Skip to main content
Journal of Nuclear Medicine logoLink to Journal of Nuclear Medicine
. 2017 Mar;58(3):484–491. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.170910

Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of the Tau PET Radiotracer 18F-T807 (18F-AV-1451) in Human Subjects

Dustin W Wooten 1,2, Nicolas J Guehl 1,2, Eline E Verwer 1,2, Timothy M Shoup 1,2, Daniel L Yokell 1,2, Nevena Zubcevik 3, Neil Vasdev 1,2, Ross D Zafonte 3,4, Keith A Johnson 2, Georges El Fakhri 1,2, Marc D Normandin 1,2,
PMCID: PMC5334185  NIHMSID: NIHMS843390  PMID: 27660144

Abstract

18F-T807 is a PET radiotracer developed for imaging tau protein aggregates, which are implicated in neurologic disorders including Alzheimer disease and traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current study characterizes 18F-T807 pharmacokinetics in human subjects using dynamic PET imaging and metabolite-corrected arterial input functions. Methods: Nine subjects (4 controls, 3 with a history of TBI, 2 with mild cognitive impairment due to suspected Alzheimer disease) underwent dynamic PET imaging for up to 120 min after bolus injection of 18F-T807 with arterial blood sampling. Total volume of distribution (VT) was estimated using compartmental modeling (1- and 2-tissue configurations) and graphical analysis techniques (Logan and multilinear analysis 1 [MA1] regression methods). Reference region–based methods of quantification were explored including Logan distribution volume ratio (DVR) and static SUV ratio (SUVR) using the cerebellum as a reference tissue. Results: The percentage of unmetabolized 18F-T807 in plasma followed a single exponential with a half-life of 17.0 ± 4.2 min. Metabolite-corrected plasma radioactivity concentration fit a biexponential (half-lives, 18.1 ± 5.8 and 2.4 ± 0.5 min). 18F-T807 in gray matter peaked quickly (SUV > 2 at ∼5 min). Compartmental modeling resulted in good fits, and the 2-tissue model with estimated blood volume correction (2Tv) performed best, particularly in regions with elevated binding. VT was greater in mild cognitive impairment subjects than controls in the occipital, parietal, and temporal cortices as well as the posterior cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and mesial temporal cortex. High focal uptake was found in the posterior corpus callosum of a TBI subject. Plots from Logan and MA1 graphical methods became linear by 30 min, yielding regional estimates of VT in excellent agreement with compartmental analysis and providing high-quality parametric maps when applied in voxelwise fashion. Reference region–based approaches including Logan DVR (t* = 55 min) and SUVR (80- to 100-min interval) were highly correlated with DVR estimated using 2Tv (R2 = 0.97, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: 18F-T807 showed rapid clearance from plasma and properties suitable for tau quantification with PET. Furthermore, simplified approaches using DVR (t* = 55 min) and static SUVR (80–100 min) with cerebellar reference tissue were found to correlate highly with compartmental modeling outcomes.

Keywords: tau, PET, 18F-T807, pharmacokinetics, kinetic modeling


The tubulin-associated unit (or tau) is a naturally occurring protein that is integral in providing the white matter microtubule support structure. When impaired, tau proteins can abnormally hyperphosphorylate to form paired helical filaments and eventually insoluble aggregates (1,2). These neuronal changes are believed to cause decline in neuronal communication and eventual cell death. Tau pathology is a key hallmark in Alzheimer disease (3) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) (4,5). Recently, much effort has been placed in the development of PET radiotracers for in vivo quantitation of tau (6). Optimal radiotracer characteristics for quantification of tauopathies include selectivity for tau, low nonspecific uptake, high brain penetration, fast clearance from plasma, minimal brain-penetrating radioactive metabolites, and minimal defluorination for 18F-labeled compounds. Several PET radiotracers are currently in use. 18F-FDDNP showed promise initially, but binding was found to be nonspecific (7). In vivo imaging with 11C-PBB3 (8) resulted in a radioactive metabolite that was found to enter the brain, complicating quantification of tau pathology (9). A series of compounds developed by Okamura et al. are showing potential. Earlier versions, THK5105 and THK5117, had relatively high levels of white matter uptake, however, the most recent compound, THK5351, is reported to exhibit less white matter retention and promising kinetics (10,11). Two other compounds were developed by Siemens, namely 18F-T807 (12,13) (also known as 18F-AV1451) and 18F-T808 (14). 18F-T808 demonstrated high bone uptake suggestive of defluorination (15). 18F-T807 showed favorable PET imaging properties, and imaging studies showed 18F-T807 uptake tracked well with expected tau pathology distribution throughout the stages of Alzheimer disease (12). Because of the difficult synthesis of 18F-T807 using methods initially described, our group developed a concise radiosynthesis appropriate for production on commercially available automated synthesis modules, expanding the access of 18F-T807 (16).

Binding of 18F-T807 in postmortem brain tissue from a range of neurologic conditions has been assessed (17), and research using 18F-T807 for in vivo imaging has been active (18); however, a full characterization of the in vivo pharmacokinetic profile and determination of appropriate quantification methods have yet to be performed. Therefore, the goal of this work was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of 18F-T807 using dynamic PET imaging data and arterial input functions corrected for radiometabolites. In subjects demonstrating a wide range of expected tau pathology including healthy controls, subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and subjects with a history of TBI, we performed compartmental modeling using arterial input functions. With the compartmental modeling estimates of total volume of distribution (VT) as a gold standard, we then compared simplified approaches for estimation of VT and reference region–based methods for quantitation of 18F-T807 uptake.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

As shown in Table 1, 9 subjects, consisting of 4 healthy controls absent neurologic conditions, 2 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 3 subjects with a history of TBI (2 due to automotive accidents and 1 former professional football player with history of concussion), were included in this work. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Massachusetts General Hospital, and all subjects signed an informed consent form.

TABLE 1.

Subject Information

Subject no. Status Age (y) Sex Mass (kg) Body mass index (kg/m2) Years since TBI exposure
1 CNTL 60 M 93 28.5 NA
2 CNTL 29 M 74 22.2 NA
3 CNTL 47 M 136 38.5 NA
4 CNTL 53 M 70 22 NA
5 TBI* 34 M 68 24.9 2
6 TBI* 31 M 100 26.7 8
7 TBI 55 M 105 28.2 20
8 MCI 71 F 54 23.4 NA
9 MCI§ 72 M 83 29.3 NA
*

Automobile accident.

Radiometabolite measurements not performed.

NFL multiple concussions.

Mini-Mental State Examination = 27.

§

Mini-Mental State Examination = 14.

CNTL = control; NA = not applicable.

Imaging Procedures

MRI

MRI procedures were performed for acquisition of a structural T1-weighted magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) (19) using a 3-T Tim Trio (Siemens Medical Systems). The 3-dimensional acquisition used the following parameters: repetition time/echo time/inversion time, 2,100/2.89/1,100 ms; flip angle, 12°; slice thickness, 1 mm; matrix size, 256 × 224.

PET

18F-T807 was synthesized as previously described (16). Imaging was performed using an ECAT EXACT HR+ (CTI/Siemens) in 3-dimensional acquisition mode. Emission data collection was initiated with the bolus injection of 121–196 MBq of 18F-T807. Time bins were 6 × 10, 8 × 15, 6 × 30, 8 × 60, 8 × 120, and 6 × 300 s for the first 60 min, at which time subjects were allowed a brief break before being repositioned on the scanner for collection of emission data from 75 up to 120 min in 9 × 300 s frames. Six-minute transmission scans were acquired just before administration of 18F-T807 and immediately after the end of emission data acquisition for attenuation correction of PET images in the first and second scan blocks, respectively. 18F-T807 was administered via the antecubital vein over a 1-min infusion using a Medfusion syringe pump whereas arterial samples were drawn from the radial artery of the opposite arm. Arterial samples of 1–3 mL were acquired every 15 s immediately after radiotracer injection and decreased in frequency to every 15 min toward the end of the scanning duration. 18F-T807 metabolism was measured from 3-mL blood samples acquired at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min.

Data Processing and Analysis

Image Processing

Dynamic PET sinograms were reconstructed using filtered backprojection, and corrections for scatter, attenuation, deadtime, random coincident events, and scanner normalization were applied. Final reconstructed images had voxel dimensions of 128 × 128 × 63 and voxel sizes of 2.06 × 2.06 × 2.42 mm. Motion correction was effected through frame-by-frame rigid body registration using a least-squares algorithm with Levenberg–Marquardt optimization as described by Alpert et al. (20).

Dynamic PET images from session 2 were summed and rigidly coregistered to summed images from the prebreak imaging session (part 1). To derive the transformation matrix, the dynamic PET images (summed from 1 to 10 min after 18F-T807 injection) were rigidly coregistered to the structural MPRAGE image and the MPRAGE itself was transformed into standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space (21) using affine registration followed by nonlinear warping (FMRIB's Linear Image Registration Tool [FLIRT] and FMRIB's Non-Linear Image Registration Tool [FNIRT] in FMRIB Software Library [FSL] (22)). The combined transformation matrix was then applied inversely on MNI and Harvard-Oxford atlases (FSL) to warp the atlas-based regions of interest into native PET space for extraction of radioactivity time–activity curves. Regions of interest surveyed in this work are described in Supplemental Table 1 (supplemental materials are available at http://jnm.snmjournals.org) and shown in Supplemental Figure 1. To facilitate direct visual comparison between subjects, the PET images shown in the figures were transformed into MNI space using the derived combined transformation matrix.

Arterial Input Function

Whole-blood and plasma time–activity curves were obtained by linear interpolation of radioactivity concentrations (kBq/cm3) measured from the arterial blood samples. Radiometabolite analysis was performed using our automated column-switching radio–high-performance liquid chromatography (radio-HPLC) system (23,24). In short, arterial plasma was injected onto the column-switching radio-HPLC and initially trapped on a catch column (Oasis HLB, 30 μm; Waters) using a mobile phase consisting of 99/1 H2O/MeCN at 1 mL/min (515 pump; Waters). After 4 min, the catch column was backflushed with 75/25 0.1 M ammonium formate/MeCN at 1 mL/min (second Waters 515 pump) and directed onto an XBridge BEH C18 (Waters; 130 Å, 3.5 μm, 4.6 × 100 mm) analytic column. Eluent was collected in 1-min intervals and subsequently assayed for radioactivity using a Wizard 1470 γ-counter (Wallac). After background radioactivity subtraction, radioactivity eluting in the 18F-T807 peak was divided by the total activity and multiplied by 100% for calculation of percentage parent in plasma (%PP).

SUV time courses of radioactivity in whole blood were generated for intersubject comparison by correcting absolute radioactivity concentrations (C [kBq/mL]) for subject body weight (BW [kg]) and injected dose (ID [MBq]): SUV = C/(ID/BW). All subjects underwent arterial sampling for measurement of radioactivity concentration, but because of technical problems, metabolite analysis was not performed in 2 subjects (subjects 7 and 8). Because metabolite analysis was not performed in 2 subjects, %PP time course for all subjects was fit to a single exponential decay to generate a groupwise %PP(t). Individual subject arterial input functions of 18F-T807 radioactivity concentration in plasma were generated by correcting individual plasma radioactivity concentration for 18F-T807 metabolism using the groupwise %PP(t) CP(t)=CPtotal(t)×%PP(t)/100%. Finally, 18F-T807 arterial SUV time courses were generated for intersubject comparisons.

Compartmental Modeling with Plasma Input Functions

Compartmental modeling was performed, using in-house–developed software (MATLAB), for estimation of VT and other kinetic parameters using CP(t) as the input function. Analyses were implemented on a regional basis using the conventional 1- and 2-tissue-compartment models with a fixed vascular fraction (fV=0.07) (1T, 2T) or a variable fV (1Tv, 2Tv) considered an additional parameter (25). For completeness, 2-tissue-compartment models with irreversible binding (2T-irrev, 2Tv-irrev)—that is, with the binding dissociation rate constant k4 set to zero—were also examined.

For models with reversible binding, the outcome of primary interest was the macroparameter VT, reflecting the equilibrium ratio of radiotracer concentration in the tissue versus plasma (25). For 1-tissue models, the VT is expressed in terms of estimated kinetic parameters by VT = K1/k2; for 2-tissue models, the relationship is given by VT = (K1/k2)(1 + k3/k4).

Graphical Analysis with Plasma Input Functions

Graphical methods with plasma input functions are alternative techniques for estimation of VT in which linear regression is applied to an integral transformation of the measured dynamic data. We investigated Logan graphical method (26) and multilinear analysis 1 (MA1) (27) in this work. The optimal choice for the cutoff time t* was assessed empirically by repeating analyses for a range of t* values (20–110 min in 5-min increments) and then assessing the time stability of VT estimates as well as visually examining the quality of the resulting line fits to determine the earliest cutoff time that was applicable for all subjects and regions measured.

Reference Region–Based Analyses

Reference region–based analyses of 18F-T807 uptake were performed using the cerebellum (excluding the vermis) as a reference tissue. Distribution volume ratio (DVR) (equivalent to VT/nondisplaceable distribution volume, assuming a valid reference tissue) was estimated using the Logan graphical method with a reference region input function (28). The optimal t* was determined as for the plasma Logan method by systematically varying the cutoff time and assessing linearity of the transformed data and stability of resulting DVR estimates.

The most simplified analysis method surveyed in this work was the SUVR, which is radioactivity concentration in a tissue region divided by the radioactivity concentration in the reference tissue. The cerebellum was again used as the reference tissue, and SUVR was calculated from PET data acquired 80–100 min after injection (SUVR80–100).

Estimates of Logan DVR and SUVR were compared with equivalents of DVR from compartmental modeling with arterial inputs, namely VTtissue/VTref.

Parametric Mapping

Dynamic PET images were smoothed by application of a 3-mm (full width at half maximum) gaussian filter. Logan analysis with plasma input was then applied in a voxel-by-voxel fashion to produce parametric maps of VTtissue/VTref to allow a comparison with voxelwise parametric images generated using the Logan method with reference tissue input and static SUVR80–100.

Statistical Analysis

The goodness of fit for alternative compartmental models was compared within each dataset using the Akaike information criterion, AIC=nln(RSS/n)+2k, where n is the number of time frames, RSS is the residual sum of squares, and k is the number of model parameters (29). We used AIC weights to assign to each evaluated model the probability that, out of the set of models considered, that particular model is the correct one, given the data. Weights were calculated as AICweight,i=e12Δi/ke12Δk, where i indicates the individual model and k indicates the total number of models considered (6, in our case) and Δi=AICiAICmin with AICmin defined as the minimum AIC value for the time–activity curve being evaluated (30). To enable group comparison of model preference, median AIC weights are reported in this paper. Statistical processing was performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software). Quantification methods of 18F-T807 were compared using the coefficient of determination and t distribution of the Fisher transformation to generate P values for linear regressions. All data are reported as mean ± SD unless otherwise noted.

RESULTS

Imaging Procedures

PET and MR imaging procedures were performed in 9 subjects from 3 status groups. Subject information is shown in Table 1. The mean and SD of the administered mass of 18F-T807 was 1.0 ± 0.5 μg (range, 0.4–2.0 μg). The mean administered activity was 176 ± 23 MBq (range, 121–196 MBq).

Radioactivity in Arterial Blood

Whole-blood–to–plasma radioactivity concentration rapidly reached equilibrium, averaging 0.98 ± 0.04 by 1 min after injection as shown in Figure 1A. The whole-blood radioactivity time course showed consistency across subjects as shown in Figure 1B. A slight increase in whole-blood SUV was observed at about 30 min after injection.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

Arterial blood measurements. (A) Plot of whole-blood–to–plasma radioactivity concentration ratio. (B) Whole-blood SUV time course. (C) Reversed-phase radio–high-performance liquid chromatogram from 15-min plasma sample in subject 6 with polar, moderately nonpolar, and 18F-T807 components delineated. (D) Time course of polar, slightly nonpolar, and 18F-T807 components as depicted in C. (E) %PP of 18F-T807. (F) 18F-T807 SUV time course in plasma. A, B, E, and F show mean and SD across all subjects, whereas C and D show data from representative subject. PL = plasma; WB = whole blood.

An example radio-HPLC fraction chromatogram for the 15-min sample from a representative subject (subject 6) is shown in Figure 1C. As confirmed by direct injection of an aliquot of the radiotracer onto the system, 18F-T807 began eluting from the column-switching radio-HPLC at 12 min. Figure 1D shows concentration over time of the 3 radioactivity fractions. %PP of 18F-T807 over time was well described by a single exponential fit, with a half-life of 17.0 ± 4.2 min. Mean and SD of %PP time course is shown in Figure 1E.

The 18F-T807 radioactivity concentration time course in plasma is shown in Figure 1F. At 5 min after injection, the average metabolite-corrected plasma data were described well by a biexponential function (half-lives, 2.4 ± 0.5 and 18.1 ± 5.8 min). After 10 min, the coefficient of variation in 18F-T807 SUV in plasma across subjects was 17% ± 3.5%. No differences in metabolite-corrected plasma SUV were discernible between subject groups (control, TBI, MCI).

Region-of-Interest Analysis

SUVpeak in gray matter averaged 2.4 ± 0.27 and was greater than 2 for all subjects. In white matter, SUVpeak averaged 1.92 ± 0.17 for all subjects. Shown in Figure 2 are regional time–activity curves from different brain regions for a representative control and 2 subjects demonstrating tau pathology. For the control subject, time–activity curves exhibited relatively homogeneous kinetics and converged to similar values by about 40 min. For the 2 subjects demonstrating tau pathology, time–activity curves showed regionally enhanced uptake and greater interregion heterogeneity in kinetics.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

(A–C) Time–activity curves and 2Tv (solid lines) fits for a control subject (subject 3), a subject with history of TBI (subject 5), and an MCI subject (subject 9). (D) SUV PET measured time course in cerebellum for all subjects. TAC = time–activity curves.

Figure 2D shows cerebellar time–activity curves for all subjects. The cerebellum exhibited fast wash-in of radioactivity with high initial SUVpeak (≥2) and rapid clearance (SUV < 1 by 60 min). SUVs reached reasonable convergence by about 60 min. As observed in Figure 2D, subjects with a history of TBI exhibited somewhat reduced SUVpeak compared with control and MCI subjects.

Fits to regional time–activity curves for the 2Tv models are shown in Figures 2A–2C (fits for 1Tv models are shown in Supplemental Fig. 2). In MCI subjects, high preference for the 2Tv reversible model was observed (AICweight,median = 1). In control subjects, preference for the 2Tv reversible model was maintained with an AICweight,median = 0.73. Interestingly, for the TBI subjects, model preference seemed to shift toward the 2Tv irreversible model, with an AICweight,median = 0.05 for the reversible and AICweight,median = 0.48 for the irreversible model. The 2Tv reversible model was selected as the compartmental method of choice because it provided good fits in all datasets (notably including those showing high uptake), was statistically preferred in most datasets, and provided an outcome consistent with our understanding of the tracer’s binding properties. Compartmental results reported throughout the remainder of this paper are derived using this model unless otherwise noted. Omission of the vascular contribution (fV) as a parameter greatly reduced AIC weights (AICweight,median = 0). Regional VT estimates from the 2Tv model are shown in Figure 3A and Supplemental Table 2. The cerebellum showed the lowest variability in VT (4.1 ± 0.5; coefficient of variation = 11.8%) despite larger variation in SUV (Fig. 2D and text earlier in this section). No significant differences in cerebellar VT, K1, or k2 were found between the subject groups. Cerebellar K1 was stable at 0.26 ± 0.06 mL·min−1·cm−3), with higher variability found in k2 (0.17 ± 0.13 min−1).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

Results from arterial input function–based analyses. (A) Regional VT estimates from 2Tv compartmental model in cerebellum (CB), frontal cortex (FC), occipital cortex (OC), parietal cortex (PC), temporal cortex (TC), posterior cingulate gyrus (PCg), precuneus (PCUN), subject-specific region of interest (ROI) in corpus callosum (CC), and mesial temporal cortex (MTC). (B) Demonstration of Logan plot linearization in MCI subject (subject 9) for estimation of VT. Large circles depict 30-min t* point. Axes were truncated to enhance visualization of higher binding regions. (C and D) Comparison of 2Tv and graphical estimates of VT using either Logan analysis (C) or MA1 (D). In A, C, and D, red markers designate control subjects, green markers correspond to TBI subjects, and blue markers indicate MCI subjects.

Logan (26) and MA1 (27) graphical methods resulted in estimates of VT highly correlated with those from 2Tv. The Logan plot for 1 subject with a range of uptake is shown in Figure 3B, demonstrating a reasonable level of linearization by t* of 30 min. As shown in Figures 3C and 3D, high correlation was found between both graphical methods and the estimates of VT from compartmental analysis (Logan: R2 = 0.97, P < 0.0001; MA1: R2 = 0.97, P < 0.0001). Additionally, as shown in Supplemental Figure 3, estimates of Logan VT correlated well with MA1 VT (Logan: R2 = 0.99, P < 0.0001).

Reference region–based analysis was performed using the cerebellum because of the high consistency observed in VT across the subjects. Logan analyses performed with t* systematically varied between 20 and 110 min demonstrated stabilization in DVR over all regions by approximately 55 min. A representative Logan plot is shown in Figure 4A demonstrating that linearization is reached by the 55-min cutoff (indicated by the large circles) even in the higher binding regions. A comparison of 2Tv VT/VTref and Logan DVR is shown in Figure 4B, indicating high correlation (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.0001), though with some negative bias at high values. A comparison of 2Tv VT/VTref and SUVR80–100 shows similarly high correlation (R2 = 0.96, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4C), however, no bias is evident across the range of observed values. In white matter, SUVR80–100 averaged 1.15 ± 0.1 over all control subjects.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

Results from reference region–based analyses with cerebellar input functions. (A) Demonstration of Logan plot linearization in MCI subject (subject 9) for estimation of DVR. Large circles depict 55-min t* point. Axes were scaled down to enhance visualization of higher uptake regions. Comparison of Logan DVR (B) and SUVR80–100 (C) against indirect calculations of DVR given VT/VTref with distribution volumes estimated by compartmental modeling with arterial input functions and VTref corresponding to cerebellum. CB = cerebellum; PC = parietal cortex; PCg = posterior cingulate gyrus; PCUN = precuneus; MTC = mesial temporal cortex.

Figure 5 shows SUVR time courses along with Logan DVR and 2Tv VT/VTref estimates for 3 regions in 1 control subject and 1 MCI subject. The control subject reached a plateau in all regions within about 20 min. In the higher uptake regions of the MCI subject, a plateau began by approximately 80–90 min.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

SUVR time courses (symbols), DVR estimated directly by Logan regression with reference region inputs (horizontal solid lines), and DVR estimated indirectly by VT/VTref from compartmental modeling with arterial inputs (horizontal dashed lines) for control subject (subject 3) and MCI subject (subject 9). CB = cerebellum; PC = parietal cortex; PCg = posterior cingulate gyrus; MTC = mesial temporal cortex.

18F-T807 Parametric Images

18F-T807 Logan VTtissue/VTref, Logan DVR, and SUVR80–100 maps generated using the cerebellum as a reference region are shown in Figure 6 for 1 control subject, 1 subject who had been in an automobile accident approximately 2 y before imaging with 18F-T807, and 2 MCI subjects. Also displayed is the subject’s MPRAGE image in standardized space of the same slice for localization. Overall features are comparable for the alternative PET analysis methods; however, some discrepancies can be observed. For instance, SUVR80–100 has a generally noisier appearance and exhibits relatively higher signal in white matter than either of the kinetic analysis methods, a phenomenon most prominent in the control and TBI subjects. Conversely, signal in the basal ganglia is reduced in the SUVR80–100 images as compared with maps obtained by Logan regression methods; similar patterns are present elsewhere, notably in the occipital lobe of one MCI subject (subject 8) and in the frontal cortex of the other (subject 9).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

MPRAGE in template space and parametric images of indirect calculation of DVR using Logan (VT/VT(CB)), Logan DVR, and SUVR in control subject (subject 3), a subject with history of TBI (subject 5), and 2 subjects with MCI (subjects 8 and 9).

DISCUSSION

There has been a great effort toward the development of PET imaging agents for tau pathology because of the implication of tau in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease and TBI. 18F-T807 was developed for PET imaging of tau pathology. It has been widely used in research studies and is currently undergoing clinical trials as a diagnostic PET radiotracer. Despite its expanding use, a full characterization of 18F-T807’s pharmacokinetics has yet to be investigated. The goal of this work was to provide an initial in vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation of the tau radiotracer 18F-T807 using metabolite-corrected arterial input functions and dynamic PET imaging data. Herein, we evaluate subjects who present a range of 18F-T807 uptake to properly assess different methods for quantification and to provide a preliminary analysis of simplified reference region–based methods.

18F-T807 in Blood

Radioactivity concentration in whole blood demonstrated rapid clearance, with approximately 4% of the initial peak radioactivity present at 20 min after injection. Nonpolar radioactive metabolites detected using radio-HPLC were minimal. Furthermore, high intersubject consistency was found in 18F-T807 metabolism, and 18F-T807 breakdown resulted primarily in polar metabolites. For this analysis, we found a group %PP function to be adequate because of the high similarity in 18F-T807 metabolism between subjects as the group %PP versus subject-specific %PP correction resulted in highly concordant estimates of VT as shown in Supplemental Figure 4 (R2=0.99, y=1.02x0.09,P<0.0001).

Cerebellum as Reference Region

For simplified quantification methods beyond SUV, a reference region void of radiotracer target is necessary to provide a surrogate for the arterial input function. Of the regions examined in this work, the cerebellum showed the lowest variability in VT and the lowest overall VT. Additionally, the cerebellum showed fast wash-in and fast clearance, resulting in low overall specific binding of 18F-T807. In the control and TBI subjects, some regions exhibited DVR values < 1; however, regional DVRs in MCI subjects were ≥ 1. Other potential reference regions examined in this work included parts of the brain stem comprising the pons and medulla; however, high variability in VT was found in these areas. This preliminary analysis supports the use of the cerebellum as the most appropriate reference region. Because of the particular staging of tau in Alzheimer disease, we do not anticipate that the cerebellum will comprise significant tau deposition (17,31,32). Subjects with TBI, on the other hand, could potentially present with tau in a less predictable manner. Ultimately, a larger study set will be required to fully validate the cerebellum as a reference region in Alzheimer disease subjects and subjects with TBI.

Simplified Approaches for Quantification of 18F-T807 Uptake

We examined simplified approaches for quantification of 18F-T807 uptake including the Logan method for estimation of DVR and SUVR. High correlation was observed between compartmental modeling–based estimates of VT/VTref using the cerebellum as a reference and estimates of Logan DVR and SUVR indicating reference region–based estimates of 18F-T807 uptake will be an adequate alternative to full arterial sampling and compartmental modeling. Examination of truncated imaging times on Logan DVR estimation showed that results from 90 min of data were comparable to those from 120 min, whereas 60 min of data yielded biases of > 10%. SUVR overestimated VT/VTref when compared with the Logan DVR method; however, reasons for this overestimation have been discussed in the literature (33,34). Plots of SUVR time course suggested at least 80–100 min of time would be required for high 18F-T807 binding regions to reach pseudoequilibrium with the reference region, which is similar to previously suggested SUVR imaging times (12). Comparison of SUVR maps using 40–60 min, 80–100 min, and 100–120 min are shown in Supplemental Figure 5. As demonstrated, SUVRs from 80–100 min and 100–120 min are comparable, but SUVRs from 40 to 60 have not reached peak values. In the lower binding subjects and regions, however, about 30 min are necessary for SUVR to become stable. These results provide compelling evidence that late static imaging may serve in place of full dynamic imaging with arterial blood sampling.

18F-T807 Uptake and Distribution

18F-T807 demonstrated high brain penetration, with an SUVpeak immediately after injection of greater than 2 in gray matter. Additionally, K1 averaged 0.25 across subjects and regions, indicating moderately high brain extraction. Previous work has shown THK5105 to have high nonspecific white matter binding (11). This nonspecific uptake is attributed to β-sheet structures in myelin and could be problematic for quantification of tau. SUVpeak of 18F-T807 in white matter averaged 1.92 and SUVR80–120 min in white matter was 1.15 ± 0.1, indicating mild nonspecific white matter binding. In contrast to 18F-T808, uptake in the skull was minimal for 18F-T807 (Supplemental Fig. 6), indicating low defluorination.

As the parametric images in Figure 6 indicate, 18F-T807 uptake can be quantified reliably using graphical methods or SUVR. Images of SUVR were the lowest quality, with apparent uptake in white matter that was not observed in the VT or DVR maps; however, SUVR seemed to be adequate for delineation and estimation of relative uptake of 18F-T807.

Overall, distribution of 18F-T807 in the control subjects was generally uniform, with no cortical areas expressing high distribution. Although not explicitly examined in this work, intersubject heterogeneity in uptake was observed in subcortical areas, for example, the thalamus and putamen. Similar off-target binding results have been observed (35). In addition, our previous autoradiography work demonstrated off-target binding to neuromelanin- and melanin-containing cells as well as hemorrhagic lesions (17). Further examination of this off-target subcortical binding is warranted. The subject with a severe TBI due to an automobile accident expressed 1 region of high uptake protruding from the posterior regions of the corpus callosum into the posterior cingulate gyrus, possibly as a result of brain injury. Finally, the 2 MCI subjects demonstrated different distributions in uptake. Subject 8 had highest uptake in the occipital regions. Subject 9, on the other hand, demonstrated high 18F-T807 uptake in areas associated with staging of tau in Alzheimer disease (31) including temporal, parietal, posterior cingulate, and precuneus regions.

This work had some limitations, including no test–retest data. However, we observed low variability in blood data and cerebellar VT across subjects, indicating test–retest variability would also be low. Use of a groupwise 18F-T807 metabolism correction is a limitation, and a full examination of intersubject variability in 18F-T807 metabolism would be helpful to determine whether differences exist between groups (MCI, TBI, and controls). Additionally, we examined only tauopathies related to MCI subjects and subjects with history of brain injury. A thorough investigation of 18F-T807 kinetics in subjects with related tauopathies (e.g., frontotemporal dementia) will be necessary to determine whether the 18F-T807 kinetic properties found in this work translate to other tau-related diseases. Even though for most subjects a 2-tissue-reversible model was preferred based on AIC, we found preference for the irreversible model in our TBI subjects. A full examination of 18F-T807 kinetics in TBI subjects with a range of binding is needed to investigate this apparent discrepancy. Finally, our overall subject number was low; however, the subjects examined in this work had a wide range of dynamic 18F-T807 uptake, allowing evaluation of 18F-T807’s kinetics in subjects with the highest binding expected as indicated by Johnson et al. who found highest 18F-T807 posterior cingulate SUVRs between 2 to 2.5 (18).

CONCLUSION

18F-T807 showed low intersubject variability in metabolism rate and overall rapid clearance in plasma. Two-tissue-reversible compartmental modeling using 18F-T807 arterial input function resulted in close agreement with linearized methods of VT estimation using both Logan (26) and MA1 (27). The cerebellum exhibited properties required for use as a reference region in place of arterial sampling. These initial results show promise for a simplified reference region–based protocol, negating arterial sampling and using late static imaging with the goal of shorter scan times. Reference region–based methods of quantification including Logan DVR with a t* = 55 min and SUVR from 80 to 100 min tracked closely with compartmental modeling based outcome measures using arterial plasma input functions. Lastly, these results demonstrate that 18F-T807 possesses the properties necessary for quantification of tau using PET imaging. Further studies will be needed to fully characterize the use of the cerebellum as a valid reference region in a heterogeneous population.

DISCLOSURE

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Supplementary Material

REFERENCES

  • 1.Iqbal K, Liu F, Gong CX, Grundke-Iqbal I. Tau in Alzheimer disease and related tauopathies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:656–664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.James OG, Doraiswamy PM, Borges-Neto S. PET imaging of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease and tauopathies. Front Neurol. 2015;6:38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, et al. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goldstein LE, Fisher AM, Tagge CA, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:134ra60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKee AC, Cantu RC, Nowinski CJ, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in athletes: progressive tauopathy after repetitive head injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2009;68:709–735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ariza M, Kolb HC, Moechars D, Rombouts F, Andres JI. tau positron emission tomography (PET) imaging: past, present, and future. J Med Chem. 2015;58:4365–4382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Agdeppa ED, Kepe V, Liu J, et al. Binding characteristics of radiofluorinated 6-dialkylamino-2-naphthylethylidene derivatives as positron emission tomography imaging probes for beta-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hashimoto H, Kawamura K, Igarashi N, et al. Radiosynthesis, photoisomerization, biodistribution, and metabolite analysis of 11C-PBB3 as a clinically useful PET probe for imaging of tau pathology. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1532–1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kimura Y, Ichise M, Ito H, et al. PET quantification of tau pathology in human brain with 11C-PBB3. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1359–1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Harada R, Okamura N, Furumoto S, et al. 18F-THK5351: a novel PET radiotracer for imaging neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:208–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Okamura N, Furumoto S, Fodero-Tavoletti MT, et al. Non-invasive assessment of Alzheimer’s disease neurofibrillary pathology using 18F-THK5105 PET. Brain. 2014;137:1762–1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, et al. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. JAD. 2013;34:457–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xia C-F, Arteaga J, Chen G, et al. [18F]T807, a novel tau positron emission tomography imaging agent for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:666–676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang W, Arteaga J, Cashion DK, et al. A highly selective and specific PET tracer for imaging of tau pathologies. JAD. 2012;31:601–612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chien DT, Szardenings AK, Bahri S, et al. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F18]-T808. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;38:171–184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shoup TM, Yokell DL, Rice PA, et al. A concise radiosynthesis of the tau radiopharmaceutical, [18F]T807. J Labelled Comp Radiopharm. 2013;56:736–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Marquié M, Normandin MD, Vanderburg CR, et al. Validating novel tau positron emission tomography tracer [F-18]-AV-1451 (T807) on postmortem brain tissue. Ann Neurol. 2015;78:787–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, et al. Tau PET imaging in aging and early Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79:110–119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Nitz WRMP. RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence–initial experience in the brain. Radiology. 1992;182:769–775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alpert NM, Berdichevsky D, Levin Z, Morris ED, Fischman AJ. Improved methods for image registration. Neuroimage. 1996;3:10–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Grabner G, Janke AL, Budge MM, Smith D, Pruessner J, Collins DL. Symmetric atlasing and model based segmentation: an application to the hippocampus in older adults. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2006;9(Pt 2):58–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM. FSL. Neuroimage. 2012;62:782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Collier T, Normandin M, El Fakhri G, Vasdev N. Automation of column-switching HPLC for analysis of radiopharmaceuticals and their metabolites in plasma [abstract]. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1133. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hilton J, Yokoi F, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Szabo Z, Wong DF. Column-switching HPLC for the analysis of plasma in PET imaging studies. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27:627–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Innis RB, Cunningham VJ, Delforge J, Fujita M, Gjedde A, Gunn RN. Consensus nomenclature for in vivo imaging of reversibly binding radioligands. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1533–1539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, et al. Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1990;10:740–747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ichise M, Toyama H, Innis RB, Carson RE. Strategies to improve neuroreceptor parameter estimation by linear regression analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002;22:1271–1281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Alexoff DL. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1996;16:834–840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19:716–723. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Burnham KP, Anderson DR, Burnham KP. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Braak H, Braak E. Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol (Berl). 1991;82:239–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.McKee AC, Stern RA, Nowinski CJ, et al. The spectrum of disease in chronic traumatic encephalopathy. Brain. 2013;136:43–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Slifstein M. Revisiting an old issue: the discrepancy between tissue ratio-derived binding parameters and kinetic modeling-derived parameters after a bolus of the serotonin transporter radioligand 123I-ADAM. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:176–178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Carson RE, Channing MA, Blasberg RG, et al. Comparison of bolus and infusion methods for receptor quantitation: application to 18F-cyclofoxy and positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13:24–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shcherbinin S, Schwarz AJ, Joshi AD, et al. Kinetics of the tau PET tracer 18F-AV-1451 (T807) in subjects with normal cognitive function, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:1535–1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Journal of Nuclear Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

RESOURCES