Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 3;7:43181. doi: 10.1038/srep43181

Phthalocyanine Doped Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Platform for the detection of Dopamine

Ntsoaki G Mphuthi 1,2, Abolanle S Adekunle 1,2,3, Omolola E Fayemi 1,2, Lukman O Olasunkanmi 1,2,3, Eno E Ebenso 1,2,a
PMCID: PMC5335709  PMID: 28256521

Abstract

The electrocatalytic properties of metal oxides (MO = Fe3O4, ZnO) nanoparticles doped phthalocyanine (Pc) and functionalized MWCNTs, decorated on glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was investigated. Successful synthesis of the metal oxide nanoparticles and the MO/Pc/MWCNT composite were confirmed using UV-Vis, EDX, XRD and TEM techniques. Successful modification of GCE with the MO and their composite was also confirmed using cyclic voltammetry (CV) technique. GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc was the best electrode towards DA detection with very low detection limit (0.75 μM) which compared favourably with literature, good sensitivity (1.45 μA/μM), resistance to electrode fouling, and excellent ability to detect DA without interference from AA signal. Electrocatalytic oxidation of DA on GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrode was diffusion controlled but characterized with some adsorption of electro-oxidation reaction intermediates products. The fabricated sensors are easy to prepare, cost effective and can be applied for real sample analysis of dopamine in drug composition. The good electrocatalytic properties of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc were related to their (quantum chemically derived) frontier molecular orbital energies and global electronegativities. The better performance of 29H,31H-Pc than 2,3-Nc in aiding electrochemical oxidation of DA might be due to its better electron accepting ability, which is inferred from its lower ELUMO and higher χ.


Dopamine (DA) is a neurotransmitter in mammalian brain tissues that belongs to the family of inhibitory/catecholamine neurotransmitters. It plays an important physiological role in the functioning of central nervous, renal, hormonal and cardiovascular systems as an extra cellular chemical messenger, as well as in drug addiction. Its function is to regulate neural interactions by reducing the permeability of gap junctions between adjacent neurons of the same type1. Abnormal DA level may relate to many diseases, such as Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease, Alzheimer’s diseases and tardive dyskinesia2, where the dopaminergic activity is lower than in healthy individuals. The opposite is true in schizophrenia where the activity of the dopaminergic neurons is increased due to abnormalities in their regulation. Furthermore, the development of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa has also been associated with altered dopaminergic activities2,3,4. Therefore, it is important to rapidly and accurately measure DA concentrations in biological fluids for clinical diagnosis.

Although DA is an electrochemically active compound on some electrode surfaces, its electrochemical detection in biological fluids using bare electrode is often ineffective. This is mainly because of interfering species such as ascorbic acid (AA) and uric acid (UA)5. As a result, the accuracy of its detection is very low in real sample analysis. The basal concentration of DA is 0.01–1 μM, while the concentration of AA and UA is 100–1000 times higher than that of DA, hence it is crucial to develop sensitive and selective methods for determination of DA4. A great contribution to disease diagnosis would be a development of electrochemical sensor that would measure DA at low levels of characteristic of living system (26–40 nmol L−1)6,7.

There is currently an interest in the use of metal oxide NPs, metal-doped metal oxides, metal oxide-CNTs (carbon nanotubes) nanocomposites, and metal oxide-polymer composites8 in electrochemistry to improve the performance of electrochemical detection of biological and environmental analytes9. Analytical devices based on nanostructured metal oxides are cost-effective, highly sensitive due to the large surface-to-volume ratio of the nanostructure and additionally show excellent selectivity8. Metal (M) and metal oxides (MO) NPs have been used to modify electrodes for use as electrocatalysts and biosensors; hence they play an important role in diagnostic devices10. Shan et al.11 investigated Fe3O4/chitosan modified electrode as a feasible sensor for detection of H2O2. He found that there was limited interference, prompt response, good reproducibility and the electrode showed long term stability. In addition, Adekunle et al.12 conducted a study on the voltammetric detection of DA using easily prepared nano-scaled iron oxide (Fe2O3) catalyst supported on MWCNTs modified pyrolytic graphite electrode. Furthermore, Fang5 also studied the voltammetric sensing of DA using Fe3O4 NPs modified gold electrode. The modified electrode gave promoting effect and high stability toward the electrochemical oxidation of DA. Chen et al.13 suggested that combining good conductivity of ZnO NPs and remarkable properties of CNTs; it could result in potential applications of semiconducting CNTs as novel photocatalysts. Aravind et al.14 mentioned that because of the great surface area, high electrocatalytic activity, excellent electron transfer rate of CNTs, strong adsorption ability and fast electron transfer kinetics of ZnO, a biosensor was fabricated using ZnO NP-decorated MWCNTs and tested for the selective detection of DA. ZnO NPs have a wide range of use and applications in industrial purposes, solar cells UV light-emitting devices, gas sensors, photocatalysts, pharmaceutical and cosmetic15.

Phthalocyanines (Pcs) and their derivatives are well-known blue-green organic semiconductor materials that belong to the family of aromatic heterocyclic conjugated molecules, with alternating single-double bond structures16. They are made of delocalised π-electrons system17, where π-electron delocalisation and interactions with central mental atom on metal phthalocyanines (MPcs) determine the redox properties18. Their thermal and chemical stability are important properties that make them molecules to be incorporated into electrochemical sensors. Furthermore the possibility of incorporating about 70 different metal atoms into their ring19, and also being able to have variation of the substituents in the side chain, can allow production of peculiar and optimized thin films having different degrees of sensitivity, selectivity and stability20. Wang21 reported that among the metal substituted Pc, lead-Pc is the most interesting one in terms of reproducibility, fast response recovery and excellent gas sensitivity. Pcs are capable of binding non-specifically with various analytes through van der Waal forces, hydrogen bonding, and coordination interactions with the central metal22. However non-fictionalized Pcs have a low surface-to-volume ratio, thus the majority of the active sensing components are embedded in the bulk, which inevitably limits the efficiency and sensitivity23. Furthermore, Pcs have been widely studied for functionalization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) because they play important roles in enhancement of the performance of CNTs-based devices; they demonstrate attractive electronic and photoelectronic properties21,24. Recent reports show that MPc-CNTs hybrids exhibit enhanced electrochemical responses when compared to the use of CNTs or MPc alone25.

There are some reported studies on Pc modified electrodes for detection of DA26,27,28,29,30. For example, Martin et al.26 reported electrodeposited film of iron phthalocyanine (FePc) on glassy carbon and tin oxide electrodes for DA probing. Shaidarova et al.27 has reported determination of dopamine using electrode modified by a polyaniline film with an inclusion of copper (II) tetrasulfophthalocyanine. The nanocomposite modified electrode made possible the detection limit of DA to be 1 × 10−8 M. Naik et al.29 worked on surfactant induced iron (II) phthalocyanine modified carbon paste electrode for simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. The modified electrode resolved the overlapped voltammetric responses of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid in to three well-defined cyclic voltammetric peaks. These studies have employed metal nanoparticles (Cu, Ni, Co, or Fe) to doped Pc. However in this work, metal oxide nanoparticles (ZnO and Fe3O4) are used because: (a) there is paucity of literature on the use of MO doped Pc for DA detection, (b) synthesis route for MO nanoparticles are shorter and cheaper compared with their metal nanoparticles counterparts, (c) devices based on metal oxides nanostructures are cost-effective, highly sensitive due to the large surface-to-volume ratio of the nanostructure and additionally show excellent selectivity8 and this is of paramount importance to the present study because of interferences from other molecules (d) the need to explore the electron transfer mechanism of MO modified electrodes which is also fundamental to their application in sensors12, (e) study in our group have shown that MWCNT-Fe2O3 modified electrode gave excellent separation of DA signal from AA even at AA concentration 1000 times that of DA12, (f) the detection of many analytes at trace concentration using MO modified electrodes have been reported12,31.

In this work, electrocatalytic behaviour of ZnO and Fe3O4 nanoparticles doped phthalocyanines (Pc) and MWCNT on glassy carbon electrode (GCE) towards dopamine (DA) oxidation was investigated. Electrocatalytic oxidation of the analytes was successful on the modified electrodes, GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H, 31H-Pc was the best electrodes towards DA detection with very low detection limit that compared with literature, good sensitivity, resistance to electrode fouling, and excellent ability to detect DA without interference from AA signal. The sensor is easy to fabricate, cost effective and could be used for routine determination of dopamine in biological matrices. Electrocatalytic activities of the modified electrodes were linked with some molecular quantum chemical descriptors especially the frontier molecular orbitals and associated parameters.

Experimental

Materials and Reagents

Glassy carbon electrode (3 mm diameter) was purchased from CH Instrument USA. Polishing pads were obtained from Buehler, IL, USA and Alumina micro powder (1.0, 0.3 and 0.05 μm alumina slurries) was used for polishing the glassy carbon electrode (GCE). Pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes (95% purity, 10–20 nm); Iron(III) chloride (FeCl3), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2 · 6H2O), 29H,31H-Phthalocyanine (29H,31H-Pc), 2,3-Naphthalocyanine (2,3-Nc), dopamine hydrochloride, ascorbic acid and other reagents are of analytical grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, Merck chemicals and LABCHEM respectively. Ultra-pure water of resistivity 18.2 MΩ was obtained from a Milli-Q Water System (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA) and was used throughout for the preparation of solutions. A phosphate buffer solution (PBS) of 7.0 was prepared with appropriate amounts of NaH2PO4 · 2H2O, Na2HPO4 · 2H2O, and H3PO4, and adjusted with 0.1 M H3PO4 or NaOH. Prepared solutions were purged with pure nitrogen to eliminate oxygen and prevent any form of external oxidation during every electrochemical experiment.

Synthesis of Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Nanoparticles

Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was dissolved in deionised water to a concentration of 1.0 M and the resulting solution was heated, under constant stirring, to the temperature of 70 °C. After achieving this temperature, a solution of 0.5 M Zn(NO3)2 · 6H2O was added slowly (drop wise for 60 minutes) into the NaOH aqueous solution under continuous stirring. In this procedure the reaction temperature was constantly maintained at 70 °C. The suspension formed with the dropping of 0.5 M Zn(NO3)26H2O solution to the alkaline aqueous solution was kept stirred for two hours at 70 °C. The material formed was filtered and washed several times with deionised water. The washed sample was dried at 65 °C in the oven for 24 hours to obtain the dry powder32.

Synthesis of Iron Oxide (Fe3O4) Nanoparticles

A mixture of FeCl3 stock solutions (30 mL) 2.0 M, Na2SO3 stock solution (20 mL) 1.0 M and concentrated ammonia (50.8 mL), diluted to a total volume of 800 mL was used. Fe3+ and SO32− were mixed; the colour of the solution changed from light yellow to red, indicating formation of a complex ion. The solution was quickly poured into the diluted ammonia solution under vigorous stirring, and the colour changed from red to yellow again. A black precipitate was formed and stirring continued for 30 minutes. After the reaction, the beaker containing the suspension was placed on a permanent magnet. The supernatant liquid was decanted and fresh deionised water was added into the beaker. This procedure was repeated several times until most of the ions in the suspensions were removed. The dry powder was obtained by filtration and drying at room temperature33.

Preparation of MWCNT/Metal Oxide/Phthalocyanine Hybrids

Fe3O4 nanoparticles (2.5 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL DMF along with 2.0 mg of either of phthalocyanine 2,3-Nc or 29H,31H-Pc. The solution was allowed to mix with the aid of ultrasonication for 1 h. 2.0 mg of MWCNTs was dispersed in the DMF solution containing 2.5 mg of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and 2.0 mg of phthalocyanine under ultrasonication. The Fe3O4/phthalocyanine hybrids were allowed to adsorb onto MWCNTs by spontaneous adsorption and sonication for 5 h to give MWCNT/Fe3O4/phthalocyanine hybrids. MWCNT/ZnO/phthalocyanine hybrids were prepared using the same procedure.

Equipment and Procedure

The Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis was performed using Tecnai G2 Spirit FEI (USA). UV-vis analyses were carried out using UV-visible spectrophotometer (Agilent Technology, Cary series UV-vis spectrometer, USA). Electrochemical experiments were carried out using an Autolab Potentiostat PGSTAT 302 (Eco Chemie, Utrecht, and The Netherlands) driven by the GPES software version 4.9. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were performed with Autolab Frequency Response Analyser (FRA) software between 10 kHz and 1 Hz using a 5 mV rms sinusoidal modulation with the solution of the analyte at their respective peak potential of oxidation (vs. Ag|AgCl in sat’d KCl). A Ag|AgCl in saturated KCl and platinum wire were used as reference and counter electrodes respectively. A bench top Crison pH meter, Basic 20+ model, was used for pH measurements. All experiments were performed at 25 ± 1 °C while the solutions were de-aerated before every electrochemical experiment.

Electrode Modification Procedure

Electrode modification was carried out using the drop-dry method. The glassy carbon electrode was cleaned by gentle polishing in aqueous slurry of alumina nanopowder on a silicon carbide-emery paper followed by a mirror finish on a Buehler felt pad. The electrode was further sonicated in double distilled water, and then absolute ethanol for 2 min to remove residual alumina particles that were trapped on the surface and dried at room temperature. Separate suspensions of metal oxide (MO) nanoparticles, phthalocyanines (Pc), MWCNT and MWCNT/MO/Pc hybrids were prepared in 1 mL of DMF and sonicated as described above. 10 μL drops of the prepared suspensions were dropped on the bare GCE and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 5 min to obtain GCE-MWCNT, GCE-ZnO and GCE-Fe3O4, GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrodes.

Preparation of the Dopamine Hydrochloride Injection Solution

2 mL of the drug (dopamine hydrochloride injection- Dopamine HCl-Fresenius®) sample was diluted to 100 mL with distilled de-ionized water. 2 mL of the diluted solution was pipette into six 50 mL volumetric flask and all except one were spiked with different concentration of standard dopamine solution, and made to volume with phosphate buffer pH 7.0. The concentration of each test aliquot solution was determined using square wave voltammetry. Two different injections from the same batch were analysed using the same procedure. The experiment was repeated 3 times for each sample.

Results and Discussion

UV-Vis, EDX, XRD and TEM Characterization

UV-Vis Results

Figure 1 shows the comparative UV-Vis absorption spectra for the metal oxide (MO) nanoparticles/phthalocyanines hybrids in DMF solution, confirming the formation of Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, ZnO/2,3-Nc and ZnO/29H,31H-Pc composites. Phthalocyanines are organic semiconductors with important electrical properties applicable to sensor system. The UV-Vis spectrum of phthalocyanines originates from molecular orbitals within the aromatic 18π electron system34 and they have been considered as electrophotographic materials due to their absorption ability in the ultraviolet and visible region35. The evidence for the successful doping of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc with Fe3O4 and ZnO is demonstrated by the change in the absorption bands as shown in the Figure. For example, Fe3O4 and ZnO nanoparticles showed absorption peaks at 397 nm and 370 nm (B band) respectively in the region of the visible spectrum which are in the range of 300 to 400 nm for transition metal oxide as reported in literature36,37. However after the phthalocyanine were doped with the nanoparticles there was a blue shift (386 nm) in absorption peak confirming formation of Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc composite.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

UV-Vis spectra of (a) Fe3O4, Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc and (b) ZnO, ZnO/2,3-Nc, ZnO/29H,31H-Pc in DMF solution.

Appearance of a new peak at 665 nm and a red shift in absorbance peak at 376 nm (B-band) confirmed the formation of ZnO/29H,31H-Pc composite. Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and ZnO/2,3-Nc showed absorptions peaks at 369 nm and 362 nm respectively, which are lower compared with 397 nm and 370 nm for Fe3O4 and ZnO nanoparticles alone further confirming the successful formation of Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and ZnO/2,3-Nc composite. Broad absorption band for these two composites were also observed at 725 nm and 730 nm (Q-band) respectively. These characterized peaks of the Q-band have generally been interpreted in terms of the π-π* transitions of the π-electron on the phthalocyanine macrocycle38,39. Since phthalocyanines are found to be relatively good electron donors, Spadavecchia40 mentioned that the dispersion forces between adjacent molecules of phthalocyanine are produced by the delocalized π-electron system constructing a highly polarizable electronic cloud. As a result, low ionization energy favours the charge transfer interactions when electron acceptor molecules are adsorbed, hence the difference in the absorption spectra come from an increase of the density in the electronic levels available for π-π* transition. These electron cloud and charge transfer behaviour of Pc could also be responsible for the successful formation of the different MO/Pc composite synthesized in this study probably due to ionic and intermolecular interaction between the MO nanoparticles and the Pc molecules.

EDX and XRD Results

The EDX spectra shown in Fig. 2 indicate the elemental composition of hybrids formed when phthalocyanines doped with metal oxides (Fe3O4, ZnO) were supported on MWCNTs. The presence of MWCNTs is confirmed by a carbon and sulfur, since the MWCNTs were purified and functionalized by acid mixture. The appearance of sulfur is due to sulfuric acid used during functionalization of MWCNTs. The presence of phthalocyanines is confirmed by a small peak of nitrogen while the zinc, oxygen and iron peaks further confirms the successful doping of Fe3O4 and ZnO. These results illustrates that MWCNTs was successfully modified with metal oxides doped phthalocyanine.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

EDX spectra of (a) MWCNT/ZnO/Pc (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/Pc.

Figure 3(a) shows the XRD pattern of Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Five characteristic peaks for Fe3O4 occurred at 2θ of 30.01°, 35.6°, 43.27°, 57.02° and 62.76°. These peaks are in accordance with those reported in literature for pure Fe3O4 nanoparticles37,41. The corresponding indices of these diffraction peaks according to literature were (220), (311), (400), (511) and (440) for 30.01°, 35.6°, 43.27°, 57.02° and 62.76° respectively41,42,43. The average crystallite size obtained was 23.8 nm which was comparable to that obtained from TEM analysis. The diffraction peak at 2θ of 35.6° corresponds to the spinel phase of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the broadening of the diffracting bands indicates small particle size and ultrafine nanoparticles37,43. These data was in agreement with the XRD patterns of Fe3O4 nanoparticles reported in literature, therefore it confirms that the synthesized nanoparticles were pure Fe3O4 nanoparticles with spinel structure41,44.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) Fe3O4 (b) ZnO (c) functionalized and pristine MWCNTs.

Figure 3(b) illustrates the XRD pattern of ZnO nanoparticles. The diffraction peaks were obtained at 2θ of 31.77°, 34.52°, 36.29°, 47.49°, 56.65°, 62.88°, 66.14°, 67.93° and 69.11°, with corresponding indices of (100), (002), (101), (102), (110), (103), (200), (112) and (201) respectively45,46. The three sharp and intense diffraction peaks at 2θ of 31.77°, 34.52° and 36.29° indicates high crystallinity and the nanoparticles have polycrystalline structure47. Furthermore there were no observed peaks of any impurities indicating that nanoparticles synthesized were pure ZnO48.

According to literature the peaks for (100), (002) and (101) indices illustrates hexagonal ZnO of wurtzite structure46,48,49. The average crystallite size obtained was 14.2 nm which was comparable to that obtained from TEM analysis. Figure 3(c) shows the XRD pattern of functionalised and pristine MWCNTs. The three diffraction peaks observed at pristine MWCNTs also appeared at functionalized MWCNTs with enhanced intensity, indicating that MWCNTs were successfully functionalized with carboxyl groups, and also the MWCNTs structure was not destroyed. The diffraction peaks occurred at 2θ of 26.12°, 43.62° and 52.49° which corresponds to indices of (002), (100) and (101) respectively as reported in literature13,50. The broad peak (002) in the XRD pattern indicates the graphitic structure of CNTs51 which is the ordered arrangement of the concentric cylinders of graphitic carbon52. Therefore this confirmed the hexagonal structure of MWCNTs50.

TEM Characterization

The morphology and microstructures of prepared compounds and their composites were characterized using TEM. Figure 4 shows the TEM images of (a) Fe3O4 NPs, (b) ZnO NPs, (c) 2,3-Nc, (d) 29H,31H-Pc, and (e) MWCNT; while Fig. 5 shows the TEM images of (a) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc, (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, (c) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc and (d) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc. The TEM images showed that Fe3O4 NPs were similar in shape, approximately spherical and they appeared to be almost uniformly distributed and less aggregated with the average diameter of 12 nm. The particle size was found to range from 6–23.7 nm. ZnO NPs were shaped like small rods and were aggregated with an average diameter of 26.1 nm. The aggregation might be due to the large surface area and high surface energy of ZnO NPs, which probably took place during the drying process53. The length size of the nanorods ranged from 20–78.6 nm. 2,3-Nc (c) and 29H,31H-Pc (d) images showed an irregularly shaped, small rod-like structures, or clustered flakes, none-uniform in both size and shape with a rough surface of 2,3-Nc (c) and a smooth surface of 29H,31H-Pc (d). The TEM image of MWCNTs (e) showed a tangled-net like structure of long tubes with a rather smooth surface. The presence of dark round spots show the cap ends of the tubes that were cut opened by acid treatment; they result from the oxidation of C-O, O–H and C–O groups to form COOH groups on the end caps of the CNTs. The MWCNTs showed a diameter of 8.95 nm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

TEM images of (a) Fe3O4 NPs, (b) ZnO NPs, (c) 2,3-Nc, (d) 29H,31H-Pc, (e) MWCNT.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

TEM images of (a) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc, (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc (c) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc and (d) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc.

The TEM images of MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc (Fig. 5a) and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc (Fig. 5c) showed that ZnO nanoparticles and phthalocyanines combined into larger aggregates that were scattered and poorly dispersed on the MWCNTs for MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc surface (Fig. 5a), and smaller particles were found distributed along the tubes for MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc (Fig. 5c) but with tube diameters of 11.59 nm and 8.31 nm in both cases respectively as shown in inserted images. On the other hand the TEM images of (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and (d) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc showed that Fe3O4 nanoparticles and phthalocyanine appeared to be almost uniformly dispersed that most of the nanoparticles were attached on the sidewalls of the MWCNTs. It can also be observed that the aggregation of Fe3O4 nanoparticles was minimal. The diameter of the tubes was 9.34 nm and 14.83 nm for (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and (d) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc respectively.

Electrochemical Characterization of Modified Electrodes

Characterization of the modified electrodes was carried out in pH 7.2 PBS and 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox probe (scan rate 25 mV s−1) using cyclic voltammetry to determine their electron transport properties. Figures 6 and 7 illustrate comparative current response results obtained with the bare and modified electrodes. From Fig. 6, an enhanced current response for the GCE modified with 2,3-Nc, MWCNT, MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc in [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− was observed as compared to the redox reaction on bare GCE and GCE modified with 29H,31H-Pc which showed a very small current response. Similar results were obtained on Fig. 7 when GCE was modified with 2,3-Nc, MWCNT, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc, high current response was observed as compared to bare GCE and 29H,31H-Pc modified electrode. The GCE modified with ZnO and Fe3O4 NPs alone showed a drastic decrease in current response, this could be due to the formation of passive oxide layers of ZnO and Fe3O4 NPs, which were obstructive to the electron transfer activity54. Pairs of well-defined redox peaks were observed at I (0.2858 V), II (0.2174 V) and I (0.2834 V), II (0.2199 V) for Fig. 6a,c respectively. Similar pairs of redox peaks were observed in about the same redox potentials in Fig. 7(a,c). These redox peaks represent the [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox process. Two additional peaks were discovered at II (0.8009 V) and III (0.05386 V) (Fig. 6c), these peaks might be associated with the oxidation of the Fe (II) to Fe (III) in Fe3O4 and reduction of Fe (III) to Fe (0). Similarly, two additional anodic peaks were detected on Fig. 7(a,c) at II (0.8864 V) and II (0.8766 V) respectively, which might be due to the electrochemical oxidation Zn (II) to Zn (III). These two peaks showed a high oxidation current that almost suppressed the anodic oxidation peak of [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox process. Figure 6(e,f) shows linear sweep voltammograms of GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc respectively which substantiates the redox behavior of the electrodes.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparative cyclic voltammetry evolutions of GCE and Fe3O4 NPs modified electrodes in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− (a,c), and in pH 7.2 PBS (b,d). Linear sweep voltammograms of (e) GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and (f) GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Cyclic voltammetry evolutions of GCE and ZnO NPs modified electrodes in 5 mM [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− (a,c), and in pH 7.2 PBS (b,d).

Similarly, the GCE modified with MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O429H,31H-Pc (Fig. 6b,d) and MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc (Fig. 7b,d) in PBS electrolyte showed higher current response as compared with other modified electrodes. The oxidation peaks of Fe3O4 appeared for MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc at I (0.2614 V) (Fig. 6b); and for MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc at I (0.2600 V), II (0.30 V) and III (0.8009 V) (Fig. 6d). The peaks at around 0.26 and 0.3 correspond to the oxidation of Fe (II) to Fe (III), while the one around 0.8 V can be attributed to the oxidation of Fe (III) to FeOOH. Similar oxidation peaks were observed around 0.8–0.9 V (Fig. 7b,d) for ZnO oxidation. Zang55 mentioned that the electrochemical redox reaction of regular structured ZnO in batteries is not reversible and suggested that the reversibility of the redox reaction observed in PBS electrolyte might be attributed to the unique nanostructure of ZnO NPs fabricated. It is evident from the results in both electrolytes that there is combining cooperative effect between MO, Pc/Nc, and MWCNT that leads to enhance electron transport and high current response of the nanocomposite modified electrodes. This can mainly be due to the great surface area of MWCNT and Pc, and electrical conductivity of the MO and MWCNT NPs.

Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Studies of Modified Electrodes

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy is a useful technique to investigate the electrode/solution interface properties. Figure 8 shows the Nyquist plots of the bare and modified electrodes in [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox probe at a fixed potential of 0.22 V (vs Ag/AgCl, Sat’d KCl). The EIS data was recorded in the frequency range between 1 Hz to 10 kHz and the impedance parameters obtained are summarized in Table 1. Figure 8(e) represents the circuit used in the EIS fitting and it consists of solution resistance (Rs), constant phase element (CPE) which relates to the porous nature of the electrode, charge transfer resistance (Rct) and double layer capacitance (Cdl). The chi-square values, which are used to judge the goodness of EIS fittings and appropriateness of the adopted equivalent circuit and the percentage errors (in parentheses) associated with each circuit parameter are also listed in Table 1. The small chi-square values and percentage errors (Table 1) indicate that the experimental data are well fitted by the equivalent circuit. From the results obtained GCE-Fe3O4 and GCE-ZnO in Fig. 8 showed a semicircle domain. According to literature such behaviour demonstrates a charge transfer limited process52 and the diameter of the semicircle is equal to the charge transfer resistance56. Referring to impedance data in Table 1, the EIS of ZnO modified electrode showed a very large electron transfer resistance, this indicates that ZnO film was obstructive to the transfer of electrons of [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox probe57, the same applied to Fe3O4. However MWCNT, MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes showed a very low charge transfer resistance, indicating that there was an electron conduction pathway formed between the composites and the electrolyte. These electrodes showed a linear plot which corresponds to the mass diffusion limited process58. Regarding the composites, the low charge transfer resistance might be due to the conductive nature of MWCNTs and atomic size (nano size) of the metals attached to the phthalocyanine and naphthalocyanine which accounts for the different rates of charge transfer and the other factor might be attributed to the axial ligands and substituents on the ring59. Therefore the oxidation of metal phthalocyanines may occur both at the metal and at the ring depending on the energies and proximity of the metal d and phthalocyanine ring orbitals60. These results are in good agreement with results obtained during CV studies.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Typical Nyquist plots obtained for the bare and modified electrodes (ad) in [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox probe at fixed potential 0.22 V (vs Ag/AgCl, sat’d KCl). (e) Represents the circuit used in the fitting of the EIS data in (ad).

Table 1. Impedance data obtained for bare and modified electrodes in [Fe(CN)6]4−/[Fe(CN)6]3− redox probe at fixed potential 0.22 V (vs Ag/AgCl, sat’d KCl).
Fabricated Electrodes Impedance parameters
Rs (Ω cm2) Rct (Ω cm2) Cdl (μF) CPE Chi-square
BARE 54.3 (8.332) 1211 (2.547) 4.46 (2.66) 0.533E-3 (7.029) 0.09217
Fe3O4 28.06 (32.709) 981 (5.612) 2.06 (7.026) 0.31E-3 (3.391) 0.369
ZnO 83.5 (2.521) 3890 (5.747) 3.61 (6.365) 0.276E-4 (3.342) 0.06135
2,3-Nc 57.3 (20.32) 85.5 (14.5) 70.0 (29.00) 0.63E-3 (0.702) 0.00497
29H,31H-Pc 29.95 (33.77) 178.6 (4.411) 1.177 (5.905) 0.869E-3 (1.876) 0.04612
MWCNT 24.56 (15.976) 33.1 (11.367) 0.325 (24.346) 0.409E-2 (3.346) 0.0427
MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc 38.8 (0.00) 39.1 (3.851) 1000 (0.00) 0.258E-2 (24.7) 0.202
MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc 78.8 (3.663) 53.4 (13.503) 126.0 (13.347) 0.263E-2 (5.558) 0.0851
MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc 53.9 (5.285) 35.2 (12.997) 142.6 (9.474) 0.144E-2 (6.770) 0.1321
MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc 41.1 (6.33) 78.7 (6.923) 30.988 (7.729) 0.7112E-3 (4.191) 0.117

The values in brackets represent the percentage errors of the data fitting.

Electrocatalytic and Electroanalysis Studies

Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Dopamine (DA)

A series of CV experiments were conducted to investigate the electrocatalytic oxidation of DA in pH 7.2 PBS solution containing 0.085 mM of DA using the bare GCE and modified electrodes. Figure 9 presents the oxidation potentials and the comparative current response of the GCE electrode modified with Fe3O4 nanoparticles in the analyte. Except for Fig. 9(a), other figures present the voltammograms for the DA oxidation process after the background current subtraction. The voltammetric parameters such as Ipa and Epa are summarized in Table 2. From the results obtained, broad ill-defined oxidation peaks of DA were observed for bare GCE, GCE-ZnO, and GCE-29H,31H-Pc. It is also interesting to note that the GCE-Fe3O4, GCE-ZnO and GCE-29H,31H-Pc gave low current response compared with the bare GCE. This may suggest that the Fe3O4 and ZnO nanoparticles film acted as passive layer obstructing the flow of current due to DA oxidation. However, an enhanced DA oxidation current response at lower oxidation potential was observed at the GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, and GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc electrode (Fig. 9, Table 2). Similar trend was obtained for the ZnO nanoparticles GCE modified electrode where GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrodes gave the highest DA current at lower DA oxidation potential compared with the bare and GCE-MWCNT electrodes (Fig. 9, Table 2). The current was found to be 10 times higher for GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc and GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc than the bare electrode. Similarly, the current was approximately 15 and 12 times higher at GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc electrodes than the bare electrode. These developed GCE-MWCNT/MO/Pc sensors have demonstrated qualities of good electrochemical sensors because of (i) high current response and (ii) lower energy. The enhanced electrocatalysis of DA at the GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, GCE-MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrodes indicates that the tri-composite of MO NPs, MWCNT and Pc promotes flow of electrons during DA oxidation as compared to MWCNT, MOs or Nc/Pc alone. Similar enhanced current response results have been obtained and reported in literature for modified electrodes5,12,14,26,27,28,29,30,61. The enhanced DA oxidation current at the MWCNT/MO/Pc modified electrodes can also be likened to other factors mentioned in literature such as the ease of diffusion of the DA through the porous-like MWCNT, MO61,62 and Pc film to the catalytic sites of the electrode, affinity between Fe3+ and DA63, the larger available surface area of the modified electrode due to the nanometric dimension of the nanotubes and, finally the strong combination tendency of the electron-rich oxygen atom of ZnO and Fe3O4 in MWCNT/MO/Pc film to DA by electrostatic interaction since DA is positively charged in neutral environment64 due to the protonation of the nitrogen atom on the molecule. Therefore further studies in this work were carried out using MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrodes.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Cyclic voltammograms of bare GCE and GCE modified electrodes in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA (scan rate, 25mVs−1): (a) before background current subtraction, and (be) (after background current subtraction).

Table 2. Cyclic voltammetric parameters obtained for bare and modified electrodes in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA at scan rate 25 mV s−1.
Fabricated GC electrodes Cyclic voltammetric parameter
Ipa (μA) Epa (V)
BARE 1.94 0.256
Fe3O4 1.47 0.196
ZnO 0.21 0.173
2,3-Nc 2.3 0.192
29H,31H-Pc 1.53 0.266
MWCNT 14.4 0.176
MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc 29 0.201
MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc 20 0.186
MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc 23.7 0.168
MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc 19.8 0.174

Stability Studies

The stability of the fabricated sensors towards DA determination was investigated at 20 repeated CV scans in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA at scan rate of 25 mV s−1 as shown in Fig. 10. The stability was investigated using MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes. From the repeated scans, it was found that the peak current of the first cycle was more than the peak current of the second cycle and after the third cycle there was no significant drop in current response. This behavior was observed with all the four modified electrodes. Therefore the percentage current drop obtained was 5.65%, 5.88%, 5.56% and 5.26% for MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes respectively. Thus, the anodic and cathodic peak currents (I and II) remained almost stable, indicating good electrodes stability during repeated cycles. These results suggest that there is some level of adsorption of DA at electrodes surface65. The adsorptive nature of electrodes might be due to the porous structured film of the CNTs on the electrodes65. The relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) of the fabricated sensors response to DA was 7.32%, 5.9%, 3.4% and 6.2% for MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes respectively, indicating that these electrodes are relatively stable and are not subjected to obvious surface fouling towards DA determination. The second reduction peak (II) was observed in Fig. 10(d), this peak might be attributed to the reduction of ZnOOH to Zn(OH)2 and ZnO respectively. GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc showed a broad oxidation peak of DA as compared to other electrodes, however it gave the lowest RSD value indicating that it was the better performing and most stable electrode. The electrode can be used for the analysis of DA after storage in a refrigerator for up to two weeks without a significant change in its response.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Current response (20 scans) of (a) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, (c) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and (d) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrodes in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA at scan rate of 25 mV s−1.

The effect of scan rate (ν)

Cyclic voltammetry was used to study the scan rate (ν) effect (range 25–1000 mV s−1) at a constant concentration of DA (0.085 mM) with electrodes modified with MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc as shown in Figs 11 and 12. The plots of peak current vs square root of scan rate showed a linear relationship. The oxidation peak currents were simultaneously increasing with increasing scan rate suggesting diffusion controlled process. Similarly, the anodic peak current (Ipa) was directly proportional to the square root of scan rate (ν1/2) (Figs 11 and 12) but with negative intercept suggesting possibility of some adsorption intermediate in the process65. GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc (Fig. 12a), GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc (Fig. 12c) detect the presence of DA up to 300 mV s−1, from 350–1000 mV s−1 the oxidation peak current of DA became invisible. This might be due to electrode fouling effect. It could also suggest that the catalyst film on the electrode surface gets saturated and hence cannot detect the analyte over multiple cycles. Similar phenomenon have been observed by other workers and was attributed to factors such as method of electrode preparation, electrode conformation, the catalyst-analyte interaction, and porosity which play a significant role in the adsorption of the analyte on the catalyst film65.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Cyclic voltammograms of modified electrodes: (a) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA at scan rate of 25–1000 mV s−1. (c,d) Are their respective plots of peak current vs. square root of scan rate.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Cyclic voltammograms of modified electrodes: (a) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc (b) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc in pH 7.2 PBS containing 0.085 mM of DA at scan rate of 25–1000 mV s−1. (c,d) Are their respective plots of peak current vs. square root of scan rate.

The surface coverage (Γ) of DA on the surface of the modified electrode was calculated from the plot of peak current, Ip versus the square root of scan rate using Laviron equation66:

graphic file with name srep43181-m1.jpg

where Ip is the peak current in A, n is the number of electrons transferred, F is the Faraday constant (96 485. 3365 C mol−1), ν is the scan rate in Vs−1, A is the area of the electrode in cm2, Γ is the surface coverage of the analyte (mol cm−2), R is the ideal gas constant (8.3144621 J K−1 mol−1) and T is the temperature in K66. Assuming that n ≈ 262, the calculated surface coverage of DA on electrodes modified with MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc were 1.462 × 10−8 mol cm−2, 1.34 × 10−8 mol cm−2, 1.054 × 10−8 mol cm−2 and 1.492 × 10−8 mol cm−2 respectively. Although it was deduced that the reaction process is diffusion controlled with some level of adsorption, it can be inferred that the analyte diffused significantly from the bulk solution to the electrode surface based on the values of DA surface coverage obtained.

The plots of peak potential (Ep) versus the log of scan rate (log ν) (not shown) gave the Tafel values using the Tafel equation (Eq. 2)67,68:

graphic file with name srep43181-m2.jpg

where b is the Tafel value, k is a constant. The Tafel values obtained for MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes were 811.6 mV dec−1, 631.2 mV dec−1, 137.8 mV dec−1, 259.6 mV dec−1 respectively. The high Tafel values could be due to electrode porosity, which lead to the adsorption of reactants or intermediates on the electrode surface68. In addition the data obtained from plots of peak potential (Ep) versus the log of scan rate (log ν) showed a shift or an increase of peak potential as the log of scan rate increases. This variation of peak potential indicated that DA was oxidized by means of an adsorption process and the process was irreversible69.

Concentration study

It is known that oxidation current depends on the concentration of the analyte, therefore because of the advantage of its good sensitivity, DPV was used to study the effect of concentration of DA oxidation on MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes. The experiment was carried out in pH 7.2 PBS containing different concentrations of DA ranging from 3.27–24.3 μM. The results showed that the oxidation currents of DA at the surface of the modified electrodes were increasing with DA concentration. The linear variation of peak current with concentration is shown in Figs 13 and 14.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Differential pulse voltammograms of (a) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and (c) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes in pH 7.2 PBS containing different concentrations of DA (3.27, 6.3, 9.11, 11.7, 14.2, 16.5, 18.6, 20.6, 22.5 and 24.3 μM). (b,d) Are their respective plots of peak current vs. DA concentration.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

Differential pulse voltammograms of (a) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and (c) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes in pH 7.2 PBS containing different concentrations of DA (3.27, 6.3, 9.11, 11.7, 14.2, 16.5, 18.6, 20.6, 22.5 and 24.3 μM). (b,d) Are their respective plots of peak current vs. DA concentration.

The limit of detection (LOD) of the modified electrodes was calculated using Inline graphic70 where s is the relative standard deviation of the intercept, m is the slope of the linear current versus the concentration of the analyte. The obtained detection limits were, 1.77, 1.35, 2.34 and 0.75 μM for MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes respectively.

The limit of detection obtained in this work compared favourably with others reported in literature12,27,52,59,61. From the results obtained it can be seen that MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrode gave a low limit of detection with low sensitivity of 1.26 μA/μM as compared to the high sensitivity of MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc (1.35 μA/μM) and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc (1.45 μA/μM) modified electrodes. However, it has been reported that the limit of detection does not only depend on the sensitivity of a sensor. Fialkov et al.71 mentioned that sensitivity has often been mistakenly referred to as the ability to achieve low limits of detection, meaning that the more sensitive an electrode is, the low limit of detection can be achieved. He defined sensitivity as the change in signal versus the change in concentration of the analyte, or it can be defined as the slope of the calibration curve in an analysis. The sensitivity of a sensor depends widely on the reactive surface area of a sensor and the catalytic material used to modify an electrode72. In fabrication of a sensor, a limit of detection is more important to investigate the performance of a sensor. A sensor with a high sensitivity won’t necessarily equate to a low limit of detection, meaning a highly sensitive sensor may have a high background noise level which might not be a problem at higher concentrations, but at lower concentrations excessive noise can hinder the good measurements of detection limits72. Therefore other than increasing sensitivity, a low detection limit can be achieved by reducing matrix interference (increasing selectivity) and high background noise71.

Interference Study

DA coexists with other molecules in our biological fluids. AA is an electroactive species known to interfere in DA analysis in biological fluids. The basal concentration of DA is 0.01–1 μM, while the concentration of AA and UA is 100–1000 times higher than that of DA. Hence simultaneous detection of these analytes and the ability to detect DA selectively is important in sensor fabrication. AA is mostly oxidized at similar potentials with DA which results in overlapping of signals on most modified electrodes. The selectivity and sensitivity of MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes towards DA was investigated using CV with increasing concentration of AA (0.031, 0.058, 0.081, 0.1, 0.12, 0.13, 0.14, 0.16, 0.17, 0.18 mM) while the concentration of DA (0.085 mM) was kept constant. In Fig. 15, two well separated oxidation peaks of AA and DA were observed for all the four electrodes. It was observed that up to 30-fold excess of AA there was no significant interference between AA and DA peaks separations. Oxidation peak potentials and the difference between the two peak potentials are summarized in Table 3. The difference between oxidation peak potentials for all the four electrodes was high enough to distinguish DA from AA. The height and the amplitude of the oxidation peaks corresponding to AA increased proportionally with the concentration of AA. At MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc modified electrodes there was a shift in peak potentials of DA as compared to original peak potentials in the catalysis studies. Although it was mentioned that in neutral pH, AA is negatively charged and DA is positively charged61,62,64, therefore the substantial shift in peak potentials could be related to the electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged AA, the electron reach oxygen atom of the MO nanoparticles and the negatively charged COO functionalized MWCNT. It can be seen that the anodic peak signals of AA and DA were independent from each other; therefore the modified electrodes were able to adequately identify the two analytes. The height and amplitude of the peak corresponding to DA also increase proportionally with the DA concentration. In fact, in all the concentrations of the DA studied there was no detectable interference of the AA, the signal of the AA was about 200 mV away from that of the DA. However MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc modified electrodes showed better results in terms of peak separation. This might be due to the extension of π-electron systems of Ncs which facilitates its improved repulsion of the interfering species as compared to Pcs analogues73,74.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Cyclic voltammograms of binary mixture of DA and AA at (a) MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, (b) MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, (c) MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and (d) MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc with constant concentration of DA (0.085 mM) and increasing concentration of AA (0.031, 0.058, 0.081, 0.1, 0.12, 0.13, 0.14, 0.16, 0.17, 0.18 mM).

Table 3. Cyclic voltammetric parameters of binary mixture of DA and AA obtained for modified electrodes with constant concentration of DA (0.085 mM) and increasing concentration of AA (0.031, 0.058, 0.081, 0.1, 0.12, 0.13, 0.14, 0.16, 0.17, 0.18 mM).
Fabricated GC electrodes Anodic peak potentials (V)
Peak potential separation (V)
AA DA
MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc −0.01 0.202 0.192
MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc −0.022 0.189 0.167
MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc 0.021 0.218 0.197
MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc 0.024 0.218 0.194

Application of modified electrode in real sample analysis

A square wave voltammetric assay of dopamine present in a dopamine hydrochloride injection, with dopamine content of 200 mg/5 mL (i.e. 40 mg mL−1) was carried out using MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc (Fig. 16) and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc (not shown) modified GC electrodes. The concentration found in each dopamine drug was approximately within the range of the labelled amount, with an average recovery (n = 3) of 119.8 ± 0.06% and 101.3 ± 0.03% for MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc modified GC electrodes respectively suggesting the sensitivity of the developed sensors towards dopamine determination in real life samples. The result is presented in Table 4.

Figure 16.

Figure 16

(a) Square wave voltammetry of modified MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc-GCE in A (dil. DA drug alone), B (DA drug + 2 mL, 2 × 10−4 M DA), C (DA drug + 2 mL 6 × 10−4 M DA), D (DA drug + 2 mL 10 × 10−4 M DA), E (DA drug + 2 mL 15 × 10−4 M DA) and F (DA drug + 2 mL 20 × 10−4 M DA); (b) the standard addition method linear plot of current versus concentration of DA.

Table 4. Results of detection of DA in dopamine hydrochloride injections (n = 3) at MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pca.
Electrode Added (mg/mL) Detected (mg/mL) Recovery (%) RSD %
Sample 1 40 47.50 (34.50)a 119.8 (86.40)a 0.06 (0.69)a
Sample 2 40 40.15 (40.54)a 100.4 (101.30)a 0.09 (0.03)a

Relating electrocatalytic properties of modified electrodes with quantum chemical descriptors of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc

Isaacs et al.75 related electrocatalytic and redox activities of Co-Pc and Co-Nc to experimentally observed electronic spectra of the complexes. In their work, the authors reported nearly the same values of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy (ELUMO) for the two complexes, higher value of highest occupied molecular orbital energy (EHOMO) and lower value of HOMO-LUMO energy gap (∆EL-H) for Co-Nc compared to Co-Pc. Similar results have also been reported earlier based on experimental and theoretical semiempirical calculations76. These and our previous knowledge of frontier molecular orbital (FMO) energies and electron density distributions of Pcs and Ncs motivated us to explore possible correlations between theoretical quantum chemical parameters of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc and the performance of our fabricated electrodes. Even though the composite electrode systems of the form GCE-MWCNT/metal oxide/macrocycle used in the experimental sections could not be modeled in the present work, attempt was made to correlate the observed good electrocatalytic behavior of the electrodes with molecular structure and FMO indices of the utilized macrocycles (29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc).

Figure 17 shows the optimized molecular structures, HOMO and LUMO electron density isosurfaces of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc. The apparent planar geometries, widely delocalized HOMO and LUMO electron densities, and presence of σ and π orbitals in the FMOs are favourable to electron-transport processes between these macrocycles, the metal oxides (Fe3O4 and ZnO) used in the composite electrode systems and the analyte (DA). Computational details and extensive explanations of other quantum chemical parameters on 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc including Mulliken atomic charges are contained in our previous work77.

Figure 17.

Figure 17

Optimized structures (a,d), HOMO (b,e) and LUMO (c,f) electron density isosurfaces of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc respectively77.

Table 5 shows selected quantum chemical descriptors of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc obtained using the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) model chemistry and reported elsewhere77. The results revealed high values of EHOMO and low values of ELUMO for the compounds. Generally, a high value of EHOMO connotes high tendency of a molecule to donate its HOMO electron to a suitable accepting orbital while a low value of ELUMO implies good propensity of a molecule to accept electron into its LUMO from a suitable donor orbital, and vice versa. The results in Table 5 support better electron transport properties of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc and their good electrocatalytic behaviours. It was also observed that 29H,31H-Pc is more disposed to electron acceptance than 2,3-Nc based its lower value of ELUMO and higher value of electronegativity (χ).

Table 5. Quantum chemical parameters for 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc77.
Macrocycle/Parameters EHOMO (eV) ELUMO (eV) ∆EL-H (eV) ϰ (eV)
29H,31H-Pc −4.98 −2.83 2.15 3.91
2,3-Nc −4.55 −2.76 1.79 3.66

If it is assumed that oxidation of DA to dopamine-o-quinone occurred according to the equation78:

graphic file with name srep43181-m4.jpg

then, 29H,31H-Pc with better electron accepting ability (lower ELUMO and higher χ) may show better electrocatalytic property than 2,3-Nc towards DA oxidation. In other words, an electrode system containing a better electron accepting specie as a catalyst may show better detection of DA. This assumption is in agreement with our observed (experimental) LOD values in which electrode systems containing 29H,31H-Pc exhibited lower LODs than those containing 2,3-Nc.

Conclusions

The study described successful modification of GCE electrode with MWCNT, ZnO, Fe2O3, Pc, Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc, MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc nanomaterials. The electrochemical measurements indicated that MWCNT/Fe3O4/2,3-Nc, MWCNT/Fe3O429H,31H-Pc MWCNT/ZnO/2,3-Nc and MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc hybrids have pronounced electrocatalytic properties and enhanced dopamine current response on GCE compared to other catalyst studied. The enhanced current response is associated with the excellent strong super paramagnetic properties of Fe3O4 and high electrical conductivity of MWCNTs, ZnO and phthalocyanines. All the four electrodes showed a good stability with low current drop (<10%) towards DA oxidation. GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc was the best electrodes towards DA detection with very low detection limit that compared with literature, good sensitivity, resistance to electrode fouling, and excellent ability to detect DA without interference from AA signal. Electrocatalytic oxidation of DA on GCE-MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc electrode was diffusion controlled but characterized with some adsorption of electro-oxidation reaction intermediates products. The MWCNT/ZnO/29H,31H-Pc and MWCNT/Fe3O4/29H,31H-Pc GC modified electrodes has also proven to be a potential sensor for dopamine detection in real sample analysis. The relatively high-lying highest occupied molecular orbitals and low-lying lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals of 29H,31H-Pc and 2,3-Nc may be partly responsible for their great electrocatalytic activities. The better sensing properties of 29H,31H-Pc containing modified electrodes towards DA might be connected with the better electron-accepting ability of 29H,31H-Pc (compared to 2,3-Nc).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Mphuthi, N. G. et al. Phthalocyanine Doped Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Platform for the detection of Dopamine. Sci. Rep. 7, 43181; doi: 10.1038/srep43181 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Sasol Inzalo Foundation and the National Research Foundation of South Africa Innovative bursary to N.G.M. A.S.A. thanks the North-West University for post-doctoral fellowship and Obafemi Awolowo University Nigeria for the research leave visit. E.E.E. acknowledges National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa for incentive funding.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions E.E.E. and A.S.A. conceptualised and designed the work and were part of the manuscript write-up. N.G.M., O.E.F. and L.O.O. carried out the experiments, interpreted results and were also involved in the manuscript preparation. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and have agreed to its publication.

References

  1. Hua M. et al. Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review. J. Haz. Mat. 211–212, 317–331 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang C. et al. Non-covalent iron(III)-porphyrin functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and nitrite. Sens. Actuators 62, 109–115 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. Sun D., Zhao Q., Tan F., Wang X. & Gaoa J. Simultaneous detection of dopamine, uric acid, and ascorbic acid using SnO2 nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotubes/carbon paste electrode. Analyst 4, 3283 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. Sancy M., Silva J. F., Pavez J. & Zagal J. H. Simultaneous electrochemical detection of dopamine, ascorbic acid and uric acid using copper-phthalocyanine functionalized mwcnts. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 58, 4 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  5. Fang B. et al. Fabrication of Fe3O4 Nanoparticles Modified Electrode and its Application for Voltammetric Sensing of Dopamine. Electroanalysis 17, 744–748 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  6. Jackowsk K. & Krysinski P. New trends in the electrochemical sensing of dopamine. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 3753–3771 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang D. et al. Novel Electrochemical Detection for Analysis of Monoamine Neurotransmitters in Rat Brain After Administration of (R)-Salsolinol and (R)-N-Methylsalsolinol. Chromatographia 67, 369–374 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. Rahman Md. M., Ahammad A. J. S., Jin J., Ahn S. J. & Lee J. A Comprehensive Review of Glucose Biosensors Based on Nanostructured Metal-Oxides. Sensors 10, 4855–4886 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mazloum-Ardakani M., Beitollahi H., Amini M. K., Mirkhalaf F. & Abdollahi-Alibeik M. New strategy for simultaneous and selective voltammetric determination of norepinephrine, acetaminophen and folic acid using ZrO2 nanoparticles-modified carbon paste electrode. Sens. Actuators B 151, 243–249 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  10. Prakash S., Chakrabarty T., Singh A. K. & Shahi V. K. Polymer thin films embedded with metal nanoparticles for electrochemical biosensors applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 41, 43–53 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shan Lin M. & Leu H. J. A Fe3O4-Based Chemical Sensor for Cathodic Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide. Electroanalysis 17, 2068–2073 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  12. Adekunle A. S. & Ozoemena K. I. Voltammetric and Impedimetric Properties of Nano-scaled Fe2O3 Catalysts Supported on Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Catalytic Detection of Dopamine. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 5, 1726–1742 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen C. S. et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticle decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes and their optical properties. Acta Mater. 54, 5401–5407 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  14. Aravind S. S. J. & Ramaprabhu S. Dopamine biosensor with metal oxide nanoparticles decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanosci. Met. 1, 102–114 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. Sangeetha G., Rajeshwari S. & Venckatesh R. Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles by aloe barbadensis miller leaf extract: Structure and optical properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 46, 2560–2566 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Ambily S. & Menon C. S. Determination of the thermal activation energy and optical band gap of cobalt phthalocyanine thin films. Mater. Lett. 34, 124–127 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  17. Zanguina A., Bayo-Bangoura M., Bayo K. & Ouedraogo G. V. IR and UV-Visible Spectra of Iron(ii) Phthalocyanine Complexes With Phosphine or Phosphite. Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 16, 73–79 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  18. Schramm C. J. et al. Chemical, Spectral, Structural, and Charge Transport Properties of the “Molecular Metals” Produced by Iodination of Nickel Phthalocyanine. Chem. Soc. 102, 6702–6713 (1980). [Google Scholar]
  19. Claessens C. G., Hahn U. & Torres T. Phthalocyanines: From Outstanding Electronic Properties to Emerging Applications. The Chemical Record 8, 75–97 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zhou R., Jose F., Gopel W., Ozturk Z. Z. & Bekaroglu O. Phthalocyanines as Sensitive Materials for Chemical Sensors. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 10, 557–577 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang B., Wu Y., Wang X., Chen Z. & He C. Copper phthalocyanine non covalent functionalized single-walled carbon nanotube with enhanced NH3 sensing performance. Sens. Actuators 190, 157–164 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  22. Tran N. L., Bohrer F. I., Trogler W. C. & Kummel A. C. A density functional theory study of the correlation between analyte basicity, ZnPc adsorption strength, and sensor response. J. Chem. Phys. 130, 204–307 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Liang X. et al. Enhanced NH3-sensing behavior of 2,9,16,23-tetrakis(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy) metal(II) phthalocyanine/multi-walled carbon nanotube hybrids: an investigation of the effects of central metals. Carbon 80, 268–278 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang B., Zhou X., Wu Y., Chena Z. & He C. Lead phthalocyanine modified carbon nanotubes with enhanced NH3 sensing performance. Sens. Actuators 171–172, 398–404 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Zuo X., Zhang H. & Li N. An electrochemical biosensor for determination of ascorbic acid by cobalt (II) phthalocyanine–multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode. Sens. Actuators 161, 1074–1079 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  26. Martin C. S., Gouveia-Caridade C., Crespilho F. N., Constantino C. J. L. & Brett C. M. A. Iron Phthalocyanine Electrodeposited Films: Characterization and Influence on Dopamine Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 120(29), 15698–15706 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaidarova L. G., Gedmina A. V., Artamonova M. L., Chelnokova I. A. & Budnikov H. C. Voltammetry Determination of Dopamine by the Electrocatalytic Response of an Electrode Modified by a Polyaniline Film with an Inclusion of Copper(II) Tetrasulfophthalocyanine. J. Anal. Chem. 68(6), 516–524 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Karuppiah C. et al. Fabrication of nickel tetrasulphonated phthalocyanine functionalised multiwalled carbon nanotubes on activated glassy carbon electrode for the detection of dopamine. Electroanalysis 27, 485–493 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Naik R. R., Niranjana E. E., Swamy B. E. K., Sherigara B. S. & Jayadevappa H. Surfactant Induced Iron (II) Phthalocyanine Modified Carbon Paste Electrode for Simultaneous Detection of Ascorbic Acid, Dopamine And Uric Acid. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 3, 1574–1583 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  30. Sancy M., Silva J. F., Pavez J. & Zagal J. H. Simultaneous Electrochemical Detection Of Dopamine, Ascorbic Acid And Uric Acid Using Copper-Phthalocyanine Functionalized Mwcnts. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 58(4), 2117–2121 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  31. Radhakrishnana S., Krishnamoorthy K., Sekar C., Wilson J. & Kim S. J. A highly sensitive electrochemical sensor for nitrite detection based on Fe2O3 nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide nanosheets. Appl. Cat. B: Environ. 148–149, 22–28 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  32. Gusatti M. et al. Synthesis of ZnO Nanostructures in Low Reaction Temperature. Chem. Eng. Trans. 17, 1017–1022 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  33. Qu S. et al. Magnetite Nanoparticles Prepared by Precipitation from Partially Reduced Ferric Chloride Aqueous Solutions. J. Coll. Int. Sci. 215, 190–192 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Borker P. & Salker A. V. Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic studies of some metal phthalocyanines. J. Chem. Tech. 13, 341–346 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  35. Seoudi R., El-Bahy G. S. & El Sayed Z. A. Ultraviolet and visible spectroscopic studies of phthalocyanine and its complexes thin films. Optical Materials 29, 304–312 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  36. Becheri A., Durr M., Lo Nostro P. & Baglioni P. Synthesis and characterization of zinc oxide nanoparticles: application to textiles as UV-absorbers. J. Nanopart. Res. 10, 679–689 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  37. Ahmad S., Riaz U., Kaushik A. & Alam J. Soft Template Synthesis of Super Paramagnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticles a Novel Technique. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 19, 355–360 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  38. Davidson A. T. The effect of the metal atom on the absorption spectra of phthalocyanine films. J. Chem. Phys. 77, 168 (1982). [Google Scholar]
  39. El-Nahass M. M., Abd-El-Rahman K. F. & Darwish A. A. A. Fourier-transform infrared and UV–vis spectroscopes of nickel phthalocyanine thin films. Mater. Chem. and Phys. 92, 185–189 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  40. Spadavecchia J., Ciccarella G. & Rella R. Optical characterization and analysis of the gas/surface adsorption phenomena on phthalocyanines thin films for gas sensing application. Sens. Actuators B 106, 212–220 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang L. et al. Control synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4–chitosan nanoparticles under UV irradiation in aqueous system. Curr. Appl. Phys. 10, 828–833 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  42. Wang J. Carbon-Nanotube Based Electrochemical Biosensors: A Review. Electroanalysis 17, 7–14 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  43. Li G., Jiang Y., Huang K., Ding P. & Chen J. Preparation and properties of magnetic Fe3O4–chitosan nanoparticles. J. Alloy. Comp. 466, 451–456 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  44. Dung D. T. K. et al. Preparation and characterization of magnetic nanoparticles with chitosan coating. Conference Series 187, 012–036 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  45. Kanade K. G., Kale B. B., Aiyer R. C. & Das B. K. Effect of solvents on the synthesis of nano-size zinc oxide and its properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 41, 590–600 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  46. Awodugba A. & Ilyas A. synthesis and characterization of ZnO nanoparticles with zinc chloride as zinc source. J. Nat. Appl. Sci. 2, 41–44 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  47. Nair M. G., Nirmala M., Rekha K. & Anukaliani A. Structural, optical, photo catalytic and antibacterial activity of ZnO and Co doped ZnO nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 65, 1797–1800 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  48. Prabhu Y. T., Rao K. V., Kumar V. S. S. & Kumari B. S. Synthesis of ZnO Nanoparticles by a Novel Surfactant Assisted Amine Combustion Method. Adv. Nanopar. 2, 45–50 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  49. Rekha K., Nirmala M., Nair M. G. & Anukaliani A. Structural, optical, photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of zinc oxide and manganese doped zinc oxide nanoparticles. Physica B 405, 3180–3185 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  50. Anjalin F. M. Synthesis and characterization of MWCNTs/PVDF nanocomposite and its electrical studies. Der. Pharma. Chemica. 6, 354–359 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  51. Liu M., Lin M. C., Huang I. & Wang C. Enhancement of thermal conductivity with carbon nanotube for nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 32, 1202–1210 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  52. McNallya T., Potschke P., Halley P., Murphy M., Martin D., Bell S. E. J., Brennane G. P., Bein D., Lemoine P., Quinn J. P. et al. Polyethylene multiwalled carbon nanotube composites. Polymer 46, 8222–8232 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  53. Hong R. Y. et al. Synthesis, surface modification and photocatalytic property of ZnO nanoparticles. Powder Technology 189, 426–432 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang H., Zhong X., Xu J. & Chen H. Fe3O4/Polypyrrole/Au Nanocomposites with Core/Shell/Shell Structure: Synthesis, Characterization, and Their Electrochemical Properties. Langmuir 24, 13748–13752 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zang J., Li C. M., Cui X., Wang J., Sun X., Dong H. & Sun C. Q. Tailoring Zinc Oxide Nanowires for High Performance Amperometric Glucose Sensor. Electroanalysis 19, 1008–1014 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu S. et al. Layer-by-layer assembled multilayer films of reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles for the electrochemical detection of dopamine. J. Electroanal. Chem. 672, 40–44 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhang C. et al. A hydroxylamine electrochemical sensor based on electrodeposition of porous ZnO nanofilms onto carbon nanotubes films modified electrode. Electrochim. Acta 55, 2835–2840 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  58. Rosy K., Yadav S. K., Agrawal B., Oyama M. & Goyal R. N. Graphene modified Palladium sensor for electrochemical analysis of norepinephrine in pharmaceuticals and biological fluids. Electrochim. Acta 125, 622–629 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  59. Nyokong T. In Electronic Spectral and Electrochemical Behavior of Near Infrared Absorbing Metallophthalocyanines, Series: Structure and Bonding; Fucntional Phthalocyanine: Molecular Materials (Ed: Jiang J.) ch 2, P. 66 (Springer, Heidelberg 2010). [Google Scholar]
  60. Atta N. F., Galal A., Abdel-Gawad F. M. & Mohamed E. F. Electrochemical Morphine Sensor Based on Gold Nanoparticles Metalphthalocyanine Modified Carbon Paste Electrode. Electroanalysis 27, 415–428, 415 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  61. Adekunle A. S., Agboola B. O., Pillay J. & Ozoemena K. I. Electrocatalytic detection of dopamine at single-walled carbon nanotubes-iron (III) oxide nanoparticles platform. Sens. And Actaut. Chemical B 148, 93–102 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  62. Fashedemia O. O. & Ozoemena K. I. A facile approach to the synthesis of hydrophobic iron tetrasulfophthalocyanine (FeTSPc) nano-aggregates on multi-walled carbon nanotubes: A potential electrocatalyst for the detection of dopamine. Sens. Actuators B 160, 7–14 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  63. Charkoudian L. K. & Franz K. J. Fe(III)-coordination properties of neuromelanin components: 5,6-dihydroxyindole and 5,6-dihydroxyindole-2-carboxylic acid. Inorg. Biochem. 45, 3657–3664 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Giz M. J., Duong B. & Tao N. T. In situ STM study of self-assembled mercaptopropionic acid monolayers for electrochemical detection of dopamine. J. Electroanal. Chem. 465, 72–79 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  65. Adekunle A. S. et al. Electrochemical response of nitrite and nitric oxide on graphene oxide nanoparticles doped with Prussian blue (PB) and Fe2O3 nanoparticles. RSC Adv. 5, 27759–27774 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  66. Apetrei I. M. & Apetrei C. Biosensor based on tyrosinase immobilized on a single-walled carbon nanotube-modified glassy carbon electrode for detection of epinephrine. Int. J. Nanomed. 8, 4391–4398 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Bard A. J. & Faulkner L. R. Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, pp. 833 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 2001). [Google Scholar]
  68. Harrison J. A. & Khan Z. A. The oxidation of hydrazine on platinum in acid solution. J. Electroanal. Chem. 28, 131–138 (1970). [Google Scholar]
  69. Qijin W., Nianjun Y., Haili Z., Xinpin Z. & Bin X. Voltammetric behavior of vitamin B2 on the gold electrode modified with a self-assembled monolayer of L-cysteine and its application for the determination of vitamin B2 using linear sweep stripping voltammetry. Talanta 55, 459–467 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Christian G. D. Analytical Chemistry, Student Solution Manual, 6th Ed. p. 113 (Wiley, New York, 2004). [Google Scholar]
  71. Fialkov A. B., Steiner U., Lehotay S. J. & Amirav A. Sensitivity and noise in GC–MS: Achieving low limits of detection for difficult analytes. Int. J. Mass Spec. 260, 31–48 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  72. Theodore M., Hosur M., Thomas J. & Jeelani S. Influence of functionalization on properties of MWCNT–epoxy nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 1192–1200 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  73. Li X., Long N. J., Clifford J. N., Campbell, C., J. & Durrant J. R. New peripherally-substituted naphthalocyanines: synthesis, characterization and evaluation in dye-sensitised photoelectrochemical solar cells. New J. Chem. 26, 1076–1080 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  74. Yang G. Y. et al. Synthesis and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Fluorine-Containing Naphthalocyanines. Chem. Eur. J. 9, 2758–2762 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Isaacs M. et al. Comparative study of the electrocatalytic activity of cobalt phthalocyanine and cobalt naphthalocyanine for the reduction of oxygen and the oxidation of hydrazine. Electrochim. Acta 43, 1821–1827 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  76. Kobayashi N. Konami. Phthalocyanines, Edited by Lezno C. C. & Lever A. B. P., Vol. 4 (VCH Publishers, USA, 1993). [Google Scholar]
  77. Dibetsoe M. et al. Some phthalocyanine and naphthalocyanine derivatives as corrosion inhibitors for aluminium in acidic medium: Experimental, quantum chemical calculations, QSAR studies and synergistic Effect of iodide ions. Molecules 20, 15701–15734 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Chandra U., Swamy B. E. K., Gilbert O. & Sherigara B. S. Voltammetric detection of dopamine in presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid at poly (xylenol orange) film-coated graphite pencil electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. 2011, 1–8, doi: 10.4061/2011/512692 (2011). [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES