ABSTRACT
Biofilms on wound surfaces are treated topically with hyperosmotic agents, such as medical-grade honey and cadexomer iodine; in some cases, these treatments are combined with antibiotics. Tissue repair requires oxygen, and a low pH is conducive to oxygen release from red blood cells and epithelialization. We investigated the variation of dissolved oxygen concentration and pH with biofilm depth and the variation in oxygen consumption rates when biofilms are challenged with medical-grade honey or cadexomer iodine combined with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. Dissolved oxygen and pH depth profiles in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms were measured using microelectrodes. The presence of cadexomer iodine with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin on the surface of the biofilm permitted a measurable concentration of oxygen at greater biofilm depths (101.6 ± 27.3 μm, P = 0.02; and 155.5 ± 27.9 μm, P = 0.016, respectively) than in untreated controls (30.1 μm). Decreases in pH of ∼0.6 and ∼0.4 units were observed in biofilms challenged with medical-grade honey alone and combined with ciprofloxacin, respectively (P < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively); the number of bacteria recovered from biofilms was significantly reduced (1.26 log) by treatment with cadexomer iodine and ciprofloxacin (P = 0.002) compared to the untreated control. Combining cadexomer iodine and ciprofloxacin improved dissolved oxygen concentration and penetration depth into the biofilm, while medical-grade honey was associated with a lower pH; not all treatments established a bactericidal effect in the time frame used in the experiments.
IMPORTANCE Reports about using hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics against wound biofilms focus mostly on killing bacteria, but the results of these treatments should additionally be considered in the context of how they affect physiologically important parameters, such as oxygen concentration and pH. We confirmed that the combination of a hyperosmotic agent and an antibiotic results in greater dissolved oxygen and reduced pH within an S. aureus biofilm.
KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, biofilm, hyperosmotic agent, dissolved oxygen, pH
INTRODUCTION
Biofilms form on tissue wounds (1) and on the surfaces of implanted medical devices (2, 3). In both locations, biofilms can cause persistent infections. Biofilms protect bacteria from opsonization, antibiotic exposure, and phagocytosis (4–6). Staphylococcus aureus, a common human pathogen, is often associated with biofilm infections (7–9) in chronic wounds (8, 10, 11). Such infections are problematic to treat because of the slow penetration of antimicrobials and antibiotics through the biofilm matrix (10, 12–14) and the formation of persister cells (15). In vitro experiments have demonstrated that the bacterial gene regulation and resistance to antibiotics inside a biofilm differ from cell responses in planktonic culture (2, 5, 16–18). Furthermore, biofilm formation causes oxygen depletion (19), an increase in pH near the tissue surface, and delays in wound healing (20, 21). Availability of dissolved oxygen (DO) and reduced pH are two important factors that promote angiogenesis and increase macrophage infiltration and fibroblast activity (21–23). The pH of healthy skin ranges from 4.2 to 5.6 (24). Therefore, faster wound healing is likely to occur when wounds are treated in a manner that improves antibiotic delivery while maintaining oxygen availability and reducing pH in the wound bed.
Some researchers report that antibiotics do not effectively penetrate biofilms (25, 26), while others report rapid penetration (2, 27). Consistent with this discrepancy is the observation that specific antibiotics are required at higher dosages to treat biofilms (28–30). Additionally, the balance of water activity plays a critical role in a wide range of cellular and antibiotic functions and in mass transport in biofilms (31–33). A shift to a hyperosmotic environment challenges biofilm homeostasis, which in turn threatens the integrity of bacterial cellular membranes (34–36), improves antibiotic effectiveness (37), and exhausts the buffering capacity of bacterial cytoplasm, which may also result in a reduction in pH (38, 39). Thus, combining a high concentration of antibiotics with a hyperosmotic agent offers an alternative treatment strategy for biofilm communities.
DO from the atmosphere is an important source of oxygen during wound healing (40, 41), because tissue oxygenation is limited to capillaries near the skin surface (42). Oxygen is needed for collagen formation, angiogenesis, and epithelialization (42). When a biofilm is present on the wound surface, it competes for DO and depletes it before the oxygen can diffuse into the wound bed (43–45). Furthermore, chronic wounds have an alkaline environment, which retards wound healing and affects oxygen availability (46, 47). Therefore, it is crucial to find effective strategies to increase the DO concentration at the bottom of the biofilm and create a more acidic environment. Hyperosmotic concentrations of agents, such as medical-grade honey (48, 49) and cadexomer iodine (50, 51), have been considered for wound treatment. Recently, it was shown that hyperosmotic concentrations of maltodextrin increased the efficiency of vancomycin against S. aureus biofilms by reducing biofilm coverage, thickness, and diffusion distance, as well as by improving the DO concentration within the biofilm (37). To the best of our knowledge, the variation in DO concentration and pH in S. aureus biofilms that are treated with medical-grade honey or cadexomer iodine combined with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin has not been investigated.
The goal of this research was to investigate DO penetration and pH change in S. aureus biofilms challenged with medical-grade honey or cadexomer iodine in combination with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin (52, 53) and vancomycin (2, 27) are commonly used to treat bacterial infections. Ciprofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone that interferes with DNA replication through direct interaction with topoisomerases and DNA gyrase proteins (54). Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic that works by binding to the d-alanyl–d-alanine portion of the peptide side chain of the peptidoglycan strand that encompasses the cell wall, leading to the inhibition of cell wall synthesis (54). Biofilms were grown on membranes resting on agar surfaces where biofilm communities received nutrients from growth medium agar and oxygen from the air. This allowed growth of biofilms in a manner relevant to infections growing on wound surfaces. We treated S. aureus biofilms with (i) medical-grade honey alone, (ii) cadexomer iodine alone, (iii) sucrose alone, (iv) vancomycin alone, (v) ciprofloxacin alone, (vi) medical-grade honey with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin, (vii) cadexomer iodine with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin, and (viii) sucrose with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin, with the goal of identifying the conditions that allow the highest oxygen delivery. DO and pH depth profiles were measured using microelectrodes to quantify the oxygen consumption rate and the oxygen penetration depth in the biofilms and to investigate how pH changes inside the biofilms. Finally, we quantified the number of recovered cells after each treatment.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The MIC for planktonic S. aureus culture was 0.74 μg/ml (0.5 μM) for vancomycin and 0.77 μg/ml (2 μM) for ciprofloxacin (see Fig. SI1 in the supplemental material). These values are consistent with the values reported by other researchers (55, 56). Because biofilms protect bacterial communities (5, 57), we used a higher concentration (4 mM) of ciprofloxacin and vancomycin to increase the probability of killing the bacteria.
Effects of hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics on dissolved oxygen penetration.
DO depth profiles from four locations in an untreated S. aureus biofilm showed almost identical trends (Fig. 1). This indicates that the profiles were reproducible when they were measured at different locations. Almost 99% of oxygen was consumed within the top 50 ± 5 μm of the biofilm.
FIG 1.
Dissolved oxygen (DO) depth profiles of untreated S. aureus biofilm measured at randomly selected different locations (100 μm apart from each other) in the biofilm.
Biofilms treated with vancomycin and ciprofloxacin showed similar DO depth profiles (Fig. 2A), indicating that they have a similar effect on the DO availability in biofilms. DO was no longer detectable below a depth of 55.2 ± 5 μm from the biofilm surface in the control, whereas DO was detectable to a depth of 60.2 ± 5 μm in biofilms treated with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. When the biofilm was treated sequentially with 90% medical-grade honey and 4 mM vancomycin or ciprofloxacin (Fig. 2B), DO penetrated further into the biofilm, although the effect was not significant compared to the untreated control (P = 0.18 and 1.0, respectively) or compared to the individual treatments of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin (P > 0.05).
FIG 2.
The dissolved oxygen (DO) depth profiles inside the S. aureus colony biofilms. (A) Ciprofloxacin (C; 4 mM) and vancomycin (V; 4 mM) were applied to the top of colony biofilm and incubated for 8 h separately. (B) Medical-grade honey (MGH; 90%) was applied for 20 h, and then solutions with and without 4 mM C and 4 mM V were applied for 8 h sequentially. (C) Cadexomer iodine (CI; 90%) was applied for 20 h, and then solutions with and without 4 mM C and 4 mM V were applied for 8 h sequentially. The data are means, and the error bars represent the standard deviations of the means of the results from at least triplicate measurements.
DO concentration within biofilms was increased when they were treated with 90% cadexomer iodine and antibiotics (Fig. 2C); at a 60 ± 5 μm depth from the biofilm surface, the DO concentrations were 0.07 ± 0.03 mg/liter, 0.31 ± 0.1 mg/liter, 3.06 ± 1.5 mg/liter, and 3.4 ± 0.80 mg/liter for the control, 90% cadexomer iodine only, cadexomer iodine with vancomycin, and cadexomer iodine with ciprofloxacin, respectively. At a depth of 60 ± 5 μm, the DO concentration was significantly greater when the biofilm was treated with cadexomer iodine and vancomycin or ciprofloxacin (P = 0.02 and 0.016, respectively) with respect to the untreated control. In addition, the DO concentration at a depth of 60 ± 5 μm was significantly greater in biofilms treated with cadexomer iodine and ciprofloxacin than in the biofilm treated with ciprofloxacin alone (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the combined treatments were associated with detectable DO at greater depths within the biofilms. To illustrate, a DO concentration of ∼1 mg/liter was evident at depths of 30.1 μm, 101.6 ± 27.3 μm, and 155.5 ± 27.9 μm for the control, cadexomer iodine with vancomycin, and cadexomer iodine with ciprofloxacin, respectively. The depth of detectable DO increased when the biofilm was challenged with cadexomer iodine and vancomycin or ciprofloxacin (P = 0.01 and 0.001, respectively, compared to the untreated control). Moreover, the depth of detectable DO with cadexomer iodine and ciprofloxacin treatment was significantly greater than when vancomycin was used in conjunction with cadexomer iodine (P = 0.044 between cadexomer iodine with vancomycin and cadexomer iodine with ciprofloxacin treatment). Similarly, DO concentration increased when biofilm was subjected to combined treatments of sucrose and vancomycin or ciprofloxacin (data not shown); at a depth 60.2 ± 5 μm, the DO concentrations for sucrose alone, sucrose with vancomycin, and sucrose with ciprofloxacin were 0.43 ± 0.16 mg/liter, 0.95 ± 0.60 mg/liter, and 1.43 ± 0.57 mg/liter, respectively.
Treatment with cadexomer iodine resulted in the presence of DO at a greater depth than in biofilm treated with medical-grade honey, even when combined with antibiotics (Fig. 2B and C). In addition, the results indicate that the application of a hyperosmotic agent with an antibiotic improves the amount of DO available deep within the biofilm. This is further supported by the same results being obtained when the biofilm was treated with a combination of sucrose and antibiotics. In a surface wound environment, the presence of DO aids collagen formation, angiogenesis, and epithelialization of human tissues for improved wound healing (42).
Effects of hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics on biofilm oxygen consumption.
A change in the slope of a DO profile relative to an untreated control indicates a difference in the rate of oxygen consumption throughout the biofilm (Fig. 3A). When the biofilm was treated with 4 mM vancomycin or 4 mM ciprofloxacin alone, the oxygen consumption rate decreased by 11.8% ± 3.69% or 15.0% ± 4.96%, respectively (P > 0.05); treatment with 90% medical-grade honey alone or 90% cadexomer iodine alone also failed to induce a significant change (P = 0.99 in both cases) compared to the untreated control. Importantly, however, the rate of oxygen consumption decreased for biofilms that were challenged with medical-grade honey and vancomycin (P = 0.006). The greatest reduction was observed when biofilms were treated with cadexomer iodine and vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. Sequentially treating biofilms with cadexomer iodine and then either vancomycin or ciprofloxacin reduced the oxygen consumption rate by 65.0% ± 3.86% (P < 0.001) and 69.1% ± 5.96% (P < 0.001), respectively. These findings are consistent with the increasing DO concentration after these treatments (reported above and in Fig. 2C). A reduced rate of oxygen consumption is consistent with cell death or with a transition to anaerobic respiration.
FIG 3.
The relative rates of oxygen consumption of S. aureus biofilm (A) and planktonic culture (B) after various treatments. Data are normalized with the control to show percentage change from the control. The data are means, and the error bars represent the standard deviations of the means of the results from at least triplicate measurements. Stars indicate statistically significant differences of treated samples from the untreated controls (⋆, P < 0.05; ⋆⋆, P < 0.001). V, vancomycin; C, ciprofloxacin; MGH, medical-grade honey; CI, cadexomer iodine; S, sucrose.
To provide insight into the mechanism behind these observations, we measured the oxygen consumption rates of planktonic cultures during exponential growth. The rates of oxygen consumption of planktonic cultures treated with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin alone were not significantly different (P = 1 for both) from that of the untreated control culture (Fig. 3B). It has been reported in the literature that treatment with bactericidal concentrations of antibiotics is associated with accelerated cell respiration (58). This respiratory acceleration leads to a state of “overflow metabolism” and formation of reactive species that contribute to the lethality of the antibiotics (59). Given the bactericidal nature of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, this is a plausible explanation for the apparent lack of effect on oxygen consumption relative to the untreated control culture. In contrast, planktonic cultures treated with medical-grade honey alone or cadexomer iodine alone showed a significant decrease in the rate of oxygen consumption (P = 0.006 and <0.001, respectively) compared to the untreated planktonic culture, consistent with reduced cell respiration. The effect of hyperosmotic agents alone was augmented in the planktonic cultures; this is possibly explained by the slow release of the antimicrobial iodine from the cadexomer polymer and the hyperosmotic effect from medical-grade honey and sucrose that resulted in slow growth. Moreover, the planktonic cultures lack the restricted diffusion present in biofilms due to the extracellular polymeric substance (EPS).
A combination of medical-grade honey or cadexomer iodine with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin reduced the rate of oxygen consumption (Fig. 3A), a result that is consistent with higher concentrations of DO at greater depths in the biofilms. The increased DO penetration is consistent with either cell death or quiescence. Besides the antibacterial activity of the two antibiotics, medical-grade honey (60, 61) induces cell death through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), while cadexomer iodine rapidly penetrates cells, where it damages proteins, nucleotides, and fatty acids, culminating in cell death (62–64). Cell death is consistent with higher DO concentrations deeper into the biofilm because diffusing oxygen is no longer used by bacteria. This is important because it is generally accepted that the correction of wound hypoxia is needed to support healing (41). For planktonic culture, the rate was also significantly decreased when hyperosmotic agents were combined with antibiotics (Fig. 3B) compared to the untreated planktonic culture. Here, we have shown that treatment with a hyperosmotic agent and an antibiotic together improves DO concentration at deeper levels within a biofilm.
Effects of hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics on biofilm pH.
The pH depth ranged from ∼7.3 to ∼7.0 from the liquid-biofilm surface to within the control biofilm (Fig. 4). Similarly, the pH of biofilm treated with 4 mM vancomycin or ciprofloxacin ranged from ∼7.2 to ∼7.0 (Fig. 4A). The experimentally measured pH levels of the vancomycin and ciprofloxacin solutions before they were added to the biofilms were ∼3.7 and ∼4.8, respectively. However, it is evident that the biofilms treated with vancomycin alone or ciprofloxacin alone showed a neutral pH, similar to the control. Biofilms are able to sustain a neutral or an alkaline state, which is a suitable environment for biofilm growth and maintenance, in the presence of an antibiotic (22, 65, 66). S. aureus has an optimal pH for growth of ∼7 (67, 68).
FIG 4.
The pH depth profiles inside S. aureus biofilm treated with and without 4 mM ciprofloxacin (C) or vancomycin (V) (A), with 90% medical-grade honey (MGH) and 4 mM C or 4 mM V sequentially (B), and with 90% cadexomer iodine (CI) and 4 mM C or 4 mM V sequentially (C). The initial pH values of the vancomycin and ciprofloxacin solutions were ∼3.7 and ∼4.8, respectively. One replicate is shown here to represent all three replicates.
At a depth of 150 ± 10 μm, the pH of the biofilm decreased significantly, to 6.2 ± 0.1 (P < 0.001), when 90% medical-grade honey alone was introduced (Fig. 4B) compared to the untreated control. Similarly, a significant decrease in pH was observed for biofilm treated with medical-grade honey and ciprofloxacin, with a P value of 0.01 (Fig. 4B). With respect to the untreated control, cadexomer iodine with or without antibiotic did not show a significant effect (P > 0.05) on pH change (Fig. 4C). Thus, the colony biofilms treated with medical-grade honey alone and sequentially with ciprofloxacin showed low pH; decreases in pH of ∼0.6 and ∼0.4 units, respectively, were observed compared to the control at a depth of ∼150 μm. A key factor in the efficacy of honey is its low pH, because this can be inhibitory to bacterial growth (69, 70) and likely induces acid stress in the biofilm. In addition, enzymatic production of hydrogen peroxide (an ROS) occurs naturally in honey (60, 61). With a higher DO concentration facilitated by low pH, ROS generation is presumably increased. Other mechanistic effects of medical-grade honey include low water activity and high sugar content, leading to osmotic stress (71). Our findings for medical-grade honey are consistent with the reported pH of honey in the literature (70).
A low pH on the wound bed promotes epithelialization and oxygen delivery from the blood capillaries (46, 72–74). Ono et al. (24) reported a decrease in pH along with the promotion of epithelialization in noninfected burn wounds, whereas an increase in pH was observed in wounds as infections progressed inside them. Thus, it is crucial to stimulate an acidic environment on the wound bed to promote healing. Additionally, antibiotics can fail to penetrate microbial biofilms (25); the ability of an antibiotic to penetrate a biofilm depends on the rate at which it is deactivated. Agents that experience reactive neutralization in the biofilm are prone to penetration failure (75). Moreover, antibiotic efficacy is affected by pH (76); ciprofloxacin was found to decrease its activity in a low-pH environment (77, 78). Ciprofloxacin is a piperazine-containing fluoroquinolone which is negatively charged at physiological pH (79). This is found to be its most active form. However, when the pH is low, the charge becomes positive. This positive charge may affect the penetration of ciprofloxacin into the bacteria and decrease their activity. Based on Fig. SI2, the MIC of ciprofloxacin increased by 3-fold when the pH of the medium was 6 rather than 7. Moreover, the MIC increased by 15-fold when the pH of the medium was 5 rather than 7. The MIC results (Fig. SI2) confirm the negative effect of low pH on the activity of ciprofloxacin.
Cell viability after treatments with hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics.
The CFU counts of control and treated biofilms were determined under conditions identical to those used in the DO and pH depth profiling. Figure 5 shows the viable cells (in CFU per milliliter) inside the S. aureus colony biofilm under the various treatment conditions. Vancomycin alone had little effect (P > 0.05) on recovered bacterial counts (0.5-log reduction; Fig. 5), whereas ciprofloxacin alone reduced CFU counts by 0.8 log. A reduction of only 0.4 log was observed in biofilms treated with medical-grade honey, which is not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the untreated control. When both hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics were administered, log reductions of 0.6 to 1.2 were observed. Among the treatments, cadexomer iodine with ciprofloxacin yielded the highest significant reduction (1.26-log reduction; P < 0.001) compared to the untreated control. The controlled release of iodine and improved penetration of ciprofloxacin possibly contributed to the significant killing with the combined treatment. It is important to note that the molecular mass of vancomycin (vancomycin hydrochloride hydrate) is 1,485.71 g/mol and that of ciprofloxacin (ciprofloxacin hydrochloride monohydrate) is 385.82 g/mol. Among all the active compounds, the smaller molecules have higher activities for specific cells (80). In addition, antibiotics are effective when cells are metabolically active and use oxygen as an electron acceptor; aminoglycosides are oxygen transport dependent, while beta-lactams and vancomycin inhibit actively dividing cells (81–83). Furthermore, the availability of oxygen deeper within the biofilm can stimulate dormant cells to respire aerobically, leading to an active metabolism that is favorable for antibiotic killing.
FIG 5.
The effect of sequential treatment with hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics on CFU of S. aureus biofilms. The treatments are 4 mM vancomycin (V), 4 mM ciprofloxacin (C), 90% medical-grade honey (MGH), 90% cadexomer iodine (CI), and 90% sucrose (S). The data are means of the results from at least three biological replicates. The error bars represent standard deviations of the means of the results from triplicate measurements. The stars indicate statistically significant differences from the untreated control biofilm (⋆⋆, P < 0.001; ⋆, P = 0.002 for 4 mM C and P = 0.004 for 90% CI; n = 3).
Despite the successful reduction in the number of viable bacteria, we generally failed to achieve the >3-log reduction (99.9% decrease in cell number) that is generally considered an effective bactericidal effect (84). However, clinical treatments with compounds, such as cadexomer iodine and medical-grade honey, are usually administered for weeks, and the applications are repeatedly replaced with fresh dressings within the treatment period (85–88). Consequently, while the effect may appear limited, this does not account for the repeated and lengthy exposure that would occur in clinical cases. In the case of planktonic cultures, higher log reductions are observed overall for all treatments compared to biofilms: sucrose with a ciprofloxacin-treated culture had a 3-log reduction, and medical-grade honey alone reduced CFU about 2.29 log (Fig. SI3). This is expected, since planktonic cultures do not have the protection of extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) that biofilms have.
In summary, combining cadexomer iodine with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin significantly increased DO concentration and penetration depth within the biofilm compared to the untreated biofilm, with no significant bactericidal effect. In addition, the oxygen consumption rate was significantly reduced when the biofilm was treated sequentially with medical-grade honey and vancomycin, or with cadexomer iodine with vancomycin or ciprofloxacin. The addition of hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics caused a pH decrease, especially in biofilms treated with medical-grade honey only and sequentially with ciprofloxacin. The poor activity of ciprofloxacin in an acidic environment (90% medical-grade honey) could explain its minimal effect on DO penetration compared to that of vancomycin. Last, cell viability was reduced significantly for biofilms challenged with cadexomer iodine combined with ciprofloxacin in comparison to the untreated biofilm; the reduction was, however, not significant as a bactericidal effect. The resulting increased DO penetration depth and acidic environment in the biofilm, due to sequential treatment with hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics, are key points to consider when evaluating treatments for wound infection. This comprehensive study details an antibiotic delivery approach that both serves the purpose of effective biofilm elimination from wound surfaces and allows for a wound environment suitable for faster wound healing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and media.
Pure cultures of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC BAA-1747) were used in this study. Bacteria were streaked and grown on Trypticase soy agar (TSA) (catalog no. DF0369-17-6; Fisher Scientific, Palatine, IL, USA) at 37°C for 18 h. A single colony from the TSA plates was transferred into a 50-ml culture tube containing approximately 5 ml of Trypticase soy broth (TSB) (catalog no. DF0370-17-3; Fisher Scientific). The culture in TSB was incubated on a shaker (55 to 60 rpm) at 37°C and grown overnight.
MIC measurements.
Before selecting the doses for the antibiotics to treat S. aureus biofilms, we estimated the MICs of these two antibiotics against an overnight culture of S. aureus. The procedure defined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) was used, with minor changes (89). Briefly, 11.89 μg/ml and 3.09 μg/ml concentrations of vancomycin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, were diluted at 1:2 using TSB to a concentration close to zero. Finally, optical density (OD) at 595 nm was recorded at regular intervals using a BioAssay reader (PerkinElmer HTS 7000 Plus).
To determine the effect of pH on the activity of ciprofloxacin, MIC assays were performed on S. aureus planktonic culture for ciprofloxacin using various pH-adjusted batches of TSB (pHs of 5, 6, and 7 were tested). Similarly, the procedure defined by CLSI was used, with minor changes (89); 98.77 μg/ml ciprofloxacin was diluted at 1:2 using TSB at various pHs to a concentration close to zero. A bioassay reader was used, as described above.
Oxygen consumption rate assay for planktonic culture.
To assess the oxygen consumption of planktonic culture, a MitoXpress Xtra oxygen consumption assay (catalog no. MX-200; Luxcel Biosciences, Amsbio, Cambridge, MA, USA) was used. A 96-well black plate, TSB, and HS mineral oil (provided in the assay kit) were prewarmed separately to 37°C. Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.22 for the control and treatments with medical-grade honey alone, cadexomer iodine alone, vancomycin alone, and ciprofloxacin alone. Overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.25 for combined treatments with a hyperosmotic agent (2.9% medical-grade honey, 2.9% cadexomer iodine, or 2.9% sucrose) and an antibiotic (86.4 μM vancomycin or 86.4 μM ciprofloxacin). Aliquots (150 μl of OD600 of 0.22 and 140 μl of OD600 of 0.25) were dispensed into the 96-well plate. Ten microliters of autoclaved deionized water and individual treatments were added to the 150-μl cultures. For combined treatments, 10 μl of a hyperosmotic agent (medical-grade honey, cadexomer iodine, or sucrose) and 10 μl of an antibiotic (vancomycin or ciprofloxacin) were added to the 140-μl culture. A 10-μl aliquot of the reconstituted MitoXpress Xtra reagent (in autoclaved deionized [DI] water) was then added to each well. Finally, two drops of prewarmed HS mineral oil were added to each well to limit diffusion of oxygen from air to the sample. The concentrations of hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics used against planktonic culture were selected to produce equivalent micrograms of treatment per CFU per milliliter to which biofilms were exposed. The well plate was read for 5 h at a time-resolved fluorescence setting with 380 ± 20 nm excitation, 650 ± 15 nm emission, a 30-μs delay, and a 100-μs measurement time (Cytation 5 microplate reader; Bio-tek, Winooski, VT, USA). The oxygen consumption rate was calculated from the linear portion of the signal profile over time.
Biofilm preparation.
Colony biofilms were grown as described previously (57), with minor modifications. Briefly, overnight planktonic cultures (18-h incubation) of S. aureus were diluted to an OD600 (1-cm path length) of 0.5 in TSB. A 5-μl aliquot of diluted culture was used to inoculate individual sterile black polycarbonate membrane filters (25-mm diameter, 0.2-μm pore size, catalog no. GTBP 025 00; Fisher Scientific, Palatine, IL, USA) resting on TSA plate culture medium (membranes were sterilized by UV exposure, 15 min per side, prior to inoculation). The plates were inverted and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. The membrane-supported biofilms were transferred to fresh TSA every 6 to 10 h.
Hyperosmotic agents and antibiotics.
Medical-grade honey (catalog no. UMF20+; Manuka Natural, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand) and cadexomer iodine gel (catalog no. b12261; Active Forever, Peoria, AZ, USA) were used in this study. Vancomycin hydrochloride and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (catalog no. 861987 and PHR1044, respectively). All chemical compounds were used as received, without further purification, and were dissolved in autoclaved filtered (0.2-μm pore size) nanopure water.
Treatments.
We used the following treatments and treatment combinations: (i) medical-grade honey alone, (ii) cadexomer iodine alone, (iii) vancomycin alone, (iv) ciprofloxacin alone, (v) medical-grade honey and vancomycin, (vi) medical-grade honey and ciprofloxacin, (vii) cadexomer iodine and vancomycin, (viii) cadexomer iodine and ciprofloxacin, (ix) sucrose alone, (x) sucrose and vancomycin, and (xi) sucrose and ciprofloxacin.
After 48 h, the biofilms were treated with 4 mM vancomycin (5,942.8 μg/ml) alone, 4 mM ciprofloxacin (1,471.2 μg/ml) alone, 90% medical-grade honey alone, or 90% cadexomer iodine alone. These compounds were added (15 μl for hyperosmotic agents and 10 μl for antibiotics) directly on top of the preformed biofilms. Treatment with an antibiotic or hyperosmotic agent alone was administered for 8 h or 20 h, respectively. Combined treatments were administered sequentially (20 h of treatment with a hyperosmotic agent and then 8 h of treatment with an antibiotic, for a total incubation of 28 h). Hyperosmotic agent and antibiotic concentrations were adjusted to maintain total concentrations of 90% and 4 mM, respectively. DO and pH depth profiles were measured inside the biofilms for each time frame of treatment. Control biofilms were measured after 48 h of growth.
Dissolved oxygen and pH microelectrodes.
DO and pH microelectrodes were constructed according to previously described protocols (90). The microelectrodes had tip diameters of <20 μm. DO microelectrodes were polarized to −800 mVAg/AgCl and calibrated using two-point calibration: in the air (oxygen saturation) and in a solution of 0.1 M sodium ascorbate and 0.1 M NaOH (without oxygen). The pH microelectrodes were constructed with liquid ion exchange (LIX; catalog no. 95297; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) membrane tips (90). Custom-made external Ag/AgCl reference electrodes with an agar salt bridge at the tip were used for pH measurements. Then, pH microelectrodes were calibrated in buffer solutions (pH 4, 7, and 10; catalog no. 910104, 910107, and 910110, respectively; Cole-Palmer, Vernon Hills, IL, USA).
A Keithley 6517A electrometer/high-resistance meter was used to operate both DO microelectrodes and pH microelectrodes. The measurement setup is shown in Fig. 6. For pH measurements, 50 μl of liquid medium was added on top of the biofilm to provide an ionic flow between the pH and reference electrodes. The microelectrode (DO or pH) was initially placed on top of the biofilm. The surface of the biofilm sample was determined using a Zeiss Stemi 2000 stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, Thornwood, NY, USA). After the microelectrode tip was located above the biofilm surface, the microelectrode was stepped down in 5-μm increments, except for the pH profiles measured for medical-grade honey and cadexomer iodine treatments. A 10-μm step size was used to measure pH profiles in biofilms treated with medical-grade honey and cadexomer iodine. A computer-controlled stepper motor (PI M-230.10S, part no. M23010SX; Physik Instrumente, Auburn, MA, USA) controlled with a custom-built microprofiling system was used to manipulate microelectrode movements. An analog-to-digital converter (ADC; USB-1608FS; Measurement Computing, Norton, MA, USA) was used to record the collected data.
FIG 6.

Colony biofilm and microelectrode experimental setup. The pH microelectrode setup differs by having an external reference electrode. AD, analog to digital.
The oxygen consumption rate was calculated using the DO depth profiles. At any given time, the oxygen consumption rate in a biofilm is equal to the oxygen flux through the biofilm-air interface (90, 91). Using Fick's first law of diffusion, the oxygen flux is calculated as the slope of the DO depth profile multiplied by the oxygen diffusion coefficient (0.178 cm2/s in air) (92).
Bacterial viability measurement.
CFU before and after treatments were quantified using methods described by Chen et al. (93). The results and errors represent average log10-transformed values and standard deviations of the results from triplicate independent experiments.
Data analysis.
All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Depth profiles, oxygen consumption rates, and CFU counts are presented and plotted as mean ± standard deviation, except for pH depth profiles. One replicate is shown to represent all three replicates. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post hoc test was performed to determine significant differences for all possible pairwise comparisons among treatments and control for oxygen consumption rates. A single-factor ANOVA with a post hoc pairwise comparison test and a Bonferroni correction were used to determine whether there was a significant difference between the DO concentrations and viabilities of control and treated biofilms. For statistically significant testing, we used a P value of ≤0.05. Calculations and statistical analyses were performed using SigmaPlot (versions 12.0 and 12.5).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was supported in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of Defense (grant DM110308) and by the Paul G. Allen School for Global Animal Health at Washington State University. Mia Mae Kiamco acknowledges support from NIH training grant T32 GM008336.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02783-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Potera C. 1999. Forging a link between biofilms and disease. Science 283:1837–1839. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5409.1837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Darouiche RO, Dhir A, Miller AJ, Landon GC, Raad II, Musher DM. 1994. Vancomycin penetration into biofilm covering infected prostheses and effect on bacteria. J Infect Dis 170:720–723. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.3.720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Younger JJ, Christensen GD, Bartley DL, Simmons JCH, Barrett FF. 1987. Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cerebrospinal-fluid shunts: importance of slime production, species identification, and shunt removal to clinical outcome. J Infect Dis 156:548–554. doi: 10.1093/infdis/156.4.548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jensen ET, Kharazmi A, Lam K, Costerton JW, Hoiby N. 1990. Human polymorphonuclear leukocyte response to Pseudomonas aeruginosa grown in biofilms. Infect Immun 58:2383–2385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. 1999. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science 284:1318–1322. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Claessens J, Roriz M, Merckx R, Baatsen P, Van Mellaert L, Van Eldere J. 2015. Inefficacy of vancomycin and teicoplanin in eradicating and killing Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms in vitro. Int J Antimicrob Agents 45:368–375. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yarwood JA, Paquette KA, Tikh IB, Volper EA, Greenberg EP. 2007. Generation of virulence factor variants in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol 189:7961–7967. doi: 10.1128/JB.00789-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Secor PR, James GA, Fleckman P, Olerud JE, McInnerney K, Stewart PS. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm and planktonic cultures differentially impact gene expression, mapk phosphorylation, and cytokine production in human keratinocytes. BMC Microbiol 11:143. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kirker KR, James GA, Fleckman P, Olerud JE, Stewart PS. 2012. Differential effects of planktonic and biofilm MRSA on human fibroblasts. Wound Repair Regen 20:253–261. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00769.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.James G, Swogger E, DeLancey-Pulcini E. 2009. Microbial ecology of human skin and wounds, p 1–14. In Shirtliff M, Leid JG (ed), Springer series on biofilms, vol 3: the role of biofilms in device-related infections. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 11.James GA, Swogger E, Wolcott R, Pulcini ED, Secor P, Sestrich J, Costerton JW, Stewart PS. 2008. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 16:37–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pour NK, Dusane DH, Dhakephalkar PK, Zamin FR, Zinjarde SS, Chopade BA. 2011. Biofilm formation by Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from urinary tract infection and urinary catheters. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 62:328–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00818.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ammons MCB, Ward LS, James GA. 2011. Anti-biofilm efficacy of a lactoferrin/xylitol wound hydrogel used in combination with silver wound dressings. Int Wound J 8:268–273. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00781.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mah TFC, O'Toole GA. 2001. Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol 9:34–39. doi: 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wood TK, Knabel SJ, Kwan BW. 2013. Bacterial persister cell formation and dormancy. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7116–7121. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02636-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Vrany JD, Stewart PS, Suci PA. 1997. Comparison of recalcitrance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin exhibited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms displaying rapid-transport characteristics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 41:1352–1358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ito A, Taniuchi A, May T, Kawata K, Okabe S. 2009. Increased antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli in mature biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4093–4100. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02949-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Resch A, Rosenstein R, Nerz C, Gotz F. 2005. Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2663–2676. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2663-2676.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu KD, Stewart PS, Xia F, Huang C-T, McFeters GA. 1998. Spatial physiological heterogeneity in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm is determined by oxygen availability. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4035–4039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lone AG, Atci E, Renslow R, Beyenal H, Noh S, Fransson B, Abu-Lail N, Park J-J, Gang DR, Call DR. 2015. Staphylococcus aureus induces hypoxia and cellular damage in porcine dermal explants. Infect Immun 83:2531–2541. doi: 10.1128/IAI.03075-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guo S, DiPietro LA. 2010. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 89:219–229. doi: 10.1177/0022034509359125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gethin G. 2007. The significance of surface pH in chronic wounds. Wounds UK 3:52–56. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hunt TK, Hopf H, Hussain Z. 2000. Physiology of wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care 13:6–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ono S, Imai R, Ida Y, Shibata D, Komiya T, Matsumura H. 2015. Increased wound pH as an indicator of local wound infection in second degree burns. Burns 41:820–824. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2014.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Shigeta M, Tanaka G, Komatsuzawa H, Sugai M, Suginaka H, Usui T. 1997. Permeation of antimicrobial agents through Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: a simple method. Chemotherapy 43:340–345. doi: 10.1159/000239587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kumon H, Tomochika K, Matunaga T, Ogawa M, Ohmori H. 1994. A sandwich cup method for the penetration assay of antimicrobial agents through Pseudomonas exopolysaccharides. Microbiol Immunol 38:615–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1994.tb01831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dunne WM Jr, Mason EO Jr, Kaplan SL. 1993. Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:2522–2526. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.12.2522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tegos GP, Haynes M, Strouse J, Khan MMT, Bologa CG, Oprea TI, Sklar LA. 2011. Microbial efflux pump inhibition: tactics and strategies. Curr Pharm Des 17:1291–1302. doi: 10.2174/138161211795703726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang YF, Lemieux MJ, Song JM, Auer M, Wang DN. 2003. Structure and mechanism of the glycerol-3-phosphate transporter from Escherichia coli. Science 301:616–620. doi: 10.1126/science.1087619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.He X, Szewczyk P, Karyakin A, Evin M, Hong W-X, Zhang Q, Chang G. 2010. Structure of a cation-bound multidrug and toxic compound extrusion transporter. Nature 467:991–994. doi: 10.1038/nature09408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ho SN. 2006. Intracellular water homeostasis and the mammalian cellular osmotic stress response. J Cell Physiol 206:9–15. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Miermont A, Waharte F, Hu SQ, McClean MN, Bottani S, Leon S, Hersen P. 2013. Severe osmotic compression triggers a slowdown of intracellular signaling, which can be explained by molecular crowding. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:5725–5730. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215367110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Csonka LN. 1989. Physiological and genetic responses of bacteria to osmotic stress. Microbiol Rev 53:121–147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lang F, Busch GL, Ritter M, Volkl H, Waldegger S, Gulbins E, Haussinger D. 1998. Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms. Physiol Rev 78:247–306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Russell AD. 2003. Bacterial outer membrane and cell wall penetration and cell destruction by polluting chemical agents and physical conditions. Sci Prog 86:283–311. doi: 10.3184/003685003783238608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Islam N, Kim Y, Ross JM, Marten MR. 2014. Proteomic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm cells grown under physiologically relevant fluid shear stress conditions. Proteome Sci 12:21–21. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-12-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kiamco MM, Atci E, Khan QF, Mohamed A, Renslow RS, Abu-Lail N, Fransson BA, Call DR, Beyenal H. 2015. Vancomycin and maltodextrin affect structure and activity of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:2562–2570. doi: 10.1002/bit.25681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Myhre BA, Demianew SH, Yoshimori RN, Nelson EJ, Carmen RA. 1985. pH changes caused by bacterial growth in contaminated platelet concentrates. Ann Clin Lab Sci 15:509–514. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Slonczewski JL, Fujisawa M, Dopson M, Krulwich TA. 2009. Cytoplasmic pH measurement and homeostasis in bacteria and archaea. Adv Microb Physiol 55:1–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gordillo GM, Sen CK. 2003. Revisiting the essential role of oxygen in wound healing. Am J Surg 186:259–263. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(03)00211-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sen CK. 2009. Wound healing essentials: let there be oxygen. Wound Repair Regen 17:1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00436.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stotts NA, Wipke-Tevis D, Hopf HW. 2014. Cofactors in impaired wound healing, p 79–86. In Krasner DL. (ed), Chronic wound care: the essentials. HMP Communications, LLC, Malvern, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 43.James GA, Nguyen HD, Beyenal H, Zhao AG, Agostinho AM, Pulcini ED, Usui M, Underwood R, Fleckman P, Olerud J, Stewart P. 2011. Bacterial biofilms are oxygen sinks in murine and in vitro models of wound infection. Wound Repair Regen 19:A28–A28. [Google Scholar]
- 44.George T, Rodeheaver CRR. 2014. Wound cleansing, wound irrigation, wound disinfection, p 53 In Krasner DL. (ed), Chronic wound care: the essentials. HMP Communications, LLC, Malvern, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 45.James GA, Zhao AG, Usui M, Underwood RA, Nguyen H, Beyenal H, deLancey Pulcini E, Hunt A, Bernstein HB, Fleckman P, Olerud J, Williamson KS, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS. 2016. Microsensor and transcriptomic signatures of oxygen depletion in biofilms associated with chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 24:373–383. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Percival SL, McCarty S, Hunt JA, Woods EJ. 2014. The effects of pH on wound healing, biofilms, and antimicrobial efficacy. Wound Repair Regen 22:174–186. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hoffman R, Noble J, Eagle M. 1999. The use of proteases as prognostic markers for the healing of venous leg ulcers. J Wound Care 8:273–276. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.6.25885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kwakman PHS, Van den Akker JPC, Guclu A, Aslami H, Binnekade JM, de Boer L, Boszhard L, Paulus F, Middelhoek P, te Velde AA, Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Schultz MJ, Zaat SAJ. 2008. Medical-grade honey kills antibiotic-resistant bacteria in vitro and eradicates skin colonization. Clin Infect Dis 46:1677–1682. doi: 10.1086/587892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Levy SB, Marshall B. 2004. Antibacterial resistance worldwide: causes, challenges and responses. Nat Med 10:S122–S129. doi: 10.1038/nm1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Akiyama H, Oono T, Saito M, Iwatsuki K. 2004. Assessment of cadexomer iodine against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vivo and in vitro using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dermatol 31:529–534. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00549.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lipsky BA, Hoey C. 2009. Topical antimicrobial therapy for treating chronic wounds. Clin Infect Dis 49:1541–1549. doi: 10.1086/644732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Duguid IG, Evans E, Brown MRW, Gilbert P. 1992. Growth-rate-independent killing by ciprofloxacin of biofilm-derived Staphylococcus epidermidis; evidence for cell-cycle dependency. J Antimicrob Chemother 30:791–802. doi: 10.1093/jac/30.6.791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Suci PA, Mittelman MW, Yu FP, Geesey GG. 1994. Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 38:2125–2133. doi: 10.1128/AAC.38.9.2125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hauser AR. 2013. Antibiotics that target DNA and replication, p 87–88. In Hauser AR. (ed), Antibiotic basics for clinicians: the ABCs of choosing the right antibacterial agent, 2nd ed Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Campion JJ, McNamara PJ, Evans ME. 2004. Evolution of ciprofloxacin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in in vitro pharmacokinetic environments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4733–4744. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4733-4744.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang G, Hindler JF, Ward KW, Bruckner DA. 2006. Increased vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from a university hospital during a 5-year period. J Clin Microbiol 44:3883–3886. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01388-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Anderl JN, Franklin MJ, Stewart PS. 2000. Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:1818–1824. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1818-1824.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lobritz MA, Belenky P, Porter CBM, Gutierrez A, Yang JH, Schwarz EG, Dwyer DJ, Khalil AS, Collins JJ. 2015. Antibiotic efficacy is linked to bacterial cellular respiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:8173–8180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509743112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Belenky P, Ye JD, Porter CBM, Cohen NR, Lobritz MA, Ferrante T, Jain S, Korry BJ, Schwarz EG, Walker GC, Collins JJ. 2015. Bactericidal antibiotics induce toxic metabolic perturbations that lead to cellular damage. Cell Rep 13:968–980. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bang LM, Buntting C, Molan P. 2003. The effect of dilution on the rate of hydrogen peroxide production in honey and its implications for wound healing. J Altern Complement Med 9:267–273. doi: 10.1089/10755530360623383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Molan PC. 2002. Re-introducing honey in the management of wounds and ulcers—theory and practice. Ostomy Wound Manage 48:28–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Block SS. 1983. Disinfection, sterilization, and preservation, 3rd ed Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Apostolov K. 1980. The effects of iodine on the biological activities of myxoviruses. J Hygiene 84:381–388. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400026905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.McDonnell G, Denver Russell A. 1999. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:147–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schreml S, Szeimies R-M, Karrer S, Heinlin J, Landthaler M, Babilas P. 2010. The impact of the pH value on skin integrity and cutaneous wound healing. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 24:373–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Thomas LV, Wimpenny JWT, Davis GJ. 1993. Effect of three preservatives on the growth of Bacillus cereus, Vero cytotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, on plates with gradients of pH and sodium chloride concentration. Int J Food Microbiol 17:289–301. doi: 10.1016/0168-1605(93)90199-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Valero A, Pérez-Rodríguez F, Carrasco E, Fuentes-Alventosa JM, García-Gimeno RM, Zurera G. 2009. Modelling the growth boundaries of Staphylococcus aureus: effect of temperature, pH and water activity. Int J Food Microbiol 133:186–194. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Banville RR. 1964. Factors affecting growth of Staphylococcus aureus l forms on semidefined medium. J Bacteriol 87:1192–1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Molan PC. 1999. The role of honey in the management of wounds. J Wound Care 8:415–418. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1999.8.8.25904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bogdanov S. 1997. Nature and origin of the antibacterial substances in honey. LWT-Food Sci Technol 30:748–753. doi: 10.1006/fstl.1997.0259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ahmed A, Khan RA, Azim MK, Saeed SA, Mesaik MA, Ahmed S, Imran I. 2011. Effect of natural honey on human platelets and blood coagulation proteins. Pak J Pharm Sci 24:389–397. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Leveen HH, Falk G, Borek B, Diaz C, Lynfield Y, Wynkoop BJ, Mabunda GA, Rubricius JL, Christoudias GC. 1973. Chemical acidification of wounds. An adjuvant to healing and the unfavorable action of alkalinity and ammonia. Ann Surg 178:745–753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nagoba BS, Suryawanshi NM, Wadher B, Selkar S. 2015. Acidic environment and wound healing: a review. Wounds 27:5–11. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Schneider LA, Korber A, Grabbe S, Dissemond J. 2007. Influence of pH on wound-healing: a new perspective for wound-therapy? Arch Dermatol Res 298:413–420. doi: 10.1007/s00403-006-0713-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Stewart PS, Raquepas JB. 1995. Implications of reaction-diffusion theory for the disinfection of microbial biofilms by reactive antimicrobial agents. Chem Eng Sci 50:3099–3104. doi: 10.1016/0009-2509(95)00143-S. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Thomas J, Linton S, Corum L, Slone W, Okel T, Percival SL. 2012. The affect [sic] of pH and bacterial phenotypic state on antibiotic efficacy. Int Wound J 9:428–435. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00902.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Hardy DJ, Hanson CW, Hensey DM, Beyer JM, Fernandes PB. 1988. Susceptibility of Campylobacter pylori to macrolides and fluoroquinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother 22:631–636. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.5.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kamberi M, Tsutsumi K, Kotegawa T, Kawano K, Nakamura K, Niki Y, Nakano S. 1999. Influences of urinary pH on ciprofloxacin pharmacokinetics in humans and antimicrobial activity in vitro versus those of sparfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:525–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Smith JT, Ratcliffe NT. 1986. Einfluss von pH-Wert und Magnesium auf die antibakterielle Aktivität von Chinolonpräparaten. Infection 14:S31–S35. doi: 10.1007/BF01645195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Aller SG, Yu J, Ward A, Weng Y, Chittaboina S, Zhuo R, Harrell PM, Trinh YT, Zhang Q, Urbatsch IL, Chang G. 2009. Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323:1718–1722. doi: 10.1126/science.1168750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bryan LE, Kowand SK, Van Den Elzen HM. 1979. Mechanism of aminoglycoside antibiotic resistance in anaerobic bacteria: Clostridium perfringens and Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 15:7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.1.7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Mascio CT, Alder JD, Silverman JA. 2007. Bactericidal action of daptomycin against stationary-phase and nondividing Staphylococcus aureus cells. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother 51:4255–4260. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00824-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tuomanen E, Cozens R, Tosch W, Zak O, Tomasz A. 1986. The rate of killing of Escherichia coli by beta-lactam antibiotics is strictly proportional to the rate of bacterial growth. J Gen Microbiol 132:1297–1304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Pankey GA, Sabath LD. 2004. Clinical relevance of bacteriostatic versus bactericidal mechanisms of action in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis 38:864–870. doi: 10.1086/381972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Miller CN, Carville K, Newall N, Kapp S, Lewin G, Karimi L, Santamaria N. 2011. Assessing bacterial burden in wounds: comparing clinical observation and wound swabs. Int Wound J 8:45–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00747.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Shi CM, Nakao H, Yamazaki M, Tsuboi R, Ogawa H. 2007. Mixture of sugar and povidone-iodine stimulates healing of MRSA-infected skin ulcers on db/db mice. Arch Dermatol Res 299:449–456. doi: 10.1007/s00403-007-0776-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Jull A, Walker N, Parag V, Molan P, Rodgers A, Honey as Adjuvant Leg Ulcer Therapy Trial Collaborators . 2008. Randomized clinical trial of honey-impregnated dressings for venous leg ulcers. Br J Surg 95:175–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kamaratos AV, Tzirogiannis KN, Iraklianou SA, Panoutsopoulos GI, Kanellos IE, Melidonis AI. 2014. Manuka honey-impregnated dressings in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 11:259–263. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01082.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.CLSI. 2012. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, 9th ed, vol 32 Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Lewandowski Z, Beyenal H. 2014. Fundamentals of biofilm research, 2nd ed CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN, Bird RB. 2002. Transport phenomena, 2nd ed John Wiley, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Perry RH. 1997. Perry's chemical engineer's handbook, 6th ed McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Chen C-Y, Nace GW, Irwin PL. 2003. A 6 × 6 drop plate method for simultaneous colony counting and MPN enumeration of Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli. J Microbiol Methods 55:475–479. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00194-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.





