFg= 1520 kcal/mol.

In addition to the coiled-coil connectors and the γ nodules, fibrin mechanics is significantly affected by the relatively unstructured αC regions arranged into the factor XIIIa-cross-linked αC polymers during formation and maturation of a fibrin clot [51, 81]. It has been shown that the transglutaminase-catalyzed covalent cross-linking of the α-chains contributes substantially to the fibrin clot stiffness and elasticity in addition to the γ-γ-crosslinking [48, 81, 84, 95], including the fast elastic recoil of stretched fibrin fibers [89]. Based on the exceptional role of the αC regions in fibrin mechanics, a structural model of fibrinogen has been proposed that captures the stress-strain behavior of individual fibrin fibers [82].

Modeling fibrin mechanical properties

To describe, explain, and predict the behavior of fibrin networks upon mechanical deformations, a number of models (all incomplete) have been proposed based on various experimental data and/or theoretical arguments. It is noteworthy that modeling fibrin structure and mechanics is a particular case of modeling filamentous networks, which has a long history presented in Purohit et al. [70]. Here we provide examples of theoretical approaches to fibrin mechanics.

A fundamental model proposed by Qi et al. [96] for random networks of folded proteins uses a system of connected fibers. Although this model is not explicitly based on the microscopic structure of the network, it has been shown to accurately describe other random networks and serves to connect the microscopic and macroscopic mechanical properties. Classical thermodynamic arguments from continuum mechanics are used to obtain an expression for the force-extension (or stress-strain) relation of the network in terms of the force-extension relation of a single fiber. This force-extension relation models the molecules making up the fiber as two-state systems that can be either folded, in which case the fiber is modeled as a linear spring, or unfolded, in which case it is modeled as a worm-like chain [97]. The original model of Qi et al. does not include any volume change, so it was modified by associating a volume decrease with the structural transition at the molecular level [70]. By fitting the high-strain portion of the curve, the fractional volume change per domain can be determined. Then, with no further fitting, the observed volume drop in the earlier part of the curve is captured using the same parameters as those used to fit the force-extension curve. This increases confidence in the model and also suggests a connection between clot shrinkage and a molecular structural transition, perhaps as a result of protein aggregation to bury hydrophobic residues that were exposed during forced protein unfolding [70].

An alternative model of filamentous gels starts from the assumption that the homogeneous, isotropic networks are built of semiflexible fibers that experience thermal fluctuations. This model predicts that in response to a stretching force the fluctuations are reduced which leads to an increase of the stress. The mechanical behavior of the network is determined by extension of the individual fiber and that is why stiffness increases with strain. With these assumptions, the model can be used to compute the mechanical properties of the fibrin network after choosing a fiber force-extension curve [39]. A similar model was later extended to explain negative normal stress in semiflexible polymers as a consequence of fiber buckling of a significant fraction of the polymer. In addition to elastic nonlinearities of the filaments, geometric nonlinearities of the network as a whole also give rise to negative normal stresses [98].

The model of wormlike semiflexible polymers was used with respect to the fine structure of a fibrin fiber [48]. The phenomenon of strain-stiffening in fibrin networks has been analyzed experimentally and modeled with emphasis on formation of a bundle-like structure within fibrin fibers comprising either protofibrils or the αC regions. Notably, this model does not include molecular unfolding and suggests that fibrin clots break before the monomers are fully unfolded, which, at least in part, may be because of low strains applied and the inherent differences between shear- and tension-induced fibrin deformations. This model of the elasticity of fibrin based on the extension of bundled protofibrils within the fibers has been extended recently with the focus on the tightness of coupling between protofibrils that can be modulated by factor XIIIa-mediated crosslinking [99]. Based on stretching experiments with non-linear mechanical behavior of individual fibrin fibers, Hudson et al. [47] used a worm-like chain model of a single fiber to describe the high strain behavior of the entire network.

Fibrin mechanics was studied and modeled under simultaneous uniaxial compression or extension combined with shear deformations that better mimic multidirectional strains occurring in vivo [100]. A complex interplay between shear and Young's moduli in response to these complex deformations was modeled based on undulations, bending, and buckling of individual fibers. Changes in shear elasticity after stepwise extension or compression of a fibrin network have been modeled at the network level also with bendable and stretchable fibers, which explained the softening/stiffening behavior for fixed lateral boundaries in 2D and 3D networks [101]. Analysis of the non-uniformity of fibrin network structure with synchronous measurement of the fibrin storage and loss moduli at increasing degrees of compression enabled the modeling of the compressive behavior of fibrin networks using the theory of cellular solids or foams [102].

A number of models for fibrin mechanics have been proposed that take into account nonaffine network rearrangements, including fiber bending, stretching and alignment [69, 103, 104]. A constitutive model has been proposed to describe the time-dependent, nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of fibrin networks in large amplitude oscillatory shear deformation. The model describes the softening, strain stiffening, and increasing viscous dissipation that occur during multiple deformation cycles [105, 106]. The mechanical properties of fibrin gels under uniaxial strains have been analyzed at low fibrin concentrations, which revealed the strain-hardening properties of fibrin gels for strain amplitude below 5%. This nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of the gels has been precisely analyzed through numerical simulations of the overall gel response to the strain step sequences [107].

Fibrin as a biomaterial

An additional impetus to study fibrin mechanics came from biomedical engineering [108-111], since fibrin turns out to be very promising for many applications, such as a delivery vehicle for cells, drugs, growth factors, and genes, tissue engineering, and stiffness-controlled cell behavior on fibrin matrices. Mechanical properties of fibrin clots are extremely important for their clinical use as tissue sealants.

Tissue engineering is aimed at regeneration of damaged organs and their parts via the use of functionally active cells embedded in a biocompatible scaffold, most often based on filamentous proteins comprising extracellular matrix. Fibrin has been extensively used as a biopolymer scaffold in tissue engineering for a number of unique biological and physical characteristics, including its deformability and elasticity [112]. Fibrin alone or in combination with other materials has been used as a biological scaffold for stem or primary cells to regenerate adipose tissue, bone, cardiac tissue, cartilage, liver, nervous tissue, ocular tissue, skin, tendons, and ligaments. Thus, fibrin is a versatile biopolymer, which shows a great potential in tissue regeneration and wound healing. Some examples of the use of fibrin for tissue engineering include fibrin-alginate matrices for in vitro ovarian follicle development [113], collagen-fibrin matrices polymerized using ancrod snake venom enzyme [114], the use of fibrin polymerization holes for the delivery of therapeutic proteins functionalized with knobs [115], building of cardiac tissue on a fibrin scaffold [116], regeneration of the nucleus pulposus using silk-fibrin/hyaluronic acid composite gels [117], stimulation of angiogenesis [118], etc. Although fibrin can be used as the only biomaterial, it has been shown that addition of collagen to fibrin hydrogel can provide extra stiffness and durability of the forming biomaterial [119]. Composite fibrin-collagen matrices were shown to be permissive to endothelial network formation in vitro [120] and in vivo [121]. Mixing of atelocollagen with fibrin glue more effectively sealed pulmonary air leakage due to the increased elasticity of the glue while its adhesion strength decreased [122].

Gels based on fibrin, alone or in combination with gelatin, collagen, or elastin, have been used to optimize cellular activities, including differentiation, proliferation, and changes in morphology [123-126]. The ability of cells to modify their phenotype and behavior in response to variations in the stiffness of a fibrin-containing substrate (mechanosensing) has been used, e.g., in regulation of neurite outgrowth in fibrin gels [127] and modulation of the secretory activity of endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells [120].

Fibrin sealants are usually formed by mixing thrombin and concentrated (up to 60 mg/ml) pathogen-free fibrinogen followed by application to a bleeding wound to achieve hemostasis (comprehensive information on fibrin glues and their applications [128]). In some fibrin sealants, other components are added, such as factor XIII or tranexamic acid (an inhibitor of fibrinolysis) to improve mechanical and chemical stability of the glue. Hemostatic efficacy of these glues has been demonstrated in cardiovascular and thoracic, plastic and reconstructive surgeries, neurosurgery, ophthalmology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, etc. [21, 129]. Various commercially available fibrin sealants have diverse mechanical properties [130] and glues with distinct structure and stiffness had different clinical outcomes [131]. Although the overall beneficial effects of fibrin glues has been demonstrated in clinical trials and numerous studies, the comparison between properties of different fibrin sealants remains difficult because of the lack of standardization, quite variable formulations and testing conditions.

Concluding remarks

Although the mechanical properties of fibrin have been studied systematically since fibrinogen was first purified on a large scale more than 70 years ago, most of what we now know of the molecular origins of fibrin's mechanical properties has been discovered in the past 10 years. More recently, it was proposed that these studies are helping to define a new and highly promising field called biomechanics in hemostasis and thrombosis [132]. At the same time that the biophysical and computational approaches used for these studies are pushing current technology, it has become all the more evident that the clinical implications of the biomechanics of fibrin are vitally important. The youth of this field and the incompleteness of our understanding are reflected in the large gaps in our knowledge that are apparent in what is described in this review, but the vibrancy and promise of this field are evident in the recent discoveries, including some published in other articles that are part of this issue.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Oleg Kim (University of California, Riverside) and Dr. Artem Zhmurov (Moscow University of Physics and Technology) for their help with preparation of some figures used in this review.

Funding

Some of the authors’ work mentioned here was supported by NIH grants NHLBI HL090774 and UO1HL116330, and NSF grant DMR1505662.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

Nothing to declare.

References

  • 1.Ferry JD, Morrison PR. Preparation and properties of serum and plasma proteins; the conversion of human fibrinogen to fibrin under various conditions. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1947;69:388–400. doi: 10.1021/ja01194a066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bale MD, Ferry JD. Strain enhancement of elastic modulus in fine fibrin clots. Thromb. Res. 1988;52:565–572. doi: 10.1016/0049-3848(88)90129-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bale MD, Muller MF, Ferry JD. Rheological studies of creep and creep recovery of unligated fibrin clots: comparison of clots prepared with thrombin and ancrod. Biopolymers. 1985;24:461–482. doi: 10.1002/bip.360240304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shimizu A, Ferry JD. Clots of beta-fibrin. Viscoelastic properties, temperature dependence of elasticity, and interaction with fibrinogen-binding tetrapeptides. Biophys. J. 1988;53:311–8. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(88)83108-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gersh KC, Edmondson KE, Weisel JW. Flow rate and fibrin fiber alignment. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;8:2826–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.04118.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Campbell RA, Aleman M, Gray LD, Falvo MR, Wolberg AS. Flow profoundly influences fibrin network structure: implications for fibrin formation and clot stability in haemostasis. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;104:1281–1284. doi: 10.1160/TH10-07-0442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Flamm MH, Diamond SL. Multiscale systems biology and physics of thrombosis under flow. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2012;40:2355–2364. doi: 10.1007/s10439-012-0557-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Javerth L, Muenster S, Weitz DA. The mechanical mechanism of platelet induced clot stiffening. Biophys. J. 2013;104:150a. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lam WA, Chaudhuri O, Crow A, Webster KD, Li TD, Kita A, Huang J, Fletcher DA. Mechanics and contraction dynamics of single platelets and implications for clot stiffening. Nat. Mater. 2011;10:61–66. doi: 10.1038/nmat2903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ashton JH, Vande Geest JP, Simon BR, Haskett DG. Compressive mechanical properties of the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms and fibrin-based thrombus mimics. J. Biomech. 2009;42:197–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gasser TC, Gorgulu G, Folkesson M, Swedenborg J. Failure properties of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm under static and pulsating mechanical loads. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008;48:179–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tong J, Cohnert T, Regitnig P, Kohlbacher J, Birner-Gruenberger R, Schriefl AJ, Sommer G, Holzapfel GA. Variations of dissection properties and mass fractions with thrombus age in human abdominal aortic aneurysms. J. Biomech. 2014;47:14–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Virag L, Wilson JS, Humphrey JD, Karsaj I. A Computational Model of Biochemomechanical Effects of Intraluminal Thrombus on the Enlargement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015;43:2852–2867. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1354-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tran R, Myers DR, Ciciliano J, Trybus Hardy EL, Sakurai Y, Ahn B, Qiu Y, Mannino RG, Fay ME, Lam WA. Biomechanics of haemostasis and thrombosis in health and disease: from the macro- to molecular scale. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013;17:579–596. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown AC, Barker TH. Fibrin-based biomaterials: modulation of macroscopic properties through rational design at the molecular level. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:1502–1514. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nelb GW, Kamykowski GW, Ferry JD. Rheology of fibrin clots. V. Shear modulus, creep, and creep recovery of fine unligated clots. Biophys. Chem. 1981;13:15–23. doi: 10.1016/0301-4622(81)80020-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chernysh IN, Nagaswami C, Purohit PK, Weisel JW. Fibrin clots are equilibrium polymers that can be remodeled without proteolytic digestion. Sci. Rep. 2012;2:879. doi: 10.1038/srep00879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weisel JW. The mechanical properties of fibrin for basic scientists and clinicians. Biophys. Chem. 2004;112:267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2004.07.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bolliger D, Seeberger MD, Tanaka KA. Principles and practice of thromboelastography in clinical coagulation management and transfusion practice. Transfus. Med. Rev. 2012;26:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ganter MT, Hofer CK. Coagulation monitoring: current techniques and clinical use of viscoelastic point-of-care coagulation devices. Anesth. Analg. 2008;106:1366–1375. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jackson MR, MacPhee MJ, Drohan WN, Alving BM. Fibrin sealant: current and potential clinical applications. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 1996;7:737–746. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luddington RJ. Thrombelastography/thromboelastometry. Clin. Lab. Haematol. 2005;27:81–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2005.00681.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Evans PA, Hawkins K, Williams PR. Rheometry for blood coagulation studies. Rheology Rev. 2006:255–291. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Solomon C, Schochl H, Ranucci M, Schott U, Schlimp CJ. Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox (R)) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM (R)). Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest. 2015;75:239–246. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.993698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Feller T, Kellermayer MS, Kiss B. Nano-thrombelastography of fibrin during blood plasma clotting. J. Struct. Biol. 2014;186:462–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2014.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Markert CD, Guo X, Skardal A, Wang Z, Bharadwaj S, Zhang Y, Bonin K, Guthold M. Characterizing the micro-scale elastic modulus of hydrogels for use in regenerative medicine. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2013;27:115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wu G, Krebs CR, Lin FC, Wolberg AS, Oldenburg AL. High sensitivity micro-elastometry: applications in blood coagulopathy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2013;41:2120–2129. doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0817-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Abou-Saleh RH, Connell SD, Harrand R, Ajjan RA, Mosesson MW, Smith DA, Grant PJ, Ariens RA. Nanoscale probing reveals that reduced stiffness of clots from fibrinogen lacking 42 N-terminal Bbeta-chain residues is due to the formation of abnormal oligomers. Biophys. J. 2009;96:2415–2427. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.12.3913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Allan P, Uitte de Willige S, Abou-Saleh RH, Connell SD, Ariens RA. Evidence that fibrinogen gamma' directly interferes with protofibril growth: implications for fibrin structure and clot stiffness. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2012;10:1072–1080. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2012.04717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Domingues MM, Macrae FL, Duval C, McPherson HR, Bridge KI, Ajjan RA, Ridger VC, Connell SD, Philippou H, Ariens RA. Thrombin and fibrinogen gamma' impact clot structure by marked effects on intrafibrillar structure and protofibril packing. Blood. 2016;127:487–495. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-06-652214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Badiei N, Sowedan AM, Curtis DJ, Brown MR, Lawrence MJ, Campbell AI, Sabra A, Evans PA, Weisel JW, Chernysh IN, Nagaswami C, Williams PR, Hawkins K. Effects of unidirectional flow shear stresses on the formation, fractal microstructure and rigidity of incipient whole blood clots and fibrin gels. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 2015;60:451–464. doi: 10.3233/CH-151924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Davies NA, Harrison NK, Morris RH, Noble S, Lawrence MJ, D'Silva LA, Broome L, Brown MR, Hawkins KM, Williams PR, Davidson S, Evans PA. Fractal dimension (df) as a new structural biomarker of clot microstructure in different stages of lung cancer. Thromb. Haemost. 2015;114:1251–1259. doi: 10.1160/TH15-04-0357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lawrence MJ, Sabra A, Mills G, Pillai SG, Abdullah W, Hawkins K, Morris RH, Davidson SJ, D'Silva LA, Curtis DJ, Brown MR, Weisel JW, Williams PR, Evans PA. A new biomarker quantifies differences in clot microstructure in patients with venous thromboembolism. Br. J. Haematol. 2015;168:571–575. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Martinez MR, Cuker A, Mills AM, Crichlow A, Lightfoot RT, Chernysh IN, Nagaswami C, Weisel JW, Ischiropoulos H. Enhanced lysis and accelerated establishment of viscoelastic properties of fibrin clots are associated with pulmonary embolism. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2014;306:L397–L404. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00265.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Collet JP, Allali Y, Lesty C, Tanguy ML, Silvain J, Ankri A, Blanchet B, Dumaine R, Gianetti J, Payot L, Weisel JW, Montalescot G. Altered fibrin architecture is associated with hypofibrinolysis and premature coronary atherothrombosis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2006;26:2567–2573. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000241589.52950.4c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qiu Y, Brown AC, Myers DR, Sakurai Y, Mannino RG, Tran R, Ahn B, Hardy ET, Kee MF, Kumar S, Bao G, Barker TH, Lam WA. Platelet mechanosensing of substrate stiffness during clot formation mediates adhesion, spreading, and activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2014;111:14430–14435. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322917111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Weiss HL, Selvaraj P, Okita K, Matsumoto Y, Voie A, Hoelscher T, Szeri AJ. Mechanical clot damage from cavitation during sonothrombolysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013;133:3159–3175. doi: 10.1121/1.4795774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Janmey PA, Amis EJ, Ferry JD. Rheology of fibrin clots. VI. Stress relaxation, creep, and differential dynamic modulus of fine clots in large shearing deformations. J. Rheol. 1983;27:135–153. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Storm C, Pastore JJ, MacKintosh FC, Lubensky TC, Janmey PA. Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature. 2005;435:191–194. doi: 10.1038/nature03521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Brown AE, Litvinov RI, Discher DE, Purohit PK, Weisel JW. Multiscale mechanics of fibrin polymer: gel stretching with protein unfolding and loss of water. Science. 2009;325:741–744. doi: 10.1126/science.1172484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Savushkin AV. Clots of blood plasma. J. Eng. Physics. Thermodynamics. 2003;76:645–647. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Riha P, Wang X, Liao R, Stoltz JF. Elasticity and fracture strain of whole blood clots. Clin. Hemorheol. Microcirc. 1999;21:45–49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guthold M, Liu W, Sparks EA, Jawerth LM, Peng L, Falvo M, Superfine R, Hantgan RR, Lord ST. A comparison of the mechanical and structural properties of fibrin fibers with other protein fibers. Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 2007;49:165–181. doi: 10.1007/s12013-007-9001-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu W, Carlisle CR, Sparks EA, Guthold M. The mechanical properties of single fibrin fibers. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;8:1030–1036. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03745.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liu W, Jawerth LM, Sparks EA, Falvo MR, Hantgan RR, Superfine R, Lord ST, Guthold M. Fibrin fibers have extraordinary extensibility and elasticity. Science. 2006;313:634. doi: 10.1126/science.1127317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li W, Sigley J, Pieters M, Helms CC, Nagaswami C, Weisel JW, Guthold M. Fibrin Fiber Stiffness Is Strongly Affected by Fiber Diameter, but Not by Fibrinogen Glycation. Biophys. J. 2016;110:1400–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Hudson NE, Houser JR, O'Brien ET, 3rd, Taylor RM, 2nd, Superfine R, Lord ST, Falvo MR. Stiffening of individual fibrin fibers equitably distributes strain and strengthens networks. Biophys. J. 2010;98:1632–1640. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Piechocka IK, Bacabac RG, Potters M, Mackintosh FC, Koenderink GH. Structural hierarchy governs fibrin gel mechanics. Biophys. J. 2010;98:2281–2289. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Collet JP, Shuman H, Ledger RE, Lee S, Weisel JW. The elasticity of an individual fibrin fiber in a clot. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2005;102:9133–9137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504120102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kim OV, Litvinov RI, Weisel JW, Alber MS. Structural basis for the nonlinear mechanics of fibrin networks under compression. Biomaterials. 2014;35:6739–6749. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.04.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kurniawan NA, Grimbergen J, Koopman J, Koenderink GH. Factor XIII stiffens fibrin clots by causing fiber compaction. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2014;12:1687–1696. doi: 10.1111/jth.12705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ryan EA, Mockros LF, Weisel JW, Lorand L. Structural origins of fibrin clot rheology. Biophys. J. 1999;77:2813–2826. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77113-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Henderson SJ, Xia J, Wu H, Stafford AR, Leslie BA, Fredenburgh JC, Weitz DA, Weitz JI. Zinc promotes clot stability by accelerating clot formation and modifying fibrin structure. Thromb. Haemost. 2016;115:533–542. doi: 10.1160/TH15-06-0462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Munster S, Jawerth LM, Fabry B, Weitz DA. Structure and mechanics of fibrin clots formed under mechanical perturbation. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;11:557–560. doi: 10.1111/jth.12123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jansen KA, Bacabac RG, Piechocka IK, Koenderink GH. Cells actively stiffen fibrin networks by generating contractile stress. Biophys. J. 2013;105:2240–2251. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Averett RD. Experimental mechanics of magnetic microparticle-induced strain on fibrin clots. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2014;102:4365–4370. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kotlarchyk MA, Shreim SG, Alvarez-Elizondo MB, Estrada LC, Singh R, Valdevit L, Kniazeva E, Gratton E, Putnam AJ, Botvinick EL. Concentration independent modulation of local micromechanics in a fibrin gel. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhu S, Herbig BA, Li R, Colace TV, Muthard RW, Neeves KB, Diamond SL. In microfluidico: Recreating in vivo hemodynamics using miniaturized devices. Biorheology. 2015;52:303–318. doi: 10.3233/BIR-15065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Brown AC, Baker SR, Douglas AM, Keating M, Alvarez-Elizondo MB, Botvinick EL, Guthold M, Barker TH. Molecular interference of fibrin's divalent polymerization mechanism enables modulation of multiscale material properties. Biomaterials. 2015;49:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Weigandt KM, White N, Chung D, Ellingson E, Wang Y, Fu X, Pozzo DC. Fibrin clot structure and mechanics associated with specific oxidation of methionine residues in fibrinogen. Biophys. J. 2012;103:2399–2407. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lauricella AM, Castanon MM, Kordich LC, Quintana IL. Alterations of fibrin network structure mediated by dermatan sulfate. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis. 2013;35:257–263. doi: 10.1007/s11239-012-0804-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rojas AM, Kordich L, Lauricella AM. Homocysteine modifies fibrin clot deformability: another possible explanation of harm. Biorheology. 2009;46:379–387. doi: 10.3233/BIR-2009-0459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wen Q, Janmey PA. Effects of non-linearity on cell-ECM interactions. Exp Cell Res. 2013;319:2481–2489. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Bucay I, O'Brien ET, 3rd, Wulfe SD, Superfine R, Wolberg AS, Falvo MR, Hudson NE. Physical determinants of fibrinolysis in single fibrin fibers. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0116350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Varju I, Sotonyi P, Machovich R, Szabo L, Tenekedjiev K, Silva MM, Longstaff C, Kolev K. Hindered dissolution of fibrin formed under mechanical stress. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011;9:979–986. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04203.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rottenberger Z, Komorowicz E, Szabo L, Bota A, Varga Z, Machovich R, Longstaff C, Kolev K. Lytic and mechanical stability of clots composed of fibrin and blood vessel wall components. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;11:529–538. doi: 10.1111/jth.12112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Longstaff C, Varju I, Sotonyi P, Szabo L, Krumrey M, Hoell A, Bota A, Varga Z, Komorowicz E, Kolev K. Mechanical stability and fibrinolytic resistance of clots containing fibrin, DNA, and histones. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:6946–6956. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.404301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wufsus AR, Rana K, Brown A, Dorgan JR, Liberatore MW, Neeves KB. Elastic behavior and platelet retraction in low- and high-density fibrin gels. Biophys. J. 2015;108:173–183. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.11.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kang H, Wen Q, Janmey PA, Tang JX, Conti E, MacKintosh FC. Nonlinear elasticity of stiff filament networks: strain stiffening, negative normal stress, and filament alignment in fibrin gels. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2009;113:3799–3805. doi: 10.1021/jp807749f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Purohit PK, Litvinov RI, Brown AE, Discher DE, Weisel JW. Protein unfolding accounts for the unusual mechanical behavior of fibrin networks. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:2374–2383. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Litvinov RI, Faizullin DA, Zuev YF, Weisel JW. The alpha-helix to beta-sheet transition in stretched and compressed hydrated fibrin clots. Biophys. J. 2012;103:1020–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Muller MF, Ris H, Ferry JD. Electron microscopy of fine fibrin clots and fine and coarse fibrin films. Observations of fibers in cross-section and in deformed states. J. Mol. Biol. 1984;174:369–384. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(84)90343-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lindström SB, Kulachenko A, Jawerth LM, Vader DA. Finite-strain, finite-size mechanics of rigidly cross-linked biopolymer networks. Soft Matter. 2013;9:7302–7313. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Munster S, Jawerth LM, Leslie BA, Weitz JI, Fabry B, Weitz DA. Strain history dependence of the nonlinear stress response of fibrin and collagen networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2013;110:12197–12202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222787110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Weisel JW, Litvinov RI. Adaptation of fibrous biopolymers to recurring increasing strains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci .U S A. 2013;110:12164–12165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310351110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yeromonahos C, Polack B, Caton F. Nanostructure of the fibrin clot. Biophys. J. 2010;99:2018–2027. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lim BB, Lee EH, Sotomayor M, Schulten K. Molecular basis of fibrin clot elasticity. Structure. 2008;16:449–59. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2007.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Averett LE, Geer CB, Fuierer RR, Akhremitchev BB, Gorkun OV, Schoenfisch MH. Complexity of “A-a” knob-hole fibrin interaction revealed by atomic force spectroscopy. Langmuir. 2008;24:4979–4988. doi: 10.1021/la703264x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Averett LE, Schoenfisch MH, Akhremitchev BB, Gorkun OV. Kinetics of the multistep rupture of fibrin ‘A-a’ polymerization interactions measured using atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 2009;97:2820–2828. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tsurupa G, Pechik I, Litvinov RI, Hantgan RR, Tjandra N, Weisel JW, Medved L. On the mechanism of alphaC polymer formation in fibrin. Biochemistry. 2012;51:2526–2538. doi: 10.1021/bi2017848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Collet JP, Moen JL, Veklich YI, Gorkun OV, Lord ST, Montalescot G, Weisel JW. The alphaC domains of fibrinogen affect the structure of the fibrin clot, its physical properties, and its susceptibility to fibrinolysis. Blood. 2005;106:3824–3830. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-05-2150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Averett RD, Menn B, Lee EH, Helms CC, Barker T, Guthold M. A modular fibrinogen model that captures the stress-strain behavior of fibrin fibers. Biophys. J. 2012;103:1537–1544. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.08.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Falvo MR, Gorkun OV, Lord ST. The molecular origins of the mechanical properties of fibrin. Biophys. Chem. 2010;152:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Helms CC, Ariens RA, Uitte de Willige S, Standeven KF, Guthold M. alpha-alpha Cross-links increase fibrin fiber elasticity and stiffness. Biophys. J. 2012;102:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ping L, Huang L, Cardinali B, Profumo A, Gorkun OV, Lord ST. Substitution of the human alphaC region with the analogous chicken domain generates a fibrinogen with severely impaired lateral aggregation: fibrin monomers assemble into protofibrils but protofibrils do not assemble into fibers. Biochemistry. 2011;50:9066–9075. doi: 10.1021/bi201094v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Westbury SK, Duval C, Philippou H, Brown R, Lee KR, Murden SL, Phillips E, Reilly-Stitt C, Whalley D, Ariens RA, Mumford AD. Partial deletion of the alphaC-domain in the Fibrinogen Perth variant is associated with thrombosis, increased clot strength and delayed fibrinolysis. Thromb. Haemost. 2013;110:1135–1144. doi: 10.1160/TH13-05-0408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Carlisle CR, Sparks EA, Der Loughian C, Guthold M. Strength and failure of fibrin fiber branchpoints. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;8:1135–1138. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03824.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gersh KC, Nagaswami C, Weisel JW, Lord ST. The presence of gamma' chain impairs fibrin polymerization. Thromb. Res. 2009;124:356–363. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.11.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hudson NE, Ding F, Bucay I, O'Brien ET, 3rd, Gorkun OV, Superfine R, Lord ST, Dokholyan NV, Falvo MR. Submillisecond elastic recoil reveals molecular origins of fibrin fiber mechanics. Biophys. J. 2013;104:2671–2680. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.04.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhmurov A, Brown AE, Litvinov RI, Dima RI, Weisel JW, Barsegov V. Mechanism of fibrin(ogen) forced unfolding. Structure. 2011;19:1615–1624. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2011.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bailey K, Astbury WT, Rudall KM. Fibrinogen and fibrin as members of the keratin-myosin group. Nature. 1943;151:716–717. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhmurov A, Kononova O, Litvinov RI, Dima RI, Barsegov V, Weisel JW. Mechanical transition from α-helical coiled coils to β-sheets in fibrin(ogen). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012;134:20396–20402. doi: 10.1021/ja3076428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Miserez A, Guerette PA. Phase transition-induced elasticity of alpha-helical bioelastomeric fibres and networks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:1973–1995. doi: 10.1039/c2cs35294j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Brown AE, Litvinov RI, Discher DE, Weisel JW. Forced unfolding of coiled-coils in fibrinogen by single-molecule AFM. Biophys. J. 2007;92:L39–L41. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.101261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Duval C, Allan P, Connell SD, Ridger VC, Philippou H, Ariens RA. Roles of fibrin alpha- and gamma-chain specific cross-linking by FXIIIa in fibrin structure and function. Thromb. Haemost. 2014;111:842–850. doi: 10.1160/TH13-10-0855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Qi HJ, Ortiz C, Boyce MC. Mechanics of biomacromolecular networks containing folded domains. J. Eng. Mater.Technol. 2006;128:509–518. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Bustamante C, Marko JF, Siggia ED, Smith S. Entropic elasticity of lambda-phage DNA. Science. 1994;265:1599–1600. doi: 10.1126/science.8079175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Cioroianu AR, Storm C. Normal stresses in elastic networks. Phys. Rev. E. 2013;88:052601. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.052601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Piechocka IK, Jansen KA, Broedersz CP, Kurniawan NA, MacKintosh FC, Koenderink GH. Multi-scale strain-stiffening of semiflexible bundle networks. Soft Matter. 2016;12:2145–56. doi: 10.1039/c5sm01992c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.van Oosten AS, Vahabi M, Licup AJ, Sharma A, Galie PA, MacKintosh FC, Janmey PA. Uncoupling shear and uniaxial elastic moduli of semiflexible biopolymer networks: compression-softening and stretch-stiffening. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:19270. doi: 10.1038/srep19270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Vahabi M, Sharma A, Licup AJ, van Oosten AS, Galie PA, Janmey PA, MacKintosh FC. Elasticity of fibrous networks under uniaxial prestress. Soft Matter. 2016;12:5050–60. doi: 10.1039/c6sm00606j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kim OV, Liang X, Litvinov RI, Weisel JW, Alber MS, Purohit PK. Foam-like compression behavior of fibrin networks. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2016;15:213–228. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0683-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kim E, Kim OV, Machlus KR, Liu X, Kupaev T, Lioi J, Wolberg AS, Chen DZ, Rosen ED, Xua Z, Alber MS. Correlation between fibrin network structure and mechanical properties: an experimental and computational analysis. Soft Matter. 2011;7:4983–4992. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Onck PR, Koeman T, van Dillen T, van der Giessen E. Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005;95:178102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.178102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.van Kempen TH, Donders WP, van de Vosse FN, Peters GW. A constitutive model for developing blood clots with various compositions and their nonlinear viscoelastic behavior. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2016;15:279–291. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0686-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.van Kempen TH, Peters GW, van de Vosse FN. A constitutive model for the time-dependent, nonlinear stress response of fibrin networks. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2015;14:995–1006. doi: 10.1007/s10237-015-0649-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Benkherourou M, Gumery P-Y, Tranqui L, Tracqui P. Quantification and macroscopic modeling of the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of strained gels with varying fibrin concentrations IEEE Transactions on Biomed. Eng. 2000;47:1465–1475. doi: 10.1109/10.880098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Ferry JD, Morrison PR. Fibrin film and other products from human plasma. Indust. Eng. Chem. 1946;38:1217–1221. [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Ferry JD. The conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin: events and recollections from 1942 to 1982. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 1983;408:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb23229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ferry JD, Morrison PR. Preparation and properties of serum and plasma proteins: human fibrin in the form of an elastic film. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1947;69:400–409. doi: 10.1021/ja01194a067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Janmey PA, Winer JP, Weisel JW. Fibrin gels and their clinical and bioengineering applications. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2009;6:1–10. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2008.0327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Ahmed TA, Dare EV, Hincke M. Fibrin: a versatile scaffold for tissue engineering applications. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 2008;14:199–215. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2007.0435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Shikanov A, Xu M, Woodruff TK, Shea LD. Interpenetrating fibrin-alginate matrices for in vitro ovarian follicle development. Biomaterials. 2009;30:5476–85. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.06.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Rowe SL, Stegemann JP. Microstructure and mechanics of collagen-fibrin matrices polymerized using ancrod snake venom enzyme. J. Biomech. Eng. 2009;131:061012. doi: 10.1115/1.3128673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Soon AS, Stabenfeldt SE, Brown WE, Barker TH. Engineering fibrin matrices: the engagement of polymerization pockets through fibrin knob technology for the delivery and retention of therapeutic proteins. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1944–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Barsotti MC, Felice F, Balbarini A, Di Stefano R. Fibrin as a scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2011;58:301–310. doi: 10.1002/bab.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Park SH, Cho H, Gil ES, Mandal BB, Min BH, Kaplan DL. Silk-fibrin/hyaluronic acid composite gels for nucleus pulposus tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2011;17:2999–3009. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Chung E, Rytlewski JA, Merchant AG, Dhada KS, Lewis EW, Suggs LJ. Fibrin-based 3D matrices induce angiogenic behavior of adipose-derived stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:78–88. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lai VK, Lake SP, Frey CR, Tranquillo RT, Barocas VH. Mechanical behavior of collagen-fibrin co-gels reflects transition from series to parallel interactions with increasing collagen content. J. Biomech. Eng. 2012;134:011004. doi: 10.1115/1.4005544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rao RR, Peterson AW, Ceccarelli J, Putnam AJ, Stegemann JP. Matrix composition regulates three-dimensional network formation by endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen/fibrin materials. Angiogenesis. 2012;15:253–64. doi: 10.1007/s10456-012-9257-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Rao RR, Ceccarelli J, Vigen ML, Gudur M, Singh R, Deng CX, Putnam AJ, Stegemann JP. Effects of hydroxyapatite on endothelial network formation in collagen/fibrin composite hydrogels in vitro and in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2014;10:3091–3097. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Nomori H, Horio H, Suemasu K. Mixing collagen with fibrin glue to strengthen the sealing effect for pulmonary air leakage. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000;70:1666–1670. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01936-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chaterji S, Kwon IK, Park K. Smart Polymeric Gels: Redefining the Limits of Biomedical Devices. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2007;32:1083–1122. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Dikovsky D, Bianco-Peled H, Seliktar D. The effect of structural alterations of PEG-fibrinogen hydrogel scaffolds on 3-D cellular morphology and cellular migration. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1496–1506. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Natesan S, Zhang G, Baer DG, Walters TJ, Christy RJ, Suggs LJ. A bilayer construct controls adipose-derived stem cell differentiation into endothelial cells and pericytes without growth factor stimulation. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2011;17:941–953. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shevchenko RV, James SL, James SE. A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2010;7:229–258. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Man AJ, Davis HE, Itoh A, Leach JK, Bannerman P. Neurite outgrowth in fibrin gels is regulated by substrate stiffness. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2011;17:2931–2942. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2011.0030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Catelas I. Fibrin. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering. Comprehensive Biomaterials. 2011;2:303–328. [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Laurens N, Koolwijk P, de Maat MP. Fibrin structure and wound healing. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2006;4:932–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2006.01861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hickerson WL, Nur I, Meidler R. A comparison of the mechanical, kinetic, and biochemical properties of fibrin clots formed with two different fibrin sealants. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2011;22:19–23. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0b013e32833fcbfb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Ferguson J, Gruber-Blum S, Brand J, Mika K, Redl H. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of hernia mesh fixation by fibrin sealant. J. Surg. Res. 2011;171:576–581. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Weisel JW. Biomechanics in hemostasis and thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010;8:1027–1029. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03808.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Klotzsch E, Smith ML, Kubow KE, Muntwyler S, Little WC, Beyeler F, Gourdon D, Nelson BJ, Vogel V. Fibronectin forms the most extensible biological fibers displaying switchable force-exposed cryptic binding sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009;106:18267–18272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907518106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES