ABSTRACT
Infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) present a major problem for therapeutic management. We report here our experience with 12 patients with a severe MDRPA infection (6 of which were pneumonia) who received salvage therapy with ceftolozane-tazobactam after inappropriate empirical treatment and/or suboptimal targeted treatment. Although 10 of the 12 patients (83.3%) experienced septic shock, only 3 patients (25%) died during the follow-up period. Microbiological cure in 7 patients (58.3%) was observed.
KEYWORDS: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, salvage therapy, ceftolozane-tazobactam
TEXT
The increase in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDRPA) in recent years has hindered the selection of an appropriate antibiotic treatment, leading to an increase in the morbidity and mortality rates in patients with such an infection (1, 2).
In patients with MDRPA infection, resistance to widely used antibiotics, such as antipseudomonal beta-lactams or quinolones, has led to the use of alternative treatment, such as colistin or aminoglycosides, which confer a high risk of nephrotoxicity (3, 4).
To overcome this problem, new antibiotics, such as ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T), which can be an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of MDRPA infections (5, 6), were recently developed. C-T is a new combination of an antipseudomonal cephalosporin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor. The drug exhibits potent in vitro activity against MDRPA strains and other Gram-negative microorganisms, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing (ESBL) Enterobacteriaceae (although activity against ESBL Klebsiella is lower than that against other ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae) (7, 8). The efficacy of C-T was evaluated in two pivotal phase III trials that resulted in the drug being approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection, including acute pyelonephritis (9), and in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections associated with metronidazole (10).
In spite of the results of these clinical trials, experience regarding the clinical and microbiological efficacy of C-T in other indications has been limited, especially in patients with severe infection in whom this antimicrobial has been used due to the lack of response to previous antibiotic treatment.
We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, multicenter study of consecutive patients in a series of compassionate uses of C-T in Spain between September 2015 and June 2016. Each patient received C-T as salvage therapy. Included in the study were patients who (i) were 18 years or older and (ii) had an MDRPA infection that was unresponsive to previous antibiotic treatment. Strains were considered to be MDR when resistance to at least three of the following antimicrobials was present: antipseudomonal cephalosporin (cefepime), piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, and aminoglycosides.
Infections were classified according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (11). The MIC of C-T was determined using an MIC test strip assay (Liofilchem, Italy). To determine the sensitivity or resistance of P. aeruginosa to antibiotic treatment, (EUCAST) breakpoints were used.
A total of 12 patients with different severe MDRPA infections were included (Table 1). The median age of the patients was 67 years (range, 54 to 75 years), and most of them had significant comorbidities. All cases were hospital-acquired infections with a median time from admission to the isolation of MDRPA of 28 days (range, 10 to 56 days). All patients produced isolates resistant to antipseudomonal beta-lactams (including meropenem), ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin-tazobactam, and 9 of them (75%) were resistant to aminoglycosides. The isolates from 8 patients (66.6%) were sensitive to colistin. In contrast, all isolates obtained after initial clinical failure were sensitive to C-T. Prior to obtaining the culture results, empirical treatment was initiated in 11 patients for a median duration of 7 days (range, 2 to 9 days) and later changed to targeted therapy (mainly with colistin) for a median duration of 7.5 days (range, 9 to 18 days). Finally, when clinical failure of the initial targeted therapy was detected, treatment with C-T was initiated for a median duration of 12 days (range, 9 to 18 days) from the start of empirical treatment.
TABLE 1.
Patient characteristics and clinical outcomes of ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment as salvage therapy for MDRPA infection
| Patient no. | Age (yrs), sex | Comorbidity(ies) | Treatment susceptibility (MIC [mg/liter])a | Primary focus(es) of infection | Procedure | Presence of bacteremia | Initial presentation of infection | Prior antibiotic therapy | Duration (days), dose of C-T treatment (g/8 h) | Outcome |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinicalb | Microbiologicalc | ||||||||||
| 1 | 65, female | Diabetes mellitus | C-T (0.25), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (4) | Abdominal | Drainage of abscess | Yes | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 2 g/8 h; targeted: CST 4.5 mIU/12 h | 14, 1.5 | Cure | Eradication |
| 2 | 75, female | None | C-T (0.5), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (<4) | Respiratory | None | Yes | Septic shock | Empirical: TZP 4.5 g/8 h; targeted: CST 4.5 mIU/12 h | 10, 3 | Cure | Eradication |
| 3 | 37, male | Bronchomalacia | C-T (0.5), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (<4) | Respiratory | None | No | Severe sepsis | Empirical: TZP 4.5 g/8 h; targeted: CST 4.5 mIU/12 h | 10, 3 | Cure | Eradication |
| 4 | 70, male | None | C-T (0.5), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (<4) | Abdominal | Drainage of abscess | No | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 2 g/8 h; targeted: CST 4.5 mIU/12 h | 21, 1.5 | Cure | Eradication |
| 5 | 45, male | Burkitt lymphoma, severe neutropenia | C-T (2), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Otitis and mastoiditis | Drainage | No | Sepsis | Empirical: FEP 2 g/8 h + amikacin 1 g/24 h; targeted: C-T 1.5/0.5 g/8 h | 21, 3 | Cure; late recurrence | Eradication; late recurrence |
| 6 | 74, male | Lung cancer, diabetes mellitus, COPD,d acute renal failure | C-T (2), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Respiratory | None | Yes | Septic shock | Empirical: none; targeted: TZP 4.5 g/6 h + inhaled CST 2 mIU/8 h | 15, 3 | Death | Eradication |
| 7 | 53, male | Hepatitis C infection | C-T (<4), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (64/4), TOB (>4) | Abdominal | Laparotomy | No | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 2 g/8 h + daptomycin 600 mg/24 h; targeted: C-T 1 g/8 h | 11, 1.5 | Death | Persistence |
| 8 | 76, female | Diabetes mellitus, COPD | C-T (1), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Biliary | Biliary drainage | No | Septic shock | Empirical: aztreonam 2 g/8 h + tigecycline 100 mg/12 h + fluconazole 400 mg/24 h; targeted: CST 3 mIU/12 h + aztreonam 2 g/8 h + tigecycline 100 mg/12 h + fluconazole 400 mg/24 h | 9, 1.5 | Cure | Eradication; late recurrence |
| 9 | 79, male | Diabetes mellitus, COPD, renal failure, chronic heart failure | C-T (1), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Venous Central Catheter | Catheter removal | Yes | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 500 mg/12 h; targeted: MEM 2 g/8 h + amikacin 15 mg/kg/24 h | 14, 1.5 | Cure | Eradication |
| 10 | 79, male | None | C-T (1), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Respiratory | None | No | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 2 g/12 h + CST 4.5 mIU/12 h; targeted: C-T 1.5/0.5 g/8 h | 14, 1.5 | Cure | No data |
| 11 | 61, male | Immunosuppression | C-T (1), MEM (8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Respiratory | None | Yes | Septic shock | Empirical: MEM 2 g/8 h; targeted: CST 2 mIU/8 h | 3, 1.5 | Death | Persistence |
| 12 | 58, male | Lung transplantation, acute renal failure, immunosuppression, mediastinitis | C-T (1), MEM (>8), CIP (>1), FEP (>8), TZP (>16), TOB (>4) | Respiratory | None | No | Septic shock | Empirical: ceftazidime 6 g/day (continued infusion) + amikacin 1 g/24 h; targeted 1st line: ceftazidime 6 g/day (continued infusion) + amikacin 1 g/24 h; targeted 2nd line: CST 3 mIU/8 h | 21, 1.5 | Cure | Persistence |
C-T, ceftolozane-tazobactam; MEM, meropenem; CST, colistin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FEP, cefepime; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; TOB, tobramycin.
Thirty days after isolation of P. aeruginosa. Clinical outcome was considered “cure” when the attending physician observed resolution of signs and symptoms and there were no radiologic findings of infection.
Thirty days after end of therapy with ceftolozane-tazobactam.
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Although infection presented as septic shock in 10 of the 12 patients (83.3%), only 3 out of the 12 patients (25%) died during the follow-up period despite the initial severity, inappropriate empirical treatment, and delayed initiation of C-T. One of these patients underwent a pulmonary lobectomy for a Pancoast tumor that required a long stay in the intensive care unit, although due to bone metastasis, aggressive measures were limited (patient 6). However, results of blood and bronchial aspirate cultures performed before death were confirmed to be negative in this patient. The other 2 patients with septic shock who died had significant comorbidities. One of them (patient 11) received C-T at doses of 1.5 g/8 h despite having pneumonia.
In 6 of the 12 patients (50%) C-T was used for the treatment of pneumonia, although this antibiotic is not currently approved for this indication. In all these cases, C-T was administered as salvage therapy, given the presence of severe sepsis or septic shock unresponsive to initial treatment with meropenem, colistin, ceftazidime, or piperacillin-tazobactam, depending on the case. Previous studies have shown that C-T has good lung penetration (12), and it has been used to treat patients with MDRPA pneumonia with good results (13, 14), although the efficacy of C-T in this indication should be evaluated through clinical trials, which are currently in progress (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02387372).
C-T was used safely in most patients, although treatment had to be suspended in one patient (patient 6) due to the development of dissociated cholestasis.
In 10 patients (83.3%), microbiological eradication was observed 30 days after completion of treatment with C-T, which is similar to observations in previous studies (8). In these patients, the median duration of treatment with C-T was 14 days (range, 9 to 21). However, 2 of these patients (patients 5 and 8) produced C-T-resistant MDRPA isolates in cultures taken subsequent to this period (the MIC for C-T was 48 mg/liter in both cases). Only one of these two patients (a patient with Burkitt lymphoma and profound neutropenia who had otomastoiditis) experienced clinical recurrence despite having been treated with high doses of C-T (3 g/8 h), which were given because of uncertainty about its penetration into the focus of infection. Therefore, the possibility of acquiring resistance to C-T should be considered in patients with previous exposure to beta-lactams and with recurrence or poor response to this antibiotic (15). For this reason, it might be advisable to test the MIC of C-T in patients with severe infection, a history of infection, and previous treatment against P. aeruginosa (even if the isolation is multisensitive).
In conclusion, the results of our series provide encouraging evidence of the efficacy of C-T in patients with serious infection (especially pneumonia) caused by MDRPA. This evidence needs to be confirmed in larger patient cohorts and ultimately in randomized trials.
REFERENCES
- 1.Cabot G, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Tubau F, Macia MD, Rodriguez C, Moya B, Zamorano L, Suárez C, Peña C, Martínez-Martínez L, Oliver A; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). 2011. Overexpression of AmpC and efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from bloodstream infections: prevalence and impact on resistance in a Spanish multicenter study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:1906–1911. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01645-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jones RN, Sader HS, Beach ML. 2003. Contemporary in vitro spectrum of activity summary for antimicrobial agents tested against 18569 strains non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli isolated in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997–2001). Int J Antimicrob Agents 22:551–556. doi: 10.1016/S0924-8579(03)00245-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martis N, Leroy S, Blanc V. 2014. Colistin in multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa blood-stream infections: a narrative review for the clinician. J Infect 69:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nakamura I, Yamaguchi T, Tsukimori A, Sato A, Fukushima S, Matsumoto T. 2015. New options of antibiotic combination therapy for multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:83–87. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2192-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cho JC, Fiorenza MA, Estrada SJ. 2015. Ceftolozane/tazobactam: a novel cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. Pharmacotherapy 35:701–715. doi: 10.1002/phar.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hernández-Tejedor A, Merino-Vega CD, Martín-Vivas A, Ruiz de Luna-González R, Delgado-Iribarren A, Gabán-Díez A, Temprano-Gómez I, de la Calle-pedrosa N, González-Jimenez AI, Algora-Weber A. 2016. Successful treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa breakthrough bacteremia with ceftolozane/tazobactam. Infection doi: 10.1007/s15010-016-0944-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Jones RN. 2014. Ceftolozane/tazobactam activity tested against aerobic Gram-negative organisms isolated from intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in European and United States hospitals (2012). J Infect 69:266–277. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Tato M, García-Castillo M, Moreno Borafull A, Cantón R; CENIT Study Group. 2015. In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae recovered in Spanish medical centres: results of the CENIT study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 46:502–510. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wagenlehner FM, Umeh O, Steenbergen J, Yuan G, Darouiche RO. 2015. Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet 385:1949–1956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Solomkin J, Hershberger E, Miller B, Popejoy M, Friedland I, Steenbergen J, Yoon M, Collins S, Yuan G, Barie PS, Eckmann C. 2015. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infections in an era or multidrug resistance: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis 60:1462–1471. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garner JS, Jarvis WR, Emori TG, Horan TC, Hughes JM. 1988. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988. Am J Infect Control 16:128–140. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chandorkar G, Huntington JA, Gotfried MH, Rodvold KA, Umeh O. 2012. Intrapulmonary penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult subjects. J Antimicrob Chemother 67:2463–2469. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Soliman R, Lynch S, Meader E, Pike R, Turton JF, Hill RLR, Woodford N, Livermore DM. 2015. Successful ceftolozane/tazobactam treatment of chronic pulmonary infection with pan-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. JMM Case Rep 2: 10.1099/jmmcr.0.000025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alqaid A, Dougherty CK, Ahmad S. 2015. Triple antibiotic therapy with ceftolozane/tazobactam, colistin and rifampin for pan-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia. Southwest Respir Crit Care Chron 3:35–39. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cabot G, Bruchmann S, Mulet X, Zamorano L, Moyá B, Juan C, Haussler S, Oliver A. 2014. Pseudomonas aeruginosa ceftolozane-tazobactam resistance development requires multiple mutations leading to overexpression and structural modification of AmpC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3091–3099. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02462-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
