Skip to main content
Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research logoLink to Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research
. 2017 Feb 16;23:850–855. doi: 10.12659/MSM.899198

Significance of Glypican-3 (GPC3) Expression in Hepatocellular Cancer Diagnosis

Bin Sun 1,C,D,*, Zhi Huang 2,C,E,*, Bi Wang 3,C,F, Yanglong Yu 4,D,F,G, Shihai Lin 1,E,F, Lei Luo 1,A,G, Yuzhu Wang 1,B,F, Zheng Huang 1,A,B,
PMCID: PMC5325041  PMID: 28207681

Abstract

Background

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a malignant tumor that is common China. Early diagnosis is of great significance for improving treatment efficiency. GPC3 level is closely related to HCC occurrence. This study investigated GPC3 expression in HCC patient serum and tissue, and assessed the significance of GPC3 combined AFP detection in HCC diagnosis.

Material/Methods

A total of 76 HCC patients in our hospital were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry was applied to test GPC3 expression in cancer tissue and para-carcinoma tissue. ELISA and RT-PCR were used to detect GPC3 and AFP level in serum. The significance of GPC3 single or combined AFP detection in HCC diagnosis was analyzed.

Results

Immunohistochemistry showed that the GPC3 positive expression rate was obviously elevated in HCC tissue (P<0.01). Combination detection of AFP and GPC3 presented significantly higher sensitivity and specificity in HCC than single AFP or GPC3 detection. ELISA showed no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy compared with RT-PCR.

Conclusions

Serum GPC3 was overexpressed in HCC patients. Combination detection of serum AFP and GPC3 can enhance accuracy and efficacy of HCC diagnosis.

MeSH Keywords: Antifreeze Proteins, Type II; Antifreeze Proteins, Type III; Genes, rev; Headache Disorders, Primary; MART-1 Antigen

Background

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a kind of malignant liver cancer derived from liver cell cancerization [1]. In China, HCC is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths after lung cancer, with the 5-year survival rate of less than 5% [2]. As with other malignant tumors, the pathogenesis of HCC is unclear. However, it is generally believed that HCC is closely related to liver cirrhosis, viral hepatitis, and chemical carcinogens [3]. Although great progress has been made in HCC treatment, including minimally invasive surgery, interventional embolization chemotherapy, and liver transplantation, tumor recurrence and metastasis still cannot be prevented [4,5]. Studies showed that HCC early diagnosis and treatment can greatly improve the efficiency of HCC treatment and extend patient life [6].

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is abundantly expressed in the development of human embryos and expression stops after birth. However, the synthesis of AFP is restored when liver cells become cancerous. It has been shown that the serum levels of AFP were elevated in 70–80% of liver cancer patients. Therefore, detection of levels of serum AFP for diagnosis of HCC has been widely recognized as being important [7].

However, there are still 30–40% of HCC patients with negative or low concentrations of serum AFP [8]. Multiple tumor markers combined detection is of great significance to improve HCC diagnosis rate, as well as to reduce misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis [9,10]. Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a member of the glypicans family that anchors to the cell surface through glycosylated phosphatidyl inositol. GPC3 protein is closely associated with the body’s growth and development through a variety of cytokines. GPC3 mutation leads to Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome (SGBS) [11]. Moreover, GPC3 is also expressed in multiple tumor cells and serum, such as HCC and melanoma [12,13]. Thus, this study aimed to investigate GPC3 expression in HCC patient serum and we discuss the significance of GPC3 detection in HCC early diagnosis.

Material and Methods

Subject selection

Between January 2012 and March 2015, a total of 76 HCC patients in the First People’s Hospital of Guiyang were enrolled into the HCC group, including 49 males and 27 females, with mean age of 52.1±7.8 (45–72) years old. All the patients were primary cases without chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or surgery. Patients with liver cirrhosis were selected as the cirrhosis group, including 24 males and 16 females, with mean age of 53.2±7.2 (40–72) years old. Thirty healthy volunteers were enrolled as normal controls, including 16 males and 14 females, with mean age of 51.3±7.3 (42–68) years old. All subjects were diagnosed by clinical medical history combined CT and MRI using the China liver disease diagnosis and treatment management standard and primary hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis standard. HCC patients were staged according to primary hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis standard, including 16 cases in stage I, 32 cases in stage II, and 28 cases in stage III. No significant difference was observed in general information among groups.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First People’s Hospital of Guiyang and all enrolled subjects had signed informed consent.

Immunohistochemistry

Cancer tissue and para-carcinoma tissue in the HCC group were obtained from surgery and fixed in formalin. The tissue was embedded by paraffin and sectioned at 0.5 μm. Paraffin sections were dewaxed by xylene and hydrated by gradient ethanol and distilled water. After blocking by 3% H2O2 solution, slices were washed by distilled water and PBS. Then the slices were blocked by 5% BSA at room temperature and GPC3 specific primary antibody was added at 37°C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, secondary antibody was added, followed by development at 37°C for 30 min. Slices were the developed in DAB for 10 min and observed under a microscope after re-staining, washing, dehydration, hyalinization, and mounting. Five random fields at 400× were selected to calculate cell number.

Result judgement: GPC3 is expressed on cell surface. Cells were regarded as positive when brown particles appeared on the cell surface. GPC3 positive was determined as positive cells >40% of total cell number.

ELISA

A total of 5 ml fasting venous blood was extracted and centrifuged to isolate serum. Serum AFP and GPC3 levels were detected by ELISA (Shanghai Yifeng Biological Technology Co., LTD). A 100-μl sample was added to the 96-well plate together with 100 μl PBS (pH=7.4) and kept at 4°C overnight. Next, the well was blocked by 2% H2O2-ethanol solution after being washed by PBS. After blocking by 1% BSA, we added AFP and GPC3 antibody (1:1000) at 37°C for 2 h. Then the well was treated by biotin-tagged secondary antibody (1:200) at 37°C for 1.5 h. After being developed by OPD substrate solution at room temperature for 6 min, the reaction was stopped by 0.2 mM H2SO4. The plate was read on a microplate reader (BioTek) to analyze AFP and GPC3 content.

RT-PCR

A total of 2 ml blood was put into an EDTA anticoagulation tube together with 2 ml PBS. After adding with 4 ml lymphocytes separation medium, the tube was centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 20 min. The white layer was peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Total RNA was extracted from PBMC to test GPC3, AFP, and β-actin levels. RT-PCR primers were as follows: GPC3-F, 5′-AGAGGCCTTTGAAATTGT-3′; GPC3-R, 5′-AAATACTTTCAGGTCACGTC-3′; actin-F, 5′-CGTAC CACTGGCATCGTGAT-3′; actin-R, 5′-GTGTTGGCGTACAGGTCTTTG-3′; AFP-F, 5′-TGGAATAGCTTCCATATTGGGATTC-3′; AFP-R, 5′-CCAGTTT GTTCAAGAAGCCACTT-3′. PCR reaction was 93°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 93°C for 30 s and 60°C for 1 min [14].

GPC3 combined AFP detection on HCC diagnosis analysis

An ROC curve was used to determine the critical value of HCC diagnosis. The minimum value of false-positive cases and false-negative cases was the cut-off value. The result ≥ cut-off value was regarded as positive and result < cut-off value was regarded as negative. Either one index ≥ cut-off value was determined as positive [14].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 software was applied for data analysis. Measurement data are presented as mean±standard deviation and compared by the Mann-Whitney U test. Correlation analysis was performed by Pearson rank correlation analysis. Inspection level α=0.05. P<0.05 was considered as statistical significance.

Results

GPC3 immunohistochemistry result

Immunohistochemistry was applied to test GPC3 expression in HCC cancer tissue and para-carcinoma tissue. Brown particles appearing on cell membranes indicated GPC3 positive expression (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1A, cell staining was not significant in para-carcinoma tissue. Cell membrane color was deeper in HCC cancer tissue compared with para-carcinoma tissue, suggesting that GPC3 level was elevated in HCC cancer tissue.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

GPC3 immunohistochemistry result (×400).

Five random fields (400×) were selected to calculate total number of cells and number of positive cell (Figure 2). The GPC3-positive rate in para-carcinoma tissue was only 3.95% (3/76), while it achieved 72.4% in cancer tissue. The positive rate of stage I was 37.3% (6/16), stage II was 71.9% (23/32), and stage III was 92.9% (26/28). These results indicated that GPC3 expression was upregulated in HCC cancer tissue, and its positive rate obviously increased following histological upstaging.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

GPC3 expression in HCC tissue. * P<0.01, compared with para-carcinoma tissue.

ELISA result

To determine serum GPC3 concentration in HCC patients, we used ELISA to test serum AFP and GPC3 level (Table 1). We found that the concentration of serum GPC3 and AFP in HCC patients was 272.5±13.3 ng/mL and 404.2±12.6 ng/mL, respectively, which was obviously different from that in controls (P<0.01). No significant difference was observed between the cirrhosis group and chronic liver disease group. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the correlation coefficient of GPC3 concentration with histological grade was r=0.89 (P>0.05), suggesting that the correlation was not significant. The correlation coefficient of serum GPC3 concentration with AFP was r=0.96 (P<0.01), indicating significant correlation.

Table 1.

Serum GPC3 and AFP level.

Group n AFP (ng/mL) GPC3 (ng/mL)
Control 30 47.2±9.1 56.2±6.1
Chronic liver disease 40 52.5±10.5 57.5±8.3
Cirrhosis group 30 55.3±7.6 661.9±6.8
HCC group 76 404.2±12.6*#& 272.5±13.3*#&
*

P<0.01, compared with control;

#

P<0.01, compared with chronic liver disease;

&

P<0.01, compared with cirrhosis group.

Combined analysis of GPC3 and AFP detection in HCC diagnosis

To analyze the significance of combined serum GPC3 and AFP detection in HCC early diagnosis, we investigated sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of different indices (Table 2). The sensitivity and specificity of single AFP detection was 77.6% and 81.3%, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity of single GPC3 detection was 75.0% and 81.8%, respectively. However, the sensitivity and specificity of combined detection reached 85.5% and 91.5%, respectively. ELISA showed no significant difference in sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy with RT-PCR (P>0.05).

Table 2.

GPC3 combined AFP detection on HCC diagnosis analysis.

Method Index Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Accuracy (%)
ELISA AFP 77.6 (59/76) 84 (84/100) 81.3 (143/176)
GPC3 75.0 (57/76) 87 (87/100) 81.8 (144/176)
AFP+GPC3 85.5 (65/76) 96 (96/100) 91.5 (161/176)
RT-PCR AFP 69.7 (53/76) 90 (90/100) 86.9 (153/176)
GPC3 67.1 (51/76) 89 (89/100) 685.2 (150/176)
AFP+GPC3 78.9 (60/76) 99 (99/100) 90.3 (159/176)

Discussion

HCC early diagnosis and treatment can effectively improve treatment effect and quality of life. Thus, screening molecular markers with high specificity and good sensitivity is of great significance to improve HCC early diagnosis and reduce misdiagnosis [15]. This study tested cancer tissue GPC3 expression in HCC patients at different clinical stages by immunohistochemistry. The results showed that the GPC3 positive expression rate was obviously elevated in HCC tissue, and it gradually increased following clinical upstaging.

GPC3 is a member of the glypicans family that can anchor on the cell surface by glycosylated phosphatidyl inositol. GPC3 protein is closely associated with growth and development [16]. It was reported that GPC3 is a potential biomarker for malignant tumors because it is upregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and melanoma [12]. However, GPC3 protein level is reduced in ovarian cancer and breast cancer [17]. In addition, it was also reported that GPC3 function had organizational dependence. It can suppress tumor cell division in some organizations, but becomes the oncofetal protein in the other parts [18].

MiR-219-5p can mediate GPC3 mRNA expression at the posttranscriptional level [19]. microRNA microarray analysis revealed that miR-219-5p was downregulated by more than 50% in HCC cancer cells, leading to GPC3 overexpression [20]. GPC3 expresses in HCC cells but not normal liver cells, which also suggests that GPC3 could be a potential target for HCC treatment. Zhu et al. injected GPC3 monoclonal antibody in advanced HCC patients with different GPC3 levels, and found that tumor progression time in patients with high GPC3 level was longer than that with low expression level [21].

AFP is highly expressed in human embryonic development process, and stops synthesis after birth. However, AFP synthetic ability is recovered during liver cell cancerization. Serum AFP is elevated in about 70~80% of HCC patients; thus, measuring serum AFP level in HCC patients for diagnosis has been widely accepted. However, there are still 20~30% of advanced HCC patients without significant changes of serum AFP level, resulting in leak detection [7]. This study discussed the meaning of GPC3 as a molecular marker in HCC early diagnosis. GPC3 showed similar accuracy and sensitivity with AFP in HCC diagnosis, while combined detection can significantly enhance the accuracy and sensitivity [22].

Conclusions

We used total RNA from PBMC to test AFP and GPC3 mRNA level by RT-PCR. RT-PCR had results consistent with ELISA, suggesting that we could use PBMC to test AFP and GPC3 level by RT-PCR. It had higher efficacy, less window phase, and higher throughput compared with ELISA, which is of great significance for early diagnosis of HCC [23].

Footnotes

Source of support: Departmental sources

References

  • 1.El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1264–73e1261. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, et al. Report of incidence and mortality in China cancer registries, 2009. Chin J Cancer Res. 2013;25:10–21. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2012.12.04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Palmer WC, Patel T. Are common factors involved in the pathogenesis of primary liver cancers? A meta-analysis of risk factors for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;57:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fuks D, Dokmak S, Paradis V, et al. Benefit of initial resection of hepatocellular carcinoma followed by transplantation in case of recurrence: An intention-to-treat analysis. Hepatology. 2012;55:132–40. doi: 10.1002/hep.24680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Blachier M, Leleu H, Peck-Radosavljevic M, et al. The burden of liver disease in Europe: A review of available epidemiological data. J Hepatol. 2013;58:593–608. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Maluccio M, Covey A. Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:394–99. doi: 10.3322/caac.21161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Zhang J, Li Y, Zeng XC, et al. miR-630 overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma tissues is positively correlated with alpha-fetoprotein. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:667–73. doi: 10.12659/MSM.892515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lei C, Rao X, Su Q. Diagnostic value of Joint Detection of GP73 and AFP-L3 in Primary Hepatic Carcinoma with Low Concentration of AFP. Journal of International Translational Medicine. 2015;3:28–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen K, Zhang H, Zhang LN, et al. Value of circulating cell-free DNA in diagnosis of hepatocelluar carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:3143–49. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ning S, Bin C, Na H, et al. Glypican-3, a novel prognostic marker of hepatocellular cancer, is related with postoperative metastasis and recurrence in hepatocellular cancer patients. Mol Biol Rep. 2012;39:351–57. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0745-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yamamoto K, Imamura H, Matsuyama Y, et al. AFP, AFP-L3, DCP, and GP73 as markers for monitoring treatment response and recurrence and as surrogate markers of clinicopathological variables of HCC. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1272–82. doi: 10.1007/s00535-010-0278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Castillo LF, Tascon RS, de Kier Joffé EB, Peters MG. Role of Glypican-3 (GPC3) on tumor progression of the human mammary gland. Cancer Research. 2014;79:133–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang L, Liu H, Sun L, et al. Glypican-3 as a potential differential diagnosis marker for hepatocellular carcinoma: A tissue microarray-based study. Acta Histochem. 2012;114:547–52. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ogunwobi OO, Trinh TI, Liu C. Human glypican-3 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression via induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Cancer Research. 2012;72:2413. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dong Z, Yao M, Wang L, et al. Down-regulating glypican-3 expression: Molecular-targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2014;14:1183–93. doi: 10.2174/1389557515666150101105135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Llovet JM, Pena CE, Lathia CD, et al. SHARP Investigators Study Group. Plasma biomarkers as predictors of outcome in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2290–300. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cottereau E, Moizard MP, David A, et al. Duplication of exon 2 of the GPC3 gene in a case of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:282–84. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tascon RS, Castillo L, de Kier Joffé EB, Peters MG. Glypican-3 (GPC3) inhibits the metastasis development in a murine breast cancer model through the activation of p38MAPK signaling pathway. Cancer Research. 2015;75:3256–56. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Valsechi MC, Oliveira AB, Conceicao AL, et al. GPC3 reduces cell proliferation in renal carcinoma cell lines. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:631. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Huang N, Lin J, Ruan J, et al. MiR-219-5p inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation by targeting glypican-3. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:884–91. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Giordano S, Columbano A. MicroRNAs: New tools for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma? Hepatology. 2013;57:840–47. doi: 10.1002/hep.26095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Feng M, Ho M. Glypican-3 antibodies: A new therapeutic target for liver cancer. FEBS Lett. 2014;588:377–82. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wang Z, Gou W, Liu M, et al. Expression of P53 and HSP70 in chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and early and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma tissues and their diagnostic value in hepatocellular carcinoma: An immunohistochemical study. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:3209–215. doi: 10.12659/MSM.895592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yasuda E, Kumada T, Toyoda H, et al. Evaluation for clinical utility of GPC3, measured by a commercially available ELISA kit with Glypican-3 (GPC3) antibody, as a serological and histological marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res. 2010;40:477–85. doi: 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2010.00624.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES