Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2016 Nov 29;182:184–189.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.11.011

Molecular changes in children with heart failure undergoing LVAD therapy

Elizabeth Medina 1, Carmen C Sucharov 1, Penny Nelson 1, Shelley D Miyamoto 2, Brian L Stauffer 1,3
PMCID: PMC5328921  NIHMSID: NIHMS833171  PMID: 27908653

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether left ventricular assist device (LVAD) treatment in children with heart failure would result in modification of molecular pathways involved in HF pathophysiology.

Study design

Forty-seven explanted hearts from children were studied (16 non-failing control, 20 failing, and 11 failing post LVAD implantation (F-LVAD)). Protein expression and phosphorylation states were determined by receptor binding assays and western blots. mRNA expression was measured with Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. To evaluate for interactions and identify correlations, 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and regression analysis were performed.

Results

Treatment with LVAD resulted in recovery of total β-AR expression (Bmax) and β1-AR in failing hearts to normal levels (Bmax: 67.2±11.5 fmole/mg failing vs 99.5±27.7 fmole/mg non-failing, 104±38.7 fmole/mg F-LVAD, P≤0.01; β1-AR: 52.2±10.3 fmole/mg failing vs 83.0±23 fmole/mg non-failing, 76.5±32.1 fmole/mg F-LVAD P≤0.03). The high levels of G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 were returned to non-failing levels after LVAD treatment (5.6±9.0 failing vs 1.0±0.493 non-failing, 1.0±1.3 F-LVAD). Interestingly, β2-AR expression was significantly higher in F-LVAD (27.5±12; P<0.005) hearts compared with non-failing (16.4±6.1) and failing hearts (15.1±4.2). Phospholamban phosphorylation at serine 16 was significantly higher in F-LVAD (7.7±11.7) hearts compared with nonfailing (1.0±1.2, P=0.02) and failing (0.8±1.0, P=0.01). Also, atrial natriuretic factor (0.6±0.8) and brain natriuretic peptide (0.1±0.1) expression in F-LVAD was significantly lower compared with failing (2.8±3.6, P=0.01 and 0.6±0.7, P=0.02).

Conclusion

LVAD treatment in children with heart failure results in reversal of several pathologic myocellular processes and GRK2 may regulate β1-AR but not β2-AR expression in children with HF.

Keywords: β-adrenergic receptor, phospholamban, pathological gene program


The β-adrenergic pathway plays an essential role in the regulation of cardiac function. The two main receptors in the heart are the β1-adrenergic receptor (β1-AR) and the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR)1. In adults with heart failure, elevations in circulating catecholamines lead to chronic stimulation of β-ARs resulting in β1-AR down-regulation and desensitization due to an increase in receptor phosphorylation by the upregulated G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2)1.

During end-stage heart failure, mechanical circulatory devices such as left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are used as a form of therapy when drug treatments are no longer effective. Unloading the heart can lead to reverse remodeling such as improved calcium homeostasis and cycling in myocytes as well as alterations in gene expression in various components of the β-adrenergic system2.

Heart failure in children is not as common as in adults; therefore, there is a lack of focused research specific to this patient group. Previous work has demonstrated significant differences in the regulation of the β-adrenergic system and a number of downstream molecules suggesting that the molecular effects of heart failure and interventions in adults cannot be extrapolated to children35. There is also no evidence that drugs such as β-blockers are as efficacious when utilized for pediatric heart failure patients68. However, as seen in adults, there is an improvement in structure and function in pediatric hearts implanted with LVADs9, 10. A study on acute LVAD treatment of pediatric patients reveals that some genes are differentially regulated after 10 days of LVAD treatment; however, the study did not address changes in the GRK regulation of the β-adrenergic system, the pathologic gene program, or phosphorylation of its downstream targets11. These data suggest that there are functional and molecular changes occurring in pediatric hearts implanted with LVADs, and we therefore hypothesized that LVAD therapy will modify the β-AR system in children with heart failure. This study analyzes the molecular changes in the left ventricles of pediatric patients implanted with an LVAD and determines whether changes in GRK2 may underlie changes in β-AR expression.

Methods

Human subjects were males and females under the age of 17 years who donated their hearts to the pediatric transplant tissue bank at the University of Colorado. The study was approved by the institutional review committee and informed consent was obtained. Non-failing control hearts were donor hearts not transplanted for technical reasons. Explanted diseased hearts were from children suffering from advanced non-ischemic idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC) without or with an LVAD. A detailed description of the pediatric patients can be found in the Table (available at www.jpeds.com). At the time of cardiac transplantation, the explanted hearts were immediately cooled in ice cold oxygenated Tyrodes in the operating room. The left ventricle was rapidly dissected, flash frozen and stored at −80°C until further use. The failing and non-failing groups were age-matched as best as possible to failing patients treated with an LVAD (F-LVAD) a priori to mitigate any potential confounding between groups.

The Engel method was used with crude membrane preparations and [125I]-iodocyanopindolol (CYP) to determine total and β-AR subtype protein expression as previously published by our group3, 12.

Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) of the pathologic gene program was performed as previously described13. Primers have been previously published by our group3. Data were normalized to the expression of ribosomal RNA 18s.

Western blots were performed as previously described3, 14. GRK2 antibody (SC-562, 1:1000) & GAPDH (SC-20357, 1:10,000) were purchased from Santa Cruz Bio Tech. Phospholamban serine 16 (Ser16) (A010-12, 1:15,000) and threonine 17 (Thr17) (A010-13, 1:15,000) antibodies were purchased from Badrilla. Phospholamban total (05-205, 1:1000) antibody was purchased from Millipore. The HRP (115-035-146) anti-mouse and anti-rabbit secondaries were purchased from Jackson Laboratories. Antibodies were diluted in 1X TBS (20mM Tris 500mM NaCl pH 7.5) containing 5% BSA and 0.1% Tween. Blots were incubated overnight at 4°C.

Statistical analyses

The Shapiro-Wilk method was used to determine normality in all continuous data15. Data that was not normally distributed was log transformed and retested prior to analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Statview software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). To evaluate for interactions, 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed on all outcomes. Regression analysis was performed when indicated to identify correlations. Statistical significance was set to P<0.05 and all data are presented as mean ± SD (mean ± SEM in Figures 14). For log-transformed data, the mean and error measurements are given for the raw data for visual clarity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

β-AR density of non-failing, failing, failing hearts treated with an LVAD (F-LVAD). A) Bmax, total receptor density, B) β1-AR density, and C) β2-AR density. Total and β1-AR density in LVAD treated hearts is similar to non-failing levels. β2-AR density in LVAD treated hearts is significantly higher compared with nonfailing and failing levels.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pathologic gene program mRNA levels of non-failing, failing, and LVAD treated patients (F-LVAD). A) ANF and B) BNP levels are significantly decreased by LVAD treatment, and no change occurs in C) SERCA, D) α-MHC, and E) β-MHC. Normalized to 18s.

Results

The clinical characteristics of each cohort are described in the Table. Importantly, there was no significant difference in age between failing and F-LVAD or non-failing and F-LVAD patients; however, the non-failing cohort average age was higher than the failing patients (P=0.01). Although four different LVADs were used, the overwhelming majority of the devices were pulsatile flow Berlin Hearts and only two were continuous flow devices.

β-adrenergic receptor density

Total AR density (Bmax) in the failing hearts (67.2 ± 11.5 fmole/mg) was lower when compared with nonfailing (99.5 ± 27.7 fmole/mg, P=0.01); however, Bmax was similar to non-failing in F-LVAD patients (104.0 ± 38.7 fmole/mg) (Figure 1, A). Similar results were seen for the β1 receptor (non-failing 83.0 ± 23.0 fmole/mg; failing 52.2 ±10.3 fmole/mg; F-LVAD 76.5 ± 32.1 fmole/mg; non-failing to failing P=0.005 and F-LVAD to failing P=0.03) (Figure 1, B). β2-AR was significantly higher in F-LVAD patients (27.5 ± 12.0 fmole/mg, P<0.005) when compared with both nonfailing (16.4 ± 6.1 fmole/mg) and failing (15.0 ± 4.2 fmole/mg) (Figure 1, C).

GRK2 protein levels

GRK2 protein expression was significantly higher in the failing pediatric heart (5.6 ± 9.0, Figure 2). Expression in the F-LVAD group (1.0 ± 1.3) was significantly lower than the failing group and no different from GRK2 expression in the non-failing hearts (1.0 ± 0.493).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

GRK2 expression in pediatric non-failing (NF), failing (F), and failing hearts treated with an LVAD (F-LVAD, L) with representative Western blots. Blots were normalized to GAPDH. GRK2 expression levels in LVAD treated hearts are similar to non-failing.

Phospholamban phosphorylation

There was no significant difference in total phospholamban protein levels between the three groups (data not shown); however, there was significantly higher Ser16 phosphorylation (protein kinase A site) in F-LVAD treated patients (7.7 ± 11.7, P<0.05) compared with non-failing (1.0 ± 1.2) and failing (0.8 ± 1.0) (Figure 3, A). Although phosphorylation at Thr17 (the calcium calmodulin kinase II site) appeared lower in F-LVAD patients (0.6 ± 0.5), the change was not significant compared with nonfailing (1.0 ± 1.2) and failing (1.3 ± 1.7) patients (Figure 3, B). A regression analysis was performed to determine whether age, time on LVAD, medical therapy, β-AR density or GRK2 levels were responsible for the variability in phospholamban phosphorylation within this population, but no correlation was found (data not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Phospholamban Ser16 (Panel A) and Thr17 (Panel B) phosphorylation in pediatric non-failing, failing, and failing hearts treated with an LVAD (F-LVAD, L) with representative Western blots normalized to GAPDH. Phospholamban Ser16 phosphorylation is significantly higher in LVAD treated hearts compared with nonfailing and failing. (*) P<0.05. PLN, phospholamban.

Changes in pathologic gene program messengerRNA

Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) levels were significantly higher (P=0.03) in failing hearts (2.8 ± 3.6) compared with nonfailing (1.0 ± 1.8), but were similar between non-failing and F-LVAD patients (0.6 ± 0.8). Although there was no significant difference in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels between non-failing (1.0 ± 1.6) and failing hearts (0.6 ± 0.7), there was significantly less in F-LVAD hearts (0.1 ± 0.1) when compared with nonfailing (P=0.05) and failing (P=0.02) samples. Sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium transport ATPase (SERCA) and α-myosin heavy chain (α-MyHC), were both significantly lower in the failing hearts (SERCA: 0.4 ± 0.3; α-MyHC: 0.1 ± 0.1) compared with nonfailing (SERCA: 1.0 ± 0.7, P=0.03; α-MyHC: 1.0 ± 0.6, P<0.0001), and β-MyHC was significantly higher in the failing heart (1.5 ± 0.3) compared with nonfailing (1.0 ± 0.6, P=0.03). However, there was no effect of LVAD therapy, and expression of these genes remained significantly different from non-failing levels (SERCA: 0.3 ± 0.2, P=0.003; α-MyHC: 0.2 ± 0.2, P<0.0001; β-MyHC 1.6 ± 0.7, P=0.01).

Discussion

Mechanical circulatory support has become an important tool for heart failure treatment. Adjunctive therapies may be especially important for children because drug treatments lack the same efficacy as seen in adults and there are far fewer donor hearts available to children. Therefore, understanding the molecular remodeling produced with LVAD therapy in the failing pediatric heart is necessary. The current study demonstrates for the first time the effect of LVAD treatment on the β-adrenergic receptor expression, phospholamban phosphorylation, and the pathologic gene program of pediatric patients suffering from heart failure. Furthermore, our findings suggest that GRK2 may be responsible for regulation of the β1-AR, but not β2-AR in pediatric heart failure.

Both pulsatile and continuous flow LVADs in adult populations have been demonstrated to normalize total cardiac β-AR and β1-AR densities16, 17. Although limitations in our population do not allow us to definitively separate by LVAD type, total β-AR and β1-AR densities also approximate normal levels in children with heart failure after treatment with an LVAD. The broad range of treatment times in our population allowed us to perform a regression analysis (data not shown) that demonstrated a positive correlation between the number of days the patient was treated with changes in total β-AR and β1-AR densities. We have previously demonstrated unique age-dependent regulation of the β2-AR with heart failure in children3 and the data extends this finding into the LVAD treated population by demonstrating that β2-AR levels were significantly and substantially higher in LVAD hearts compared with both failing and nonfailing hearts. Because the β2-AR is thought to play a cardioprotective role in the heart18, a change in this receptor population may underlie age-differences in mechanisms of disease.

In adult heart failure there is an upregulation of GRK2 that correlates with the clinical severity of the disease19 and downregulation of the β1-AR. In adults, interventions that mitigate the disease process, such as β-blockers or LVADs lower GRK2 and increase β1-AR expression16, 20. Our results show that GRK2 levels are significantly higher in pediatric failing hearts, but return to non-failing levels in response to LVAD therapy and correlate with β1-AR expression providing novel evidence for a similar regulatory process in children. In contrast, the changes in GRK2 expression aren’t associated with the changes in β2-AR expression in pediatric patients, suggesting that a different mechanism is responsible for adaptations in this receptor.

Similar to milrinone therapy7 Ser16 phosphorylation is significantly higher in the F-LVAD group. The preservation of Ser16 phosphorylation in the absence of milrinone in the children with LVADs strongly suggests a positive remodeling process. In addition, and consistent with a positive remodeling process, ANF and BNP levels were significantly lower in the F-LVAD group than in the failing heart on medical therapy alone. These data are similar to the prior gene expression data in children11 and the response of the failing adult heart to LVAD therapy21. Improvement in the natriuretic peptides may be due to unloading of the left ventricle or positive remodeling.

There were several limitations to this study. First, there are limitations inherent to the cross-sectional study design. We have attempted to control for possible confounding factors through age-matching and limiting our failing population to IDCs. Second, because it is impossible to use “normal” hearts from children, brain dead donor hearts were utilized as non-failing controls for this study. Brain death can affect the heart22 however, it is important to note that any changes in AR activation would be more likely to bias our results against finding a difference. Third, there were four different types of LVADs used to treat patients in this study; however, the overwhelming majority (9/11) was the pulsatile Berlin Heart which makes the result most applicable to this device. A final concern is the potential heterogeneity within the IDC population, as demonstrated in Figure 3. Despite performing multiple correlations of various clinical variables such as patient medication profile, no correlations were identified to account for these results.

In conclusion, these studies provide the first insight into the molecular changes that occur in the β-adrenergic pathway, phospholamban phosphorylation, and pathologic gene program in LVAD treated pediatric failing hearts. These changes are most likely due to unloading of the heart. Importantly, these results suggest that GRK2 may be a regulatory mechanism for the β1-AR but not the β2-AR in the failing pediatric heart. These changes are indicative of reverse remodeling and suggest that LVADs may have the potential to be used as pathway to recovery. Additional studies will be important to determine whether any of these findings can be utilized as biomarkers of myocardial recovery or as a means of identifying novel medical adjunctive therapies to promote ventricular recovery and device explant in this population.

Table 1.

Pediatric subjects characteristics

Characteristics NF F F-LVAD
Number in cohort 16 20 11
Male, n (%) 9 (56) 10 (50) (P=0.7) 6 (54) (P=0.9)
Mean age at tissue collection (years) 11 ± 5 6 ± 6 (P=0.01) 7 ± 6 (P=0.08)
Mean days on LVAD (range) 71(12–210)
Type of LVAD (n) Berlin Heart (8)
Thoratec LVAD (1)
Pedimag (1)
Heartware HVAD (1)
Mean EF ±SD (%) 49 ±15 18 ± 8 (P=0.0004)
Milrinone, n (%) 10 (50) 3 (19)
PDE5 inhibitor, n (%)* 4 (36)
Beta-blocker, n (%) 2 (13) 4 (20) 4 (36)
ACE inhibitor, n (%) 18 (90) 3 (27)
Non-PDEi Inotrope, n (%) 9 (56) 3 (15) 1 (9)

NF, non-failing; F, Failing; F-LVAD, failing patients treated with an LVAD; M, male; EF, ejection fraction; SD, standard deviation; PDE, phosphodiesterase; PDEi, phosphodiesterase inhibitor and ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme.

*

PDE5 inhibitor, sildenafil or tadalafil.

Non-PDEi Inotropes include: dopamine, dobutamine, epinephrine, & norepinephrine. P-values are compared to non-failing.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Children’s Hospital Colorado Heart Transplant Team for their contributions to this work.

Supported by the Millisor Chair in Pediatric Heart Disease, Boedecker Foundation, Boulder, CO, the Nair family, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; R21HL113846, R01HL126928 [both to S.M.], R01HL107715 [to B.S.], R21HL097123 [to S.M., B.S., C.S.]), and NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Colorado (UL1 TR001082). E.M. was supported by NIH NHLBI (R01HL107715-01A1S1 [to B.S.]). Contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views. B.S. has received support from Forest Laboratories, Inc, and Stealth Biotherapeutics. C.S. has received equity in Miragen, Inc. S.M., B.S., and E.M. have received equity in Coramir Biomedical, Inc.

Abbreviations

LVAD

Left ventricular assist device

F-LVAD

Failing post LVAD implantation

β-AR

β-adrenergic receptor

Bmax

Total β-adrenergic receptor expression

GRK2

G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2

SERCA

Sarcoendoplasmic reticulum calcium transport ATPase

α-MyHC

α-myosin heavy chain

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Edited by Steinberger and WFB

No reprints needed.

P.N. declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Lohse MJ, Engelhardt S, Eschenhagen T. What is the role of beta-adrenergic signaling in heart failure? Circ Res. 2003;93:896–906. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000102042.83024.CA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall JL, Fermin DR, Birks EJ, Barton PJ, Slaughter M, Eckman P, et al. Clinical, molecular, and genomic changes in response to a left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:641–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Miyamoto SD, Stauffer BL, Nakano S, Sobus R, Nunley K, Nelson P, et al. Beta-adrenergic adaptation in paediatric idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:33–41. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nakano SJ, Miyamoto SD, Movsesian M, Nelson P, Stauffer BL, Sucharov CC. Age-related differences in phosphodiesterase activity and effects of chronic phosphodiesterase inhibition in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8:57–63. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Stauffer BL, Russell G, Nunley K, Miyamoto SD, Sucharov CC. miRNA expression in pediatric failing human heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;57:43–6. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Towbin JA, Lowe AM, Colan SD, Sleeper LA, Orav EJ, Clunie S, et al. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of dilated cardiomyopathy in children. JAMA. 2006;296:1867–76. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shaddy RE, Boucek MM, Hsu DT, Boucek RJ, Canter CE, Mahony L, et al. Carvedilol for children and adolescents with heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;298:1171–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.10.1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kantor PF, Abraham JR, Dipchand AI, Benson LN, Redington AN. The impact of changing medical therapy on transplantation-free survival in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1377–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zimmerman H, Covington D, Smith R, Copeland J. Mechanical support and medical therapy reverse heart failure in infants and children. Artif Organs. 2010;34:885–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01069.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ihnat CL, Zimmerman H, Copeland JG, Meaney FJ, Sobonya RE, Larsen BT, et al. Left ventricular assist device support as a bridge to recovery in young children. Congenit Heart Dis. 2011;6:234–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00494.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mohapatra B, Vick GW, 3rd, Fraser CD, Jr, Clunie SK, Towbin JA, Sinagra G, et al. Short-term mechanical unloading and reverse remodeling of failing hearts in children. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010;29:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Engel G, Hoyer D, Berthold R, Wagner H. (+/−)[125Iodo] cyanopindolol, a new ligand for beta-adrenoceptors: identification and quantitation of subclasses of beta-adrenoceptors in guinea pig. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 1981;317:277–85. doi: 10.1007/BF00501307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sucharov CC, Dockstader K, McKinsey TA. YY1 protects cardiac myocytes from pathologic hypertrophy by interacting with HDAC5. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:4141–53. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sucharov CC, Mariner P, Long C, Bristow M, Leinwand L. Yin Yang 1 is increased in human heart failure and represses the activity of the human alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:31233–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301917200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shapiro S, Wilk M. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika. 1965;52:591–611. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hata JA, Williams ML, Schroder JN, Lima B, Keys JR, Blaxall BC, et al. Lymphocyte levels of GRK2 (betaARK1) mirror changes in the LVAD-supported failing human heart: lower GRK2 associated with improved beta-adrenergic signaling after mechanical unloading. J Card Fail. 2006;12:360–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Milting H, Scholz C, Arusoglu L, Freitag M, Cebulla R, Jaquet K, et al. Selective upregulation of beta1-adrenergic receptors and dephosphorylation of troponin I in end-stage heart failure patients supported by ventricular assist devices. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2006;41:441–50. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2006.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bernstein D, Fajardo G, Zhao M, Urashima T, Powers J, Berry G, et al. Differential cardioprotective/cardiotoxic effects mediated by beta-adrenergic receptor subtypes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H2441–9. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00005.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aguero J, Almenar L, Monto F, Oliver E, Sanchez-Lazaro I, Vicente D, et al. Myocardial G protein receptor-coupled kinase expression correlates with functional parameters and clinical severity in advanced heart failure. J Card Fail. 2012;18:53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2011.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Leineweber K, Rohe P, Beilfuss A, Wolf C, Sporkmann H, Bruck H, et al. G-protein-coupled receptor kinase activity in human heart failure: effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;66:512–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuhn M, Voss M, Mitko D, Stypmann J, Schmid C, Kawaguchi N, et al. Left ventricular assist device support reverses altered cardiac expression and function of natriuretic peptides and receptors in end-stage heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;64:308–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Apostolakis E, Parissis H, Dougenis D. Brain death and donor heart dysfunction: implications in cardiac transplantation. J Card Surg. 2010;25:98–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2008.00790.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES