ABSTRACT
The activities of rifampin, rifapentine, bedaquiline, PA-824, clofazimine, nitazoxanide, isoniazid, amikacin, moxifloxacin, niclosamide, thioridazine, and pyrazinamide were tested against nonreplicating (dormant) Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under conditions of hypoxia at pHs 5.8 and 7.3, mimicking environments of cellular granulomas and caseous granulomas, respectively. At pH 5.8, several drugs killed dormant bacilli, with the best being rifampin and rifapentine. At pH 7.3, only rifampin and rifapentine efficiently killed dormant bacilli, while all other drugs showed little activity.
KEYWORDS: Mycobacterium tuberculosis, dormancy, hypoxia, killing, pH, rifampin, rifapentine, tuberculosis
TEXT
The etiologic agent of tuberculosis (TB) is Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Two billion people are latently infected with this organism, and in 10% of them, it reactivates to active TB in their lifetime (1). Currently, treatments require 6 months of combination therapy with isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), pyrazinamide (PZA), and ethambutol for active TB and 9 months of INH or 3 months of rifapentine (RFP) and INH for latent TB (2, 3). Active and latent TB infections comprise mixtures of cellular and caseous granulomas, with tubercle bacilli ranging from actively replicating (AR) to dormant nonreplicating (NR) stages (4). In cellular granulomas, replicating bacilli are killed by current therapy, while in low vascularized caseous granulomas, low oxygen pressure restricts the growth from the AR to the NR stage in their hypoxic centers, enabling M. tuberculosis to move into a dormant drug-refractory state.
The pH of the phagolysosomes of activated macrophages present in cellular granulomas is acidic (5), while in necrotic centers of hypoxic cholesterol/triacylglycerol-rich caseous granulomas, where dormant M. tuberculosis lives, the pH is 7.2 to 7.5 (6–8). No information on drug activity against NR M. tuberculosis grown in hypoxic neutral conditions is known. In this study, we investigated the growth patterns of NR M. tuberculosis at different pHs and measured the activities of 12 drugs against NR cells under hypoxic conditions at pHs 5.8 and 7.3, mimicking the environments of cellular granulomas and caseous granulomas, respectively.
Briefly, M. tuberculosis strain H37Rv was grown at 37°C for 40 days in 20- by 125-mm screw-cap tubes containing Dubos-Tween-albumin broth (DTAB) as previously described (9–11), but in the present study, the DTAB was adjusted to pHs 5.8, 6.6, 7.0, 7.4, and 7.6. For preparation of NR cells, log-phase cultures were diluted in DTAB and incubated in tubes with the caps tightly screwed and tight rubber caps put under the screw caps. Growth in the tubes was monitored by measuring pH, optical density at 600 nm, and CFU/ml on Middlebrook 7H10 (7H10) agar plates incubated at 37°C for 3 weeks. To determine drug activity against NR cells, 12- and 19-day-old hypoxic cultures (H12 and H19, respectively) were incubated with drugs for 7, 14, and 21 days. Drugs were added by syringe to H12 and H19 cultures at the following maximum concentrations of the drug in serum (Cmax) (10, 11): 8 μg/ml (RIF), 10 μg/ml (RFP), 1 μg/ml (bedaquiline [BQ]), 2 μg/ml (PA-824 [PA]), 1 μg/ml (clofazimine [CL]), 10 μg/ml (nitazoxanide [NZ]), 2 μg/ml (INH), 8 μg/ml (amikacin [AK]), 4 μg/ml (moxifloxacin [MX]), 0.3 μg/ml (niclosamide [NC]), and 0.5 μg/ml (thioridazine [TH]). Pyrazinamide was used at 100 μg/ml. After drug exposure, 1 ml of NR culture was washed and resuspended in 1 ml of DTAB, and 0.2 ml of the dilution was inoculated into 7H10 plates for determination of numbers of CFU/ml.
The kinetics of growth (CFU and optical density) and pHs of NR M. tuberculosis cultures at different initial pHs are shown in Fig. 1. All CFU numbers rapidly increased up to day 8 and then increased more slowly up to about day 16, followed by a decline to day 40 (Fig. 1A). At pHs 5.8 and 6.6, the numbers of CFU/ml were higher than those at pHs 7.0 and 7.4, and at pH 7.6, the numbers of CFU/ml were the lowest. The optical densities at all pHs increased up to about day 16, followed by a stabilization up to day 40 (Fig. 1B). The pHs of pH 5.8 and 6.6 culture media slightly increased, while the pHs of pH 7.0 and 7.4 culture media slightly decreased (Fig. 1C). The pH of pH 7.6 culture medium decreased by 0.24 from day 0 to 40. On the basis of these observations, we decided to test drug activity against NR cells using hypoxic 12-day-old (H12) and 19-day-old (H19) cells at pHs 5.8 and 7.3, obtained from pH 5.8 and 7.4 cultures, respectively.
FIG 1.
Growth and pH values of nonreplicating (NR) M. tuberculosis H37Rv cultures in Dubos-Tween-albumin broth adjusted at pHs 5.8, 6.6, 7.0, 7.4, and 7.6, respectively. Results are shown as mean (standard deviation) log10 CFU/ml (A), optical density at 600 nm (OD600) (B), and pH values (C) from two experiments.
The activities of 12 drugs against H12 and H19 NR cells on days 7, 14, and 21 are shown in Fig. 2. On day 21, H12 cells at pH 5.8 (Fig. 2A) were efficiently killed by RIF and RFP (≥6.2- and 5.3-log10-CFU reductions, respectively). The log10-CFU reductions for the other drugs were 3.6 (CL), 3.0 (BQ), 2.2 (PA), 2.1 (NZ), 1.3 (NC), 1.0 (PZA), 0.9 (MX), 0.6 (TH), and 0.2 (AK and INH) (Fig. 2A and C). The CFU reductions of H19 cells at pH 5.8 were higher than those of H12 cells for most drugs (Fig. 2B and D).
FIG 2.
Survival of nonreplicating (NR) cultures of M. tuberculosis after 0, 7, 14, and 21 days of exposure to drugs, as estimated by CFU counts. Twelve-day-old and 19-day-old hypoxic (H12 and H19, respectively) cultures at pH 5.8 (A to D) and pH 7.3 (E to H) were incubated with drugs. Ctrl, control; RIF, rifampin; RFP, rifapentine; BQ, bedaquiline; PA, PA-824; CL, clofazimine; NZ, nitazoxanide; INH, isoniazid; AK, amikacin; MX, moxifloxacin; NC, niclosamide; TH, thioridazine; PZA, pyrazinamide. The drug concentrations used were 8, 10, 1, 2, 1, 10, 2, 8, 4, 0.3, 0.5, and 100 μg/ml, respectively. Dashed lines indicate the limit of detection (5 CFU/ml). Means and standard deviations of values obtained from two experiments are shown.
H12 cells at pH 7.3 were efficiently killed by RIF and RFP (day 21, ≥5.2-log10-CFU reduction) but not by CL, BQ, NC, PZA, TH, or INH (7 to 21 days, ≤0.4-log10-CFU reduction) (Fig. 2E and G); MX, AK, PA, and NZ were slightly active (7 to 21 days, 0.7 to 1.1 log10-CFU reduction). H19 cells at pH 7.3 were efficiently killed by RIF and RFP (day 21, ≥5.2-log10-CFU reduction) but not by BQ, NC, PZA, MX, TH, AK, or INH (7 to 21 days, ≤0.4-log10-CFU reduction) (Fig. 2F and H); PA, NZ, and CL were slightly active (7 to 21 days, 0.7 to 0.9-log10-CFU reduction).
Overall, lipophilic RIF and RFP (logP 3.85 and 4.83, respectively) (see https://www.drugbank.ca/) were very active against dormant H12 and H19 cells, irrespective of acidic (pH 5.8) or neutral (pH 7.3) conditions. As we previously observed (11), at pH 5.8, lipophilic drugs (CL, BQ, PA, NZ, NC, and TH, logP ≥ 2.14) were usually more active against NR cells than hydrophilic drugs (PZA, MX, AK, and INH, logP ≤ 0.01). In contrast, under conditions mimicking caseous granulomas (hypoxia at pH 7.3), only the rifamycins RIF and RFP rapidly killed NR M. tuberculosis, while all other lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs tested had no or little effect. RIF is known to accumulate and maintain therapeutic levels in caseum, where dormant M. tuberculosis resides (12, 13), and a 3-month treatment of latent TB with RFP and INH was found to be noninferior to 9 months of INH treatment alone (3, 14). Overall, our Wayne model experiment in hypoxia at pH 7.3 mimicking caseum may be important for testing the activity of new drugs and/or combinations against NR M. tuberculosis and guiding the selection of future therapies inhibiting the reactivation of latent TB to active TB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge Janssen Pharmaceuticals and the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development for the provision of bedaquiline and PA-824, respectively.
REFERENCES
- 1.World Health Organization. 2015. Global tuberculosis report. WHO/HTM/TB/2015.22 World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zumla A, Chakaya J, Centis R, D'Ambrosio L, Mwaba P, Bates M, Kapata N, Nyirenda T, Chanda D, Mfinanga S, Hoelscher M, Maeurer M, Migliori GB. 2015. Tuberculosis treatment and management—an update on treatment regimens, trials, new drugs, and adjunct therapies. Lancet Respir Med 3:220–234. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kahwati LC, Feltner C, Halpern M, Woodell CL, Boland E, Amick HR, Weber RP, Jonas DE. 2016. Primary care screening and treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in adults: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 316:970–983. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lenaerts A, Barry CE III, Dartois V. 2015. Heterogeneity in tuberculosis pathology, microenvironments and therapeutic responses. Immunol Rev 264:288–307. doi: 10.1111/imr.12252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gengenbacher M, Kaufmann SH. 2012. Mycobacterium tuberculosis: success through dormancy. FEMS Microbiol Rev 36:514–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00331.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kim MJ, Wainwright HC, Locketz M, Bekker LG, Walther GB, Dittrich C, Visser A, Wang W, Hsu FF, Wiehart U, Tsenova L, Kaplan G, Russell DG. 2010. Caseation of human tuberculosis granulomas correlates with elevated host lipid metabolism. EMBO Mol Med 2:258–274. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201000079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lanoix JP, Lenaerts AJ, Nuermberger EL. 2015. Heterogeneous disease progression and treatment response in a C3HeB/FeJ mouse model of tuberculosis. Dis Model Mech 8:603–610. doi: 10.1242/dmm.019513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lanoix JP, Ioerger T, Ormond A, Kaya F, Sacchettini J, Dartois V, Nuermberger E. 2016. Selective inactivity of pyrazinamide against tuberculosis in C3HeB/FeJ mice is best explained by neutral pH of caseum. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:735–743. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01370-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wayne LG, Hayes LG. 1996. An in vitro model for sequential study of shiftdown of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through two stages of nonreplicating persistence. Infect Immun 64:2062–2069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Piccaro G, Giannoni F, Filippini P, Mustazzolu A, Fattorini L. 2013. Activities of drug combinations against Mycobacterium tuberculosis grown in aerobic and hypoxic acidic conditions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1428–1433. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02154-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Piccaro G, Poce G, Biava M, Giannoni F, Fattorini L. 2015. Activity of lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs against dormant and replicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 68:711–714. doi: 10.1038/ja.2015.52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dartois V. 2014. The path of anti-tuberculosis drugs: from blood to lesions to mycobacterial cells. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:159–167. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sarathy JP, Zuccotto F, Hsinpin H, Sandberg L, Via LE, Marriner GA, Masquelin T, Wyatt P, Ray P, Dartois V. 2016. Prediction of drug penetration in tuberculosis lesions. ACS Infect Dis 2:552–563. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.6b00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Getahun H, Matteelli A, Chaisson RE, Raviglione M. 2015. Latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. N Engl J Med 372:2127–2135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1405427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


