Abstract
Introduction:
Campylobacters are the most frequently identified bacteria causing diarrhoea in humans worldwide. Campylobacter lanienae was isolated for the first time in 2000 from faecal samples of two asymptomatic abattoir workers in Switzerland during a routine hygiene screen, but has never been associated with human disease.
Case presentation:
At hospital admission, the patient reported diarrhoea, lower abdominal cramps, nausea, one episode of bilious vomiting and low-grade fever of 38 °C. The patient was having 10 or more diarrheic stools per day as well as during the night, and had noticed blood mixed with the stools on several occasions. Stool cultures were negative for species of Salmonella and Shigella, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica, but were positive for C. lanienae. Identification was made by classical biochemical testing, as well as 16S rRNA gene and cpn60 sequencing. The patient slowly improved without antibiotic treatment and was discharged nine days after admission with complete resolution of symptoms.
Conclusion:
On the whole it seems very likely that C. lanienae was the causative agent. Clinical microbiologists should be aware of this micro-organism which can be identified by phenotypic and molecular methods. The real burden of C. lanienae infection in humans might be underestimated and should be further investigated as a potential cause of human diarrhoea disease.
Keywords: Campylobacter, enteritis, campylobacteriosis
Introduction
Campylobacters are the most frequently identified bacteria causing diarrhoea in humans worldwide (Allos, 2001). Camplylobacter lanienae was isolated for the first time in 2000 from faecal samples of two asymptomatic abattoir workers in Switzerland during a routine hygiene screen (Logan et al., 2000), but has never been reported in humans since. C. lanienae has also been isolated from pig and wild boars faeces in Japan (Sasaki et al., 2003, 2013), Hungary (Schweitzer et al., 2011), Korea (Shin & Lee, 2009) and the USA (Jay-Russell et al., 2012), from wild ruminants in Spain (Carbonero et al., 2014; Navarro-Gonzalez et al., 2014), from sheep in Turkey (Acik et al., 2013) and Spain (Oporto & Hurtado, 2011), and from bovine faeces in Alberta (Inglis et al., 2003, 2004, 2005) as well as in Quebec (Guevremont et al., 2008). Recently, the bacterium was also isolated from laboratory chinchillas in the USA (Turowski et al., 2014). In this study we report what seems to be, to our knowledge, the first case of a symptomatic human infection with C. lanienae.
Case report
In March 2009, a 39-year-old female sought treatment at the emergency department of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, reporting a 5-day history of diarrhoea, lower abdominal cramps, nausea, one episode of bilious vomiting and low-grade fever of 38 °C. She was having 10 or more diarrheic stools per day as well as during the night, and had noticed blood mixed with the stools on several occasions. She denied any infectious contact, recent antibiotic treatment or travel outside the province of Quebec. She was living on a hog farm and usually drank water from a private well. One year prior to the consultation, the patient had a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome and a colonoscopy performed then was normal. For the past few months, she was experiencing three loose stools a day. The patient had also been diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism and refractory interstitial cystitis, and had a total hysterectomy. Her daily medication included esomeprazole, levothyroxine, phenazopyridine, amitriptyline, pentosan polysulfate sodium and pregabalin. Physical examination showed sinus tachycardia with normal blood pressure and a temperature of 37.5 °C. The abdomen was diffusely tender but soft with normal bowel sounds. The complete blood count, serum electrolytes, creatinine, and liver and pancreatic enzymes were normal. A pelvic and abdominal ultrasound showed only a left ovarian cyst. The patient was admitted to our hospital for intravenous hydration and observation. Because of the persistence of symptoms five days after admission, a colonoscopy was performed and revealed mild inflammation in the left colon. Biopsies confirmed discrete acute focal colitis. The Clostridium difficile toxin assay and a stool examination for ova and parasites were negative. Blood cultures were also negative. Stool cultures done two days apart were negative for species of Salmonella and Shigella, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Yersinia enterocolitica, but showed a ‘Campylobacter-like’ organism. Because the patient’s symptoms were not compatible with a viral infection, no viral detection tests were performed. The patient slowly improved without antibiotic treatment and was discharged nine days after admission with complete resolution of her symptoms.
Investigations
The stool sample was initially streaked on Karmali agar and incubated under microaerobic conditions generated in a jar with a CampyGen sachet (Oxoid) at 42 °C for 48 h. Small, grey, flat, irregular or round and moist colonies were observed but growth was poor compared to the Campylobacter jejuni control strain. The Gram stain revealed slender, curved Gram-negative rods. The organism was oxidase- and catalase-positive, hippurate-negative, indoxyl acetate-negative, resistant to both nalidixic acid and cephalothin, and susceptible both to erythromycin and ciprofloxacin by the disc diffusion method.
The Laboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec (LSPQ) further identified the isolate by sequencing the cpn60 gene (Hill et al., 2006) and the 16S rRNA gene (Bekal et al., 2006). BLAST analysis of the partial 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained (1221 bp), using the taxonomy browser of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), revealed between 98 % and 100 % sequence identity with available C. lanienae sequences. The sequence was deposited in the GenBank database under accession number HM770742. Fig. 1 shows the phylogenetic position of the patient’s isolate (001A-0718) in a neighbour-joining tree representing the genetic relatedness between DNA sequences of the partial 16S rRNA gene of Campylobacter lineage. The isolate represented a distinct monophyletic lineage within the genus Campylobacter and was related to human strains NCTC 13004 and UB 993, the only two strains of C. lanienae previously isolated from humans (Logan et al., 2000). Sequence comparison of our isolate with NCTC 13004 showed 99.43 % similarity for 1220 nucleotides. The partial sequence of the cpn60 gene was also compared with cpnBD (Hill et al., 2004) and the isolate was identified as C. lanienae.
Fig. 1.
Phylogenetic tree based on the neighbour-joining method representing the genetic relatedness between partial 16S rRNA gene sequences for campylobacters. The bar represents the percentage of similarity, and numbers on the tree indicate internal branch distances within the resulting trees obtained by bootstrap analysis (1000 replicates). GenBank accession numbers are in parentheses.
Fig. 2 shows the phylogenetic position of our isolate in an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree representing the genetic relatedness between DNA sequences of the partial 16S rRNA gene from C. lanienae isolated worldwide from human, bovine and swine faeces. Our isolate clustered with C. lanienae previously isolated from swine in Japan, Austria, Ireland, Switzerland and Canada, and the sequence analysed showed the same five nucleotide differences in regard to bovine isolates, as previously described by Guevremont et al. (2008). The fact that our isolate was resistant to cephalothin also supported the relationship with swine isolates, as bovine strains are typically susceptible to cephalothin (Shin & Lee, 2009).
Fig. 2.
Phylogenetic tree based on the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) method representing the genetic relatedness between sequences of the partial 16S rRNA gene for C. lanienae. The bar represents the percentage of similarity. C. jejuni was used as an outgroup.
Discussion
In a PCR-based survey of Campylobacter associated with faeces collected from beef cattle, Campylobacter DNA was detected in 83 % of the samples (Inglis et al., 2003). The most frequently detected species was C. lanienae (49 %), followed by C. jejuni (38 %), Cmpylobacter hyointestinalis (8 %) and Campylobacter coli (0.5 %). In another study, some cattle were found to be shedding exceptionally large numbers of cells (approximately 108 cells g−1), and numbers of C. lanienae released in the environment in cattle faeces could exceed 1012 cells per animal per day(Inglis et al., 2004). Inglis et al. reported that C. lanienae dwells in the large intestine, including the caecum, proximal ascending colon, distal descending colon, and rectum of cattle (Inglis et al., 2005) and suggested that C. lanienae may be pathogenic to cattle (Inglis et al., 2004).
Inglis et al. also observed that PCR-based detection methods were substantially more effective for detecting C. lanienae from faecal specimens than conventional culture methods (Inglis et al., 2003). They isolated C. lanienae from cattle faeces, but found that cattle strains of the bacterium were very fastidious and did not grow on many of the commercial media commonly used to isolate campylobacters (Inglis & Kalischuk, 2003). The first isolation of C. lanienae was obtained on Campylosel agar, consisting of 5 % (v/v) blood in a Columbia agar base with the selective antibiotics cefoperazone, vancomycin and amphothericin B (Logan et al., 2000). When comparing different culture media for growing C. lanienae from cattle faeces, Inglis and Kalischuk were only able to recover isolates from Karmali medium at 40 °C (Inglis & Kalischuk, 2003). C. lanienae is susceptible to polymyxin B (Logan et al., 2000), which might explain why the organism cannot be recovered from Preston and Campy-Line media. Also, bovine strains of C. lanienae in Canada typically cannot be isolated on CCDA, the most common medium used in hospitals to isolate campylobacter from human stool samples (Inglis et al., 2004). As our hospital laboratory uses Karmali agar as the routine media for the detection of Campylobacter in human faeces, we were able to detect the presence of C. lanienae in our patient.
In 2009, nearly 20 % of the 2025 Campylobacter isolates notified in Quebec were not identified to the species level and were reported as Campylobacter sp. (Bureau de surveillance et vigie, 2010), possibly due to the inability (or the lack of interest or resources) of the clinical laboratory to perform phenotypic identification tests for species of Campylobacter other than C. jejuni. On the whole it seems very likely that C. lanienae was the causative agent. Furthermore, given that C. lanienae would not typically be detected in human diagnostic facilities, despite its prevalence in cattle and pig faeces, the real burden of C. lanienae in humans might be underestimated and should be further investigated as a potential cause of human diarrhoea disease.
Acknowledgements
We thank the personnel of the clinical microbiology laboratory of the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke for the strain isolation and biochemical analysis.
This study was conducted with funding from the Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
References
- Acik M. N., Karahan M., Ongor H., Cetinkaya B.(2013). Investigation of virulence and cytolethal distending toxin genes in Campylobacter spp. isolated from sheep in Turkey. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10589–594. 10.1089/fpd.2012.1447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allos B. M.(2001). Campylobacter jejuni infections: update on emerging issues and trends. Clin Infect Dis 321201–1206. 10.1086/319760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bekal S., Gaudreau C., Laurence R. A., Simoneau E., Raynal L.(2006). Streptococcus pseudoporcinus sp. nov., a novel species isolated from the genitourinary tract of women. J Clin Microbiol 442584–2586. 10.1128/JCM.02707-05 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bureau de surveillance et vigie (2010). Nombre (n) de cas déclarés et taux d'incidence (Ti) annuelle par 100,000 habitants de campylobactériose selon l'espèce, province de Québec, 2000-2009. Ministère de la santé et des services sociaux du Québec. [Google Scholar]
- Carbonero A., Paniagua J., Torralbo A., Arenas-Montes A., Borge C., García-Bocanegra I.(2014). Campylobacter infection in wild artiodactyl species from southern Spain: occurrence, risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 37115–121. 10.1016/j.cimid.2014.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guévremont E., Normand V., Lamoureux L., Côté C.(2008). Genetic detection of Campylobacter lanienae in fecal matter and stored manure from swine and dairy cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis 5361–364. 10.1089/fpd.2007.0054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill J. E., Paccagnella A., Law K., Melito P. L., Woodward D. L., Price L., Leung A. H., Ng L. K., Hemmingsen S. M., Goh S. H.(2006). Identification of Campylobacter spp. and discrimination from Helicobacter and Arcobacter spp. by direct sequencing of PCR-amplified cpn60 sequences and comparison to cpnDB, a chaperonin reference sequence database. J Med Microbiol 55393–399. 10.1099/jmm.0.46282-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hill J. E., Penny S. L., Crowell K. G., Goh S. H., Hemmingsen S. M.(2004). cpnDB: a chaperonin sequence database. Genome Res 141669–1675. 10.1101/gr.2649204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inglis G. D., Kalischuk L. D.(2003). Use of PCR for direct detection of Campylobacter species in bovine feces. Appl Environ Microbiol 693435–3447. 10.1128/AEM.69.6.3435-3447.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inglis G. D., Kalischuk L. D.(2004). Direct quantification of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae in feces of cattle by real-time quantitative PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 702296–2306. 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2296-2306.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inglis G. D., Kalischuk L. D., Busz H. W.(2003). A survey of Campylobacter species shed in faeces of beef cattle using polymerase chain reaction. Can J Microbiol 49655–661. 10.1139/w03-087 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inglis G. D., Kalischuk L. D., Busz H. W.(2004). Chronic shedding of Campylobacter species in beef cattle. J Appl Microbiol 97410–420. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02313.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inglis G. D., Kalischuk L. D., Busz H. W., Kastelic J. P.(2005). Colonization of cattle intestines by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae. Appl Environ Microbiol 715145–5153. 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5145-5153.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jay-Russell M. T., Bates A., Harden L., Miller W. G., Mandrell R. E.(2012). Isolation of Campylobacter from feral swine (Sus scrofa) on the ranch associated with the 2006 Escherichia coli O157:H7 spinach outbreak investigation in California. Zoonoses Public Health 59314–319. 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2012.01465.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Logan J. M., Burnens A., Linton D., Lawson A. J., Stanley J.(2000). Campylobacter lanienae sp. nov., a new species isolated from workers in an abattoir. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50865–872. 10.1099/00207713-50-2-865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Navarro-Gonzalez N., Ugarte-Ruiz M., Porrero M. C., Zamora L., Mentaberre G., Serrano E., Mateos A., Lavín S., Domínguez L.(2014). Campylobacter shared between free-ranging cattle and sympatric wild ungulates in a natural environment (NE Spain). Ecohealth 11333–342. 10.1007/s10393-014-0921-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oporto B., Hurtado A.(2011). Emerging thermotolerant Campylobacter species in healthy ruminants and swine. Foodborne Pathog Dis 8807–813. 10.1089/fpd.2010.0803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki Y., Fujisawa T., Ogikubo K., Ohzono T., Ishihara K., Takahashi T.(2003). Characterization of Campylobacter lanienae from pig feces. J Vet Med Sci 65129–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sasaki Y., Goshima T., Mori T., Murakami M., Haruna M., Ito K., Yamada Y.(2013). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of foodborne bacteria in wild boars (Sus scrofa) and wild deer (Cervus nippon) in Japan. Foodborne Pathog Dis 10985–991. 10.1089/fpd.2013.1548 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schweitzer N., Damjanova I, Kaszanyitzky E., Ursu K., Samu P., Tóth A. G., Varga J., Dán A.(2011). Molecular characterization of Campylobacter lanienae strains isolated from food-producing animals. Foodborne Pathog Dis 8615–621. 10.1089/fpd.2010.0754 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shin E., Lee Y.(2009). Comparison of three different methods for Campylobacter isolation from porcine intestines. J Microbiol Biotechnol 19647–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turowski E. E., Shen Z., Ducore R. M., Parry N. M., Kirega A., Dewhirst F. E., Fox J. G.(2014). Isolation of a Campylobacter lanienae-like bacterium from laboratory chinchillas (Chinchilla laniger). Zoonoses Public Health 61571–580. 10.1111/zph.12107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


