Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2017 Feb 20;8:14471. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14471

Gate-controlled conductance switching in DNA

Limin Xiang 1,2, Julio L Palma 1,2,3, Yueqi Li 1,2, Vladimiro Mujica 2, Mark A Ratner 4, Nongjian Tao 1,5,a
PMCID: PMC5321735  PMID: 28218275

Abstract

Extensive evidence has shown that long-range charge transport can occur along double helical DNA, but active control (switching) of single-DNA conductance with an external field has not yet been demonstrated. Here we demonstrate conductance switching in DNA by replacing a DNA base with a redox group. By applying an electrochemical (EC) gate voltage to the molecule, we switch the redox group between the oxidized and reduced states, leading to reversible switching of the DNA conductance between two discrete levels. We further show that monitoring the individual conductance switching allows the study of redox reaction kinetics and thermodynamics at single molecular level using DNA as a probe. Our theoretical calculations suggest that the switch is due to the change in the energy level alignment of the redox states relative to the Fermi level of the electrodes.

Thanks to its base stacking structure, DNA can behave as an electric wire, but external control of its electronic properties has not been achieved yet. Here, the authors show that DNA conductance can be switched electrochemically when a DNA base is replaced by the redox molecule anthraquinone.

DNA is a unique molecule not only because of its role in living systems but also due to its double helical structure with π-electron stacking of the base pairs that has inspired many to explore DNA as a molecular wire1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. In addition, recent advances have made it possible to design and synthesize DNA with programmable three-dimensional nanostructures13, which have further stimulated efforts to study DNA as device building blocks. Extensive theoretical and experimental works have indeed established that long-range charge transport can occur along double helical DNA via the overlapping π molecular orbitals of the stacked bases1,3,14,15. While short-range charge transport in DNA has been attributed to non-resonant tunnelling,4,7 long-range charge transport is due to hopping between DNA bases3,14,15, dominated by Guanine because its highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) level is closest to the electrode Fermi level among the four DNA bases16. However, to further understand charge transport in DNA and to explore possible device applications, one wishes to electrically switch DNA conductance between different states with an external field. This has not yet been demonstrated. Here we report a molecular switch by replacing a DNA base in double helical DNA with a redox group. By controlling the electrochemical (EC) gate voltage, we reversibly switch the DNA conductance between two discrete levels via the redox group. The population of the reduction and oxidation states follows the Nernst equation, and analysis of the conductance switching allows determination of the rate constants of the redox process at the single-molecule level. Theoretical calculation shows that the conductance switching arises from a change in the molecular energy alignment associated with the redox state switching.

Results

Structures and conductance measurements of DNA

To switch DNA conductance, we replaced one of the regular DNA bases with anthraquinone (Aq), a redox group that can be reversibly oxidized and reduced (Fig. 1b). Nuclear magnetic resonance and molecular dynamics analysis of a similar structure suggest that the Aq moiety stacks on the adjacent GC base pair, and the non-paired Guanine ring rests atop the Aq ring17. This conformation is highly stable as indicated by the melting temperature increasing effect after this modification17,18. It also allows overlapping of the anthraquinone molecular orbitals with those of the neighbouring bases, thus providing a continuous π–π stacking pathway along DNA for efficient charge transport (Fig. 1b). To ensure high stability of double-stranded DNA and high charge transport efficiency, we choose the DNA sequences that consist of GC base pairs only. As a control experiment we also studied DNA without the Aq moiety. We refer the redox modified DNA as Aq-DNA, and unmodified DNA as u-DNA (Fig. 1b). Gel electrophoresis confirmed that both Aq-DNA and u-DNA form double helical structure, and no other structures were present under the experimental conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Figure 1. EC gate control of DNA conductance.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Illustration of the experiment, where the source and drain electrodes are the STM tip and substrate, and EC gate is a silver electrode inserted in the solution. A DNA molecule bridged between the source and drain electrodes via the thiolate linker groups, where charge hops from one base to the next (red arrows) via overlapping π-orbitals. The source-drain bias (Vds), and the EC gate voltage (Vg) are controlled independently. (b) From left to right: redox modified DNA (Aq-DNA), where a base was replaced with an anthraquinone (Aq) moiety (highlighted in blue) at the 3′-end of a DNA strand (see chemical structure in Supplementary Fig. 1a); three-dimensional structure (PDB ID: 2KK5, results are from nuclear magnetic resonance study17) shows that the Aq moiety intercalated in between the two Guanine bases on the other strand acts as a hopping site (red arrows) with its π-orbital overlapping with those from adjacent bases. Aq moiety is shown in blue. Picture is created from 2KK5 in PDB with JSmol software. DNA without the Aq moiety (u-DNA) was studied as control. Both Aq-DNA and u-DNA contain a strand terminated with thiolated linkers at the 3′- and 5′-ends for contact with the source and drain electrodes. (c) Representative current–distance traces (current converted to conductance) of Aq-DNA (blue) and u-DNA (red) in aqueous solution, showing plateaus originated from the formation of the DNA junctions. Control experiments performed in the absence of DNA molecules showing smooth exponential decay (black trace). (d) Conductance histograms of Aq-DNA (in blue) and u-DNA (in red), showing the difference in the conductance peaks. The peak was fitted with a Gaussian distribution and the peak position was taken as the conductance.

We measured the DNA conductance using a scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) break junction technique19,20. The technique used a gold tip coated with wax to minimize ionic conduction7, and a gold substrate (Fig. 1a). The tip was repeatedly brought into and pulled out of contact with the substrate in a buffer solution containing the DNA molecules, during which the current between the tip and substrate was continuously monitored. Individual current versus tip-substrate distance traces were recorded during the pulling process (Fig. 1c) and a plateau in the current traces signalled the formation of a single gold–DNA–gold molecular junction. Thousands of the current traces (∼4,000) were collected, and used to construct a conductance histogram (Fig. 1d), where the peak position indicates the most probable conductance value of the DNA molecules.

We first measured the conductance of both Aq-DNA and u-DNA without applying EC gate voltage, and found that the conductance values for Aq-DNA and u-DNA were 4.0±0.2 × 10−4 G0 and 14±1 × 10−4 G0, respectively, where G0=7.748 × 10−5 S, which is the conductance quantum (Fig. 1d). These values are within the conductance range of DNA reported by others using similar thiolate linker groups21,22,23, but larger than the conductance of anthraquinone-based molecular wire24,25,26,27,28 and other conjugated systems29, such as 4, 4′-bipyridine30. The transport mechanism in the present anthraquinone-DNA system is thermal activated hopping via anthraquinone and stacked bases, which decays with the molecular length slowly31,32 compared with anthraquinone and other tunnelling systems24,25,26,27,28. Control experiments in the buffer solution without DNA molecules, and with single-stranded DNA terminated with two thiolate linkers (Supplementary Fig. 2) shown in Fig. 1b did not reveal peaks in the conductance histogram.

The observed conductance difference between Aq-DNA and u-DNA indicates that the Aq moiety was intercalated into the base pairs in DNA, as shown in literature17 (Fig. 1b). To further verify this conclusion, we performed melting temperature analysis on both Aq-DNA and u-DNA (Fig. 2a). The melting temperature of Aq-DNA (44 °C) is much higher than that of u-DNA (32 °C), indicating that the intercalation of Aq stabilizes the ending base pairs17,18. Despite the stabilization effect, Aq-DNA retains the double helical structure close to B-form structure as shown by the circular dichorism spectra of Aq-DNA and u-DNA (Fig. 2b).

Figure 2. Characterizations of DNA molecules.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) Melting temperature curves for Aq-DNA and u-DNA with ultraviolet–vis absorption spectroscopy, where arrows indicate the melting points. (b) Circular dichroism study for Aq-DNA and u-DNA, where the negative band at around 245 nm, and positive band at ∼265 nm indicates double helical structure for both Aq-DNA and u-DNA. (c) Reversible redox reaction of the anthraquinone moiety involving two electrons in aqueous solution. (d) Cyclic voltammograms of Aq-DNA immobilized on gold substrate with potential sweeping rate varying from 0.01 (black line) to 0.1 V·s−1 (green line) showing oxidation and reduction peaks.

Two conductance states controlled by gate voltage

To switch the DNA conductance, we controlled the redox state of Aq-DNA by inserting a silver electrode into the solution (Fig. 1a)33,34. The silver electrode serves as an EC gate, and the tip and substrate serve as source and drain electrodes. The gate voltage and the source-drain bias were controlled using the standard four-electrode EC configuration with a platinum coil as an auxiliary electrode (not shown in Fig. 1a) in addition to the tip, substrate and silver quasi-reference electrodes. We first characterized redox-switching properties of Aq-DNA immobilized on the gold substrate with cyclic voltammetry, a widely used EC technique that measures EC current while linearly sweeping the substrate potential back and forth. The measured cyclic voltammograms show a peak in the forward potential sweep, and a negative peak in the reverse potential sweep (Fig. 2d), corresponding to reversible oxidation and reduction of the Aq group in Aq-DNA (Fig. 2c). The redox potential of Aq-DNA, determined by taking the average of the oxidation and reduction peak potentials, is −0.46 V versus Ag/AgCl reference. This finding is consistent with that reported for other anthraquinone-DNA intercalation complexes35,36. The separation between the oxidation and reduction peaks increases with potential sweeping rate and the peak heights increase linearly with the sweep rate (Supplementary Fig. 3b,c), indicating that the Aq-DNA was immobilized on the gold substrate. From the areas of the oxidation and reduction peaks, we determined the Aq-DNA surface coverage to be 1.48±0.03 pmol̇cm−2, which is within the range of thiolate-modified DNA molecules on gold electrodes measured by EC methods37. This corresponds to 112 nm2 per DNA molecule, which is relative low compared with the surface coverage of a compact layer consisting of DNA aligned vertically with a small tilt angle.

After characterizing the conductance and redox property of Aq-DNA, we studied conductance switching of Aq-DNA by controlling the gate voltage (Vg). For simplicity, we quoted the gate voltage with respect to the redox potential of Aq-DNA, at which the chances of oxidation and reduction are equal. At each gate voltage, we performed repeated STM break junction measurement in a nitrogen atmosphere, and constructed a conductance histogram from thousands of (∼4,000) individual conductance traces. When the gate voltage is well above 0 V, most Aq-DNA molecules are in the oxidation state (Fig. 3d) and the conductance histogram shows a peak at 3.7±0.5 × 10−4 G0 (Fig. 3a), which is the conductance of Aq-DNA in the oxidation state. Lowering the gate voltage towards 0 V, a second peak at a higher conductance value (30±3 × 10−4 G0) appears (Supplementary Figs 4 and 5 and Supplementary Table 1). We attribute the high conductance peak to Aq-DNA in the reduction state. The high conductance peak increases in height, while the low conductance peak decreases in height with decreasing the gate voltage, which is expected as increasing number of Aq-DNA became reduced (Fig. 3e). The high and low conductance peaks reach a similar height when the gate voltage is 0.0 V, corresponding to an equal number of Aq-DNA in the reduction and oxidation states (Fig. 3b). Further decreasing the gate voltage below 0 V, the high conductance continues to increase while the low conductance peak decreases and eventually disappears (Fig. 3c) as all the molecules become reduced (Fig. 3f). We used the fitting errors (Gaussian fitting) in each of the histograms at different gate voltages as the experimental errors38. The broad distribution (the width in the Gaussian fit) is an inherent property of single-molecule measurements originated from the variation in the molecule–electrode contact coupling, and dependence of the conductance on the couplings39,40, rather than an experimental error. This broad distribution is commonly observed for single molecular measurements of DNA15,21,41.

Figure 3. Two conductance states of Aq-DNA under gate voltages.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a–c) Conductance histograms of Aq-DNA with the gate voltage set above (0.085 V in a), at (−0.002 V in b) and below (−0.078 V in c) the redox potential, where the red curves are Gaussian fits to the conductance peaks. (d–f) Populations of Aq-DNA in the oxidation (Aq) and reduction (H2Aq) states at the corresponding gate voltages. (g) Conductance values at different gate voltages showing two discrete conductance states, high (circled with magenta line) and low (circled with blue line) conductance states. Conductance error is determined by the fitting error of the Gaussian distribution. Gate voltage error is determined by the variations in the quasi-reference electrode (Supplementary Fig. 3a).

The experiment described above shows that one could switch the DNA conductance between two levels by controlling the Aq redox state. Aq-DNA in the reduction state is nearly an order of magnitude more conductive than that in the oxidation state. Another interesting observation shown in Fig. 3a–c and Supplementary Figs 4 and 5 is that despite the sensitive dependence of the peak heights in the conductance histograms with the gate voltage, the peak positions change little with the gate voltage. This observation indicates that Aq-DNA takes two discrete conductance values that correspond to the oxidation and reduction states, and the gate voltage can only switch the conductance between the two values as Aq-DNA is either oxidized or reduced. The switching of conductance between two discrete levels is more clearly shown in the plot of conductance versus gate voltages in Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 5d. Previous studies of redox molecules, including anthraquinone, typically show continuous changes of conductance with the gate voltage20,24,25,33,42,43,44,45, and redox switching of the conductance between two discrete levels has not been reported before. We will return later to the mechanism and implication of this discrete conductance switching in Aq-DNA.

To confirm that the gate switching is due to the Aq moiety rather than DNA, we carried out a control experiment with u-DNA, and did not observe any significant changes in the conductance histogram over the same gate voltage range (see Supplementary Fig. 6). A previous study of gate dependent measurement of DNA conductance also failed to detect conductance switching in regular double helical DNA46. The control experiment shows that the two-level conductance switching was originated from the redox species Aq moiety. Aq-DNA and u-DNA have different conductance values, but a similar stretching length (0.12 nm, Supplementary Fig. 7). Stretching length is the average distance over which one can stretch a molecular junction before it becomes mechanically unstable, which is measured from the plateau length in the conductance trace as marked in Supplementary Fig. 7. The short stretching length observed for both Aq-DNA and u-DNA is consistent with reports in literature, which is attributed to force-induced melting of DNA47,48.

Thermodynamic study of the redox states

We further analysed the gate voltage dependence of the peaks in the conductance histograms of Aq-DNA by calculating the peak areas at different gate voltage (Fig. 4a). This analysis allows us to determine the relative probability of Aq-DNA in the oxidation and reduction states at each gate voltage because the peak area is expected to be proportional to the number of Aq-DNA in the corresponding states49 (Supplementary Note 1). The probability of oxidized Aq-DNA versus the gate voltage shows a sigmoidal dependence (black points in Fig. 4b). The result shown in Fig. 4b was obtained from the statistical analysis of single-molecule measurement, which can be compared with the cyclic voltammetry that measures a large number of DNA molecules. As shown in Fig. 2d, the cyclic voltammetry reveals oxidation and reduction peaks, and integration of the peak areas provide the amount of charge transfer (Q). Knowing that the number of charge involved in each oxidation (reduction) event for Aq moiety is 2, we determined the percentage of the molecules in the oxidation state at different gate voltages50, and the result is plotted together with the single-molecule data from the conductance histograms in Fig. 4b (see Supplementary Fig. 3d–f for details). Note that forward (blue curve) and reverse (magenta curve) gate sweeping curves display hysteresis, but both have the sigmoidal shape. The hysteresis (separation between oxidation and reduction peaks) decreases with the potential sweeping rate (Supplementary Fig. 3b), indicating that the hysteresis is at least partially because the charge transfer between the electrode and Aq moiety is relatively slow compared with the sweeping rate43. The data obtained from the single-molecule measurement falls in between the forward and reverse gate sweeping curves. This is expected because each data point was measured by holding the gate at a fixed voltage, corresponding to an extremely slow scanning rate.

Figure 4. Thermodynamic analysis of the two-level conductance switching.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Conductance histograms at different gate voltages (Vg), where the red lines are Two-Gaussian fits, from which the areas of the low (Sox) and high (Sred) conductance peaks are determined. (b) Percentage of Aq-DNA in the oxidized form versus gate voltage obtained from the reduction (magenta curve) and oxidation (blue curve) peaks in the cyclic voltammograms with a sweeping rate of 0.1 V·s−1, and the high and low conductance peaks in the conductance histograms (black points). Red dashed line is guide to eye. (c) Log(Sox/Sred) versus gate voltages (Vg) and fitting of the data with the Nernst equation (red line). Peak area error is determined by the fitting error of the Gaussian distribution. Gate voltage error is determined by the variations in the quasi-reference electrode (Supplementary Fig. 3a).

The relative probability of Aq-DNA in the oxidation and reduction states at thermal equilibrium is expected to follow the Nernst equation,

graphic file with name ncomms14471-m1.jpg

where E is the applied potential and Eox/red is the redox potential of anthraquinone (gate voltage: Vg=E−Eox/red), n is the number of charge units transferred per molecule, R is the universal gas constant, T is the temperature in K and F is the Faraday constant. Γox and Γred are the surface concentration of the DNA molecules in the oxidation and reduction states, which are proportional to the equilibrium probabilities of the oxidized and reduced species, and can be determined from the areas of oxidation and reduction peaks (Sox and Sred) in the conductance histograms. Figure 4c plots log(Sox/Sred) versus gate voltage (Vg), and fitting the data with Nernst equation yields n=2.0±0.4. This value is expected for anthraquinone, which is a prototypical reversible redox species with a two-electron transfer event. The agreement between the single-molecule conductance measurement and the Nernst equation provides further evidence that the observed conductance switching in Aq-DNA is controlled by the redox state of the Aq moiety.

Kinetic study of the redox states

The conductance histogram analysis described above provides averaged properties of single DNA conductance switching events. To further understand conductance switching in DNA, we also studied the individual conductance switching events by monitoring the DNA conductance (G) over time (t) at different gate voltages. We first detected a plateau regime in a conductance-distance trace (wine arrows, Fig. 5a) at a fixed gate voltage51, which corresponds to the formation of a DNA junction between the tip and substrate electrodes, and then froze the tip in position while recording the conductance (G) versus time (t) for 0.1 s.

Figure 5. Kinetic analysis of redox reactions in single-DNA molecules.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) Conductance versus distance traces, each shows a plateau that corresponds to a DNA molecule bridged between the tip (source) and substrate (drain). The arrows mark the locations where the tip was fixed in position, and conducting switching events versus time were studied. Each trace leads to a G–t (conductance–time) trace with the same colour in b. (b) Three conductance switching behaviours: conductance stays at the high conductance level over the time window (black), conductance switches to the low conductance level and stays at that level (blue) and conductance switches back and forth between the two levels (magenta). Note that red trace shows that conductance drops to zero, due to the breakdown of the DNA junction. See text for more details. (c) 2D conductance (G) versus time (t) histogram with the gate voltage (Vg) set at 0.000±0.005 V, showing two discrete conductance bands, and dependence on time. (d) Conductance histogram at t=0.0 and 0.1 s, showing transition from high conductance state to a mixture of high and low conductance states. (e) Normalized peak area of the high conductance peak versus time under different gate voltages, where the red dashed lines are the fitting of the curves with the rate equation (4).

Figure 5b shows four representative G–t curves at a gate voltage of 0.000±0.005 V, each starts when the conductance is at the high conductance level, or Aq-DNA in the reduction state. The four G–t curves illustrate three types of conductance changes over time. Type 1 (30–40% probability): the conductance fluctuates but these changes are not large enough to be attributed to the switching of the redox state within the 0.1 s time window (black curve). This type of small conductance fluctuations is commonly observed in single-molecule junctions, which are attributed to the atomic scale rearrangement in the molecule–electrode contact39,40. Type 2 (20%): the conductance drops abruptly to the noise level, signalling the breakdown of a molecular junction (red curve). This type is also a characteristic of single-molecule junctions, arising from the finite lifetime in the molecule–electrode contact52,53. Type 3 (40–50%): the conductance switches from the high level to a lower level (blue curve), or switches back and forth between the high and low levels (magenta curve). The high level conductance is about an order of magnitude higher than the low level conductance. This two-level conductance switching is a unique feature of Aq-DNA, which measures reversible switching of the molecule between oxidation and reduction states. To confirm this conclusion, we performed control experiment with u-DNA and did not observe Type 3 switching behaviours (Supplementary Fig. 8).

To further analyse the two-level transient conductance switching, we constructed a two-dimensional (2D) G–t histogram for Types 1 and 3 conductance curves (Fig. 5c). The 2D histogram reveals two distinct bands at the high and low conductance levels, which confirms the two-level switching of the Aq-DNA redox state discussed earlier. When the gate voltage is close to zero, one expects equal probabilities of finding Aq-DNA in the high and low conductance states, as expected by the Nernst equation (see Supplementary Note 2 for further discussions). Figure 5d shows the conductance histogram at t=0.0 and 0.1 s, which indeed shows that if the molecule starts at the high conductance level (reduction state), the probabilities of high (reduction state) and low (oxidation state) conductance levels equalizes over time. We observed a similar result when the molecule starts at the low conductance level (oxidation state, Supplementary Fig. 9).

The 2D G–t histogram shown in Fig. 5c describes the evolution of the high and low conductance states over time, from which we extracted kinetic constants of redox switching at the single-molecule level. At a given time, we obtained a conductance histogram like the ones plotted in Fig. 5d, which shows the histogram at t=0.0 and 0.1 s. The peak area reflects the probabilities of the molecule in reduction and oxidation states at the given time. Figure 5e plots the normalized peak area of the high conductance state (reduction state) versus time at different gate voltages. The peak area decays over time with a rate that depends on the gate voltage. The more positive is the gate voltage (Vg), the faster it decays, which is expected because the probability of Aq-DNA switching from the high conductance reduction state to the low conductance oxidation state increases with the gate voltage. This process can be described with a kinetic model54 that is used in EC study of DNA charge transport55,56,

graphic file with name ncomms14471-m2.jpg

where kf and kb are forward and backward rate constants, respectively, which are related by

graphic file with name ncomms14471-m3.jpg

where K is the equilibrium constant that depends on Vg according to equation (1). The probability of Aq-DNA remaining in the reduction state, Pt(red) can be expressed as

graphic file with name ncomms14471-m4.jpg

By fitting the decay curve at Vg=0.000±0.005 V (black curve in Fig. 5e) with equation (4), we found that kf=9.8±0.3 s−1 and kb =10±1 s−1. These values are within the range of charge transfer rate constants obtained from electrochemistry study on DNA with thiolate linkers. For example, the electron transfer rate constant of dsDNA (20 base pairs long) tethered with anthraquinone36 was shown to be 1.3±0.3 s−1. Other electron transfer rate constants of dsDNA tethered with different redox active groups37,57,58 ranges from 1 to 100 s−1. The seemingly surprising low electron transfer rate and high conductance value are probably due to the two different electron transfer channels in the present hoping dominated charge transport, as shown by Agostino Migliore and Abraham Nitzan's work59. One determines the redox state of Aq, which is the slow EC electron transfer rate, and the other channel dominates the conduction through the entire molecule. This finding is consistent with recent works by Zhou et al.60 and by Venkatramani et al.61, both concluded that relationship between the electron transfer rate and conductance depends on the transport mechanism. Using the rate constants, we obtained Γox/Γred with equation (3), and substituting it into equation (1) leads to Vg=0.000±0.002 V, which is consistent with the actual applied gate voltage. We carried out the experiment at other gate voltages (Supplementary Fig. 10) and found the fitted and actual gate voltages agree with each other (Supplementary Table 2), which further confirms the kinetic model.

Theoretical calculations of the energy diagrams

The above analysis shows that the kinetic model developed for redox reactions can describe the observed conducting switching in Aq-DNA. However, the kinetic model cannot explain why the conductance in the reduction state is much greater than that in the oxidation state. To qualitatively understand the conductance difference between the two states, we carried out first principle calculations within density functional theory at the M06-2X/6-311+G(p,d) level of theory62,63. This functional is suitable for our energy level and electronic coupling calculations, which involve non-covalent interactions, such as π−π stacking. We built two molecular fragments that represent the differences in our sequences, G-Aq-G:C (oxidation state) and G-H2Aq-G:C (reduction state). Both systems were built based on the fragments of 2KK5 in Protein Data Bank (PDB)17 where the Aq is located, with the DNA bases being replaced by our sequences using B-form DNA structure. Circular dichorism spectra show that this is the most probable DNA helical form in our experiments.

It is widely accepted that charge transport through DNA is due to hopping through the guanine HOMO3,14,15, so we focused only on the Aq and H2Aq molecular levels that are the closest to the guanine HOMO level. Our quantum mechanical calculation shows that the Aq HOMO and the H2Aq HOMO-1 levels are the closest to the guanine HOMO level (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the molecular orbitals of the Aq HOMO and H2Aq HOMO-1 have similar spatial distributions; both are mainly localized at the anthraquinone moiety. Electronic couplings and energy levels were obtained based on the two-state model15. Our results show that Aq and H2Aq have similar coupling strengths with neighbouring guanine bases (0.52 and 0.05 eV for Aq; 0.36 and 0.12 eV for H2Aq), but their energy level alignments are different. The H2Aq HOMO-1 level is ∼0.34 eV closer to the guanine HOMO levels compared with the Aq HOMO level. We therefore suggest that the closer energy level alignment is the main reason for the higher conductance in the reduced state. In our previous works we have used ZINDO/S semiempirical method15 to calculate energy levels and electronic couplings. We compared M06-2X/6-311+G(p,d) and ZINDO/S (energy level ZINDO/S calculations, Supplementary Fig. 14) and found a good agreement between methods. Finally, we modified the position of the anthraquinone and calculated the energy levels and electronic couplings and found that our trend is robust suggesting that the energy alignment is indeed responsible for the difference in conductance between Aq and H2Aq (Supplementary Figs 15 and 16). Our observation is consistent with other reported results24,25,26,64,65,66, which shows the conductance of anthraquinone in the reduction state is more conductive than that in the oxidation state.

Figure 6. Energy diagram and molecular orbital spatial distribution.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) For oxidation state, HOMO level of Aq is the closest to the HOMO levels of Guanine. Hole hops from the left Guanine (non-paired) to Aq, then to the right Guanine (paired with C) as indicated by the red arrows. Molecular orbital spatial distribution indicates the HOMO level mainly localized on Aq. (b) For reduction state, HOMO-1 level of H2Aq is the closest to the HOMO levels of Guanine. Comparing with the oxidation state, the energy alignment between H2Aq and Guanines is better. Molecular orbital spatial distribution also indicates the HOMO-1 level mainly localized on H2Aq. The unit is eV for all the energy levels.

Discussion

To verify that the Aq-DNA is bridged between the two electrodes via the two terminal thiolate groups as shown in Fig. 1a, we carried out the conductance measurement on Aq-DNA with either 3′-thiol or 5′-thiol modification (Supplementary Fig. 11). No peaks were revealed in the conductance histograms, indicating that both thiolate groups are necessary for forming molecular junctions and the Aq-DNA is linked to the tip and substrate electrodes via the Au-S bonds. The Aq moiety is located near one end of the molecule, and this end can either bind to the tip or the substrate electrodes (Fig. 3d). Since both the tip and the substrate are Au electrodes with a small potential difference (<0.1 V) controlled in the experiment, we expect similar results with either orientations. Furthermore, we measured current–voltage (I–V) curves and found that I–V curves and 2D conductance–voltage (G–V) histogram are symmetric (Supplementary Fig. 12), indicating the orientation of Aq-DNA in the molecule junction does not affect the measured conductance. This observation is consistent with the hopping model, which describes the resistance of the molecule as a sum of individual hopping steps67,68.

Charge transport in redox molecules, including anthraquinone molecules with two thiolate groups24, have been studied20,25,33,34,44,45 under EC control, where the conductance was observed to change continuously with applied potential. This is in sharp contrast to the discrete two-level switching found in Aq-DNA. For a redox molecule directly connected to two electrodes, its conductance is directly related to the probability of oxidation (reduction) determined by the rates of electron transfer into and out of the molecule, which changes continuously with the potential43,69. In the present case, the anthraquinone is either in the reduction or oxidation state as described by the Nernst equation, which determines the Aq-DNA to be either in the low or high conductance states, respectively. One possible explanation is that the oxidized or reduced anthraquinone provides a hopping site along the entire DNA sequence. To further explore the role of DNA in the charge transport, we carried out the gate-controlled conductance measurements on another anthraquinone-modified DNA sequence with longer length, Aq-DNA-2. Similar two-state conductance switching behaviour with smaller conductance values was observed (Supplementary Fig. 13), which further confirms the involvement of the DNA sequence in the charge transport of Aq-DNA. The experiment also demonstrates that one can tune the conductance of the switcher by changing the DNA sequence.

Our work demonstrates one can introduce an active control to DNA conductance by modifying a base with a redox group, and switch the DNA conductance reversibly between two levels by oxidizing or reducing the redox group with an EC gate. This strategy could be implemented in more sophisticated DNA nanostructures for active device building blocks. As the DNA conductance is an indicator of the molecule in the reduction or oxidation state, it is possible to study redox reaction kinetics at the single-molecule level by monitoring the DNA conductance.

Methods

DNA sample preparation

Anthraquinone-modified oligonucleotide was purchased from Alpha DNA (high-performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) purified). All the other oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (HPLC purified). One of the oligonucleotides (Fig. 1b) was modified with 3′-thiol C3 S-S and 5′-thiol C6 S-S in its protected form. The oligonucleotides were dissolved in 18.4 MΩ·cm deionized (DI) water to reach a concentration of 100 μM and stored at −20 °C. Sodium cacodylate trihydrate (≥98%), magnesium perchlorate (ACS reagent, and ≥ 98%) and cacodylic acid (≥98%) were purchased from SIGMA-Aldrich, and sodium perchlorate monohydrate (for HPLC, ≥99.0%) was purchased from Fluka. All the reagents were used without further purification. Multigene Mini Thermal Cycler (Model: TC-050-18) was used to anneal DNA solution samples. Cacodylate buffer (pH=7.0) was prepared by dissolving 21.4 mg sodium cacodylate trihydrate, 22.3 mg magnesium perchlorate, 196.6 mg Sodium perchlorate monohydrate and 2 mg cacodylic acid in 10 ml 18.4 MΩ·cm DI water. The oligonucleotide with thiolate linkers was deprotected with dithiothreitol (DTT) solution for 1 hour, then transferred to a spin column (Roche Applied Science quick spin column sephadex G-25) and centrifuged to remove DTT and the protection group. The oligonucleotide was then mixed with the complementary strand (Fig. 1b) with a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1 (calibrated by absorption intensity at 260 nm) and annealed by varying temperature from 80 to 8 °C at the rate of 4 min·°C−1, and then kept at 4 °C before measurements.

Gel electrophoresis

The electrophoretic measurement was performed at 200 V, and 22 °C for 2.5 h using 50 pmol of each sample and with 8% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels in 1 × TAE (Tris base, acetic acid and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid) Mg2+ buffer. The gels were subsequently stained with ethidium bromide and scanned in a Biorad Gel Doc XR+ system for sample visualization.

Melting temperature and circular dichroism

Melting temperature experiments were performed in a Varian Cary 300 Bio ultraviolet spectrophotometer with a Peltier thermal controller to determine melting temperature. 10 uM dsDNA were prepared with cacodylate buffer and annealed as for STM-BJ measurements, then heated at a rate of 0.2 °C·min−1 from 20 to 80 °C with the absorbance at 260 nm recorded in 60s intervals. Melting temperature was obtained by fitting the melting temperature curves to a two-state thermodynamic model. Circular dichroism spectra were collected on a Jasco (Easton, MD) J-815 Spectropolarimeter from 320 to 220 nm with a scanning rate of 50 nm min−1. The spectra were compiled by averaging the results from five scans, taken in cadodylate buffer solution at room temperature to replicate the environment during STM break junction experiments.

STM break junction measurement

Gold substrates were prepared by thermally evaporating ∼160 nm of gold (99.999% purity, Alfa Aesar) onto freshly cleaved mica slides and annealed in ultra-high vacuum (10−8 torr) for 3 h. Before each experiment, the gold substrate was flame annealed for 1 min with a hydrogen flame. The STM tip was freshly cut from gold wire (99.95% purity, Alfa Aesar) and coated with Apiezon wax to reduce the leakage current directly through aqueous solution7. All measurements were carried out in cacodylate buffer at room temperature (22 °C). A small (voltage was applied between the tip and substrate (5 mV, otherwise stated). As a control the STM break junction measurement was initially performed without DNA in cacodylate buffer, and the measured conductance histogram was found to be featureless (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Then 50 ul 5 uM double strand DNA was added to the buffer. A large number of current–distance traces (∼4,000) were recorded for each experiment, from which the conductance histogram was constructed with an algorithm described elsewhere51. To minimize noise, the algorithm counted only the traces showing counts exceeding a preset threshold in the histograms, and it selected 10–15% of the traces. For each double-strand DNA, the measurement was repeated three times to estimate the experimental error (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Table 3 for discussions). The EC gate-controlled measurements were performed under nitrogen atmosphere and the cacodylate buffer was purged by nitrogen (99.99% purity) for 30 min before use. The gate voltage was controlled by a biopotentiostat (Agilent). DNA was immobilized on the gold substrate by exposing the substrate in 10 uM DNA solution for 1 h, followed by rinsing with cacodylate buffer to remove non-bound DNA, and then filled with the buffer.

Cyclic voltammetry

Cyclic voltammetry was performed on the DNA modified gold substrate with a platinum wire as the counter electrode, a Ag/AgCl (in 1 M KCl solution) as reference electrode using an Autolab potentiostat. Ten repeated potential cycles of cyclic voltammograms were obtained for each sample with a typical sweeping rate of 100 mV·s−1 (or otherwise state. In addition to characterizing Aq-DNA immobilized on the gold substrate, cyclic voltammetry was performed before and after each STM break junction experiment to check the stability of the silver quasi-reference electrode, and the difference in the redox potential of Aq-DNA was taken as the error in the gate voltages (see Supplementary Fig. 3a for the discussion on the shifting of Ag quasi-reference electrode).

Computational methods

We performed quantum chemical calculations to obtain energy and electronic couplings of the hopping sites using molecular fragments, G-Aq-G:C and G-H2Aq-G:C. Both systems were set up based on the 2KK5 of the PDB, which is conformed by a similar structure to ours with a terminal purine DNA base followed by an anthraquinone17. We obtained the Hamiltonian from a density functional theory calculations at the M06-2X/6-311+G(p,d) level of theory and divided it into their segments, which represent the hopping sites (G and Aq/H2Aq). The energy and electronic coupling were calculated using the HOMO wave function of the Guanine and the neighbour occupied orbitals of the Aq/H2Aq. These energy levels have been widely used as a reasonable approximation of the adiabatic wave function for the charge donor and acceptor70.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

How to cite this article: Xiang, L. et al. Gate-controlled conductance switching in DNA. Nat. Commun. 8, 14471 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14471 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

ncomms14471-s1.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms14471-s2.pdf (480.1KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We thank Shuoxing Jiang and Professor Hao Yan for the help with native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gel experiments. Financial support from the Office of Naval Research (N00014-11-1-0729) is gratefully acknowledged.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author contributions L.X. performed the STM break junction measurements and electrochemical cyclic voltammetry study. J.L.P. performed the energy and electronic coupling calculations. M.A.R. and V.M. supervized the quantum mechanical calculations. N.T. conceived the experimental design and supervised the experiments. All authors contributed to the data analysis and writing.

References

  1. Murphy C. et al. Long-range photoinduced electron transfer through a DNA helix. Science 262, 1025–1029 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lewis F. D., Letsinger R. L. & Wasielewski M. R. Dynamics of photoinduced charge transfer and hole transport in synthetic DNA hairpins. Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 159–170 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Genereux J. C. & Barton J. K. Mechanisms for DNA charge transport. Chem. Rev. 110, 1642–1662 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Giese B., Amaudrut J., Köhler A. K., Spormann M. & Wessely S. Direct observation of hole transfer through DNA by hopping between adenine bases and by tunneling. Nature 412, 318–320 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Porath D., Bezryadin A., de Vries S. & Dekker C. Direct measurement of electrical transport through DNA molecules. Nature 403, 635–638 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fink H.-W. & Schonenberger C. Electrical conduction through DNA molecules. Nature 398, 407–410 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Xu B., Zhang P., Li X. & Tao N. Direct conductance measurement of single DNA molecules in aqueous solution. Nano Lett. 4, 1105–1108 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  8. van Zalinge H. et al. Variable-temperature measurements of the single-molecule conductance of double-stranded DNA. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 45, 5499–5502 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kawai K. & Majima T. Hole transfer kinetics of DNA. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2616–2625 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang Y., Liu C., Balaeff A., Skourtis S. S. & Beratan D. N. Biological charge transfer via flickering resonance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10049–10054 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Naaman R. & Waldeck D. H. Spintronics and chirality: spin selectivity in electron transport through chiral molecules. Annu. Rev. Phy. Chem. 66, 263–281 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cohen H., Nogues C., Naaman R. & Porath D. Direct measurement of electrical transport through single DNA molecules of complex sequence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11589–11593 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Seeman N. C. Nanomaterials based on DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 65–87 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jortner J., Bixon M., Langenbacher T. & Michel-Beyerle M. E. Charge transfer and transport in DNA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 12759–12765 (1998). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiang L. et al. Intermediate tunnelling–hopping regime in DNA charge transport. Nat. Chem. 7, 221–226 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hush N. S. & Cheung A. S. Ionization potentials and donor properties of nucleic acid bases and related compounds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 34, 11–13 (1975). [Google Scholar]
  17. Patra A. & Richert C. High fidelity base pairing at the 3′-terminus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12671–12681 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Haug R., Kramer M. & Richert C. Three-pronged probes: high-affinity DNA binding with Cap, β-alanines and oligopyrrolamides. Chem. Euro. J. 19, 15822–15826 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Xu B. & Tao N. J. Measurement of single-molecule resistance by repeated formation of molecular junctions. Science 301, 1221–1223 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Haiss W. et al. Redox state dependence of single molecule conductivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 15294–15295 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bruot C. et al. Piezoresistivity in single DNA molecules. Nat. Commun. 6, 8032 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Artes J. M., Li Y., Qi J., Anantram M. P. & Hihath J. Conformational gating of DNA conductance. Nat. Commun. 6, 8870 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Guo C. et al. Molecular rectifier composed of DNA with high rectification ratio enabled by intercalation. Nat. Chem. 8, 484–490 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Darwish N. et al. Observation of electrochemically controlled quantum interference in a single anthraquinone-based norbornylogous bridge molecule. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 51, 3203–3206 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Baghernejad M. et al. Electrochemical control of single-molecule conductance by Fermi-level tuning and conjugation switching. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 17922–17925 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Koole M., Thijssen J. M., Valkenier H., Hummelen J. C. & Zant H. S. J. v. d. Electric-field control of interfering transport pathways in a single-molecule anthraquinone transistor. Nano Lett. 15, 5569–5573 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Guedon C. M. et al. Observation of quantum interference in molecular charge transport. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 305–309 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kaliginedi V. et al. Correlations between molecular structure and single-junction conductance: a case study with oligo(phenylene-ethynylene)-type wires. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 5262–5275 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luo L., Choi S. H. & Frisbie C. D. Probing hopping conduction in conjugated molecular wires connected to metal electrodes. Chem. Mater. 23, 631–645 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Nichols R. J. & Higgins S. J. Single molecule nanoelectrochemistry in electrical junctions. Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2640–2648 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Xiang L. et al. Non-exponential length dependence of conductance in iodide-terminated oligothiophene single-molecule tunneling junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 679–687 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yelin T. et al. Conductance saturation in a series of highly transmitting molecular junctions. Nat. Mater. 15, 444–449 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen F. et al. A molecular switch based on potential-induced changes of oxidation state. Nano Lett. 5, 503–506 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Tao N. J. Probing potential-tuned resonant tunneling through redox molecules with scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4066–4069 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gorodetsky A. A., Green O., Yavin E. & Barton J. K. Coupling into the base pair stack is necessary for DNA-mediated electrochemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 18, 1434–1441 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Abi A. & Ferapontova E. E. Unmediated by DNA electron transfer in redox-labeled DNA duplexes end-tethered to gold electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14499–14507 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Pheeney C. G. & Barton J. K. DNA electrochemistry with tethered methylene blue. Langmuir 28, 7063–7070 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Richter P. Estimating errors in least-squares fitting. Telecommun. Dat. Acqu. Progr. Rep. 42–122, 107–137 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  39. Quan R., Pitler C. S., Ratner M. A. & Reuter M. G. Quantitative interpretations of break junction conductance histograms in molecular electron transport. ACS Nano 9, 7704–7713 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Malen J. A. et al. The nature of transport variations in molecular heterojunction electronics. Nano Lett. 9, 3406–3412 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Li Y., Xiang L., Palma J. L., Asai Y. & Tao N. Thermoelectric effect and its dependence on molecular length and sequence in single DNA molecules. Nat. Commun. 7, 11294 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Huang C., Rudnev A. V., Hong W. & Wandlowski T. Break junction under electrochemical gating: testbed for single-molecule electronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 889–901 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Migliore A. & Nitzan A. Irreversibility in redox molecular conduction: single versus double metal-molecule interfaces. Electrochim. Acta 160, 363–375 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Kuznetsov A. M. & Ulstrup J. Single-molecule electron tunnelling through multiple redox levels with environmental relaxation. J. Electroanal. Chem. 564, 209–222 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  45. Haiss W. et al. Single-molecule conductance of redox molecules in electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 6703–6712 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Hihath J., Chen F., Zhang P. & Tao N. Thermal and electrochemical gate effects on DNA conductance. J. Phy. Conden. Matter 19, 215202 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  47. Bruot C., Xiang L., Palma J. L. & Tao N. Effect of mechanical stretching on DNA conductance. ACS Nano 9, 88–94 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Bruot C., Xiang L., Palma J. L., Li Y. & Tao N. Tuning the electromechanical properties of single DNA molecular junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13933–13937 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Artés J. M., López-Martínez M., Díez-Pérez I., Sanz F. & Gorostiza P. Conductance switching in single wired redox proteins. Small 10, 2537–2541 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Eckermann A. L., Feld D. J., Shaw J. A. & Meade T. J. Electrochemistry of redox-active self-assembled monolayers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 254, 1769–1802 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Guo S., Hihath J., Díez-Pérez I. & Tao N. Measurement and statistical analysis of single-molecule current–voltage characteristics, transition voltage spectroscopy, and tunneling barrier height. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19189–19197 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Diez-Perez I. et al. Controlling single-molecule conductance through lateral coupling of π orbitals. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 226–231 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Huang Z., Chen F., Bennett P. A. & Tao N. Single molecule junctions formed via au−thiol contact:  stability and breakdown mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 13225–13231 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. O'Dea J. J. & Osteryoung J. G. Characterization of quasi-reversible surface processes by square-wave voltammetry. Anal. Chem. 65, 3090–3097 (1993). [Google Scholar]
  55. McWilliams M. A., Bhui R., Taylor D. W. & Slinker J. D. The electronic influence of abasic sites in DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11150–11155 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wohlgamuth C. H. et al. Electrochemistry of DNA monolayers modified with a perylenediimide base surrogate. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 29084–29090 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  57. Gorodetsky A. A., Buzzeo M. C. & Barton J. K. DNA-mediated electrochemistry. Bioconjug. Chem. 19, 2285–2296 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Slinker J. D., Muren N. B., Renfrew S. E. & Barton J. K. DNA charge transport over 34 nm. Nat. Chem. 3, 228–233 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Migliore A. & Nitzan A. Irreversibility and hysteresis in redox molecular conduction junctions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9420–9432 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Zhou X.-S. et al. Do molecular conductances correlate with electrochemical rate constants? experimental insights. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 7509–7516 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Venkatramani R., Wierzbinski E., Waldeck D. H. & Beratan D. N. Breaking the simple proportionality between molecular conductances and charge transfer rates. Faraday Discuss. 174, 57–78 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Zhao Y. & Truhlar D. G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals. Theor. Chem. Acc. 120, 215–241 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhao Y. & Truhlar D. G. Density functionals with broad applicability in chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 41, 157–167 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Markussen T., Schiötz J. & Thygesen K. S. Electrochemical control of quantum interference in anthraquinone-based molecular switches. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 224104 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Markussen T., Stadler R. & Thygesen K. S. The relation between structure and quantum interference in single molecule junctions. Nano Lett. 10, 4260–4265 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. van Dijk E. H., Myles D. J. T., van der Veen M. H. & Hummelen J. C. Synthesis and properties of an anthraquinone-based redox switch for molecular electronics. Org. Lett. 8, 2333–2336 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Segal D., Nitzan A., Ratner M. & Davis W. B. Activated conduction in microscopic molecular junctions. J. Phy. Chem. B 104, 2790–2793 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  68. Nitzan A. The relationship between electron transfer rate and molecular conduction 2. The sequential hopping case. Irs. J. Chem 42, 163–166 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  69. Zhang J. et al. Single-molecule electron transfer in electrochemical environments. Chem. Rev. 108, 2737–2791 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Berlin Y. A., Voityuk A. A. & Ratner M. A. DNA base pair stacks with high electric conductance: a systematic structural search. ACS Nano 6, 8216–8225 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures, Supplementary Tables, Supplementary Notes and Supplementary References

ncomms14471-s1.pdf (1.7MB, pdf)
Peer Review File
ncomms14471-s2.pdf (480.1KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES