REPLY
We thank Wong and colleagues (1) for taking our work (2) a step further by investigating the impact of a subinhibitory concentration of clindamycin on ST30 strains of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). In our study, we observed that subinhibitory concentrations of the protein synthesis inhibitor clindamycin triggered a stress response in S. aureus via alternative sigma factor B (σB). This correlated with elevated biofilm production and was specific for the S. aureus USA300 clonal lineage. Wong and colleagues now show that a subinhibitory concentration of clindamycin under nonbiofilm conditions triggered a similar transcriptional response in CA-MRSA ST30 strains, resulting in the upregulation of σB as well as agr and the PSMα genes. In a next step, it will be interesting to see whether S. aureus ST30 strains also display clindamycin-dependent biofilm induction, as we observed for USA300 LAC and two USA300 clinical isolates derived from skin and soft tissues infections. The VraSR two-component sysem (TCS) is activated by cell wall-active antibiotics as well as cell wall hydrolysis or cell wall synthesis inhibition and regulates the cell wall stress response (3–6). Wong and colleagues showed that inactivation of the VraSR TCS modulated the transcription of several genes of S. aureus subjected to a subinhibitory concentration of clindamycin. We showed that clindamycin induced the upregulation of the murein hydrolase AtlA and triggered changes in cell morphology (2), which may lead to cell wall stress in S. aureus. Thus, subinhibitory concentrations of clindamycin might trigger a cell wall stress response via the VraSR TCS. The increased expression of atlA that we observed in the biofilm after clindamycin addition may be balanced by the induction of the VraSR-dependent cell wall stress response, resulting in downregulation of atlA and upregulation of cell wall biosynthesis enzymes, counteracting cell lysis. Increased biofilm formation has previously been connected to cell wall stress induced by cell wall-active antibiotics in various studies (7–9). Further investigations will be necessary to clarify the role of the VraSR TCS in the S. aureus response to subinhibitory concentrations of clindamycin and its role in biofilm induction.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by Swiss National Foundation grant 310030_146295 to A.S.Z.
Footnotes
This is a response to a letter by Wong et al. (https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.02254-16).
REFERENCES
- 1.Wong CK, Zheng L, Ip M. 2017. Modulatory effects of a subinhibitory concentration of clindamycin in community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus strains of sequence type 30. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02254-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02254-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schilcher K, Andreoni F, Dengler Haunreiter V, Seidl K, Hasse B, Zinkernagel AS. 2016. Modulation of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm matrix by subinhibitory concentrations of clindamycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:5957–5967. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00463-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuroda M, Kuroda H, Oshima T, Takeuchi F, Mori H, Hiramatsu K. 2003. Two-component system VraSR positively modulates the regulation of cell-wall biosynthesis pathway in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol 49:807–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Utaida S, Dunman PM, Macapagal D, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Singh VK, Jayaswal RK, Wilkinson BJ. 2003. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the response of Staphylococcus aureus to cell-wall-active antibiotics reveals a cell-wall-stress stimulon. Microbiology 149:2719–2732. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26426-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dengler V, Meier PS, Heusser R, Berger-Bachi B, McCallum N. 2011. Induction kinetics of the Staphylococcus aureus cell wall stress stimulon in response to different cell wall active antibiotics. BMC Microbiol 11:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Dengler V, Meier PS, Heusser R, Kupferschmied P, Fazekas J, Friebe S, Staufer SB, Majcherczyk PA, Moreillon P, Berger-Bachi B, McCallum N. 2012. Deletion of hypothetical wall teichoic acid ligases in Staphylococcus aureus activates the cell wall stress response. FEMS Microbiol Lett 333:109–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02603.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kaplan JB, Izano EA, Gopal P, Karwacki MT, Kim S, Bose JL, Bayles KW, Horswill AR. 2012. Low levels of beta-lactam antibiotics induce extracellular DNA release and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 3:e00198-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00198-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mlynek KD, Callahan MT, Shimkevitch AV, Farmer JT, Endres JL, Marchand M, Bayles KW, Horswill AR, Kaplan JB. 2016. Effects of low-dose amoxicillin on Staphylococcus aureus USA300 biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:2639–2651. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02070-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Abdelhady W, Bayer AS, Seidl K, Moormeier DE, Bayles KW, Cheung A, Yeaman MR, Xiong YQ. 2014. Impact of vancomycin on sarA-mediated biofilm formation: role in persistent endovascular infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis 209:1231–1240. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
