Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2017 Feb 22;2(1):e00004-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00004-17

Fluorocycline TP-271 Is Potent against Complicated Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Pathogens

Trudy H Grossman a,*,, Corey Fyfe a, William O’Brien a,*, Meredith Hackel b, Mary Beth Minyard c,*, Ken B Waites d, Jacques Dubois e, Timothy M Murphy f,*, Andrew M Slee f,*, William J Weiss g, Joyce A Sutcliffe a,*
Editor: Mariana Castanheirah
PMCID: PMC5322343  PMID: 28251179

Rising resistance rates for macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams in the most common pathogens associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are of concern, especially for cases of moderate to severe infections in vulnerable populations such as the very young and the elderly. New antibiotics that are active against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus are needed for use in the empirical treatment of the most severe forms of this disease. TP-271 is a promising new fluorocycline antibiotic demonstrating in vitro potency and nonclinical efficacy by intravenous and oral administration against the major pathogens associated with moderate to severe CABP.

KEYWORDS: TP-271, community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, fluorocycline

ABSTRACT

TP-271 is a novel, fully synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic in clinical development for the treatment of respiratory infections caused by susceptible and multidrug-resistant pathogens. TP-271 was active in MIC assays against key community respiratory Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90 = 0.03 µg/ml), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; MIC90 = 0.25 µg/ml), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA; MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml), Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC90 = 0.03 µg/ml), Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml), and Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC90 ≤0.016 µg/ml). TP-271 showed activity (MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml) against community-acquired MRSA expressing Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). MIC90 values against Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydia pneumoniae were 0.004, 1, and 4 µg/ml, respectively. TP-271 was efficacious in neutropenic and immunocompetent animal pneumonia models, generally showing, compared to the burden at the start of dosing, ~2 to 5 log10 CFU reductions against MRSA, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae infections when given intravenously (i.v.) and ~1 to 4 log10 CFU reductions when given orally (p.o.). TP-271 was potent against key community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) pathogens and was minimally affected, or unaffected, by tetracycline-specific resistance mechanisms and fluoroquinolone or macrolide drug resistance phenotypes.

IMPORTANCE Rising resistance rates for macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and β-lactams in the most common pathogens associated with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) are of concern, especially for cases of moderate to severe infections in vulnerable populations such as the very young and the elderly. New antibiotics that are active against multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus are needed for use in the empirical treatment of the most severe forms of this disease. TP-271 is a promising new fluorocycline antibiotic demonstrating in vitro potency and nonclinical efficacy by intravenous and oral administration against the major pathogens associated with moderate to severe CABP.

INTRODUCTION

Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) is a serious condition associated with mortality rates estimated to be as high as 12 to 14% for hospitalized individuals and 25 to 40% for those admitted to intensive care units (13). Lower respiratory tract infections were the second greatest cause of deaths and years of life lost in 2013 as reported by The Global Burden of Disease Study, with the highest incidence occurring in children <5 years and adults >65 years (1, 4). The Centers for Disease Control estimated that 30% of severe Streptococcus pneumoniae infections are fully resistant to one or more antibiotics; drug-resistant S. pneumoniae infections complicate treatment and cause approximately 7,000 deaths per year (5). Excess medical costs associated with treating drug-resistant S. pneumoniae infections were estimated at approximately $96 million per year.

The bacterial etiology of CABP varies with severity of disease; however, S. pneumoniae is the most frequent cause of CABP across all levels of severity (6). The incidence of infections by Staphylococcus aureus and Legionella spp. increases with more-severe CABP, whereas Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae are generally associated with mild to moderate CABP (6, 7). Recently, large medical centers in the United States saw a dramatic increase in the incidence of infections caused by S. aureus, including those caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, once considered rare in CABP (8, 9). A survey of 59 United States hospitals, involving 4,543 patients with culture-positive pneumonias between January 2002 and January 2004, identified S. aureus and MRSA as potential pathogens in 25.5% and 8.9% of the cases, respectively (8). Further, in this study, S. aureus was identified by logistic regression analysis as the only pathogen independently associated with mortality. Most of the MRSA strains causing health care-associated pneumonia, hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia, and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia are hospital-acquired MRSA (HA-MRSA) strains containing staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type I (SCCmec I) to SCCmec III (10). A new variant of MRSA, identified as community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) containing SCCmec IV, has emerged globally as a potent pulmonary pathogen (10). This strain type typically carries a bacteriophage encoding Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a toxin that destroys polymorphonuclear leukocytes and is associated with tissue necrosis and increased virulence (11, 12). The increased incidence of CA-MRSA infections in more-severe cases of CABP limits the empirical use of fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and most currently marketed β-lactams due to high resistance rates (13, 14).

Although there are numerous therapies for S. pneumoniae infection, including oral drugs in the macrolide, fluoroquinolone, and β-lactam classes, resistance to β-lactams and macrolides is increasing (6). Resistance to currently approved antibiotics in other respiratory pathogens is also increasing. Global surveillance by the Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial (TEST) in 2004 to 2013 found that penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP) comprised 14.8% of the S. pneumoniae isolates and that the percentages were highest in the Middle East (24.7%), Africa (28.1%), and the Asia-Pacific Rim (30.1%) (15). Erythromycin resistance during the same period was 32.7% and was highly correlated with penicillin resistance. TEST also found that the global rate of β-lactamase production among H. influenzae isolates collected from 2004 to 2013 was 20.1%. In the AWARE ceftaroline surveillance program, 96.4% of Moraxella catarrhalis isolates collected in the United States from 2008 to 2010 were β-lactamase producers (16). The increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis significantly impacts the utility of currently available antibiotics (17). Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae has increased worldwide, with >90% of clinical isolates from Japan and China and ~20% of isolates in some European countries having high-level resistance to azithromycin (18). A surveillance study performed in the United States from 2012 to 2014 reported a macrolide resistance rate of 13.2% (19). Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae is clinically significant, often requiring switching to other drug classes such as tetracyclines or fluoroquinolones (18).

Tetracycline antibiotics are well known for their broad spectrum, which includes a wide range of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, spirochetes, and obligate intracellular bacteria. TP-271, a novel fluorocycline antibiotic of the tetracycline class (Fig. 1), is a candidate for the treatment of serious infections, including those caused by multidrug-resistant pathogens. On the basis of in vitro and in vivo evaluations, TP-271 shows potential to treat key susceptible and resistant organisms associated with moderate to severe CABP.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Chemical structure of TP-271.

RESULTS

TP-271 mechanism of action.

The site of action of tetracycline drugs such as TP-271 is the 30S ribosomal subunit; drug binding interferes with access of aminoacyl-tRNA to the A-site on the mRNA-ribosome complex, preventing new amino acid addition and peptide chain growth (20, 21). TP-271 showed potent mechanism-based antitranslational activity in an in vitro coupled transcription/translation (TnT) assay in the presence and absence of the tetracycline-specific ribosomal protection protein Tet(M), which confers high-level resistance to tetracycline in bacteria (22). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) determined in the TnT assay for TP-271 was 0.18 ± 0.08 µg/ml; in comparison, the IC50 for tetracycline was 1.1 ± 0.07 µg/ml and for the nontetracycline translation inhibitor linezolid the IC50 was 1.3 ± 0.28 µg/ml. In the presence of Tet(M), the IC50 for TP-271 was unaffected (0.13 ± 0.04 µg/ml) whereas the IC50 for tetracycline increased by ~5-fold (5.8 ± 1.1 µg/ml), consistent with the tetracycline resistance seen with Tet(M)-expressing organisms. Thus, TP-271 is distinguished by its being a Tet(M)-insensitive novel tetracycline.

Activity of TP-271 against CABP pathogens in vitro.

TP-271 was active against key community respiratory Gram-positive pathogens (Table 1), including S. pneumoniae (MIC90 = 0.03 µg/ml), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA; MIC90 = 0.25 µg/ml), MRSA (MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml), and Streptococcus pyogenes (MIC90 = 0.03 µg/ml). TP-271 was active (MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml) against CA-MRSA expressing PVL. As shown by the MIC90 data, TP-271 was ≥1,000-fold more potent than tetracycline against S. pneumoniae and S. pyogenes and 128-fold more potent against S. aureus. TP-271 was also potent against respiratory Gram-negative pathogens H. influenzae (MIC90 = 0.12 µg/ml) and M. catarrhalis (MIC90 = ≤0.016 µg/ml).

TABLE 1 .

Susceptibilities of CABP pathogens to TP-271 and comparatorsa

Organism No. of isolates MIC50/MIC90 (μg/ml), MIC range (μg/ml)
TP-271 TET TGC MACg FQh LZD VAN
Streptococcus pneumoniae 267 ≤0.016/0.03, ≤0.016–0.03 32/>32,b ≤0.016–>32 ≤0.016/≤0.016,c ≤0.016–≤0.016 >32/>32, ≤0.016–>32 1/1, 0.25–32 1/1,b 0.12–2 0.5/0.5,b ≤0.016–0.5
Streptococcus pyogenes 100 ≤0.016/0.03, ≤0.016–0.03 0.5/>32, 0.12–32 ≤0.016/≤0.016,d ≤0.016–0.06 0.06/>32, ≤0.016–>32 0.5/1, 0.25–2 1/2, 0.5–2 0.5/0.5, 0.25–0.5
Staphylococcus aureus 155 0.06/0.25, ≤0.03–1 ≤2/32, 0.06–32 0.12/0.25, ≤0.016–0.5 >4/>4, 0.25–4 >4/>4, ≤0.12–>4 2/4, 0.5–64 1/1, ≤0.5–8
MRSA 124 0.06/0.12, ≤0.016–1 ≤2/32, 0.06–32 0.12/0.25, ≤0.016–0.5 >4/>4, 0.25–4 >4/>4, ≤0.12–>4 2/4, 1–64 1/1, ≤0.5–8
MRSA, PVL+ 25 0.06/0.12, 0.06–0.12 ≤2/≤2, ≤2–16 0.12/0.12, 0.06–0.25 >4/>4, 1–>4 2/>4, ≤0.12–>4 2/2, 1–4 1/1, ≤0.5–1
MSSA 31 0.12/0.25, ≤0.03–0.25 ≤2/≤2, ≤2–32 0.12/0.25, 0.03–0.25 1/>4, 0.5–4 0.25/0.5, ≤0.12–>4 2/4, 0.5–4 1/1, ≤0.5–1
Haemophilus influenzae 65 0.03/0.12, ≤0.016–0.25 0.5/4, 0.12–16 0.06/0.25, ≤0.016–0.5 8/8, 0.06–16 ≤0.016/0.03, ≤0.016–0.12 8/16, 4–32 >32/>32,e 16–>32
Moraxella catarrhalis 57 ≤0.016/≤0.016, ≤0.016–0.031 0.5/32, 0.12–32 ≤0.016/0.031, ≤0.016–0.12 0.06/0.25, ≤0.016–4 0.03/0.06, 0.03–0.12 8/8, 2–32 >32/>32,f 16–>32
a

TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; MAC, macrolide (erythromycin, azithromycin, or clarithromycin); FQ, fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin); LZD, linezolid; VAN, vancomycin.

b

256 S. pneumoniae isolates.

c

137 S. pneumoniae isolates.

d

64 S. pyogenes isolates.

e

51 H. influenzae isolates.

f

43 M. catarrhalis isolates.

g

Isolates were tested with either azithromycin, erythromycin, or clarithromycin, and all MIC values were pooled for MAC MIC50 and MIC90 determinations.

h

isolates were tested with either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, and all MIC values were pooled for FQ MIC50 and MIC90 determinations.

For hospitalized CABP patients on the general wards, the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines currently recommend a respiratory fluoroquinolone or the combination of a β-lactam and a macrolide (7). For patients with severe CABP requiring intensive care unit admission, the guidelines recommend a β-lactam plus either azithromycin or a respiratory fluoroquinolone; if MRSA is a concern, either vancomycin or linezolid should be added (7). TP-271 retained good antibacterial potency against subsets of S. pneumoniae resistant to penicillin (MIC90 = 0.03 μg/ml) and macrolides (MIC90 = 0.03 μg/ml) and against MRSA displaying resistance to fluoroquinolones (MIC90 = 0.25 μg/ml), macrolides (MIC90 = 0.25 μg/ml), and linezolid (MIC range, ≤0.016 to 0.5 μg/ml) (Table 2). TP-271 was also active against MRSA isolates displaying nonsusceptibility to daptomycin (MIC range, ≤0.016 to 0.25 μg/ml), a drug used in the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections, excluding pneumonia (Table 2).

TABLE 2 .

Susceptibilities of drug-resistant MRSA and S. pneumoniae to TP-271 and comparatorsa

Organism Phenotypeb MIC50/MIC90 or range (µg/ml)
TP-271 LZD DAP VAN TGC TET MACh FQi
S. pneumoniae Pen-Rc (n = 125) ≤0.016/0.03 1/1 ND 0.5/0.5 ≤0.016/≤0.016d 32/>32 >32/>32 1/1
MAC-R (n = 209) ≤0.016/0.03 1/1g ND 0.5/0.5g ≤0.016/≤0.016e 32/>32f >32/>32 1/1g
MRSA FQ-R (n = 97) 0.06/0.25 2/4 0.25/2 1/1 0.12/0.5 1/32 >32/>32 8/>32
MAC-R (n = 101) 0.06/0.25 2/4 0.25/1 1/1 0.12/0.5 1/>32 >32/>32 8/>32
LZD-R (n = 9) ≤0.016–0.5 8–64 0.12–0.5 0.5–2 0.031–0.5 0.5–>32 0.5–>32 8–>32
Dap-NS (n = 5) ≤0.016–0.25 2–2 2–4 2–8 ≤0.016–0.5 0.063–>32 >32–>32 0.5–16
a

TET, tetracycline; TGC, tigecycline; MAC, macrolide (erythromycin, azithromycin, or clarithromycin); FQ, fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin); LZD, linezolid; VAN, vancomycin.

b

MAC-R, resistant to one or more of azithromycin, erythromycin, and clarithromycin; FQ-R, resistant to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin or both; LZD-R, resistant to linezolid; DAP-NS, nonsusceptible to daptomycin. Resistance (R) and nonsusceptibility (NS) were determined as defined by CLSI.

c

Penicillin MIC, ≥2 µg/ml.

d

58 S. pneumoniae isolates.

e

82 S. pneumoniae isolates.

f

201 S. pneumoniae isolates.

g

185 S. pneumoniae isolates.

h

Isolates were tested with either azithromycin, erythromycin, or clarithromycin, and all MIC values were pooled for MIC50 and MIC90 determinations.

i

Isolates were tested with either ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, and all MIC values were pooled for MIC50 and MIC90 determinations.

As recommended in the August 2016 FDA publication of guidance for microbiological data for systemic antibacterial drug products (23), TP-271 was tested for retention of microbiological activity in the presence of 5% bovine pulmonary surfactant and found to be equally active against S. aureus ATCC 29213 (MIC = 0.063 µg/ml in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth [ca-MHB]; MIC = 0.031 µg/ml in ca-MHB + 5% bovine pulmonary surfactant). The MIC of the positive control, daptomycin, was elevated by 512-fold in ca-MHB + 5% bovine pulmonary surfactant, as expected (24).

Activity of TP-271 against atypical respiratory pathogens.

TP-271 was tested against atypical pathogens commonly associated with CABP: L. pneumophila, M. pneumoniae, and the obligate intracellular pathogen C. pneumoniae (Table 3). TP-271 showed an MIC90 of 1 µg/ml against a panel comprised of 20 isolates of L. pneumophila serogroup 1 and 10 isolates each of serogroups 2 to 6; TP-271 was found to be similarly potent against all serogroups when assessed individually (25). When tested by agar dilution in buffer yeast extract (BYE), it was noted that the TP-271 and tetracycline MIC values for the quality control strain S. aureus ATCC 29213 were 128-fold and 64-fold higher, respectively, compared to results in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton agar after 48 h of incubation, the duration of incubation for L. pneumophila testing (data not shown). This finding suggested that the BYE medium used in the testing of L. pneumophila may have reduced the activity of TP-271 and inflated the MIC values for L. pneumophila.

TABLE 3 .

Susceptibilities of atypical pathogens to TP-271 and comparators

Organism No. of isolates MIC50/MIC90 (μg/ml), MIC range (μg/ml)
TP-271 TETa TGC MACb LVX
Legionella pneumophila 70 0.25/1, ≤0.004–2 4/8, 0.5-8 NDc 0.25/0.5, 0.06–1 ND
Chlamydia pneumoniae 10 4/4, 2–4 0.25/0.25, 0.12–0.25 ND 0.25/0.25, 0.12–0.25 ND
Mycoplasma pneumoniae 20 0.001/0.004, 0.0005–0.008 0.063/0.12, 0.032–0.12 0.031/0.031, 0.016–0.12 0.000063/8, 0.000032–16 0.5/0.5, 0.25–0.5
a

Doxycycline for C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae, tetracycline for L. pneumophila.

b

Azithromycin for C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae, erythromycin for L. pneumophila.

c

ND, not determined.

The TP-271 MIC90 was 0.004 μg/ml (range, 0.0005 to 0.008 μg/ml) against a panel of 20 clinical isolates of M. pneumoniae which included 4 organisms that were macrolide resistant (azithromycin MICs, ≥4 μg/ml) (Table 3).

TP-271 was tested against 10 human isolates of C. pneumoniae in an intracellular infection assay with HEp-2 cells and showed an MIC90 of 4 µg/ml (Table 3). Similar to the interference from media observed in L. pneumophila assays, the MIC values of TP-271 were 4- to 32-fold higher in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) than in ca-MHB for the quality control organisms S. aureus ATCC 29213, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 tested by broth microdilution assay (data not shown). These results suggested that the use of EMEM reduced the activity of TP-271 and artificially raised MIC values.

The effect of common tetracycline resistance determinants on in vitro activity of TP-271.

Given the widespread dissemination of tetracycline resistance determinants in clinical isolates (26), it is important that a new tetracycline-class antibiotic be active against the major tetracycline resistance mechanisms. TP-271 was tested against a previously described panel of isogenic strains overexpressing major tetracycline resistance genes from an arabinose-inducible promoter on a plasmid in laboratory E. coli strain DH10B (22). The overexpressed genes encoded two major efflux mechanisms found in Gram-negative bacteria, Tet(A) and Tet(B); a major Gram-positive efflux mechanism, Tet(K); a major ribosomal protection mechanism, Tet(M); and Tet(X), a secreted flavin-dependent monooxygenase, originally identified in Bacteroides fragilis, capable of covalently inactivating tetracycline (22, 27, 28). Compared to the negative-control strain expressing lacZ, overexpression of all tet resistance genes had a pronounced effect on tetracycline and minocycline susceptibility, increasing MIC values by ≥32-fold and by 2-fold to >64-fold, respectively (Table 4). Overexpression of tet(K), tet(B), and tet(M) had no significant effect on the TP-271 MIC (values were within 2-fold of the control value); however, a 16-fold to 32-fold increase was observed in the presence of overexpression of tet(A) and tet(X). The highest MIC observed for TP-271 in the presence of an overexpressed tet gene was 4 µg/ml. As expected, the activity of the nontetracycline control, ceftriaxone, was not impacted by tet gene expression.

TABLE 4 .

Activity of TP-271 against E. coli expressing recombinant tetracycline resistance genes

Strain tet or lacZ gene expressed MIC (µg/ml)a
TP-271 MIN TET CRO
EC969 tet(M) 0.12 >32 128 0.12
EC970 tet(K) 0.25 1 128 0.06
EC1082 tet(A) 2 8 >128 0.12
EC1083 tet(B) 0.25 8 >128 0.06
EC1153 tet(X) 4 2 128 0.12
EC971 lacZ 0.12 0.5 4 0.12
a

MIN, minocycline; TET, tetracycline; CRO, ceftriaxone.

The effect of upregulated chromosomally encoded efflux pumps in S. aureus on TP-271 activity.

TP-271 was evaluated against previously described S. aureus clinical isolates with upregulated expression of norA (29, 30) and mepA (31, 32), genes encoding intrinsic efflux pumps conferring resistance to quinolones (NorA and MepA) and tigecycline (MepA). The MIC value of TP-271 for both norA-overexpressing mutant SA982 and the corresponding SA981 parental strain was 0.06 µg/ml; however, an 8-fold increase in the MIC was noted for TP-271 in mepA-overexpressing mutant SA984 (MIC = 0.12 µg/ml) versus the corresponding parental SA983 strain (MIC = 0.016 µg/ml) (Table 5). The MIC value for the tigecycline comparator was 4-fold higher in the norA mutant and 16-fold higher in the mepA mutant than in the corresponding parental strain.

TABLE 5 .

TP-271 activity against S. aureus in the presence of overexpressed NorA or MepA efflux pumps

Compound MIC (µg/ml)a
SA981 (wild type) SA982 (norA++) SA983 (wild type) SA984 (mepA++)
TP-271 0.06 0.06 0.016 0.12
Tigecycline 0.06 0.25 0.06 1
Ciprofloxacin 0.5 32 2 4
a

Double plus signs (++) indicate overexpression of gene.

Activity of TP-271 in murine respiratory infection models.

TP-271 administered either intravenously (i.v.) or orally (p.o.) reduced the bacterial burden in the lung, versus the control group results at the start of dosing, in murine pneumonia models with MRSA, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae.

Neutropenic mouse MRSA pneumonia model.

In a neutropenic lung infection model challenged with tetracycline-resistant tet(M) MRSA strain SA191, TP-271 dosed i.v. at 2 and 12 h postinfection at 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg of body weight produced mean log10 CFU reductions of 0.62 ± 0.55, 1.58 ± 0.42, and 1.84 ± 0.41, respectively, exceeding the response seen with linezolid administered at 10 mg/kg, which was static (0.10 ± 0.58 log10 CFU reduction; Fig. 2). TP-271 administered p.o. at 25 mg/kg gave static results (0.17 ± 0.64 log10 CFU increase), and 50 and 100 mg/kg produced mean log10 CFU reductions of 0.52 ± 0.44 and 0.91 ± 0.63, respectively. This compared favorably to the response seen with linezolid administered p.o. at 15 mg/kg, which was static (0.04 ± 0.65 log10 CFU increase), and with 30 and 60 mg/kg, which produced mean log10 CFU reductions of 0.97 ± 0.23 and 0.94 ± 0.5, respectively.

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

Activity of TP-271 administered i.v. and p.o. in a neutropenic murine MRSA tet(M) pneumonia model. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and horizontal lines indicate the means. (A) TP-271 IV (i.v. administration). Untreated controls at 0 and 24 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271, 1 mg/kg (1 mpk) (open triangles), 5 mg/kg (gray triangles), and 10 mg/kg (closed triangles); linezolid, 10 mg/kg (closed squares). (B) TP-271 PO (p.o. administration). Untreated controls at 0 and 24 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271, 12.5 mg/kg (open triangles), 25 mg/kg (light gray triangles), 50 mg/kg (dark gray triangles), and 100 mg/kg (closed triangles); linezolid, 10 mg/kg (open squares), 15 mg/kg (light gray squares), 30 mg/kg (dark gray squares), and 60 mg/kg (closed squares).

Neutropenic mouse S. pneumoniae pneumonia model.

In a neutropenic lung infection model challenged with tetracycline-resistant tet(M) S. pneumoniae strain SP160, TP-271 dosed 2 and 12 h postinfection at 1, 5, and 10 mg/kg i.v. produced mean log10 CFU reductions of 3.26 ± 0.53, 3.83 ± 0.50, and 4.51 ± 0.29, respectively (Fig. 3). In contrast, the effect seen with linezolid administered i.v. at 5 mg/kg was static (0.13 ± 0.08 mean log10 CFU increase). TP-271 administered p.o. at 0.3 mg/kg produced a 0.90 ± 0.58 mean log10 CFU increase; 3 mg/kg produced a static effect (0.68 ± 0.24 mean log10 CFU reduction). The 30 mg/kg dose produced a mean log10 CFU reduction of 1.97 ± 0.48, which was comparable to results seen with linezolid administered p.o. at 30 mg/kg, which produced a mean log10 CFU reduction of 1.99 ± 0.87.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Activity of TP-271 administered i.v. and p.o. in a neutropenic murine S. pneumoniae tet(M) pneumonia model. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and horizontal lines indicate the means. (A) TP-271 IV (i.v. administration). Untreated controls at 0 and 24 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271, 1 mg/kg (open triangles), 5 mg/kg (gray triangles), and 10 mg/kg (closed triangles); linezolid, 5 mg/kg (closed squares). (B) TP-271 PO (p.o. administration). Untreated controls at 0 and 24 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271, 0.3 mg/kg (open triangles), 3 mg/kg (gray triangles), and 30 mg/kg (closed triangles); linezolid, 30 mg/kg (closed squares).

Immunocompetent mouse S. pneumoniae pneumonia model.

In immunocompetent mice challenged intranasally with macrolide-susceptible S. pneumoniae strain SP514, TP-271 dosed 5, 24, and 36 h postinfection with 30 mg/kg TP-271 p.o. produced a 4.13 ± 0.81 mean log10 reduction in CFU, exceeding the 2.95 ± 0.63 mean log10 reduction produced by linezolid given p.o. at the same dose (Fig. 4). In this model, the effect of administration of 5 mg/kg of clarithromycin p.o. was static (0.48 ± 0.78 mean log10 CFU reduction).

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Activity of TP-271 administered p.o. in an immunocompetent murine S. pneumoniae pneumonia model. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and horizontal lines indicate the means. Untreated controls at 0 and 48 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271, 30 mg/kg (open triangles); linezolid, 30 mg/kg (inverted closed triangles); clarithromycin, 5 mg/kg (gray circles).

Immunocompetent rat H. influenzae pneumonia model.

In a rat lung infection model challenged with H. influenzae HI551, TP-271 dosed 100 mg/kg p.o. or 25 mg/kg i.v. at 5, 24, and 48 h postinfection produced 1.82 ± 0.98 and 4.92 ± 0.36 mean log10 reductions in CFU, respectively (Fig. 5). Azithromycin at 50 mg/kg p.o. produced a 6.30 ± 0.03 log10 CFU reduction.

FIG 5 .

FIG 5 

Activity of TP-271 administered i.v. and p.o. in an immunocompetent rat H. influenzae pneumonia model. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and horizontal lines indicate the means. Untreated controls at 0 and 72 h, relative to the start of treatment, closed circles; TP-271 p.o., 100 mg/kg (open triangles), TP-271 i.v., 25 mg/kg (closed triangles); azithromycin, 50 mg/kg (closed squares).

DISCUSSION

Recent FDA guidelines (23) indicate that new antibacterial drugs for CABP must have nonclinical data showing activity against the most commonly implicated pathogens, i.e., S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, S. aureus, and M. catarrhalis, and for moderate to serious CABP, coverage of L. pneumophila is critical for empirical use. TP-271 meets these criteria, demonstrating good in vitro and in vivo potency against key susceptible and drug-resistant causative pathogens for this indication. The activity of TP-271 was minimally affected, or unaffected, by tetracycline-specific, fluoroquinolone, or macrolide resistances. MIC90 values for TP-271 were 0.03 µg/ml for all streptococci, the most common CABP pathogens, regardless of resistance phenotype. TP-271 was also active against MSSA and MRSA (MIC90 = 0.12 to 0.25 µg/ml), including community-acquired MRSA expressing PVL toxin. Against H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis¸TP-271 MIC90 values were 0.12 and ≤0.016 µg/ml, respectively. Good activity was also demonstrated against M. pneumoniae, with all MICs being ≤0.008 μg/ml, including those against macrolide-resistant organisms. TP-271 was active against C. pneumoniae (MIC90 = 4 µg/ml) and L. pneumophila (MIC90 = 1 µg/ml) despite potential interference from assay conditions. TP-271 was efficacious when administered i.v. and p.o. versus MRSA, S. pneumoniae, and H. influenzae in rodent pneumonia models, demonstrating potential as both an i.v. treatment and an oral treatment for CABP. The spectrum of activity of TP-271, along with the results from the animal infection models of pneumonia, makes it a promising candidate for development as an antibiotic for treatment of moderate to severe CABP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Antibiotics.

Commercial-grade antibiotics were obtained from the USP (Rockville, MD), ChemPacific Corp. (Baltimore, MD), or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). TP-271 was synthesized at Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals as described previously (33).

In vitro Escherichia coli coupled transcription and translation (TnT) assay.

TP-271 and comparators were assayed for bacterial translation inhibition with a firefly luciferase readout, as described previously (22).

Susceptibility testing of aerobic pathogens.

All MIC assays were performed by broth microdilution at Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals, International Health Management Associates (IHMA), and Mount Sinai Hospital (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (34). Isolates were recent and demographically diverse and were obtained from Eurofins Medinet (Chantilly, VA), IHMA, or the Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network collection at Mount Sinai Hospital. For testing in the presence of pulmonary surfactant, MIC assays were performed with the addition of 5% beractant (Survanta; AbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, IL) and incubated at 37°C with agitation. Antibiotic resistance was determined per CLSI breakpoints (35).

Susceptibility testing of atypical pathogens.

The L. pneumophila human respiratory isolates used were collected from 1992 to 2010 and were identified by standard methods as previously described (36). Seventy L. pneumophila isolates from serogroups 1 to 6 were tested by CLSI agar dilution methodology (34) at M360 (Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada) using BYE with original Legionella growth supplement (Oxoid Canada, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) (per 100 ml of medium: buffer/potassium hydroxide [1.0 g], ferric pyrophosphate [0.025 g], l-cysteine HCl [0.04 g], and α-ketoglutarate [0.1 g]).

Low-passage-number clinical isolates of M. pneumoniae isolated between 1999 and 2012 were tested by broth microdilution at the University of Alabama, Birmingham (UAB), Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory using SP4 broth per CLSI methodology (37).

The 10 C. pneumoniae human isolates used in this study were obtained from the University of Washington (Seattle, WA), UAB, and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). Each C. pneumoniae isolate was propagated and screened for susceptibility at the Southern Research Institute (Birmingham, AL) using HEp-2 cells (ATCC) (38). HEp-2 cells were grown in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM; ATCC, Manassas, VA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals, Flowery Branch, GA) on poly-l-lysine coated coverslips in 12-well tissue culture-treated plates. A HEp-2 cell suspension (1 ml) was pipetted at ~2.0 × 105 cells/ml onto each coverslip and incubated at 35°C in 5% CO2 for 24 h to allow adherence. After incubation, the culture medium was removed and cells were rinsed with 1 ml HEPES-buffered sterile saline solution. Approximately 1.0 × 106 C. pneumoniae elementary bodies in sucrose/phosphate/glutamate buffer (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added per well for a multiplicity of infection of 10. Plates were centrifuged at 900 × g for 60 min at ambient temperature, and supernatants were aspirated from each well and replaced with 1 ml of EMEM containing 1 μg/ml cycloheximide with or without a test compound dilution. After incubation at 35°C in CO2 for 72 h, the medium was removed and 1 ml of 95% ethanol was added. After 10 min, coverslips were placed on a microscope slide and inclusion bodies were detected using fluorescein-conjugated anti-Chlamydia monoclonal antibody from a PathoDx Chlamydia confirmation kit (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA). The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of test compound resulting in a >50% reduction in the number of inclusions after 3 days of treatment. Controls were (i) noninfected cells, (ii) infected cells without drug, and (iii) infected cells treated with doxycycline and azithromycin.

Susceptibility testing against E. coli DH10B overexpressing recombinant tetracycline resistance genes.

Evaluation of TP-271 and comparators against laboratory E. coli strain DH10B overexpressing tetracycline resistance genes was performed as previously described (22).

Susceptibility testing against S. aureus strains overexpressing norA and mepA efflux pump genes.

Evaluation of TP-271 and comparators against S. aureus overexpressing chromosomally encoded multidrug resistance efflux pumps was performed as previously described (39).

Animal infection models.

All studies were performed at Vivisource Laboratories, Waltham, MA, with the exception of the neutropenic S. pneumoniae model using p.o. administration, which was performed at the University of North Texas Health Science Center. All procedures followed Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocols. Pathogen-free female mice, CD-1 or BALB/c, and male Sprague-Dawley rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories, Inc. (Wilmington, MA), and were acclimated for a minimum of 5 days prior to the start of the studies. The animals had free access to food and water throughout the study.

Preparation of inocula for lung infection models.

All medium was from BBL, Franklin Lakes, NJ. Bacteria were grown in 5% CO2 at 37°C overnight. S. aureus was cultivated on Trypticase soy agar (TSA), S. pneumoniae strains were grown on TSA with 5% sheep blood, and H. influenzae was grown on chocolate agar. The inoculum was prepared by suspending a portion of the overnight growth in sterile saline solution to achieve an optical density of 0.1 at 625 nm. The culture was subsequently diluted in brain heart infusion (BHI) medium to achieve each inoculum. For preparation of H. influenzae for intratracheal infections, 1% molten BHI agarose was added to the inocula and the 0.5% molten agarose bacterial suspension was maintained in a 42°C water bath throughout the infection procedure. All inoculation was done under conditions of light anesthesia (4.5% isoflurane with 1.5 liters/min O2).

Quantification of bacterial load in lung.

At the time of bacterial burden determination, animals were euthanized by CO2 inhalation, the lungs were aseptically removed, weighed, and homogenized in sterile saline solution, and the homogenate was serially diluted and plated on TSA (MRSA and S. pneumoniae) or chocolate agar (H. influenzae). CFU per gram of lung were calculated after overnight incubation of plates at 37°C in 5% CO2.

Neutropenic mouse lung infection model.

BALB/c mice (18 to 20 g, n = 5 to 6 per group) were rendered neutropenic through two consecutive intraperitoneal injections of cyclophosphamide of 150 and 100 mg/kg of body weight on days −4 and −1, respectively, and were inoculated intranasally on day 0 with 50 μl of bacterial inoculum. Mice received drug formulated in sterile 0.9% saline solution at 10 ml/kg via tail vein i.v. injection or via oral gavage in water at 2 and 12 h postinfection, except for linezolid, which was given only by oral gavage at 2 and 12 h postinfection. Bacterial burden in lung was determined at pretreatment and 24 h after initiation of treatment. The MIC values for TP-271 and linezolid against tetracycline-resistant tet(M) MRSA strain SA191 were 0.25 and 2 µg/ml, respectively. The MIC values for TP-271 and linezolid against tetracycline-resistant tet(M) S. pneumoniae strain SP160 were ≤0.016 and 1 µg/ml, respectively. Inocula were as follows (in CFU per mouse): for S. aureus SA191, 7.5 × 107; and for S. pneumoniae SP160, 7.0 × 106.

Immunocompetent S. pneumoniae mouse lung infection model.

CD-1 mice (18 to 20 g, n = 5 to 6 per group) were inoculated intranasally with 1.6 × 107 CFU of respiratory isolate S. pneumoniae SP514 at 50 μl per mouse. The MIC values for TP-271, linezolid, and clarithromycin were ≤0.008, 0.5, and ≤0.008 µg/ml, respectively. Mice were dosed p.o. with 30 mg/kg TP-271 or linezolid or with 5 mg/kg clarithromycin in a volume of 10 ml/kg at 5, 24, and 36 h postinfection. Bacterial burden in lung was determined at pretreatment and 48 h following initiation of treatment.

Immunocompetent H. influenzae rat lung infection model.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (175 to 200 g, n = 5 to 8 per group) were infected intratracheally with 6.5 × 107 CFU per rat of ampicillin-resistant respiratory isolate H. influenzae HI551 at 0.5 ml. The MIC values for TP-271 and azithromycin were ≤0.016 and 0.5 µg/ml, respectively. At 5, 24, and 48 h, rats were dosed with a volume of 5 ml/kg containing TP-271 p.o. at 100 mg/kg or i.v. at 25 mg/kg; azithromycin was dosed p.o. at 50 mg/kg in a volume of 10 ml/kg. Bacterial burden in lung was determined at pretreatment and at 72 h following initiation of treatment.

Pharmacodynamic analysis.

The mean log10 CFU count per gram of tissue obtained at the start of treatment group (T = 0 h) was subtracted from the log10 CFU count per gram of tissue obtained for each individual animal in the treatment groups to determine the change in log10 CFU per gram of tissue at the end of treatment. The mean change in log10 CFU per gram of tissue ± standard deviation was determined for the vehicle control, comparator(s), and TP-271 efficacy groups and graphed using GraphPad Prism version 4.03.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge the contributions from the Tetraphase Chemistry Department for the synthesis of TP-271 for these studies and appreciate the support of Anne Radcliff and Katie Edwards at CUBRC. Technical support from Donna M. Crabb for Mycoplasma pneumoniae MIC assays is gratefully acknowledged. Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals is also grateful to the late Donald Low for his support of the TP-271 program and the testing of TP-271 against isolates from the Canadian Bacterial Surveillance Network.

These studies were funded in part by NIAID Partnership grant 1R01AI093484-01 and NIAID contract HHSN272201100028C awarded to CUBRC and Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals.

Trudy Grossman, Corey Fyfe, William O’Brien, and Joyce Sutcliffe were employees of Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals at the time that this work was performed.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Whitney C; Infectious Diseases Society of America . 2003. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis 37:1405–1433. doi: 10.1086/380488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, Mutha SS, Sankey SS, Weissfeld LA, Kapoor WN. 1996. Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis. JAMA 275:134–141. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.2.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Angus DC, Marrie TJ, Obrosky DS, Clermont G, Dremsizov TT, Coley C, Fine MJ, Singer DE, Kapoor WN. 2002. Severe community-acquired pneumonia: use of intensive care services and evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:717–723. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2102084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators 2015. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 385:117–171. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61682-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.CDC 2013. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2013. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.File TM. 2009. The science of selecting antimicrobials for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). J Manag Care Pharm 15:S5–S11. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.s2.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG. 2007. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis 44:S27–S72. doi: 10.1086/511159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kollef MH, Shorr A, Tabak YP, Gupta V, Liu LZ, Johannes RS. 2005. Epidemiology and outcomes of health-care-associated pneumonia: results from a large US database of culture-positive pneumonia. Chest 128:3854–3862. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.6.3854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wunderink RG. 2013. How important is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia and what is best antimicrobial therapy? Infect Dis Clin North Am 27:177–188. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rubinstein E, Kollef MH, Nathwani D. 2008. Pneumonia caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 46:S378–S385. doi: 10.1086/533594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC, Lina G, Nimmo GR, Heffernan H, Liassine N, Bes M, Greenland T, Reverdy ME, Etienne J. 2003. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis 9:978–984. doi: 10.3201/eid0908.030089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS. 2007. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest 87:3–9. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3700501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chua K, Laurent F, Coombs G, Grayson ML, Howden BP. 2011. Antimicrobial resistance: not community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A clinician’s guide to community MRSA—its evolving antimicrobial resistance and implications for therapy. Clin Infect Dis 52:99–114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dalhoff A. 2012. Global fluoroquinolone resistance epidemiology and implications for clinical use. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2012:976273. doi: 10.1155/2012/976273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hoban DJ, Reinert RR, Bouchillon SK, Dowzicky MJ. 2015. Global in vitro activity of tigecycline and comparator agents: Tigecycline Evaluation and Surveillance Trial 2004–2013. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 14:27. doi: 10.1186/s12941-015-0085-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pfaller MA, Farrell DJ, Sader HS, Jones RN. 2012. AWARE Ceftaroline Surveillance Program (2008–2010): trends in resistance patterns among Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 55(Suppl 3):S187–S193. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nicolau D. 2002. Clinical and economic implications of antimicrobial resistance for the management of community-acquired respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:61–70. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waites KB, Lysynyansky I, Bébéar CM. 2014. Antibiotic susceptibility testing and resistance in mycoplasmas of humans and animals. In Browning G, Citti C (ed), Mollicutes: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Caister Academic Press, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zheng X, Lee S, Selvarangan R, Qin X, Tang YW, Stiles J, Hong T, Todd K, Ratliff AE, Crabb DM, Xiao L, Atkinson TP, Waites KB. 2015. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1470–1472. doi: 10.3201/eid2108.150273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brodersen DE, Clemons WM Jr, Carter AP, Morgan-Warren RJ, Wimberly BT, Ramakrishnan V. 2000. The structural basis for the action of the antibiotics tetracycline, pactamycin, and hygromycin B on the 30S ribosomal subunit. Cell 103:1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00216-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pioletti M, Schlünzen F, Harms J, Zarivach R, Glühmann M, Avila H, Bashan A, Bartels H, Auerbach T, Jacobi C, Hartsch T, Yonath A, Franceschi F. 2001. Crystal structures of complexes of the small ribosomal subunit with tetracycline, edeine and IF3. EMBO J 20:1829–1839. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.8.1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grossman TH, Starosta AL, Fyfe C, O’Brien W, Rothstein DM, Mikolajka A, Wilson DN, Sutcliffe JA. 2012. Target- and resistance-based mechanistic studies with TP-434, a novel fluorocycline antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2559–2564. doi: 10.1128/AAC.06187-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.FDA 2016. Guidance for industry: microbiological data for systemic antibacterial drug products—development, analysis, and presentation. Guidance August 2016; US Department of Health and Human Services. FDA CDER. FDA, Silver Spring, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silverman JA, Mortin LI, Vanpraagh AD, Li T, Alder J. 2005. Inhibition of daptomycin by pulmonary surfactant: in vitro modeling and clinical impact. J Infect Dis 191:2149–2152. doi: 10.1086/430352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Dubois J, Dubois M, Martel J, Grossman T, Sutcliffe J. 2010. In vitro activity of fluorocyclines against Legionella pneumophila. In Abstr 50th Intersci Conf Antimicrob Agents Chemother, Boston, MA, abstr F 1–2159. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roberts MC. 2005. Update on acquired tetracycline resistance genes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 245:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2005.02.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Speer BS, Bedzyk L, Salyers AA. 1991. Evidence that a novel tetracycline resistance gene found on two Bacteroides transposons encodes an NADP-requiring oxidoreductase. J Bacteriol 173:176–183. doi: 10.1128/jb.173.1.176-183.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang W, Moore IF, Koteva KP, Bareich DC, Hughes DW, Wright GD. 2004. TetX is a flavin-dependent monooxygenase conferring resistance to tetracycline antibiotics. J Biol Chem 279:52346–52352. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409573200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Yoshida H, Bogaki M, Nakamura S, Ubukata K, Konno M. 1990. Nucleotide sequence and characterization of the Staphylococcus aureus norA gene, which confers resistance to quinolones. J Bacteriol 172:6942–6949. doi: 10.1128/jb.172.12.6942-6949.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kaatz GW, Seo SM, Ruble CA. 1993. Efflux-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:1086–1094. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.5.1086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McAleese F, Petersen P, Ruzin A, Dunman PM, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Bradford PA. 2005. A novel MATE family efflux pump contributes to the reduced susceptibility of laboratory-derived Staphylococcus aureus mutants to tigecycline. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1865–1871. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1865-1871.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kaatz GW, Moudgal VV, Seo SM. 2002. Identification and characterization of a novel efflux-related multidrug resistance phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:833–838. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xiao XY, Hunt DK, Zhou J, Clark RB, Dunwoody N, Fyfe C, Grossman TH, O’Brien WJ, Plamondon L, Rönn M, Sun C, Zhang WY, Sutcliffe JA. 2012. Fluorocyclines. 1. 7-fluoro-9-pyrrolidinoacetamido-6-demethyl-6-deoxytetracycline: a potent, broad spectrum antibacterial agent. J Med Chem 55:597–605. doi: 10.1021/jm201465w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.CLSI 2015. Methods for dilution of antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 10th ed CLSI document M07-A10, vol 32, no 2. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, Pennsylvania. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.CLSI 2015. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 25th informational supplement. CLSI document m100-S25, vol 35 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Edelstein PH. 2007. Legionella, p 835–849. In Murray P, Baron E, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA (ed), Manual of clinical microbiology, 9th ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.CLSI 2011. Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing for human mycoplasmas; approved guideline. CLSI document M43-A, vol 31, no 19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Campbell LA, Kuo CC. 2009. Cultivation and laboratory maintenance of Chlamydia pneumoniae. Curr Protoc Microbiol 11:B:11B.1:11B.1.1–11B.1.2. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc11b01s12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sutcliffe JA, O’Brien W, Fyfe C, Grossman TH. 2013. Antibacterial activity of eravacycline (TP-434), a novel fluorocycline, against hospital and community pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:5548–5558. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01288-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES