Abstract
Early onset and late onset essential tremor (ET) cases differ in several respects. Whether they differ with respect to cerebellar pathologic changes remains to be determined. We quantified a broad range of postmortem features (Purkinje cell (PC) counts, PC axonal torpedoes and associated axonal changes, heterotopic PCs, and hairy basket ratings) in 30 ET cases with age of tremor onset <50 years, 30 ET cases with age of tremor onset ≥50 years, and 30 controls (total n = 90). We also used two alternative age of onset cut-points (<40 vs. ≥40 years, and <60 vs. ≥60 years) to define early onset vs. late onset ET. We found that ET cases with tremor onset <50 years and tremor onset ≥50 years had similar PC counts (8.78 ± 1.70 vs. 8.86 ± 1.24, p = 0.839), PC axonal torpedo counts (17.87 ± 18.27 [median =13.00] vs. 12.90 ± 10.60 [median =9.0], p = 0.486) and associated axonal pathology (all p values >0.05), heterotopic PC counts (9.90 ± 11.55 [median =6.00] vs. 5.40 ± 5.10 [median =3.50], p = 0.092), and hairy basket ratings (1.95 ± 0.62 [median =2.00] vs. 2.05 ± 0.92 [median =2.00], p = 0.314). When using the age of onset cut-points of 40 or 60 years, results were similar. Early onset and late onset ET cases share similar cerebellar postmortem features. These data do not support the notion that these age-of-onset related forms of ET represent distinct clinical-pathological entities.
Keywords: Essential tremor, Age of onset, Cerebellum, Neurodegenerative, Purkinje cell, Pathology
Introduction
Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most prevalent movement disorders [1]. Clinical and neuroimaging evidence suggests that the cerebellum plays an important role in tremor generation in ET [2–6]. We have reported a constellation of pathological changes in the ET cerebellum, including an increase in torpedoes and associated Purkinje cell (PC) axonal pathologies [7, 8], an increase in heterotopic PCs [9], and abnormal basket cell axons with a dense and tangled appearance (“hairiness”) surrounding the PC soma and elongated processes extending past the PC axon initial segment [10, 11]. In addition to these changes we have also reported PC loss [7, 12], a finding that has been variably reproduced [13–15]. These pathological changes further reinforce the notion that the cerebellum is of mechanistic importance in ET.
The age of tremor onset in ET is bimodal [16]. ET cases with an early age of tremor onset more commonly report a family history of tremor. By contrast, ET cases with a late age of tremor onset may have a faster rate of tremor progression and may differ from early onset cases in terms of their risk of dementia and mortality [16–19]. Therefore, it is possible that early onset ET and late onset ET represent different disease subtypes [16]. There are physiological data supporting this notion; for example, a recent electroencephalogram (EEG) coherence study suggested that early onset ET cases and late onset ET cases may differ with respect to brain circuitry [20]. Given the possibility that early onset ET and late onset ET could be pathophysiologically distinct, we capitalized on a large, prospectively assembled collection of ET brains, including both young and old onset, to investigate whether the postmortem changes in the cerebellum differ across age of onset groups.
Methods
Brain Repository, Study Subjects, and Neuropathological Assessment
ET brains were from the Essential Tremor Centralized Brain Repository (ETCBR), a joint effort between investigators at Yale and Columbia Universities. All ET diagnoses were carefully assigned using three sequential methods, as described in detail [8]. In brief, the clinical diagnosis of ET was initially assigned by treating neurologists, and then confirmed by an ETCBR study neurologist (EDL) using questionnaires, review of medical records, and review of Archimedes spirals. Finally, a detailed, videotaped, neurological examination was performed, and published diagnostic criteria applied, as described [21]. Total tremor scores (range =0–36) were assigned based on the severity of postural and kinetic (pouring, drinking, using spoon, drawing spirals, finger-nose-finger) tremor on examination. None of the ET cases had a history of traumatic brain injury, a history of exposure to medications known to cause cerebellar damage, or heavy ethanol use, as previously defined [8, 22].
The majority of the control brains were obtained from the New York Brain Bank (NYBB) (n = 21) and were from individuals followed at the Alzheimer disease (AD) Research Center or the Washington Heights Inwood Columbia Aging Project at Columbia University. They were followed prospectively with serial neurological examinations, and were clinically free of AD, ET, Parkinson’s disease (PD), Lewy body dementia, or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Nine control brains were from Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (McLean Hosptial, Belmont, MA). During life, all study subjects signed informed consent approved by these University Ethics Boards.
There were 133 ET cases in the ETCBR with clear documentation of age of tremor onset. This age of tremor onset distribution was bimodal, with a median at 50 years. We performed a power analysis that utilized data from our previous publications on PC counts [7], torpedo counts [7], and heterotopic PCs [9] in ET cases and controls. With a sample size of 14–26 in each group, we would be powered at 90 % to detect differences of the magnitude previously detected. Therefore, with 30 per group (30 early onset ET cases, 30 late onset ET cases, and 30 controls), power was >90 %. Based on age at death, and blinded to all other clinical information, we frequency-matched 30 in each of the two ET groups to the 30 available control subjects.
All ET and control brains had a complete neuropathological assessment at the NYBB and Harvard Brain Bank. Brains had standardized measurements of brain weight (grams), postmortem interval (PMI, hours between death and placement of brain in a cold room or upon ice), Braak and Braak AD staging for neurofibrillary tangles [23, 24], and Consortium to Establish a Registry for AD (CERAD) ratings for neuritic plaques [25]. We did not include ET cases with Lewy body pathology (α-synuclein staining) [7] or PSP pathology [26].
Characterization of Cerebellar Pathology
A standard 3 × 20 × 25 mm parasagittal, formalin-fixed, tissue block was harvested from the neocerebellum; the block included the cerebellar cortex, white matter, and dentate nucleus [8]. A senior neuropathologist (P.L.F.) who was blinded to all clinical information counted torpedoes and heterotopic PCs (PCs whose cell bodies were completely surrounded by the molecular layer and that did not contact the granule layer) throughout one entire LH&E 7-μm thick section [9]. As described, PCs were counted and averaged from 15 microscopic fields at 100× magnification (LH&E) [8].
In addition, 7-μm thick paraffin sections were stained by modified Bielschowsky silver technique and a semi-quantitative hairy basket rating scale was applied in each section: 0 (few, or no discernible processes); 1 (sparse number of processes); 2 (moderate number of processes); and 3 (dense tangle of processes). In some instances, as described, the rater used intermediate values (0.5, 1.5, and 2.5) [10].
CalbindinD28k immunohistochemistry was performed in free-floating 100 μm thick, formalin-fixed vibratome sections of cerebellar cortex to visualize PC axonal morphology. The sections were heated at 37 °C for 10 min in 20 μg/mL Proteinase K (Roche Applied Science) in 10 mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 8, followed by 1 % hydrogen peroxide in PBS for 30 min and serum blocking solution (10 % normal goat serum, 1 % IgG-free bovine serum albumin [Jackson Immunoresearch], 1 % Triton™X-100, in PBS) for 1 h. Rabbit polyclonal anti-calbindin D28k (1:1000, Swant) was applied overnight at 4 °C in antibody diluent (1 % IgG-free bovine serum albumin, 1 % Triton™X-100 in PBS). Secondary antibody (1:200, 2 h, biotin-SP goat-anti-rabbit [Fisher Scientific]), followed by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:200, 1 h, AbD Serotec, for biotinlyated antibodies) was developed with 3,3′ diaminobenzidene chromogen solution (Dako). As described, PC axonal morphology in ten randomly-selected 100× images was quantified: axon recurrent collaterals (with at least a 90° turn back towards the PC layer from their initial trajectory), thickened PC axonal profiles (axons at least double the width of other apparently normal axons), and PC axonal branching (any PC axon with at least one branch point; multiple bifurcations on the same axon were not separately counted) [8].
Statistical Analyses
The mean age of onset is most commonly reported to be between 45 and 55 years in ET [27–33]; in the current sample it was just below 50. Therefore, we chose an age of onset of 50 years as the cut-point in our primary analysis. We first compared clinical and pathological characteristics between ET cases and controls, and then further compared these features in early onset ET cases (tremor onset <50 years old), late onset ET cases (tremor onset ≥50 years), and controls. Clinical characteristics such as gender and the presence of family history of tremor were compared using chi-square tests. Age at death and PC counts were normally distributed; thus we compared groups using analysis of variance followed by LSD post-hoc analyses. Torpedoes, heterotopic PCs, hairy basket rating, PC axonal recurrent collateral counts, PC thickened axon counts, and PC axonal branching counts were not normally distributed. Therefore, we used independent samples Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare among three groups, and we further compared the differences between two groups using Mann-Whitney tests. In addition to using the age of onset cut-point of 50 years old to define early vs. late onset ET cases, we performed additional analyses using the age of onset cut-points of 40 and 60 years old. We also performed a correlation analysis between disease duration, total tremor scores, and each pathological feature. For normally distributed variables, we used Pearson’s correlation coefficients; for non-normally distributed variables, we used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Data were analyzed in SPSS (v22).
Results
The 60 ET cases and 30 controls were similar in age at death and gender (Table 1). Consistent with previous reports [7–12], when compared with controls, ET cases had lower PC counts, more torpedoes, more heterotopic PCs, a higher hairy basket rating, an increase in PC axonal collaterals, an increase in PC thickened axonal profiles, and an increase in PC axonal branching (Table 1).
Table 1.
Clinical and pathological features of controls and essential tremor cases
| Variables | Controls | ET cases | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 30 | 60 | |
| Age at death (years) | 85.23 ± 5.67 | 86.03 ± 6.63 | 0.573a |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 44.02 ± 21.60 | NA |
| Median = 47.50 | |||
| Duration of disease (years) | NA | 42.02 ± 21.51 | NA |
| Median =39.00 | |||
| Gender | 0.226b | ||
| Male | 15 (50.0 %) | 22 (36.7 %) | |
| Female | 15 (50.0 %) | 38 (63.3 %) | |
| History of tremor in familyc | NA | ||
| No | NA | 30 (52.6 %) | |
| Yes | NA | 27 (47.4 %) | |
| Total tremor scores | NA | 12.45 ± 3.19 | NA |
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.82 ± 1.48 | <0.001 a |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 | 15.38 ± 15.02 | <0.001 d |
| Median =3.00 | Median =12.00 | ||
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts | 6.23 ± 11.45 | 7.65 ± 9.14 | 0.020 d |
| Median =2.00 | Median =4.50 | ||
| Hairy basket ratings | 1.57 ± 0.61 | 2.00 ± 0.78 | 0.004 d |
| Median =1.50 | Median =2.00 | ||
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts | 1.01 ± 1.16 | 1.88 ± 1.53 | 0.006 d |
| Median =0.60 | Median =1.42 | ||
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts | 0.96 ± 1.60 | 1.76 ± 2.32 | 0.017 d |
| Median =0.55 | Median =1.09 | ||
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts | 0.09 ± 0.10 | 0.37 ± 0.40 | <0.001 d |
| Median =0.07 | Median =0.27 |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well. Mean number of Purkinje cell counts (PCs) per 100× microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields
NA not applicable
Independent samples t test
Chi-square test
Unknown in three ET cases
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
We compared the clinical characteristics of ET cases with tremor onset before and after 50 years old (early onset and late onset) and controls. There were no differences in age at death and gender between early onset and late onset ET cases and controls. Early onset ET cases and late onset ET cases did not differ significantly in terms of their PC counts, torpedo counts, heterotopic PC counts, hairy basket ratings, PC axonal recurrent collateral counts, PC thickened axonal profile counts, and PC axonal branching counts (Table 2). When compared to controls, both ET groups had significantly lower PC counts, more torpedoes, higher hairy basket cell ratings, more PC axonal recurrent collaterals, and more PC axonal branching. Only early onset ET cases had more heterotopic PCs than controls. Late onset ET cases had more PC thickened axonal profiles than controls, with early onset ET cases having an intermediate value (Table 2).
Table 2.
Clinical and pathological features of controls and essential tremor cases grouped by age of tremor onset 50 years
| Variables | Controls | ET cases |
p value (all three groups) |
p value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of tremor onset <50 years |
Age of tremor onset ≥50 years |
Controls vs. ET <50 years |
Controls vs. ET ≥50 years |
ET <50 years vs. ET ≥50 years |
|||
| n | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||
| Age at death (years) | 85.23 ± 5.67 | 85.80 ± 7.45 | 86.27 ± 5.81 | 0.820a | 0.731b | 0.531b | 0.777b |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 25.47 ± 12.89 | 62.57 ± 8.44 | < 0.001c | |||
| Duration of disease (years) | NA | 60.33 ± 13.42 | 23.70 ± 8.18 | < 0.001c | |||
| Gender | 0.277d | ||||||
| Male | 15 (50.0 %) | 13 (43.3 %) | 9 (30.0 %) | ||||
| Female | 15 (50.0 %) | 17 (56.7 %) | 21 (70.0 %) | ||||
| History of tremor in familye |
0.146d | ||||||
| No | NA | 18 (62.1 %) | 12 (42.9 %) | ||||
| Yes | NA | 11 (37.9 %) | 16 (57.1 %) | ||||
| Total tremor scores | NA | 13.01 ± 3.41 | 11.77 ± 2.86 | 0.205c | |||
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.78 ± 1.70 | 8.86 ± 1.24 | <0.001a | < 0.001b | < 0.001b | 0.839b |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 | 17.87 ± 18.27 | 12.90 ± 10.60 | <0.001f | < 0.001g | < 0.001g | 0.486g |
| Median =3.00 |
Median =13.00 | Median =9.00 | |||||
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts |
6.23 ± 11.45 | 9.90 ± 11.55 | 5.40 ± 5.10 | 0.021 f | 0.009 g | 0.155g | 0.092g |
| Median =2.00 |
Median =6.00 | Median =3.50 | |||||
| Hairy basket ratings | 1.57 ± 0.61 | 1.95 ± 0.62 | 2.05 ± 0.92 | 0.012 f | 0.022 g | 0.008 g | 0.314g |
| Median =1.50 |
Median =2.00 | Median =2.00 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts |
1.01 ± 1.16 | 1.99 ± 1.79 | 1.74 ± 1.17 | 0.022 f | 0.016 g | 0.021 g | 0.772g |
| Median =0.60 |
Median =1.29 | Median =1.73 | |||||
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts |
0.96 ± 1.60 | 1.59 ± 2.58 | 1.96 ± 2.01 | 0.018 e | 0.133 f | 0.006 f | 0.107 f |
| Median =0.55 |
Median =0.86 | Median =1.47 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts |
0.09 ± 0.10 | 0.37 ± 0.49 | 0.37 ± 0.24 | 0.001 e | 0.006 f | < 0.001 f | 0.382 f |
| Median =0.07 |
Median =0.24 | Median =0.38 | |||||
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well. Mean number of Purkinje cell counts (PCs) per 100× microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields
NA not applicable
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD method) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Independent samples t test
Chi-square test
Unknown in three ET cases
Independent samples Kruskal-Wallis H test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
Early onset ET cases had longer disease duration than late onset ET cases, which might be a confounding factor when comparing the pathological changes in these two groups. Therefore, we studied whether the disease duration correlated with each of the pathological features in ET. We found that disease duration did not correlate with any of the pathological features (Table 3). In addition, the total tremor scores did not correlate to a significant degree (p < 0.05) with pathological changes in ET (Table 3). Therefore, neither disease duration nor tremor severity would have been confounding factors.
Table 3.
Correlations of pathological characteristics with duration of disease and total tremor scores in ET cases
| Disease duration |
Total tremor scores |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r or rs | p value | r or rs | p value | |
| Purkinje cell counts | 0.075b | 0.570b | −0.167a | 0.278a |
| Torpedo counts | 0.080b | 0.541b | −0.038b | 0.807b |
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts | 0.209b | 0.110b | −0.029b | 0.850b |
| Hairy basket ratings | −0.049b | 0.708b | −0.232b | 0.130b |
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts | −0.094b | 0.575b | 0.186b | 0.326b |
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts | −0.316b | 0.053b | −0.340b | 0.066b |
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts | −0.238b | 0.169b | −0.001b | 0.997b |
Pearson correlation analysis
Spearman correlation analysis
We also explored alternative age of onset cut-points. First, we used the value 40 years to define early onset ET cases and late onset ET cases. Similarly, there were no differences in any of the pathological features assessed between ET cases with tremor onset <40 years old and ET cases with tremor onset ≥40 years old (Table 4). Second, we chose 60 years old as a second alternative age cut-point. We did not find any differences in cerebellar pathological features between ET cases with tremor onset <60 years old and ET cases with tremor onset ≥60 years old except for PC thickened axonal profiles: ET cases with tremor onset ≥60 years old had 64 % more PC thickened axonal profiles than ET cases with tremor onset <60 years old (Table 5).
Table 4.
Clinical and pathological features of controls and essential tremor cases grouped by age of tremor onset 40 years
| Variables | Controls | Essential tremor cases |
p value |
p value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of tremor onset <40 years |
Age of tremor onset ≥40 years |
Controls vs. <40 years |
Controls vs. ≥40 years |
<40 years vs. ≥40 years |
|||
| n | 30 | 23 | 37 | ||||
| Age at death (years) | 85.23 ± 5.67 | 84.61 ± 7.41 | 86.92 ± 6.03 | 0.332a | 0.721b | 0.279b | 0.171b |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 20.26 ± 9.82 | 58.78 ± 11.00 | <0.001c | |||
| Duration of disease (years) | NA | 64.35 ± 12.23 | 28.14 ± 12.25 | <0.001c | |||
| Gender | 0.458d | ||||||
| Male | 15 (50.0 %) | 9 (39.1 %) | 13 (35.1 %) | ||||
| Female | 15 (50.0 %) | 14 (60.9 %) | 24 (64.9 %) | ||||
| History of tremor in familye | 0.306d | ||||||
| No | NA | 14 (60.9 %) | 16 (47.1 %) | ||||
| Yes | NA | 9 (39.1 %) | 18 (52.9 %) | ||||
| Total tremor scores | NA | 13.21 ± 2.92 | 11.81 ± 3.33 | 0.150c | |||
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.69 ± 1.60 | 8.90 ± 1.41 | <0.001a | <0.001b | <0.001b | 0.670b |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 | 18.17 ± 18.25 | 13.65 ± 12.58 | <0.001f | <0.001g | <0.001g | 0.333g |
| Median =3.00 |
Median =14.00 | Median =9.00 | |||||
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts |
6.23 ± 11.45 | 8.48 ± 11.14 | 7.14 ± 7.77 | 0.066e | 0.050g | 0.039 g | 0.915g |
| Median =2.00 |
Median =4.00 | Median =6.00 | |||||
| Hairy basket ratings | 1.57 ± 0.61 | 1.98 ± 0.67 | 2.01 ± 0.85 | 0.016 f | 0.027 g | 0.008 g | 0.618g |
| Median =1.50 |
Median =2.00 | Median =2.00 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts |
1.01 ± 1.16 | 1.98 ± 1.65 | 1.81 ± 1.47 | 0.023 f | 0.013 g | 0.023 g | 0.919g |
| Median =0.60 |
Median =1.18 | Median =1.67 | |||||
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts |
0.96 ± 1.60 | 1.12 ± 1.13 | 2.22 ± 2.83 | 0.025 f | 0.156g | 0.011 g | 0.137g |
| Median =0.55 |
Median =0.80 | Median =1.32 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts |
0.09 ± 0.10 | 0.29 ± 0.25 | 0.44 ± 0.49 | 0.001 f | 0.015 g | <0.001g | 0.403g |
| Median =0.07 |
Median =0.27 | Median =0.30 | |||||
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well Mean number of Purkinje cell counts (PCs) per 100× microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields
NA not applicable
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD method) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Independent samples t test
Chi-square test
Unknown in three ET cases
Independent samples Kruskal-Wallis H test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
Table 5.
Clinical and pathological features of controls and essential tremor cases grouped by age of tremor onset 60 years
| Variables | Controls | Essential tremor cases |
p value |
p value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age of tremor onset <60 years |
Age of tremor onset ≥60 years |
Controls vs. <60 years |
Controls vs. ≥60 years |
<60 years vs. ≥60 years |
|||
| n | 30 | 41 | 19 | ||||
| Age at death (years) | 85.23 ± 5.67 | 85.17 ± 7.13 | 87.89 ± 5.09 | 0.256a | 0.967b | 0.152b | 0.122b |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 33.34 ± 17.18 | 67.05 ± 7.31 | <0.001c | |||
| Duration of disease (years) | NA | 51.83 ± 18.58 | 20.84 ± 7.53 | <0.001c | |||
| Gender | 0.259d | ||||||
| Male | 15 (50.0 %) | 17 (41.5 %) | 5 (26.3 %) | ||||
| Female | 15 (50.0 %) | 24 (58.5 %) | 14 (73.7 %) | ||||
| History of tremor in familye | 0.976d | ||||||
| No | NA | 21 (52.5 %) | 9 (52.9 %) | ||||
| Yes | NA | 19 (47.5 %) | 8 (47.1 %) | ||||
| Total tremor scores | NA | 12.63 ± 3.34 | 11.96 ± 2.83 | 0.539c | |||
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.85 ± 1.51 | 8.77 ± 1.44 | <0.001a | <0.001b | < 0.001 b | 0.799b |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 | 16.80 ± 17.08 | 12.32 ± 8.75 | <0.001f | < 0.001g | < 0.001g | 0.627g |
| Median =3.00 |
Median =13.00 | Median =9.00 | |||||
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts |
6.23 ± 11.45 | 8.51 ± 10.21 | 5.79 ± 6.04 | 0.033 f | 0.011 g | 0.268g | 0.216g |
| Median =2.00 |
Median =6.00 | Median =3.00 | |||||
| Hairy basket ratings | 1.57 ± 0.61 | 2.01 ± 0.70 | 1.97 ± 0.95 | 0.017 f | 0.005 g | 0.055f | 0.858g |
| Median =1.50 |
Median =2.00 | Median =2.00 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts |
1.01 ± 1.16 | 1.87 ± 1.64 | 1.89 ± 1.31 | 0.022 f | 0.012 f | 0.033 f | 0.653g |
| Median =0.60 |
Median =1.20 | Median =1.85 | |||||
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts |
0.96 ± 1.60 | 1.46 ± 2.34 | 2.39 ± 2.23 | 0.005 f | 0.127g | 0.002 g | 0.018 g |
| Median =0.55 |
Median =0.80 | Median =1.59 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts |
0.09 ± 0.10 | 0.36 ± 0.45 | 0.40 ± 0.26 | 0.001 e | 0.002 g | 0.001 g | 0.299g |
| Median =0.07 |
Median =0.25 | Median =0.49 | |||||
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well. Mean number of Purkinje cell counts (PCs) per 100× microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields
NA not applicable
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD method) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Independent samples t test
Chi-square test
Unknown in three ET cases
Independent samples Kruskal-Wallis H test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
We compared cerebellar pathological features in ET cases with and without head tremor. Interestingly, we found that ET cases with head tremor had lower PC counts than ET cases without head tremor; however, the two groups did not differ with respect to any of the other cerebellar pathological features (Table 6).
Table 6.
Clinical and pathological features of essential tremor cases grouped by head tremor
| Variables | Controls | ET casesa |
p value (all three groups) |
p value |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With head tremor |
Without head tremor |
Controls vs. ET with head tremor |
Controls vs. ET without head tremor |
ET with head tremor vs. ET without head tremor |
|||
| n | 30 | 40 | 19 | ||||
| Age at death (years) | 85.23 ± 5.67 | 85.53 ± 6.34 | 87.16 ± 7.42 | 0.731b | 0.850c | 0.306c | 0.360c |
| Age of tremor onset (years) | NA | 42.58 ± 23.39 | 45.84 ± 17.50 | 0.385d | |||
| Duration of disease (years) | NA | 42.95 ± 23.69 | 41.32 ± 16.32 | 0.759d | |||
| Gender | 0.133e | ||||||
| Male | 15 (50.0 %) | 12 (30.0 %) | 10 (52.6 %) | ||||
| Female | 15 (50.0 %) | 28 (70.0 %) | 9 (47.4 %) | ||||
| History of tremor in familyd | 0.260e | ||||||
| No | NA | 18 (47.4 %) | 12 (63.2 %) | ||||
| Yes | NA | 20 (52.6 %) | 7 (36.8 %) | ||||
| Total tremor scores | NA | 25.58 ± 5.47 | 23.27 ± 8.20 | 0.364d | |||
| Purkinje cell counts | 10.52 ± 1.49 | 8.30 ± 1.92 | 9.34 ± 1.46 | <0.001b | <0.001c | 0.019 c | 0.030 c |
| Torpedo counts | 3.90 ± 3.28 | 17.43 ± 17.31 | 11.79 ± 7.57 | <0.001g | <0.001h | <0.001h | 0.445h |
| Median =3.00 |
Median =13.00 |
Median =9.00 | |||||
| Heterotopic Purkinje cell counts | 6.23 ± 11.45 | 7.23 ± 9.01 | 8.84 ± 9.70 | 0.035 g | 0.066h | 0.016 h | 0.261h |
| Median =2.00 |
Median =4.00 | Median =6.00 | |||||
| Hairy basket ratings | 1.57 ± 0.61 | 2.03 ± 0.85 | 1.95 ± 0.66 | 0.015 g | 0.006 h | 0.054h | 0.450h |
| Median =1.50 |
Median =2.00 | Median =2.00 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal recurrent collateral counts | 1.01 ± 1.16 | 1.81 ± 1.38 | 2.15 ± 2.10 | 0.023 g | 0.008 h | 0.093h | 0.930h |
| Median =0.60 |
Median =1.32 | Median =1.67 | |||||
| Purkinje cell thickened axonal profile counts | 0.96 ± 1.60 | 1.75 ± 2.52 | 1.76 ± 1.47 | 0.050 g | 0.026 h | 0.093h | 0.515h |
| Median =0.55 |
Median =1.09 | Median =1.29 | |||||
| Purkinje cell axonal branching counts | 0.09 ± 0.10 | 0.38 ± 0.43 | 0.32 ± 0.19 | 0.001 g | 0.001 h | 0.008 h | 0.815h |
| Median =0.07 |
Median =0.27 | Median =0.36 | |||||
Values represent mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage), and for variables with non-normal distribution, the median is reported as well. Mean number of Purkinje cell counts (PCs) per 100× microscopic field, among 15 sampled fields
NA not applicable
Missing head tremor information in one ET case
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD method) in one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Independent samples t test
Unknown in three ET cases
Chi-square test
Independent samples Kruskal-Wallis H test
Independent samples Mann-Whitney U test
Discussion
In this study, we found that early onset ET cases and late onset ET cases shared similar pathological changes in cerebellum. The mean age of onset is most commonly reported to be between 45 and 55 years in ET [27–33]; therefore, we chose an age of onset of 50 years as the cut-point in our primary analysis. However, the mean age of ET onset has been reported to differ considerably across studies, with some studies reporting a much younger age of onset [28, 34–37] while other studies reported older ages of onset [16, 38, 39]. Therefore, in two secondary analyses, we employed the alternative age cut-points of 40 and 60 years. Our results were the same.
Several studies have reported that early onset and late onset ET cases might have different clinical characteristics. Early onset ET cases more commonly have a family history of tremor whereas late onset ET cases might have a faster rate of tremor progression and a higher risk of dementia [16–19]. Our study showed that both early onset ET cases and late onset ET cases had similar cerebellar pathological changes, suggesting that both groups reached the same pathological endpoints at a similar age of death.
Age of onset is one of the major determinants of disease features and disease progression in neurological disorders. For example, early onset PD cases have a better response to levodopa treatment, more motor fluctuations, and a slower disease progression when compared to late onset PD cases [40]. On the other hand, both early onset and late onset PD cases reached the clinical disease milestones such as dementia and hallucinations at a similar age and had similar extent of pathologic alterations, regardless the age of PD onset [40]. These findings suggest that clinical presentations and acquisition of pathologic changes are modulated by aging-related mechanisms in the PD brain. This concept could be applied to ET as well.
ET cases with head tremor have more cerebellar involvement than ET cases without head tremor based on the structural imaging findings [41] and physiological characteristics [42]. We compared cerebellar pathological features in ET cases with and without head tremor. Interestingly, we found that ET cases with head tremor had lower PC counts than ET cases without head tremor; however, the two groups did not differ with respect to any of the other cerebellar pathological features (Table 6).
Muthuraman et al. [20], studied EEG coherence in ET and concluded that early onset ET cases had cerebellar involvement whereas late onset ET cases had no cerebellar involvement. However, in our current study, we found that both early onset and late onset ET cases had similar degree of degenerative changes in the cerebellum, and this was significantly different from controls.
A limitation of the current study is that we did not study pathological features in other relevant brain areas that are known to be connected to the cerebellar cortex and have been postulated as part of oscillatory loops, such as the inferior olivary nucleus. Nonetheless, we did not observe any morphological alterations in the inferior olivary nucleus in our previous study between ET cases and controls [43]; therefore, it is unlikely that we will discover the differences in this brain region in early vs. late onset ET cases. Another limitation is that we mainly studied the axonal compartment in the cerebellar cortex. Other synaptic pathology in the early vs. late onset ET cerebellum remains to be investigated [44, 45]. A third limitation is that we did not employ stereological methods for PC counts; nonetheless, we have previously validated PC counting with a random sampling approach [13]. A fourth limitation is that the disease duration is self-reported. Although age of onset is generally reported with high reliability by ET cases (rho =0.85, p < 0.001), in up to 20 % of cases, it is not. Furthermore, the validity of such reports is not known [46]. Our study had several strengths. First, we investigated a carefully diagnosed ET cohort. Second, we studied a broad range of pathological changes. Third, our sample size, of 90 brains, including 30 each with early and late onset ET, was considerable.
In conclusion, we did not find major pathological differences in the cerebellar cortex of early and late onset ET cases. These data do not support the notion that these age-of-onset related forms of ET represent distinct clinical-pathological entities.
Acknowledgments
Funding Dr. Kuo has received funding from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS #K08 NS083738 (principal investigator), and the Louis V. Gerstner Jr. Scholar Award, Parkinson’s Disease Foundation, and International Essential Tremor Foundation. Dr. Wang has received funding from the Jiangsu Government Scholarship for Overseas studies supported by Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education, China and the Key Discipline Development Project of Jiangsu Province, China (Nursing, Grant No. JX10617801). Dr. Louis has received research support from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS No. R01 NS042859 (principal investigator), NINDS No. R01 NS39422 (principal investigator), NINDS No. R01 NS086736 (principal investigator), NINDS No. R01 NS073872 (principal investigator), NINDS No. R01 NS085136 (principal investigator) and NINDS No. R01 NS088257 (principal investigator). He has also received support from the Claire O’Neil Essential Tremor Research Fund (Yale University). Dr. Faust has received funding from the National Institutes of Health: NINDS No. R21 NS077094 (principal investigator) and NINDS No. R01 NS39422 (principal investigator).
Footnotes
Author’s Contribution List all authors along with their specific roles in the project and preparation of the manuscript. These may include but are not restricted to: (1) research project: A. conception, B. organization, C. execution; (2) statistical analysis: A. design, B. execution, C. review and critique; (3) manuscript: A. writing of the first draft, B. review and critique.
Sheng-Han Kuo: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A
Jie Wang: 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3B
William Tate: 1C, 3B
Ming-Kai Pan: 1C, 3B
Geoffrey Kelly: 1C, 3B
Jesus Gutierrez: 1C, 3B
Phyllis Faust: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B
Elan Louis: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3B.
Compliance with Ethical Standard
Disclosure The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25:534–41. doi: 10.1002/mds.22838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sharifi S, Nederveen AJ, Booij J, van Rootselaar AF. Neuroimaging essentials in essential tremor: a systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2014;5:217–31. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dupuis MJ-M, Evrard FLA, Jacquerye PG, Picard GR, Lermen OG. Disappearance of essential tremor after stroke. Mov Disord. 2010;25:2884–7. doi: 10.1002/mds.23328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Marin-Lahoz J, Gironell A. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: neurochemical evidence. Cerebellum. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0735-z. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Benito-León J, Labiano-Fontcuberta A. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: clinical evidence. Cerebellum. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0741-1. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Filip P, Lungu OV, Manto MU, Bareš M. Linking essential tremor to the cerebellum: physiological evidence. Cerebellum. 2015 doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0740-2. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Rajput A, Robinson CA, et al. Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls. Brain. 2007;130:3297–307. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Babij R, Lee M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JPG, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell axonal anatomy: quantifying morphometric changes in essential tremor versus control brains. Brain. 2013;136:3051–61. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuo SH, Erickson-Davis C, Gillman A, Faust PL, Vonsattel JPG, Louis ED. Increased number of heterotopic Purkinje cells in essential tremor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:1038–40. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.213330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Erickson-Davis CR, Faust PL, Vonsattel JPG, Gupta S, Honig LS, Louis ED. Hairy baskets associated with degenerative Purkinje cell changes in essential tremor. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69:262–71. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181d1ad04. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuo SH, Tang G, Louis ED, Ma K, Babji R, Balatbat M, et al. Lingo-1 expression is increased in essential tremor cerebellum and is present in the basket cell pinceau. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125:879–89. doi: 10.1007/s00401-013-1108-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Louis ED, Babij R, Lee M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JPG. Quantification of cerebellar hemispheric Purkinje cell linear density: 32 ET cases versus 16 controls. Mov Disord. 2013;28:1854–9. doi: 10.1002/mds.25629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Choe M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JPG, Kuo SH, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell loss in essential tremor: random sampling quantification and nearest neighbor analysis. Mov Disord. 2016 doi: 10.1002/mds.26490. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Symanski C, Shill HA, Dugger B, Hentz JG, Adler CH, Jacobson SA, et al. Essential tremor is not associated with cerebellar Purkinje cell loss. Mov Disord. 2014;29:496–500. doi: 10.1002/mds.25845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rajput AH, Robinson CA, Rajput ML, Robinson SL, Rajput A. Essential tremor is not dependent upon cerebellar Purkinje cell loss. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:626–8. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Deuschl G, Petersen I, Lorenz D, Christensen K. Tremor in the elderly: essential and aging-related tremor. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1327–34. doi: 10.1002/mds.26265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Louis ED, Ford B, Barnes LF. Clinical subtypes of essential tremor. Arch Neurol. 2000;57:1194–8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.8.1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Louis ED, Benito-León J, Ottman R, Bermejo-Pareja F, Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) Study Group A population-based study of mortality in essential tremor. A Neurology. 2007;69:1982–9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000279339.87987.d7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED, Benito-León J, Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) Study Group Risk of incident dementia in essential tremor: a population-based study. Mov Disord. 2007;22:1573–80. doi: 10.1002/mds.21553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Muthuraman M, Deuschl G, Anwar AR, Mideksa KG, Helmolt von F, Schneider SA. Essential and aging-related tremor: differences of central control. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1673–80. doi: 10.1002/mds.26410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Louis ED, Ottman R, Ford B, Pullman S, Martinez M, Fahn S, Hauser WA. The Washington Heights-Inwood genetic study of essential tremor: methodologic issues in essential-tremor research. Neuroepidemiology. 1997;16:124–33. doi: 10.1159/000109681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Harasymiw JW, Bean P. Identification of heavy drinkers by using the early detection of alcohol consumption score. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2001;25:228–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Braak H, Braak E. Diagnostic criteria for neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S85–8. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112:389–404. doi: 10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mirra SS. The CERAD neuropathology protocol and consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: a commentary. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:S91–4. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(97)00058-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Louis ED, Babij R, Ma K, Cortes E, Vonsattel JPG. Essential tremor followed by progressive supranuclear palsy: postmortem reports of 11 patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2013;72:8–17. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31827ae56e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Louis ED, Dogu O. Does age of onset in essential tremor have a bimodal distribution? Data from a tertiary referral setting and a population-based study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29:208–12. doi: 10.1159/000111584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lou JS, Jankovic J. Essential tremor: clinical correlates in 350 patients. Neurology. 1991;41:234–8. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.2_part_1.234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Koller WC, Busenbark K, Miner K. The relationship of essential tremor to other movement disorders: report on 678 patients. Essential Tremor Study Group. Ann Neurol. 1994;35:717–23. doi: 10.1002/ana.410350613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Louis ED, Gerbin M, Galecki M. Essential tremor 10, 20, 30, 40: clinical snapshots of the disease by decade of duration. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20:949–54. doi: 10.1111/ene.12123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Louis ED, Michalec M. Reduced body mass index in essential tremor: a study of 382 cases and 392 matched controls. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22:384–8. doi: 10.1111/ene.12589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Henchcliffe C, Pahwa R, et al. Older onset essential tremor: more rapid progression and more degenerative pathology. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1606–12. doi: 10.1002/mds.22570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Louis ED, Clark LN, Ottman R. Familial versus sporadic essential tremor: what patterns can one decipher in age of onset? Neuroepidemiology. 2015;44:166–72. doi: 10.1159/000381807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Louis ED, Agnew A, Gillman A, Gerbin M, Viner AS. Estimating annual rate of decline: prospective, longitudinal data on arm tremor severity in two groups of essential tremor cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry BMJ. 2011;82:761–5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.229740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Louis ED, Michalec M. Semi-quantitative data on ethanol consumption in 354 ET cases and 370 controls. J Neurol Sci. 2014;347:174–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.09.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Louis ED, Michalec M, Gillman A. Shaky drawing: what is the rate of decline during prospective follow-up of essential tremor? BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gironell A, Ribosa-Nogué R, Gich I, Marin-Lahoz J, Pascual-Sedano B. Severity stages in essential tremor: a long-term retrospective study using the glass scale. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2015;5:299. doi: 10.7916/D8DV1HQC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shill HA, Hentz JG, Jacobson SA, Belden C, Sabbagh MN, Beach TG, et al. Essential tremor in the elderly and risk for dementia. J Neurodegener Dis. 2014:328765–328765. doi: 10.1155/2014/328765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Rajput AH, Offord KP, Beard CM, Kurland LT. Essential tremor in Rochester, Minnesota: a 45-year study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984;47:466–70. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.5.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kempster PA, Williams DR, Selikhova M, Holton J, Revesz T, Lees AJ. Patterns of levodopa response in Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study. Brain. 2007;130:2123–8. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Quattrone A, Cerasa A, Messina D, Nicoletti G, Hagberg GE, Lemieux L, Novellino F, Lanza P, Arabia G, Salsone M. Essential head tremor is associated with cerebellar vermis atrophy: a volumetric and voxel-based morphometry MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:1692–7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bares M, Lungu OV, Husárová I, Gescheidt T. Predictive motor timing performance dissociates between early diseases of the cerebellum and Parkinson’s disease. Cerebellum. 2010;9:124–35. doi: 10.1007/s12311-009-0133-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Louis ED, Babij R, Cortes E, Vonsattel JPG, Faust PL. The inferior olivary nucleus: a postmortem study of essential tremor cases versus controls. Mov Disord. 2013;28:779–86. doi: 10.1002/mds.25400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Lin CY, Louis ED, Faust PL, Koeppen AH, Vonsattel JPG, Kuo SH. Abnormal climbing fibre-Purkinje cell synaptic connections in the essential tremor cerebellum. Brain. 2014;137:3149–59. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Louis RJ, Lin CY, Faust PL, Koeppen AH, Kuo SH. Climbing fiber synaptic changes correlate with clinical features in essential tremor. Neurology. 2015;84:2284–6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Louis ED. Age of onset: can we rely on essential tremor patients to report this? Data from a prospective, longitudinal study. Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40:93–8. doi: 10.1159/000341903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
