Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J Lett. 2016 Dec 20;833(2):L32. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/833/2/L32

The High Resolution Infrared Spectrum of HCl+

J L Doménech 1,, B J Drouin 2, J Cernicharo 3, V J Herrero 4, I Tanarro 4
PMCID: PMC5331965  EMSID: EMS71468  PMID: 28261442

Abstract

The chloroniumyl cation, HCl+, has been recently identified in space from Herschel’s spectra. A joint analysis of extensive vis-UV spectroscopy emission data together with a few high-resolution and high-accuracy millimiter-wave data provided the necessary rest frequencies to support the astronomical identification. Nevertheless, the analysis did not include any infrared (IR) vibration-rotation data. Furthermore, with the end of the Herschel mission, infrared observations from the ground may be one of the few available means to further study this ion in space. In this work, we provide a set of accurate rovibrational transition wavenumbers as well as a new and improved global fit of vis-UV, IR and millimiter-wave spectroscopy laboratory data, that will aid in future studies of this molecule.

Keywords: ISM: molecules, methods: laboratory: molecular, molecular data, techniques:spectroscopic

1. Introduction

The study of interstellar hydrides has received a great push in the recent years, much of it due to observations made from the Herschel Space Observatory. Having relatively large rotational constants, many rotational transitions of hydrides lie in the millimiter- and sub-millimitr wave regions, which are difficult, albeit not impossible, to access from ground-based observatories, even for sites as good as those of ALMA or APEX. Since hydrides are some of the first molecules to form in space from atomic gas and molecular hydrogen, they provide invaluable information about the environment in which they are found (Gerin et al. 2016). Among some of the recent molecules identified in Herschel’s spectra are the chlorine-bearing compounds H2Cl+ (Lis et al. 2010) and HCl+ (DeLuca et al. 2012). The related HCl neutral had already been identified in the interstellar medium by Blake et al. (1985). H2Cl+ has later been detected in a variety of lines of sight (Neufeld et al. 2012, 2015a), both in absorption and emission, also from Herschel’s spectra, and in an extragalactic source in ALMA spectra (Muller et al. 2014). The only published detection of HCl+ that we are aware of is that reported by DeLuca et al. (2012) in the line of sight of the luminous continuum sources W49N and W31C near the galactic center.

The key chemical pathways leading to the formation and destruction of chlorine-containing molecules in the insterstellar medium (ISM) are described in Neufeld & Wolfire (2009) and references therein. Succinctly, since the ionization potential of Cl is 12.8 eV, slightly lower that that of H, chlorine is mostly in ionized form in the diffuse medium, and it is known to react exothermically with H2 to form HCl+. Further reaction with H2 forms H2Cl+, which can produce neutral HCl or Cl upon electron recombination. Chemical models (Neufeld & Wolfire 2009) predict the highest concentrations of HCl+ in regions with low extinction Av ≃ 0.8), with molecular H2 accounting for less than 1 % of the available H.

The identification of HCl+ by DeLuca et al. (2012), relied on the calculated transition frequencies and hyperfine patterns derived from a Dunham-type isotope-independent fit of two sets of laboratory data (Gupta et al. 2012): the first one was an extensive set of vis-UV emission measurements (Sheasley 1972) comprising more that 8000 transitions in the A2Σ − X2Π band of all isotopologues. The precision of those lines was ~ 0.04 cm−1, and the spectral resolution was too low to provide any information on the hyperfine structure (hfs). The second set of data (Gupta et al. 2012) provided 34 accurate frequencies in the millimiter-wave region, resolving the chlorine hyperfine patterns of three rotational transitions for H35Cl+ and H37Cl+. This allowed Gupta et al. (2012) to perform a joint analysis of both sets of data yielding highly accurate predictions, enough to identify the HCl+ transitions in Herschel’s spectra. However, the fit did not contain any rotationally resolved data from vibrational transitions in the ground state. Adding that information to the global fit will improve the accuracy of the predictions of the model for other transitions and may facilitate possible observations in the future in the infrared (IR) region of the spectrum. Indeed, IR observations from ground platforms at high spectral resolution are a way to build up in the study of interstellar hydrides, providing an alternative and complementary tool to the millimiter and sub-millimeter observations, especially now that the Herschel mission is over. The instrument GREAT onboard SOFIA covers the frequency region of the lowest-frequency rotational transitions of H35Cl+ and H37Cl+, although telluric lines at 1441.1 and 1444.0 GHz overlap some of the hyperfine components of the transitions and might hinder the observations. Nevertheless, there are current observation programs of HCl+ with GREAT toward Sgr B2 (M), W31C (G10.6-0.4), G29.96-0.02, W49N, W51, W3(OH), and NGC6334I (Neufeld 2015b, 2016).

In this paper we provide a set of accurate wavenumbers for vibration-rotation transitions of the v = 1 ← 0 band of H35Cl+ and H37Cl+ in the mid-IR, as well as an extended and improved fit with millimeter-wave, optical and IR data. There is one previous laboratory IR study by diode laser spectroscopy, described in a preliminary note (Davies et al. 1986), where 20 fine transitions of H35Cl+ and 13 fine transitions of H37Cl+, were measured with an uncertainty of ±0.002 cm−1. The limited number of observations was most likely due to the patchy coverage of lead salt diode lasers. On account of the much more extensive and accurate set of wavenumbers obtained in this investigation, those results have not been included in the present work.

2. Experimental Details

The apparatus used in this experiment is basically the same that has been used recently for the investigation of the IR spectra of NH3D+ and ArH+ ions (Doménech et al. 2013; Cueto et al. 2014). It is based on an IR difference-frequency laser spectrometer, a hollow-cathode discharge reactor, and a double modulation technique with phase-sensitive detection. The only major change with respect to those previous works is the substitution of the LiNbO3 crystal for a MgO-doped periodically poled LiNbO3 chip with different poling periods, covering without gaps the 1900-4300 cm−1 region when pumped by the 514 nm line of an Ar+ laser, and providing significantly more IR power than our previous setup (~ 1 mW vs. ~ 1μW.) The accuracy and repeatability of the frequency scale rely on the active frequency locking of the Ar+ laser to an hyperfine transition of 127I2, and a high-accuracy wavemeter, calibrated with the same laser, resulting in a 3σ accuracy of 10 MHz (3.3×10−4 cm−1) in the IR frequency scale. The instrumental resolution is ~ 3 MHz (10−4 cm−1), so the observed linewidths are limited by the Doppler effect.

In most of the experiments, the cathode was water-cooled, although, in a second step, some lines were recorded again using a flow of liquid nitrogen. A thermocouple resting at the mid-point of the cathode read ~330 and ~180 K, respectively, under discharge conditions. The plasma was operated in a flow of HCl diluted in He, passed through a dry-ice/ethanol trap to remove possible water traces. The strongest signals were obtained with a partial pressure of He of 1.2 mbar, and a partial pressure of HCl below the resolution of the available capacitance pressure meter (0.001 mbar). The discharge current was 325 mA, with 400 V rms between electrodes. The rest of operating conditions are similar to those reorted in Cueto et al. (2014).

Line positions were calculated with the polynomial expressions given by Sheashley & Mathews (1973), that do not account for any hyperfine splitting, and later they were taken from the prediction available at the JPL database (Pickett et. al 1998; Pearson et. al 2010), entry c036005, with frequencies for all hyperfine components. The accuracy was high enough to find the lines within less than 0.02 cm−1 from their expected positions. Between 6 and 200 scans were averaged for each line, depending on its intensity, attaining signal-to-noise ratios between 10 and 500. The investigated region spanned the 2337-2774 cm−1 interval. Atmospheric CO2 absorption hampered the detection at lower frequencies (higher-J lines in the P-branch), and we kept a similar J″ range for the R-branch. No attempt was made to cancel the earth’s magnetic field in the experiments (44.6 μT in Madrid), since the calculation of Zeeman energies by Cheng et al. (2007) showed a worst-case splitting (that of the 2Π3/2 Q(3/2) lines) of only 3 MHz, much smaller than their Doppler width.

3. Spectroscopic Results

3.1. The spectrum of HCl+

The energy levels structure of HCl+ has been described in previous papers (e.g. Gupta et al. 2012, and references therein), so we just summarize it here. The ground electronic state of HCl+ is 2Π, so there is electron spin and orbital angular momenta interaction, originating two ladders of levels with Ω = |Λ + Σ| … |Λ − Σ| = 3/2, 1/2. Since the ratio of the constants A/B is -66, it is an inverted doublet (the Ω = 3/2 state lies lower in energy —by ~ 643 cm−1) that can be well described by Hund’s coupling case a. Levels in each ladder are split by Λ-doubling into e and f parity doublets that are further split into hyperfine components because of the interaction with the nuclear spins (I35Cl = I37Cl = 3/2, IH = 1/2). The selection rules ee, ff for ΔJ = ±1 and ef, fe for ΔJ = 0 thus give rise to P, Q and R branches with four lines for each rotational transition. These lines split into multiplets due to the hfs of the levels (F = |J + I| … |JI|) arising from the interaction with the Cl nucleus spin. In low-J transitions, the hfs is clearly evident, although not completely resolvable, and its amplitude rapidly diminishes as J increases. Figure 1a shows an example of lines where the hyperfine components cannot be resolved due to their proximity and the Doppler broadening of the lines. In turn, Figure 1b shows the 2Π3/2P(3/2)f line of H35Cl+ line recorded at ~ 180 K, where the hfs is almost completely resolved. There are intermediate cases where the hfs manifests as broadening or asymmetries of the lines, an example is shown in Figure 1c. In this case, both e and f components of the 2Π3/2P(3/2) line of H37Cl+ overlap, and, together with the hfs, yield a complex, unresolved asymmetric profile. The same line in the Ω = 1/2 ladder is split into e and f components, also with an asymmetric profile (the f component is outside the frequency range of the figure). It must be noted that the proton hfs could not be resolved in the THz study by Gupta et al. (2012). In the present work, we access lines more sensitive to this interaction, but, as could be expected from the larger Doppler widths and the magnitude of the splittings predicted by theory (Bruna & Grein 2006), we have not been able to resolve it either, and only the Cl hyperfine interaction has been considered.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Absorption lines of HCl+. In all panels, the bottom trace is a stick spectrum as derived from the fit showing the hfs, and the top trace is the experimental observation. (a) The middle trace is the convolution of the stick spectrum with a Gaussian function of 0.0065 cm−1 FWHM. (b) The numbers on the top of the sticks are the total angular momentum quantum numbers F′F″. The group of lines marked with an asterisk correspond to 2Π3/2Q(9/2)f. The middle trace is the stick spectrum convolved with a Gaussian function of 0.0055 cm−1 FWHM. (c) The middle trace is the convolution of the stick spectrum with a Gaussian function of 0.0055 cm−1 FWHM. In this case, the e and f components in the Ω = 3/2 ladder are not resolved, unlike those in the Ω = 1/2 ladder.

From the line width of a Gaussian profile fitted to unresolved transitions with negligible hfs broadening, we have obtained kinetic temperatures of ~ 400 K for the spectra recorded with water cooling, and ~ 270 K for those with liquid nitrogen cooling. The ratio of intensities of different J lines under rotational equilibrium is also in agreement with this estimation. The ratio of intensities of lines with the same J in Ω = 1/2, 3/2 leads to a much higher spin temperature, near ~ 750 K, as can be inferred from the higher intensity of the Ω = 1/2 lines as compared with the calculations assuming Boltzmann equilibrium in Figures 1a and 1c. This is not surprising since there is no reason to expect an equilibrium between rotational, vibrational, or spin temperatures in a plasma. Moreover, Gupta et al. (2012) also observed a high spin temperature, and the emission data from Sheasley (1972) showed vibrational excitation up to v = 9. No hotband lines were recorded, thus we cannot give an estimate of the vibrational temperature of HCl+ in the discharge.

The list of assignments and observed IR frequencies, together with those calculated and their residuals after the fit (see the Appendix), is given in Table 1.

Table 1.

Quantum number assignments, observed and calculated wavenumbers, and their differences for the υ = 1 − 0 band of HCl+ in the ground electronic state.

A(Cl)a N′ J+12 F′ N″ J+12 F″ Parity νobs/cm−1 σb/10−5cm−1 νcalc/cm−1 (νobsνcalc/10−5cm−1
37 1 1 2 2 2 2 f − f 2536.09722 30 2536.09701 21.3
37 1 1 2 2 2 1 f − f 2536.10792 36 2536.10792 -0.3
37 1 1 2 2 2 3 e − e 2536.67608 40 2536.67600 7.9
35 1 1 2 2 2 3 e − e 2538.49530 30 2538.49519 10.6
35 8 9 8 9 f − e 2543.90798 30 2543.90823 -25.3
35 8 9 8 9 e − f 2544.52117 30 2544.52074 43.3
35 1 1 1 1 1 1 e − f 2568.54858c 30 * 2568.54624 33.9
35 1 1 1 1 1 2 e − f 2568.54858c 30 * 2568.54893 -35.3

NOTEN = J − Ω. The e, f parity labeling follows the convention of Brown et al. (1975). Only transitions with resolved hfs have F quantum numbers assigned.

a

Chlorine mass number.

b

Experimental uncertainty (1σ).

c

An asterisk(*) flags transitions fitted as intensity weighted doublets.

This table is published in its entirety in the electronic edition of the Journal. A portion is shown here for guidance regarding its form and content.

3.2. Band constants

A new combined isotope-independent fit with THz, optical, and IR data was carried out and is described in the Appendix. Using the Dunham equations and the correlated error propagation formulae, the band parameters can be determined directly from the fit (Yu et al. 2012), and are given in Table 2. In this format, comparisons to other data analyses in the literature are possible. A few things are remarkable: (1) the value of AD0 is in much better agreement with Brown et al. (1979) than with any other study, including Gupta et al. (2012); (2) the values are generally of slightly lower precision than Gupta et al., opposite to the trend observed in the Dunham fit (see the Appendix.) The former result is presumably due to Brown’s careful approximations of higher-order parameters. The latter may be due to truncation error in the prior analysis in which parameter uncertainties are underestimated when higher-order parameters that are not well approximated as zero are not included in the analysis. When these terms are introduced they have uncertainty and this correlates with the prior uncertainties.

Table 2.

Spectroscopic constants of H35Cl+ in the X2IIstate (in MHz).

Constant This work Gupta et al. (2012) Brown et al. (1979) Saenger et al. (1976) Bruna & Grein (2006)
ν0 77003804.2(21) 77003551(75) 77005284(99)
γ0 −8882(40) −9163(34) −8993(165) −9114
γ1 −8882(40) −9163(34)
A0 −19279455.6(47) −19279138(38) −19278775(1000) −19430419 (92) −18137444
A1 −19264103.2(47) −19263430(69) −19417878(138)
AD0 45.0(12) 54.33(99) 45.3(42) 62.60(48)
AD1 68.9(12) 80.98(113) 84.03(75)
AH0 0.01853(113)
AH1 0.01853(113)
B0 293443.752(64) 293444.013(48) 293420.5(60) 293607.7(23)
B1 283806.268(103) 283812.603(324) 283959.2(30)
D0 16.39011(163) 16.39759(157) 16.419(13)
D1 16.16813(186) 16.20489(518) 16.161(18)
104 H0 4.823(103) 4.468(126) 4.57(23)
104 H1 4.823(103) 4.468(126) 4.22(32)
p0 18281.2(10) 18280.17(104) 18279.60(94) 18259(12)
p1 17983.9(11) 17972.6(471) 17953(17) 17598
pD0 -1.266(24) −1.290(25)b −0.975(51)
pD1 -1.266(24) −1.290(25) −0.932(98)
104 pH0 5.80(150) 6.16(172)
104 pH1 5.80(150) 6.16(172)
q0 −332.76(12) −332.198(87) −343.0(11) −335.1(18) −360
q1 −320.03(18) −320.72(210) −318.7(33)
qD0 0.04052(326) 0.04106(478) 0.0470(60)
qD1 0.04052(326) 0.04106(478) 0.017(12)
ha 357.2(18) 357.04(60) 369.5
a 409.10(113) 409.16(88) 408
ba 167.4(38) 169.6(34) 166
bF 77.0(36) 78.34(254) 85
c -271.2(51) -274.64(313) -243
d 521.56(256) 523.12(282) 489
103 dD 88.8(540) 60.6(414)
eQq0 -9.67(301) -8.03(210) -12.5
eQq2 -351.6(272) -370.4(184) -169

NOTE—Due to lack of expansion, many higher order terms, in both υ = 0 and υ = 1, are equivalent to their corresponding Dunham term (γ=Y00γ,H=Y03,AH=Y02A,pD=Y01p/2,pH=Y02p/2andqD=Y01q/2.) Hyperfine structure parameters are the same for υ = 0 and υ = 1.

a

Probably a misprint in Gupta et al. (2012).

b

Calculated using h = a + (b + c)/2 and b = bFc/3.

4. Opacities

Using the Einstein A coefficient for the v = 0 ← 1 transition of 205.6 s−1 calculated by Pradhan et al. (1991), we can obtain the vibrational transition dipole moment (0.1959 D) and the individual line intensities as a function of temperature. With this information, it is possible to estimate the detectable column densities in hypothetical IR observations from the ground. For 5 K (the estimated excitation temperature of HCl+ in the clouds toward W31C and W94N (DeLuca et al. 2012)), the strongest IR absorption of 35HCl+ would be that of the 2Π3/2 Q(3/2) transition at 2568.21258 cm−1(76,993,076 MHz). Neglecting hfs and Λ doubling (that would not be observed for this line even with resolving powers R≫100000), we obtain the following integrated intensities (in units of cm2 kms−1molec−1) α(T) = 2.874 × 10−15, 2.743 × 10−15 and 1.975 × 10−15 for temperatures T = 5, 20 and 50 K, respectively. DeLuca et al. (2012) estimated the column densities to be N(35HCl+) = 8.2 ± 2.5 × 1013 cm2 molec−1 for W31C and N(35HCl+) = 8.7 ± 2.6 × 1013 cm2 molec−1 for W49N. The observed absorption peak intensity will depend inversely on the observed linewidth, that, in turn, will depend on the velocity spread of the cloud and the spectrograph resolution. DeLuca et al. (2012) found Δv ~ 1.5 − 4.5 km s−1 from the analysis of the hfs of the lines of HCl+, in good agreement with the Δv = 4.2 ± 1.5 kms−1 derived by Godard et al. (2012) from SH+ and CH+ in the same and other similar diffuse clouds. For an instrument line width of 3 kms−1 (that of spectrographs with a resolving power of R = 100, 000, as available from e.g. CRIRES+ 1 at the VLT in Paranal or TEXES at Mauna Kea) the combined line width would be ~ 6 kms−1, and one can expect peak absorptions of 3.85, 3.60, and 2.64 %, respectively, for the above temperatures and a column density of N = 8 × 1013 cm2 molec−1. Infrared emission from the dust envelope around the proto-stars in those sources can be bright enough in the IR, and, indeed, the absorption of neutral HCl toward CRL2136 at 3 − 4 μm with peak intensities of ~ 2% has been reported by Goto et al. (2013), using the CRIRES instrument at the VLT. Therefore, the absorptions estimated above should be clearly detectable against bright IR sources in a reasonable amount of observing time.

5. Concluding Remarks

We have provided accurate wavenumber measurements of 183 vibration-rotation lines of H35Cl+ and H37Cl+, measured with a difference-frequency laser spectrometer in a hollow-cathode discharge cell. The new wavenumbers have improved the previous Dunham-type fit to optical and millimiter-wave data, allowing more accurate predictions of other transitions. Notably, the wavenumbers of the 2Π3/2 Q(3/2)) transitions of the v = 1 − 0 band are 2568.21258±0.00031 and 2566.34959±0.00032 cm−1(±3σ) for H35Cl+ and H37Cl+, respectively. These wavenumbers should help in future searches for these molecules. In the conditions of the diffuse clouds where this ion has been observed with Herschel, absorptions of a few percent should be observable from the ground with highresolution IR telescopes.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

Acknowledgments

JLD, JC, VJH and IT acknowledge the financial support from the Spanish MINECO through the Consolider ASTRO-MOL project, grant CSD2009-00038, and from the ERC through the Synergy Grant ERC-2013-SyG NANOCOS-MOS. Additional support through grants FIS2012-38175 (JLD), FIS2013-408087-C2-1P (VJH, IT) and AYA2012-32032 (JC) is also acknowledged. We thank J.R. Goicoechea for his reading and comments on the manuscript. Portions of the research described in this paper were performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Government sponsorship acknowledged.

Footnotes

1

expected to be fully operational in 2018

Contributor Information

J. L. Doménech, Molecular Physics Department, Instituto de Estructura de la Materia (IEM-CSIC), Serrano 123. E-28006 Madrid, Spain

B. J. Drouin, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109-8099, USA

J. Cernicharo, Molecular Astrophysics Group, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM-CSIC), Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain

References

  1. Blake GA, Keene J, Phillips TG. ApJ. 1985;295:501. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown JM, Hougen JT, Huber K-P, et al. JMoSp. 1975;55:500. [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown JM, Watson JKG. JMoSp. 1977;65:65. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown JM, Colbourn EA, Watson JKG, et al. JMoSp. 1979;74:294. [Google Scholar]
  5. Bruna PJ, Grein F. MolPh. 2006;104:429. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheng M, Brown JM, Rosmus P, et al. PhRvA. 2007;75:012502. [Google Scholar]
  7. Cueto M, Cernicharo J, Barlow M, et al. ApJL. 2014;783:L5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Davies PB, Hamilton PA, Johnson SA. MolPh. 1986;57:217. [Google Scholar]
  9. DeLuca M, Gupta H, Neufeld D, et al. ApJL. 2012;751:L37. [Google Scholar]
  10. Doménech JL, Cueto M, Herrero VJ, et al. ApJL. 2013;771:L11. [Google Scholar]
  11. Drouin BJ, Miller CE, Müller HSP, et al. JMoSp. 2001;205:128. doi: 10.1006/jmsp.2000.8252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerin M, Neufeld DA, Goicoechea JR. ARA&A. 2016;54:181. [Google Scholar]
  13. Godard B, Falgarone E, Gerin M, et al. A&A. 2012;540:A87. [Google Scholar]
  14. Goto M, Usuda T, Geballe TR, et al. A&A. 2013;558:L5. doi: 10.1021/jp400017s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta H, Drouin B, Pearson JC. ApJL. 2012;751:L38. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lis DC, Pearson JC, Neufels DA. A&A. 2010;521:L9. [Google Scholar]
  17. Muller S, Black JH, Guélin M, et al. A&A. 2014;566:L6. [Google Scholar]
  18. Neufeld DA, Wolfire MG. ApJ. 2009;706:1594. [Google Scholar]
  19. Neufeld DA, Roueff E, Snell RL, et al. ApJ. 2012;748:37. [Google Scholar]
  20. Neufeld DA, Black JH, Gerin M, et al. ApJ. 2015;807:54. [Google Scholar]
  21. Neufeld D. SOFIA Proposal, Cycle 4, ID. 04_0020. 2015 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015sofi.prop…20N. [Google Scholar]
  22. Neufeld D. SOFIA Proposal, Cycle 5, ID. 05_0016. 2016 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016sofi.prop…16N. [Google Scholar]
  23. Pearson JC, Müller HSP, Pickett HM, et al. JQSRT. 2010;111:1614. [Google Scholar]
  24. Pickett HM. JMoSp. 1991;148:371. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pickett HM, Poynter RL, Cohen EA, et al. JQRST. 1998;60:883. see also http://spec.jpl.nasa.gov/. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pradhan AD, Kirby KP, Dalgarno a. JChPh. 1991;95:9009. [Google Scholar]
  27. Saenger KL, Zare RN, Mathews CW. JMoSp. 1976;61:216. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sheasley WD. PhD Dissertation. The Ohio State University; Ann Arbor, Michigan: 1972. University Microfilms. 73-11, 575. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sheasley WD, Mathews CW. JMoSp. 1973;47:420. [Google Scholar]
  30. Yu S, Miller CE, Drouin BJ, et al. JChPh. 2012;137:024304. doi: 10.1063/1.4719170. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

RESOURCES