Abstract
East Coast fever (ECF), caused by Theileria parva infection, is a frequently fatal disease of cattle in eastern, central and southern Africa, and an emerging disease in South Sudan. Immunization using the infection and treatment method (ITM) is increasingly being used for control in countries affected by ECF, but not yet in South Sudan. It has been reported that CD8+ T-cell lymphocytes specific for parasitized cells play a central role in the immunity induced by ITM and a number of T. parva antigens recognized by parasite-specific CD8+ T-cells have been identified. In this study we determined the sequence diversity among two of these antigens, Tp1 and Tp2, which are under evaluation as candidates for inclusion in a sub-unit vaccine. T. parva samples (n = 81) obtained from cattle in four geographical regions of South Sudan were studied for sequence polymorphism in partial sequences of the Tp1 and Tp2 genes. Eight positions (1.97%) in Tp1 and 78 positions (15.48%) in Tp2 were shown to be polymorphic, giving rise to four and 14 antigen variants in Tp1 and Tp2, respectively. The overall nucleotide diversity in the Tp1 and Tp2 genes was π = 1.65% and π = 4.76%, respectively. The parasites were sampled from regions approximately 300 km apart, but there was limited evidence for genetic differentiation between populations. Analyses of the sequences revealed limited numbers of amino acid polymorphisms both overall and in residues within the mapped CD8+ T-cell epitopes. Although novel epitopes were identified in the samples from South Sudan, a large number of the samples harboured several epitopes in both antigens that were similar to those in the T. parva Muguga reference stock, which is a key component in the widely used live vaccine cocktail.
Introduction
Ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are widespread in South Sudan [1]. They are a major threat to cattle and cause substantial mortality and reduced production [2]. East Coast fever (ECF, Theileria parva infection of cattle) is the most important TBD in South Sudan and is transmitted by the tick Rhipicephalus appendiculatus [3]. ECF was first reported in South Sudan in 1950 [4], with serological evidence by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) provided subsequently [5]. Molecular detection of tick-borne diseases, using the reverse line blotting procedure, showed the presence of T. parva, T. mutans, T. annulata, T. velifera, T. taurotragi, T. buffeli, Babesia bigemina and B. bovis in this region [6–7]. However, following the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) in January 2005, there has been extensive movement of people and their livestock within South Sudan, with concomitant reports of ECF spreading to new areas further north, that were previously ECF free, including outbreaks in 2012 in Warrap and Jonglei States of South Sudan (Marcellino, W unpublished data).
Management of ECF is primarily through tick control using acaricides. However, this approach is unsustainable in the medium term because of increasing acaricide resistance and food safety concerns [8]. Vaccination of cattle by infection with T. parva sporozoites and synchronous treatment with long-acting tetracycline results in long term immunity against the homologous parasite genotypes, but protection against challenge with heterologous parasite genotypes may be partial [9–10]. There are long-standing concerns among veterinary authorities that the introduction of parasite genetic material not previously occurring in a specific region through vaccination might result in the generation of novel more virulent genotypes through recombination or associated processes [10–11]. Although this is theoretically possible, there is no evidence that this happens in the field, after more than 30 years of the use of live vaccine in East Africa, particularly in Tanzania [10]. However, due to these concerns, there is an urgent need to characterize T. parva strains circulating in regions where live immunization has not yet been deployed, including South Sudan, to enable the comparison with the genotypes of live vaccine cocktail components.
The identification of several T. parva antigens and epitopes recognized by CD8+ T-cells from T. parva–immune cattle [12–15] provides an opportunity to address the nature and selective pressures driving diversity in antigens that induce T cell responses in cattle. Detailed study of immune responses to two of these antigens, Tp1 andTp2, demonstrated that they represent immunodominant target antigens recognised by CD8+ T-cell responses in cattle with specific class I MHC haplotypes [16]. In a recent study, partial sequences (432 bp) of the Tp1 gene and the full-length (525 bp) of the Tp2 gene were obtained from 82 T. parva isolates that were derived from laboratory maintained stocks, cattle, buffalo as well as from cattle subjected to challenge with buffalo-derived parasites [17]. Analysis of these sequences revealed extensive polymorphism in the two antigens, including the epitope-containing regions. Single nucleotide polymorphisms were detected at 51 positions (12%) in Tp1 and in 320 positions (61%) in Tp2, together with two short indels in Tp1. These resulted in 30 and 42 variants of the Tp1 and Tp2 antigens, respectively. The present study is designed to extend Pelle et al 2011 [17] using samples of T. parva isolated from farmers herds in four regions of South Sudan, where ECF is an emerging disease. Such information provides insights into the population genetic diversity of T. parva in South Sudan and baseline data on parasite variability which can be used to inform deployment of control strategies based on vaccination.
Materials and methods
Ethics statement
The study reported here was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the standard operating procedures of the ILRI IACUC (The ILRI’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee). We confirm that the studies that the samples were initially collected for received specific approval from ILRI IACUC.
Bovine blood samples
A total of 81 blood samples spotted on FTA™ cards (Whatman Biosciences) were collected from cattle in four regions in South Sudan. All samples were collected for previous studies, and the information on the sampling locations, date of collection and references are provided in S1 Table. Samples designated by the letters ‘Y’, ‘K’ and ‘J’ denote cattle parasites originating from Yei, Kajo keji and Juba, respectively (in Central Equatoria State (‘CES’), while ‘B’ represented those from Bor(in Jonglei State (‘JS’)) (S1 and S4 Tables; Fig 1).
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted using the PureLink™ Genomic DNA Mini extraction kit (Invitrogen®, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Nested PCR amplification of Tp1 and Tp2 genes
Nested PCR was used to amplify Tp1 and Tp2 genes from T. parva isolates. The external primers forTp1 and Tp2 genes were described by Pelle et al. 2011 [17]. The internal primers were designed based on the Muguga reference sequence of T. parva (GenBank accession numbers XM_757880.1 (Tp1) and XM_760490.1 (Tp2)) and synthesized by Bioneer, South Korea. The internal primers were designed to flank the regions of known CD8+ T-cell epitopes of Tp1 and Tp2 antigens. The primer sequences and their expected amplicon sizes are presented in S2 Table. Tp1 and Tp2 genes were amplified by PCR from 20 ng of genomic DNA in a 20 μl total reaction volume using AccuPower® PCR PreMix (Bioneer, South Korea), containing 1 U Top DNA polymerase, 250 μM of each dNTP, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 30 mM KCl and 1.5 mM MgCl2. The PCR cycling conditions for the external primers involved an initial step of 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 50°C for 45 s, 72°C for 1 min, and final extension at 72°C for 10 min. The cycling conditions for the internal (nested) PCR were similar to those used for the external primers, except that 1 μl of the primary PCR product was used as the template, with annealing temperatures of 55°C and 58°C for Tp1 and Tp2, respectively, and 30 cycles of amplification. The expected sizes of the nested PCR products are 405 bp and 504 bp for Tp1 and Tp2, respectively. Genomic DNA from schizont-infected lymphocyte cultures derived from the T. parva Muguga sporozoites stabilate 73, one of the components of the live ECF vaccine [18], was included as a positive control.
Purification of PCR products and DNA sequencing
PCR products were purified using the QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (QIAGEN, Germany), following the manufacturers’ protocol. Ten μl of the purified PCR products were sequenced directly using Tp1 and Tp2 internal primers on an ABI 3730 DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems) at the BecA-ILRI Hub, Nairobi, Kenya.
CLC DNA Workbench version 6.1 (www.clcbio.com) was used to assemble and manually edit the DNA sequences. Open reading frames present within the sequences generated from the amplified fragments were translated into amino acid sequences using the same program and converted into FASTA format. The online software, CLUSTALW version 1.83 (http://www.genome.jp/tools/clustalw/) [19] was used to align nucleotide and amino acid sequences.
Sequence analysis
Using the DISTMAT program (http://emboss.bioinformatics.nl/) [20], genetic distances (expressed as the number of nucleotide differences per 100 bases or per 100 amino acids, including length polymorphisms) were produced. These were then used to perform Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using the Excel plug-in ‘GenAlEx6.5’(http://biology.anu.Edu.au/GenAlEx) [21–22]. GenAlEx6.5 was also used for analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) to investigate the distribution of genetic variation within and among populations. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using MEGA version 5 (http://megasoftware.net/) [23]. The average nucleotide diversity (π), was calculated with DnaSP v5 (http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/) [24].
Parasite population dynamics were investigated using two approaches. The coalescent based estimator of selective neutrality, Fu’s FS [25] statistic, was calculated using Arlequin v. 3.5 (http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin35/) [26] and its significance was tested with 1000 coalescent simulations. Mismatch distribution patterns (the distribution of pairwise nucleotide differences between sequences) were used to investigate, and provide a visual representation of past parasite population demographic dynamics i.e. population size expansions or contractions [27–28] using Arlequin v. 3.5 [26].
To assess the similarity between T. parva haplotypes found in South Sudan with those of the Muguga strain, a median joining (MJ) network incorporating the South Sudanese Tp1 and Tp2 haplotypes and those derived from components of the T. parva Muguga (isolate 73) live ECF vaccine, respectively, was constructed using NETWORK 4.5 (http://fluxus-engineering.com/) [29].
Results
The level of genetic diversity in 81 samples of T. parva was assessed by determining the sequence polymorphism of two T. parva antigens, Tp1 and Tp2, that are targets of bovine CD8+ T-cell responses when expressed in the context of specific haplotypes.
Tp1 gene
The 405 bp region of Tp1 that was sequenced is located between nucleotides 537 to 941 of the reference Tp1 sequence (accession number XP_762973). This region encodes 134 amino acids; comprising 24.7% of the 543 amino acids of the Tp1 antigen. Nine alleles for this gene were identified in the 79 samples that were sequenced (S3 and S4 Tables). We were unable to sequence the Tp1 target region from two of the 81 samples. The alleles were recognized by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at eight nucleotide positions (S1 Fig). The nucleotide polymorphism in the region was π = 1.65%. Allele 1, which is present in the T. parva Muguga reference sequence, was represented in 53 of the 79 samples (67.1%).
The comparison between the protein sequences encoded by the nine alleles revealed four distinct antigen variants (Fig 2A, S3 Table), resulting from amino acid changes at three residues. Comparison of the T. parva Muguga CD8+T-cell epitope sequence (VGYPKVKEEML) located within the sequenced region of Tp1 [13]; revealed three epitope variants ending with ML, II and IL. This was due to nucleotide substitutions at positions 133 and 134. The majority of samples analyzed (54 out of 79; 68.4%) displayed the ‘-ML’ epitope sequence variant present in T. parva Muguga reference isolate (S4 Table). The next most common variant (-II) was observed in 14 samples (17.7%), derived from cattle at three sampling sites Bor, Yei and Juba. The single substitution variant (-IL) was observed in one sample (1.3%) derived from cattle in Yei. The other protein variant (-II) was observed in nine samples (11.4%), six derived from cattle in Kajo keji, two from Bor and one from Juba (Fig 2A and S4 Table).
Of the nine alleles identified inTp1 gene, two alleles (1 and 4) were reported previously [17], while seven (alleles 36 to 42) are reported here for the first time (GenBank accession numbers KJ566596 to KJ566602). With regard to the antigen variants, three (Var-1,-3 and -9) were reported previously [17], and one (Var-31) is reported here for the first time (Fig 2A and S4 Table).
Tp2 gene
The partial sequence of the Tp2 gene, encoding 168 amino acids, was obtained from 65 T. parva samples. We were unable to amplify good quality sequences from 16 of the 81 samples. The nucleotide polymorphism (π) observed in the sequenced region is 4.76%. Fifteen alleles were identified among the sequenced samples, with SNPs observed at 78 nucleotide positions (S2 Fig, S4 Table). These nucleotide variations resulted in 14 distinct antigen variants when the protein sequences encoded by the 15 alleles were compared (Fig 2B, S4 Table). Allele 1, which is present in the T. parva Muguga reference sequence, was observed in 43 out of the 65 samples (66.2%). The 65 Tp2 sequences revealed several variants for each epitope. These ranged from seven variants for epitope number one to three for epitope numbers two, three, four and five, while epitope six had five variants (Table 1).
Table 1. Tp2 CTL epitope variants obtained in this study.
Epitope variant | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Epitope 1(7 variants) | Epitope 2 (3 variants) | Epitope 3 (3 variants) | Epitope 4 (3 variants) | Epitope 5 (3 variants) | Epitope 6 (5 variants) |
SHEELKKLGML (1,5,44,48,49,50,51,52)a | DGFDRDALF (1,2,5,42,43,44,48,49,50,51,52) | KSSHGMGKVGK (1,2,5,42,43,44,46,48,49,50, 51,52) | FAQSLVCVL (1,2,5,42,43,44, 48,49,51,52) | QSLVCVLMK (1,2,5,42,43,44, 48,49,51,52) | KTSIPNPCKW(1, 2, 5, 42, 43, 44, 48, 49, 50) |
SHEELNILGML (42) | EGFDKEKLF(45,47) | KSSQSMGKVGK (45) | FAQSLMCVL (46,50) | QSLMCVLMK (46,50) | KPSIPNPCKW (52) |
SDEELNKLGML (2) | EGFDRETLF (46) | KSSKSMGKVGK (47) | FAQSIMCVL (45,47) | QSIMCVLKK (45,47) | KNDIPNPCKW (45) |
SYEELKKLGML (43) | KTDIPNPCKW (46,47) | ||||
SQEELKKMGML (45) | KTCFPNPCKW (51) | ||||
SEEELKKLGML (47) | |||||
THEELKKMGML (46) |
aNumbers in parentheses are the corresponding Tp2 gene alleles encoding that particular epitope (S4 Table)
Positions of polymorphic amino acid residues in each epitope variant are in bold underlined.
Among the 15 alleles identified in the Tp2 gene, three (alleles 1, 2 and 5) were reported previously [17], while the remaining 12 (alleles 44 to 55) are reported here for the first time (GenBank accession numbers KJ566603 to KJ566614). Likewise, from the 14 antigen variants identified, three (Var-1, -2 and -5) were reported previously [17], and 11 (Var-42 to -52) are reported here for the first time.
More alleles were observed in Tp2 than in Tp1 gene (S4 Table). This was due to the higher level of diversity of the Tp2 gene at the Yei and Kajo keji sampling sites in which there were 12 alleles derived from 16 sequences, compared to seven present in 49 Bor and Juba sequences. Alignment of sequences from the 65 samples of the Tp2 gene indicated that only 46 amino acid residues (27.4%) are variable, with the remainder 72.6% being conserved (Fig 2B). In contrast 97.7% of amino acid residues are conserved among the 79 Tp1 sequences (Fig 2A).
Phylogenetic analysis of Tp1 and Tp2 sequences from T. parva in South Sudan
The sequence diversity, observed in Tp1 and Tp2, was examined further by generating neighbour-joining trees for both loci that were rooted using the orthologous sequences of T. annulata (GenBank accession number TA17450 for Tp1 and TA19865 for Tp2). Allele 1 found in the reference Muguga isolate clustered together with the eight relatively similar Tp1 alleles as well as with the majority of the samples (Fig 3A). This cluster contained 54 out of the 79 samples studied (67.4%) and originated from the four geographic regions of South Sudan that were sampled Bor (36), Juba (9), Yei (7) and Kajo keji (2).
Phylogenetic analysis involving the 15 Tp2 alleles grouped the 65 samples into clusters, 1A and 1B (Fig 3B). Three samples K5, K6 and Y9 that encoded-single unique alleles (alleles 47, 49 and 53) each, did not fall into this cluster. Despite the higher nucleotide polymorphism observed in Kajo keji samples (π = 21.6%), most differences are attributable to variation between sequences originating from Juba and Yei (Fig 3B). Allele 1A was found in the reference Muguga isolate and in 43 samples from South Sudan. This cluster contained 43 out of 65 samples (66.2%) and was present in all four geographic regions of South Sudan, Bor (35), Juba (2), Yei (2) and Kajo keji (4).
The partitioning of genetic diversity in Tp1 and Tp2 was further analysed, with two related sets of input data, using AMOVA. In the first analysis, the full set of the Tp1 sequences (Bor = 41, Juba = 20, Kajo keji = 8 and Yei = 10) was tested. The result indicated that 16% of the variation among Tp1 sequences occurred within populations, while 84% of the variation was attributable to differences between populations. In the case of the second set of input data, where only unique alleles from each population (Bor = 4, Juba = 5, Kajo keji = 5 and Yei = 3) were used in the analysis, all the variation (100%) among Tp1 alleles occurred within populations. When the Tp2 locus was subjected to AMOVA, the result indicated that, 23% of the variation was within populations, and 77% was due to differences between populations. When only unique alleles from each population (Bor = 3, Juba = 4, Kajo keji = 7 and Yei = 5) were analysed, 95% of the variation among alleles in the Tp2 locus occurred within populations, while 5% of the variation was due to differences between populations.
The PCA plot illustrating the relationship between populations from four geographic regions of South Sudan and the Muguga strain is shown in Fig 4A and 4B. PCA reduces the number of dimensions in a dataset while retaining the features that contribute most to differentiating populations by generating several uncorrelated variables called principal components using matrix algebra. The first principal component accounts for the maximum level of variability in the data, with each successive component accounting for as much of the remaining variability as possible. The results indicated that most of the samples clustered with the T. parva Muguga genotype.
For Tp1 and Tp2, Fu’s FS value was negative and not significant (Tp1, FS = -1.249, P = 0.323; Tp2 FS = -0.753, P = 0.446), consistent with a population expansion. Mismatch distribution analysis for Tp1 and Tp2 genes, revealed a distribution pattern that is consistent with the one expected for expanding populations (S3A and S3B Fig) providing further support for spatial expansion of T. parva parasite population in South Sudan.
The Median-Joining network (MJ) of T. parva haplotypes from South Sudan is shown in Fig 5A and 5B. For Tp1, haplotype H1, represented by 54 samples including Muguga, is the commonest followed by haplotypes H3 (3 samples), H2 (4 samples) and H4 (3 samples). The remaining five haplotypes (H5, H6, H7, H8, and H9) are each represented by a single sample (Y7, J1, K2, K4 and J11) (see S3 and S4 Tables, and S1 Fig). The links between haplotype H4 and the others were well resolved (Fig 5A). Haplotype H4 was separated from H2, H3, H5, and H8 by a single mutation, from H6 and H7 by two mutations, while it was separated from H1 by three and from H9 by four mutations. No median vectors were present between the haplotypes.
With regard to Tp2, haplotype H1, represented by 44 samples including T. parva Muguga, is the most common, followed by haplotypes H3 (seven samples), and H5 and H4 (two samples each). The remaining 11 haplotypes are represented by a single sample (see S4 Table, S2 Fig). A total of eight median vectors were observed and these were present between haplotypes H1 and H15, H12, H6, H10, H14, H3 and H4, respectively and also between haplotypes H7 and H9 (Fig 5B). The median vectors may represent either un-sampled haplotypes, haplotypes never introduced into South Sudan, or haplotypes that were introduced into South Sudan but became extinct. A star like radiating pattern of haplotypes anchored by haplotypes H4 for Tp1 (Fig 5A) and H1 for Tp2 (Fig 5B) can be observed. This hints at a population expansion event from an ancestral group, which further supports the results of Fu’s FS statistic and the mismatch distribution patterns.
Discussion
The application of molecular approaches, including sequencing of T. parva CD8+ T-cell target antigens allows the analysis of parasite population genetics in areas where ECF is endemic [30]. Determination of suitable live parasite vaccination cocktails should ideally be based on the strain-specificity of immunity in a particular region. In the absence of ‘gold standard’ cross-protection studies that may be impractical and expensive to perform, genotyping candidate antigens provides an indicator of the level of genetic relationships between parasites [31–32], and may serve as a proxy for the likely outcome of vaccination.
Our analysis of the sequences of two antigen genes provided evidence of diversity based on amino acid substitutions, including among residues within CD8+ T-cell epitopes, mapped in the context of specific bovine haplotypes. The diversity, particularly for Tp2 may be an underestimate, due to the high level of variability in the gene making it difficult to design primers that capture all the variation.
For Tp1 and Tp2 genes, the Bor and Juba samples are grouped together into one cluster, suggesting close genetic similarity. On the other hand, Kajo keji and Yei samples displayed moderate sequence diversity in Tp1 and extensive sequence diversity in Tp2 as observed previously in Kenya [17], suggesting that the vast majority of antigenic variability occurs in parasites maintained in these two geographic regions (Kajo keji and Yei). However, it should be noted that samples originating from Bor were collected at a different time period, which may explain why they represented a small proportion of the variation. In South Sudan the diversity in the parasite populations appears to be limited, which may be due to the fact that the transmission intensity is low [28]. Indeed, Kivaria et al (2012) [33] observed that the tick number per calf in South Sudan was approximately five R. appendiculatus, suggesting a relatively low level challenge.
The parasites examined were sampled from four geographically distant sites (> 300 Km apart), and the data is consistent with the suggestion that T. parva was initially present in Yei and Kajo keji and has recently been introduced to Juba and Bor [3–34]. Samples derived from three of the four geographic regions (Juba, Kajo keji and Yei) showed no evidence of genetic differentiation from T. parva samples collected from Bor that are presumed to have been introduced recently to the area (after the CPA in 2005).
The population genetic structure and mating systems of parasitic protozoa exhibit a wide spectrum ranging from a clonal population structure [35] to panmixia (random mating) [36]. Genetic data from field samples indicate a clonal population structure likely representing an epidemic expansion of one T. parva genotype in South Sudan, superimposed on variant genotypes which may either result from several distinct cattle migrations into the region or possibly endemic parasite types.
In order to obtain information on the processes that could have caused the observed genetic variation, parasite population dynamics were inferred by analysing mismatch distribution patterns and calculation of Fu’s FS statistic for the T. parva population in South Sudan. The results together with the star-like phylogeny on the MJ network provided evidence suggesting that T. parva in South Sudan has undergone an expansion perhaps due most likely to a range extension of a founder population associated with the movement of cattle.
Given the relatively small number of samples analysed here and that only two antigen-encoding genes, both of which may be under selection, were analysed, our data may not be fully representative of T. parva genotypes in South Sudan. Additional molecular tools, such as minisatellites, microsatellites and genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms, could be used to refine the analysis of population genetic structure and diversity of the various parasite populations in South Sudan. Further genotyping of T. parva isolates using larger sample sizes and additional genetic markers [37–39] would provide a higher resolution of the genetic profile of T. parva genotypes in the region. However, the widespread presence of Tp1 and Tp2 epitope sequences, which are known to be present in the T. parva Muguga stock, in South Sudanese T. parva populations may justify a trial of the Muguga cocktail ITM vaccine in South Sudan. However, it should be emphasised that although the antigen gene sequences and epitopes appear to be conserved with those identified in T. parva Muguga, the outcome of vaccination may depend on class I MHC phenotypes of the cattle in South Sudan, which remains unknown.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to the Biosciences eastern and central Africa Hub at the International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI Hub) by the Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) through a partnership between Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the BecA-ILRI Hub; and by the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill &Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); and the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the Swedish International Development Agency (SIDA), which made this work possible. DAS was a recipient of an Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) Fellowship. This research was also supported by the International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden and the Organization of Islamic Conference Standing Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (COMSTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan, through a grant (IFS grant 3765–2) to DAS. This work was supported in part by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project ‘Molecular epidemiology network for promotion and support of delivery of live vaccines against Theileria parva and T. annulata infection in Eastern and Northern Africa’ (SE862/2-1).
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID) through a partnership between Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Biosciences eastern and central Africa Hub at the International Livestock Research Institute (BecA-ILRI Hub); and by the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA); the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF); and the Swedish Ministry of Foreign Affairs through the Swedish International Development Agency (Sida), which made this work possible. DAS was a recipient of an Africa Biosciences Challenge Fund (ABCF) Fellowship (hub.africabiosciences.org). International Foundation for Science, Stockholm, Sweden and the Organisation of Islamic Conference Standing Committee on Scientific and Technological Cooperation (COMSTECH), Islamabad, Pakistan, through a grant (IFS grant 3765-2) to DAS (http://ifs.se/). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) project ‘Molecular epidemiology network for promotion and support of delivery of live vaccines against Theileria parva and T. annulata infection in Eastern and Northern Africa’ (SE862/2-1) (http://theileriainafrica.weebly.com/).
References
- 1.Anonymous (1983) Tick and tick-borne disease control. The Sudan: studies on important tick-borne diseases of cattle. Final report, AG: CP/SUD/024/DEN, Rome.
- 2.Marcellino WL, Salih DA, Jull II, El Hussein AM (2011) Economic impact of East Coast fever in central equatorial state of south Sudan. Int Res J Agric Sci Soil Sci 1: 218–220. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Julla II (1994) Studies on the epidemiology of theileriosis in Equatorial Region of the Sudan with emphasis on East Coast fever. PhD thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan, p115.
- 4.Hoogstraal H (1956) African Ixodoidea. I. Ticks of the Sudan (with specialreference to Equatoria Province and with preliminary reviews of thegeneraBoophilus, Margaropus, and Hyalomma). Department of Navy, Bureau of medicine and surgery; Washington, D.C., U.S.A: p1101. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Morzaria SP, Tatchell RJ, Minor R, Pederson V, Julla II, Rahim A, et al. (1981) Preliminary studies on theepidemiology of theileriosis in Eastern Equatoria Province of theSudan In: Irvin AD, Cunningham MP, Young AS (eds) Advances inthe control of Theileriosis. Martinus Njihoff, The Hague, pp 83–85. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salih DA, El Hussein AM, Seitzer U, Ahmed JS (2007) Epidemiological studies on tick-borne diseases of cattle in Central Equatoria State, Southern Sudan. Parasitol Res 101: 1035–1044. 10.1007/s00436-007-0583-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Odongo DO, Sunter JD, Kiara HK, Skilton RA, Bishop RP (2010) A nested PCR assay exhibits enhanced sensitivity for detection of Theileriaparva infections in bovine blood samples from carrier animals. Parasitol Res 106: 357–365. 10.1007/s00436-009-1670-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.George JE, Pound JM, Davey RB (2004) Chemical control of ticks on cattle and resistance of these parasites to acaricides. Paraitology 129: S333–S366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Minjauw B (1998) Effect of different East Coast fever control strategies on disease incidence in traditionally managed Sanga cattle in Central Province of Zambia. Prev Vet Med 35: 101–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Di Giulio G, Lynen G, Morzaria S, Oura C, Bishop R (2009) Live immunization against East Coast fever-current status. Trends Parasitol 25: 85–92. 10.1016/j.pt.2008.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Deken R, Martin V, Saido A, Madder M, Brandt J, Geysen D (2007) An outbreak of East Coast fever on the Comoros: a consequence of the import of immunised cattle from Tanzania? Vet Parasitol 143: 245–253. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Taracha EL, Goddeeris BM, Morzaria SP, Morrison WI (1995) Parasite strain specificity of precursor cytotoxic T cells in individual animals correlates with cross-protection in cattle challenged with Theileriaparva. Infect Immun 63: 1258 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Graham SP, Pellé R, Honda Y, Mwangi DM, Tonukari NJ, Yamage M, et al. (2006) Theileriaparva candidate vaccine antigens recognized by immune bovine cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 3286–3291. 10.1073/pnas.0511273103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Graham SP, Pellé R, Yamage M, Mwangi DM, Honda Y, Mwakubambanya RS, et al. (2008) Characterization of the fine specificity of bovine CD8+ T-cell responses to defined antigens from the protozoan parasite Theileriaparva. Infect Immun 76: 685–694. 10.1128/IAI.01244-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Graham SP, Honda Y, Pellé R, Mwangi DM, Glew EJ, de Villiers EP, et al. (2007) A novel strategy for the identification of antigens that are recognised by bovine MHC class I restricted cytotoxic T cells in a protozoan infection using reverse vaccinology. Immunome Res 3: 2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.MacHugh ND, Connelley T, Graham SP, Pelle R, Formisano P, Taracha EL, et al. (2009) CD8+ T-cell responses to Theileriaparva are preferentially directed to a single dominant antigen: Implications for parasite strain-specific immunity. Eur J Immunol 39: 2459–2469. 10.1002/eji.200939227 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pelle R, Graham SP, Njahira MN, Osaso J, Saya RM, Odongo DO, et al. (2011) Two Theileriaparva CD8 T cell antigen genes are more variable in buffalo than cattle parasites, but differ in pattern of sequence diversity. PLoS One 6(4): e19015 10.1371/journal.pone.0019015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Radley DE, Brown CGD, Cunningham MP (1975) East Coast fever. 3. Chemoprophylactic immunisation of cattle using oxytetracycline and a combination of theilerial strains. Vet Parasitol 1: 51–60. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22: 4673–4680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16: 111–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peakall R, (2006) genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288–295. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics 28: 2537–2539. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S, (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fu Y (1997) Statistical Tests of Neutrality of Mutations Against Population Growth, Hitchhiking and Background Selection. Genetics 147: 915–925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Excoffier L, L H (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 564–567. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Slatkin M, Richard R (1991) Pairwise Comparisons of Mitochondrial. Genetics 129: 555–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Schneider S, Excoffier L (1999) Estimation of past demographic parameters from the distribution of pairwise differences when the mutation rates vary among sites: application to human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 152: 1079–1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A (1999) Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16: 37–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Geysen D, Bishop R, Skilton R, Dolan TT, Morzaria S (1999) Molecular epidemiology of Theileriaparva in the field. Trop Med Int Health 4: A21–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Geysen D, Berkvens D (2013) Lack of evidence for safe vaccination with the Muguga cocktail in Sudan. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bird CE, Karl SA, Smouse PE, Toonen RJ (2011) Detecting and measuring genetic differentiation. CrustIssues19 10: 39–63. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kivaria FM, Kapaga AM, Mbassa GK, Mtui PF, Wani RJ (2012) Epidemiological perspectives of ticks and tick-borne diseases in South Sudan: Cross-sectional survey results. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Malak K, Mpoke L, Banak J, Muriuki S, Skilton RA, Odongo DO, et al. (2012) Prevalence of livestock diseases and their impact on livelihoods in Central Equatoria State, Southern Sudan. Prev Vet Med 104: 216–223. 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tibayrenc M, Kjellberg F, Arnaud J, Oury B, Brenière SF, Dardé ML, et al. (1991) Are eukaryotic microorganisms clonal or sexual? A population genetics vantage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88: 5129–5133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Paul RE, Hackford I, Brockman A, Muller-Graf C, Price R, Luxemburger C, et al. (1998) Transmission intensity and Plasmodiumfalciparum diversity on the northwestern border of Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg 58: 195–203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oura C, Odongo D, Lubega G, Spooner P, Tait A, Bishop RP (2003) A panel of microsatellite and minisatellite markers for the characterisation of field isolates of Theileriaparva. Int J Parasitol 33: 1641–1653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oura CL, Asiimwe BB, Weir W, Lubega GW, Tait A (2005) Population genetic analysis and sub-structuring of Theileriaparva in Uganda. Mol Biochem Parasitol 140: 229–239. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Patel EH, Lubembe DM, Gachanja J, Mwaura S, Spooner P, Toye P (2011) Molecular characterization of live Theileriaparva sporozoite vaccine stabilates reveals extensive genotypic diversity. Vet Parasitol 179: 62–68. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.