Skip to main content
Genome Announcements logoLink to Genome Announcements
. 2017 Feb 23;5(8):e01693-16. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01693-16

Complete Genome Sequences of Six Copper-Resistant Xanthomonas Strains Causing Bacterial Spot of Solaneous Plants, Belonging to X. gardneri, X. euvesicatoria, and X. vesicatoria, Using Long-Read Technology

Damien Richard a,b,c, Claudine Boyer a, Pierre Lefeuvre a, Blanca I Canteros d, Shyam Beni-Madhu e, Perrine Portier f, Olivier Pruvost a,
PMCID: PMC5323636  PMID: 28232425

ABSTRACT

Xanthomonas vesicatoria, Xanthomonas euvesicatoria, and Xanthomonas gardneri cause bacterial spot disease. Copper has been applied since the 1920s as part of integrated management programs. The first copper-resistant strains were reported some decades later. Here, we fully sequenced six Xanthomonas strains pathogenic to tomato and/or pepper and having a copper-resistant phenotype.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacterial spot disease causes yield loss and impairs fruit quality in most tomato- and pepper-producing areas. The disease is caused by several distinct Xanthomonas species: X. vesicatoria, X. euvesicatoria, X. gardneri, and X. perforans, with X. perforans being recently reclassified as X. euvesicatoria (1). These phylogenetically distant species display similar symptoms and host range (2). Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum), and chili pepper (Capsicum frutescens) are the main natural host species. The large-scale spread of the pathogens occurs through contaminated seeds, requiring strict disease management strategies to be imposed. A research effort is being made on biocontrol strategies, such as bacteriophage use, because resistant cultivars are scarce and rapidly overcome, and bacterial resistance to antimicrobial compounds is often reported. For example, widely used on pepper since the 1920s in the United States (3), a failure of copper sprays to control bacterial spot disease was first observed in 1968 (4), and the first associated genetic determinant (i.e., a transmissible plasmid) was reported more than 20 years later (2, 5).

In order to obtain a better understanding of copper resistance determinants and their spread among xanthomonads, we sequenced six tomato and pepper pathogen strains displaying a copper-resistant phenotype: X. euvesicatoria LMG930 and LH3, X. vesicatoria LMG911 and LM159, and X. gardneri JS749-3 and ICMP7383.

The long-read PacBio RSII technology was used to fully sequence the six strains, using one single-molecule real-time (SMRT) cell for each strain. Assembly of the raw reads was then performed using a SMRT Analysis HGAP version 2.3 protocol, and circularization of the contigs was done using a combination of the Minimus assembler (6) and the SMRT Analysis resequencing version 1 protocol. Assembly of transcription activator-like genes was improved using a custom version of the method previously described (7).

We obtained six closed chromosomes with sizes ranging from 4,969,893 bp to 5,313,102 bp, along with two to four closed plasmids per strain (31,328 bp to 222,061 bp) and uncircularized contigs. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) scores with type strains were used to confirm species assignation (Table 1). The six strains possessed the previously described copper resistance gene system copLAB (8) carried on a conjugative plasmid. Interestingly, the plasmid was very well conserved among five strains (dating from 1955 to 2010), while the other (LMG930) had no similarities apart from the copper resistance gene cluster. On five strains, this plasmid also comprised the cusAB-smmD, czcABCD, and arsBHCR resistance gene cluster. LH3 solely lacked arsBHCR. Evaluation of the minimum inhibitory concentrations was achieved on casitone yeast extract glycerol (CYE) medium, as previously reported (9, 10): these were zinc chloride, 16 to 32 mg/liter; copper sulfate, 128 to 256 mg/liter; sodium arsenite, 16 mg/liter (LH3), 128 to 512 mg/liter (other strains); cadmium sulfate, 6.4 to 12.8 mg/liter; and cobalt chloride, 16 to 32 mg/liter.

TABLE 1 .

Characteristics of the six sequenced Xanthomonas strainsa

Strain Other no. Species Copper resistance location Country of isolation Yr of isolation Host Chromosome size (bp) G+C content (%) ANI score (%)b Accession no.
LMG930 X. euvesicatoria Plasmid United States 1969 Pepper 5,079,107 64.7 99.98 CP018463 to CP018467
LMG911 CFBP2537 X. vesicatoria Plasmid New Zealand 1955 Tomato 5,110,163 64.3 99.95 CP018725 to CP018727
LM159 Bv-5-4a (INTA) X. vesicatoria Plasmid Argentina 1987 Pepper 5,086,726 64.2 99.88 CP018468 to CP018471
LH3 Xv5 (FAREI), CFBP7993 X. euvesicatoriac Plasmid Mauritius 2010 Tomato 4,969,893 64.9 98.68 (99.98) CP018472 to CP018476
JS749-3 X. gardneri Plasmid Réunion 1997 Tomato 5,158,913 63.7 99.91 CP018728 to CP018730
ICMP7383 CFBP7999 X. gardneri Plasmid New Zealand 1980 Tomato 5,313,102 63.5 98.29 CP018731 to CP018734
a

LMG strains are from the Belgian Coordinated Collections of Microorganisms (BCCM/LMG), University of Ghent, Belgium. ICMP, International Collection of Microorganisms from Plants, Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand; INTA, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; FAREI, Food and Agricultural Research and Extension Institute; CFBP, Collection Française de Bactéries Associées aux Plantes.

b

ANI scores were calculated using type strains of each species: LMG27970 for X. euvesicatoria; ATCC 35937 for X. vesicatoria; and ATCC 19865 for X. gardneri. Value in parentheses is for the type strain of X. perforans (CFBP7293).

c

Synonym of X. perforans.

The very high similarity of the plasmids hosting the copper resistance adaptive trait among four species pathogenic to solaneous plants suggests pervasive events of horizontal gene transfer at the niche level.

Accession number(s).

The six closed genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank. The genome accession numbers are shown in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Géraldine Taghouti and Marion Le Saux (INRA) provided part of the data.

Footnotes

Citation Richard D, Boyer C, Lefeuvre P, Canteros BI, Beni-Madhu S, Portier P, Pruvost O. 2017. Complete genome sequences of six copper-resistant Xanthomonas strains causing bacterial spot of solaneous plants, belonging to X. gardneri, X. euvesicatoria, and X. vesicatoria, using long-read technology. Genome Announc 5:e01693-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01693-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Constantin EC, Cleenwerck I, Maes M, Baeyen S, Van Malderghem C, De Vos P, Cottyn B. 2016. Genetic characterization of strains named as Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. dieffenbachiae leads to a taxonomic revision of the X. axonopodis species complex. Plant Pathol 65:792–806. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Potnis N, Timilsina S, Strayer A, Shantharaj D, Barak JD, Paret ML, Vallad GE, Jones JB. 2015. Bacterial spot of tomato and pepper: diverse Xanthomonas species with a wide variety of virulence factors posing a worldwide challenge. Mol Plant Pathol 16:907–920. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Higgins BB. 1922. The bacterial spot of pepper. Phytopathology 12:501–516. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marco GM, Stall R. 1983. Control of bacterial spot of pepper initiated by strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria that differ in sensitivity to copper. Plant Dis 67:779–781. doi: 10.1094/PD-67-779. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stall RE, Loschke DC, Jones JB. 1986. Linkage of copper resistance and avirulence loci on a self-transmissible plasmid in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 76:240–243. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-76-240. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sommer DD, Delcher AL, Salzberg SL, Pop M. 2007. Minimus: a fast, lightweight genome assembler. BMC Bioinformatics 8:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Booher NJ, Carpenter SC, Sebra RP, Wang L, Salzberg SL, Leach JE, Bogdanove AJ. 2015. Single molecule real-time sequencing of Xanthomonas oryzae genomes reveals a dynamic structure and complex TAL (transcription activator-like) effector gene relationships. Microb Genom 1. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Behlau F, Canteros BI, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Graham JH. 2011. Molecular characterization of copper resistance genes from Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. citrumelonis. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4089–4096. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03043-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zevenhuizen LPTM, Dolfing J, Eshuis EJ, Scholten-Koerselman IJ. 1979. Inhibitory effects of copper on bacteria related to the free ion concentration. Microb Ecol 5:139–146. doi: 10.1007/BF02010505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pruvost O, Couteau A, Perrier X, Luisetti J. 1998. Phenotypic diversity of Xanthomonas sp. mangiferaeindicae. J Appl Microbiol 84:115–124. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00328.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genome Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES