Abstract
The synthesis, sorting, and characterization of monodisperse gold nanorods with dimensions around 10 nm in length and below 6 nm in diameter is reported. They display tunable plasmon resonance in the near infrared, a region where cellular absorption is reduced. A dual color photothermal microscope is developed to demonstrate that they are promising single molecule probes for bioimaging.
Keywords: cell imaging, density gradient ultrahigh centrifugation, gold nanorods, photothermal microscopy, plasmonic materials
Over the last decade, single‐molecule optical microscopy has become the gold‐standard approach to decipher complex molecular processes in cellular environments.1, 2, 3 Single‐molecule fluorescence microscopy has several advantages such as ease of application, high sensitivity, low invasiveness, and versatility due to the large number of available fluorescent probes. It bears, however, some drawbacks related to the poor photostability of organic dye molecules4 and auto‐fluorescent proteins5, 6, 7 and to the relatively large size of semiconductor nanoparticles in the context of live cell applications.4, 8, 9 The overall size of the functional biomarkers is a general issue for any imaging approach because of steric hindrance effects in confined cell regions. Small redshifted nanoemitters that are highly photostable are not currently available, while they would combine the best physical and optical penetration properties in biological tissues. Although single‐molecule absorption microscopy was early used to detect single‐molecules10 at cryogenic temperatures, it is only with the advent of photothermal microscopy11, 12 that practical applications of absorption microscopy were developed in single‐molecule research. Photothermal imaging (PhI) microscopy can indeed reach unprecedented sensitivities for detecting tiny absorbers with absorption cross‐section as small as a few 10−16 cm2.12, 13, 14
Several types of nanoobjects ranging from gold nanoparticles,15, 16, 17, 18, 19 carbon nanotubes20, 21 to quantum dots22 are detected at the single‐particle level leading to refined spectroscopic studies and ultrasensitive imaging applications. PhI displays extremely stable signals and is therefore appealing for biological applications. Furthermore photothermal microscopies are totally insensitive to nonabsorbing scatterers, even when large objects with strong refractive index contrasts are present within the surroundings of the imaged nanoparticles, as is often the case in biological samples.23 Several live cell applications of PhI involve the detection of small gold nanospheres in order to perform long‐term single molecule tracking.9, 24, 25 A limitation, however, arises due to background signal from endogenous cellular components, since these nanoparticles have to be excited at their plasmon resonance, which lies around 530 nm. Although one can also take advantage of this intrinsic absorption to achieve label‐free imaging,26 very small redshifted absorbing nanoparticles would represent better probes for PhI since near‐infrared is a region where the absorption of cell organelles is negligible. The use of gold nanorods as small probes absorbing in the near infra‐red is a promising strategy as they would combine good subcellular accessibility,9 low contribution from intrinsic cellular signals, and perfect photostability.
Gold nanorods are elongated nanoparticles, which display additional redshifted plasmon resonance as compared to their spherical counterparts.27 More precisely, transverse or longitudinal plasmon resonances result from the electron cloud oscillations excited by light polarized along their short‐axis (diameter) or long‐axis (length), respectively. Interestingly, the short‐axis plasmon resonance is basically independent of nanorods dimensions, while the long‐axis plasmon resonance can be tuned over a wide spectral range (from 620 to 1100 nm) based on their aspect ratio. Although large diameter nanorods (>8 nm) have been extensively used in different biological applications, such as bioimaging, delivery, sensing and therapy,18, 28, 29 the synthesis of nanorods with smaller diameter is more delicate and is more recent.30 Here, we report the synthesis, sorting, and characterization of monodisperse gold nanorods. These nanorods display tunable redshifted plasmon resonance as compared to their spherical counterparts. A dual color PhI microscope was developed to image them down to the single nanorod level and to demonstrate that nanorods are promising basic building blocks for the realization of cellular imaging biomarkers in the near infrared.
Nanorods were synthesized using a modified pH‐prompted seedless protocol (see the Experimental Section).30 The as‐prepared solution was first characterized using UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy from 400 to 1000 nm (Figure 1A). The absorption spectrum shows the characteristic splitting of the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) into two modes in case of gold nanorods (transverse at 516 nm and longitudinal ≈680 nm).31, 32, 33 Nanorod morphologies were then characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). All obtained nanorods had lengths smaller than 50 nm and diameters smaller than 7 nm (Figure 1B). More precisely, the distributions of nanorod lengths, diameters, and aspect ratios were constructed (Figure 1C–E) revealing that the as‐prepared solution was polydisperse in length, and rather monodisperse in diameter (6 ± 1 nm).
In order to improve nanorods monodispersity with tunable longitudinal plasmon resonance, we performed length sorting by density gradient ultracentrifugation34, 35 (see the Experimental Section). Upon centrifugation of the initial solution, distinct colored bands were visible (Figure 2A). Different fractions were collected and analyzed. Figure 2B displays UV/Vis absorption spectra of the first six collected fractions corresponding to the shortest nanorods. A manifold of narrower longitudinal SPR peaks is found as compared to the parent solution, while the transverse SPR peaks are almost identical. This indicates that efficient sorting based on nanorod lengths was obtained which results in monodisperse nanorods solutions with tunable plasmon resonance peaks. In the following, we concentrated on the solutions containing the smallest nanorods. Figure 2C,D shows TEM images of fractions with peak SPR at 618 and 642 nm respectively (image of a fraction containing longer nanorods is shown in Figure S1, Supporting Information). From such images we constructed the histograms of nanorod lengths and aspect ratios (Figure 2E–H). We obtained average lengths of 10 ± 1 nm (Figure 2E) and 13 ± 1 (Figure 2G) and aspect ratios of 1.8 ± 0.7 and 2.2 ± 0.7 (Figure 2F,H) respectively. The latest are consistent with position of the SPR peaks measured in Figure 2B.
We next characterized by PhI microscopy the nanorod sorted samples at the single‐particle level. PhI microscopy is indeed a sensitive imaging modality, which enables detection of nanometer‐sized objects solely based on their absorption. It involves the detection of refractive index variations that are induced by photothermal effect in the local environment of an absorbing nanoparticle.12, 36, 37, 38 Gold nanoparticles of a few nanometers are efficiently detected by this imaging modality, thanks to their fast relaxation times (ps range) and large absorption sections around their plasmon resonance. In order to excite nanorods either at their transverse or at their longitudinal plasmon resonances, a PhI microscope was built with two‐color excitation beams and a probe beam in the near infrared. The setup uses a low amplitude noise single frequency laser diode at 785 nm acting as probe beam (Innovative Photonic Solutions, TO‐56) and a 640 nm laser (Coherent OBIS‐FP) to excite nanorods at their longitudinal resonance or a 532 nm laser (Coherent Sapphire) to excite the nanorods at their transverse resonance (Figure 3). The intensities of the absorption beams were modulated at 450 kHz. The three beams were overlaid and focused onto the sample using a high NA objective (60×, NA = 1.49). Absorption beams were circularly polarized to ensure that nanorods are equally excited regardless of their orientation in the sample plane. Upon light absorption by a nanorod, temperature elevation induces time‐modulated variations of the refraction index in its close environment. The interaction of the probe beam with this index profile produces a scattered field with sidebands at the modulation frequency. The scattered field was then detected through its beat note with the probe field transmitted through the sample, which plays the role of a local oscillator and is extracted by lock‐in detection. Samples were mounted on a piezo‐scanner stage that allowed scanning the sample to acquire 2D images of nanorods. All data were acquired with integration times of 5 ms per pixel using a resolution of 100 nm per pixel. The setup also included white light transillumination and a CCD camera for bright‐field imaging of the biological samples.
Samples were first prepared by spin coating a mixture of (1:1 ratio) cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) stabilized nanorods and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA, 1.5%) on the surface of plasma cleaned glass slides. A drop of silicon oil was then added on the sample to ensure homogeneous heat diffusion. PhI images of nanorod fraction with a SPR peak at 642 nm were acquired using laser excitation at 640 nm (Figure 3D) and 532 nm (Figure 3E) with the same intensities at the imaging plane. One to one correlation is found in the two images indicating that identical objects are detected at the two excitations wavelengths. The signal intensities originating from ≈100 single nanorods excited at the two wavelengths were compared as shown in the histograms of Figure 3B,C. Several observations indicate that that single nanorods are detected at the two wavelengths. First, both distributions are narrow which also indicates that the dispersions of nanorod dimensions (both diameter and lengths) are very small within such length‐sorted fractions. Second, signal dispersion at 640 nm excitation also includes a tail toward the small signals attributed to a contribution from the out‐of polarization‐plane orientation of the rods. Indeed, for individual nanorods, absorption at 532 nm under circularly polarized excitation is weakly dependent on nanorod orientations39 since the transverse mode is always excited (Figure 3E), while absorption at 640 nm circularly polarized excitation is dependent on nanorod orientation since the longitudinal mode of nanorods with long axis normal to the polarization plane are not excited. To further support that single nanorods are detected in Figure 3D,E, we also collected images with a 640 nm excitation beam having four different linear polarization orientations. As expected from single rod detection PhI signals strongly dependent on the beam polarization Figure 3F–I. Noteworthy, nanorods oriented perpendicularly to the polarization axis display no PhI signal (see examples shown by arrowheads on Figure 3F–I.
We also note that a threefold higher intensity is observed under 640 nm excitation compared to 532 nm excitation at the peak of the histograms. This was expected for nanorods where the longitudinal SPR is more intense than the transverse one. Noteworthy in ensemble spectra presented in Figure 2B, the longitudinal SPR absorption peak is less than three times the transverse one due to orientation averaging of nanorods in solutions. PhI images and corresponding intensity histograms of other fractions are given in the Supporting Information (Figure S2). All of these fractions show similar trend in their intensity histograms, confirming that the synthesis protocol and density gradient ultrahigh‐centrifugation (DGU) sorting lead to narrow‐sized dispersion of nanorod solutions.
For bioimaging applications requiring very small nanolabels to access restricted cellular areas or complex tissue organizations, the signal to cellular background ratio at which small nanolabels can be detected is commonly the limiting factor. The smaller the nanolabels, the more difficult is the task due to the increasing weakness of detectable signal originating from the labels. In the case of PhI, intrinsic signal due to residual absorption of green light by cell mitochondria leads to background signals that can reach PhI signals of 5 nm gold nanoparticles excited at their plasmon resonance, i.e., around 532 nm. Nanorods which we can detect with high signal to noise ratio at 640 nm while maintaining a small size should thus represent a promising strategy in the context of cellular imaging with photothermal microscopy. In the following, we imaged nanorods in cellular environments. Fixed COS‐7 cells were chosen because these cells were previously shown to display intense intrinsic PhI signals originating from mitochondrial light absorption. After fixation COS‐7 cells were incubated with 5 × 10–9 m solution of nanorods in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 3% bovine serum albumin followed by extensive rinsing steps to remove nonimmobilized nanorods. Figure 4 displays white light images of the cells and the corresponding PhI images recorded using 532 and 640 nm excitation. According to Figure 3, punctual signals originating from individual immobile nanorods can be identified on the cells in the two images. Importantly cellular (mitochondrial) structures are clearly visible under 532 nm excitation (Figure S3, Supporting Information), which complicate the identification of nanorods around the mitochondria (arrow) at this excitation wavelength. By contrast, background signals originating from mitochondria are notably reduced under 640 nm excitation (Figure S4, Supporting Information). In addition, individual nanorods display notably higher PhI signals 640 nm excitation as compared to 532 nm excitation, facilitating their detection in cellular environments. The combination of these two effects thus participated in a clear enhancement of signal to cellular background ratio for the detection of nanorods in cells.
In conclusion, we developed a novel strategy for photothermal imaging based on gold nanorods, which presents strong optical absorption tunable from the red to the near IR. For biological applications, the use of these nanorods minimizes background signal from the cell organelles. We anticipate that they will constitute the next generation photothermal probe to study complex molecular dynamics in biological systems owing to their small size, tunable NIR‐absorption, absolute photostability, and chemical suitability for surface functionalization and bioconjugation.
Experimental Section
Nanorod Synthesis: Briefly, HAuCl4.3H2O (90 mL, 1 × 10–3 m) was added to 270 mL cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB; 0.2 m) followed by AgNO3 (9 mL, 4 × 10–3 m). The solution was gently shaken. HCl (405 µL, 37%) was then added to adjust the pH to ≈1. During this step, the color of the solution evolved from dark yellow to orange. Subsequently, 1260 µL of L‐ascorbic acid (AA; 78.8 × 10–3 m) was injected and gently shaken until colorless. Immediately, ice‐cold NaBH4 (540 µL, 10 × 10–3 m) was slowly added and the solution was kept overnight at constant temperature (≈30 °C). Appearance of dark blue color indicated the formation of nanorods. Excess CTAB was removed by centrifuging the parent solution at 20 k rpm for 1.5 h. The pellet was collected and redispersed in 10 × 10–3 m CTAB (4 mL) solution.
TEM Imaging: Monolayers of positively charged nanorods (due to CTAB encapsulating layer) were deposited and dried under ambient conditions on carbon‐coated Cu grids (200 mesh) that were negatively charged using a glow discharge technique (K950X Turbo evaporator with a 350X glow discharge head; Emitech, France).
Nanorods Length Sorting by DGU: The density‐gradient consisted of four layers of decreasing concentration of ethylene glycol from bottom to top (volume ratios: 80%, 70%, 60%, 50%) in 10 × 10–3 m CTAB, cooled at 4 °C before use. A 4 mL volume of nanorod solution was dropcasted on the top of cooled density gradient tube and centrifuged at a speed of 10 k rpm for 3.5 h at 15 °C (Beckman Coulter ultrahigh centrifuge).
Cell Culture and Fixation: COS7 cells were cultured plated on #1 glass slides up to 60% confluence in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with streptomycin (100 µg mL–1), penicillin (100 U mL–1), and 10% bovine serum in a humidified atmosphere (95%) at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. Cells were used for 12–14 passages and were transferred every 4 d. Before imaging, the cells were fixed in methanol at −30 °C, washed with PBS and stored in PBS at 4 °C until incubated with nanorods.
Supporting information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by CNRS, Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐14‐CE09‐0018‐01), Conseil Régional d'Aquitaine, the France‐BioImaging National Infrastructure (ANR‐10‐INBS‐04‐01) and IdEx Bordeaux (ANR‐10‐IDEX‐03‐02, LAPHIA) and SIRIC BRIO. E.S.S. acknowledges Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (655890 funding).
Shibu E. S., Varkentina N., Cognet L., Lounis B., Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600280.
References
- 1. Kusumi A., Tsunoyama T. A., Hirosawa K. M., Kasai R. S., Fujiwara T. K., Nat. Chem. Biol. 2014, 10, 524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gahlmann A., Moerner W. E., Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Cognet L., Leduc C., Lounis B., Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2014, 20, 78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Groc L., Lafourcade M., Heine M., Renner M., Racine V., Sibarita J. B., Lounis B., Choquet D., Cognet L., J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 12433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Harms G. S., Cognet L., Lommerse P. H. M., Blab G. A., Schmidt T., Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 2396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cognet L., Tardin C., Négrier M.‐L. M., Breillat C., Coussen F., Choquet D., Lounis B., J. Biomed. Opt. 2008, 13, 031216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Manley S., Gillette J. M., Patterson G. H., Shroff H., Hess H. F., Betzig E., Lippincott‐Schwartz J., Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Michalet X., Science 2005, 307, 538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Leduc C., Si S., Gautier J., Soto‐Ribeiro M., Wehrle‐Haller B., Gautreau A., Giannone G., Cognet L., Lounis B., Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Moerner W. E., Kador L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 2535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Boyer D., Tamarat P., Maali A., Lounis B., Orrit M., Science 2002, 297, 1160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Berciaud S., Cognet L., Blab G., Lounis B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 257402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gaiduk A., Yorulmaz M., Ruijgrok P. V., Orrit M., Science 2010, 330, 353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Tardin C., Cognet L., Bats C., Lounis B., Choquet D., EMBO Journal 2003, 22, 4656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Berciaud S., Cognet L., Tamarat P., Lounis B., Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Selmke M., Braun M., Cichos F., ACS Nano 2012, 6, 2741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Chang W. S., Ha J. W., Slaughter L. S., Link S., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 2781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zijlstra P., Paulo P. M. R., Orrit M., Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Olson J., Dominguez‐Medina S., Hoggard A., Wang L.‐Y., Chang W.‐S., Link S., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 44, 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Berciaud S., Cognet L., Poulin P., Weisman R. B., Lounis B., Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Gao Z., Oudjedi L., Faes R., Moroté F., Jaillet C., Poulin P., Lounis B., Cognet L., Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 17093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Berciaud S., Cognet L., Lounis B., Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 2160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cognet L., Tardin C., Boyer D., Choquet D., Tamarat P., Lounis B., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 11350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Lasne D., Blab G. A., Berciaud S., Heine M., Groc L., Choquet D., Cognet L., Lounis B., Biophys. J. 2006, 91, 4598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Duchesne L., Octeau V., Bearon R. N., Beckett A., Prior I. A., Lounis B., Fernig D. G., PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Lasne D., Blab G. A., De Giorgi F., Ichas F., Lounis B., Cognet L., Opt. Express 2007, 15, 14184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kreibig U., Vollmer M., Optical Properties of Metal Clusters, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Heidelberg, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Beuwer M. A., Prins M. W. J., Zijlstra P., Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Huang X., Neretina S., El‐Sayed M. A., Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ali M. R. K., Snyder B., El‐Sayed M. A., Langmuir 2012, 28, 9807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jana N. R., Gearheart L., Murphy C. J., Adv. Mater. 2001, 13, 1389. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Nikoobakht B., El‐Sayed M. A., Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ye X., Zheng C., Chen J., Gao Y., Murray C. B., Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Shin Y. J., Ringe E., Personick M. L., Cardinal M. F., Mirkin C. A., Marks L. D., Van Duyne R. P., Hersam M. C., Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Akbulut O., Mace C. R., Martinez R. V., Kumar A. A., Nie Z., Patton M. R., Whitesides G. M., Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Berciaud S., Lasne D., Blab G., Cognet L., Lounis B., Phys. Rev. B 2006, 73, 045424. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Selmke M., Braun M., Cichos F., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2012, 29, 2237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Selmke M., Cichos F., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 103901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Khlebtsov B. N., Khlebtsov N. G., J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 11516. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.