Abstract
The prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) among patients with ankle and foot fractures in Australia treated nonsurgically is unknown. Indications for thromboprophylaxis screening and management are unclear.
The primary outcome was the prevalence rate of DVT among nonsurgically managed ankle and foot fracture patients. Patients were enrolled into a prospective cross-sectional pilot study at an outpatient hospital fracture clinic. DVT risk factors and symptoms were recorded at time of recruitment followed by referral for compression duplex ultrasonography. Independent t-test and Fisher exact test were used to assess the significance of these variables with DVT.
A total of 72 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 11% (8/72) of patients had DVT—seven distal DVTs and one proximal DVT. Four were symptomatic including the patient with a proximal thrombus. In comparison, the majority of patients were asymptomatic of DVT (63/72). A significant risk factor found to be associated with DVT was age ≥ 45 (p = 0.013) years, and a lack of symptoms (p = 0.006) was associated with no DVT.
This pilot study is the first in Australia to investigate the prevalence of DVT in this specific subgroup of patients. We found a prevalence of 11% of DVT in a small group of patients with age ≥ 45 years, being the only significant associated risk factor. Future larger scale prospective studies are warranted to confirm these results.
Keywords: deep vein thrombosis, duplex, ultrasound, lower extremity, proximal, distal
Fractures damage adjacent blood vessel walls exposing collagen and tissue factor which activate the coagulation cascade and the resulting hypercoagulability increases the risk of thrombosis.1 Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) causes significant mortality, morbidity, and financial burden on the community.2 3 4 Immobilization, the mainstay of managing a fracture can increase the risk of thrombosis up to 19%5 because of the loss of the calf muscle venous pump mechanism. Below knee cast immobilization for nonsurgical treatment of leg trauma is strongly associated with thrombosis (odds ratio, 12.7; confidence interval [CI] 95%, 6.6–24.6).6 The high prevalence of lower limb DVT in hip, pelvic, and long bone fracture is well recognized but literature on ambulating patients with ankle and foot fractures is particularly sparse.2 7 8 9 10 DVT in this subgroup has been reported to vary from 1.1 to 20%.1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 However, some of these studies report rates without differentiating DVT from pulmonary embolism and were confounded with nonbony injuries such as tendon ruptures, sprains, and dislocations. Accounting for studies that included only fractures, reported prevalence is from 0.6 up to 5%. Other risk factors for DVT have been well documented include high body mass index (BMI), old age, smoking, use of oral contraceptive pills (OCP), and hormone replacement therapy (HRT).4 5 7 8 9 18
The variability in prevalence rates sets unclear indications for diagnosis and prophylaxis. In a UK survey, 84% of hospitals lacked routine prophylaxis for patients with ankle fractures requiring plaster casts and 64% did not perform DVT risk assessment.19 The American College of Chest Physicians do not recommend prophylaxis for isolated injuries distal to the knee.10 The aim of this pilot study is to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of DVT in patients with ankle and foot fractures treated with nonoperative management.
Methods
This prospective cross-sectional pilot study was conducted in an outpatient orthopedic fracture clinic of a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia.
Between February and August 2014, consecutive patients ≥ 18 years of age with a radiologically confirmed ankle or foot fracture treated nonsurgically were identified at the clinic and recruited. An ankle fracture included lateral or medial malleoli and the distal tibiofibular, tibiotalar, or subtalar joint. A foot fracture included any bone distal to the subtalar joint. Exclusion criteria included the following: multitrauma, prior venous thromboembolism (VTE), current use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents, or presented to the clinic outside the 7 to 90 day postfracture period. All enrolled patients provided written informed consent.
Baseline demographic data, time to clinic follow-up, and ultrasound assessment since injury, DVT symptoms and specific DVT risk factors were recorded using a standardized questionnaire at the time of recruitment. Risk factors included age, gender, BMI, smoking status, use of OCP, use of HRT, history of active cancer, history of bleeding or clotting disorder, family history of DVT, method of immobilization, and weight-bearing status on discharge from the Department.4 5 8 9 18 Patients were referred for compression duplex ultrasonography (CDUS) of the lower limb with the fracture. If a DVT was found, the contralateral leg was also scanned and the patient was referred to a vascular specialist for appropriate treatment. Distal DVT was defined as a thrombus in the deep veins of the calf including axial and muscular named deep veins. Thrombus in veins including or proximal to the popliteal vein was classified as proximal DVT. If CDUS was completed on a day after recruitment, time to CDUS was adjusted accordingly. Recruited patients were contacted by phone to confirm their participation if no result was available after 2 weeks.
The study was approved by the hospital's Human Ethics Research Committee (Approval number: LNR/13/SVH/397).
Statistical Analysis
Continuous and categorical variables were reported as medians, means, and proportions with 95% CIs. Nonparametric data underwent log10 transformation before testing significance. Patient characteristics and risk factors were assessed with independent t-test for continuous variables and Fisher exact test for categorical variables. Data were adjusted with bootstrapping (no. of resamples = 1,000) in all analyzes. A p value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be significant. All data were analyzed with SPSS v22.0 (Statiscal Package for Social Sciences; IBM, Armonk, NY).20
Results
During the study period, 116 patients treated with surgery presented to the clinic while 162 patients with nonsurgical ankle and foot fractures were identified. Overall, 90 patients were excluded (current anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, n = 9; multitrauma, n = 7; prior VTE, n = 3; presented outside the 7- to 90-day time period, n = 35; declined consent or did not attend the clinic, n = 36) leaving 72 patients for analysis. The characteristics and DVT risk-specific factors of the study cohort are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics and risk factors of the study groupa .
Variables | N (%) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
DVT | ||
Nil | 27 (37.5) | 26.4–48.6 |
DVT detected | 8 (11.1) | 4.2–19.4 |
CDUS not completed | 37 (51.4) | 38.9–62.5 |
Age (y), median, range | 38 (22–80) | |
Gender | ||
Female | 39 (54.2) | 41.7–65.3 |
Male | 33 (45.8) | 34.7–58.3 |
BMI (kg/m2), median, range | 24 (14–43) | |
Fracture | ||
Foot | 40 (55.6) | 44.4–66.7 |
Ankle | 29 (40.3) | 29.2–52.7 |
Ankle + foot | 3 (4.2) | 0.0–9.7 |
Ipsilateral | 66 (91.7) | 84.7–97.2 |
Bilateral | 6 (8.3) | 2.8–15.3 |
Immobilization | ||
Full cast | 5 (6.9) | 1.4–13.9 |
Backslab | 11 (15.3) | 6.9–23.6 |
CAMboot | 50 (69.4) | 58.3–80.6 |
Pressure bandage | 3 (4.2) | 0.0–9.7 |
None | 3 (4.2) | 0.0–9.7 |
Weight-bearing status | ||
NWB | 34 (47.2) | 36.1–58.3 |
PWB | 13 (18.1) | 9.7–27.8 |
WBAT | 25 (34.7) | 23.6–47.2 |
DVT symptoms | ||
None | 63 (87.5) | |
Calf pain | 7 (9.7) | 4.2–18.0 |
Edema | 1 (1.4) | 0.0–4.2 |
Combination | 1 (1.4) | 0.0–4.2 |
Time to fracture clinic (d), median, range | 23 (7–90) | |
Time to CDUS (d), median, range | 32 (7–90) | |
Smoking status | ||
Nonsmoker | 28 (38.9) | 26.4–50.0 |
Exsmoker | 25 (34.7) | 25.0–47.2 |
Current | 19 (26.4) | 16.7–100.0 |
History of current OCP useb | 5/39 (12.8) | 2.3–22.5 |
History of current HRT useb | 7/39 (17.9) | 5.9–29.9 |
Family history of VTE | 2 (2.8) | 0.0–6.9 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAMboot, controlled ankle movement boot; CDUS, compression duplex ultrasonography; CI, confidence interval; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NWB, nonweight bearing; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; PWB, partial weight bearing; VTE, venous thromboembolism; WBAT, weight bearing as tolerated.
n = 72.
This data are for female patients (n = 39).
Note: No patients had history of active cancer or clotting/bleeding disorders.
During the 6 months, there was significant loss to follow-up with 35 patients receiving a CDUS (CDUS-R) while the remaining patients were nonresponders (n = 37). These were patients who were recruited into the study, completed the questionnaire, referred for CDUS but did not attend and were lost to follow-up. In the CDUS-R group, 23% of patients (95% CI, 11.4–37.1; n = 8) were positive for DVT; seven distal DVT and one proximal DVT. Half of this group (n = 4) reported symptoms at the time of recruitment meaning the vast majority of the CDUS-R group were asymptomatic. Lack of symptoms was statistically significant for not developing a DVT (p = 0.006). The pertinent features of the eight patients with DVT are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Features of patients with deep vein thrombosisa .
Patient | Age | Gender | BMI | Fracture | dDVT vs. pDVT | Time to CDUS | Other risk factors |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 34 | Male | 31 | Combinationb | Distal | 63 | Exsmoker, full cast, NWB, calf pain |
2 | 45 | Male | 22 | Calcaneusc | Distal | 73 | Smoker, CAMboot, NWB, calf pain |
3 | 46 | Male | 23 | Metatarsal | Distal | 42 | Smoker, full cast, PWB, nil symptoms |
4 | 52 | Female | 25 | Calcaneus | Distal | 16 | Smoker, CAMboot, WBAT, calf pain, HRT use |
5 | 55 | Male | 23 | Malleolus | Distal | 23 | Nonsmoker, CAMboot, NWB, nil symptoms |
6 | 66 | Female | 14 | Distal fibula | Proximal | 21 | Exsmoker, CAMboot, PWB, calf pain |
7 | 80 | Female | 27 | Distal fibula | Distal | 37 | Smoker, CAMboot, WBAT, nil symptoms |
8 | 57 | Female | 19 | Combinationd | Distal | 9 | Nonsmoker, CAMboot, WBAT, nil symptoms, HRT use, family history of VTE |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAMboot, controlled ankle movement boot; CDUS, compression duplex ultrasonography; dDVT, distal deep vein thrombosis; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NWB, nonweight bearing; pDVT, proximal deep vein thrombosis; PWB, partial weight bearing; VTE, venous thromboembolism; WBAT, weight bearing as tolerated.
n = 8.
Metatarsal, cuneiform and Lisfranc fractures.
This patient had bilateral calcaneal fractures.
Medial malleolus, distal tibial, and fibular fractures.
Nonresponders were also mostly asymptomatic with only four patients reporting DVT symptoms—two had calf pain, one had calf swelling, and one had both pain and swelling. The characteristics of this group are outlined in Table 3.
Table 3. Characteristics of nonrespondersa .
Variables | N (%) | 95% CI |
---|---|---|
Age (y), median, range | 33 (22–59) | |
Gender | ||
Female | 17 (45.9) | 29.7–62.1 |
Male | 20 (54.1) | 37.9–70.3 |
BMI (kg/m2), median, range | 24 (19–32) | |
Fracture | ||
Foot | 21 (56.8) | 40.5–73.0 |
Ankle | 15 (40.5) | 24.3–56.8 |
Ankle + foot | 1 (2.7) | 0.0–8.1 |
Ipsilateral | 34 (91.1) | 81.1–100.0 |
Bilateral | 3 (8.1) | 0.0–18.9 |
Immobilization | ||
Full cast | 0 | 0 |
Backslab | 9 (24.3) | 10.8–37.8 |
CAMboot | 25 (67.6) | 51.4–81.1 |
Pressure bandage | 1 (2.7) | 0.0–8.1 |
None | 2 (5.4) | 0.0–13.5 |
Weight-bearing status | ||
NWB | 20 (54.1) | 37.8–70.3 |
PWB | 5 (13.5) | 2.7–24.3 |
WBAT | 12 (32.4) | 18.9–48.6 |
DVT symptoms | ||
None | 33 (89.2) | 78.4–97.3 |
Calf pain | 2 (5.4) | 0.0–13.5 |
Edema | 1 (2.7) | 0.0–8.1 |
Combination | 1 (2.7) | 0.0–8.1 |
Time to fracture clinic (d), median, range | 17 (7–70) | |
Smoking status | ||
Nonsmoker | 17 (45.9) | 29.7–62.2 |
Exsmoker | 12 (32.4) | 18.9–48.6 |
Current | 8 (21.6) | 8.1–35.1 |
History of current OCP useb | 4/17 (23.5) | 5.9–43.8 |
History of current HRT useb | 1/17 (5.9) | 0.0–20.0 |
Family history of VTE | 1 (2.7) | 0.0–8.1 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAMboot, controlled ankle movement boot; CI, confidence interval; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NWB, nonweight bearing; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; PWB, partial weight bearing; VTE, venous thromboembolism; WBAT, weight bearing as tolerated.
n = 37.
This data are for female patients (n = 17).
Note: No patients had history of active cancer or clotting/bleeding disorders.
Median follow-up time at the clinic postfracture was 23 days (range, 7–90 days) and the median time to CDUS from day of injury was 32 days (range, 7–90 days). Majority of patients (69%) and the CDUS-R group (71%) had their fracture immobilized with a controlled ankle movement walker (CAMboot). The characteristics and risk factors between CDUS-R patients with and without DVT are compared in Table 4. The mean age of patients with DVT was 53 ± 1.3 SD (p = 0.011) and age ≥ 45 was statistically significant (p = 0.013).
Table 4. CDUS-R groupa .
Variables | No DVT (n = 27) | DVT detected (n = 8) | p Value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (y)a | 39 ± 1.4 (34.8–43.7) | 53 ± 1.3 (44.3–63.7) | 0.011 |
Gender | 0.433 | ||
Female | 18 (66.7) | 4 (50.0) | |
Male | 9 (33.3) | 4 (50.0) | |
BMI (kg/m2)a | 25 ± 7.3 (23.7–27.4) | 23 ± 9.9 (19.2–26.1) | 0.159 |
Fracture | 0.820 | ||
Foot | 15 (55.6) | 4 (50.0) | |
Ankle | 10 (37.0) | 4 (50.0) | |
Ankle + foot | 2 (7.4) | 0 | |
Ipsilateral | 25 (92.6) | 7 (87.5) | 0.553 |
Bilateral | 2 (7.4) | 1 (12.5) | |
Immobilization | 0.898 | ||
Full cast | 3 (11.1) | 2 (25.0) | |
Backslab | 2 (7.4) | 0 | |
CAMboot | 19 (70.4) | 6 (75.0) | |
Pressure bandage | 2 (7.4) | 0 | |
None | 1 (3.7) | 0 | |
Weight-bearing status | 1.000 | ||
NWB | 11 (40.7) | 3 (37.5) | |
PWB | 6 (22.2) | 2 (25.0) | |
WBAT | 10 (37.0) | 3 (37.5) | |
DVT symptoms | 0.006 | ||
None | 26 (96.3) | 4 (50.0) | |
Calf pain | 1 (3.7) | 4 (50.0) | |
Time to fracture clinic (d)b | 28 ± 2.1 (21.3–36.5) | 29 ± 2.0 (17.5–47.1) | 0.871 |
Time to CDUS (d)b | 28 ± 2.1 (20.8–36.7) | 29 ± 2.0 (17.4–45.7) | 0.905 |
Smoking status | 0.597 | ||
Nonsmoker | 9 (33.3) | 2 (25.0) | |
Exsmoker | 11 (40.7) | 2 (25.0) | |
Current | 7 (25.9) | 4 (50.0) | |
History of current OCP use b | 1/18 (5.6) | 4/4 (100.0) | 1.000 |
History of current HRT use b | 3/18 (16.7) | 2/5 (50.0) | 0.210 |
Family history of VTE | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 0.229 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CAMboot, controlled ankle movement boot; CDUS-R, compression duplex ultrasonography received; CDUS, compression duplex ultrasonography; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; HRT, hormone replacement therapy; NWB, nonweight bearing; OCP, oral contraceptive pill; PWB, partial weight bearing; VTE, venous thromboembolism; WBAT, weight bearing as tolerated.
n = 35.
Conversion from Log10 transformed data.
Comparison between female patients with no DVT (n = 18) and with DVT (n = 4).
Note: Data expressed as means ± SD (95% CI) or number (percentage). No patients had active cancer of history of clotting/bleeding disorders. Bold value highlights the only significant risk factor found in this study.
Discussion
The prevalence of DVT in patients recovering from an ankle or foot fracture with nonoperative management was 23% after undergoing CDUS. Suboptimal patient adherence to CDUS strongly suggests that our results must be interpreted with caution. However, as majority of the patients with CDUS-R without DVT were asymptomatic (96.3%), if we assume this was a consistent trend asymptomatic nonresponders (89.2%) would then likely have scanned negative for DVT. Applying this assumption to the whole sample, results in an extrapolated prevalence of 11% (8/72; 95% CI, 5.6–18.1). As a best conservative estimate, this still exceeds the highest reported prevalence of 5% in comparable studies. Therefore, despite the low numbers in our study, the prevalence of DVT in this subgroup of orthopedic patients may be under recognized.
There are few published studies that specifically identify the prevalence of DVT in patients with ankle and foot fractures exclusively.21 Patil et al identified DVT in 5% of patients with ankle fractures treated with below-knee plaster.11 Manafi Rasi et al found a proportion of DVT at 3.1% in 95 patients with ankle sprains and stable foot and ankle fractures.13 A similarly low occurrence of 3.5% was found by Solis and Saxby in a prospective study of 201 patients postsurgical repair of ankle and foot injuries.22 In comparison, Lapidus et al observed DVT in 28% of patients 5 weeks after ankle fracture surgery without postoperative thromboprophylaxis.23 In a prospective study of 2,761 patients with nonsurgical isolated lower limb injuries, DVT occurred at 6.4%.15 Our study observed a prevalence of 11% in 72 patients with only ankle or foot fractures.
We found that age ≥ 45 years was the only statistically significant risk factor for DVT. In two other prospective studies, the mean age of patients with DVT after ankle or foot fracture was approximately 50 years.11 13 Patients older than 50 years has been shown to be an independent significant risk factor for DVT in nonsurgical lower limb injuries15 and after ankle or foot surgery.22 Increasing age is a risk factor for DVT4 8 9 18 which doubles with each decade beyond 40 years regardless of other risk factors.24
Nearly all our patients who had normal CDUS were asymptomatic (96.3%, 26/27) which reflects existing literature.11 13 15 22 23 25 Ciuti et al observed a prevalence of 20.7% for asymptomatic DVT26 while an observational study of 1,071 patients reported 1.8%.27 In the blind prospective CALTHRO study, 85% of outpatients with symptoms of DVT and abnormal D-dimer levels did not have DVT on whole leg color Doppler ultrasound.25
Most of our patients had distal DVT and recent evidence has suggested that the risk factor profile for distal DVT is different for proximal DVT.25 Distal DVT is associated with transient risk factors such as recent trauma, immobilization, long haul travel, and preexisting leg varicosities rather than advanced age, pregnancy, prior VTE, or active cancer.25 26 Our patients presented 7 to 90 days postfracture with ankle or foot immobilization and distal DVT is known to develop and propagate within this time.1 28 29 30 The CALTHRO study suggested only 3% of isolated distal DVT extend proximally and over 90% resolve by 3 months.14 25 It is possible in our study that the patients who had later scans may have already underwent recanalization leading to an underestimated prevalence rate.
Aside from age, all other risk factors we assessed did not show statistical significance although numerous studies have shown otherwise. Riou et al demonstrated that rigid immobilization (p < 0.0001) was an independent significant risk factor for DVT along with age older than 50 years (p < 0.0001), severe injury (defined as fracture, dislocation, or tendon rupture; p < 0.0002), and nonweight bearing (p < 0.0015).15 A combination of three or more risk factors (p = 0.01) significantly increases the incidence of DVT13 as the incidence increases proportionally with the number of risk factors.18 24 27
Most studies conclude thromboprophylaxis and ultrasound screening is not routinely indicated in patients with ankle and foot fractures. We observed a prevalence of 11% (8/72) with a modest data set and large loss to follow-up so our results must interpreted with caution. However, it casts light back onto the question that risk assessment and stratification for DVT should be considered for patients postfracture in the ankle or foot.9 10 25 27 31 This may identify higher risk individuals and facilitate early DVT prophylaxis or monitoring.
This pilot study has unveiled limitations and logistical issues to be addressed in the future. Notably, the limitations include the small number of patients and the low adherence to attending ultrasound assessment. Logistically, it was not possible to perform ultrasonography for patients at enrolment. The lack of lower limb symptoms, impaired subject mobility, and understaffed ultrasound clinic may have contributed to low compliance with CDUS. As the study was conducted at only one site and with low subject numbers, generalization of the results is not reliable. A larger prospective study in the future is feasible utilizing multiple study sites to further explore our results with minimal loss to follow-up.
Conclusion
As far as we know, this pilot study is the first study in Australia to investigate the prevalence of this disease in this specific subgroup of patients. We found a prevalence of 11% of DVT, with age ≥ 45 years being a significant risk factor for DVT. Future larger scale prospective studies of higher power are warranted to confirm this prevalence of DVT and this may result in reevaluation of current VTE prophylaxis guidelines in this patient group.
Acknowledgment
The authors acknowledge Orthopedic Fracture Clinic Staff (St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney) for their support.
References
- 1.van Adrichem R A, Debeij J, Nelissen R G, Schipper I B, Rosendaal F R, Cannegieter S C. Below-knee cast immobilization and the risk of venous thrombosis: results from a large population-based case-control study. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(9):1461–1469. doi: 10.1111/jth.12655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.The burden of venous thromboembolism in Australia Access Economics Pty Limited 2008 1st May.
- 3.Duff J, Walker K, Omari A, Stratton C. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients: analysis of reduced cost and improved clinical outcomes. J Vasc Nurs. 2013;31(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Goldhaber S Z. Venous thromboembolism: epidemiology and magnitude of the problem. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2012;25(3):235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2012.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Galanaud J P, Sevestre-Pietri M A, Bosson J L. et al. Comparative study on risk factors and early outcome of symptomatic distal versus proximal deep vein thrombosis: results from the OPTIMEV study. Thromb Haemost. 2009;102(3):493–500. doi: 10.1160/TH09-01-0053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Spencer F A, Emery C, Joffe S W. et al. Incidence rates, clinical profile, and outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism. The Worcester VTE study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2009;28(4):401–409. doi: 10.1007/s11239-009-0378-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.The Australia and New Zealand Working Party on Management & Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism HEMI Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Best Practice Guidelines for Australia & New Zealand, 4th ed.; 2007 Available at: https://www.surgeons.org/media/19372/VTE_Guidelines.pdf. Accessed August 3, 2014
- 8.Goldhaber S Z Bounameaux H Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis Lancet 2012379(9828):1835–1846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kyrle P A Eichinger S Deep vein thrombosis Lancet 2005365(9465):1163–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.National Guideline C. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Available at: http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=35268. Accessed February 8, 2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Patil S, Gandhi J, Curzon I, Hui A C. Incidence of deep-vein thrombosis in patients with fractures of the ankle treated in a plaster cast. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(10):1340–1343. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B10.19241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Batra S, Kurup H, Gul A, Andrew J G. Thromboprophylaxis following cast immobilisation for lower limb injuries—survey of current practice in United Kingdom. Injury. 2006;37(9):813–817. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Manafi Rasi A, Kazemian G, Emami Moghadam M. et al. Deep vein thrombosis following below knee immobilization: the need for chemoprophylaxis. Trauma Mon. 2013;17(4):367–369. doi: 10.5812/traumamon.9158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Palareti G, Cosmi B, Lessiani G. et al. Evolution of untreated calf deep-vein thrombosis in high risk symptomatic outpatients: the blind, prospective CALTHRO study. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104(5):1063–1070. doi: 10.1160/TH10-06-0351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Riou B, Rothmann C, Lecoules N. et al. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients with nonsurgical isolated lower limb injuries. Am J Emerg Med. 2007;25(5):502–508. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shibuya N, Frost C H, Campbell J D, Davis M L, Jupiter D C. Incidence of acute deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in foot and ankle trauma: analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(1):63–68. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prensky C, Urruela A, Guss M S, Karia R, Lenzo T J, Egol K A. Symptomatic venous thrombo-embolism in low-energy isolated fractures in hospitalised patients. Injury. 2013;44(8):1135–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Caprini J A Risk assessment as a guide for the prevention of the many faces of venous thromboembolism Am J Surg 2010199(1, Suppl):S3–S10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Iqbal H J, Dahab R, Barnes S. UK national survey of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in ankle fracture patients treated with plaster casts. Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;18(3):157–159. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Corp I BM. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ettema H B, Kollen B J, Verheyen C CPM, Büller H R. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with immobilization of the lower extremities: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Haemost. 2008;6(7):1093–1098. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2008.02984.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Solis G, Saxby T. Incidence of DVT following surgery of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(5):411–414. doi: 10.1177/107110070202300507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lapidus L J, Ponzer S, Elvin A. et al. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with Dalteparin during immobilization after ankle fracture surgery: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Acta Orthop. 2007;78(4):528–535. doi: 10.1080/17453670710014185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anderson F A Jr, Spencer F A. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23) 01:I9–I16. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000078469.07362.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Palareti G, Schellong S. Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: what we know and what we are doing. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10(1):11–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04564.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ciuti G, Grifoni E, Pavellini A. et al. Incidence and characteristics of asymptomatic distal deep vein thrombosis unexpectedly found at admission in an Internal Medicine setting. Thromb Res. 2012;130(4):591–595. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.05.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zubrow M T, Urie J, Jurkovitz C. et al. Asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing screening duplex ultrasonography. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(1):19–22. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gillet J L Perrin M R Allaert F A Short-term and mid-term outcome of isolated symptomatic muscular calf vein thrombosis J Vasc Surg 2007463513–519., discussion 519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Macdonald P S, Kahn S R, Miller N, Obrand D. Short-term natural history of isolated gastrocnemius and soleal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(3):523–527. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Prandoni P, Villalta S, Bagatella P. et al. The clinical course of deep-vein thrombosis. Prospective long-term follow-up of 528 symptomatic patients. Haematologica. 1997;82(4):423–428. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fard M N, Mostaan M, Anaraki M R. Utility of lower-extremity duplex sonography in patients with venous thromboembolism. J Clin Ultrasound. 2001;29(2):92–98. doi: 10.1002/1097-0096(200102)29:2<92::AID-JCU1004>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]