Abstract
Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) serves as a signaling molecule for adaptive responses to a variety of cytotoxic agents and plays an important role in mediating the radiation stress-induced responses that serve to mitigate or repair the injurious effects of γ radiation on the body. Indeed, low doses of radiation may have a net beneficial effect by activating a variety of protective mechanisms, including antitumor immune responses. On the other hand, ATP signaling may be involved in the radiation resistance of cancer cells. Here, focusing on our previous work, we review the evidence that low-dose γ irradiation (0.25-0.5 Gy) induces release of extracellular ATP, and that the released ATP mediates multiple radiation-induced responses, including increased intracellular antioxidant synthesis, cell-mediated immune responses, induction of DNA damage repair systems, and differentiation of regulatory T cells.
Keywords: low-dose ionizing radiation, adaptive response, antioxidant, ATP signaling, cell-mediated antitumor immunity, radioresistance
Induction of Antioxidant Synthesis and Immune Function by Low Doses of Ionizing Radiation
It is well known that induction of endogenous antioxidants in organisms is one of the adaptive responses to various kinds of cytotoxic agents, including reactive oxygen species (ROS), quinone-based anticancer agents, metals, ultraviolet, and nanoparticles, as well as ionizing radiation.1-8 Many reports have described the responses to ionizing radiation,9-12 including our studies on the effects of low-dose γ rays on the enhancement of antioxidant potency in mouse and cultured cells.13-15
We examined induction of endogenous antioxidants in mice exposed once over the whole body to γ rays. Total intracellular reduced form of glutathione (GSH) in splenocytes was significantly elevated from 2 to 6 hours after 0.5 Gy postirradiation, reaching a maximum at around 4 hours and declining to the 0-time level within 24 hours. Other antioxidants, such as glutathione peroxidase (GPX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and thioredoxin (TRX), were also similarly induced,13 as was expression of the corresponding genes.14 The induction of these antioxidants is considered as one of the adaptive responses against ROS, since low-dose radiation induces ROS formation, for example, through radiolysis of water molecules.
We also examined natural killer (NK) activity, which is an index of cell-mediated immunity. The activity in mouse splenocytes after whole-body single γ irradiation at a dose of 0.5 Gy was also increased significantly from 4 to 6 hours and then declined to the nonirradiation control level by 24 hours.16
Third, we examined the effect of exogenous GSH and precursors of de novo GSH synthesis, such as cysteine (Cys), N-acetylcysteine (NAC), glycine, and glutamine, on NK activity, using splenocytes obtained from nonirradiated normal mice, to see whether GSH induced by low-dose γ irradiation was involved in the enhancement of the immune function.17 The NK activity was elevated dose dependently at GSH concentrations ranging from 0 to 5 mM. Exogenous GSH increased the cellular GSH level in a similar way. Other precursors such as Cys and NAC elevated NK activity more effectively than GSH. Furthermore, we investigated the effect of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO), a specific inhibitor of γ-glutamylcysteinyl synthetase, which is the rate-limiting enzyme of the de novo GSH synthetic pathway, on the elevated NK activity induced by the precursors. The elevation was blocked by BSO, and the extent of inhibition was in good agreement with the changes of cellular total GSH content.15,17 These results indicated that the de novo pathway of GSH synthesis is involved in modulating NK activity in mice irradiated with low-dose γ rays.
Adenosine Triphosphate Signaling
Intracellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is released into the extracellular space in response to various stimuli, including shear stress, stretch, hypoxia, inflammation, osmotic swelling, pH, ionizing and nonionizing radiations, ROS, nanoparticles, and cell death, followed by activation of purine 2 (P2) receptors.7,18-20 The P2 receptors are classified into 2 major subtypes, that is ionotropic P2X receptors and metabotropic P2Y receptors, and various physiological functions are modulated through activation of these receptors (Figure 1).21 The released ATP is rapidly metabolized to adenosine diphosphate, adenosine monophosphate, and adenosine by ectonucleotidases.22 These metabolites bind with P2X, P2Y, and/or P1 receptors with different affinities.
Figure 1.

Schematic overview of purinergic/ATP signaling. Intracellular ATP is released into the extracellular space in response to various stimuli. The released ATP is rapidly metabolized to ADP, AMP, and adenosine, and these metabolites bind with P2X, P2Y, and/or P1 receptors, respectively, and activate receptors with a different concentration, leading to downstream signaling. ATP indicates adenosine triphosphate; ADP, adenosine diphosphate; AMP, adenosine monophosphate; P2, purine 2.
Various ATP release pathways have been reported, including a maxi-anion channel, P2X7 receptor/pore, a volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying chloride channel, a member of the ATP-binding cassette protein family, a gap junction hemichannel, and vesicular exocytosis (Figure 2).19,23-30 The ATP released from cells through these pathways activates P2 receptors in an autocrine or a paracrine manner,18 leading to activation of downstream purinergic signaling/ATP signaling pathways. Outcomes include activation of DNA repair, induction of antioxidants, apoptotic cell death, and so on.31-34 Though the latter phenomena are also observed in cells exposed to γ rays, involvement of ATP signaling in the radiation-induced effects was not clear.
Figure 2.

Pathways/channels of ATP release from cells. The pathways include a maxi-anion channel, P2X7 receptor/pore, a volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying chloride channel, a member of the ATP-binding cassette protein family, a gap junction hemichannel, and vesicular exocytosis. ATP indicates adenosine triphosphate; P2, purine 2.
ATP Release Through P2X7 Receptor From Cells Exposed to γ Rays
Therefore, we investigated whether radiation-induced release of ATP contributes to induction of the cellular antioxidant systems.35,36 First, dose-dependent release of ATP was investigated in B16 melanoma cells exposed to γ rays at doses ranging from 0 to 8 Gy. The ATP release was greatest at the dose of 0.5 Gy. Doses of more than 1.0 Gy resulted in lower ATP release, suggesting that oxidative damage to membrane proteins at higher doses of γ irradiation might cause impairment of ATP-release mechanisms. It is noteworthy that the dose of 0.5 Gy that gives the greatest ATP release is in accordance well with that we used in animal experiment so far.13,14,16,37 The concentration of ATP in culture medium of irradiated cells exposed to 0.5 Gy reached a peak at 5 minutes and then declined to the basal level within 30 minutes. We examined which pathways might be involved in the ATP release using various inhibitors of the maxi-anion channel, volume-sensitive outwardly rectifying chloride channel, P2X7 receptor channel, and so on. Glibenclamide, flufenamic acid (FFA), GdCl3, and arachidonic acid, which are inhibitors of anion channels or transporters, did not block radiation-induced ATP release, but the release was significantly inhibited by a highly selective antagonist of P2X7 receptor, A438079,38 suggesting involvement of P2X7 receptor in radiation-induced ATP release in B16 melanoma cells.38 This was confirmed by means of studies with P2X7 receptor-knockdown B16 melanoma cells. These results strongly support the involvement of P2X7 receptor in ionizing irradiation-induced ATP release in the melanoma cells used in our study. However, it should be noted that the contributions of ATP-releasing pathways may vary depending upon the type of cell examined.
Induction of TRX-1 by γ Ray Irradiation and Exogenously Added ATP
The role of thioredoxin-1 (TRX-1) in the induction of endogenous antioxidants by γ irradiation was examined in detail. The change of TRX-1 expression was evaluated in mouse macrophage-like RAW264.7 cells exposed to 0.5 Gy γ rays by means of immunoblotting. The TRX-1 expression increased time dependently from 1 hour after irradiation, peaking between 3 and 6 hours, and remained elevated until 24 hours after irradiation. The increase was almost completely blocked by pretreatment with the ectonucleotidase apyrase, suggesting that the γ ray irradiation-induced ATP release is involved in mediating the increase of TRX-1 expression. Therefore, we examined the effect of ATP itself on TRX-1 expression. Exogenously added ATP (100 μM) also increased TRX-1 expression time dependently, with a maximum at approximately 6 hours posttreatment, and the extent of the increase was dose dependent. Again, the increase was suppressed by pretreatment with apyrase. Taken together, these results indicate that extracellular ATP and activation of purinergic signaling are involved in the elevation of TRX-1 induced by γ irradiation.39
Next, selective purinergic-receptor antagonists were used to identify the specific pathway(s) through which extracellular ATP induces increased TRX-1-expression of RAW264.7 cells. The induction of TRX-1 and increase of cellular ATP by γ rays were both blocked by pretreatment with apyrase, P2X7 receptor-specific antagonist A438079 and P2Y6 receptor-specific antagonist MRS2578, suggesting the involvement of both P2Y6 and P2X7 receptors in TRX induction.
Overall, these results indicate that ATP released from cells exposed to γ rays mediates activation of cellular antioxidant systems as a defense against newly released intracellular ROS, including those generated by direct action of ionizing radiation on water molecules (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

ROS production in RAW264.7 cells via ATP signaling. ATP is released from the irradiated cells and subsequently may produce ROS by the activation of cell membrane nicotiamide adenine dinucleotide (NADPH) oxidase via purinergic signaling. Antioxidants, such as TRX-1, SOD, GSH and so on, are thought to be induced as an adaptive response newly released intracellular ROS, including those generated by direct action of ionizing radiation on water molecules. ATP indicates adenosine triphosphate; NADPH, TRX-1, thioredoxin 1; SOD, superoxide dismutase; GSH, glutathione; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Suppression of Solid Tumor Growth by Low-Dose Whole-Body γ Irradiation and Its Mechanism
It is now known that low-dose irradiation can have beneficial effects in living organisms, including increase of endogenous antioxidants and cell-mediated immunity, activation of DNA repair, and inhibitory effects on inflammation.17,40,41 In addition, low-dose ionizing radiation suppresses tumor growth and metastasis both clinically and in animal studies.12,42-51 In these articles, it is suggested that the antitumor effect is due to activation of the immune system, especially elevation of cytotoxic immune responses. We have examined this issue. First, we confirmed the inhibitory effect of low-dose whole-body γ irradiation on solid tumor growth in Ehrlich tumor-bearing mice. Male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice were exposed to a whole-body γ irradiation dose of 0.5 Gy. At 6 hours after the irradiation, Ehrlich tumor cells (2 × 105 cells) were subcutaneously implanted into the right leg. The mice were irradiated 3 times more (0.5 Gy/each) at 4-day intervals (total dose: 2.0 Gy). The tumor size was measured from day 9 through day 30. Gamma irradiation suppressed solid tumor growth at each time point.37
Next, we examined the mechanisms involved. The NK cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), and macrophages are essential immune cells for cell-mediated antitumor immunity. It has been reported that NK cells were responsible for the suppression of pulmonary metastasis by X-ray irradiation at 0.1 to 0.2 Gy.52,53 Also, we had previously shown that γ irradiation increased the amount of antioxidants such as GSH in tissues and cultured cells, leading to upregulation of cell-mediated antitumor immunity.16,17 These results suggest that elevated levels of antioxidants in immune cells of irradiated mice might be involved in the enhancement of cell-mediated antitumor immunity, and it seemed plausible that irradiation would activate a signaling cascade involved in the T-cell differentiation processes, such as interleukin 12 (IL-12) production by macrophages as antigen-presenting cells (APCs), thereby promoting a T helper 1 (Th1)-dominant state. Thus, Th1- and Th2-type cytokines were assayed to examine the Th1/Th2 balance. Tumor-bearing mice were irradiated with a single dose of 0.5 Gy γ rays, and splenocytes were isolated 48 hours later. Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and IL-4 (Th1 and Th2 cytokines, respectively) were assayed in irradiated and control mice. The splenocytes from the irradiated mice produced more IFN-γ than those from control mice, whereas little difference was found in IL-4 production between the 2 groups of mice; consequently, the IFN-γ/IL-4 ratio was significantly elevated in splenocytes of the irradiated group, suggesting that the balance of immunity was skewed toward Th1. To confirm this, we measured production of IL-12 in macrophages isolated from the abdomen of mice at 48 hours postirradiation with γ rays (0.5 Gy). Indeed, IL-12 production by these macrophages was increased. The irradiation also increased the cellular GSH level of the macrophages. The increase in the GSH level was sustained for a few days after irradiation. Thus, elevation of GSH in macrophages may also be involved in the shift of the immunity balance. It is noteworthy that NK and CTL activity were both reportedly enhanced with increase of intracellular GSH content.54 Further, in order to see whether the enhanced IL-12 production and elevated GSH level are due to a direct effect of irradiation on macrophages, we isolated macrophages from nonirradiated mice and irradiated them in vitro. No significant differences were seen between the irradiated and nonirradiated groups, suggesting that the enhanced production of IL-12 and the elevated GSH level of macrophages are induced indirectly, not by a direct effect of irradiation. As mentioned elsewhere, the intracellular GSH level in APC (including macrophages) has been found to play a critical role in the determination of immunity; a higher level of GSH favors Th155-57 by increasing IL-12 production. Though elevation of IFN-γ was confirmed in γ-irradiated mice, IFN-γ alone cannot stimulate macrophages to produce IL-12. However, production of IL-12 by macrophages is required for stimulation with lipopolysaccharide.58-60 The IFN-γ may potentiate macrophages to produce more IL-12 by increasing GSH.
It has been shown that IL-1β production is increased in immune cells exposed to radiation, leading to the production of IFN-γ. An increase of IL-1β expression in macrophages was induced by in vitro irradiation at 0.04 Gy, as well as in vivo irradiation; the initial release of IL-1β from irradiated macrophages activates T cells to produce cytokines such as IFN-γ, which in turn potentiate macrophages or APCs to produce IL-12.61,62 Thus, an APC’s T-cell activation loop may be initiated. On the other hand, tumor-bearing B-cell–deficient mice showed a marked increase in the tumor-free fraction of mice.63 The elimination of B cells from the splenocytes of tumor-bearing mice resulted in enhanced IFN-γ production, leading to increased IL-12 production. These effects were mediated by APC T-cell interaction via CD40.64 Thus, B cells favor a Th2-dominant state by interfering with the interaction between APCs and antitumor T cells. They also have potential to skew immunity toward Th2 by inducing IL-4 and IL-10 or by presenting antigens.65-67 These facts suggest that a decrease in B-cell population may also facilitate Th1 polarization. It is well established that the B-cell lineage is especially radiosensitive among lymphocytes and hemopoietic cells,68 and whole-body irradiation selectively decreases the percentage of B-cell population with a concomitant increase in the helper T-cell population in blood, as well as in the spleen.15,69 Thus, selective killing of B cells by radiation throughout the body may provide conditions that favor Th1 polarization. These results indicate that low-dose radiation shifts the immunity balance toward Th1, resulting in enhancement of cell-mediated antitumor activity.
Suppression of Tumor Metastasis by Low-Dose Whole-Body γ Irradiation: Role of Matrix Metalloprotease
As already mentioned, low-dose whole-body γ irradiation (0.5 Gy × 4 times) suppressed solid tumor growth due at least in part to the elevation of intracellular antioxidants followed by activation of cell-mediated immunity.17 We next examined the effect of γ irradiation on tumor metastasis in a mouse model of pulmonary metastasis. C57BL/6 mice were first γ irradiated at the dose of 0.5 Gy and then intravenously injected with B16F10 melanoma cells (2.0 × 105 cells) via the tail vein at 6 hours after irradiation. The mice then received 3 more irradiations (0.5 Gy/each) at 4-day intervals (total dose: 2.0 Gy). After 14 days, the lungs were excised and melanoma colonies were counted. The repeated γ irradiation significantly inhibited colony formation in the lung tissues, suppressing tumor metastasis. A previous report had also shown that 0.15 to 0.2 Gy X-ray single-dose irradiation inhibited tumor metastasis.70 Though many factors may contribute to this effect, we focused on changes in matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteases (TIMPs), which are both important factors in tumor metastasis, in order to clarify the mechanism of the inhibitory effect. Several reports show that high levels of MMP-2, as well as other MMPs, exacerbate tumor metastasis both directly and indirectly via degradation of the extracellular matrix and activation of various growth factors.71-73 On the other hand, tumor metastasis was inhibited in MMP-2 knockout (KO) mice.74 There is also much evidence that redox modulation of the progression of various diseases, such as tumors, cardiac ischemic injuries, and so on, involves down/upregulation of a subset of MMPs.75-83
First, we investigated the changes of MMP-2 in lungs of metastasis model mice at 14 days after the first γ irradiation. Protein expression and activity of MMP-2 were both significantly reduced. A similar reduction was seen in lungs of normal mice 24 hours after a single γ irradiation. These results suggest that radiation-induced decrease of MMP-2 in lung tissues may contribute to the suppression of lung tumor metastasis.
On the other hand, TIMP-2 suppresses tumor metastasis by inhibiting the gelatinolytic activity of MMP-2 and blocking MMP-2–mediated activation of various other factors. Alteration of TIMP-2 expression in the host mice also affects tumor metastasis. For example, the adenovirus-mediated overexpression of TIMP-2 prior to or after tumor challenge results in a significant reduction of tumor metastasis.84 The TIMP-2 alone also inhibited cell proliferation or cell migration.85-87 Thus, we examined changes of expression and activity of TIMP-2 in lungs of the metastasis model mice at 14 days after the first γ irradiation. We found that TIMP was increased at the protein, mRNA, and activity levels. Overall, elevation of the expression and activity of TIMP-2 in lung tissues appears to inhibit tumor metastasis. Moreover, the alteration of the MMP-2/TIMP-2 balance induced by low-dose whole-body γ irradiation might result in an increase of free TIMP-2, which could act directly on tumor cells in the lung. Besides induction of cell-mediated immunity by low-dose γ rays, we thus identified a suppressive and/or an enhancing effect of radiation on MMP-2 and/or TIMP-2, respectively.88 It is also clear that γ irradiation at high doses (more than 8 Gy) activates MMPs and promotes tumor metastasis.89 Thus, low-dose whole-body γ irradiation appears to inhibit solid tumor growth and tumor metastasis via its effects on cell-mediated immunity and MMPs (Figure 4).
Figure 4.

Activation of cell-mediated antitumor immunity and suppression of matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) under reductive conditions. Enhancement of intracellular reduced condition induced by low-dose γ irradiation could regulate Th1/Th2 and MMP-2/TIMP-2 balance, resulting in suppression of tumor growth and metastasis. Th indicates T helper; TIMP-2, tissue inhibitors of metalloprotease 2.
Role of ATP Signaling in Radioresistance
A small preceding/priming/adapting/conditioning dose of ionizing radiation decreases the biological effectiveness of a subsequent large challenging dose in the living body. This phenomenon of radioadaptive response is called induction of radioresistance.90-94 It is generally thought that various factors, including high contents of antioxidants, DNA damage-repairing activities, cell cycle control gene expression, signal transmission, reduction of apoptotic death, and so on are involved in the response.95-100 Living organisms have an elaborate antioxidant defense system, including SOD, CAT, GPX, and reduced GSH, to protect them against ROS. There is little doubt that these antioxidants also participate in the radioresistance induced by a small dose of ionizing radiation, as described above.
However, ATP signaling also plays a role in radioresistance by promoting DNA damage repair. In the case of double-strand breaks, ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is activated at sites of damage, and phosphorylated histone variant H2AX (γH2AX) is phosphorylated. Then, repair proteins such as tumor suppressor p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) are accumulated at the same sites.101 However, the mechanisms are not yet fully understood. As regard the role of ATP, focus formation of ATM-γH2AX, which is considered an index of DNA repair processes, is observed within 3 hours in human lung cancer A154 cells irradiated with γ rays at a dose of 2 Gy. Formation of these foci is significantly inhibited by pretreatment with the ectonucleotidase apyrase, whereas conversely posttreatment with ATP or UTP promotes their formation, suggesting an important role of these extracellular nucleotides in focus induction, and thus DNA damage repair.101 The subtypes of P2 receptors participating in repair signaling were examined using various kinds of P2 receptor antagonists, and it was found that antagonists of P2Y6 and P2Y12 markedly blocked formation of the foci. Involvement of these P2Y receptors in the repair mechanisms was further confirmed using cells in which each receptor had been knocked down. Finally, it was concluded that 3 P2 receptors, P2X7, P2Y6, and P2Y12, participate in DNA repair signaling in response to γ irradiation.102,103 That is, γ irradiation causes release of ATP into extracellular space via P2X7, and the released ATP activates P2Y6 and/or P2Y12, resulting in formation of foci consisting of γH2AX, 53BP1, and ATM, which mediate repair of DNA damage (Figure 5).
Figure 5.

Involvement of ATP signaling in DNA damage repair. Irradiation with γ rays releases ATP via P2X7 receptor, and its metabolites activate P2Y6 and P2Y12 receptors. The activation induces the activation of ATM at sites of DNA damage, followed by induction of γH2AX and activation of 53BP1 in the irradiated cells. ATM indicates ataxia telangiectasia mutated; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; P2, purine 2.
Involvement of Adenosine A2B Receptor in Differentiation of Regulatory T Cells
We have reported that repeated 0.5 Gy γ irradiation upregulates the percentage of regulatory T (Treg) cells in various autoimmune disease models.104-107 In this section, we focus on the role of ATP in the induction of Treg in irradiated mice. Upon interaction with a self- or a cross-reactive antigen, naive CD4+ T helper cells activate, expand, and differentiate into various T-cell subsets with different properties, depending on cytokines. T helper cells include type 1 Th (Th1) cells and type 2 Th (Th2) cells,108 Th17,109,110 Th9 cells,111,112 and regulatory subsets such as induced Treg cells and type 1 regulatory T cells.113-115
Cytoplasmic ATP is released to the extracellular space in response to various stresses, as described above. The released ATP is immediately degraded to adenosine by extracellular ectonucleotidases, including CD39 and CD73, and activates P1 receptors.116-118 Extracellular adenosine binds to multiple adenosine receptors, that is adenosine A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 receptors, which belongs to a family of G protein-coupled receptors. Stimulation of A2A receptor on T cells by adenosine inhibits T-cell receptor (TCR)-mediated T-cell proliferation and upregulation of IL-2 receptor, as well as most of the effector functions of cytotoxic T cells.119,120 Moreover, recent studies indicate that extracellular adenosine is involved in immunosuppressive functions of Treg; immunosuppressive adenosine is produced via increased expression of CD39 and CD73, which degrade ATP to adenosine, on the Treg surface.121,122 With this background, we hypothesized that ATP would be released from splenocytes in response to low-dose γ ray irradiation, and adenosine derived from this ATP would be involved in differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Treg. To test this hypothesis, we examined the involvement of P1 receptors in upregulation of Treg by low-dose γ irradiation. Among the G protein-coupled cell surface receptors A1, A2A, A2B, and A3, the A1 and A2A receptors have greater affinity for adenosine than A2B and A3.117,118 However, the A2B receptor promotes inflammatory responses of mast cells, epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells, and fibroblasts, contributing to the pathophysiology of asthma and colitis.123 Moreover, some pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, are induced via activation of A2B receptor in dendritic cells.124,125 On the other hand, it has been reported that A2B receptor protects against inflammation and excessive vascular adhesion; the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IL-6, were increased in A2B receptor-KO mice, whereas anti-inflammatory IL-10 was decreased. These findings imply that ATP and its metabolite, adenosine, are involved in differentiation of Treg and Th17.126 Thus, we focused on the involvement of adenosine and P1 receptors in the differentiation of Treg. Intriguingly, we found that inhibition of adenosine A2B receptor suppressed the differentiation of Treg without suppressing T-cell activation.127 These results suggested that stimulation of A2B receptor might promote Treg differentiation. We also showed that low-dose γ irradiation attenuates autoimmune manifestations in Murfy and Roths Laboratories (MRL)-lpr/lpr mice and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mice via suppression of cytokines and autoantibodies, and upregulation of Treg, but not by directly damaging lymphocytes. Moreover, γ irradiation-induced ATP release would contribute to the differentiation of Treg from naive CD4+ T cells via stimulation of adenosine A2B receptor by the ATP metabolite, adenosine. The putative role of extracellular adenosine, generated from ATP released by γ irradiation, in promoting the differentiation of Treg from naive CD4+ T cells via adenosine A2B receptor is illustrated schematically in Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Regulatory T (Treg) cell differentiation via ATP signaling. ATP would be released in response to low-dose γ ray irradiation from splenocytes and degraded adenosine from ATP might be involved in differentiation into Treg from naïve CD4+ T cells via stimulation of adenosine A2B receptor. ATP indicates adenosine triphosphate.
Conclusions
In this review, we have introduced and reviewed the results of extensive studies by our group and others, demonstrating that ATP signaling plays an important role in the biological effects of radiation. More recently, detailed studies have also shown that transient receptor potential melastatin, a nonselective cation channel, is activated dependently on P2X7 receptor,128 resulting in release of nucleotides such as ATP through connexin43 hemichannel.35 Subsequently, P2Y6/P2Y12 receptor is activated, leading to a range of low-dose irradiation-induced molecular events, such as activation of epidermal growth factor-extracelluar signal-regulated kinase (EGFR-ERK)1/2,129,130 repair of damaged DNA,103 ROS production, induction of endogenous antioxidants,39 and so on (Figure 7). Such a detailed understanding of the role of ATP signaling in adaptive responses, such as radiation resistance and DNA damage repair, is important, both because of the apparent beneficial effects of low-dose radiation in the living body and also because of the role of resistance in radio/chemotherapy of cancer.131
Figure 7.

ATP signaling and biological effects of low-dose ionizing radiation. Irradiation with low-dose γ rays releases nucleotides such as ATP through connexin 43 hemichannel,35,36 followed by activation of P2Y6/P2Y12 receptor, leading to a range of low-dose irradiation-induced molecular events. Such an event includes activation of EGFR-ERK1/2,129,130 DNA damage repair,103 production of ROS, induction of antioxidants,39 and so on. ATP indicates adenosine triphosphate; P2, purine 2; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
It has also been suggested that ATP signaling is involved in the so-called bystander effect, which is currently attracting much interest in the field of radiobiology. Both ATP and connexin43 were found to participate in the bystander effect in in vivo mouse model experiments.10,132 In this connection, we have reported ripple-like release of ATP from a single cell irradiated with an X-ray microbeam. Clearly, the ramifications of ATP signaling remain to be fully explored.
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1. Shi MM, Kugelman A, Iwamoto T, Tian L, Forman HJ. Quinone-induced oxidative stress elevates glutathione and induces gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase activity in rat lung epithelial L2 cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(42):26512–26517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hoshi Y, Tanooka H, Miyazaki K, Wakasugi H. Induction of thioredoxin in human lymphocytes with low-dose ionizing radiation. Bichim Biophys Acta. 1997;1359(1):65–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ochi T. Arsenic compound-induced increases in glutathione levels in cultured Chinese hamster V79 cells and mechanism associated with changes in gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase activity, cystine uptake and utilization of cysteine. Arch Toxicol. 1997;71(12):730–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Applegate LA, Scaletta C, Panizzon R, Frenk E. Evidence that ferritin is UV inducible in human skin: part of a putative defense mechanism. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(1):159–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Yin X, Wu H, Chen Y, Kang YJ. Induction of antioxidants by Adriamycin in mouse heart. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;56(1):87–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Haendeler J, Tischler V, Hoffmann J, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Low doses of reactive oxygen species protect endothelial cells from apoptosis by increasing thioredoxin-1 expression. FEBS Lett. 2004;577(3):427–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Kojima S, Negishi Y, Tsukimoto M, Takenouchi T, Kitani H, Takeda K. Pruinergic signaling via P2X7 receptor mediates IL-β production in Kuffer cells exposed to silica nanoparticle. Toxicology. 2006;321:13–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lei XG, Zhu JH, Cheng WH, et al. Paradoxical roles of antioxidant enzyme: basic mechanisms and health implications. Physiol Rev. 2016;96(1):307–364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Avti PK, Pathak CM, Kumar S, et al. Low dose gamma-irradiation differentially modulates antioxidant defense in liver and lungs of Balb/c mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 2005;181(12):901–910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Temme J, Bauer G. Low-dose gamma irradiation enhances superoxide anion production by nonirradiated cells through TGF-β1-dependent bystander signaling. Radiat Res. 2013;179(4):422–432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hong MJ, Kim JB, Yoon YH, et al. The effect of chronic irradiation on oxidative stress response and the expression of anthocyanin biosynthesis-related genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Int J Radiat Biol. 2014;90(12):1218–1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Kim RK, Kim MJ, Seong KM, et al. Beneficial effect of low dose radiation in response to the oncogenic KRAS induced cellular transformation. Sci Rep. 2010;5:15809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kojima S, Matsuki O, Kinoshita I, et al. Dose small-dose γ-ray induce endogenous antioxidant potencial in vivo? Biol Pharm Bull. 1997;20(6):601–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Kojima S, Matsuki O, Nomura T, et al. Induction of mRNAs for glutathione synthesis-related proteins in mouse liver by low doses of γ-rays. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1381(3):312–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kojima S. Induction of glutathione and activation of immune functions by low-dose, whole body irradiation with γ-rays [in Japanese]. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2006;126(10):849–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kojima S, Matsumori S, Ishida H, Yamamoto A. Possible role of elevation of glutathione in the acquisition of enhanced proliferation of mouse splenocytes exposed to small-does γ-rays. Int J Rad Biol. 2000;76(12):1641–1647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kojima S, Ishida H, Takahashi M, Yamaoka K. Elevation of glutathione induced by low-dose γ rays and its involvement in increased natural killer activity. Radiat Res. 2002;157(3):275–280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Corriden R, Insel PA. Basal release of ATP: an autocrine-paracrine mechanism for cell regulation. Sci Signal. 2010;3(104):re1 doi:10.1126/ scisignal.3104re1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lazarowski ER, Sesma JI, Seminario-Vidal L, Kreda SM. Molecular mechanism of purine and pyrimidine nucleotide release. Adv Pharmacol. 2011;61:221–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Burnstock G. Purinergic signaling: from discovery to current developments. Exp Physiol. 2014;99(1):16–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Burnstock G. Purinergic signaling. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(suppl 1):S172–S81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yegutkin GG. Nucleotide- and nucleoside-converting ectoenzymes: important modulators of purinergic signalling cascade. Biochi Biophys Acta. 2008;1783(5):673–694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Sprague RS, Ellsworth ML, Stephenson AH, Kleinhenz ME, Lonigro AJ. Deformation-induced ATP release from red blood cells requires CFTR activity. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(5 pt 2): H1726–H1732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Taylor AL, Kudlow BA, Marrs KL, Gruenert DC, Guggino WB, Schwiebert EM. Bioluminescence detection of ATP release mechanisms in epithelia. Am J Physiol. 1998;275(5 pt 1): C1391–C1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Sabirov RZ, Dutta AK, Okada Y. Volume-dependent ATP-conductive large conductance anion channel as a pathway for swelling-induced ATP release. J Gen Physiol. 2001;118(3):251–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Stout CE, Costantin J, Naus CC, Charles AC. Intercellular calcium signaling in astrocytes via ATP release through connexin hemichannels. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(12):10482–10488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hisadome K, Koyama T, Kimura C, et al. Volume-regulated anion channels serve as an auto/paracrine nucleotide release pathway in aortic endothelial cells. J Gen Physiol. 2002;119(6):511–520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Pellegatti P, Falzoni S, Pinton P, et al. A novel recombinant plasma membrane-targeted luciferase reveals a new pathway for ATP secretion. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16(8):3659–3665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Pankratov Y, Lalo U, Verkhratsky A, North RA. Vesicular release of ATP at central synapses. Pflugers Arch. 2006;452(5):589–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Fitz JG. Regulation of cellular ATP release. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2007;118:199–208. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hillman KA, Harada H, Chan CM, et al. Chicken DT40 cells stably transfected with the rat P2X7 receptor ion channel: a system suitable for the study of purine receptor-mediated cell death. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66(3):415–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pines A, Perrone L, Bivi N, et al. Activation of APE1/Ref-1 is dependent on reactive oxygen species generated after purinergic receptor stimulation by ATP. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(14):4379–4394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Shinozaki Y, Koizumi S, Ishida S, Sawada J, Ohno Y, Inoue K. Cytoprotection against oxidative stress-induced damage of astrocytes by extracellular ATP via P2Y1 receptors. Glia. 2005;49(2):288–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Tsukimoto M, Harada H, Ikari A, Takagi K. Involvement of chloride in apoptotic cell death induced by activation of ATP-sensitive P2X7 purinoceptor. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(4):2653–2658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Ohshima Y, Tsukimoto M, Takenouchi T, et al. Gamma-irradiation induces P2X7 receptor-dependent ATP release from B16 melanoma cells. Biochem Biophys Acta. 2010;1800(1):40–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ohshima Y, Tsukimoto M, Harada H, Kojima S. Involvement of connexin43 hemi-channel in ATP release after γ-irradiation. J Radiat Res. 2012;53(4):551–557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kojima S, Nakayama K, Ishida H. Low dose gamma-rays activate immune functions via induction of glutathione and delay tumor growth. J Radiat Res. 2004;45(1):33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Nelson DW, Gregg RJ, Kort ME, et al. Structure-activity relationship studies on a series of novel, substituted 1-benzyl-5-phenyltetrazole P2X7 antagonists. J Med Chem. 2006;49(12):3659–3666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ohshima Y, Kitami A, Kawano M, Tsukimoto M, Kojima S. Induction of extracellular ATP mediates increase of intracellular thioredoxin in RWA264.7 cells exposed to low-dose-γ-rays. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(6):1240–1248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Arenas M, Gil F, Gironella M, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of low-dose radiotherapy in an experimental model of systemic inflammation in mice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(2):560–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Otsuka K, Koana T, Tauchi H, Sakai K. Activation of antioxidative enzymes induced by low-dose-rate whole-body gamma irradiation: adaptive response in terms of initial DNA damage. Radiat Res. 2006;166(3):474–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Sakamoto K, Myogin M, Hosoi Y, et al. Fundamental and clinical studies on cancer control with total or upper half body irradiation. J Jpn Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 1997;9(3):161–175. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cuttler JM, Pollycove M. Can cancer be treated with low doses of radiation? J Am Phy Surg. 2003;8(4):108–111. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Liu SZ. Nonlinear dose–response relationship in the immune system following exposure to ionizing radiation: mechanisms and implications. Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. 2003;1(1):71–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Safwat A, Bayoumy Y, El-Sharkawy N, Shaaban K, Mansour O, Kamel A. The potential palliative role and possible immune modulatory effects of low-dose total body irradiation in relapsed or chemo-resistant non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Radiother Oncol, 2003;69(1):33–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Luckey TD. Documented optimum and threshold for ionizing radiation. Int J Nuclear Law. 2007;1:378–409. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Pollycove M. Radiobiological basis of low-dose irradiation in prevention and therapy of cancer. Dose Response. 2006;5(1):26–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Yu HS, Liu ZM, Yu XY, Song AQ, Liu N, Wang H. Low-dose radiation induces antitumor effects and erythrocyte system hormesis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(7):4121–4126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Scott BR, Bruce VR, Gott KM, Wilder J, March T. Small γ-ray doses prevent rather than increase lung tumors in mice. Dose-Response. 2012;10(4):527–540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Scott BR. Radiation-hormesis phenotypes, the related mechanisms and implications for disease prevention and therapy. J Cell Commun Signal. 2014;8(4):341–352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Yang G, Li W, Jiang H, et al. Low-dose radiation may be a novel approach to enhance the effectiveness of cancer therapeutics. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(10):2157–2168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Cheda A, Wrembel-Wargocka J, Lisiak E, Nowosielska EM, Marciniak M, Janiak MK. Single low doses of X-rays inhibit the development of experimental tumor metastases and trigger the activities of NK cells in mice. Radiat Res. 2004;161(2):335–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Nowosielska EM, Cheda A, Wrembel-Wargocka J, Janiak MK. Immunological mechanism of the low-dose radiation-induced suppression of cancer metastasis in mouse model. Dose Response. 2010;8(2):209–226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Hayase H, Ohshima Y, Takahashi M, Kojima S. The enhancement of Th1 immunity and the suppression of tumour growth by low-dose γ-radiation. Int J Low Radiat. 2008;5(4):275–289. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Peterson JD, Herzenberg LA, Vasquez K, Waltenbaugh C. Glutathione levels in antigen-presenting cells modulate Th1 versus Th2 response patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(6):3071–3076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Murata Y, Shimamura T, Hamuro J. The polarization of T(h)1/T(h)2 balance is dependent on the intracellular thiol redox status of macrophages due to the distinctive cytokine production. Int Immunol. 2002;14(2):201–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Utsugi M, Dobashi K, Ishizuka T, et al. c-Jun N-terminal kinase negatively regulates lipopolysaccharide-induced IL-12 production in human macrophages: role of mitogen-activated protein kinase in glutathione redox regulation of IL-12 production. J Immunol. 2003;171(2):628–635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Ma X, Chow JM, Gri G, et al. The interleukin 12 p40 gene promoter is primed by interferon γ in monocytic cells. J Exp Med. 1996;183(1):147–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Dobashi K, Aihara M, Araki T, et al. Regulation of LPS induced IL-12 production by IFN-γ and IL-4 through intracellular glutathione status in human alveolar macrophages. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;124(2):290–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Grohmann U, Belladonna ML, Vacca C, et al. Positive regulatory role of IL-12 in macrophages and modulation by IFN-γ . J Immunol. 2001;167(1):221–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ibuki Y, Goto R. Contribution of inflammatory cytokine release to activation of resident peritoneal macrophages after in vivo low-dose γ-irradiation. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1993;40(3):253–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Hosoi Y, Miyachi H, Matsumoto Y, et al. Induction of interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 mRNA by low doses of ionizing radiation in macrophages. Int J Cancer. 2001;96(5):270–276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Qin Z, Richter G, Schuler T, Ibe S, Cao X, Blankenstein T. B cells inhibit induction of T cell-dependent tumour immunity. Nat Med. 1998;4(5):627–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Wijesuriya R, Maruo S, Zou JP, et al. B-cell mediated down-regulation of IFN-γ and IL-12 production induced during anti-tumour immune responses in the tumor-baring state. Int Immunol. 1998;10(8):1057–1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Moulin V, Andris F, Thielemans K, Maliszewski C, Urbain J, Moser M. Lymphocytes regulates dendritic cell (CD) function in vivo: increased inteleukin-12 production by DCs from B cell-deficient mice results in T helper cell type 1 deviation. J Exp Med. 2000;192(4):475–482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. O’Garra A, Stapleton G, Dhar V, et al. Production of cytokines by mouse B cells: B lymphomas and normal B cells produce interleukin 10. Int Immunol. 1990;2(9):821–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Denis O, Latinne D, Nisol F, Bazin H. Resting B cells can act as antigen presenting cells in vivo and induce antibody response. Int Immunol. 1993;5(1):71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Goodhead DL. Mechanisms for the biological effectiveness of high-LET radiations. J Radiat Res (Tokyo). 1999;(suppl 40):1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Pecaut MJ, Nelson GA, Gridley DS. Dose and dose rate effects of whole-body γ-irradiation: lymphocytes and lymphoid organs, In Vivo. 2001;15(3):195–208. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Hosoi Y, Sakamoto K. Suppressive effect of low dose total body irradiation on lung metastasis: dose dependency and effective period. Radiother Oncol. 1993;26(2):177–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Johansson N, Ahonen M, Kähäri VM. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumour invasion. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2000;57(1):5–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Chang C, Werb Z. The many faces of metalloproteases: cell growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2001;11(11): S37–S43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zheng H, Takahashi H, Murai Y, et al. Expressions of MMP-2, MMP-9 and VEGF are closely linked to growth, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis of gastric carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2006;26(5A):3579–3583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Itoh T, Tanioka M, Yoshida H, Yoshioka T, Nishimoto H, Itohara S. Reduced angiogenesis and tumor progression in gelatinase A-deficient mice. Cancer Res. 1998;58(5):1048–1051. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Gasche Y, Copin JC, Sugawara T, Fujimura M, Chan PH. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition prevents oxidative stress-associated blood–brain barrier disruption after transient focal cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001;21(12):1393–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Brenneisen P, Sies H, Scharffetter-Kochanek K. Ultraviolet-B irradiation and matrix metalloproteinase’s. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;973:31–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Giles NM, Watts AB, Giles GI, Fry FH, Littlechild JA, Jacob C. Metal and redox modulation review of cysteine protein function. Chem Biol. 2003;10(8):677–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Nelson K, Melendez JA. Mitochondrial redox control of matrix metalloproteinases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37(6):768–784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Schulz R. Intracellular targets of matrix metalloproteinase-2 in cardiac disease: rationale and therapeutic approaches. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2007;47:211–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Kar S, Subbaram S, Carricoc PM, Melendez JA. Redox-control of matrix metalloproteinase-1: a critical link between free radicals, matrix remodeling and degenerative disease. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2010;174(3):299–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Zhang Q, Gould LJ. Hyperbaric oxygen reduces matrix metalloproteinases in ischemic wounds through a redox-dependent mechanism. J Invest Dermatol. 2013;134(1):237–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Hsieh HL, Yang CM. Role of redox signaling in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases. BioMed Res Inter. 2013;2013:1–18. ID 484613 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Chiao YA, Rabinovitch PS. The aging heart. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015;5(9):a025148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Brand K, Baker AH, Perez-Cantó A, et al. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases by adenoviral transfer of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 into the liver tissue. Cancer Res. 2000;60(20):5723–5730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hajitou A, Sounni NE, Devy L, et al. Down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2: effect on in vivo mammary tumor growth and angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2001;61(8):3450–3457. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Hoegy SE, Oh HR, Corcoran ML, Stetler-Stevenson WG. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) suppresses TKR-growth factor signaling independent of metalloproteinase inhibition. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(5):3203–3214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Oh J, Seo DW, Diaz T, et al. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 2 inhibits endothelial cell migration through increased expression of RECK. Cancer Res. 2004;64(24):9062–9069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Ohshima Y, Tsukimoto M, Kojima S. The novel mechanism of metastasis inhibition by low-dose whole-body irradiation with gamma-rays. Int J Low Radiat. 2008;5(2):156–167. [Google Scholar]
- 89. Kaliski A, Maggiorella L, Cengel KA, et al. Angiogenesis and tumour growth inhibition by a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor targeting radiation-induced invasion. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005;4(11):1717–1728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Olivieri G, Bodycote J, Wollf S. Adaptive response of human lymphocytes to low concentrations of radioactive thymidine. Science. 1984;223(4636):594–597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Ikushima T, Aritomi H, Morishita J. Radioadaptive response: efficient repair of radiation-induced DNA damage in adapted cells. Mutat Res. 1996;358(2):193–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Kleczkowska H, Althaus F. The role of poly (ADPribosyl) ation in the adaptive response. Mutat Res. 1996;358(2):215–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Yonezawa M, Misonoh J, Hosokawa Y. Two types of X-ray induced radio-resistance in mice: presence of 4 dose ranges with distinct biological effects. Mutat Res. 1996;358(2):237–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Blankenbecler R. Low-dose pretreatment for radiation therapy. Dose Response 2010;8(4):534–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Powell SN, McMillan TJ. The repair fidelity of restriction enzyme-induced double strand breaks in plasmid DNA correlates with radioresistance in human tumor cell lines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;29(5):1035–1040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Borek C. Dietary antioxidants and human cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2002;3(4):333–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Milas L, Hittelman WN. Cancer stem cells and tumor response to therapy: current problems and future prospects. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2009;19(2):96–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Pajonk F, Vlashia E, McBridea WH. Radiation resistance of cancer stem cells: the 4 R’s of radiobiology revisited. Stem Cells. 2010;28(4):639–648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Zhou C, Ye W, Shao Q, Zhang M, Liang J. Nrf2 is a potential therapeutic target in radioresistance in human cancer. Crit Rev Hamatol. 2013;88(3):706–711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Chang L, Graham P, Hao J, et al. Proteomics discovery of radioresistant cancer biomarkers for radiotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2015;369(2):289–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Bekker-Jensen S, Mailand N. Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amst). 2010;9(12):1219–1228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Ide S, Nishimaki N, Tsukimoto M, Kojima S. Purine receptor P2Y6 mediates cellular response to γ-ray induced DNA damages. J Toxicol Sci. 2014;39(1):15–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Nishimaki N, Tsukimoto M, Kitami A, Kojima S. Autocrine regulation of γ-irradiation-induced DNA damage response via extracellular nucleotides-mediated activation of P2Y6 and P2Y12 receptors. DNA Repair. 2012;11(8):657–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Tago F, Tsukimoto M, Nakatsukasa H, Kojima S. Repeated 0.5-Gy gamma irradiation attenuates autoimmune disease in MRL-lpr/lpr mice with suppression of CD3+CD4−CD8−B220+ T-cell proliferation and with up-regulation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Radiat Res. 2008;169(1):59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Tsukimoto M, Nakatsukasa K, Sugawara K, Yamashita K, Kojima S. Repeated 0.5 Gy γ-irradiation attenuates experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with up-regulation of regulatory T cells and suppression of IL-17 production by Th17 cells. Radiat Res. 2008;170(4):429–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Nakatsukasa H, Tsukimoto M, Ohshima Y, Tago F, Masada A, Kojima S. Suppressing effect of low-dose gamma-ray irradiation on collagen-induced arthritis. J Radiat Res. 2010;49(4):381–389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Nakatsukasa H, Tsukimoto M, Tokunaga A, Kojima S. Repeated gamma-ray irradiation attenuates collagen-induced arthritis via up-regulation of regulatory T cells, but not by damaging lymphocytes directly. Radiat Res. 2010;174(3):313–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Mosmann TR, Cherwinski H, Bond MW, Giedlin MA, Coffman RL. Two types of murine helper T cell clone. I. Definition according to profiles of lymphokine activities and secreted proteins. J Immunol. 1986;136(7):2348–2357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Bettelli E, Carrier Y, Gao W, et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441(7090):235–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Veldhoen M, Hocking RJ, Atkins CJ, Locksley RM, Stockinger B. TGF-β in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17- producing T cells. Immunity. 2006;24(2):179–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Dardalhon V, Awasthi A, Kwon H, et al. IL-4 inhibits TGF-β-induced Foxp3+ T cells and, together with TGF-β, generates IL-9+IL-10+Foxp3− effector T cells. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(12):1347–1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Veldhoen M, Uyttenhove C, van Snick J, et al. Transforming growth factor-β “reprograms” the differentiation of T helper 2 cells and promotes an interleukin 9-producing subset. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(12):1341–1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, Toda M. Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J Immunol. 1995;155(3):1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003;299(5609):1057–1106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Battaglia M, Gregori S, Bacchetta R, Roncarolo MG. Tr1 cells: from discovery to their clinical application. Semin Immunol. 2006;18(2):120–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Kumar V, Sharma A. Adenosine: an endogenous modulator of innate immune system with therapeutic potential. Eur J Pharmacol. 2009;616(1-3):7–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Nakajima A, Hirose S, Yagita H, Okumura K. Roles of IL-4 and IL-12 in the development of lupus in NZB/W F1 mice. J Immunol. 1997;158(3):1466–1472. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Haskó G, Linden J, Cronstein B, Pacher P. Adenosine receptors: therapeutic aspects for inflammatory and immune diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(9):759–770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Huang S, Apasov S, Koshiba M, Sitkovsky M. Role of A2a extracellular adenosine receptor-mediated signaling in adenosine-mediated inhibition of T-cell activation and expansion. Blood. 1997;90(4):1600–1610. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Koshiba M, Kojima H, Huang S, Apasov S, Sitkovsky MV. Memory of extracellular adenosine A2A purinergic receptor-mediated signaling in murine T cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(41):25881–25889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Deaglio S, Dwyer KM, Gao W, et al. Adenosine generation catalyzed by CD39 and CD73 expressed on regulatory T cells mediates immune suppression. J Exp Med. 2007;204(6):1257–6125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Mandapathil M, Hilldorfer B, Szczepanski MJ, et al. Generation and accumulation of immunosuppressive adenosine by human CD4+CD25 high-Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(6):7176–7186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Haskó G, Csóka B, Németh ZH, Vizi ES, Pacher P. A (2B) adenosine receptors in immunity and inflammation. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(6):263–270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Feoktistov I, Goldstein AE, Ryzhov S, et al. Differential expression of adenosine receptors in human endothelial cells: role of A2B receptors in angiogenic factor regulation. Circ Res. 2002;90(5):531–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Zhong H, Belardinelli L, Maa T, Feoktistov I, Biaggioni I, Zeng D. A(2B) adenosine receptors increase cytokine release by bronchial smooth muscle cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30(1):118–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Yang D, Zhang Y, Nguyen HG, et al. The A2B adenosine receptor protects against inflammation and excessive vascular adhesion. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(7):1913–1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Nakatsuaksa H, Tsukimoto M, Harada H, Kojima S. Adenosine A2B receptor anatagonist suppresses differentiation to regulatory T cells without suppressing activation of T cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;409(1):114–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Masumoto K, Tsukimoto M, Kojima S. Role of TRPM2 and TRPV1 cation channels in cellular response to radiation-induced DNA damage. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3382–3390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Tsukimoto M, Homma T, Ohshima Y, Kojima S. Involvement of purinergic signaling in cellular response to gamma-irradiation. Radiat Res. 2010;173(3):298–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Tamaishi N, Tsukimoto M, Kitami A, Kojima S. P2Y6 receptors and ADAM17 mediate low-dose gamma-ray irradiation-induced focus formation (activation) of EGF receptor. Radiat Res. 2011;175(2):193–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Sokolov M, Neumann N. Global gene expression alterations as a crucial constituent of human cell response to low doses of ionizing radiation exposure. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(1). pii: E55 doi:10.3390/ijms 17010055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Mancuso M, Pasquali E, Leonardi S, et al. Role of connexin43 and ATP in long-range bystander radiation damage and oncogenesis in vivo. Oncogene. 2011;30(45):4601–4608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
