Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nephron Clin Pract. 2013 Mar 1;122(1-2):9–16. doi: 10.1159/000347143

Painless myocardial ischemia is associated with mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease

James B Wetmore 1, Mike Broce 2, Amer Malas 3, Ammar Almehmi 4
PMCID: PMC5330086  NIHMSID: NIHMS481633  PMID: 23466572

Abstract

Background

Painless myocardial ischemia (PMI) is associated with poor outcomes in the general population. We hypothesized that presence of PMI is inversely related to level of kidney function and is associated with impaired survival in CKD.

Methods

A total of 356 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention were assessed for PMI, defined as the absence of chest pain in response to balloon dilation of the affected vessel. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate 10-year all-cause mortality.

Results

There was an increase in PMI occurrence by strata of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), whereby PMI was present in only 20.6% of individuals with eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73m2 but was found in 50.0% of individuals with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 (P = 0.004 for trend). Classification of individuals as having either CKD or PMI showed significant differences in adjusted mortality between groups (P < 0.001 for trend), with individuals having both CKD and PMI demonstrating the highest 10-year mortality. Compared to individuals with neither CKD nor PMI, individuals with CKD and no PMI had a hazard ratio (HR) for mortality of 1.64 (95% confidence intervals 1.03 – 2.63, P = 0.038), while individuals with both PMI and CKD had a HR of 2.08 (1.30 – 3.33, P = 0.002).

Conclusion

PMI is common in CKD population, is inversely related to the level of eGFR, and confers substantially increased risk in CKD. These findings may partially explain the high mortality traditionally attributed to cardiovascular disease in CKD patients.

Keywords: coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia, chronic kidney disease, mortality

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), accounting for nearly half of all deaths [1, 2]. A large proportion of these fatalities is attributed to sudden cardiac death (SCD) [3], which is presumed to take the form of abrupt catastrophic ventricular arrhythmias. Patients with advanced CKD may be particularly susceptible to SCD; for example 62% of cardiac deaths in chronic dialysis patients the United States Renal Data System database are ascribed to arrhythmic mechanisms [4]. Arrhythmias appear to be relatively common in CKD patients when 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiography is employed, with some studies demonstrating that individuals with renal impairment not on dialysis have an increased prevalence of complex ventricular arrhythmias compared to individuals without renal disease [5]. Further, increased arrhythmic activity appears to be associated with a high prevalence of painless myocardial ischemia (PMI) in patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), compared to individuals with intact kidney function [5], suggesting that PMI may be an underlying cause of arrhythmias and, as such, a major contributor to CVD mortality.

Several studies in the general population have shown that the presence of PMI may be more common than “traditional” symptomatic angina and that PMI is associated with particularly poor outcomes [6, 7]. Thus, understanding the importance of PMI and how it may contribute to CVD in at-risk populations, such as those with CKD, is imperative. PMI is well-documented in the dialysis population [8-11], and indeed the hemodialysis procedure itself it associated with regional wall motion abnormalities and alterations in myocardial perfusion [12]; however, very limited data are available on the prevalence of PMI and its prognostic implications in the CKD population [5]. In the present study, we sought to determine the frequency of PMI occurrence in non-dialysis CKD patients undergoing coronary angioplasty of native coronary vessels, and to investigate the association between PMI, CKD, and mortality during long term follow-up. We hypothesized that the occurrence of provokable PMI is associated both with the stage of CKD and with particularly poor outcomes in patients with CKD.

Subjects and Methods

Participants

In this retrospective cohort study, we studied a total of 356 consecutive patients who underwent percutanous coronary intervention (PCI) on native coronary vessels by a single operator between January 1999 and December 2001. We carefully selected our cohort using the following rationale. First, since our goal was to gain insights into the relationship between PMI and (non-dialysis) CKD, we sought to study only patients who were not on dialysis. Second, we sought to study coronary disease which was both advanced but potentially remediable, so candidates had to undergo PCI. Finally, since previously-bypassed patients differ in important ways from patients with de novo coronary disease [13, 14], we studied only individuals undergoing PCI on native vessels.

This registry was created and employed prospectively, with predefined domains of data collection applied to each enrollee. All patients underwent coronary artery stenting as clinically indicated; indications were pain thought to be likely of cardiac origin, shortness of breath, worsening heart failure, unstable angina, positive exercise stress test, or acute myocardial infarction. Patients with at least one available baseline creatinine value were included in the study. To enhance generalizability and reflect real-world clinical practice in the setting of PCI, study criteria were deliberately broad; exclusion criteria were only dialysis dependence or intervention on non-native vessels.

Data on demographics, cardiac risk factors, and laboratory results were obtained from the Charleston Area Medical Research Institution cardiac catheterization laboratory database and from other medical records. Operational definitions are as follows. Participants were considered to have previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) if he or she had prior myocardial infarction, PCI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, peripheral vascular disease, or history of congestive heart failure not due to valvular disease. Diabetes was defined by the presence of a fasting blood glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or a requirement for insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents; dyslipidemia by a total cholesterol level > 200 mg/dl, low density lipoprotein (LDL) level > 100 mg/dl, or use of an anti-hyperlipidemic agent; hypertension by systolic blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg at time of enrollment in the database, or use of antihypertensive medications; smoking by use of tobacco currently or within the past 6 months.

Stenotic lesions that reduced the coronary artery lumen by 50% or more on coronary angiogram were considered significant for this study. A standard conscious sedation protocol using midazolam (1-2 mg) and fentanyl (50-200mcg) was utilized in all coronary interventions; at all times the patient remained sufficiently alert to answer questions and respond to instruction.

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Charleston Area Medical Center. At all times, principles of the Declarations of Helsinki were adhered to.

Estimation of glomerular filtration rate

The abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation was used to estimate GFR [15]. The baseline creatinine on the day of admission was utilized. The National Kidney Foundation classification system was used to categorize individuals with CKD into respective stages according to level of eGFR [16]. Participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were considered to have CKD.

Definition of painless myocardial ischemia

Ischemia, which is traditionally classified as either painful or painless, can be induced when balloon angioplasty interrupts blood supply to cardiac tissue perfused by that artery [17-19]. Painless myocardial ischemia can be identified either as a transient abnormality of the electrocardiogram documented on ambulatory monitor in the absense of angina or, in this case, as the absense of chest pain on cornary angiopasty during actual balloon inflation [8, 9, 20, 21]. PMI was defined as the absence of chest pain (angina) or its equivalent (such as arm, throat, or jaw pain) in response to balloon dilatation in at least one affected vessel during PCI. A single operator consistently performed the intervention, while a nurse, who was not informed about the CKD status of the patient, queried the patient in standardized language about the presence of or absence of any pain during PCI.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± one standard deviation (SD) for continuous variables and as proportions for categorical variables. The follow-up data were obtained by reviewing the electronic medical records and the catheterization laboratory database. Regarding demographics, information on race was not included in this analysis as non-Caucasians were < 2% of the study population, reflective of the racial distribution in West Virginia, U.S.A. For the outcome analysis, participants were followed from the day of PCI until either death, the end of study (September 1, 2009), or loss to follow-up, at which point data were censored. The mortality data was ascertained by accessing the U.S. Social Security Death Index in September 2009.

Differences between participants with and without PMI and CKD were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test for categorical data, the unpaired t-test for continuous normally-distributed data, and the Mann-Whitney test for non-normally-distributed data. Because follow-up times were not uniform, Cox proportional hazards (PH) were employed for survival analysis. Cox PH modeling was used to create survival curves and detect resultant differences among the four groups of participants (i.e., the 2 × 2 matrix based on the presence or absence of PMI and CKD). The following variables were used for adjustment in modeling: age, gender, specific cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and smoking), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cardiac medications (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors or “statins”, β- blockers, and ACE inhibitors). Cox PH curves are presented as a figure, accompanied by the hazard ratios (HRs) of the relevant variables in tabular form. Finally, to test the robustness of our results, a sensitivity analysis was then performed in which we increased the threshold for CKD by lowering the eGFR to 40 mL/min/1.73 m2; this was done deliberately to increase the specificity of a diagnosis of presumed CKD. All analyses and calculations were conducted using SPSS statistical package version 15.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). A P -value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics

A total of 356 participants who underwent PCI demonstrated significant coronary artery disease. Figure 1 depicts the classification of participants by the presence or absence of CKD and PMI. Individuals with neither CKD nor PMI constituted the largest group (52.8%), while the group with PMI and CKD was the smallest at 12.6%. The distribution according to eGFR level was as follows: 16 (4.5%) participants had eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2; 88 (24.7%) had eGFR 30-59 mL/min/1.73 m2; 152 (42.7%) had eGFR 60-89 mL/min/1.73 m2; and 100 (28.1%) had eGFR > 90 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Classification of participants by presence of chronic kidney disease and painless myocardial ischemia.

PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PMI, painless myocardial ischemia.

CKD defined as eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2.

Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mean age was 64.6 years, and 64.0% were males. Patients with both CKD and PMI had higher absolute rates of diabetes and hypertension compared to the other groups. Individuals with both CKD and PMI, as expected, also had the highest absolute mean serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels, as well as a lower eGFRs, resulting in significant trends across groups.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics stratified by chronic kidney disease and painless myocardial ischemia status.

Variable Total no CKD/no PMI no CKD/PMI CKD/no PMI CKD/PMI P-value
n = 356 (100%) n = 188 (52.8%) n = 64 (18%) n = 59 (16.6%) n = 45 (12.6%)
Age, years 64.6 ± 12.0 60.4 ± 11.3 64.9 ± 11.7 70.8 ± 10.5 73.3 ± 9.0 < 0.001
Male, n (%) 228 (64.0) 120 (63.8) 54 (84.4) 27 (45.8) 27 (60.0) < 0.001
Risk factors, n (%)
 Diabetes 124 (34.8) 61 (32.4) 15 (23.4) 27 (45.8) 21 (46.7) 0.018
 Hypertension 258 (72.5) 125 (66.5) 45 (70.3) 49 (83.1) 39 (86.7) 0.01
 Dyslipidemia 286 (80.3) 154 (81.9) 52 (81.3) 46 (78.0) 34 (75.6) 0.76
 Smoking 110 (30.9) 75 (39.9) 21 (32.8) 8 (13.6) 6 (13.3) < 0.001
COPD, n (%) 104 (29.2) 44 (23.4) 21 (32.8) 20 (33.9) 19 (42.2) 0.051
Cardiac medications, n (%)
 β- blocker 174 (48.9) 91 (48.4) 27 (42.2) 37 (62.7) 19 (42.2) 0.09
 ACE inhibitor 133 (37.4) 70 (37.2) 21 (38.2) 24 (40.7) 18 (40.0) 0.80
 Statin 181 (50.8) 96 (51.1) 28 (43.8) 34 (57.6) 23 (51.1) 0.497
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 141 ± 26 140 ± 27 137 ± 22 143 ± 25 145 ± 25 0.234
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 76 ± 14 78 ± 15 76 ± 13 73 ± 12 70 ± 14 0.009
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL) 105.1 ± 34.15 109.2 ± 33.8 106.8 ± 33.7 98.3 ± 32.9 93.4 ± 35.1 0.025
Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) 19.5 ± 9.9 15.3 ± 5.0 16.9 ± 4.8 27.3 ± 11.7 30.5 ± 13.6 < 0.001
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 1.14 ± 0.84 0.87 ± 0.20 0.94 ± 0.18 1.62 ± 1.16 1.88 ± 1.55 < 0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) 76.4 ± 2.9 91.1 ± 2.4 85.9 ± 2.1 45.7 ± 1.3 43.2 ± 2.9 < 0.001

Continuous data shown as mean ± one standard deviation. CKD defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m².

CKD, chronic kidney disease; PMI, silent myocardial ischemia; COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ACE, angiotensin converting enzyme; LDL, low density lipoprotein; statin, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Frequency of PMI

PMI was more frequent in the CKD patients compared to those who had no CKD, 43.3% vs. 25.4% (P = 0.001). As shown in Figure 2, the frequency of PMI increased as the level of eGFR decreased: for example, in participants with eGFR ≥ 90.0 mL/min/1.73m2, PMI was present in 20.6%, while in individuals with eGFR < 30.0 mL/min/1.73m2, the rate was fully 50.0% (Ptrend = 0.004).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Percent of participants with painless myocardial ischemia by strata of estimated glomerular filtration rate, in ml/min/1.73 m².

P – value represents chi-square test for trend. eGFR values are in mL/min/1.73m2.

PMI, painless myocardial ischemia; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Survival by strata of CKD and PMI

The maximum follow-up period was 10 years, while the mean follow-up time was 7.3 ± 2.7 years. A total of 143 participants died during the 10-year follow-up period; 213 participants survived. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards survival curves are shown in Figure 3. Overall, mortality increased as disease burden increased: cumulative survival percentages for all-cause mortality at 10 years were 62.0% for individuals with neither CKD nor PMI, 45.2% for individuals with PMI but intact renal function, 37.0% for individuals with CKD but no PMI, and 23.7% for individuals with both CKD and PMI. These survival rates differed significantly across groups (overall P < 0.001).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Adjusted all-cause mortality in participants with and without painless myocardial ischemia and chronic kidney disease.

PMI, painless myocardial ischemia; CKD, chronic kidney disease

Next, factors associated with mortality were modeled. After adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics and risk factors (as listed in Table 1), age, hyperlipidemia, and COPD were significantly associated with mortality (P ≤ 0.004 for each), while diabetes displayed a marginal effect (P = 0.17); this is shown in Table 2. A significant interactive effect was found between CKD and PMI: compared to individuals with neither CKD nor PMI, CKD (in the absence of PMI) had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.64 (95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.03 – 2.63, P = 0.038), while the simultaneous presence of both PMI and CKD increased the magnitude and significance of the HR to 2.08 (1.30 – 3.33, P = 0.002).

Table 2.

Cox Proportional hazards ratios for factors associated with all-cause mortality.

Variable HR 95% CI P-value
Age, per year 1.04 1.03 – 1.06 < 0.001
Dyslipidemia 0.42 0.27 – 0.65 < 0.001
Diabetes 1.27 0.90 – 1.79 0.17
COPD 1.64 1.17 – 2.30 0.004
CKD-PMI interaction
 No CKD/No PMI 1 – –
 CKD/No PMI 1.64 1.03 – 2.63 0.038
 PMI/No CKD 1.49 0.93 – 2.39 0.098
 CKD & PMI 2.08 1.30 – 3.33 0.002

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence intervals; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CKD, chronic kidney disease; PMI, painless myocardial ischemia

To reduce the risk that CKD was being misclassified as acute kidney injury, we tested the robustness of our results by invoking a more stringent definition of CKD. CKD was redefined as having an eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2. In this analysis, we found a distinct effect of PMI, such that, compared to individuals with neither condition, PMI (in the absence of CKD) now demonstrated a HR of 1.58 (1.08 – 2.29, P = 0.017). The effect of simultaneous PMI and CKD was now somewhat stronger than before with a HR of 2.61, although this was accompanied by somewhat wider confidence intervals (1.18 – 5.79, P = 0.018).

Finally, to further explore our data, we examined the differences in the severity of coronary artery disease (i.e., the number of the affected vessels), the number of stents deployed and the duration of balloon inflation as potential confounding factors. We found no significant differences in any of these among the four groups, as shown in the Supplementary Table.

Discussion

In this study, we sought to determine whether the occurrence of PMI was greater in CKD patients than in individuals with intact renal function, and to examine the effect of PMI on mortality, independent of important traditional risk factors such as diabetes, in patients with CKD. We found a graded increase in the occurrence of PMI as the degree of renal impairment worsened, as well as a strong independent effect CKD on long-term survival in individuals with proven coronary artery disease. PMI appeared to potentiate the risk conferred by CKD in the primary analysis, and was frankly significant in our sensitivity analysis. Indeed, in the primary analysis individuals with the combination of both CKD and PMI had a roughly 2.1-fold-mortality risk over the ensuing decade compared to individuals with neither disorder, while the presence of CKD alone conferred a risk of roughly 1.6. These results suggest that the presence of PMI in CKD confers additional risk beyond that of CKD alone, and therefore that PMI could be an important marker of increased all-cause mortality in patients with CKD.

Our findings that PMI may contribute to mortality are broadly concordant with other studies. For example, Deedwania et al evaluated the effect of PMI on mortality in 107 patients with stable angina, but with unknown renal function, and demonstrated a significant 3-fold increase in cardiac deaths in patients with PMI compared to those without PMI over a mean follow-up of 2 years [7]. Other studies report more widely varying risk estimates, which may be due to differences in the patient populations and clinical scenarios examined (e.g., unstable angina as the presenting symptom) [6, 22]. In another important observational analysis drawn from the Worchester Heart Attack Study, Sosnov et al analyzed the symptoms of myocardial infarction and their relationships to CKD. A finding of substantial interest was that patients with kidney disease were less likely to report chest pain compared to those without kidney disease. The authors concluded that kidney disease might change the perception of acute coronary disease [23].

However, relatively little work has been done to rigorously examine the effects of both PMI and CKD on long-term survival. One such report is that of Aronow et al, which demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of PMI in elderly patients with creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL, compared to those with creatinine < 1.2 mg/dL (27% vs. 11%, P = 0.006) [5]. While that important study appears to be the first to suggest that occurrence of PMI may be associated with the presence of CKD, it was limited by its small sample size and modest duration of follow up, limitations remedied by the present investigation.

The mechanisms that underlie lack of ischemic symptoms in some patients, as well as the reasons why PMI is more common in individuals with CKD, are not well understood; several hypotheses, however, posit that these issues may be linked. One such hypothesis invokes left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which is common even in the early stages of CKD [24]. The development of LVH is associated with structural changes in the heart, resulting in myocyte-capillary mismatch which predisposes cardiomyocytes to hypoxia [25]. LV structural changes can also disrupt the precise patterning of cardiac innervation leading to altered neural activation and fatal ventricular arrhythmias [26, 27]. Another important mechanism proposes that a micro-inflammatory state, commonly seen in CKD patients, is responsible for PMI [28]. Indeed, accumulating evidence suggests that perception of angina is closely related to the micro-environmental balance between pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as the interleukins (IL) IL-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α, and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10 [29]. Regardless of the mechanism(s) responsible, it appears likely that PMI increases the ventricular arrhythmogenic activity and consequent cardiovascular death, particularly in vulnerable individuals such as those with CKD [5, 30].

Of note, the risk conferred by diabetes was of only marginal statistical significance. This is not necessarily surprising given that conflicting evidence exists regarding the prevalence and clinical importance of PMI in diabetic patients. While some reports demonstrated a higher occurrence of PMI in diabetics compared to non-diabetics [31], others documented a higher or similar prevalence of symptomatic ischemia in diabetic and non-diabetic populations [32, 33]. Importantly, Wackers et al reported that the lack of classical anginal symptoms in diabetics is not related to the traditional or the emerging cardiac risk factors [34], and that autonomic dysfunction appears to be a strong predictor of PMI [34, 35]. While autonomic dysfunction is not confined to diabetics (occurring, for example, in patients with vascular calcification), given discrepancies in the literature about the association between PMI and diabetes we were concerned that the latter could confound the effects of PMI on mortality, i.e., that adjustment for diabetes would attenuate the influence of PMI on the outcome. The fact that this was not observed in our analysis suggests the possibility that autonomic dysfunction may not fully explain the PMI observed in diabetes, or that autonomic dysfunction is also present in non-diabetic patients via other mechanisms. Much further work remains to be done in this area, particularly in individuals with CKD.

We acknowledge several important limitations to our study. Most fundamentally, our goals were circumscribed; as such, our findings may not be generalizable to the wider population. Specifically, our goal was to gain insights into the effect that CKD has on the occurrence of PMI in individuals with remediable native lesions. Since dialysis patients or patients with symptoms attributable to diseased bypass grafts differ from non-dialysis patients with primary disease of the native vessels, our findings are probably limited to a restricted population of patients. Second, although data were prospectively collected, the analysis of the data was retrospective. Third, given the goals of the study, presence of a baseline creatinine was required for study inclusion, and thus patients without a baseline creatinine value were not solicted for participation; this represented < 5% of patients, and no data was collected on them. We believe this is only a modest limitation, however, since the vast majority of patients who undergo PCI have a pre-procedural creatinine assessed. Fourth, recent creatinine values might not truly be reflective of CKD. That is, a patient could be experiencing acute kidney injury (AKI) contemporaneously with the cardiac catheterization. This could potentially result in misclassification of AKI as CKD, but in our experience major AKI prior to catheterization is fairly rare, and the effect of misclassification would have to be very large to completely undermine our results. We attempted to address this with our sensitivity analysis, in which we restricted the definition of CKD to individuals having an eGFR < 40 mL/min/1.73 m2; reassuringly, the results were generally concordant with the findings of the primary analysis. It is also possible that residual confounding might still be present between potential risk factors an our outcome of interest: for example, we lack data on potential risk factors such as cardiac ejection fraction and albuminuria, both of which independently predict mortality while contributing to both renal and cardiac dysfunction [15, 36].

We also acknowledge that the clearance of opiod analgesics decreases as GFR falls [37]; while this could result in misclassification (i.e., CKD patients with symptomatic myocardial ischemia could be misclassified as painless), a single operator using an established protocol makes it less likely that variation in pain treatment practices substantially confounds our results. Further, patients more likely to have PMI might be expected to receive less overall pain medication, which could work to counterbalance the alterated pharmacokinetics in CKD. A more rigorously analytical approach would universally fix the amount of pain medication administered, but such a study would pose considerable ethical challenges.

Finally, we also cannot rule out the possibility that the absence of overt chest pain may, paradoxically, be a surrogate for more severe coronary artery disease. Our goal, however, was to perform the first long-term study in a substantial number of patients in order to establish the potential risks of PMI and CKD and to generate hypotheses critical to informing future, more comprehensive, efforts. As useful future assessment would be electrocardiographic recordings during PCI, which could yield insights about the relationship between PMI and ST-segment changes [17]. Collectively, however, the limitations of this study are probably counterbalanced by the substantial number of patients studied, the long duration of follow-up, and the fact that a single operator recorded symptoms in rigorously systematic fashion utilizing the framework of prospectively-designed registry.

It is important that our work be considered in its appropriate historical context. The last decade has witnessed dramatic changes in how PCI is used in clinical practice [38-41], which is reflected in evolving guidelines [42]. The increasing use of drug-eluting stents as well as refinement in the optimal use of antiplatelet therapy [38-40, 42] mean that the long-term outcomes we report might differ were our study to be conducted today. Indeed, even the selection of appropriate PCI candidates may be changing, with an emerging belief that individuals with single vessel disease outside of the left anterior descending artery may not warrant PCI or even diagnostic catheterization [41]. However, the purpose of our study was to make foundational observations about how the perception of chest pain might vary by CKD status, a study which could only be performed in individuals who were, at the time, thought to be appropriate candidates for PCI with concomitant balloon occlusion. Comparable work should be performed in the present era to further inform the community on this important issue.

In conclusion, this is the first long-term study demonstrating that PMI is related to the degree of CKD and that the presence of PMI in CKD confers a risk greater than that of CKD alone. Although a full understanding of the molecular mechanisms contributing to PMI remains to be elucidated, PMI may be a key process in the disproportionate incidence of death attributed to arrhythmia in patients with CKD. Further studies are needed to assess the prevalence of PMI at different levels of eGFR in a prospective manner using screening modalities such as nuclear cardiac imaging, as well as to investigate the potential benefit of early intervention in patients with both PMI and CKD.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Table. Numbers of diseased coronary vessels and stents placed at time of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to James Vacek, MD, for helpful discussions about the manuscript, and to Ms. Alesa Martin for her technical assistance.

Funding: Support for this work was provided by NIH T32 training grant DK 071496 and National Kidney Foundation Renal Fellow Research Fellowship (A.A.).

Footnotes

Disclosures: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  • 1.Jaar BG, Coresh J, Plantinga LC, et al. Comparing the risk for death with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in a national cohort of patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:174–183. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-3-200508020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN, Collins AJ. The differential impact of risk factors on mortality in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 2004;66:2389–2401. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.66028.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pun PH, Smarz TR, Honeycutt EF, et al. Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased risk of sudden cardiac death among patients with coronary artery disease. Kidney Int. 2009;76:652–658. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Herzog CA, Mangrum JM, Passman R. Sudden cardiac death and dialysis patients. Semin Dial. 2008;21:300–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aronow WS, Ahn C, Mercando AD, Epstein S. Prevalence of coronary artery disease, complex ventricular arrhythmias, and silent myocardial ischemia and incidence of new coronary events in older persons with chronic renal insufficiency and with normal renal function. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:1142–1143. A1149. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01176-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gottlieb SO, Weisfeldt ML, Ouyang P, Mellits ED, Gerstenblith G. Silent ischemia as a marker for early unfavorable outcomes in patients with unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:1214–1219. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198605083141903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Deedwania PC, Carbajal EV. Silent ischemia during daily life is an independent predictor of mortality in stable angina. Circulation. 1990;81:748–756. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.81.3.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mohi-ud-din K, Bali HK, Banerjee S, Sakhuja V, Jha V. Silent myocardial ischemia and high-grade ventricular arrhythmias in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Ren Fail. 2005;27:171–175. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Narula AS, Jha V, Bali HK, Sakhuja V, Sapru RP. Cardiac arrhythmias and silent myocardial ischemia during hemodialysis. Ren Fail. 2000;22:355–368. doi: 10.1081/jdi-100100879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McIntyre CW, Burton JO, Selby NM, et al. Hemodialysis-induced cardiac dysfunction is associated with an acute reduction in global and segmental myocardial blood flow. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;3:19–26. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03170707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dasselaar JJ, Slart RH, Knip M, et al. Haemodialysis is associated with a pronounced fall in myocardial perfusion. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:604–610. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfn501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Assa S, Hummel YM, Voors AA, et al. Hemodialysis-induced regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction: prevalence, patient and dialysis treatment-related factors, and prognostic significance. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012;7:1615–1623. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00850112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yamamuro M, Lytle BW, Sapp SK, et al. Risk factors and outcomes after coronary reoperation in 739 elderly patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:464–474. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)01076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Morrison DA, Sethi G, Sacks J, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: The VA AWESOME multicenter registry: comparison with the randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:266–273. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01720-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S1–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gutterman DD. Silent myocardial ischemia. Circ J. 2009;73:785–797. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-1209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cohn PF, Fox KM, Daly C. Silent myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2003;108:1263–1277. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000088001.59265.EE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cleman M, Wohlgelernter D, Cabin H, et al. Myocardial dysfunction during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1990;81:IV14–19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wohlgelernter D, Jaffe CC, Cabin HS, Yeatman LA, Jr, Cleman M. Silent ischemia during coronary occlusion produced by balloon inflation: relation to regional myocardial dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;10:491–498. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80189-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Falcone C, Auguadro C, Sconocchia R, et al. Susceptibility to pain during coronary angioplasty: usefulness of pulpal test. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:903–909. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00252-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Laukkanen JA, Kurl S, Lakka TA, et al. Exercise-induced silent myocardial ischemia and coronary morbidity and mortality in middle-aged men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38:72–79. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01311-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sosnov J, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ, Yarzebski J, Gore JM. Differential symptoms of acute myocardial infarction in patients with kidney disease: a community-wide perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. 2006;47:378–384. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Levin A, Thompson CR, Ethier J, et al. Left ventricular mass index increase in early renal disease: impact of decline in hemoglobin. Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34:125–134. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70118-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amann K, Breitbach M, Ritz E, Mall G. Myocyte/capillary mismatch in the heart of uremic patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1998;9:1018–1022. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V961018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ieda M, Fukuda K. New aspects for the treatment of cardiac diseases based on the diversity of functional controls on cardiac muscles: the regulatory mechanisms of cardiac innervation and their critical roles in cardiac performance. J Pharmacol Sci. 2009;109:348–353. doi: 10.1254/jphs.08r25fm. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cao JM, Fishbein MC, Han JB, et al. Relationship between regional cardiac hyperinnervation and ventricular arrhythmia. Circulation. 2000;101:1960–1969. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.16.1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Carrero JJ, Stenvinkel P. Persistent inflammation as a catalyst for other risk factors in chronic kidney disease: a hypothesis proposal. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(Suppl 1):S49–55. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02720409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li JJ. Silent myocardial ischemia may be related to inflammatory response. Med Hypotheses. 2004;62:252–256. doi: 10.1016/S0306-9877(03)00305-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Parthenakis F, Kochiadakis G, Simantirakis E, et al. Incidence of ventricular arrhythmias during silent myocardial ischaemia in coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 1996;57:61–67. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(96)02793-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ditchburn CJ, Hall JA, de Belder M, et al. Silent myocardial ischaemia in patients with proved coronary artery disease: a comparison of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77:395–398. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.908.395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Falcone C, Nespoli L, Geroldi D, et al. Silent myocardial ischemia in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2003;90:219–227. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5273(02)00558-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Caracciolo EA, Chaitman BR, Forman SA, et al. Diabetics with coronary disease have a prevalence of asymptomatic ischemia during exercise treadmill testing and ambulatory ischemia monitoring similar to that of nondiabetic patients. An ACIP database study ACIP Investigators. Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot Investigators. Circulation. 1996;93:2097–2105. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.93.12.2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wackers FJ, Young LH, Inzucchi SE, et al. Detection of silent myocardial ischemia in asymptomatic diabetic subjects: the DIAD study. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1954–1961. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vinik AI, Maser RE, Mitchell BD, Freeman R. Diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:1553–1579. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kalantar-Zadeh K, Block G, Humphreys MH, Kopple JD. Reverse epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors in maintenance dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2003;63:793–808. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Koehntop DE, Rodman JH. Fentanyl pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing renal transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 1997;17:746–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Serruys PW. Fourth annual American College of Cardiology international lecture: a journey in the interventional field. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1754–1768. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Newsome LT, Kutcher MA, Royster RL. Coronary artery stents: Part I. Evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:552–569. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181732049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Newsome LT, Weller RS, Gerancher JC, Kutcher MA, Royster RL. Coronary artery stents: II. Perioperative considerations and management. Anesth Analg. 2008;107:570–590. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181731e95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Heyndrickx GR. Is functional assessment necessary in patients with stable angina? EuroIntervention. 2010;6(Suppl G):G101–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Blankenship JC, Moussa ID, Chambers CC, et al. Staging of multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions: an expert consensus statement from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79:1138–1152. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table. Numbers of diseased coronary vessels and stents placed at time of percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESOURCES