Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2017 Feb 20;2017:bcr2016218657. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2016-218657

Triple-negative breast cancer with brain metastasis in a pregnant woman

Francisco Trinca 1, Mariana Inácio 1, Teresa Timóteo 2, Rui Dinis 1
PMCID: PMC5318606  PMID: 28219911

Abstract

A woman aged 35 years was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer in October 2012. During the investigation, it was discovered that she was pregnant, the patient decided to have an abortion. She was submitted to a radical modified mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy followed by adjuvant breast radiotherapy of the left breast. 2 months after the adjuvant treatment, she began to have headaches and dizziness. The cranial MRI (head MRI) showed brain metastasis. She was then treated with whole brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery and concomitant temozolomide which resulted in complete response. 1.5 year later, she was able to get pregnant and gave birth to a baby without complications. The previous imaging reassessment performed in September 2016 shows no evidence of recurrent breast cancer.

Background

Breast cancer during pregnancy is very rare and diagnosed in about 1 pregnant woman out of 3000.1

Breast cancer is also one of the most common malignancies that cause central nervous system (CNS) metastasis.2 The 10-year incidence of CNS involvement in early-stage breast cancer is 5.2%;3 and 10–15% of the patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) develop CNS metastasis.4 However, considering previous autopsy series, the real incidence of CNS metastases in MBC patients is probably higher and detected in ∼30% of the patients.5 6

The prognosis of patients with breast cancer who develop brain metastases is influenced by several factors. Tumour subtypes have been related with the prognosis and the overall survival of such patients.7 Considering all of the molecular subtypes, the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the one with the worst prognosis and is associated with an overall survival of 3–4 months.8 9

Case presentation

A woman aged 35 years with no personal or oncological history noted a lump in the left breast in August 2012. For this reason, an eco-mammogram was performed which showed a nodule of 25×12×34 mm in the superior-outer quadrant of the left breast.

In October 2012, she underwent a core needle biopsy that showed aspects compatible with invasive ductal carcinoma, receivers of oestrogens and progesterone negative, Cerb-B2–2 +, FISH– and Ki-67 of 100% (TNBC).

Remaining imaging studies were carried out and showed no metastatic disease.

At that time, it was discovered that she was 12 weeks pregnant. The treatment options were explained to the patient, but by a personal choice, she decided to abort.

A radical modified mastectomy was performed in November 2012. Anatomopathology showed an invasive ductal carcinoma. Of the 20 axillary nodes, 19 were with metastasis, pT3 pN3a M0, corresponding to a stage IIIC.

She underwent adjuvant chemotherapy from November 2012 to March 2013 with docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide for six cycles followed by adjuvant breast radiotherapy until May 2013.

In July 2013, she began to have headaches and dizziness during 5 days.

For this reason, a head MRI was performed which showed the presence of brain lesions in the right temporal and cortico-subcortical junction, in the region of the internal capsule, the left caudate nucleus and the right cortico-subcortical frontal and parasagittal area (figures 1 and 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Head MRI performed in July 2013 showing brain metastasis in the right temporal and cortical–subcortical junction.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Head MRI performed in July 2013 showing brain metastasis in the left caudate nucleus.

Chest–abdomen–pelvis tomography at that time showed no evidence of metastatic disease.

Between July and August 2013 was treated with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with concomitant temozolomide.

The head MRI performed in November 2013 showed an almost total regression of the metastatic lesions with only residual areas of about 1 mm in the right temporal cortex and in the left internal capsule.

The genetic studies showed no mutations in the BRCA 1 or 2 genes.

Subsequent follow-up imaging studies were without detectable lesions or evidence of disease recurrence.

In February 2015, she started having bone pain at the right ileopubic level. Imaging studies showed changes compatibles with aseptic necrosis of the head of the right femur (figure 3). Bone scintigraphy showed no metastastatic lesions.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Pelvic X-ray performed in February 2015 with changes compatibles with aseptic necrosis of the head of the right femur.

During the investigation, it was detected and later confirmed that she was 19 weeks pregnant having chosen not to end it. She was evaluated in orthopaedics and managed with conservative treatment.

She gave birth to a baby at 37 weeks without complications.

A total right hip prosthesis was placed in December 2015 (figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pelvic X-ray performed in December 2015 showing the total right hip prosthesis.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient completed WBRT, SRS and chemotherapy more than 3 years ago.

She has been on regular oncological follow-up and the previous imaging reassessment of September 2016 continues to show no evidence of recurrent breast cancer.

Discussion

Breast cancer in pregnancy increases as more women became pregnant at a later age. The management of a pregnant woman with breast cancer is challenging and involves the collaboration of a multidisciplinary team. In this case, the patient did not know that she was pregnant until the time of the diagnosis of the malignancy and opted to end the pregnancy.

TNBC is defined by the lack of receptors of oestrogen, progesterone and HER2. It is a molecular subtype that has a bad prognosis, early CNS metastasis and a short survival.10 11

In most studies, the use of WBRT extended the survival to 3–5 months.12 13

SRS is a method that delivers a high-dose fraction of ionising radiation to a small and defined target volume.14 15 It can be performed in any brain location16 and used to treat multiple brain lesions.17 18

An overall survival improvement of 1.6 months was observed in the subgroup of patients with a single brain metastasis who received WBRT and SRS.19

Patients with brain metastases from TNBC lacks targeted therapies and chemotherapy is the only systemic option.

Temozolomide is an orally administered alkylating agent with the ability to cross the blood–brain barrier.20 The efficacy of temozolomide in monotherapy is modest, but the studies combining temozolomide with WBRT reported more favourable response rates and a median overall survival of 4.1–12 months.21

The highest objective response rate in trials that combined temozolomide with radiotherapy was achieved in patients with brain metastases from advanced lung and breast cancer.22

In this case, after WBRT, SRS and concomitant temozolomide, the patient had a complete response and remains free of disease after more than 3 years.

Given the lack of effective treatment options for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases, this currently represents a field with a lot of room for improvement and in which more effective therapies are needed.23

Learning points.

  • Think about the possibility that a woman with cancer in fertile age could be pregnant.

  • In oncological patients with neurological symptoms, brain metastasis must be excluded.

  • Always consider bone metastasis in patients with bone pain.

Footnotes

Contributors: TT identified and managed the case. MI, RD and FT managed the case. All authors contributed in the writing of the paper and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Molckovsky A, Madarnas Y. Breast cancer in pregnancy: a literature review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;108:333–8. 10.1007/s10549-007-9616-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE, Davis FG et al. Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973–2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:2865–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pestalozzi BC, Zahrieh D, Price KN et al. Identifying breast cancer patients at risk for central nervous system (CNS) metastases in trials of the International breast cancer study group (IBCSG). Ann Oncol 2006;17:935–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin NU, Bellon JR, Winer EP. CNS metastases in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3608–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsukada Y, Fouad A, Pickren JW et al. Central nervous system metastasis from breast carcinoma. Autopsy study. Cancer 1983;52:2349–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cho SY, Choi HY. Causes of death and metastatic patterns in patients with mammary cancer. Ten-year autopsy study. Am J Clin Pathol 1980;73:232–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Niwinska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K. Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Ann Oncol 2010;21:942–8. 10.1093/annonc/mdp407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nam BH, Kim SY, Han HS et al. Breast cancer subtypes and survival in patients with brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R20 10.1186/bcr1870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anders CK, Deal AM, Miller CR et al. The prognostic contribution of clinical breast cancer subtype, age, and race among patients with breast cancer brain metastases. Cancer 2011;117:1602–11. 10.1002/cncr.25746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smid M, Wang Y, Zhang Y et al. Subtypes of breast cancer show preferential site of relapse. Cancer Res 2008;68:3108–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hines SL, Vallow LA, Tan WW et al. Jain A. Clinical outcomes after a diagnosis of brain metastases in patients with estrogen- and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive versus triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1561–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Borgelt B, Gelber R, Kramer S et al. The palliation of brain metastases: the final results of the first two studies by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1980;6:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Noordijk EM, Vecht CJ, Haaxma-Reiche H et al. The choice of treatment of single brain metastasis should be based on extracranial tumor activity and age. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;29:711–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Alexander E, Moriarty TM, Davis RB et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for the definitive noninvasive treatment of brain metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:34–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Coffey RJ, Flickinger JC, Bissonette DJ et al. Radiosurgery for brain metastases using the Cobalt-60 gamma unit: methods and results in 24 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991;20:1287–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD et al. A multiinstitutional experience with stereotactic radiosurgery for solitary brain metastasis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1994;28:797–802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Somaza S et al. Radiosurgery: its role in brain metastasis management. Neurosurg Clin North Am 1996;7:497–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Engenhart R, Kimmig BN, Hover KH et al. Long term follow-up for brain metastases treated by percutaneous stereotactic single high-dose irradiation. Cancer 1993;71:1353–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Andrews DW, Scott CB, Sperduto PW et al. Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial. Lancet 2004;363:1665–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16250-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baker SD, Wirth M, Statkevich P et al. Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:309–17. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chang JE, Khuntia D, Robins HI et al. Radiotherapy and radiosensitizers in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2007;5:894–902, 907–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Antonadou D, Paraskevaidis M, Sarris G et al. Phase II randomized trial of temozolomide and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3644–50. 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Leone JP, Leone BA. Breast cancer brain metastases: the last frontier. Exp Hematol Oncol 2015;4:33 10.1186/s40164-015-0028-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES