Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1963 Feb 1;67A(1):27–30. doi: 10.6028/jres.067A.004

Analysis of Two Infrared Bands of CH2D2*

Wm Bruce Olson, Harry C Allen Jr, Earle K Plyler
PMCID: PMC5324955  PMID: 31580612

Abstract

Two infrared absorption bands of CH2D2 have been analyzed in the semirigid rotor approximation. These are the A-type band at 2671.67 cm−1 and the C-type band at 4425.61 cm−1. The A-type band has previously been assigned as v3+v9, and the C-type band is tentatively assigned as v3+v6 The upper state of the A-type band is perturbed presumably by the close lying level 2v5. This interaction has not been investigated. The following values were found for the rotational constants of the ground vibrational state: A0=4.303 cm−1, B0= 3.504 cm−1, C0= 3.049 cm−1.

1. Introduction

The rotational-vibrational spectra of all the deuterated species of methane except CH2D2 have been well investigated [1].1

Methane and CD4 are spherical tops while CH3D and CD3H are symmetric rotors; on the other hand CH2D2 is an asymmetric rotor. It seemed of interest to determine the rotational constants of CH2D2 in order to have a set of constants for each of the species. Fortunately, high resolution spectra could be obtained for both an A-type and a C-type band for this molecule. As recently discussed [2], this is sufficient data to enable a good determination of the ground state constants using the complementary ΔF2 values obtained from the two bands. These two bands have been analyzed in the semirigid approximation to yield good values of the ground state constants. Unfortunately a perturbation in the excited state of the A-type band introduces an uncertainty in the effective constants for this band that is larger than can be justified for the precision of the data. Only transitions involving levels with low values of the rotational quantum numbers have been used in the analysis in order to minimize the effect of centrifugal distortion.

2. Experimental Procedure

The spectra were recorded with the grating instrument of the Infrared Spectroscopy Section [3] using a 10,000 lines/in. grating with a ruled area of about 6×8 in. A cooled PbS photoconductive cell was used as the detector.

Both the A- and C-type bands were recorded using a multiple reflection cell with a total path length of 6 m, filled with CH2D2 to a pressure of 2 cm of Hg. The C-type band was observed in the second order of the grating and the A-type band in the first. The CH2D2 obtained from Merck & Co., Ltd., had a stated minimum purity of 98%.

The wavelengths of the lines were measured using higher order infrared emission lines of the rare gases as standards, and interpolating between them through the use of the fringes of a Fabry-Perot interferometer as previously described [4].

3. Theory

Preliminary to the actual analysis of the spectra the mean square values of the angular momenta about the three principal axes of inertia and the intensities were calculated.

Assuming tetrahedral geometry and identical bond lengths of 1.094 A for CH2D2 the moments of inertia, reciprocal moments in cm−1 units, and the asymmetry parameter κ were obtained.

For the calculated value of κ=−0.27, α, β, and γ, as defined by Allen [2], were obtained by linear interpolation in published tables [5] of E(κ) for each energy level.

α, β, and γ may be shown to be identical with Pz2, Px2, and Py2, respectively, in an Ir representation [6]. The energy of a rotational level in a given vibrational state, neglecting centrifugal distortion, may be written as [2]:

E(JK1,K1)=αAv+βBv+γCv,

and the difference between two rotational levels in the same vibrational state as:

ΔF=ΔαAv+ΔβBv+ΔγCv.

The Δα’s, Δβ’s and Δγ’s for each of the ΔF2’s observable from strong transitions in the A- and C-type band were calculated.

The strong transitions for the A-type band are those which satisfy the selection rules:

ΔJ=0,±1ΔK1=0ΔK1=±1,

and for the C-type band the strong transitions are those for which

ΔJ=0,±1ΔK1=±1ΔK1=0.

The relative intensities of the transitions were calculated by combining the Boltzmann factor, calculated using the estimated moments of inertia, and nuclear spin statistics with the appropriate line strengths from published tables [7].

The nuclear spins of the equivalent pairs of hydrogen and deuterium atoms in CH2D2 give rise to degeneracies of the rotational levels. For the ground vibrational state the statistical weight factors are 15 for the symmetric (A) rotational levels and 21 for the antisymmetric (B) levels.

The A-type band at 2672 cm−1 has been previously observed by Wilmshurst and Bernstein [8] who assigned it to the combination v3+v9. As the observed band type is consistent with this assignment and there should be no other bands of this type near 2670 cm−1, there appears to be no reason to doubt the assignment.

The C-type band at 4425 cm−1 can best be assigned at v3+v6 as this seems to be the only combination which would give a C-type band in the region 4400–4500 cm−1.

4. Analysis

As each of the bands was isolated from others of comparable intensity, initial assignments, with the aid of the calculated intensities, could be made by inspection. From the initial assignments ΔF2 values were obtained, and with the calculated Δα’s, Δβ’s and Δγ’s were used to refine the values of A, B, and C in the ground and upper vibrational states. From these values of A, B, and C, α’s, β’s, and γ’s pertinent to the value of κ in each vibrational state were calculated as before.

A trial spectrum was then calculated from the expression:

v=v0+αAv+βBv+γCvαA0βB0γC0.

From the trial spectrum and intensities more transitions could be assigned, enabling further refinement of the reciprocal moments of inertia.

While this iterative procedure worked well with the C-type band, Coriolis perturbations in the A-type band caused some difficulty in definitely locating some of the transitions.

The lowest observably perturbed level in the v3+v9 vibrational state is the 413 level which is pushed down by 0.24 cm−1. For J=5, the levels 505, 514, and 523 are all perturbed, and for J= 6 over half of the levels are perturbed.

This perturbation has not been investigated in detail. It probably arises through interaction with the vibrational state 2v5, the fundamental of which is theoretically inactive in the infrared, but appears to have been observed at 1329 cm−1 [8], the transitions becoming allowed through Coriolis perturbation. v5 has apparently been observed in the Raman also at 1333 cm−1 [9].

No account was taken of the effect of centrifugal distortion in this analysis. Since only levels with low J values were used in the analysis, the effect of this correction on the rotational constants was minimized. No systematic differences between the observed and calculated spectra were noticed until rather high J values were reached. In these regions of the absorption serious overlapping of transitions make the unique assignment of transitions to observed absorption peaks doubtful.

Although no statistical analysis of the data was made, the excellent agreement between the observed and calculated ΔF2 values for the ground state, and the sensitivity of the calculated ΔF2 values to values of the rotational constants seem to indicate a probable error of the order of ±0.002 cm−1 for each of the ground state constants. The agreement between the calculated and observed values of ΔF2 for the ground state may be seen in table 1.

Table 1.

Ground state ΔF2

A-type band
C-type band
ΔF2 Calculated Observed ΔF2 Calculated Observed






cm−1 cm−1 cm−1 cm−1
000–202 19.513 19.55 000–220 23.911 23.92
101–303 32.103 32.10 101–321 37.524 37.53
111–313 31.547 31.55 111–331 41.285 41.29
110–312 33.791 33.79 110–330 40.862 40.88
202–404 44.373 44.38 202–422 51.644 51.64
212–414 43.976 43.98 212–432 55.068 55.06
211–413 46.958 46.96 211–431 53.908 53.91
221–423 45.754 45.76 221–441 58.305 58.27
220–422 47.277 47.25 220–440 58.165 58.16
303–505 56.501 56.50 303–523 66.378 66.37
313–515 56.300 56.28 313–533 69.201 69.20
312–514 59.715 59.69 312–532 67.212 69.23
322–524 58.539 58.54 322–542 71.733 71.73
321–523 60.967 60.96 321–541 71.127 71.12
331–533 59.463 59.47 331–551 75.463 75.43
330–532 60.141 60.13 330–550 75.431 75.43
404–606 68.637 68.61 404–624 81.651 81.64
414–616 68.559 68.53 414–634 83.676 83.63
413–615 72.042 71.98 413–633 81.042 81.03
423–625 71.147 71.11 423–643 85.399 85.38
422–624 74.350 74.33 422–642 83.950 83.93
432–634 72.585 72.55 432–652 88.728 88.65
431–633 74.092 74.07 431–651 88.532 88.52
441–643 72.848 72.81 441–661 92.665 92.56
440–642 73.062 73.02 440–660 92.660 92.56

The constants for the excited states of these bands cannot be determined as precisely as those for the ground state with the available ΔF2 values, but ±0.005 cm−1 would seem to be a generous estimate of the probable error in the constants for these states. The calculated and observed ΔF2 values for the excited states are compared in tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. C-type band ΔF2.

A=4.255 cm−1 B=3.590 cm−1 C=3.151 cm−1

ΔF2 Calc Obs



cm−1 cm−1
000–220 23.918 23.96
101–321 37.927 37.94
111–331 41.086 41.12
110–330 40.685 40.70
202–422 52.436 52.44
212–432 55.238 55.25
211–431 54.163 54.18
221–441 57.925 57.91
220–440 57.778 57.80
303–523 67.521 67.51
313–533 69.726 69.74
312–532 67.944 67.93
322–542 71.753 71.74
321–541 71.131 71.15
331–551 74.891 74.82
330–550 74.854 74.82
404–624 83.064 82.95
414–634 84.534 84.48
413–633 82.268 82.15
423–643 85.784 85.82
422–642 84.431 84.42
432–652 88.552 88.51
431–651 88.324 88.32
441–061 91.899 91.83
440–660 91.890 91.83

Table 3. A-type band ΔF2.

A=4.254 cm−1 B=3.654 cm−1 C=3.019 cm−1

ΔF2 Calc Obs



cm−1 cm−1
000–202   19.715 19.70
101–303   33.132 32.11
111–313   31.617 31.62
110–312   34.688 34.68
202–404   44.163 44.17
212–414   43.916 43.91
211–413a 47.748 47.51
221–423   46.516 46.54
220–422   48.979 48.96
303–505a 56.159 56.51
313–515   56.080 56.07
312–514a 60.078 59.35
322–524   59.144 59.11
321–523a 62.809 62.70
331–533   60.862 60.86
330–532   62.271 62.59
a

Perturbed levels.

The constants determined for the three vibrational levels are given in table 4. The band origins were determined from the best fit between the observed and calculated spectra for low J values.

Table 4.

Rotational and vibrational constants

Ground state v3+v9 v3+v6



cm−1 cm−1 cm−1
A 4.303   4.254   4.255
B 3.504   3.654   3.590
C 3.049   3.019   3.151
v0 2671.67 4425.61

Figure 1. The A-type hand of CH2D2 at 2672 cm−1.

Figure 1

The identification given is the ground state designation of JK1,K1 for R0,1 transitions to the high wave number side of the band origin, and for P0, 1¯ transitions to the low wave number side of the band origin.

Figure 2. The C-type band of CH2D2 at 4426 cm−1.

Figure 2

The identification given is the ground state designation of JK1,K1 for R1,0 transitions to the high wave number side of the band origin, and for P1¯, 0 transitions to the low wave number side of the band origin.

Footnotes

*

This work was supported in part by the Division of Chemistry, Atomic Energy Commission.

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

5. References

  • 1.Among the more recent high resolution analyses are those of:; Hecht KT. J Mol Spectroscopy. 1960;5:355, 390. [Google Scholar]; Thomas MA, Welsh HL. Can J Phys. 1960;38:1291. [Google Scholar]; Moret-Bailly J. Cahiers de Phys. 1961;130–131:1. [Google Scholar]; Olafson RA, Thomas MA, Welsh HL. Can J Phys. 1961;39:419. [Google Scholar]; Allen HC, Jr, Plyler EK. J Research NBS. 1959;63:145. doi: 10.6028/jres.063A.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Richardson EH, Brodersen S, Krause L, Welsh HL. J Mol Spectroscopy. 1962;8:406. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Allen HC., Jr Phil Trans Roy Soc London. 1961;A253:335. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gailar N, Plyler EK. J Research NBS. 1955;45:102. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.E. K. Plyler, L. R. Blaine, and E. D. Tidwell, ibid., 55, 279 (1955).
  • 5.Townes CH, Schawlow AL. Microwave Spectroscopy. McGraw-Hill; New York: 1955. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bragg JK, Golden S. Phys Rev. 1949;75:735. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cross PC, Hainer RM, King GW. J Chem Phys. 1944;12:210. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wilmshurst JK, Bernstein HJ. Can J Chem. 1957;35:226. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mac Wood GE, Urey HC. J Chem Phys. 1936;4:402. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES