Abstract
This paper reports data describing development projects for new buildings according to construction costs in North-East Italy. A survey was carried out on local companies undertaking new residential development projects in two Italian regions (Veneto and Lombardy). The aim of this survey was to record new real estate construction projects, collecting both technical and socio-economic cost features. It is extremely difficult to collect such data for the Italian real estate construction sector, due to its lack of transparency, so that the novelty for the Italian scenario is the dataset itself. Another interest perspective of this survey is that socio-economic characteristics were also recorded; they are often studied in urban economics, but are usually related to property purchase prices and values, not to construction costs. The data come from an analysis of Canesi and Marella regarding the relationship between the trend of construction costs and the socio-economic conditions of the reference setting, such as the mean years of schooling of the workforce, housing market trends, and average per capita income.
Keywords: Construction cost, Real estate, Education level, Survey, Italy
Specifications Table
Subject area | Economics |
More specific subject area | Real Estate |
Type of data | Table |
How data was acquired | Survey |
Data format | Raw |
Experimental factors | Sample pretreatment: observations with incomplete data have been rejected and the survey was limited in only two Italian regions. The surveyed variables have been measured both in nominal and in ordinal scales. |
Experimental features | We conduct the survey both by interviews and questionnaires; examining both technical and socio-economic features of the development project. Records try to reflect the socio-economic characteristic of the location the project take place. |
Data source location | Regions: Veneto and Lombardia; Italy. |
Data accessibility | Data are with this article |
Value of the data
-
•
The data partially fill the gap in information on Italian real estate construction costs, due to problems in collecting it, since the Italian scenario is highly opaque and not systematically recorded.
-
•
The records describe new development projects surveying not only technical but also socio-economic features, a novelty on international level.
-
•
The raw data are easy to interpret and can be processed by qualitative and quantitative statistical analysis, e.g., rough set analysis and hedonic regression models.
-
•
The data can identify the impact of some socio-economic and geographic variables on the unitary construction costs of new real estate development projects.
-
•
Family incomes and construction costs are recognized as influential factors in calculating real estate values [1], [2], [3], but there are very few data and studies attempting to identify the relationships between construction costs and socio-economic features.
1. Data
First, we must emphasize that the Italian real estate market is highly opaque and that Italian construction companies hardly reveals information about their building sites, costs or corporate profiles. Therefore, more than elsewhere on the international scene, it is very difficult to collect data, which are private and not publicly recorded or cataloged [4], [5]. In the Italian literature, datasets have little data and the related studies analyze on average 70–80 property [6]. Therefore, our dataset contains information on 70 new residential development projects in North-East Italy, presented between 2006 and 2015. Table 1 lists the surveyed variables (selected both by consulting literature and according to the purposes of this survey), identified by a coding system and clustered into four groups, it also defines their measurement scales, as theorized by Stevens [7].
Table 1.
Cluster | Code | Variable | Measur. scale | Coding system |
---|---|---|---|---|
Building Characteristics | CC | Construction Cost | Ratio | €/m3 |
Vol | Volume | Ratio | cubic meter (m3) | |
NS | Number of Storeys | Interval | n° | |
SH/OD | Social Housing or not | Dummy | 0: social; 1: normal develop | |
Qu | Material finishing | Ordinal | 1: poor, 2: adequate, 3: fairly good, 4: good, 5: excellent | |
Development Ch. | Du | Duration of construction | Interval | Number of months |
CS | Company Size | Ordinal | 1: low; 2: medium; 3: high annual turnover | |
Real Estate Market Ch. | SP | Net surface planned to be built | Ratio | Square meter (m2) |
Val | Market Value | Ratio | €/m2 | |
Socio-economic Ch. | NGr | Numbers of graduates | Interval | n° |
Inc | Incomes | Ratio | €/year inhabitant |
2. Experimental design, materials and methods
Being aware of the low number of cases available, we restricted our analysis and sample new builds in a limited area, rather than the whole country; in order to remove several variables relating to purely territorial dynamics. We establish some basic characteristics shared by all the selected projects, thus ensuring some degree of homogeneity. These homogeneous characteristics are: type of construction (residential apartment block); type of development (new build); period of construction (2006–2015); localization in Veneto and Lombardy regions.
We submitted a questionnaire (Table 2) to several qualified operators in the building sector active in the reference area, stakeholders working for medium-sized enterprises. They were asked to complete a chart, so that we could sample various types of development projects.
Table 2.
Surveyed characteristics | Unit of measure/classification/description |
---|---|
City, province | |
Social housing or ordinary development | 0/1 |
Urbanized or unurbanized soil | 0/1 |
Planning fees | € |
Building volume | m3 |
N° of storeys | (0-n) |
Quality of finishing | 0–5 |
Building shape | |
Plant design | |
Starting date of construction | dd/mm/yy |
End of construction | dd/mm/yy |
Number of employees | (0-n) |
Annual turnover | |
Cost of construction | € |
After collecting all the survey charts, we compiled the proposed dataset, summarizing and processing its characteristics. The variables selected included some chosen from those examined in the literature [8], [9], plus several others judged to be better at interpreting the socio-economic characteristics and formal education level of the local populations, processed by referring to the localization of the building project.
The first category, Building Characteristics, describes the project in physical and technical terms. We chose five variables that intrinsically represent the physical characteristics of an apartment block. The Volume (Vol) of the building in m3, including all interior volumes above ground plus 60% of those below ground; Number of Storeys (NS), to survey possible relationships existing between the height and density of a building and its construction cost per m3; Quality (Qu) of the building, including design work and materials employed, and whether it was a social housing project or an ordinary development (SHO). Lastly, we surveyed the Construction cost (CC, €/m3). All the CC were net of planning fees, which were also surveyed with the submitted questionnaires. Furthermore, the CC are update by applying the ISTAT index of residential construction cost to the whole sample, to avoid any temporal bias [10].
Development Characteristics describe the timing necessary to complete the process and the developer profile. First was Duration of the building site (Du), in months; and the Size of the construction Company (CS). All consulted companies were classified by European legislation as medium-sized enterprises [11]; as they employ fewer than 250 persons, their annual turnover does not exceed EUR 50 million, and their annual balance sheet total not exceeding EUR 43 million. We therefore clustered this variable in an ordinal scale from 1 to 3, in which 1=companies with an annual turnover of 10–20 million euro; 2=those with an annual turnover of 20–35 million euro, and 3, those with an annual turnover of 35–50 million euro.
The category Real Estate Market Characteristics is represented by two variables. The first is the net Surface Planned to be built (SP) in the municipality in question, which represents the vitality of the property market in a given area and is calculated in m2 for each province surveyed. The second variable is the unit market Value (Val, in €/m2) for each province over the construction time, deduced from market prices quoted in the database of the Consulente Immobiliare [12].
In order to capture socio-economic characteristics from the surveyed locations, we identified two main variables: mean gross Income (Inc) of the population in the reference municipality (in €); and formal education, referring to the Number of university Graduates (NGr) in the population of the municipality where the property is to be built.
The data are useful in examining possible relationships existing between residential construction cost and socio-economic features. Such relationships are predicted to be positive, interpreting the literature related to real estate market value, although possible correlations with construction costs have not been demonstrated yet [13], [14].
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Acknowledgements
None.
Footnotes
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.02.005.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2017.02.005.
Contributor Information
Rubina Canesi, Email: rubina.canesi@unipd.it.
Giuliano Marella, Email: giuliano.marella@unipd.it.
Transparency document. Supplementary material
.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
.
References
- 1.Glaeser E.L., Gyourko J., Saks R. Why is Manhattan so expansive? Regulation and the rise in house prices. J. Low. Econ. 2005;48:331–369. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Potepan M.J. Explaining intermetropolitan variation in housing prices, rents and land princes. Real. Estate Econ. 1996;24(2):219–245. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Moretti E. Mondadori; Milano: 2013. La nuova geografia del lavoro. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Canesi R., D׳Alpaos C., Marella G. Foreclosed homes market in Italy: bases of value. Int. J. Hous. Sci. Appl. 2016;40(3):201–209. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Canesi R., D׳Alpaos C., Marella G. Forced sale values vs. market values in Italy. J. Real. Estate Lit. 2016;24(2) [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bottero M.C., Bravi M. Utet Università, De Agostini; Novara: 2014. M. La stima del contributo della certificazione energetica al valore di mercato con il metodo dei prezzi edonici. (in Manuale di estimo, Valutazione economiche ed esercizio della professione) [Google Scholar]
- 7.Stevens S.S. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science. 1946;103(2684):677–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lowe D.J., Emsley M.W., Harding A. Predicting construction cost using multiple regression techniques. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2006;132:750–758. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chan S.L., Park M. Project cost estimation using principal component regression. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2005;23:295–304. [Google Scholar]
- 10.ISTAT, Construction costs index database. 〈http://dati.istat.it/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=DCSC_FABBRESID_1〉, (accessed 13.10.16)
- 11.Commission Recommendation of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, Official Journal of the European Union, 〈http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?Uri=CELEX:32003H0361&from=IT〉, (accessed 13.10.16).
- 12.Mercato ed investimenti, Primavera 2016, Il Consulente Immobiliare, ed. Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano, 2016.
- 13.Lucas R. On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monet. Econ. 1998;22:3–42. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Glaeser E.L., Resseger M.G. The complementarity between cities and skills. J. Reg. Sci. 2010;50(1):221–244. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.