Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 2;7:43736. doi: 10.1038/srep43736

Inhibition of Proliferation and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells by Heavy Chain-Hyaluronan/Pentraxin 3

Hua He 1,a,*, Ajay E Kuriyan 2,3,*, Chen-Wei Su 1, Megha Mahabole 1, Yuan Zhang 4, Ying-Ting Zhu 1, Harry W Flynn 2, Jean-Marie Parel 2, Scheffer C G Tseng 1,4,b
PMCID: PMC5333089  PMID: 28252047

Abstract

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is mediated by proliferation and epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Because heavy chain-hyaluronic acid/pentraxin 3 (HC-HA/PTX3) purified from human amniotic membrane exerts anti-inflammatory and anti-scarring actions, we hypothesized that HC-HA/PTX3 could inhibit these PVR-related processes in vitro. In this study, we first optimized an ARPE-19 cell culture model to mimic PVR by defining cell density, growth factors, and cultivation time. Using this low cell density culture model and HA as a control, we tested effects of HC-HA/PTX3 on the cell viability (cytotoxicity), proliferation (EGF + FGF-2) and EMT (TGF-β1). Furthermore, we determined effects of HC-HA/PTX3 on cell migration (EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1) and collagen gel contraction (TGF-β1). We found both HA and HC-HA/PTX3 were not toxic to unstimulated RPE cells. Only HC-HA/PTX3 dose-dependently inhibited proliferation and EMT of stimulated RPE cells by down-regulating Wnt (β-catenin, LEF1) and TGF-β (Smad2/3, collagen type I, α-SMA) signaling, respectively. Additionally, HA and HC-HA/PTX3 inhibited migration but only HC-HA/PTX3 inhibited collagen gel contraction. These results suggest HC-HA/PTX3 is a non-toxic, potent inhibitor of proliferation and EMT of RPE in vitro, and HC-HA/PTX3’s ability to inhibit PVR formation warrants evaluation in an animal model.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is characterized by membranes that develop on the surface of the retina in 5–10% of cases following rhegmatogenous retinal detachments1,2. Recurrent retinal detachments with PVR require additional surgical interventions and are associated with a poor visual outcome3. Prevention of PVR development during the initial retinal detachment repair could potentially improve the success rates and visual outcomes. Previous clinical studies have examined the use of triamcinolone acetonide4, heparin5, low molecular weight heparin6,7,8, 5-fluorouracil6,7,8, and daunorubicin9. However, none of these adjuvant pharmacologic therapies has shown consistent effectiveness in decreasing re-detachment rates or improving visual outcomes in patients with retinal detachments.

The main cellular components of PVR membranes are retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells10. A large body of evidence shows that vitreal growth factors and inflammatory cytokines drive the formation of PVR membranes11. Retinal breaks can result in RPE cells dispersing into the vitreous cavity where they are exposed to vitreous growth factors, such as transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and inflammatory cytokines12,13,14. These growth factors and cytokines drive RPE cells to survive, proliferate, and undergo pathologic epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) in a non-physiologic environment15,16,17,18,19.

Amniotic membrane (AM) has advanced the treatment of inflammatory and disordered wound healing processes in ocular surface diseases such as corneal scars, burns, infections, autoimmune processes, and post-surgery, in part by regulating TGF-β signaling20,21. Studies have demonstrated that AMs inhibit several aspects of pro-inflammatory, pro-proliferative, and pro-EMT processes, including expression of TGF-β receptors I, II, and III20,22,23. Furthermore, AMs inhibit downstream TGF-β signaling cascade targets, which are essential for EMT, including expression of alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), alternatively spliced domain A (EDA)-containing fibronectin (Fn), and integrin20,22,23. Additionally, AM extract can reverse TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation in vitro24 and AM can suppress corneal opacities in a rabbit model25. Recently, we have successfully purified and characterized heavy chain-hyaluronic acid/pentraxin 3 (HC-HA/PTX3) from human AM as a unique matrix responsible for AM’s anti-inflammatory, anti-scarring and anti-angiogenic therapeutic actions26,27,28,29,30,31. As recently reviewed32, HC-HA/PTX3 is formed by tight association between pentraxin 3 (PTX3) and HC-HA, which consists of high molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronic acid (HA) covalently linked to heavy chain 1 (HC1) of inter-α-trypsin inhibitor (IαI) through the catalytic action of tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6). We have reported that HC-HA/PTX3 suppresses pro-inflammatory responses by inducing apoptosis of activated but not resting neutrophils (by fMLP or LPS) and macrophages (by LPS or/and IFN-γ)29; promoting polarization of M2 macrophages29; suppressing Th1 cells while promoting the expansion of regulatory T cells30. In addition, HC-HA/PTX3 inhibits scarring by downregulating mRNA expression of TGF-β127 and protein expression of TGF-β1, TGFβRI, and TGFβRII in human corneal fibroblasts (our unpublished data). Furthermore, HC-HA/PTX3 suppresses HUVEC viability, proliferation and VEGF-induced tube formation26. Therefore, we would like to test the hypothesis that HC-HA/PTX3 can be an exciting potential biologic for preventing PVR formation.

Results

Optimization of an in vitro cell culture-based PVR model

Previously, we had established an in vitro cell culture-based model to discern the signaling pathways controlling proliferation and EMT, i.e., the two hallmarks of PVR, in human ARPE-19 cells33. In that model, post-confluent ARPE-19 cells were treated with EGTA before stimulation by epidermal growth factor (EGF) + fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) or EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1 to induce proliferation and EMT, respectively. However, we thought that this model might not fully recapitulate PVR conditions in vivo because RPE cells initially dispersed into the vitreous cavity are likely to be at a low density when they are exposed to a variety of growth factors and cytokines, including EGF, FGF-2, and TGF-β1.

To modify this model33, we first examined the cell seeding density, the culture medium DMEM/F12 with 10% FBS or without FBS (serum free or SF), and the cultivation time to promote proliferation of ARPE-19 cells without EGF and FGF-2. We found that ARPE-19 cells at 1 × 104/cm2 proliferated well, as measured by BrdU labeling, in the DMEM/F12/10% FBS during 24 h to 120 h of cultivation. In contrast, cells seeded at higher density of 2 × 104/cm2 and 3 × 104/cm2 barely proliferated during the same period (Fig. 1A), likely due to cell contact inhibition. Unexpectedly, ARPE-19 cells in DMEM/F12/SF proliferated more than those in DMEM/F12/10% FBS (Fig. 1A). This unusual phenomenon had also been reported in other studies34,35. Jun et al.34 showed serum starvation of ARPE-19 cells for 24 hours caused rapid induction of c-met and HGF mRNA and protein expression. ARPE-19 cell proliferation was also enhanced with recombinant HGF treatment. Neutralization against c-Met inhibited the proliferation of serum-deprived ARPE-19 by 64.5% (n = 9, S.D. 5.5%). Therefore, this unusual proliferation might be attributed to the activation of HGF and its receptor c-Met during serum starvation. However, we found the proliferation in ARPE-19 cells in the DMEM/F12/SF at all three cell seeding densities decreased during 72 h to 120 h of cultivation, suggesting that prolonged serum starvation might induce cell death or differentiation.

Figure 1. Proliferation affected by seeding density and culture time.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) ARPE-19 cells in DMEM/F-12 medium with 10% FBS (FBS) or serum-free (SF) were seeded at 1 × 104/cm2, 2 × 104/cm2, and 3 × 104/cm2 and incubated for 24–120 h. Proliferation was assayed with BrdU labeling (4 h) followed by BrdU ELISA. (B,C) The same as A except that cells were seeded at 0.25 × 104/cm2, 0.5 × 104/cm2, and 1 × 104/cm2 in DMEM/F-12/10% FBS (B) or DMEM/F-12/SF (C) and stimulated with EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) (EGF + FGF-2) for 48 h. (n = 4, *indicates p < 0.05 when compared at the same cultivation time (A) or compared with the lower density in the same treatment group or at the same density between groups treated with PBS and EGF + FGF-2 (B,C).

We then tested the proliferation of ARPE-19 cells under even lower cell seeding densities (0.25 × 104/cm2, 0.5 × 104/cm2, and 1 × 104/cm2) and a shortened cultivation period (48 h) in DMEM/F12/10% FBS or DMEM/F12/SF and stimulated by EGF + FGF-2. We found that the cell proliferation measured by BrdU labeling in DMEM/F12/10% FBS induced by EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) was cell density-dependent. The proliferation was significantly induced by EGF + FGF-2 at 0.5 × 104/cm2 and 1 × 104/cm2 (p = 0.02 and 0.002, respectively) but not at 0.25 × 104/cm2 (p = 0.07) when compared to the PBS control (Fig. 1B). Between the cell seeding densities of 0.5 × 104/cm2 and 1 × 104/cm2, the proliferation induced by EGF + FGF was about the same (83.7 ± 1.5% vs 83.9 ± 1.0%). In the DMEM/F12/SF, proliferation was only significantly induced by EGF + FGF-2 at 1 × 104/cm2 (p = 0.005) (Fig. 1C). For consistency, we chose 1 × 104/cm2 and DMEM/F12/10% FBS for the remaining experiments, since these culture conditions led to the largest amount of ARPE-19 cell proliferation.

Next, we compared the ability of EGF + FGF-2 with that by the “core factors (CFs)” (18 growth factors and cytokines [Table 1] which have been identified in the vitreous samples of PVR patients and demonstrated to induce PVR when injected intravitreally into normal rabbits11,18) in promoting proliferation of ARPE-19 cells. We found EGF + FGF-2, EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1, the “CFs” without (w/o) TGF-β1, 2, 3, and the “CFs” all induced significant proliferation in ARPE-19 cells when compared with that with PBS (Fig. 2A, p = 8.1 × 10−5, 0.003, 0.0003, 0.001, respectively, and *indicates p < 0.05). Among these, EGF + FGF-2 induced higher proliferation than that by the “CFs” w/o TGF-βs and “CFs” (p = 0.002 and 0.0001, respectively, and # also indicates p < 0.05, Fig. 2A), but not that by EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1 (p > 0.05). In addition, TGF-β1 or TGF-β1, 2, 3 did not significantly inhibit EGF + FGF-2-induced proliferation of ARPE-19 cells (p > 0.05). These results show that EGF + FGF-2 induced even more proliferation in ARPE-19 cells in vitro than the “CFs”.

Table 1. The commercial sources and doses of 18 growth factors and cytokines, designated as the “core factors” as reported by Pennock et al.36.

Growth factor Type Vendor Catalog number Effective In vitro dose Dose used in this study
VEGF human R & D Systems 293-VE 2–50 ng/ml 50 ng/ml
PDGF-A human R & D Systems 221-AA 2–50 ng/ml 12.5 ng/ml
PDGF-AB human R & D Systems 222-AB 2–50 ng/ml 50 ng/ml
PDGF-B human R & D Systems 220-GMP 2–50 ng/ml 12.5 ng/ml
PDGF-C human R & D Systems 1687-CC 2–50 ng/ml 6.3 ng/ml
CTGF human Invitrogen PHG0286 2–50 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
EGF human R & D Systems 236-EG 5–50 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
FGF-2 human R & D Systems 233-FB 2–50 ng/ml 20 ng/ml
G-CSF human PeproTech AF-300-23 5–75 ng/ml 50 ng/ml
HGF human R & D Systems 294-HGN 2–50 ng/ml 20 ng/ml
IFN-γ human PeproTech AF-300-02 0.5–25 ng/ml 5 ng/ml
IGF1 human R & D Systems 291-G1 2–50 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
IL-6 human R & D Systems 200-06 0.2–10 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
MCP-1 human PeproTech AF-300-04 10–100 ng/ml 100 ng/ml
TGF-α human PeproTech AF-100-16A 5–50 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
TGF-β1 human PeproTech AF-100-21C 2–20 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
TGF-β2 human PeproTech 100-35 2–20 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
TGF-β3 human PeproTech AF-100-36E 2–20 ng/ml 10 ng/ml
Open in a new tab

Figure 2. Proliferation and EMT affected by EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1 and the “core factors” (CFs).

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(A) BrdU labeling (A, n = 3, *indicates p < 0.05 compared to the PBS control and # indicates p < 0.05 compared to EGF + FGF-2) and immunostaining α-SMA (B, nuclear counterstaining with Hoechst 33342, scale bar = 50 μm) of ARPE-19 cells seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 in DMEM/F12/10% FBS for 24 h and then treated with PBS or EGF (10 ng/ml) + FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) (EGF + FGF-2), TGF-β1, β2, β3 (each at 10 ng/ml), or CFs (see Table 1) for 48 h.

Finally, we compared the ability of TGF-βs and the “CFs” to induce EMT. There was a weak but positive α-SMA immunostaining detected in ARPE-19 cells cultured in DMEM/F12/10% FBS (Fig. 2B). However, much stronger staining of α-SMA was induced by TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml). Even stronger staining of α-SMA was seen with the addition of TGF-β2 (10 ng/ml) and TGF-β3 (10 ng/ml). In contrast, EGF + FGF-2 dramatically inhibited the expression of α-SMA induced by TGF-β1; the “CFs” with or without TGF-β did not effectively induce α-SMA expression.

Taken together, we have modified our previous cell culture-based model to induce proliferation and EMT in ARPE-19 cells at a low density (1 × 104/cm2) in DMEM/F12/10% FBS under the stimulation with EGF + FGF-2 and TGF-β1 (or together with TGF-β2 and TGF-β3), respectively, for as short as 48 h.

Biochemical analysis of HC-HA/PTX3 purified from human AM

To demonstrate the reproducible manufacturing process of HC-HA/PTX3, we had prepared HC-HA/PTX3 from three lots of human AM according to our published method27 under the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) standard. The content of HA in each lot of HC-HA/PTX3 was 19.6 μg/ml, 21.6 μg/ml, and 26.0 μg/ml, respectively (22.4 ± 2.7 μg/ml) with HMW HA size (>4000 kDa, data not shown) while the total protein in each lot of HC-HA/PTX3 was below the detection limit (25 μg/ml), in agreement with our previous report27. Western blot analysis showed both HC1 and PTX3 were present in each lot and HC1 was released after the digestion with hyaluronidase (HAase), confirming their identity of freshly prepared HC-HA/PTX3 in two weeks designated as 0 month (Fig. 3A and B). After being stored at −80 °C for about six months (6 m) and 12 months (12 m) in a lyophilized form, the identity of this HC-HA/PTX3 did not change (Fig. 3A and B), indicating the stability of HC-HA/PTX3 was at least 12 months. These three lots of HC-HA/PTX3 were used within a 12 month period in the remaining experiments.

Figure 3. The biochemical characterization of purified HC-HA/PTX3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

HC-HA/PTX3 purified from three donor lots (10 μg of HA each) was digested without (−) or with (+) hyaluronidase (1 U/μg HA) at 37 °C for 1 h and analyzed by Western blot for HC1 (A, using purified human IαI as the control that released HC1 after being treated with 100 mM NaOH at ~25 °C for 1 h), and PTX3 (B, using human recombinant PTX3 as the control). For examining the stability, lyophilized HC-HA/PTX3 was stored at −80 °C for 6 months (6 m) and 12 months (12 m), followed by Western blot (as described above) to check the integrity of HC1 (A) and PTX3 (B). Note: for the clarity, some unused blank lanes were cut off. The full images of all blots were present and exposure (brightness and contrast) was applied to the whole image.

HC-HA/PTX3 but not HA specifically and dose-dependently inhibits proliferation of RPE cells induced by EGF and FGF-2

We first determined whether HC-HA/PTX3 (1.56 to 200 μg/ml) was toxic to ARPE-19 cells (without stimulation by EGF and FGF-2) by the MTT assay. Microscopic observation did not reveal any noticeable morphological changes or cell death after HC-HA/PTX3 treatment for 24 h–48 h when compared to the PBS control. However, the MTT assay indicated a severe cytotoxicity by HC-HA/PTX3 starting at 3.13 μg/ml (Fig. 4A), which was correlated with a dramatic increase of needle-like crystals in cells (data not shown). MTT is membrane impermeable and taken up by cells through endocytosis. Reduced MTT formazan accumulates in the endosomal/lysosomal compartment before being transported to the cell surface through exocytosis37 to generate needle-like formazan crystals38. Such endocytosis of MTT does not cause obvious lesions but induces cell death39. So, we speculate that HC-HA/PTX3 might enhance the endocytosis of MTT to cause this artifact of cytotoxicity. To overcome this pitfall, we then chose WST-1 assay because, unlike MTT, WST-1 is converted to a soluble formazan and diffuses outside of cells freely. Our repeated experiments confirmed no cytotoxicity by HA and HC-HA/PTX3 (up to 200 μg/ml) in unstimulated ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 4B and C). To further confirm this result, we performed the additional test using a Cell Death Detection ELISA (Roche, cat# 11544675001), which determines histone-associated DNA fragments generated by cell death. Cell lysates of normal ARPE-19 cells (e.g., not stimulated by EGF, FGF-2, or TGF-β1) after 48-hour treatment with a series of HA or HC-HA/PTX3 were collected separately and assayed. The data shows that both HA (0–100 μg/ml) and HC-HA/PTX3 (0–100 μg/ml) do not cause cell death of normal ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 4D). In addition, we also tested the cytotoxicity of HC-HA/PTX3 in a rabbit PVR model by intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml of HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, or 75 μg/ml) into each eye. Both weekly electroretinography (ERG) and fundus monitor (for 4 weeks) did not show any abnormal effect in HC-HA/PTX3 treatment groups when compared with PBS treatment group. Histopathology results also confirmed this finding (Kuriyan et al., ARVO 2016, poster number:1126). Therefore, in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that HC-HA/PTX3 is not toxic to normal RPE cells.

Figure 4. Cytotoxicity and proliferation measured by MTT and WST-1.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Cytotoxicity- ARPE-19 cells seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 were treated with an increasing doses of HC-HA/PTX3 or HA for 48 h before being measured by MTT (A), WST-1 (B,C), or cell death detection ELISA (D). Proliferation - In a separate experiment, ARPE-19 cells (E,F) or primary human RPE cells (G) were seeded and treated similarly as in cytotoxicity except the cells were also stimulated by EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) (n = 3, *indicates p < 0.05 compared with the PBS control).

Because BrdU labeling could not accurately measure proliferation when cells reached a high density (Fig. 1A), we thus examined whether the WST-1 assay could overcome this limitation. When ARPE-19 cells were seeded at non-confluent cell densities, i.e., from 0.03125 × 104/cm2 to 2 × 104/cm2, both WST-1 assay (R2 = 0.9986) and BrdU ELISA (R2 = 0.9591) gave a good linear relationship. In contrast, when ARPE-19 cells were seeded at the confluent cell density (4 × 104/cm2), the WST-1 assay (R2 = 0.9721) was superior to BrdU ELISA (R2 = 0.8429) because of its good linearity. Therefore, we used the WST-1 assay to measure cell proliferation thereafter. In doing so, we found that HC-HA/PTX3 (Fig. 4E) but not HA (Fig. 4F), starting from 3.13 μg/ml, significantly inhibited proliferation of ARPE-19 cells induced by EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) compared with the cells treated with PBS, EGF and FGF-2 (p < 0.05 and indicated by*). The finding that HC-HA/PTX3 was not toxic to unstimulated RPE cells but inhibited proliferation of RPE cells under stimulation of EGF + FGF-2 was also verified in primary human RPE cells (Fig. 4G).

HC-HA/PTX3 inhibits migration induced by EGF, FGF-2, and TGF-β1 and collagen gel contraction induced by TGF-β1

RPE cells migrate during EMT40,41 and participate in contraction42,43 of epiretinal membranes11,44. We thus examined these two PVR-related cell behaviors in vitro. Our results showed that HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) as well as HA (25 μg/ml) completely suppressed the migration of ARPE-19 cells under stimulation by EGF (10 ng/ml), FGF-2 (20 ng/ml), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) (Fig. 5A). In contrast, HC-HA/PTX3, but not HA, significantly reduced the TGF-β1-induced collagen gel contraction in both ARPE-19 cells and primary human RPE cells (Fig. 5B).

Figure 5. Inhibition of RPE cell migration and collagen gel contraction by HC-HA/PTX3.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(A) (migration). ARPE-19 cells (2 × 106/ml) treated with PBS (vehicle control), HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) were in the upper compartment while DMEM/F12 without or with EGF (10 ng/ml), FGF-2 (20 ng/ml), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) were in the lower compartment of transwell wells. After incubation for 8 h, the number of migrated cells were counted from six random microscopic fields (n = 4, *indicates p < 0.05 when compared with PBS + EGF + FGF-2 + TGF-β1). (B) (collagen gel contraction). ARPE-19 cells or primary human RPE cells (5 × 105/ml) without or with TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) and treated with PBS (vehicle control), HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) were on the top of collagen gel. The percentage of gel contraction was determined by measuring the gel size at 72 h when compared to the initial size (at 0 h) in each group (n = 4, * indicates p < 0.05 compared with PBS + TGF-β1).

HC-HA/PTX3 down-regulates Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling

In a post-confluent cell culture-based model, proliferation and EMT in ARPE-19 cells are mainly regulated by Wnt/β-catenin signaling and TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling, respectively33. Herein, we noted that the same signaling was also activated in the low cell density model. As shown in Fig. 2, EGF and FGF-2 induced proliferation of ARPE-19 cells, while TGF-β1 induced EMT. To further discern the signaling pathway controlling proliferation induced by EGF and FGF-2, we stimulated ARPE-19 cells simultaneously with EGF and FGF-2 and treated with 25 μg/ml HMW HA or 25 μg/ml HC-HA/PTX3 for 48 h, in the aforementioned optimized in vitro model. We found that the mRNA expression of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1), which acts downstream in Wnt signaling and binds to Wnt response elements to provide docking sites for β-catenin45, was significantly up-regulated by EGF and FGF-2. The EGF and FGF-2-induced up-regulation was unaffected by HA, but significantly down-regulated by HC-HA/PTX3 (Fig. 6), although the mRNA expression of β-catenin itself was not significantly changed (data not shown). Furthermore, the immunostaining data showed that EGF and FGF-2 induced the nuclear localization of β-catenin and LEF1 (Fig. 7), signifying the activation of canonical Wnt signaling. However, HC-HA/PTX3, but not HA, significantly suppressed the nuclear localization of β-catenin and LEF1 (Fig. 7). As expected, the immunostaining data also showed a significant increase in BrdU labeling by EGF and FGF-2, which was significantly reduced by HC-HA/PTX3 but not HA, in ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 7). These data support that the inhibition of EGF and FGF-2-induced proliferation of ARPE-19 cells by HC-HA/PTX3 was mediated by down-regulation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Figure 6. Suppression of mRNA expression of key markers in Wnt/β-catenin and Smad2/3 signaling by HC-HA/PTX3.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

ARPE-19 cells seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 were simultaneously treated with EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) or TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) together with PBS, HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) for 4 h. The mRNA expression was measured by the real-time PCR assay. n = 4, *indicates p < 0.05 vs. PBS + EGF + FGF-2 or PBS + TGF-β1.

Figure 7. Suppression of nuclear localization of β-catenin and LEF1 by HC-HA/PTX3.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

ARPE-19 cells seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 were simultaneously treated with EGF (10 ng/ml) and FGF-2 (20 ng/ml) together with PBS, HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) for 24 h (for β-catenin and LEF1) or 48 h (for BrdU). The expression and nuclear localization of β-catenin, LEF1, and BrdU was detected by immunostaining. Nuclei were counterstained by Hoechst 33342. The scale bar = 50 μm, n = 4, *indicates p < 0.05 vs. PBS + EGF + FGF-2.

To examine the signaling pathway controlling the EMT induced by TGF-β1, ARPE-19 cells were simultaneously stimulated with TGF-β1 and treated with 25 μg/ml HMW HA or 25 μg/ml HC-HA/PTX3, for 2 h (for pSmad2/3) or 48 h (for α-SMA). We found that the mRNA expression of ZEB1 but not ZEB2 (both transcriptional factors acting downstream in the TGF-β1/Smad2/3 signaling)46 was significantly up-regulated by TGF-β1, which was significantly down-regulated by HA and HC-HA/PTX3 (Fig. 6). Similarly, the mRNA expression of collagen type I α1 and α-SMA was up-regulated by TGF-β1 but down-regulated by HC-HA/PTX3. Downregulation of E-cadherin, one of the hallmarks of EMT47, was observed by TGF-β1 stimulation and further enhanced by HA, but dramatically reversed by HC-HA/PTX3 (Fig. 6). In addition, the immunostaining data showed that TGF-β1 induced the strong nuclear localization of pSmad2/3, while HC-HA/PTX3, but not HA, significantly suppressed the nuclear localization of pSmad2/3 (Fig. 8). As expected, the expression of α-SMA was also down-regulated by HC-HA/PTX3, but not by HA (Fig. 8). These results suggested that suppression of EMT by HC-HA/PTX3 was through suppression of nuclear translocation of pSmad2/3.

Figure 8. Suppression of nuclear localization of pSmad2/3 and α-SMA expression by HC-HA/PTX3.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

ARPE-19 cells seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 were simultaneously treated with TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) together with PBS, HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) for 2 h (for pSmad2/3) and 48 h (for α-SMA). The nuclear localization of pSmad2/3 and expression of α-SMA was detected by immunostaining. Nuclei were counterstained by Hoechst 33342. The scale bar = 50 μm, n = 4, *indicates p < 0.05 vs. PBS + TGF-β1.

Discussion

The development of PVR is critically dependent on growth factors and cytokines present in the pathological milieu, which collectively prolong survival48, proliferation18,33, and EMT49,50,51,52 of dispersed RPE cells in the vitreous cavity. Among them, TGF-β is critical in promoting EMT, migration of RPE cells, and PVR membrane contraction50,53,54. Consistent with our previous report using a post-confluent (high density) cell culture-based model33, we herein demonstrated that both proliferation and EMT, i.e., the two pathogenic hallmarks of PVR, of ARPE-19 cells, can be promoted by EGF + FGF-2 and TGF-β1 via Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β/Smad2/3 signaling, respectively, in an optimized low density cell culture model in an FBS-containing medium (Figs 1 and 2). In this model, we noted that proliferation induced by EGF + FGF-2 was higher than that by “CFs”, a finding that might be explained by the fact that the “CFs” includes IFN-γ which had been reported to inhibit proliferation in human fetal RPE cells stimulated by PDGF-BB, -CC, and –DD, as well as to induce apoptosis55. We also noted that EGF + FGF-2 dramatically suppressed the expression of α-SMA induced by TGF-β1 in the FBS-containing medium (Fig. 2B). This result differed from what we have reported using post-confluent high density cultures33, suggesting that such expression of α-SMA is greatly influenced by the cell density56. We think that the optimized cell model is better at mimicking the in vivo development of PVR where RPE cells are dispersed in the vitreous cavity at low densities initially and driven to proliferate by EGF and FGF-2. Subsequently, at a higher density, the RPE cells are driven to EMT. Using this optimized model, we noted that HC-HA/PTX3, but not HA, inhibits both proliferation and EMT of RPE cells, as well as suppresses cell migration and collagen gel contraction (Figs 5, 6, 7 and 8). Importantly, HC-HA/PTX3 did not affect the viability of RPE cells in the absence of EGF + FGF-2 (Fig. 4C and D). This finding is consistent with our previous reports that HC-HA/PTX3 specifically suppresses activated but not resting neutrophils27,29,57, macrophages29, and lymphocytes27. The cytotoxicity of HC-HA/PTX3 demonstrated by the MTT assay (Fig. 4A and B) but not the WST-1 assay was likely due to enhanced exocytosis of insoluble MTT formazan from cells by HC-HA/PTX3, leading to cell damage37,39. The same phenomenon of cytotoxicity that we observed herein has also been reported for amyloid β peptide39,58 and mesoporous silica nanoparticles59 when both MTT and WST-1 assays were compared. Further pursuit of this putative property of HC-HA/PTX3 may help us disclose additional mechanistic insight into the actions mediated by HC-HA/PTX3.

Inasmuch as we have gained significant understanding of the pathogenesis of PVR during the past decades, the surgical management of this disease is still unsatisfactory. While anti-inflammatory agents, such as corticosteroids, ameliorate PVR in animal models60,61, they have not been efficacious in human trials62. Other anti-proliferative agents (5-fluorouracil63, daunorubicin9, 5-fluorouracil with low molecular weight heparin6,8,64, and DNA-RNA chimeric ribozyme65), growth factor pathway inhibitors (hypericin, an inhibitor of protein kinase C66 and tranilast, an inhibitor of TGF-β167) and antioxidant agents (N-acetylcysteine68) have failed to either decrease re-detachment rates or improve visual outcomes. These unsuccessful outcomes suggest that the pathogenesis of PVR is multifactorial and complex. Indeed, immunohistochemical studies have revealed that at least RPE cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages are present in PVR membranes11,69,70. Other cells found in PVR membranes include Müller/glial cells, fibroblasts/myofibroblasts, and a myriad of immune cells (macrophages, monocytes, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, and cells expressing HLA-DR and DQ)71. Injection of each individual type of these cells also induces PVR in animal models72,73,74. It is no wonder therapeutic options that target only one factor or a single cellular process have not been effective62,75.

Consequently, HC-HA/PTX3 purified from AM is a potential novel biologic that can help address such an unmet clinical need by circumventing the aforementioned shortcomings. As demonstrated herein, HC-HA/PTX3 uniquely suppresses proliferation, EMT, migration, and gel contraction mediated by RPE cells. As reviewed by Tseng76, HC-HA/PTX3’s anti-inflammatory action applies to activated but not resting neutrophils27,29,57, macrophages29, and lymphocytes27, i.e., extending from innate to adaptive immune responses. In addition, its anti-scarring action applies to human corneal fibroblasts to downregulate TGF-β1 promoter activity30 and its anti-angiogenic action applies to human umbilical vascular endothelial cells to inhibit cell viability, proliferation, migration, and tube formation26. In animals, we have reported that subconjunctival injection of HC-HA/PTX3 down-regulates activation of CD4+ Th1 cells to prolong the survival of murine corneal allografts30 and reduces infiltration of bone marrow-derived fibrocytes and immune cells to the lacrimal glands and conjunctiva to avert dry eye in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) (Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 42195 (2017) doi:10.1038/srep42195). Now that we have gathered strong in vitro data supporting the safety and efficacy of HC-HA/PTX3 in suppressing multiple pathological processes of RPE cells, we are well poised to test it in our established rabbit PVR model (Kuriyan et al., ARVO 2015, poster number: 2287).

Materials and Methods

Materials

Human ARPE-19 cell line and primary RPE cells were from ATCC (Manassas, VA) and Lonza (Walkersville, MD), respectively. Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Ham’s/F12 medium, HEPES buffer, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), penicillin-streptomycin, fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.05% trypsin/EDTA, recombinant human CTGF, and Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary IgG were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Recombinant human EGF, FGF-2, HGF, IGF-1, IL-6, PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, PDGF-CC, PTX3, and VEGF were from R & D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant human G-CSF, IFN-γ, MCP-1, TGF-α, TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 were from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Hyaluronidase, protease inhibitors, bovine serum albumin (BSA), paraformaldehyde, methanol, Triton X-100, and Hoechst 33342 dye were from Sigma (St Louis, MO). α-SMA and BrdU antibodies were from Abcam (La Jolla, CA); β-catenin antibody was from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); Antibodies to lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) and phospho-Smad2/3 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). HMW HA, Healon® (~4,000 kDa, medical grade), was from Advanced Medical Optics (Santa Ana, CA). BCA Protein Assay Kit was from Pierce (Rockford, IL). HA quantitation kit was from Corgenix (Broomfield, CO). Plastic culture dishes were from Becton Dickinson (Lincoln Park, NJ).

Methods

Purification of HC-HA/PTX3 from Human AM

As reported27, HC-HA/PTX3 was prepared from cryopreserved human placentas77 provided by Bio-Tissue, Inc. (Miami, FL). AM from the same donor was extracted by PBS (pH 7.4) to generate PBS extract as reported27. The extract was then fractionated by ultracentrifugation in a CsCl gradient at an initial density of 1.35 g/ml in 4 M GnHCl at 35,000 rpm for 48 h at 15 °C (Optima™ L-80 X, SW41 rotor, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN). A total of 12 fractions (1 ml/fraction) was collected from each ultracentrifuge tube. The weight of each fraction was measured to calculate the density. After the biochemical analysis (HA ELISA and BCA protein assay, see below), fractions containing HA but little or no proteins were pooled and subjected to the second run of ultracentrifugation in a CsCl gradient at an initial density of 1.40 g/ml27. Selective fractions (containing HA but undetectable proteins) designated as HC-HA/PTX3 were pooled and dialyzed against distilled water, lyophilized, and stored at −80 °C. Therefore, the amount of HC-HA/PTX3 was expressed based on the HA amount present in the complex.

Biochemical Characterization of HC-HA/PTX3

As reported27,29, the content of HA and proteins were measured by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent HA Quantitative Test Kit (Corgenix, Broomfield CO) and the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), respectively. These two methods have been validated by our R & D Department. Western blotting was used to detect the presence of HC1 (ab70048, abcam, Cambridge, MA) and PTX3 (ALX-804-464-C100, Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) in purified HC-HA/PTX3 with or without HAase digestion (1 U/μg HA with supplement with protease inhibitors, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Western Blotting

Samples were electrophoresed on 4–15% (w/v) gradient acrylamide ready gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under denaturing and reducing conditions, and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad), which was then blocked with 5% (w/v) fat-free milk powder in Tris-buffered saline (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4,150 mM NaCl, TBS) with 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature, and washed with TBST three times for 10 min each. Then, specific primary antibodies were incubated with the membrane at 4 °C overnight. After three washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in TBST for 1 h. The membranes were then washed with TBST three times for 10 min each followed by TBS once for 5 min, and immunoreactive proteins were detected with Western Lighting Chemiluminescence Reagent (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) and images captured by GE ImageQuant CAS 4000 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA).

Cell Culture and Treatment

ARPE-19, a human diploid RPE cell line, was cultured in HEPES-buffered DMEM and Ham’s F-12 (1:1) supplemented with 10% FBS, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2. For post-confluence experiments, cells were continuously cultured for 7 days upon 100% confluence before being tested. For low cell density assays, cells were seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 or other densities overnight (20–24 h) followed by treatment with growth factors and cytokines for 24–120 h or 48 h (after optimization). In the case of serum starvation, cells were incubated in serum-free (SF) medium for 24 h followed by treatment with growth factors and cytokines for 24–120 h. BrdU (10 μM) labeling was performed for 4 h prior to the termination of the growth factors/cytokines treatment.

Cell Viability and Proliferation

MTT and WST-1 assays were used to measure the cell viability while BrdU ELISA and WST-1 assays were used to measure the cell proliferation. For the MTT assay, ARPE-19 cells were seeded at 1 × 104/cm2 in 96-well plate in DMEM/F12/10% FBS for 24 h and simultaneously treated with PBS (vehicle control), HA, or HC-HA/PTX3 of different concentrations for 48 h. The substrate MTT (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) was added to each well (e.g., add 10 μl of ready-use MTT substrate to 100 μl of cell culture medium) for 4 h according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Then 100 μl of the lysis buffer (provided in the kit) was added to each well containing MTT. After incubation at 37 °C overnight, the color development was measured by absorbance at 550 nm, with a reference absorbance at 690 nm. Each sample was assayed at least in triplicate. For the WST-1 assay, the cell seeding and treatment were the same as described in MTT assay. The substrate WST-1 (Cayman Chemical Company, Ann Arbor, MI) was added to each well (e.g., add 10 μl of ready-use WST-1 substrate to 100 μl of cell culture medium) for 2 h according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The color development was measured by absorbance at 450 nm. Each sample was assayed at least in triplicate. For the BrdU ELISA assay, the cell seeding and treatment were the same as described in MTT assay. 10 μM BrdU (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) was added during the last 4 h of the culturing period. After the cell culture medium was removed, cells were fixed for 30 min followed by incubation with anti-BrdU antibody for 1–2 h at 25 °C. After wash, the substrate was added and the color development was allowed for 15–30 min before measurement of absorbance at 450 nm, using absorbance at 670 nm as a reference. Each sample was assayed at least in triplicate.

Cell Death Detection ELISA Assay

Cell lysates equivalent to 104 cells after 48-hour treatment with or without HA (0–100 μg/ml) or HC-HA/PTX3 (0–100 μg/ml) were collected separately for assay (Cell Death Detection ELISAPLUS Assay; Roche Applied Science) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This ELISA is a photometric enzyme immunoassay for in vitro qualitative and quantitative determination of cytoplasmic histone-associated DNA fragments (mononucleosomes and oligonucleosomes) generated by apoptotic cell death using mouse monoclonal anti-histone and anti- DNA antibodies. The positive control was included as provided by the manufacturer, and absorbance was measured at 405 nm.

Cell Migration

The migration assay was performed in 24-well transwell plate (8 μm pore size, Costar, Kennebunk, ME) by adding 0.5 ml DMEM/F12 (1:1) with or without EGF (10 ng/ml), FGF-2 (20 ng/ml), and TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) in the lower compartment while adding 0.1 ml of ARPE-19 cells in DMEM/F12 (2 × 106/ml) treated with PBS (vehicle control), HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) to the upper compartment. After incubation at 37 °C for 8 h, cells not migrating through the pores were removed by a cotton swab, while cells on the filter facing the lower compartment were fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde, stained with 1% crystal violet, and counted from six random microscopic fields for each control or treatment group.

Collagen Gel Contraction

0.25 ml of collagen type I solution (Corning, Bedford, MA) in cold DMEM/F12 (2.5 mg/ml) was added to each well of 24-well plates, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 1 h before adding 0.5 ml of ARPE-19 cells or primary human RPE cells (each at 5 × 105/ml) with or without TGF-β1 (10 ng/ml) and PBS (vehicle control), HA (25 μg/ml), or HC-HA/PTX3 (25 μg/ml) on the top of collagen gel. After 24 h, the gels were freed from the walls of the culture wells with a small spatula. The photographic images of collagen gels were digitalized and the area was measured with NIH ImageJ 1.45 software. The percentage of gel contraction was determined by measuring the gel size at 72 h and comparing to the initial size (at 0 h).

Extraction of Total RNA and Real-time PCR

Total RNAs were extracted using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and reverse-transcribed using High Capacity Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). cDNA of each sample was amplified by quantitative real-time PCR using specific primer-probe mixtures (Col I α1: Hs00164004_m1; E-Cadherin: Hs01023894_m1; GAPDH: Hs02758991_g1; LEF1: Hs01547250_m1; ZEB1: Hs00232783_m1; ZEB2: Hs00207691_m1; α-SMA: Hs00426835_g1) and DNA polymerase in 7300 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The program for real-time PCR profile consisted of 10 min of initial activation at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec denaturation at 95 °C, and 1 min of annealing and extension at 60 °C. The relative gene expression data were analyzed by the comparative CT method (ΔΔCT). All assays were performed in triplicates; the results were normalized by glceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) as an internal control.

Immunofluorescence Confocal Microscopy

Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS (pH 7.0) for 15 min at room temperature. Then, cells were rehydrated in PBS, permeabilized in cold (−20 °C) acetone for 10 min at −20 °C. After being rinsed three times with PBS for 5 min each, cells were incubated with 5% BSA/0.03% Triton X-100/PBS for 30 min at room temperature to block non-specific binding. Appropriate primary antibodies were then added in 1% BSA/0.03% Triton X-100/PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with PBS, cells were incubated with corresponding Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary IgG for 60 min at room temperature. For BrdU staining, cells were fixed with 75% methanol plus 25% acetic acid for 15 min, denatured by 2 M HCl for 30 min at 37 °C and neutralized by washing in 0.1 M borate buffer, pH 8.5, three times for 5 min each. Monoclonal anti-BrdU and Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary IgGs were used as described above. The sample incubated with an appropriate secondary antibody but not the primary antibody was used as a negative control. The samples were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 and analyzed with Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope (Thornhood, NY). Nuclear positive cells of β-catenin, LEF1, BrdU, or pSmad2/3 cytoplasm-positive α-SMA cells, and total cells, were counted from 4 random microscopic fields. The average percent (%) of the number of positive cells divided by the number of total cells in each field served as an index for comparison.

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative results were expressed as mean ± S.D. from at least three independent experiments. Statistical significance for quantitative results was assessed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. In some cases, the two-tailed Student’s t test was used to assess significance. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Linear regression for comparison of WST-1 assay and BrdU ELISA data was generated in Excel 2013 (Microsoft Corp., Seattle, WA).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: He, H. et al. Inhibition of Proliferation and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells by Heavy Chain-Hyaluronan/Pentraxin 3. Sci. Rep. 7, 43736; doi: 10.1038/srep43736 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants of R43 EY025447 (HH), R43 EY021045 (ST), R44 EY017497 (ST) and RO1 EY06819 (ST) from National Eye Institute, National Institute of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA; an award from Bayer Global Ophthalmology Awards Program Grant (AEK), Heed Ophthalmic Foundation (AEK); NIH Center Core Grant P30EY014801, Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted Grant, and the Department of Defense (DOD Grant #W81XWH-09-1-0675) to Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, and the additional financial support from Tissue Tech, Inc., Miami, FL.

Footnotes

S.C.G.T. is an investor of TissueTech, Inc. H.H., C.-W.S., M.M., and Y-T.Z. are employee of TissueTech, Inc. A.E.K., Y.Z., H.W.F., and J.-M.P. declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions H.H. and A.E.K. designed and carried out experiments, analysed data, and wrote the paper; C.-W.S., M.M., Y.Z. and Y.-T.Z. carried out experiments; H.W.F. and J-M.P. revised the paper; S.C.G.T. revised the experiment design, analysed the data, and wrote the paper. All authors had approved the submitted manuscript.

References

  1. Cardillo J. A. et al. Post-traumatic proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The epidemiologic profile, onset, risk factors, and visual outcome. Ophthalmology 104, 1166–1173 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tseng W., Cortez R. T., Ramirez G., Stinnett S. & Jaffe G. J. Prevalence and risk factors for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment but no previous vitreoretinal surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 137, 1105–1115 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abrams G. W. et al. Vitrectomy with silicone oil or long-acting gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of additional and long-term follow-up. Silicone Study report 11. Arch. Ophthalmol. 115, 335–344 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ahmadieh H. et al. Triamcinolone acetonide in silicone-filled eyes as adjunctive treatment for proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 115, 1938–1943 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Williams R. G., Chang S., Comaratta M. R. & Simoni G. Does the presence of heparin and dexamethasone in the vitrectomy infusate reduce reproliferation in proliferative vitreoretinopathy? Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 234, 496–503 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asaria R. H. et al. Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and heparin prevents proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results from a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology 108, 1179–1183 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Charteris D. G. et al. A randomized controlled trial of combined 5-fluorouracil and low-molecular-weight heparin in management of established proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmology 111, 2240–2245 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wickham L., Bunce C., Wong D., McGurn D. & Charteris D. G. Randomized controlled trial of combined 5-Fluorouracil and low-molecular-weight heparin in the management of unselected rhegmatogenous retinal detachments undergoing primary vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 114, 698–704 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wiedemann P., Hilgers R. D., Bauer P. & Heimann K. Adjunctive daunorubicin in the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: results of a multicenter clinical trial. Daunomycin Study Group. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 126, 550–559 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hiscott P., Sheridan C., Magee R. M. & Grierson I. Matrix and the retinal pigment epithelium in proliferative retinal disease. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 18, 167–190 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Pennock S., Haddock L. J., Eliott D., Mukai S. & Kazlauskas A. Is neutralizing vitreal growth factors a viable strategy to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy? Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 40, 16–34 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lei H., Rheaume M. A. & Kazlauskas A. Recent developments in our understanding of how platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and its receptors contribute to proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Exp. Eye Res. 90, 376–381 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Anderson D. H., Stern W. H., Fisher S. K., Erickson P. A. & Borgula G. A. The onset of pigment epithelial proliferation after retinal detachment. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 21, 10–16 (1981). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kiilgaard J. F. et al. Subretinal posterior pole injury induces selective proliferation of RPE cells in the periphery in in vivo studies in pigs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 48, 355–360 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bullions L. C., Notterman D. A., Chung L. S. & Levine A. J. Expression of wild-type alpha-catenin protein in cells with a mutant alpha-catenin gene restores both growth regulation and tumor suppressor activities. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 4501–4508 (1997). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Banerjee A., Moore C. C., Tse R. & Matic D. Rounding of the inferior rectus muscle as an indication of orbital floor fracture with periorbital disruption. J. Otolaryngol. 36, 175–180 (2007). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ricker L. J. et al. Interleukin and growth factor levels in subretinal fluid in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a case-control study. PLoS One 6, e19141, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019141 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pennock S., Rheaume M. A., Mukai S. & Kazlauskas A. A novel strategy to develop therapeutic approaches to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 179, 2931–2940 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pennock S. & Kazlauskas A. Vascular endothelial growth factor A competitively inhibits platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)-dependent activation of PDGF receptor and subsequent signaling events and cellular responses. Mol Cell Biol 32, 1955–1966, doi: 10.1128/MCB.06668-11 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tseng S. C. et al. How does amniotic membrane work? Ocul. Surf. 2, 177–187 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dua H. S., Gomes J. A., King A. J. & Maharajan V. S. The amniotic membrane in ophthalmology. Surv. Ophthalmol. 49, 51–77 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tseng S. C., Li D. Q. & Ma X. Suppression of transforming growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane matrix. J Cell Physiol 179, 325–335 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee S. B., Li D. Q., Tan D. T., Meller D. C. & Tseng S. C. Suppression of TGF-beta signaling in both normal conjunctival fibroblasts and pterygial body fibroblasts by amniotic membrane. Curr Eye Res 20, 325–334 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li W., He H., Chen Y. T., Hayashida Y. & Tseng S. C. Reversal of myofibroblasts by amniotic membrane stromal extract. J Cell Physiol 215, 657–664 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Choi T. H. & Tseng S. C. G. In vivo and in vitro demonstration of epithelial cell-induced myofibroblast differentiation of keratocytes and an inhibitory effect by amniotic membrane. Cornea 20, 197–204 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shay E., He H., Sakurai S. & Tseng S. C. Inhibition of angiogenesis by HC.HA, a complex of hyaluronan and the heavy chain of inter-alpha-inhibitor, purified from human amniotic membrane. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 52, 2669–2678 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. He H. et al. Biochemical characterization and function of complexes formed by hyaluronan and the heavy chains of inter-alpha-inhibitor (HC * HA) purified from extracts of human amniotic membrane. J Biol Chem 284, 20136–20146, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.021881 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Zhang S., He H., Day A. J. & Tseng S. C. Constitutive expression of inter-alpha-inhibitor (IalphaI) family proteins and tumor necrosis factor-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) by human amniotic membrane epithelial and stromal cells supporting formation of the heavy chain-hyaluronan (HC-HA) complex. J Biol Chem. 287, 12433–12444 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. He H., Zhang S., Tighe S., Son J. & Tseng S. C. Immobilized Heavy Chain-Hyaluronic Acid Polarizes Lipopolysaccharide-activated Macrophages toward M2 Phenotype. J Biol Chem. 288, 25792–25803 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. He H., Tan Y., Duffort S., Perez V. L. & Tseng S. C. In vivo downregulation of innate and adaptive immune responses in corneal allograft rejection by HC-HA/PTX3 complex purified from amniotic membrane. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 55, 1647–1656, doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13094 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang S., Zhu Y. T., Chen S. Y., He H. & Tseng S. C. Constitutive expression of pentraxin 3 (PTX3) protein by human amniotic membrane cells leads to formation of the heavy chain (HC)-hyaluronan (HA)-PTX3 complex. J Biol Chem. 289, 13531–13542 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Tseng S. C., He Hua, Zhang Suzhen & Niche Szu-Yu Chen. Regulation of limbal epithelial stem cells relationship between inflammation and regeneration. Ocular Surface (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Chen H. C., Zhu Y. T., Chen S. Y. & Tseng S. C. Wnt signaling induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition with proliferation in ARPE-19 cells upon loss of contact inhibition. Lab Invest 92, 676–687 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jun E. J., Kim H. S. & Kim Y. H. Role of HGF/c-Met in serum-starved ARPE-19 cells. Korean J. Ophthalmol. 21, 244–250 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen Z., Shao Y. & Li X. The roles of signaling pathways in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of PVR. Mol Vis 21, 706–710 (2015). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pennock S., Haddock L. J., Mukai S. & Kazlauskas A. Vascular endothelial growth factor acts primarily via platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha to promote proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Pathol 184, 3052–3068, doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.07.026 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Liu Y., Peterson D. A., Kimura H. & Schubert D. Mechanism of cellular 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) reduction. J. Neurochem. 69, 581–593 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Molinari B. L., Tasat D. R., Palmieri M. A. & Cabrini R. L. Kinetics of MTT-formazan exocytosis in phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells. Micron 36, 177–183, doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2004.08.002 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lu L., Zhang L., Wai M. S., Yew D. T. & Xu J. Exocytosis of MTT formazan could exacerbate cell injury. Toxicol In Vitro 26, 636–644, doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.02.006 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jin M., He S., Worpel V., Ryan S. J. & Hinton D. R. Promotion of adhesion and migration of RPE cells to provisional extracellular matrices by TNF-alpha. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 41, 4324–4332 (2000). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hiscott P. et al. Pathobiology of epiretinal and subretinal membranes: possible roles for the matricellular proteins thrombospondin 1 and osteonectin (SPARC). Eye (Lond) 16, 393–403 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schiro J. A. et al. Integrin a2b1 (VLA-2) mediates reorganization and contraction of collagen matrices by human cells. Cell 67, 403–410 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang C. H. et al. Inhibition of RPE cell-mediated matrix adhesion and collagen gel contraction by crovidisin, a collagen-binding snake venom protein. Curr. Eye Res. 16, 1119–1126 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Leiderman Y. I. & Miller J. W. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: pathobiology and therapeutic targets. Semin. Ophthalmol. 24, 62–69 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Brantjes H., Barker N., van Es J. & Clevers H. TCF: Lady Justice casting the final verdict on the outcome of Wnt signalling. Biol Chem 383, 255–261, doi: 10.1515/BC.2002.027 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vandewalle C., Van Roy F. & Berx G. The role of the ZEB family of transcription factors in development and disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 66, 773–787, doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-8465-8 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Peinado H., Olmeda D. & Cano A. Snail, Zeb and bHLH factors in tumour progression: an alliance against the epithelial phenotype? Nat Rev Cancer 7, 415–428, doi: 10.1038/nrc2131 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lei H., Velez G. & Kazlauskas A. Pathological signaling via platelet-derived growth factor receptor {alpha} involves chronic activation of Akt and suppression of p53. Mol Cell Biol 31, 1788–1799, doi: 10.1128/MCB.01321-10 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Casaroli-Marano R. P., Pagan R. & Vilaro S. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in proliferative vitreoretinopathy: intermediate filament protein expression in retinal pigment epithelial cells. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 40, 2062–2072 (1999). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gamulescu M. A. et al. Transforming growth factor beta2-induced myofibroblastic differentiation of human retinal pigment epithelial cells: regulation by extracellular matrix proteins and hepatocyte growth factor. Exp. Eye Res. 83, 212–222 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tamiya S., Liu L. & Kaplan H. J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells initiated upon loss of cell-cell contact. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 2755–2763 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bastiaans J. et al. Thrombin induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition and collagen production by retinal pigment epithelial cells via autocrine PDGF-receptor signaling. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 54, 8306–8314, doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-12383 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Raymond M. C. & Thompson J. T. RPE-mediated collagen gel contraction. Inhibition by colchicine and stimulation by TGF-beta. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31, 1079–1086 (1990). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Choi K. et al. Pirfenidone inhibits transforming growth factor-beta1-induced fibrogenesis by blocking nuclear translocation of Smads in human retinal pigment epithelial cell line ARPE-19. Mol Vis 18, 1010–1020 (2012). [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Li R., Maminishkis A., Wang F. E. & Miller S. S. PDGF-C and -D induced proliferation/migration of human RPE is abolished by inflammatory cytokines. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 48, 5722–5732 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Burke J. M. Stimulation of DNA synthesis in human and bovine RPE by peptide growth factors: the response to TNF-alpha and EGF is dependent upon culture density. Curr Eye Res 8, 1279–1286 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. He H. et al. Suppression of activation and induction of apoptosis in RAW264.7 cells by amniotic membrane extract. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 49, 4468–4475 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Liu Y. Understanding the biological activity of amyloid proteins in vitro: from inhibited cellular MTT reduction to altered cellular cholesterol homeostatis. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 23, 377–395 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Fisichella M. et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles enhance MTT formazan exocytosis in HeLa cells and astrocytes. Toxicol In Vitro 23, 697–703, doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2009.02.007 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Tano Y., Chandler D. & Machemer R. Treatment of intraocular proliferation with intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 810–816 (1980). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hui Y. N., Liang H. C., Cai Y. S., Kirchhof B. & Heimann K. Corticosteroids and daunomycin in the prevention of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy induced by macrophages. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 231, 109–114 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Koerner F., Merz A., Gloor B. & Wagner E. Postoperative retinal fibrosis–a controlled clinical study of systemic steroid therapy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 219, 268–271 (1982). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Borhani H., Peyman G. A., Rahimy M. H. & Thompson H. Suppression of experimental proliferative vitreoretinopathy by sustained intraocular delivery of 5-FU. Int. Ophthalmol. 19, 43–49 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sundaram V., Barsam A. & Virgili G. Intravitreal low molecular weight heparin and 5-Fluorouracil for the prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy following retinal reattachment surgery. Cochrane. Database. Syst. Rev. CD006421 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Schiff W. M. et al. Safety and efficacy assessment of chimeric ribozyme to proliferating cell nuclear antigen to prevent recurrence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 125, 1161–1167 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Harris M. S. et al. Hypericin inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in retinal pigment epithelial cells: possible involvement of protein kinase C. Curr. Eye Res. 15, 255–262 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Yasukawa T. et al. Effect of tranilast on proliferation, collagen gel contraction, and transforming growth factor beta secretion of retinal pigment epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Ophthalmic Res. 34, 206–212 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lei H. et al. N-acetylcysteine suppresses retinal detachment in an experimental model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Pathol. 177, 132–140 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lin M. L. et al. Macrophages acquire fibroblast characteristics in a rat model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Ophthalmic Res. 45, 180–190 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Weller M., Heimann K. & Wiedemann P. The pathogenesis of vitreoretinal proliferation and traction: a working hypothesis. Med. Hypotheses 31, 157–159 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tang S., Scheiffarth O. F., Wildner G., Thurau S. R. & Lund O. E. Lymphocytes, macrophages and HLA-DR expression in vitreal and epiretinal membranes of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. An immunohistochemical study. Ger J Ophthalmol 1, 176–179 (1992). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Zheng X. Z., Du L. F. & Wang H. P. An immunohistochemical analysis of a rat model of proliferative vitreoretinopathy and a comparison of the expression of TGF-beta and PDGF among the induction methods. Bosn. J. Basic Med. Sci. 10, 204–209 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Chandler D. B., Quansah F. A., Hida T. & Machemer R. A refined experimental model for proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 224, 86–91 (1986). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hui Y. N., Sorgente N. & Ryan S. J. Posterior vitreous separation and retinal detachment induced by macrophages. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 225, 279–284 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pastor J. C., de la Rua E. R. & Martin F. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: risk factors and pathobiology. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 21, 127–144 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tseng S. C. HC-HA/PTX3 Purified From Amniotic Membrane as Novel Regenerative Matrix: Insight Into Relationship Between Inflammation and Regeneration. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 57, ORSFh1–8, doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17637 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Tan E. K. et al. Structural and Biological Comparison of Cryopreserved and Fresh Amniotic Membrane Tissues. Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering 4, 379–388, doi: 10.1166/jbt.2014.1180 (2014). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES