Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Jun 20;50(13):7095–7105. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b06294

Peroxymonosulfate Rapidly Inactivates the Disease-associated Prion Protein

Alexandra R Chesney 1, Clarissa J Booth 1,, Christopher B Lietz 2, Lingjun Li 1,2,3, Joel A Pedersen 1,2,4,*
PMCID: PMC5337124  NIHMSID: NIHMS836075  PMID: 27247993

Abstract

Prions, the etiological agents in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, exhibit remarkable resistance to most methods of inactivation that are effective against conventional pathogens. Prions are composed of pathogenic conformers of the prion protein (PrPTSE). Some prion diseases are transmitted, in part, through environmental routes. The recalcitrance of prions to inactivation may lead to a persistent reservoir of infectivity that contributes to the environmental maintenance of epizootics. At present, few methods exist to remediate prion-contaminated lands. Here we examined the ability of peroxymonosulfate to degrade PrPTSE as an initial step toward developing an in situ chemical oxidation process to inactivate prions. We find that peroxymonosulfate rapidly degrades PrPTSE from two species. Transition metal-catalyzed decomposition of peroxymonosulfate to produce sulfate radicals appears to enhance degradation. We further demonstrate that exposure to peroxymonosulfate significantly reduced PrPC-to-PrPTSE converting ability as measured by protein misfolding cyclic amplification, used as a proxy for infectivity. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry revealed that exposure to peroxymonosulfate results in oxidative modifications to methionine and tryptophan residues. This study indicates that peroxymonosulfate may hold promise for in situ remediation of prion-contaminated surfaces.

Keywords: Chronic wasting disease, scrapie, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, oxone, in situ chemical oxidation

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name nihms836075u1.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Prions are the etiological agents of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs) or prion diseases.1,2 Prion diseases are a group of fatal, neurodegenerative disorders affecting a number of mammalian species including humans (kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease), sheep and goats (scrapie), cattle (bovine spongiform encephalopathy; “mad cow” disease), and North American members of the deer family (chronic wasting disease; CWD). Prions appear to be composed primarily, if not solely of misfolded conformers (PrPTSE) of the host-encoded cellular prion protein (PrPC).1,2 The central molecular event in prion diseases is the conformational conversion of PrPC into PrPTSE,1,3 which induces profound changes in the biophysical properties of the protein. Whereas PrPC is primarily α-helical, detergent soluble and labile with respect to proteolysis, PrPTSE exhibits high β-sheet content, is largely insoluble in water and most detergents, and displays remarkable resistance to a variety of chemical and physical inactivation methods.47 Treatments that are effective for inactivating conventional microbial pathogens (e.g., boiling, ultraviolet irradiation, ethanol, formalin, conventional autoclaving) do not eliminate prion infectivity.8 Sterilization procedures recommended by the World Health Organization include > 1 h exposure to 1 N sodium hydroxide or 2% sodium hypochlorite, or autoclaving in 1 N sodium hydroxide at 121 °C for 30 min.8

Chronic wasting disease of North American members of the deer family (cervids) and scrapie in sheep and goats are spread in part via environmental reservoirs of prion infectivity.9 Past studies indicate that indirect transmission via environmental routes may play a important role in the long-term dynamics of CWD in North America.10 Infected animals shed prions in feces, urine, and saliva.1115 Prion infectivity can persist in the environment for years.13,1618 The persistence of prions in the environment is attributed to the intrinsic stability of PrPTSE fibrils and may be enhanced by association with soil constituents,1921 one explanation invoked for the preservation of intrinsically labile organic matter.22,23

Remediation of prion-contaminated lands poses a challenge; decontamination methods that have been demonstrated to be effective in inactivating prions are difficult to apply in the environment.24 Several oxidants used for in situ chemical oxidation of recalcitrant organic contaminants2529 have been investigated for their ability to degrade PrPTSE including hydrogen peroxide,30 ozone,3133 permanganate,3436 and the Fenton reagent.3739 Table 1 provides a summary of selected studies that have demonstrated the ability of oxidants to inactivate prions. Most oxidants investigated to date are either insufficiently effective against prions (e.g., H2O2, permanganate) or possess features that may limit their utility for application to soils (e.g., the gaseous nature of O3, low pH needed for optimal application of Fenton reagent). Peroxymonosulfate (HSO5) has been investigated for in situ chemical oxidation,4043 but has not previously been investigated for its ability to inactivate prions. Peroxymonosulfate is a monosubstituted derivative of H2O2 that is less prone to spontaneous decomposition in water than hydrogen peroxide and is frequently more reactive than H2O2 kinetically despite having only a slightly higher standard reduction potential (EH0 (HSO5/HSO4) = +1.82 V vs. EH0 (H2O2/H2O) = +1.776 V).4446 Peroxymonosulfate is reactive over a broad pH range, but its stability declines as pKa,2 is approached (9.9 at 20 °C).47,48 Peroxymonosulfate can oxidize organic moieties including acetals to alcohols,49 alkenes to ketones,50 sulfides to sulfones,51 and phosphines to phosphine oxides.52

Table 1.

Inactivation of prions by chemical oxidants

Oxidant Concentration (mM) Contact Time (min) Reduction in Infectivity log10 Ref.
HOCl 19b 30 4.4 36
O3 0.3 (pH 4.4, 4 °C) 5 >4.1 33
Fenton(-like) reagent (·OH) [H2O2] = 100, [Cu2+] = 0.5 30 >5.2 100
[H2O2] = 2131, [Fe2+] = 15.8 (50 °C) 1320 >6 39
Heterogeneous photocatalysis (·OH) [H2O2] = 118, [TiO2]s = 50 720 ND 101
HSO5 125 60 ≥5.9c this study
H2O2 1279 1, 24 0.84 36
permanganate 253–506 15, 60 1, 2–2.3 35
6.3 15, 60, 1440 0.51, 1.17, 0.84 36
δ-MnO2(s) 102 (pH 4) 960 >4c 35, 105
a

ND, not determined.

b

Attributing all free residual chlorine to HOCl.

c

Based on reduction of template-directed conversion ability as measured by PMCA.

Peroxymonosulfate can be activated thermally,45 radiolytically,53 photolytically (λ < 419 nm),54 and in the presence of transition metals to produce sulfate radical (SO4·).41,5557 Much previous work with peroxymonosulfate used Co(II) to catalytically decompose peroxymonosulfate to SO4·−.4043,54,57,58 The estimated standard reduction potential of SO4·, EH0 (SO4· /SO42−), is 2.5 to 3.1 V,59 similar to or higher than that for hydroxyl radical (·OH; EH0 (·OH/H2O) = 2.59 or 2.7 V).60 The reduction potential for sulfate radical does not vary with pH for proton activities typical of the environment while that for hydroxyl radical does, making the formal potential of SO4· larger than that of ·OH at pH > 3.4 (assuming EH0(SO4· /SO42−) and EH0 (·OH/H2O) are 2.5 V and 2.7 V, respectively; all activities unity other than that for protons). Cobalt-activated peroxymonosulfate has been employed to treat diesel-contaminated soil,40 polychlorinated biphenyls,61 atrazine,54 and landfill leachates.62 Activated peroxymonosulfate can degrade peptidic cyanobacterial toxins63 and some amino acids.64 The ability of (activated) peroxymonosulfate to inactivate prions has not been previously reported.

The objectives of this study were to determine the extent to which peroxymonosulfate degrades and inactivates pathogenic prion protein unaided, and when activated by cobalt. To achieve these objectives we used immunoblotting to investigate degradation of PrPTSE from white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; CWD agent) and golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus; HY agent) by (Co(II)-activated) peroxymonosulfate as a function of time and peroxymonosulfate concentration. We used protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) to examine (activated) peroxymonosulfate-induced reductions in the PrPC-to-PrPTSE converting ability of prions as a proxy for infectivity. We investigated modifications to the primary structure of PrPTSE due to exposure to (activated) peroxymonosulfate by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

EXPERIMENTAL

Prion protein sources

Hamster-adapted transmissible mink encephalopathy agent (HY strain) and cervid (CWD) agent were obtained from brain tissue of experimentally inoculated Syrian golden hamsters and an experimentally inoculated white-tailed deer,65 respectively. Animals were cared for in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Wisconsin – Madison (Assurance Number 3464-01). Brain tissue was homogenized in 1× Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS; 137 mM NaCl, 8.1 mM NaHPO42−, 1.47 mM H2PO4; pH 7), and the resultant 10% (w/v) brain homogenate (BH) was stored at −80 °C until use. When elimination of PrPC was needed, BH was treated with 50 μg·mL−1 PK (final concentration) for 1 h at 37 °C. Proteinase K activity was halted by addition of PMSF to a final concentration of 4 mM. Some experiments were conducted with purified HY PrPTSE, wherein the P4 pellet was isolated from eight hamster brains following the procedure of Bolton et al.3 as modified by McKenzie et al.66 The P4 pellet was resuspended in 1× DPBS, pH 7.4. Total protein concentration in the purified preparation was measured using a BCA protein assay (Pierce), and PrPTSE concentrations were estimated to be > 90% of total protein.20 Purified, full-length (23–230) recombinant murine PrP (residues 23–231, lacking a Histag) in the α-helix-rich conformation (α-mo-recPrP) was acquired from Prionatis AG (RPA0101, Alpnach Dorf, Switzerland).

Reaction of peroxymonosulfate with prions

Pathogenic prion protein, either in the form of purified preparation (HY strain) or 10% BH (HY or CWD strains) was mixed with solutions of peroxymonosulfate and/or CoCl2 under the conditions indicated in the Results and Discussion. All concentrations presented for peroxymonosulfate, CoCl2, and quenching agents reflect final concentrations. The molar ratio of peroxymonosulfate to CoCl2 was 125:3 unless otherwise specified. All experiments were conducted at room temperature (~25 °C) in polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes in the dark. Some experiments employed α-mo-recPrP. Reactions with peroxymonosulfate and/or CoCl2 were halted by addition of an equal volume of 0.5 M sodium thiosulfate (unless otherwise specified). In some cases, samples were pre-treated with sodium thiosulfate to prevent oxidation by peroxymonosulfate and radical species. All experiments were conducted in triplicate unless otherwise specified. Final solution pH of peroxymonosulfate was stable at approximately 1.5. For experiments with α-mo-recPrP pH was controlled by preparing peroxymonosulfate solutions in 100 mM phosphate and brought to the desired pH with 0.1 M NaOH or 0.1 M H2SO4.

Immunoblot detection of PrPTSE

Following treatment, PrPTSE samples were prepared for SDS-PAGE as previously described.67 Briefly, a 20 μL aliquot was removed from the reaction vessel and mixed with 10 μL of 10× SDS sample buffer (100 mM Tris; pH 8, 10% SDS, 7.5 mM EDTA, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 30% glycerol). Samples were then heated at 100 °C for 10 min and fractionated on 12% bis-tris polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen). Proteins were electrotransferred from the gel to a 0.45 μm polyvinyl difluoride membrane (Millipore). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk (prepared in 1× Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20) overnight at 4 °C. Membrane-bound hamster PrP was probed with monoclonal antibody 3F4 (Covance, 1:40,000 dilution; epitope: 109–112) or SAF83 (Cayman Chemical, 1:200, epitope: 126–164). Cervid PrP and murine recPrP were probed with monoclonal antibodies 8G8 (Cayman Chemical, 1:1000, epitope: 97–102) and Bar224 (Cayman Chemical, 1:10000, epitope: 141–151). Primary antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (BioRad, 1:10,000 dilution) and Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce Biotechnology). Densitometric analysis of immunoblot bands was conducted using Image J Software.

Protein misfolding cyclic amplification

Bead-assisted protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) was conducted following the methods of Johnson et al.,68 adapted to a microplate format69 and designated mbPMCA. Detection of CWD prions was achieved using PrPC in normal brain homogenate from uninfected transgenic mice hemizygous for the cervid prion gene (Tg(CerPrP)1535± mice)70 as substrate for the PMCA reaction. Mice were euthanized by CO2 asphyxiation and immediately perfused with 1× modified DPBS without Ca2+ or Mg2+ (Thermo Scientific, amended with 5 mM EDTA). Brains were rapidly removed, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use. Brain tissue was homogenized on ice to 10% (w/v) in PMCA conversion buffer (Ca2+- and Mg2+-free DPBS supplemented with 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.05% saponin (Mallinckrodt), 5 mM EDTA, and 1 tablet Roche Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitors cocktail (Fisher) per 50 mL conversion buffer). Brain homogenates were clarified by centrifugation (2 min, 2,000g). Supernatant was transferred to pre-chilled microcentrifuge tubes, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use.

Seeds for mbPMCA were prepared from CWD-positive white-tailed deer brain tissue by serially diluting 10% BH (made up in DPBS) five-fold in normal brain homogenate (NBH) to generate a dilution series. Sample dilutions were used to seed 36 μL NBH (4 μL seed) in 96-well PCR microplate (Axygen, Union City, CA, USA) with one 2.38 mm Teflon® bead (McMaster-Carr, #9660K12). Experimental plates were placed in a rack in a Misonix S-4000 microplate horn, and the reservoir was filled with ultrapure water. Each round of mbPMCA consisted of 96 cycles (30 s sonication at 40–60% of maximum power, 1770 s incubation at 37 °C). At the completion of 96 cycles, new NBH was reseeded with 4 μL of the reaction product for serial mbPMCA. After completing the last round of mbPMCA, 20 μL of each sample was PK digested (50 μg·mL−1, 1 h, 37 °C) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE with immunoblot detection (vide supra).

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

To prepare samples for LC-MS/MS analysis, we exposed ~2.4 μg of HY PrPTSE (PK-treated purified preparation) with 9.6 mM peroxymonosulfate in the absence or presence of 230 μM CoCl2 for 15 or 60 min. At the end of the exposure, samples were quenched with an equal volume of 0.5 M sodium thiosulfate, and the total sample volume (~26 μL) was dried down using a SpeedVac (Thermo Scientific). To achieve high sequence coverage in LC-MS/MS analysis, samples were digested with multiple proteases: samples were digested by a combination of endoprotease Lys-C and trypsin (which cleaves C-terminal to lysine and arginine), or by chymotrypsin (which cleaves C-terminal to tryptophan, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and leucine) as detailed in the SI. Dry pellets were resuspended in 20 μL of 8 M urea (in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8) and sonicated for 30 s. Cysteine residues were reduced and alkylated as outlined in the SI.

Peptides were extracted and desalted using 100 μL reversed-phase C18 Omix SPE pipette tips (Agilent Technologies) following manufacturer recommendations and dried down using a SpeedVac (Thermo Scientific). The sample was then resuspended in 0.1% formic acid (prepared in LCMS grade water). The peptide fragments were analyzed on a nanoAcquity UPLC (Waters Corp.) with an integrated nano-electrospray ionization (nESI) emitter. Upon elution from the column, sample was electrosprayed into the nESI source of an Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher). The selected ions were isolated and fragmented individually, and each fragmentation spectrum was recorded. Samples were prepared in two technical replicates and analyzed in duplicate by LC-MS/MS. Details on the method and subsequent data analysis are described in the SI.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Peroxymonosulfate rapidly degrades pathogenic prion protein

Prion strains exhibit different susceptibilities to inactivation methods.71,72 We therefore examined the ability of peroxymonosulfate to degrade PrPTSE from two prion strains: laboratory model strain HY and an environmentally relevant CWD strain. We exposed 10% HY brain homogenate, purified HY preparation or 10% CWD brain homogenate to 125 mM peroxymonosulfate for 60 min. Peroxymonosulfate reactions were quenched with up to 1 M Na2S2O3. (This concentration of Na2S2O3 did not affect detection of PrPTSE by immunoblotting; Figure S1.) Densitometry values from the resulting immunoblots are presented in Figure 1A (inset) relative to the control (PrPTSE in ultrapure water). Following a 1-h treatment with peroxymonosulfate, immunoreactivity of all forms of PrPTSE was reduced to ≤ 13% of control (i.e., 13 ± 1%, 8 ± 3%, and 8 ± 2% of control immunoblot intensity for HY BH, HY prep, and CWD BH, respectively). The reproducibility of PrPTSE immunoblots was consistent with that of general protein immunoblotting, in which errors associated with quantitative comparisons are often ≥ 10%.73 The results described here for HY were obtained using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) 3F4 and SAF83 (SI), which bind to non-overlapping residues 109–112 and 126–164 respectively in hamster PrP; immunoblots for CWD were probed with mAbs 8G8 and Bar224, which are directed against residues 97–102 and 141–151, respectively, of deer PrP (epitopes are mapped onto a molecular model for PrPTSE in Figure S2).74 The results in Figure 1A (inset) indicate that HSO5 either induced alteration of at least two separate antibody epitopes in PrP (fragments) from each species or fragmented the protein so extensively that the fragments were not retained on the gel (i.e., fragment molecular mass ≤ 10 kDa) or both. All epitopes probed contain easily oxidizable amino acid residues (i.e., histidine (H), tryptophan (W), and tyrosine (Y), and methionine (M).75 The cervid and hamster prion proteins both contain 42 easily oxidizable residues spaced approximately evenly throughout the protein (Figure S3), leading to the expectation of oxidation of residues throughout the protein. These results demonstrate that peroxymonosulfate is able to degrade pathogenic prion protein from two different prion strains (HY and CWD) and furthermore, that this degradation can occur even in the presence of a large excess of other biomolecules (e.g., other proteins, nucleic acids, lipids, glycans in brain homogenate).7678

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Peroxymonosulfate degrades pathogenic prion protein in the absence of transition metal cations. (A) CWD BH (10% wt/vol) was incubated with between 0 and 150 mM peroxymonosulfate for 30 min. Substantial degradation of PrPTSE was seen at 50 mM. (Inset) Peroxymonosulfate substantially degrades CWD and HY prions (PrPTSE (10% HY BH (15 μL), purified HY preparation (0.5 μg) or 10% CWD BH (15 μL) was incubated with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate for 1 h. (B) Immunoblot detection of PrPTSE was substantially reduced after 5 min when exposed to 125 mM peroxymonosulfate, and after 15–30 min when exposed to 25 mM peroxymonosulfate. All immunoblot detection was eliminated when PrPTSE was exposed to both concentrations after 1-h incubation. PrPTSE (15 μL 10% CWD BH) was incubated with between 0 and up to 150 mM for 30 min. Immunoblot densitometry values normalized to PrPTSE in ultrapure water (n = 4). Error bars represent standard deviations of experimental triplicates. Immunoblots were probed with mAb 3F4 (HY) or mAb 8G8/Bar224 (CWD). Error bars represent one standard deviation.

We investigated the concentration-dependence of PrPTSE degradation by peroxymonosulfate by incubating PrPTSE (10% CWD brain homogenate) with a range of peroxymonosulfate concentrations for 30 min at a constant ratio of 125:3. Immunoblot band intensity for CWD PrPTSE was significantly reduced at peroxymonosulfate concentrations ≥ 25 mM (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1A). These data suggest that substantial PrPTSE degradation (≥ 75%) is achieved within 30 min at 25 mM peroxymonosulfate.

We then examined the kinetics of PrPTSE degradation by peroxymonosulfate at two concentrations. We added 15 μL 10% BH (CWD) to ultrapure water, or 25 or 125 mM peroxymonosulfate for 1 to 60 min (Figure 1B). Immunoreactivity of CWD PrPTSE was diminished after 5 min incubation (p <0.01) with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate, and after 15 min incubation, CWD PrPTSE was substantially reduced, and in some replicates, no longer detectable. Contact with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate for durations exceeding 1 min significantly reduced immunoreactivity compared to controls (p <0.01). In contrast, contact with 25 mM peroxymonosulfate did not result in significantly reduced band intensity until 15 min exposure (p <0.01). At both peroxymonosulfate concentrations, CWD PrPTSE immunoreactivity was undetectable after 60 min exposure (Figure 1B, p <0.01).

To gain further insight into the degradation of PrPTSE achieved by exposure to HSO5 we imaged protein aggregates from purified prion preparations79 by TEM (Methods in SI) after 10, 30, and 60 min and 24 h exposure to 50 mM peroxymonosulfate (Figure S4). The control (unexposed) and samples exposed for 10 min exhibited definitive rod-like structures characteristic of pathogenic prion protein fibrils. Samples exposed to HSO5 for longer time periods had fewer fibril-like structures; the 24 h exposure showed no discernable structures. These data indicate that peroxymonosulfate extensively altered prion protein aggregates.

Peroxymonosulfate degrades recombinant prion protein in the absence of transition metal catalysts

Peroxymonosulfate is a strong oxidant capable of direct oxidation of primary amines, alkenes, azides, and sulfides in aqueous solution without activation to form radical species.80,81 The results presented above indicate that peroxymonosulfate can degrade PrPTSE in brain homogenate and in purified preparations without addition by an exogenous transition metal (i.e., cobalt) to activate HSO5. Brain homogenate and purified PrPTSE preparations contain transition metals (e.g., iron, copper)82,83 that can activate HSO5−.56,8486 For example, ~2.4 μg Cu2+ per mg PrPTSE has been estimated to be present in brain tissue of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease patients.83 The benign, normal form of the prion protein, PrPC, associates with copper with a binding stoichiometry of approximately two copper atoms per PrP molecule under physiologically relevant conditions;82 the binding stoichiometry of PrPTSE has not been worked out, however some replacement of copper by manganese and zinc has been reported.83,87

We sought to establish whether HSO5 could transform prion protein in the absence of transition metals that might activate peroxymonosulfate to produce radical species. To do this we used α-mo-recPrP because available sources of PrPTSE were expected to include transition metals. We incubated ~15 ng of α-mo-recPrP with 12.5 mM peroxymonosulfate in the absence and presence of 300 μM cupric chloride (CuCl2) for 1 h, and quenched the reaction at the end of the incubation period or pre-treated samples with 50 mM Na2S2O3. Recombinant prion proteins are typically purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography, and His-tagged proteins purified in this manner may contain transition metal contaminants.88 To exclude this possibility, we used α-mo-recPrP not bearing a His-tag. Under the experimental conditions employed, exposure to HSO5 completely eliminated α-mo-recPrP immunoreactivity (Figure S5) indicating that activation of peroxymonosulfate to form radical species was not prerequisite to degrade prion protein. Exposure to peroxymonosulfate + CuCl2 also eliminated α-mo-recPrP immunoreactivity. Pre-treatment of samples with sodium thiosulfate prevented loss of α-mo-recPrP immunoreactivity in treatments of peroxymonosulfate with and without CuCl2 (S5). These results indicate that peroxymonosulfate can directly oxidize prion protein without metal activation.

Cobalt accelerates degradation of pathogenic prion protein exposed to peroxymonosulfate

We next assessed whether activation of peroxymonosulfate by Co(II) accelerates degradation of PrPTSE. We incubated 10% HY brain homogenate, purified HY preparation or 10% CWD brain homogenate with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate and 3 mM CoCl2 for 60 min and found immunoreactivity to be diminished to 5 ± 0.3%, 3 ± 1%, and 2 ± 1% of control (identical to treatments except that HSO5 was excluded), respectively (Figure 2A, inset). Examination of the concentration-dependence of Co(II)-activated peroxymonosulfate transformation of PrPTSE (10% CWD brain homogenate) revealed substantial decrease immunoreactivity at 25 mM HSO5 by 30 min exposure (Figure 2A); in contrast, substantial degradation by peroxymonosulfate without added CoCl2 was not observed at concentrations below 50 mM HSO5 for this exposure period (Figure 1A). Exposure of PrPTSE to 125 mM HSO5 in the absence or presence of CoCl2 resulted in elimination of immunoreactivity by 15 min (Figure 1B and 2B). When PrPTSE was exposed to 25 mM HSO5 in the presence of 600 μM CoCl2, immunoblot band intensity was substantially reduced after 15 min (p = 0.0013) and completely eliminated at longer exposure times (Figure 2B). In the absence of cobalt, equivalent PrPTSE degradation required longer exposure (1 h, Figure 1B). These data demonstrate that addition of cobalt enhances the effectiveness of PrPTSE degradation by peroxymonosulfate.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Activation of HSO5 by CoCl2 enhances degradation of PrPTSE. (A) CWD BH (10% wt/vol) was incubated with between 0 and 150 mM peroxymonosulfate in the presence of CoCl2 (125:3 molar ratio) for 30 min. Substantial degradation of PrPTSE was seen at 25 mM. (Inset) Peroxymonosulfate activated by CoCl2 substantially degrades CWD and HY prions. PrPTSE (10% HY BH (15 μL), purified HY preparation (0.5 μg) or 10% CWD BH (15 μL) was incubated with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate for 1 h. (B) Immunoblot detection of PrPTSE was substantially reduced after 5 min when exposed to 125 mM peroxymonosulfate with 3 mM CoCl2, and after 15 min when exposed to 25 mM peroxymonosulfate with 600 mM CoCl2. All immunoblot detection was eliminated when PrPTSE was exposed to both concentrations after 30 min incubation. Error bars represent standard deviations of experimental triplicates. Immunoblots were probed with mAb 3F4 (HY) or mAb 8G8/Bar224 (CWD). Immunoblot densitometry values normalized to PrPTSE in ultrapure water (n = 4). Error bars represent one standard deviation.

The experiments described above used a 125:3 molar ratio of HSO5 to Co2+. This ratio is within ranges reported for optimal degradation of diesel-contaminated soil and 2,4-dichlorophenol.57,40 We investigated the effect of the HSO5-to-CoCl2 ratio on degradation at constant HSO5 concentrations of 25 and 125 mM and found no difference (p > 0.05) in the extent of degradation after 20 min for HSO5-to-CoCl2 ratios between 10:1 and 100:1; after 1 h, immunoreactivity was no longer detectable for these treatments (data not shown).

Formation of sulfate and hydroxyl radicals is not necessary for rapid degradation of PrPTSE

Activation of peroxymonosulfate by transition metals produces sulfate and hydroxyl radicals. To assess whether the formation of either of these radical species was required for the rapid transformation of PrPTSE, we employed ethanol and tert-butyl alcohol as radical quenchers in exposures of PrPTSE to peroxymonosulfate with or without added CoCl2. Ethanol reacts rapidly with hydroxyl and sulfate radicals (·OH: k′ = 1.2 to 2.8 × 109 M−1s−1; SO4·: k′ = 1.6 to 7.7 × 107 M−1s−1),41,56,60,89,90 quenching reactions with these radicals. (We note that ethanol also quenches chloride radical (Cl·), k′ = 1 × 109 M−1s−1).91 In contrast, the second-order rate constant for tert-butyl alcohol reaction with ·OH (k′ = 3.8 to 7.6 × 108 M−1s−1) is three orders of magnitude larger than that for SO4· (k′ = 4.0 to 9.1 × 105 M−1s−1),60,90 allowing it to be used to discriminate between the two radical species.43,56

We exposed PrPTSE (10% CWD brain homogenate) to 25 mM PMS ± 600 μM CoCl2 for 5 min, and either quenched at the end of the incubation period with Na2S2O3 or pre-treated samples with 17.1 M ethanol or 10.4 M tert-butyl alcohol (molar ratios of 684:1 and 416:1 for ethanol- and tert-butyl alcohol-to-HSO5, respectively). Degradation of PrPTSE proceeded with sufficient rapidity to abolish detectable immunoreactivity within 5 min in the presence of the alcohol quenchers (Figure S6). This result indicates that the formation of hydroxyl or sulfate (or chloride) radicals is not requisite for rapid transformation of PrPTSE. The species responsible for transformation of PrPTSE may be HSO5 itself. Peroxymonosulfate is not quenched by ethanol and has been shown to transform all common proteinogenic amino acids investigated (cysteine not tested) with the largest pseudo-first-order rate constants for methionine, tryptophan, tyrosine and histidine.92 A second possibility is peroxymonosulfate radical (SO5·), a species formed from the oxidation of peroxymonosulfate by either sulfate radical or hydroxyl radical.92 The second-order rate constant for SO5· reaction with ethanol (k′EtOH,SO5·– < 103 M−1·s−1) is small compared to that of sulfate radical or hydroxyl radical (k′EtOH,i > 107 M−1·s−1, i = SO4· or ·OH),59,60,89 making ethanol an inefficient quencher of reactions with this radical.

Interestingly, for samples exposed to peroxymonosulfate alone, pre-exposure of PrPTSE to ethanol or tert-butyl alcohol appeared to enhance degradation (compare lanes 9 and 12 with lane 3 in Figure S6). This result may be attributable to partial denaturation of the protein by the alcohol, allowing HSO5 access to more of the structure. Ethanol can induce (partial) unfolding of proteins in a concentration-dependent manner.93 Increased branching of the hydrocarbon portion of alcohols generally reduces their effectiveness in denaturing proteins making tert-butyl alcohol a less effective denaturant than ethanol.93

Effect of peroxymonosufate on the in vitro converting ability of PrPTSE

The biochemical data presented thus far demonstrate that exposure to peroxymonosulfate in the absence or presence of Co2+ effects substantial degradation of PrPTSE. The detection method employed (immunoblotting) has two limitations that are important for assessing the effectiveness of HSO5 for inactivating prions: (1) immunoblotting has detection limit (~4 ng PrP) that is orders of magnitude higher than the amount of PrPTSE required to initiate disease (for mice, 725,000 times less sensitive than intracerebral inoculation);94 and (2) declines in immunoreactivity do not always parallel reductions in prion infectivity.69,9597 Protein misfolding cyclic amplification exploits the ability of PrPTSE to induce conformational conversion of PrPC to misfolded, protease K-resistant forms of the protein and has emerged as a sensitive technique for detecting low levels of pathogenic prion protein (detection limit of 1 × 10−12 dilution of 10% BH from hamsters infected with the 263K strain of hamster-adapted scrapie; estimated to be equivalent of 1.3 ag PrPTSE, or approximately 26 molecules).94,98 Here we use a form of PMCA adapted to a microplate format and including Teflon beads (mbPMCA) to measure the in vitro converting ability of prions as a proxy for infectivity and to sensitively detect PrPTSE.

We exposed PrPTSE (15 μL PK-treated 10% CWD BH) to 125 mM HSO5 with and without 3 mM CoCl2 for 1 h. Samples were either quenched at the end of the exposure or pretreated with 0.5 M Na2S2O3. A 4 μL aliquot of the reaction mixture was then added to 36 μL NBH and subjected to two rounds of 96 cycles of mbPMCA. Immunoreactivity was not detected at any dilution examined in samples that had been exposed to HSO5 regardless of whether Co2+ had been added to the sample (Figure 3). Pre-treatment with thiosulfate allowed detection of PrPTSE immunoreactivity for dilutions of CWD-positive deer BH to the 10−7.6 dilution. These results indicate that 1-h treatment with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate + 3 mM CoCl2 decreased the PrPC-to-PrPTSE converting ability of PrPTSE by a factor of at least 105.9. This factor was arrived at by considering that the lowest (10−2) and highest dilutions (10−7.9) at which untreated controls could be amplified and treated samples could not.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Treatment with peroxymonosulfate ± CoCl2 reduces the in vitro PrPC-to-PrPTSE converting ability of CWD agent by a factor of at least 105.9. PrPTSE (15 μL PK-treated 10% CWD BH) was incubated with 125 mM peroxymonosulfate with or without 3 mM CoCl2 for 1 h. Samples were either quenched at the end of the experimental time point or pre-treated with 0.3 M Na2S2O3. A 4 μL aliquot of resulting sample was added to 36 μL NBH and subjected to two rounds of 96 cycles of PMCAb. (A) PrPTSE immunoreactivity is present in a 10−7.9 dilution from 10% brain homogenate from a white-tailed deer clinically affected by chronic wasting disease when peroxymonosulfate and CoCl2 is pre-treated with thiosulfate, but not detected at any dilution (up to 10−2.0, B) examined when exposed to peroxymonosulfate + CoCl2 or peroxymonosulfate alone. Values above lanes indicate dilution from CWD brain homogenate. Immunoblots were probed with mAbs 8G8 and Bar224. Blot is representative of three replicates.

Modifications to PrPTSE induced by exposure to peroxymonosulfate

The immunoblotting results presented above demonstrate that peroxymonosulfate in the absence or presence of added CoCl2 is capable of degrading pathogenic prion protein. To gain insight into modifications to pathogenic prion protein induced by exposure to peroxymonosulfate ± CoCl2, we analyzed PrPTSE following such treatment by LC-MS/MS. We incubated PrPTSE (PK-treated purified HY preparation) with 9.6 mM HSO5 in the absence and presence of 230 μM CoCl2 for 15 or 60 min. Samples were either quenched at the end of each time point or pre-treated with 0.5 M sodium thiosulfate.

Exposure to peroxymonosulfate in the absence and presence of CoCl2 resulted in oxidative modifications to tryptophan and methionine residues. Reproducible tryptophan hydroxylation was observed on chymotryptic peptide fragments containing W56 (GNDW(o)EDRY) and W10 (GQGGGTHNQW(o)), where (o) indicates oxidative modification. In Figure 4, we show the intensity ratios of these peptide fragments with and without modified tryptophan residues for samples exposed to HSO5 for 15 min. Substantially higher levels of oxidized tryptophan residues were present at both locations in samples containing unquenched peroxymonosulfate, consistent with a previous report of oxidative modification of free tryptophan.92 The location of these residues are displayed on the molecular model of PrPTSE (Figure S2).

Figure 4. Exposure of pathogenic prion protein to peroxymonosulfate results in oxidative modification to tryptophan and methionine residues.

Figure 4

PrPTSE (proteinase K-treated purified HY preparation) was incubated with ultrapure water or 9.6 mM peroxymonosulfate for 15 min. After quenching with 0.5 M Na2S2O3, samples were digested with chymotrypsin (panels a and b) or trypsin + endoprotease Lys-C (panels c and d) and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Hydroxytryptophan (W56, a; W10, b) and methionine sulfone (M117, c; M124, d) were detected in samples treated with peroxymonosulfate that were not pre-quenched with 0.5 M Na2S2O3. Bars indicate replicates of precursor ions.

Reproducible methionine modifications were detected near the C-terminus of the protein on tryptic (+ endoprotease Lys-C) peptides containing M117 (GENFTETDIKIM(sulfone)ER) and M124 (VVEQM(sulfone)CTTQYQK) (Figure 4C, and D; mapped onto the molecular model of PrPTSE, Figure S2). The modified methionine residues were absent in samples not exposed to peroxymonosulfate or pre-treated with sodium thiosulfate. Following incubation with peroxymonosulfate in the absence of cobalt, the methionine sulfone-containing peptides were detected at similar intensities after both 15- and 60-min exposures. The same modification, but at substantially lower intensities was observed in 15- and 60-min reactions with peroxymonosulfate + CoCl2 (data not shown). This result may reflect a true reduction in intensity of the sulfone modification, or enhanced protein degradation by peroxymonosulfate + CoCl2 leading to reduced production of these particular peptide fragments, consistent with individual methionine amino acid modifications seen previously.92 Similar results were seen by Requena et al.30 wherein hydrogen peroxide exposure led to the oxidation of methionine residues 109, 112, 129, and 134 in recombinant PrP (SHa, 29–231).

Environmental Implications

Prions are remarkably resistant to inactivation,8 and their persistence in the environment creates a need to develop effective in situ remediation methods for prion-contaminated lands. We have demonstrated that peroxymonosulfate can rapidly degrade and inactivate pathogenic prion protein. We further showed that Co(II)-catalyzed decomposition of HSO5 to SO4· accelerated prion degradation. The extent of prion inactivation suggested by the reduction of template-directed misfolding ability as measured by mbPMCA (≥ 5.9 log10 reduction for 1-h exposure to 125 mM HSO5 ± 3 mM CoCl2) compares favorably with that for other oxidants that have been tested for their ability to inactivate prions (Table 1). Peroxymonosulfate possesses advantages over some of the other oxidants listed in Table 1 for in situ chemical oxidation. Peroxymonosulfate does not require low pH as does Fenton’s reagent for optimal hydroxyl radical production99 or the addition of toxic metals as does Cu2+-catalyzed decomposition of H2O2 to produce ·OH.100 Reductions of infectivity of >6 log have been achieved via exposure to the Fenton reagent, but at elevated temperature (50 °C for 22 h).39 Heterogeneous photocatalytically produced ·OH have been shown to reduce prion infecitivty,101 but the utility of such methods for in situ chemical oxidation is limited because the photic zone in soils is on the order of 0.5 mm.102,103 While ozone has been demonstrated to inactivate prions,3133 its use to inactivate prions in soil is complicated by the gaseous nature of the oxidant. In some soil environments, the deposition of SO42− may represent a concern for the application of peroxymonosulfate for in situ chemical oxidation.

Oxidative modifications to proteins can make them more susceptible to proteolytic degradation.104 This suggests that if peroxymonosulfate effected only partial PrPTSE degradation in the environment, the resulting oxidative modifications may render it susceptible to in situ degradation by native or added proteases. Our results strongly suggest that peroxymonosulfate, even without activation to radical species via transition metal activation, high temperatures or UV exposure, holds promise for in situ remediation of prion-contaminated land surfaces. Future research directed at the efficacy of peroxymonosulfate in degrading pathogenic prion protein and inactivating prions associated with soil constituents is warranted. We also note that peroxymonosulfate may prove useful in decontaminating medical instruments.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information

Footnotes

Supporting Information Available.

Supplementary methods and figures. This information is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

References

  • 1.Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:13363–13383. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prusiner SB. Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science. 1991;252:1515–1522. doi: 10.1126/science.1675487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bolton DC, Bendheim PE, Marmorstein AD, Potempska A. Isolation and structural studies of the intact scrapie agent protein. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1987;258:579–590. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(87)90380-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Caughey B, Raymond GJ, Kocisko DA, Lansbury PT., Jr Scrapie infectivity correlates with converting activity protease resistance, and aggregation of scrapie-associated prion protein in guanidine denaturation studies. J Virol. 1997;71:4107–4110. doi: 10.1128/jvi.71.5.4107-4110.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKinley MP, Bolton DC, Prusiner SB. A protease-resistant protein is a structural component of the scrapie prion. Cell. 1983;35:57–62. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(83)90207-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Prusiner SB, Cochran SP, Groth DF, Downey DE, Bowman KA, Martinez HM. Measurement of the scrapie agent using an incubation time interval assay. Ann Neurol. 1982;11:353–358. doi: 10.1002/ana.410110406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Prusiner SB, Groth DF, Cochran SP, Masiarz FR, McKinley MP, Martinez HM. Molecular properties, partial purification, and assay by incubation period measurements of the hamster scrapie agent. Biochem. 1980;19:4883–4891. doi: 10.1021/bi00562a028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taylor DM. Inactivation of prions by physical and chemical means. J Hosp Infect. 1999;43(Suppl):S69–76. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(99)90067-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pedersen JA, Somerville RA. Why and how are CWD and Scrapie sometimes spread via environmental routes? In: Reisner D, Deslys J-P, editors. Decontamination of Prions. Dusseldorf University Press; Dusseldorf Germany: 2012. pp. 19–37. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Almberg ES, Cross PC, Johnson CJ, Heisey DM, Richards BJ. Modeling routes of chronic wasting disease transmission: Environmental prion persistence promotes deer population decline and extinction. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Haley NJ, Seelig DM, Zabel MD, Telling GC, Hoover EA. Detection of CWD prions in urine and saliva of deer by transgenic mouse bioassay. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mathiason CK, Powers JG, Dahmes SJ, Osborn DA, Miller KV, Warren RJ, Mason GL, Hays SA, Hayes-Klug J, Seelig DM, Wild MA, Wolfe LL, Spraker TR, Miller MW, Sigurdson CJ, Telling GC, Hoover EA. Infectious prions in the saliva and blood of deer with chronic wasting disease. Science. 2006;314:133–136. doi: 10.1126/science.1132661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miller MW, Williams ES, Hobbs NT, Wolfe LL. Environmental sources of prion transmission in mule deer. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1003–1006. doi: 10.3201/eid1006.040010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Race R, Jenny A, Sutton D. Scrapie infectivity and proteinase K–resistant prion protein in sheep placenta, brain, spleen, and lymph node: Implications for transmission and antemortem diagnosis. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:949–953.15. doi: 10.1086/515669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tamguney G, Miller MW, Wolfe LL, Sirochman TM, Glidden DV, Palmer C, Lemus A, DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Asymptomatic deer excrete infectious prions in faeces. Nature. 2009;461:529–532. doi: 10.1038/nature08289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Brown P, Gajdusek DC. Survival of scrapie virus after 3 years’ interment. Lancet. 1991;337:269–770. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)90873-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Georgsson G, Sigurdarson S, Brown P. Infectious agent of sheep scrapie may persist in the environment for at least 16 years. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:3737–3740. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82011-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Seidel B, Thomzig A, Buschmann A, Groschup MH, Peters R, Beekes M, Terytze K. Scrapie agent (strain 263K) can transmit disease via the oral route after persistence in soil over years. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cooke CM, Rodger J, Smith A, Fernie K, Shaw G, Somerville RA. Fate of prions in soil: Detergent extraction of PrP from soils. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:811–817. doi: 10.1021/es0618189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnson CJ, Phillips KE, Schramm PT, McKenzie D, Aiken JM, Pedersen JA. Prions adhere to soil minerals and remain infectious. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e32. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0020032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ma X, Benson CH, McKenzie D, Aiken JM, Pedersen JA. Adsorption of pathogenic prion protein to quartz sand. Environ Sci Technol. 2007;41:2324–2330. doi: 10.1021/es062122i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boyd SA, Mortland MM. Enzyme interactions with clays and clay-organic matter complexes. In: Stotzky G, Bollag J-M, editors. Soil Biochemistry. Vol. 6. Marcel Dekker; New York: 1990. pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nielsen KM, Calamai L, Pietramellara G. Stabilization of extracellular DNA and proteins by transient binding to various soil components. In: Nannipieri P, Smalla K, editors. Nucleic Acids and Protiens in Soil. Vol. 8. Springer; Germany: 2006. pp. 142–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Williams ES, Miller MW, Kreeger TJ, Kahn RH, Thorne ET. Chronic wasting disease of deer and elk: A review with recommendations for management. J Wildl Manag. 2002;66:551–563. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chamarro E, Marco A, Esplugas S. Use of Fenton reagent to improve organic chemical biodegradability. Wat Res. 2001;35:1047–1051. doi: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00342-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liang C, Huang CF, Chen YJ. Potential for activated persulfate degradation of BTEX contamination. Wat Res. 2008;42:4091–4100. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tsitonaki A, Petri B, Crimi M, Mosbæk H, Siegrist RL, Bjerg PL. In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater using persulfate: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2010;40:55–91. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Matta R, Hanna K, Chiron S. Fenton-like oxidation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene using different iron minerals. Sci Total Environ. 2007;385:242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Furman O, Laine DF, Blumenfeld A, Teel AL, Shimizu K, Cheng IF, Watts RJ. Enhanced reactivity of superoxide in water-soild matrices. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:1528–1533. doi: 10.1021/es802505s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Requena JR, Dimitrova MN, Legname G, Teijeira S, Prusiner SB, Levine RL. Oxidation of methionine residues in the prion protein by hydrogen peroxide. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2004;432:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2004.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ding N, Neumann NF, Price LM, Braithwaite SL, Balachandran A, Belosevic M, El-Din MG. Inactivation of template-directed misfolding of infectious prion protein by ozone. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:613–620. doi: 10.1128/AEM.06791-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ding N, Neumann NF, Price LM, Braithwaite SL, Balachandran A, Belosevic M, Gamal El-Din M. Ozone inactivation of infectious prions in rendering plant and municipal wastewaters. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470–471:717–725. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ding N, Neumann NF, Price LM, Braithwaite SL, Balachandran A, Mitchell G, Belosevic M, Gamal El-Din M. Kinetics of ozone inactivation of infectious prion protein. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2721–30. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03698-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rutala WA, Weber DJ Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of A. Guideline for disinfection and sterilization of prion-contaminated medical instruments. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:107–117. doi: 10.1086/650197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brown P, Rohwer RG, Gajdusek CD. Newer data on the inactivation of scrapie virus or Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease virus in brain tissue. J Infect Dis. 1986;153:1145–1148. doi: 10.1093/infdis/153.6.1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Brown P, Rohwer RG, Green EM, Gadjusek DC. Effect of chemicals, heat, and histopathologic processing on high-infectivity hamster-adapted scrapie virus. J Infect Dis. 1982;145:683–687. doi: 10.1093/infdis/145.2.683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Park SJ, Kim NH, Jeong BH, Jin JK, Choi JK, Park YJ, Kim JI, Carp RI, Kim YS. The effect of Fenton reaction on protease-resistant prion protein (PrPSc) degradation and scrapie infectivity. Brain Res. 2008;1238:172–180. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Paspaltsis I, Berberidou C, Poulios I, Sklaviadis T. Photocatalytic degradation of prions using the photo-Fenton reagent. J Hosp Infect. 2009;71:149–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2008.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Suyama K, Yoshioka M, Akagawa M, Murayama Y, Horii H, Takata M, Yokoyama T, Mohri S. Assessment of prion inactivation by Fenton reaction using protein misfolding cyclic amplification and bioassay. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007;71:2069–2071. doi: 10.1271/bbb.70085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Do SH, Jo JH, Jo YH, Lee HK, Kong SH. Application of a peroxymonosulfate/cobalt (PMS/Co(II)) system to treat diesel-contaminated soil. Chemosphere. 2009;77:1127–1131. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD. Degradation of organic contaminants in water with sulfate radicals generated by the conjugation of peroxymonosulfate with cobalt. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:4790–4797. doi: 10.1021/es0263792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Anipsitakis GP, Tufano TP, Dionysiou DD. Chemical and microbial decontamination of pool water using activated potassium peroxymonosulfate. Wat Res. 2008;42:2899–2910. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Anipsitakis GP. Thesis. University of Cincinnati; Cincinnati, OH: 2005. Cobalt/peroxymonosulfate and related oxidizing reagents for water treatment. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lou X, Wu L, Guo Y, Chen C, Wang Z, Xiao D, Fang C, Liu J, Zhao J, Lu S. Peroxymonosulfate activation by phosphate anion for organics degradation in water. Chemosphere. 2014;117:582–585. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang S, Wang P, Yang X, Shan L, Zhang W, Shao X, Niu R. Degradation efficiencies of azo dye Acid Orange 7 by the interaction of heat, UV and anions with common oxidants: Persulfate, peroxymonosulfate and hydrogen peroxide. J Hazard Mater. 2010;179:552–558. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.03.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Steele WJ, Appelman EH. The standard enthalpy of formation of peroxymonosulfate (HSO5−) and the standard electrode potential of the peroxymonosulfate-bisulfate couple. J Chem Thermodynamics. 1982;14:337–344. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ball DL, Edwards JO. The kinetics and mechanism of the decomposition of Caro’s acid. J Am Chem Soc. 1956;78:1125–1129. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.DuPont; DuPont, editor. DuPont oxone technical attributes. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Curini M, Epifano F, Marcotullio MC, Rosati O. Oxone®: A convenient reagent for the oxidation of acetals. Synlett. 1999;6:777–779. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Denmark SE, Forbes DC, Hays DS, DePue JS, Wilde RG. Catalytic epoxidation of alkenes with oxone. J Org Chem. 1995;60:1391–1407. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trost BM, Curran DP. Chemoselective oxidation of sulfides to sulfones with potassium hydrogen persulfate. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981;22:1287–1290. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wozniak LA, Stec WJ. Oxidation in organophosphorus chemistry: Potassium peroxymonosulphate. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999;40:2637–2640. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu H, Bruton TA, Doyle FM, Sedlak DL. In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated groundwater by persulfate: Decomposition by Fe(III)- and Mn(IV)-containing oxides and aquifer materials. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:10330–10336. doi: 10.1021/es502056d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chan KH, Chu W. Degradation of atrazine by cobalt-mediated activation of peroxymonosulfate: Different cobalt counteranions in homogenous process and cobalt oxide catalysts in photolytic heterogeneous process. Wat Res. 2009;43:2513–2521. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD. Transition metal/UV-based advanced oxidation technologies for water decontamination. Appl Catal B. 2004;54:155–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD. Radical generation by the interaction of transition metals with common oxidants. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38:3705–3712. doi: 10.1021/es035121o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Anipsitakis GP, Dionysiou DD, Gonzalez MA. Cobalt-mediated activation of peroxymonosulfate and sulfate radical attack on phenolic compounds. Implications of chloride ions. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40:1000–1007. doi: 10.1021/es050634b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ji Y, Dong C, Kong D, Lu J. New insights into atrazine degradation by cobalt catalyzed peroxymonosulfate oxidation: Kinetics, reaction products and transformation mechanisms. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:491–500. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Neta P, Hule RE, Ross AB. Rate constants for reactions of inorganic radicals in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1988;17:1027–1284. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Buxton GV, Greenstock CL, Helman PW, Ross AB. Critical review of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals. J Phys Chem Ref Data. 1988;17:513–886. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rastogi A, Al-Abed SR, Dionysiou DD. Sulfate radical-based ferrous–peroxymonosulfate oxidative system for PCBs degradation in aqueous and sediment systems. Appl Catal B. 2009;85:171–179. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rivas FJ, Beltran FJ, Carvalho F, Alvarez PM. Oxone-promoted wet air oxidation of landfill Lleachates. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2005;44:749–758. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.He X, de la Cruz AA, Dionysiou DD. Destruction of cyanobacterial toxin cylindrospermopsin by hydroxyl radicals and sulfate radicals using UV-254nm activation of hydrogen peroxide, persulfate and peroxymonosulfate. J Photochem Photobiol A. 2013;251:160–166. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Paradkar VM, Latham TB, Demko DM. Oxidative decarboxylation of alpha-amino acids with insitu generated dimethyl dioxirane. Synlett. 1995:1059–1060. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Johnson CJ, Herbst A, Duque-Velasquez C, Vanderloo JP, Bochsler P, Chappell R, McKenzie D. Prion protein polymorphisms affect chronic wasting disease progression. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e17450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.McKenzie D, Bartz J, Mirwald J, Olander D, Marsh R, Aiken JM. Reversibility of scrapie inactivation is enhanced by copper. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25545–25547. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.40.25545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Smith CB, Booth CJ, Wadzinski TJ, Legname G, Chappell R, Johnson CJ, Pedersen JA. Humic substances interfere with detection of pathogenic prion protein. Soil Biol Biochem. 2014;68:309–316. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Johnson CJ, Aiken JM, McKenzie D, Samuel MD, Pedersen JA. Highly efficient amplification of chronic wasting disease agent by protein misfolding cyclic amplification with beads (PMCAb) PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35383. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Moudjou M, Sibille P, Fichet G, Reine F, Chapuis J, Herzog L, Jaumain E, Laferriere F, Richard CA, Laude H, Andreoletti O, Rezaei H, Beringue V. Highly infectious prions generated by a single round of microplate-based protein misfolding cyclic amplification. MBio. 2014;5:e00829–13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00829-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Browning SR, Mason GL, Seward T, Green M, Eliason GA, Mathiason C, Miller MW, Williams ES, Hoover E, Telling GC. Transmission of prions from mule deer and elk with chronic wasting disease to transgenic mice expressing cervid PrP. J Virol. 2004;78:13345–13350. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.23.13345-13350.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Peretz D, Supattapone S, Giles K, Vergara J, Freyman Y, Lessard P, Safar JG, Glidden DV, McCulloch C, Nguyen HO, Scott M, Dearmond SJ, Prusiner SB. Inactivation of prions by acidic sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Virol. 2006;80:322–331. doi: 10.1128/JVI.80.1.322-331.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Somerville RA, Gentles N. Characterization of the effect of heat on agent strains of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. J Gen Virol. 2011;92:1738–1748. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.030452-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pitre A, Pan Y, Pruett S, Skalli O. On the use of ratio standard curves to accurately quantitate relative changes in protein levels by Western blot. Anal Biochem. 2007;361:305–307. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Govaerts C, Wille H, Prusiner SB, Cohen FE. Evidence for assembly of prions with left-handed β-helices into trimers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:8342–8347. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402254101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Davies KJA. Protein damage and degradation by oxygen radicals. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:9895–9901. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Aiken JM, Williamson JL, Borchardt LM, Marsh RF. Presence of mitochondrial D-loop DNA in scrapie-infected brain preparations enriched for the prion protein. J Virol. 1990;64:3265–3268. doi: 10.1128/jvi.64.7.3265-3268.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kellings K, Meyer N, Mirenda C, Prusiner SB, Riesner D. Analysis of nucleic acids in purified scrapie prion preparations. Arch Virol Suppl. 1993;7:215–225. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9300-6_17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Moore RA, Timmes A, Wilmarth PA, Priola SA. Comparative profiling of highly enriched 22L and C handler mouse scrapie prion protein preparations. Proteomics. 2010;10:2858–2869. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Raymond GJ, Chabry J. Purification of the pathological isoform of prion protein (PrPSc or PrPres) from transmissible spongiform encephalopathy-affected brain tissue. In: Lehmann S, Grassi J, editors. Techniques in Prion Research. Birkhäuser Verlag; Basel: 2004. pp. 16–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zhu W, Ford WT. Oxidation of alkenes with aqueous potassium peroxymonosulfate and no organic solvent. J Org Chem. 1991;56:7022–7026. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Betterton EA, Hoffmann MR. Oxidation of aqueous SO2 by peroxymonosulfate. Environ Sci Technol. 1988;92:5962–5965. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Stockel J, Safar JG, Wallace AC, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB. Prion protein selectively binds copper(II) ions. Biochem. 1998;37:7185–7193. doi: 10.1021/bi972827k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Wong BS, Chen SG, Colucci M, Xie Z, Pan T, Liu T, Li R, Gambetti P, Sy MS, Brown DR. Aberrant metal binding by prion protein in human prion disease. J Neurochem. 2001;78:1400–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00522.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ren Y, Lin L, Ma J, Yang J, Feng J, Fan Z. Sulfate radicals induced from peroxymonosulfate by magnetic ferrospinel MFe2O4 (M = Co, Cu, Mn, and Zn) as heterogeneous catalysts in the water. Appl Catal B. 2015;165:572–578. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kim J, Edwards JO. A study of cobalt catalysis and copper modification in the coupled decompositions of hydrogen peroxide and peroxomonosulfate ion. Inorg Chim Acta. 1995;235:9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Gilbert BC, Stell JK. Mechanisms of peroxide decomposition: An electron paramagnetic resonance study of the reaction of the peroxymonosulfate anion (HOOSO3−) with Cu. J Chem Soc Faraday Trans. 1990;86:3261–3266. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Brown DR. Metal toxicity and therapeutic intervention: Copper and prion disease. Biochem Soc Trans. 2002;30:742–745. doi: 10.1042/bst0300742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nilsson J, Stahl S, Lundeberg J, Uhlen M, Nygren PA. Affinity fusion strategies for detection, purification, and immobilization of recombinant proteins. Protein Express Purif. 1997;11:1–16. doi: 10.1006/prep.1997.0767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Hayon E, Treinin A, Wilf J. Electronic spectra, photochemistry, and autoxidation mechanism of the sulfite-bisulfite-pyrosulfite systems. The SO2−, SO3−, SO4−, and SO5− radicals. J Am Chem Soc. 1971;94:47–57. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Neta P, Madhavan V, Zemel H, Fessenden RW. Rate constants and mechanism of reaction of SO4·− with aromatic compounds. J Am Chem Soc. 1976;99:163–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Khmenlinskii IV, Plyusnin VF, Grivin VP. Mechanism of the formation of the Cl2− ion radical in the photolysis of the FeCl4− complex in ethanol saturated with HCl. Russ J Phys Chem. 1989;63:1494–1497. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Ruiz Vélez M. PhD Dissertation. University of Wisconsin – Madison; Madison, WI: 2015. Oxidation of amino acids by peroxymonosulfate and sorption of antibiotics to natural organic matter. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Herskovits TT, Gadegbeku B, Jaillet H. On the structural stability and solvent denaturation of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1970;245:2588–2598. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Saá P, Castilla J, Soto C. Ultra-efficient replication of infectious prions by automated protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:35245–35452. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603964200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Klingeborn M, Race B, Meade-White KD, Chesebro B. Lower specific infectivity of protease-resistant prion protein generated in cell-free reactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:E1244–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111255108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Shikiya RA, Bartz JC. In vitro generation of high-titer prions. J Virol. 2011;85:13439–13442. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06134-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Weber P, Giese A, Piening N, Mitteregger G, Thomzig A, Beekes M, Kretzschmar HA. Cell-free formation of misfolded prion protein with authentic prion infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15818–15823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605608103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Silveira JR, Raymond GJ, Hughson AG, Race RE, Sim VL, Hayes SF, Caughey B. The most infectious prion protein particles. Nature. 2005;437:257–261. doi: 10.1038/nature03989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Gogate PR, Pandit AB. A review of imperative technologies for wastewater treatment I: Oxidation technologies at ambient conditions. Adv Environ Res. 2004;8:501–551. [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Solassol J, Pastore M, Crozet C, Perrier V, Lehmann S. A novel copper-hydrogen peroxide formulation for prion decontamination. J Infect Dis. 2006;194:865–869. doi: 10.1086/506947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Paspaltsis I, Kotta K, Lagoudaki R, Grigoriadis N, Poulios I, Sklaviadis T. Titanium dioxide photocatalytic inactivation of prions. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:3125–3130. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81746-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Hebert VR, Miller GC. Depth dependence of direct and indirect photolysis on soil surfaces. J Agric Food Chem. 1990;38:913–918. [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Geddes J, Miller GC. Photolysis of organics in the environment. In: Macalady DL, editor. Perspectives in Environmental Chemistry. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 1998. pp. 195–209. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Climent I, Tsai L, Levine RL. Derivatization of γ-glutamyl semialdehyde residues in oxidized proteins by fluoresceinamine. Anal Biochem. 1989;182:226–32. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(89)90584-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Russo F, Johnson CJ, Johnson CJ, McKenzie D, Aiken JM, Pedersen JA. Pathogenic prion protein is degraded by a manganese oxide mineral found in soils. J Gen Virol. 2009;90:275–280. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.003251-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information

RESOURCES