Abstract
Taking into account recently obtained data indicating the participation of circulating extracellular DNA (exDNA) in tumorigenesis, enzymes with deoxyribonucleic activity have again been considered as potential antitumour and antimetastatic drugs. Previously, using murine Lewis lung carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma A1 tumour models, we have shown the antimetastatic activity of bovine DNase I, which correlates with an increase of DNase activity and a decrease of exDNA concentration in the blood serum of tumour-bearing mice. In this work, using next-generation sequencing on the ABS SOLiD™ 5.500 platform, we performed a search for molecular targets of DNase I by comparing the exDNA profiles of healthy animals, untreated animals with Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and those with LLC treated with DNase I. We found that upon DNase I treatment of LLC-bearing mice, together with inhibition of metastasis, a number of strong alterations in the patterns of exDNA were observed. The major differences in exDNA profiles between groups were: i) the level of GC-poor sequences increased during tumour development was reduced to that of healthy mice; ii) levels of sequences corresponding to tumour-associated genes Hmga2, Myc and Jun were reduced in the DNase I-treated group in comparison with non-treated mice; iii) 224 types of tandem repeat over-presented in untreated LLC-bearing mice were significantly reduced after DNase I treatment. The most important result obtained in the work is that DNase I decreased the level of B-subfamily repeats having homology to human ALU repeats, known as markers of carcinogenesis, to the level of healthy animals. Thus, the obtained data lead us to suppose that circulating exDNA plays a role in tumour dissemination, and alteration of multiple molecular targets in the bloodstream by DNase I reduces the invasive potential of tumours.
Introduction
Extracellular DNA (exDNA) is a recently discovered component of blood plasma and its elevated level is a characteristic feature of patients with oncological diseases often associated with heavy tumor progression and poor prognosis [1–3]. It has been firmly established that circulating exDNA contains oncogenes including hypermethylated tumour suppressor genes, aberrant microsatellites, aberrant DNA methylation genes and rearranged chromosomes [4–7]. In this regard, diagnostic and prognostic tools are being developed based on determination of the total concentration of exDNA [8], the ratio of the levels of normal and mutant exDNA [9] and the incidence of certain types of aberrant exDNA[10], tandem repeats, etc. [11,12] in the blood of oncological patients. Today, most researchers agree that concentrations of exDNA could be used as a tool for early diagnosis of cancer in combination with other cancer markers [8].
Careful investigation of exDNA concentrations, components, patterns, etc. has become of use after the opening of its possible role in carcinogenesis that is supported by some hypotheses. One of them, the genometastatic hypothesis, has been proposed to describe the phenomenon of horizontal transfer of tumour-specific circulating exDNA originating from primary tumour cells into the healthy cells of distant organs [13–15]. Some authors hypothesize that oncogene-containing exDNA may behave like oncoviruses, and represents an alternative pathway for cancer metastasis. In other words, cancer has the propensity to settle down metastatically in specific tissues since there are DNA-binding proteins or receptors on the surface of these cells [16–23].
Taking into account the possible role of exDNA in tumour dissemination, two enzymes capable of destroying DNA have attracted the attention of researchers as antitumour drugs: bovine pancreatic DNase I [24] and human recombinant DNase I (dornase alfa) [25]. Using several tumour cell lines (Calu-1, SK-MES-1, HeLa, HEP-2 and L-929) it was shown that bovine pancreatic DNase I decreased the rate of tumour cell proliferation and reduced the exDNA concentration in culture medium [26]. The antimetastatic potential of bovine pancreatic DNase I has been demonstrated in vivo in models of spontaneous liver cancer and lymphocytic leukaemia (L5178Y-ML) [27–30]. In an orthotopic pancreatic cancer mouse model, Wen and colleagues showed that DNase I decreased the rate of metastasis development in vivo and reduced the migration and invasion potential of tumour cells in vitro, but had no effect on the migration of normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cells [31]. In addition, some attempts to use DNase I as a drug for the treatment of patients with various metastatic cancers have been made in several clinical trials [32,33]. However, despite this progress, information about the antitumour activity of DNase I and mechanisms mediating this activity remain fragmentary and unclear.
Previously, we have demonstrated the high antimetastatic activity of bovine pancreatic DNase I using two murine tumour models, Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) and hepatocellular carcinoma A1 (HA-1) [34]. It was shown that, together with a decrease of metastasis number and area, DNase I treatment resulted in elevation of deoxyribonuclease activity in the blood plasma of tumour-bearing mice to the level of healthy animals following a reduction of abnormally enhanced concentration of blood serum exDNA.
In this study, we performed a search for molecular targets of DNase I among exDNA in the blood plasma of animals with LLC. For these purposes, we compared the exDNA profiles of healthy mice and mice with LLC, treated and not treated with DNase I. Accordingly, we constructed three DNA libraries of exDNA from the blood serum of healthy C57Bl/6J mice, LLC-bearing mice (control) and those treated with DNase I, and carried out analysis of these libraries by next-generation sequencing (NGS) on an ABS SOLiD™ 5.500 platform.
Materials and methods
Tumour strain
The LLC tumour strain was obtained from the vivarium at the Federal Research Centre (FRC) Institute of Cytology and Genetics (ICG) of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia.
Mice
Male 10–14-week-old C57Bl/6J (hereinafter, C57Bl/6) mice were obtained from the animal breeding facility within the FRC Institute of Cytology and Genetics of SB RAS (ICG of SB RAS), Novosibirsk, Russia. Mice were housed in plastic cages (ten animals per cage) under normal daylight conditions. Water and food were provided ad libitum. All animal procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the approved protocol and recommendations for proper use and care of laboratory animals (ECC Directive 2010/63/EU). The protocol and this study were specifically approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Administration of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (permit number: 5-06-2015). Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation under light ether narcosis and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.
At the start of the experiments, animal weight (mean ± SD) was 20.2 ± 1.5 g. To perform LLC studies, ten animals per group were used. The number of animals in each group was chosen in accordance with the requirement to provide statistically significant data.
Tumour transplantation and design of animal experiments
Ten- to 14-week-old male C57Bl/6 mice were administered intramuscularly (i.m.) with LLC cells (106 cells/mouse) suspended in 0.1 ml of saline buffer into the right thighs. On day 4 after tumour transplantation, each mouse with LLC was assigned to one of two groups (n = 10): 1, control, received i.m. saline buffer (0.1 ml); 2, received i.m. bovine pancreatic DNase I (Sigma, USA) at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg (0.1 ml). DNase I was administered daily except for weekends. The total number of injections was ten. Tumor size was determined every other day using caliper measurements in three perpendicular dimensions. Tumor volumes were calculated as V = (π/6 × length × width × height).
On day 15 after tumour transplantation, blood samples (0.2 ml) were collected from the retro-orbital sinus 60 min after the last DNase I injection. Then, mice were euthanized and the lungs were isolated and fixed in 4% neutral-buffered formaldehyde for 2 weeks.
Surface metastases in the lungs were counted using a binocular microscope. Blood samples from healthy mice (0.2 ml) were collected from the retro-orbital sinus two times with an interval of 7 days.
Blood serum preparation
Blood serum was prepared from the whole blood of healthy animals and animals with LLC treated with saline buffer or DNase I by clot formation at 37°C for 30 min and at 4°C overnight, followed by clot discard and centrifugation (4000 rpm, 4°C, 20 min) to remove cell debris. Serum samples were stored at −70°C until use.
Analysis of the number and area of metastases
For morphometric analysis, lungs were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin (pH 7.0), routinely processed and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, microscopically examined and scanned. Paraffin sections (5 μm) were stained with haematoxylin and eosin, microscopically examined and scanned (S1 Fig). Images were obtained using an Axiostar plus microscope equipped with an Axiocam MRc5 digital camera (Zeiss, Germany). The percentages of the internal metastases area were determined relative to the total area of sections using Adobe Photoshop Software. Each studied group included six mice and five random sections were studied in each specimen, as a result forming in total 30 fields for each group of mice.
Inhibition of metastases development was assessed by morphometry using the metastasis inhibition index (MII). The metastasis inhibition index (MII) was calculated as MII = [(mean metastasis areacontrol − mean metastasis areaexperiment)/mean metastasis areacontrol] × 100%. The MII of the control group corresponds to 0%; MII = 100% means the absence of metastases.
The MII of the control group was taken as 0% and the MII, corresponding to 100%, reflected the absence of metastases.
Selection for blood samples destined for exDNA isolation
At the end of the experiment after the number of metastases was calculated these data were analyzed and distribution curve was built. Taking into account that the distribution was abnormal, the outliners (extreme values) were discarded and as a result the distribution was brought to a normal. The samples from mice, forming normal distribution, were included in further analysis.
Isolation of exDNA from blood serum
Serum samples of six animals of each group were pooled according to the groups. exDNA was isolated from the blood serum by extraction with phenol (phenol–Tris–HCl, pH 8.0) and chloroform, followed by concentration using a QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, USA). The concentration of exDNA was measured by a Qubit™ fluorometer (Invitrogen, USA) using a Quant-iT™ dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
DNA library preparation and sequencing
Libraries of exDNA were prepared using a modified ABS SOLiD™ Fragment Library Construction Kit (Applied Biosystems™, USA). exDNA (~200 ng, Table 1) was sonicated using a Covaris S2 System for 155 s. After blunt-ending, exDNA fragments were ligated with double-stranded adapters by T4 ligase. The ligation products were then size-selected (150–250 bp) using 1.5% LE-agarose gel (Sigma, USA), and eluted from the gel using a QIAquick® Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, USA). Further nick translation was performed (72°C, 20 min denaturation; −95°C, 5 min). Obtained libraries were amplified using primers specific for the adapters: 95°C, 15 s; 62°C, 15 s; 70°C, 4 min; six cycles. The obtained PCR products were size-selected (150–250 bp) using 1.5% LE-agarose gel, and eluted from the gel as described above. Templated bead preparation, emulsion PCR and deposition were performed following the standard ABS SOLiD™ 5.500 protocols. Three libraries, Lh (exDNA from blood serum of healthy mice), LLLC (exDNA from blood serum of mice with LLC treated with saline buffer) and LD (exDNA from blood serum of mice with LLC treated with DNase I) were obtained and sequenced using an ABS SOLiD™ 5.500 platform (the length of the reading fragment was 75 nucleotides). The total volume of the primary sequencing data was not less than 50 million sequences.
Table 1. Concentration of exDNA and DNA libraries at different stages of construction.
DNA- library design stage | Library type | ||
---|---|---|---|
Lh1 | LLLC1 | LD1 | |
2Serum exDNA concentration,ng/ml | 77 ± 2 | 162 ± 5 | 110 ± 4 |
Initial quantity DNA for library preparation, ng | 230 | 244 | 220 |
The amount of DNA libraries, ng | 31.8 | 54.8 | 10.2 |
1Lh, LD and LLLC are DNA libraries prepared from exDNA isolated from blood serum of healthy mice C57Bl/6J, mice with LLC treated with saline buffer and mice with LLC treated with DNase I at the dose of 0.12 mg/kg.
2Data on serum exDNA concentration were statistically analyzed using the Student’s t-test (two-tailed, unpaired). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Data has statistically significant differences with p < 10−12 (Lh vs LLLC), p < 10−7 (LD vs LLLC) and p < 10−7 (Lh vs LD).
Sequencing data analysis
Sequencing data have been submitted to the NCBI BioProject (accession number PRJNA313482).
The sequencing data were pre-processed with the Trimmomatic 0.32 tool [35] to remove adapters and low-quality sequences. After barcode trimming, we assessed the quality of the sequencing data using FastQC software. The data were mapped to the reference comprising 980 repeat sequences presented in the Mus musculus genome. Bioscope software version 1.3 was used for mapping. Read counts per repeat family were normalized by library size and then log-transformed. To estimate tumour-associated gene coverage, the data was mapped to the Mus musculus genome (MM9) with Bioscope 1.3. The number of reads mapped to the exons of Hmga2, Fos, Myc and Jun was standardized to the library size as RPM (number of reads per million reads in library).
Real-time RT-PCR
The alteration in exDNA profile of C-Myc was detected by SYBR-Green-based real-time RT-PCR. The PCR mixture (20 μl) consisted of 5 μl of exDNA (0.1–0.5 ng per reaction), 10 μl of SYBR–Green-containing BioMasterCor HS-qPCR (BiolabMix, Russia) and 0.4 μmol of each primer. The following primers were used: Myc sense 5’-CGACTACGACTCCGTACAGC-3’, Myc antisense 5’-CCAGATATCCTCACTGGGCG-3’; β-actin sense 5’-TCTTTGCAGCTCCTTCGTTG -3’, β-actin antisense 5’-AGTGAGGTACTAGCCACGAGA-3’. The cycling conditions were 95°C for 6 min for pre-denaturation; and 95°C for 15 s, 59°C for 15 s, 65°C for 45 s, for 40 cycles, followed by melting curves analysis. The expression level of each gene was indicated by the number of cycles needed for the DNA amplification to reach a threshold. The amount of DNA was calculated from the number of cycles by using standard curves and the results were normalized to β-actin.
Statistics
The animal data were statistically processed using one-way ANOVA. Post-hoc testing was completed using Fisher’s least significant differences (LSD); p <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The statistical package STATISTICA version 10.0 was used for analysis. The data were statistically processed using Student’s t-test; p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Experimental scheme
Previously, we demonstrated the antimetastatic activity of bovine pancreatic DNase I using two tumour models, LLC and HA-1 [34]. It was shown that DNase I in the dose range 0.02–2.3 mg/kg inhibited the development of metastasis by 60–90% and caused an increase of the deoxyribonucleic activity of blood plasma and a reduction of the concentration of circulating exDNA.
To find possible molecular targets of DNase I among circulating exDNA, we analysed the profiles of exDNA from the blood of mice with LLC after treatment with DNase I using an NGS technique. The experimental scheme is shown in Fig 1. LLC cells (106 cells) were transplanted i.m. into the right thigh muscle of C57Bl/6J mice and, starting from the fourth day (the beginning of the exponential growth of the tumour and metastasis [34]), mice received i.m. saline buffer (control) or DNase I (0.12 mg /kg) for 2 weeks. The DNase I dose of 0.12 mg/kg, providing a high antimetastatic effect in the LLC model, was chosen earlier [34].
DNA sampling was performed at the end of experiment (day 15) because at this stage of tumour development, sharp differences in tumour progression between experimental (DNase I treatment) and control (saline buffer) samples were observed [34]. Moreover, we believe that at this time point of the experiment, all alterations and differences between the groups were in a steady state.
Evaluation of antimetastatic activity of DNase I and sampling for analysis of exDNA
Since in these experiments blood sampling, exDNA isolation and DNA library construction were intended to reveal factors associated with tumour progression and metastasis spreading, prior to DNA isolation the number and area of metastases in the lungs of mice with LLC treated with DNase I were evaluated. Microscopic examination of the lung surface revealed that treatment with DNase I resulted in a significant decrease in the number of metastases (Fig 2). The average number of metastases in the control group was 8 ± 2, whereas the number of metastases in the group treated with DNase I was 2 ± 1, (p < 0.05). Morphometric analysis of lungs revealed that MII, showing a reduction of the area occupied by metastasis, was 36.5% (p < 0.05). No effect of DNase I on the primary tumor size was observed. For further analysis, blood serum from the six mice enclosed in normal distribution after outliners exclusion was pooled and used for LD DNA library preparation. Accordingly, blood samples of the six mice from the control group showing the most aggressive tumour progression were used to create the DNA library LLLC.
Construction of DNA libraries
ExDNA was isolated from blood as described in the Materials and Methods section, and measurements of the concentration of exDNA in the pooled samples showed that in the blood of healthy animals, the exDNA level was low (77 ng/ml) and tumour development was characterized by a two-fold increase in the exDNA level (162 ng/ml), while DNase I treatment led to a decrease in the exDNA level (110 ng/ml), closer to healthy animals than to the control group (Table 1).
DNA libraries were prepared as described in the Materials and Methods section according to an ABS SOLiD™ Fragment Library Construction Kit with some modifications. This sequencing technique allows fragments of 50 bp to be sequenced with maximum efficiency. The first modification was sonication of exDNA samples to unify the length of the fragments to 50 bp, as exDNA samples were characterized by a significant amount of 150–200 bp fragments, a two- to three-fold lower amount of 400–10000 bp fragments and an absence of fragments shorter than 150 bp. The second modification of the DNA library construction protocol was a reduction of the number of PCR cycles to six, which allowed, on the one hand, avoidance of over-representation of fragments and, on the other hand, enough material to be obtained for sequencing start-up.
After the second size-selection of 150–250 bp products, the following libraries were obtained: Lh1 and Lh2, representing exDNA of healthy mice (two technical replicates); LLLC−exDNA of LLC-bearing mice, receiving saline buffer and LD−exDNA of mice with LLC, treated with DNase I. Amounts of ready-to-sequence DNA libraries were 31.8, 54.8 and 10.2 ng for Lh, LLLC and LD, respectively (Table 1).
Analysis of sequencing data
On average, ~25–67 million single-end reads were obtained for each sample of exDNA by means of SOLiD non-stranded sequencing. The sequencing data were pre-processed with the Trimmomatic 0.32 tool to remove adapters and low-quality sequences. After barcode trimming, we assessed the quality of the sequencing data using FastQC software and mapped them onto the Mus musculus reference genome assembly MM9 (Ensemble release 67) using Bowtie version 1.
Any exDNA in the bloodstream could be a target for DNase I, so during analysis we paid attention to redistribution between fragments of exDNA in Lh, LD and LLLC. As the first part of the analysis, we mapped the data to the reference database. The mapping rate varied from 6.95% to 8.33%, which corresponds to a number of mapped reads from 3.8 to 5.6 million. Raw read counts were normalized by the library size followed by log transformation. A heatmap with hierarchical clusterization shows the distance between technical replicates of healthy controls to be apparently less than the distance between treated and untreated mice groups (Figs 3–5).
GC-poor regions
Analysis of FastQC data revealed that exDNA from the LLLC library was characterized by the presence of 3 × 106 GC-poor sequences (0–2% of total content). DNase I treatment (LD) resulted in a decrease in the content of GC-poor sequences to 1.0 × 106 sequences, close to the content of these sequences in the exDNA of healthy mice (0.5–1.0 × 106, Lh).
Tandem repeats
The most striking differences between libraries LLLC, LD and Lh were observed for tandem repeats. ExDNA of mice with LLC was characterized by the presence of a bigger amount of tandem repeats in comparison with exDNA of healthy mice (Table 2). Comparative analysis of 980 types of tandem repeat presented in the Mus musculus genome was performed. For further analysis, 250 types of tandem repeat with representation of at least one sequence per million sequences of the library and characterized by sharp differences between the groups were selected (Table 2, Fig 3). In brief, in searching for further potent oncomarkers, number selection was done to analyze only well-presented repeat types.
Table 2. Abundance of 250 types of tandem repeat in DNA libraries.
Types of tandem repeat, number | Abundance, RPM1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLLC | LD | Lh1 | Lh2 | ||
LLLC> Lh: 204 | 158* | 53193 | 43612 | 34469 | 36318 |
46# | 10221 | 8341 | 3635 | 3859 | |
LLLC< Lh: 46 | 39¤ | 17827 | 15726 | 28777 | 30996 |
7£ | 431 | 504 | 1502 | 1489 | |
Total | 250 | 81674 | 68186 | 38104 | 40176 |
*repeat types, whose abundance was 1.5-2-fold raised during LLC development and dropped after DNAse I treatment
#repeat types, whose abundance was 2.5-3-fold raised during LLC development and dropped after DNAse I treatment
¤repeat types, whose abundance was 1.5-2-fold decreased during LLC development and further declining after DNAse I treatment
£repeat types, whose abundance was 3-fold decreased during LLC development and increased after DNAse I treatment
1RPM—reads per million reads in library
It was found that in LLC development, the content of exDNA was characterized by a high abundance of 204 tandem repeats in comparison with healthy mice (compare libraries LLLC and Lh1, Lh2). The abundance of 158 types of tandem repeat in LLLC was 1.5–2-fold higher, and the abundance of 46 types of repeats was 2.5–3-fold higher than in Lh1 and Lh2 (Table 2, Fig 3). DNase I treatment resulted in a decrease of the abundance of tandem repeats which were over-represented in untreated mice: we observed a 1.5-fold reduction in the abundance of tandem repeats in LD compared with LLLC. In 30% of cases the decrease in repeat abundance in LD reached the level of Lh1 and Lh2 (Table 2, Fig 3).
The abundance of 46 tandem repeat types in LLLC was 1.5–2-fold lower than in Lh1 and Lh2 (LLLC < Lh, Table 2). Treatment with DNase I resulted in a decrease of the abundance of 39 repeat types by 10–30% and an increase of the abundance of seven repeat types by 20–50% (Table 2, Fig 3).
ExDNA of LLC-bearing mice was characterized by a high abundance of repeats belonging to 11 major subfamilies compared with healthy mice (Table 3). After treatment with DNase I we observed a decrease in abundance of these repeats by 15–25% (Table 3). It was mentioned that upon DNase I treatment, the abundance of repeats belonging to subfamilies B, IAP, LTRIS, ORR and RSINE reached the level of healthy mice (compare LD, Lh1 and Lh2, Table 3).
Table 3. Abundance of tandem repeats belonging to 11 major subfamilies in DNA libraries.
Subfamilies | repeats types, found in exDNA, number | Abundance, RPM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
LLLC | LD | Lh1 | Lh2 | ||
B | 19* | 7548 | 6156 | 3326 | 3541 |
ERVB | 11* | 930 | 770 | 693 | 688 |
IAP | 24* | 6682 | 5583 | 3104 | 3272 |
L1 | 19* | 27508 | 23523 | 23984 | 25066 |
LTRIS | 5* | 373 | 308 | 177 | 192 |
Lx | 14* | 3471 | 2861 | 2076 | 2222 |
2# | 51 | 46 | 55 | 59 | |
MERV | 5* | 1461 | 1247 | 995 | 1032 |
MMERV | 5* | 812 | 688 | 451 | 482 |
2# | 80 | 72 | 98 | 103 | |
ORR | 14* | 2158 | 1785 | 1237 | 1317 |
RLTR | 52* | 10201 | 7603 | 5877 | 6380 |
RMER | 22* | 895 | 1119 | 667 | 753 |
7¤ | 1518 | 1934 | 1916 | 2713 | |
RSINE | 3* | 201 | 178 | 132 | 123 |
*repeat types whose abundance was increased in LLC development and decreased after DNase I treatment.
#repeat types whose abundance was decreased in LLC development and further declined after DNase I treatment.
¤repeat types whose abundance was decreased in LLC development and increased after DNase I treatment.
1RPM—reads per million reads in library.
Completely different tendencies were observed in the case of repeats belonging to Lx, MMERV and RMER subfamilies. The abundance of 14, five and 22 repeat types (Lx, MMERV and RMER respectively) was 1.5–2-fold increased in LLC development (Table 3), and after DNase I treatment a reduction of their abundance by 30–50% was observed compared to the repeat content of healthy mice (Table 3). However, in LLC development the abundance of two, two and seven repeat types (Lx, MMERV and RMER), respectively, was lower than in those of healthy mice (Table 3) and additionally decreased after DNase I exposure (Table 3). The abundance of the majority of repeat types belonging to ERVB, L1 and RLTR subfamilies was increased in LLC development and decreased after DNase I exposure to a level of repeat content comparable with healthy mice (Table 3).
Special attention was given to 19 repeat types of B1, B2, B3 and B4 subfamilies having homology to human ALU repeats (Fig 4). In LLC development, abundance of these repeats in the exDNA content of blood was increased two-fold in comparison with healthy mice (7.5 × 103 RPM in LLLC vs 3.4 × 103 RPM in Lh1 and Lh2), and DNase I treatment resulted in a reduction of 20% (to 6.1 × 103 RPM in LD).
Fragments encoding tumour-specific genes
In order to find possible molecular targets of DNase I among tumour-specific genes, analysis of Hmga2, Fos, Myc, Nras and Jun genes known to be carcinogenesis markers [36–40] was performed (Table 4, Fig 5). In the exDNA pool of healthy mice the abundance of fragments encoding these genes was low: total abundance did not exceed 6.87–10.78 RPM (Lh1 and Lh2, Table 4). The major part of the fragments was found to encode Myc (about 50%): the abundance of these fragments was four to five times higher than fragments encoding other genes (Lh1 and Lh2, Table 4). In LLC development, the abundance of fragments encoding tumour-specific genes was 15-fold higher in comparison with healthy mice (compare LLLC, Lh1 and Lh2, Table 4) and 90% of all fragments belonged to Myc. Thus, in tumour development the abundance of Myc-specific fragments rose 15-fold and the abundance of Hmga2-, Fos- and Jun-specific fragments rose two- to three-fold in comparison with healthy mice, whereas the abundance of Nras-specific fragments did not change (Table 4). For DNase I treatment, a 1.5–2-fold decrease in the abundance of tumour-specific fragments of Myc, Hmga2 and Jun was observed, in the case of Hmga2 to the level of healthy mice, while the abundance of Fos was slightly increased (Table 4).
Table 4. Abundance of fragments encoding tumour-associated genes Hmga2, Fos, Myc, Nras and Jun in DNA libraries.
Tumor-associated gens | Abundance, RPM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
LLLC | LD | Lh1 | Lh2 | |
Hmga2 | 1.90 | 1.35 | 1.27 | 0.82 |
Fos | 2.74 | 2.93 | 0.95 | 0.84 |
Myc | 86.14 | 73.38 | 6.40 | 3.62 |
Nras | 1.14 | 1.39 | 1.25 | 0.97 |
Jun | 2.16 | 1.39 | 0.90 | 0.62 |
Total | 94.08 | 81.00 | 10.78 | 6.87 |
1RPM—reads per million reads in library.
Validation of the gene fragments alterations in exDNA profiles of blood serum after treatment with DNase I was performed using real-time RT-PCR technology. For validation Myc gene was chosen because of its highest abundance among other exDNA fragments encoding tumour-associated genes. Six samples from each mice group, which were used for sequencing, were investigated. The obtained data indicated an increase in the levels of Myc-specific fragments among exDNA in blood serum of mice with LLC treated with saline buffer (Fig 6). After the treatment with DNase I we observed an approximately 3-fold reduction in Myc abundance (Fig 6) that coincides with sequencing data.
Discussion
The presence of a large amount of exDNA in the blood plasma of cancer patients was described several decades ago [41]. It was demonstrated that the major part of this exDNA had tumour origin and appeared in blood plasma as a result of necrosis and apoptosis in tumour cells [42]. Attempts to use exDNA as a source of oncomarkers were made [8,9,43,44]. On the other hand, assessment of alterations in exDNA profile as oncomarkers seems more appropriate. For a variety of tumours, a number of mutant sequences have been found in the blood of patients [10], including point mutations (SNP) [45–47], microsatellite alterations [48,49] and hypermethylation sequences [50], as well as loss of allelic variants of oncosuppressors [51,52]. Furthermore, mutant mitochondrial DNA sequences were detected [43]. The biological role of the appearance of all this tumour-derived exDNA is not well understood.
As mentioned in the introduction, Garcia-Olmo et al. put forward a hypothesis for the key role of exDNA in metastasis (genometastatic hypothesis) [13]. This hypothesis has been adopted by other authors as a model for explaining contradictions in the experimental data relating to metastasis. In 2010, Garcia-Olmo et al. showed that exDNAs originated from tumour cells are involved in malignant transformation of healthy cells. The ability of tumour-associated exDNAs to transform healthy cells was proved by detection of mutated K-ras fragments in NIH-3T3 mouse cells after the cultivation in the presence of blood plasma of colon cancer patients enriched with these fragments [53].
According to another hypothesis, exDNA forming complexes with a variety of proteins (histones, actin, peroxidase and other proteins that generate reactive oxygen species, interleukins and others) forms the genic network, also called NET, neutrophil extracellular traps [54]. NETs are used by neutrophils to catch pathogens and to migrate to pathogen locations. It was shown that tumour cells are capable of incorporating their own tumour-derived exDNA into NET, and this promotes tumour cells to metastasize [55].
In view of the possible carcinogenic role of exDNA, investigation of enzymes capable of destroying exDNA has been actively conducted [27,29,31,56]. In previous works using several tumour models, both murine and human, the antimetastatic effect of DNAse I was shown [27,29,31,56]. It should be mentioned, the antimetastatic effect was correlated with a decrease in the exDNA level and increase in the DNase I activity. However, any inhibition of primary tumour growth under DNase I treatment was not detected.
The objective of this work was to study in detail how DNase I treatment of tumour-bearing mice changes the blood serum exDNA profile after the decrease of tumour invasion potential. For this aim we used a murine LLC model which has epithelial origin and is relevant to human non-small cell lung cancer. We compared the exDNA profile of the blood of mice with LLC treated and not treated with DNase I by NGS on the ABS SOLiD™ 5.500 platform and found that the key components altered after the treatment. One might expect that treatment with DNase I would result in non-specific degradation of all circulating exDNA in the bloodstream; however, it led to non-random changes in the exDNA profile.
One of the questions was: are there differences in exDNA profiles between healthy mice and mice with LLC? We found that tumour development resulted in an increase in the abundance of GC-poor sequences, tandem repeats, including repeats of B1–4 subfamilies homologous to human ALU repeats and fragments encoding tumour-specific genes. An increase in the content of fragments belonging to tandem repeats and tumour-specific genes in blood exDNA was detected for different types of disease including cancer, whereas the content of GC-poor sequences in blood exDNA in the majority of studies was shown to be reduced [57–59]. The increase in the content of GC-poor sequences, which are unstable and sensitive to degradation by blood deoxyribonucleases, could be evidence of reduced DNase activity in the blood of mice with LLC [34], which correlates well with previously obtained data indicating reduced DNase activity in the blood of patients with oncological diseases [60–62]. Thus, reduction in the abundance of GC-poor sequences to the level of healthy mice observed after treatment of LLC-bearing mice with DNase I could be a consequence of increased DNase activity in blood plasma.
Upon LLC development, we observed an increase in the representation of many types of tandem repeat that refer to mobile genetic elements such as retrotransposons. Most of the repeats related to long terminal repeats, but there were also many types of LINE and SINE element, as well as other non-long terminal repeats (RMER, ORR, IAP).
A role of retrotransposition in the etiology of cancer remains open. Nevertheless due to a large amount of data concerned tumour-specific insertions of SINE and LINE elements, some hypotheses about a possible role of retrotransposons in tumour development exist [63–65]. Tumour-derived microvesicles are commonly enriched with genes, containing insertions of LINE-1 and Alu elements [66]. Some reports indicated that cancer can be initiated by retrotransposition-mediated gene inactivation by somatic insertion [67] and insertion in tumour suppressor genes [68,69]. So the insertion of full-length SVA (SINE-VNTR-Alu human retrotransposons) into intron 8 of the caspase 8 (CASP8) gene is associated with cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and breast cancer [70]. To date, the most commonly used markers for human carcinogenesis are ALU repeats [71–73], which were shown to be significantly over-presented in breast cancer and colorectal cancer patients [48,49,74,75]. Repeatedly, it was shown that the development of various types of cancer is accompanied by an increase in the abundance of SINE and LINE elements in circulating exDNA [74, 76–78].
We found a two-fold increase in abundance of repeats of the B-subfamily, particularly the B1-subfamily, homologous to human ALU repeats [79]. Treatment of LLC-bearing mice with DNase I caused a drop in content of repeats belonging to the B-subfamily by 20%. Taking into account the oncogenic role of these repeated elements, the observed DNase-mediated effect may give impact to the reduction in metastasis number and area. Together with the change in B1 element content in exDNA, we revealed that treatment with DNase I led to a decrease in the content of L1 elements in blood exDNA (statistically insignificant) and an essential decrease in Lx elements, concluding that Lx repeats could serve as markers of carcinogenesis, particularly for tumours of epithelial origin.
There are some evidences that DNA regions encoding tumour-associated genes are duplicated in tumour cells of different histogenesis, for example, c-Myc was shown to be duplicated in pediatric osteosarcoma [80]. The abundance of tumour-associated gene fragments in blood under tumour progression is a result of necrosis and apoptosis of tumour cells from primary tumour node.
We found that upon LLC development, enhanced levels of fragments encoding tumour-specific genes Hmga2, Fos, Myc and Jun were detected in the blood of tumour-bearing mice, and after DNase I treatment levels of all fragments except for Fos-specific ones were reduced. As cancer markers, mutant forms of K-Ras, p53 and N-Myc are widely used [1,2,10,11,12,45]. Taking into account the abundance of Jun- and Fos-specific fragments in exDNA content in the blood of LLC-bearing mice and the 2.5–3-fold increased level of these fragments in comparison with healthy mice, these genes can be proposed as possible markers of malignant diseases, particularly for detection of lung cancer. So, taking into account the hypothesis of Garcia-Olmo, we assume that there is a connection between the decrease in the number of tumour-associated gene sequences in the blood and a decrease in the level of metastasis.
In spite of essential success in studies of the antimetastatic potential of DNase I, the mechanism of action and possible targets of the enzyme have not yet been clarified. There are two possible mechanisms of DNase I antitumour effect. According to one of them, DNase I via binding with different peptides (histones, actins, peroxidases and other peptides generating active oxygen forms) may degrade exDNA which participates in the formation of NET. Tumour cells are capable of using NET and integrate their own tumour-derived exDNA, facilitating malignant spreading. According to the second mechanism, DNase I is capable of cleaving circulating tumour-specific exDNA which participates in malignant transformation of normal cells through horizontal transfer.
Conclusion
To date, the problem of finding new low-invasion methods for detecting and monitoring the tumour process is one of the most urgent. In this study, we conducted a detailed study of the influence of DNase I on the exDNA profile in the blood serum of mice with LLC and proved the antimetastatic effect of the enzyme. The most important result was finding a spectrum of new possible LLC oncomarkers, which can be regarded as oncomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer. The major differences were observed for the following types of sequence: GC-poor sequences, tandem repeats (sequences with high stability) and fragments relevant to tumour-specific genes (Hmga2, Fos, Myc and Jun). The most important result obtained in the work is that DNase I treatment caused a decrease of the level of B-subfamily repeats having homology to human ALU repeats to the level of healthy animals, and we also showed that the antimetastatic effect of DNase could be due to its influence on the profile of exDNA.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. L.O. Brizgalov (FRC ICG of SB RAS) for assistance in analysing NGS data, Mrs. Albina V. Vladimirova (ICBFM of SB RAS) for cell maintenance and Dr. Valery P. Nikolin (ICG of SB RAS) for his excellent assistance with i/m injections of mice.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper. Primary sequencing data are available at NCBI BioProject (accession number PRJNA313482).
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Russian Academy of Science under the programs 1.7 ‘Molecular and Cellular Biology’ (grant # II.2P/VII.58-1), Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant # 14-04-01007) and scientific schools SS - 7623.2016.4. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Combaret V, Audoynaud C, Iacono I, Favrot MC, Schell M, Bergeron C, et al. Circulating MYCN DNA as a tumor-specific marker in neuroblastoma patients. Cancer Res. 2002; 62: 3646–3648. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gotoh T, Hosoi H, Iehara T, Kuwahara Y, Osone S, Tsuchiya K, et al. Prediction of MYCN amplification in neuroblastoma using serum DNA and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 5205–5210. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Widschwendter M, Jones PA. DNA methylation and breast carcinogenesis. Oncogene. 2002; 35: 5462–5482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Johnson PJ, Lo YM. Plasma nucleic acids in the diagnosis and management of malignant disease. Clin Chem. 2002; 48: 1186–1193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Anker P, Mulcahy H, Chen XQ, Stroun M. Detection of circulating tumour DNA in the blood (plasma/serum) of cancer patients. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1999; 18: 65–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Taback B, O’Day SJ, Hoon DS. Quantification of circulating DNA in the plasma and serum of cancer patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004; 1022: 17–24. 10.1196/annals.1318.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Taback B, Hoon DS. Circulating nucleic acids and proteomics of plasma/serum: clinical utility. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004; 1022: 1–8. 10.1196/annals.1318.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gautschi O, Bigosch C, Huegli B, Jermann M, Marx A, Chassé E, et al. Circulating deoxyribonucleic acid as prognostic marker in nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 4157–4164. 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sozzi G, Conte D, Leon M, Ciricione R, Roz L, Ratcliffe C, et al. Quantification of free circulating DNA as a diagnostic marker in lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21(21):3902–3908. 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fleischhacker M, Schmidt B. Circulating nucleic acids (CNAs) and cancer- a survey. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1775:181–232. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2006.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dianxu F, Shengdao Z, Tianquan H, Yu J, Ruoqing L, Zurong Y, et al. A prospective study of detection of pancreatic carcinoma by combined plasma K-ras mutations and serum CA19-9 analysis. Pancreas. 2002; 25: 336–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lindforss U, Zetterquist H, Papadogiannakis N, Olivecrona H. Persistence of K-ras mutations in plasma after colorectal tumor resection. Anticancer Res. 2005; 25: 657–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.García-Olmo DC, Domínguez C, García-Arranz M, Anker P, Stroun M, García-Verdugo JM, et al. Cell-Free nucleic acids circulating in the plasma of colorectal cancer patients induce the oncogenic transformation of susceptible cultured cells Cancer Res. 2010; 70: 560–567. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bergsmedh A, Szeles A, Henriksson M, Bratt A, Folkman MJ, Spetz AL, Holmgren L. Horizontal transfer of oncogenes by uptake of apoptotic bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98: 6407–6411. 10.1073/pnas.101129998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gaiffe E, Prétet JL, Launay S, Jacquin E, Saunier M, Hetzel G, et al. Apoptotic HPV positive cancer cells exhibit transforming properties. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e36766 10.1371/journal.pone.0036766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen Z, Fadiel A, Naftolin F, Eichenbaum KD, Xia Y. Circulation DNA: biological implications for cancer metastasis and immunology. Med Hypotheses. 2005; 65: 956–961. 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.04.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bennett RM, Gabor GT, Merritt MM. DNA binding to human leukocytes. Evidence for a receptor-mediated association, internalization, and degradation of DNA. J Clin Invest. 1985; 76: 2182–2190. 10.1172/JCI112226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bennett RM, Kotzin BL, Merritt MJ. DNA receptor dysfunction in systemic lupus erythematosus and kindred disorders. Induction by anti-DNA antibodies, antihistone antibodies, and antireceptor antibodies. J Exp Med. 1987; 166: 850–863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hefeneider SH, Bennett RM, Pham TQ, Cornell K, McCoy SL, Heinrich MC. Identification of a cell-surface DNA receptor and its association with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Invest Dermatol. 1990; 94: 79S–84S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bennet RM, Hefeneider SH, Bakke A, Merit M, Smith CA, Mourich D, et al. The production and characterization of murine monoclonal antibodies to a DNA receptor on human leucocytes. J Immunol. 1988; 140: 2937–2942. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.McCaffey PG, Perrino BA, Soderlung TR, Rao A. NF-Atp, a T lymphocyte DNA binding protein that is target for calcineurin and immunosuppressive drugs. J Biol Chem. 1993; 268: 3747–3752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hsieh SC, Sun KH, Tsai CY, Tsai YY, Tsai ST, Huang DF, et al. Monoclonal anti-double-stranded DNA antibody is a leucocyte-binding protein to up-regulate interleukine 8 gene expression and elicit apoptosis of normal human polyneuclear neutrophils. Rheumatology. 2001; 40: 851–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Shi X, Yang X, Chen D, Chang Z, Cao X. Smad1 interact with homeobox DNA-binding protein in bone morphogenetic protein signaling. J Biol Chem. 1999; 247: 13711–13717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hawes MC, Wen F, Elquza E. Extracellular DNA: a bridge to cancer. Cancer Res. 2015; 75: 4260–4264. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fujihara J, Yasuda T, Ueki M, Iida R, Takeshita H. Comparative biochemical properties of vertebrate deoxyribonuclease I. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2012; 163: 263–273. 10.1016/j.cbpb.2012.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alcázar-Leyva S, Cerón E, Masso F, Montaño LF, Gorocica P, Alvarado-Vásquez N. Incubation with DNase I inhibits tumor cell Proliferation. Med Sci Monit. 2009; 15: CR51–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Salganik RI, Martynova RP, Matienko NA, Ronichevskaya GM. Effect of deoxyribonuclease on the course of lymphatic leukaemia in AKR mice. Nature. 1967; 214: 100–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Matienko NA, Martynova RP, Salganik RI. The effect of deoxyribonuclease on the course of spontaneous lympholeukosis in mice from the high leukemia line AKR. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1967; 172: 1457–1459. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sugihara S, Yamamoto T, Tsuruta J, Tanaka J, Kambara T, Hiraoka T, et al. Serine protease-induced enhancement of blood-borne metastasis of rat ascites tumour cells and its prevention with deoxyribonuclease. Br J Cancer. 1990; 62: 607–613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sugihara S, Yamamoto T, Tanaka H, Kambara T, Hiraoka T, Miyauchi Y. Deoxyribonuclease treatment prevents blood-borne liver metastasis of cutaneously transplanted tumour cells in mice. Br J Cancer. 1993; 67: 66–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wen F, Shen A, Choi A, Gerner EW, Shi J. Extracellular DNA in pancreatic cancer promotes cell invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 4256–4266. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Oshadi Drug Administration. Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Oshadi D and Oshadi R for Cancer Treatment. Clinical Trial № NCT01201018. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01201018?term=Oshadi&rank=2
- 33.Rosner K. DNase1: a new personalized therapy for cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2011; 11: 981–984. 10.1586/era.11.90 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Patutina O, Mironova N, Ryabchikova E, Popova N, Nikolin V, Kaledin V, et al. Inhibition of metastasis development by daily administration of ultralow doses of RNase A and DNase I. Biochimie. 2011; 93: 689–696. 10.1016/j.biochi.2010.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30: 2114–2120. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lee TH, Chennakrishnaiah S, Audemard E, Montermini L, Meehan B, Rak J. Oncogenic ras-driven cancer cell vesiculation leads to emission of double-stranded DNA capable of interacting with target cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014; 451: 295–301. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Casadio V, Calistri D, Salvi S, Gunelli R, Carretta E, Amadori D, et al. Urine cell-free DNA integrity as a marker for early prostate cancer diagnosis: a pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013: 270457 10.1155/2013/270457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Salvi S, Gurioli G, Martignano F, Foca F, Gunelli R, Cicchetti G, et al. Urine cell-free DNA integrity analysis for early detection of prostate cancer patients. Dis Markers. 2015; 2015: 574120 10.1155/2015/574120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Winter N, Neumann A, Bullerdiek J. Cell-free DNA in amniotic fluid remains to be attached to HMGA2-implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2008; 28: 1126–1130. 10.1002/pd.2140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Qin J, Alt JR, Hunsley BA, Williams TL, Fernando MR. Stabilization of circulating tumor cells in blood using a collection device with a preservative reagent. Cancer Cell Int. 2014; 14: 23 10.1186/1475-2867-14-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Stroun M, Anker P, Maurice P, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Beljanski M. Neoplastic characteristics of the DNA found in the plasma of cancer patients. Oncology. 1989; 46: 318–322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, et al. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 1659–1665. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Schwarzenbach H, Chun FK, Lange I, Carpenter S, Gottberg M, Erbersdobler A, et al. Detection of tumor-specific DNA in blood and bone marrow plasma from patients with prostate cancer. Int J Cancer. 2007; 120: 1465–1471. 10.1002/ijc.22470 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hao TB, Shi W, Shen XJ, Qi J, Wu XH, Wu Y, et al. Circulating cell-free DNA in serum as a biomarker for diagnosis and prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014; 111: 1482–1489. 10.1038/bjc.2014.470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Ryan BM, Lefort F, McManus R, Daly J, Keeling PW, Weir DG, et al. A prospective study of circulating mutant KRAS2 in the serum of patients with colorectal neoplasia: strong prognostic indicator in postoperative follow up. Gut. 2003; 52: 101–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jackson PE, Kuang SY, Wang JB, Strickland PT, Muñoz A, Kensler TW, et al. Prospective detection of codon 249 mutations in plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Carcinogenesis. 2003; 24: 1657–1663. 10.1093/carcin/bgg101 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Otsuka J, Okuda T, Sekizawa A, Amemiya S, Saito H, Okai T, et al. Detection of p53 mutations in the plasma DNA of patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004; 14: 459–464. 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2004.014305.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.El-Gayar D, El-Abd N, Hassan N, Ali R. Increased free circulating DNA integrity index as a serum biomarker in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17: 939–944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Iqbal S, Vishnubhatla S, Raina V, Sharma S, Gogia A, Deo SS, et al. Circulating cell-free DNA and its integrity as a prognostic marker for breast cancer. Springerplus. 2015; 4: 265 10.1186/s40064-015-1071-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rawson JB, Manno M, Mrkonjic M, Daftary D, Dicks E, Buchanan DD, et al. Promoter methylation of Wnt antagonists DKK1 and SFRP1 is associated with opposing tumor subtypes in two large populations of colorectal cancer patients. Carcinogenesis. 2011; 32: 741–747. 10.1093/carcin/bgr020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhu YH, Fu L, Chen L, Qin YR, Liu H, Xie F, et al. Downregulation of the novel tumor suppressor DIRAS1 predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 2298–2309. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2663 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ma X, Edmonson M, Yergeau D, Muzny DM, Hampton OA, Rusch M, et al. Rise and fall of subclones from diagnosis to relapse in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat Commun. 2015; 6: 6604 10.1038/ncomms7604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.García-Olmo DC, Domínguez C, García-Arranz M, Anker P, Stroun M, García-Verdugo JM, et al. Cell-free nucleic acids circulating in the plasma of colorectal cancer patients induce the oncogenic transformation of susceptible cultured cells. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(2):560–7. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3513 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Healy LD, Puy C, Itakura A, Chu T, Robinson DK, Bylund A, et al. Colocalization of neutrophils, extracellular DNA and coagulation factors during NETosis: Development and utility of an immunofluorescence-based microscopy platform. J Immunol Methods. 2016; 435: 77–84. 10.1016/j.jim.2016.06.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Demers M, Wong SL, Martinod K, Gallant M, Cabral JE, Wang Y, et al. Priming of neutrophils toward NETosis promotes tumor growth. Oncoimmunology. 2016; 5: e1134073 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1134073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wen F, Shen A, Choi A, Gerner EW, Shi J. Extracellular DNA in pancreatic cancer promotes cell invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013; 73: 4256–4266. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li JZ, Steinman CR. Plasma DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus. Characterization of cloned base sequences. Arthritis Rheum. 1989; 32: 726–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sano H, Morimoto C. DNA isolated from DNA/anti-DNA antibody immune complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus is rich in guanine-cytosine content. J Immunol. 1982; 128: 1341–1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kostyuk S, Smirnova T, Kameneva L, Porokhovnik L, Speranskij A, Ershova E, et al. GC-rich extracellular DNA induces oxidative stress, double-strand DNA breaks, and DNA damage response in human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015; 2015: 782123 10.1155/2015/782123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tamkovich SN, Cherepanova AV, Kolesnikova EV, Rykova EY, Pyshnyi DV, Vlassov VV, et al. Circulating DNA and DNase activity in human blood. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1075: 191–196. 10.1196/annals.1368.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Marchenko MM, Kopyl'chuk HP, Shmarakov IO. Extracellular DNA fragments and DNAse activity in blood serum of rats with transplantated Guerin's carcinoma after multiple exposures to low doses of X-irradiation. Ukr Biokhim Zh (1999). 2004. 76:131–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Avall Lundqvist EH, Sjövall K, Eneroth PH. Initial experiences with serum alkaline DNase activity in monitoring the effects of therapy for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Eur J Cancer. 1991; 27(10): 1313–1315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Belancio VP, Roy-Engel AM, Deininger PL. All y’all need to know ‘bout retroelements in cancer. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2010; 200–210. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2010.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Carreira PE, Richardson SR, Faulkner GJ. L1 retrotransposons, cancer stem cells and oncogenesis. FEBS J. 2014; 281: 63–73. 10.1111/febs.12601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Kemp JR, Longworth MS. Crossing the LINE toward genomic instability: LINE-1 retrotransposition in cancer. Front Chem. 2015; 3: 68 10.3389/fchem.2015.00068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Balaj L, Lessard R, Dai L, Cho Y-J, Pomeroy SL, Breakefield XO, et al. Tumour microvesicles contain retrotransposon elements and amplified oncogene sequences. Nat Commun. 2011; 2:180 10.1038/ncomms1180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Helman E, Lawrence ML, Stewart C, Sougnez C, Getz G, Meyerson M. Somatic retrotransposition in human cancer revealed by whole-genome and exome sequencing. Genome Res. 2014;24:1053–1063. 10.1101/gr.163659.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rodriguez-Martin C, Cidre F, Fernandez-Teijeiro A, Gomez-Mariano G, de la Vega L, Ramos P, et al. Familial retinoblastoma due to intronic LINE-1 insertion causes aberrant and noncanonical mRNA splicing of the RB1 gene. J Hum Genet. 2016. 7:9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Roberts SA, Lawrence MS, Klimczak LJ, Grimm SA, Fargo D, Stojanov P, et al. An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers. Nat Genet. 2013;45(9):970–976. 10.1038/ng.2702 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Stacey SN, Kehr B, Gudmundsson J, Zink F, Jonasdottir A, Gudjonsson SA, et al. Insertion of an SVA-E retrotransposon into the CASP8 gene is associated with protection against prostate cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2016; 25: 1008–1018. 10.1093/hmg/ddv622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Lin X, Stenvang J, Rasmussen MH, Zhu S, Jensen NF, Tarpgaard LS, et al. The potential role of Alu Y in the development of resistance to SN38 (Irinotecan) or oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer. BMC Genomics. 2015; 16: 404 10.1186/s12864-015-1552-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gallegos-Arreola MP, Figuera LE, Flores-Ramos LG, Puebla-Pérez AM, Zúñiga-González GM. Association of the Alu insertion polymorphism in the progesterone receptor gene with breast cancer in a Mexican population. Arch Med Sci. 2015; 11: 551–60. 10.5114/aoms.2015.52357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kitada K, Aikawa S, Aida S. Alu-Alu fusion sequences identified at junction sites of copy number amplified regions in cancer cell lines. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2013; 139: 1–8. 10.1159/000342885 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Sunami E, Vu AT, Nguyen SL, Giuliano AE, Hoon DS. Quantification of LINE1 in circulating DNA as a molecular biomarker of breast cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008; 1137:171–4. 10.1196/annals.1448.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Contreras-Galindo R, Kaplan MH, Leissner P, Verjat T, Ferlenghi I, Bagnoli F, et al. Human endogenous retrovirus K (HML-2) elements in the plasma of people with lymphoma and breast cancer. J Virol. 2008; 82: 9329–9336. 10.1128/JVI.00646-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Xue X, Zhu YM, Woll PJ. Circulating DNA and lung cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1075:154–164. 10.1196/annals.1368.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Park SY, Seo AN, Jung HY, Gwak JM, Jung N, Cho NY, et al. Alu and LINE-1 hypomethylation is associated with HER2 enriched subtype of breast cancer. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e100429 10.1371/journal.pone.0100429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Akers SN, Moysich K, Zhang W, Collamat Lai G, Miller A, Lele S, et al. LINE1 and Alu repetitive element DNA methylation in tumor and white blood cells from epithelial ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 132: 462–467. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Román AC, González-Rico FJ, Fernández-Salguero PM. B1-SINE retrotransposons: Establishing genomic insulatory networks. Mob Genet Elements. 2011; 1: 66–70. 10.4161/mge.1.1.15455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Squire JA, Pei J, Marrano P, Beheshti B, Bayani J, Lim G, et al. High-resolution mapping of amplifications and deletions in pediatric osteosarcoma by use of CGH analysis of cDNA microarrays. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003. November;38(3):215–25. 10.1002/gcc.10273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper. Primary sequencing data are available at NCBI BioProject (accession number PRJNA313482).