Oxidative stress and DNA damage have been increasingly re- cognized to coexist in the setting of coronary artery disease (CAD). DNA damage is present in all cells within the atherosclerotic plaque, and there is increasing evidence that human atherosclerosis is associated with damage to DNA of both circulating cells and cells of the vessel wall. DNA damage usually includes DNA strand breaks, mutations of single bases, modified bases (including oxidation), or DNA adducts. Many of the risk factors associated with atherogenesis, such as smoking and diabetes mellitus, could directly induce DNA damage (1).
Inflammation plays a pivotal role in atherogenesis. The response is continuously mediated by monocyte-derived macrophages and specific subtypes of T lymphocytes at every stage of the disease. Granulocytes are rarely implicated because they are scarce in atherosclerotic lesions during any phase of atherogene- sis (2). The action of different subsets of macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions is subsequently regulated by cytokines released by T cells. The monoclonal origin of cells from human atherosclerotic plaques is the triggering and the substantiating event for the association of DNA damage with the development of cardiovascular pathologies in the general population (3).
In addition to traditional CAD risk factors, oxidative stress has been regarded as one of the most important contributors to the prog- ression of atherosclerosis. Oxidative stress could also constitute the major causative mechanism for DNA damage in CAD (4). Reactive oxygen species include the superoxide anion, hydrogen pero- xide, hydroxyl radical, peroxynitrite, and lipid peroxides. Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide are normally not reactive to DNA, but they can be converted via the Fenton reaction to the hydroxyl radical, which is extremely reactive. The hydroxyl radical can induce a vast array of damage to both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (1, 5). Apart from oxidative stress, inflammation is another major determinant of DNA damage along with ischemia reperfusion.
Kadıoğlu et al. (6 in this issue of AJC entitled “The role of Oxidative DNA damage, GSTM1, GSTT1 and hOGG1 gene polymorphisms in coronary artery disease risk.”) provided evidence of significantly increased DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of CAD patients compared with healthy subjects, which was in agreement with previous studies (7, 8). However, they showed that DNA damage was not the result of augmented oxidative stress in those patients leaving inflammation as the most probable cause.
In atherosclerotic plaques, there is evidence of activation of DNA repair mechanisms along with signs of DNA damage. Genome lesions are eliminated with DNA strand break repair, base excision repair, and mismatch repair, whereas patients with specific polymorphisms in genes responsible for DNA repair have been found to be more susceptible to CAD (9, 10). The genotype analysis by Kadıoğlu et al. (6) revealed no clear association between the studied hOGG1 gene polymorphism and CAD. Nevertheless, the dual heterogeneity of risk factors and of the CAD patients should be noted. Therefore, further work is needed in delineating the relationship between DNA repair gene polymorphisms and CAD.
References
- 1.Mahmoudi M, Mercer J, Bennett M. DNA damage and repair in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2006;71:259–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ross R. Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory disease. Am Heart J. 1999;138:S419–20. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70266-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaya Y, Cebi A, Söylemez N, Demir H, Alp HH, Bakan E. Correlations between oxidative DNA damage, oxidative stress and coenzyme Q10 in patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Med Sci. 2012;9:621–6. doi: 10.7150/ijms.4768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Demirbağ R, Yılmaz R, Gür M, Koçyiğit A, Çelik H, Güzel S, et al. Lymphocyte DNA damage in patients with acute coronary syndrome and its relationship with severity of acute coronary syndrome. Mutat Res. 2005;578:298–307. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Michalik V, Spotheim Maurizot M, Charlier M. Calculation of hydroxyl radical attack on different forms of DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1995;13:565–75. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1995.10508867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kadıoğlu E, Taçoy G, Özçağlı E, Okyay K, Akboğa MK, Çengel A, et al. The role of Oxidative DNA damage, GSTM1, GSTT1 and hOGG1 gene polymorphisms in coronary artery disease risk. Anatol J Cardiol. 2016;16:931–8. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.6697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Botto N, Rizza A, Colombo MG, Mazzone AM, Manfredi S, Masetti S, et al. Evidence for DNA damage in patients with coronary artery disease. Mutat Res. 2001;493:23–30. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(01)00162-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bhat MA, Mahajan N, Gandhi G. DNA and chromosomal damage in coronary artery disease patients. EXCLI J. 2013;12:872–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang CL, Lin TH, Lin HY, Sheu SH, Yu ML, Hsiao PJ, et al. The 8-oxoguanine glycosylase I (hOGG1) Ser326Cys variant affects the susceptibility to multi-vessel disease in Taiwan coronary artery disease patients. Thromb Res. 2010;126:319–23. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gökkuşu C, Çakmakoğlu B, Daşdemir S, Tulubaş F, Elitok A, Tamer S, et al. Association between genetic variants of DNA repair genes and coronary artery disease. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17:307–13. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2012.0383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]