Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1990 Jan;87(1):482–486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.1.482

Relation of spontaneous transformation in cell culture to adaptive growth and clonal heterogeneity.

A L Rubin 1, A Yao 1, H Rubin 1
PMCID: PMC53288  PMID: 2296603

Abstract

Cell transformation in culture is marked by the appearance of morphologically altered cells that continue to multiply to form discrete foci in confluent sheets when the surrounding cells are inhibited. These foci occur spontaneously in early-passage NIH 3T3 cells grown to confluency in 10% calf serum (CS) but are not seen in cultures grown to confluency in 2% CS. However, repeated passage of the cells at low density in 2% CS gives rise to an adapted population that grows to increasingly higher saturation densities and produces large numbers of foci in 2% CS. The increased saturation density of the adapted population in 2% CS is retained upon repeated passage in 10% CS, but the number and size of the foci produced in 2% CS gradually decrease under this regime. Clonal analysis confirms that the focus-forming potential of most if not all of the cells in a population increases in response to a continuously applied growth constraint, although only a small fraction of the population may actually form foci in a given assay. The acquired capacity for focus formation varies widely in clones derived from the adapted population and changes in diverse ways upon further passage of the clones. We propose that the adaptive changes result from progressive selection of successive phenotypic variations in growth capacity that occur spontaneously. The process designated progressive state selection resolves the apparent dichotomy between spontaneous mutation with selection on the one hand and induction on the other, by introducing selection among fluctuating states or metabolic patterns rather than among genetically altered cells.

Full text

PDF
482

Images in this article

484Image
on p.484
484Image
on p.484
484Image
on p.484
485Image
on p.485
485Image
on p.485
485Image
on p.485
485Image
on p.485

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aaronson S. A., Todaro G. J. Basis for the acquisition of malignant potential by mouse cells cultivated in vitro. Science. 1968 Nov 29;162(3857):1024–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3857.1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brouty-Boyé D., Gresser I., Baldwin C. Reversion of the transformed phenotype to the parental phenotype by subcultivation of X-ray-transformed C3H/10T1/2 cells at low cell density. Int J Cancer. 1979 Aug;24(2):253–260. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910240218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Elsasser W. M. Principles of a new biological theory: a summary. J Theor Biol. 1981 Mar 7;89(1):131–150. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90182-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Farber E. Pre-cancerous steps in carcinogenesis. Their physiological adaptive nature. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984;738(4):171–180. doi: 10.1016/0304-419x(83)90002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Farber E., Sarma D. S. Hepatocarcinogenesis: a dynamic cellular perspective. Lab Invest. 1987 Jan;56(1):4–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fox M., Radacic M. Adaptational origin of some purine-analogue resistant phenotypes in cultured mammalian cells. Mutat Res. 1978 Feb;49(2):275–296. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(78)90166-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Harris M., Collier K. Phenotypic evolution of cells resistant to bromodeoxyuridine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Jul;77(7):4206–4210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harris M. Induction of thymidine kinase in enzyme-deficient Chinese hamster cells. Cell. 1982 Jun;29(2):483–492. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90165-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heppner G. H. Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res. 1984 Jun;44(6):2259–2265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Meins F., Jr, Binns A. Epigenetic variation of cultured somatic cells: evidence for gradual changes in the requirement for factors promoting cell division. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Jul;74(7):2928–2932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.7.2928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mintz B., Illmensee K. Normal genetically mosaic mice produced from malignant teratocarcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3585–3589. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Noble R. L. Hormonal control of growth and progression in tumors of Nb rats and a theory of action. Cancer Res. 1977 Jan;37(1):82–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ogawa K., Solt D. B., Farber E. Phenotypic diversity as an early property of putative preneoplastic hepatocyte populations in liver carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1980 Mar;40(3):725–733. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ossowski L., Reich E. Changes in malignant phenotype of a human carcinoma conditioned by growth environment. Cell. 1983 Jun;33(2):323–333. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rabinowitz Z., Sachs L. The formation of variants with a reversion of properties of transformed cells. II. In vitro formation of variants from polyoma-transformed cells. Virology. 1969 Jun;38(2):343–346. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(69)90376-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rubin H., Chu B. M., Arnstein P. Dynamics of tumor growth and cellular adaptation after inoculation into nude mice of varying numbers of transformed 3T3 cells and of readaptation to culture of the tumor cells. Cancer Res. 1986 Apr;46(4 Pt 2):2027–2034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rubin H., Chu B. M., Arnstein P. Selection and adaptation for rapid growth in culture of cells from delayed sarcomas in nude mice. Cancer Res. 1987 Jan 15;47(2):486–492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rubin H., Chu B., Romerdahl C. Short-term fluctuations and long-term trends in anchorage-independent multiplication among cryopreserved subpopulations of a spontaneously transformed Balb/3T3 clone. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985 May;74(5):1059–1065. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rubin H. Uniqueness of each spontaneous transformant from a clone of BALB/c 3T3 cells. Cancer Res. 1988 May 1;48(9):2512–2518. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rubin H., Xu K. Evidence for the progressive and adaptive nature of spontaneous transformation in the NIH 3T3 cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Mar;86(6):1860–1864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shipley G. D., Ham R. G. Improved medium and culture conditions for clonal growth with minimal serum protein and for enhanced serum-free survival of Swiss 3T3 cells. In Vitro. 1981 Aug;17(8):656–670. doi: 10.1007/BF02628401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. TODARO G. J., GREEN H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol. 1963 May;17:299–313. doi: 10.1083/jcb.17.2.299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Uchida S., Green N., Coon H., Triche T., Mims S., Burg M. High NaCl induces stable changes in phenotype and karyotype of renal cells in culture. Am J Physiol. 1987 Aug;253(2 Pt 1):C230–C242. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1987.253.2.C230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES