Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2016 Sep 15;33:1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2016.09.001

GRIM-19: A master regulator of cytokine induced tumor suppression, metastasis and energy metabolism

Shreeram C Nallar 1, Dhan V Kalvakolanu 1,*
PMCID: PMC5337140  NIHMSID: NIHMS818804  PMID: 27659873

Abstract

Cytokines induce cell proliferation or growth suppression depending on the context. It is increasingly becoming clear that success of standard radiotherapy and/or chemotherapeutics to eradicate solid tumors is dependent on IFN signaling. In this review we discuss the molecular mechanisms of tumor growth suppression by a gene product isolated in our laboratory using a genome-wide expression knock-down strategy. Gene associated with retinoid-IFN-induced mortality −19 (GRIM-19) functions as non-canonical tumor suppressor by antagonizing oncoproteins. As a component of mitochondrial respiratory chain, GRIM-19 influences the degree of “Warburg effect” in cancer cells as many advanced and/or aggressive tumors show severely down-regulated GRIM-19 levels. In addition, GRIM-19 appears to regulate innate and acquired immune responses in mouse models. Thus, GRIM-19 is positioned at nodes that favor cell protection and/or prevent aberrant cell growth.

Keywords: cytokines, anti-tumor action, glucose metabolism, cell motility

Introduction

A fundamental requirement for multicellular organisms is to maintain healthy tissue architecture by removing excessive unwanted cells or damaged/infected cells, and replenishing them with a new set. Damage emerges from external sources like pathogens, non-biological agents or internal sources such as changes in the levels of cytokines, growth and survival factors synthesized by the host or oxidative damage associated with metabolism. Any dysregulation of these processes results in various pathologies, including the development and progression of cancer. Development of neoplastic cells is held in check via 4 major mechanisms: 1) senescence, 2) cell cycle arrest, 3) activation of apoptosis, and 4) immune responses. Cytokines play critical roles in these processes [1]. Cytokines are both secreted and membrane bound proteins, important for cell-to-cell signaling. This review will address how disruptions in cytokine-induced signaling pathways can lead to acquisition and maintenance of sustained proliferative capacity and loss of growth-inhibitory mechanisms. Primarily, we focus on the actions of a novel tumor suppressor, Gene associated with Retinoid-Interferon-induced Mortality-19 (GRIM-19) [2].

The IFN family of cytokines is constituted by multiple sub-type proteins, α, β, γ, δ, κ, ε, λ, τ, ω, and δ. Classically IFNs were described as agents that establish an anti-viral state in cells by inducing the expression of cellular IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). It is now clear that IFNs inhibit cancer cell growth and proliferation either by direct induction of anti-cellular gene expression or by promoting immune response. These two modes of anti-tumor effects, however, are not mutually exclusive. IFNs are grossly classified into three types, based on their usage of cell surface receptors (see [3] for a review). Type-I IFNs (IFN-α/β/ε/κ/ω) signal through a common heterodimeric receptor constituted by the IFNAR1/2 subunits, type-II IFN (IFN-γ) signals through a different heterodimeric receptor (IFNGR1/2), while type-III IFNs (IFN-λ1/2/3) signal through a heterodimeric receptor consisting of IFNLR1 and IL-10RB subunits [4]. IFNLR1 and IL-10RB subunits are also used by IL-28 and IL-10, respectively. IFNs primarily regulate immune response through the Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK) and Signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. IFNs act as sentinels to prevent and/or eliminate tumor development [1, 5]. Administration of type-I IFNs into tumor-bearing animals inhibited tumor growth in pre-clinical studies [6]. IFNs inhibit tumor growth as efficiently as many clinically used therapeutics [7]. However, the therapeutic utility of IFNs for human cancers is limited by their debilitating side effects and tumor stage-specific differences in gene expression programs of cancer cells [8]. Nonetheless, the single-agent efficacy of IFNs is comparable to many currently used chemotherapeutics. A number of recent reports indicate that the success of conventional chemotherapeutics, targeted anti-cancer agents, radiotherapy and immunotherapy relies on type-I IFN signaling [914] in vivo. As a result, several human cancers accumulate IFN signaling defects to escape from growth suppression [15]. Several experimental [16, 17] and clinical studies [1820] showed a therapeutic benefit of combining IFNs with other agents. One such combination is the use of vitamin-A metabolite, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA or RA), which is known to cause cell differentiation. RA itself exhibits significant anti-tumor effects in head and neck cancers [21] and acute promyelocytic leukemia [22]. Although IFNs and RA induce growth suppression using different mechanisms i.e., gene products, pre-treatment with RA followed by IFN only showed promising tumor suppression [6]. The mechanistic bases for this cross-talk can be found in our earlier publications [23, 24]. In this review we will focus on an IFN/RA-inducible gene product, GRIM-19, that emerged as a tumor suppressor over the years.

The GRIMs

Although it was clear that IFN and retinoid combinations exert potent tumor-suppressive effects, the molecular bases for this effect were not known. IFN/RA combination was known to induce apoptosis in cells that lacked functional p53 and/or caspase-3 proteins. Therefore, we hypothesized that the anti-tumor effects of IFN/RA combination are mediated by novel factors. To identify these, our lab employed a genome-wide expression knockdown strategy [25] that permitted the isolation of cell-death associated genes. This approach does not require a priori knowledge of the gene products involved. Briefly, a total cDNA library was expressed in an anti-sense orientation under the control of an IFN-responsive promoter from an episomal vector and the transfected cells were stimulated with IFN/RA. The use of an IFN-responsive promoter for anti-sense expression in this strategy mandates the functioning of JAK-STAT signaling. As a result, this strategy does not permit a general resistance to IFNs through a knockdown of the receptor or the signaling components by anti-sense transcripts. Upon treatment, cells harboring the potential mediators of IFN/RA-induced cell death will survive. The surviving cell clones were expanded and the isolated episomes [26] were sequenced to identify the gene products. Based on this observation, they were named as Gene-associated with Retinoid-Interferon induced Mortality (GRIM). Interestingly, none of the isolated genes in this screen were known apoptosis inducers like caspases, pro-apoptotic Bcl2 and/or death receptor family members. Twelve distinct GRIMs were isolated and research has been performed on three genes viz., GRIM-12 (HGCN symbol: TXNRD1) [27], GRIM-19 (HGCN symbol: NDUFA13) [2] and GRIM-1 (HGCN symbol: SHQ1) [28]. GRIM-12, a thioredoxin reductase, protects cells from oxidative stress while GRIM-1 regulates RNA metabolism. This review will focus on the biological actions, physiological and pathological relevance of GRIM-19.

GRIM-19

The gene for human GRIM-19 is located on chromosome 19p13.2 [29], which is syntenic to mouse 8C1. Both human and mouse GRIM-19 genes contain 5 exons with one major exception - the first exon of mouse Grim-19 gene is a long 5′ UTR. In all human cells examined to date, an abundant GRIM-19 transcript (~550 nt) that codes for a 144-aa protein with a Mr of 16 kDa. The mouse Grim-19 mRNA (~1200 nt) still codes only for a 144-aa protein. The GRIM-19 protein has no apparent homology to other proteins within their respective genomes. The gene for GRIM-19 is highly conserved in eukaryotes in spite of the differences observed across phyla. Subsequent to our report on the discovery GRIM-19, a mass spectrometric analysis of protein components of the purified bovine heart mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) complex revealed the presence of GRIM-19 in respiratory complex-1 (RC-1) commonly known as NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) [30]. This was consistent with our immunofluorescence studies, which revealed the presence of GRIM-19 protein in mitochondria [2]. Apart from this, however, a significant fraction of GRIM-19 protein is present in the nucleus and cytoplasm (non-mitochondrial fractions) whose exact function(s) is not known. The following sections summarize recently described functional interactions of GRIM-19. For details on previously described functions of GRIM-19, the reader is suggested to read our earlier reviews [24, 31].

Non-mitochondrial functions of GRIM-19

Using yeast two-hybrid screens, we and others have identified several proteins that interact with GRIM-19. While our studies were focused on identifying GRIM-19-interacting proteins, others have identified GRIM-19 as a binding partner for their protein(s)-of-interest. The first mammalian protein reported to interact with GRIM-19 was STAT3 [32, 33]. OLFM4 (GW112) [34], HTRA2 [35] and NOD2 [36] were identified later by this approach, while CDKN2A (p16INK4A) was identified in a proteomic analysis [37].

Effects on STAT3

Following cytokine-receptor engagement multiple intra-cellular signaling pathways are rapidly activated leading to the induction of several cellular genes. Among these, the JAK-STAT signaling pathway is by far the best understood. In these pathways, non-receptor tyrosine kinases (NTKs) of the Janus kinase (JAK) family associate with the intracellular surfaces of cytokine receptor, whose activity is stimulated following a ligand-induced aggregation of receptor. Following this, receptor is tyrosine phosphorylated providing an anchoring point for the Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) proteins, which allows their activation by JAKs. STAT proteins act as both signal transducers and activators of transcription. Four distinct JAKs are known to activate seven STAT proteins by phosphorylation, depending on the cytokine (see [38] for a review). In the steady state, STAT proteins exist as latent cytoplasmic proteins. JAK-induced phosphorylation of STAT at a critical tyrosine residue allows them to form dimers with their SH2 domains. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), like growth factor receptors, and other NTKs belonging to the Src-family of kinases (SFKs) also activate some STAT proteins by a similar mechanism but independently of the JAKs [39]. Among the seven family members, STATs 1 and 3 are activated by a number of cytokines. STAT3 is unique among STATs, as it is activated by RTKs (cytokine and growth factor) as well as NTKs (JAKs and SFKs). Hence, STAT3 regulates several biological functions in mammals including embryonic development [40], cell survival by inhibiting apoptosis [41], growth factor and cytokine-driven responses [38], liver function [42] etc (see Yu et al [43] for a recent review on STAT3 signaling in cancer). Phosphorylation of the Y705 residue of STAT3 occurs after ligand binding to the receptor, leading to its dimerization and rapid entry into the nucleus. Phosphorylation of the S727 in the trans-activation domain (TAD) is also critical for the full spectrum of STAT3 transcriptional activity [44]. STAT3 activity is maximal when both Y705 and S727 residues are phosphorylated [45]. One report suggested that GRIM-19 interaction with the non-TAD portion of STAT3 protein prevented its nuclear entry [32]. In contrast to this, we have found that GRIM-19 binding to STAT3 requires the S727 residue and the TAD [33]. GRIM-19, without preventing nuclear entry or DNA binding of STAT3 inhibited transcription (Fig. 1). Support for this mechanism comes when GRIM-19 inhibited a spontaneously-dimerizing Stat3 (S3C)-driven transcription of Bcl2 gene [46]. Using ChIP assays, we have demonstrated the physical presence of GRIM-19 at a STAT3-binding motif of this gene promoter. Such promoter binding of GRIM-19 required STAT3. Intracellular signals like redox imbalance and reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate Bcl-2 family of proteins either to protect or destroy a cell [47, 48]. These proteins localize to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM) where they regulate mitochondrial membrane permeability and hence the release of cytochrome C from the inter-membrane space (IMS). Cytochrome C in the cytoplasm triggers the formation of ‘Apoptosome’ and initiates cell death. The Bcl-2 family of proteins functions as homo and/or hetero dimers. Anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 members are upregulated in tumors that contributes to apoptosis resistance while depletion of Mcl1, an anti-apoptotic member, resulted in senescence [49]. Thus, GRIM-19 can reduce Stat3-driven transcription of Bcl-2 members leading to growth suppression. Indeed, STAT3 protein is either over expressed or constitutively-activated in many cancers while GRIM-19 expression is lost in many cancers (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

GRIM-19 controls cellular growth. GRIM-19 interacts with STAT3 TAD to block STAT3-driven transcription of genes involved in apoptosis resistance and cell proliferation. GRIM-19 interacts with p16Ink4A to strengthen the blockade on CDK4 imposed by p16Ink4A alone. Thus the activator, cyclin-D1, cannot promote G1-S transition as RB protein is not phosphorylated to relieve the inhibition on E2F1. GRIM-19 interacts with OLFM-4 to inhibit oxidative stress response genes during S phase of the cell cycle. Blue arrows represent stimulation of transcription. Red arrows represent biochemical events. Blunt red bars represent inhibition.

Table 1.

Expression level and mutational status of GRIM-19 in human cancers.

Tissue of tumor origin Tumor (Normal) Protein RNA DNA Mutation(s) Reference
Thyroid (Hurthle cell tumor) 5 (5) - - 5 K5N, R115P [122]
Kidney (RCC) 40 (40) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [120]
Splicing defect LF - ↓ qRT- PCR - [219]
Prostate 17 (17) ↓ IHC - - [120]
Prostate (Carcinoma) Details not available ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [220]
Urinary bladder 6 (6) NS - - [120]
Gastro-intestinal 63 (63) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [221]
Gastro-intestinal (Stomach) 32 (32) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [222]
Gastro-intestinal (CRC) 39 (39) ↓ IHC ↓ qRT- PCR - [223]
Lung (NSCLC) 49 (49) ↓ IHC - - [224]
Lung (ADC) 37 (37) ↓ WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [225]
15 ↓ IHC - - [226]
Lung (SCLC) 10 ↓ IHC - - [226]
Lung (SCC) 16 ↓ IHC - -
Cervix (Carcinoma) 20 (15*) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [72]
60 (45*) ↓ WB - - [99]
Details not available ↓ IHC - - [227]
Ovary 240 (46*) ↓ IHC, WB - - [228]
Nervous system 34 (4*) LF - ↑ qRT- PCR - [229]
Nervous system (Gliomas) 58 (5) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [230]
Liver (Carcinoma) 55 (55) ↓ IHC, WB ↓ qRT- PCR - [231]
Liver (Carcinoma) 83 (91) - ↓ qRT- PCR - [232]
Liver (Carcinoma) 54 (54) ↓ IHC - - [233]
Adrenal 14 ↓ IHC, WB - - [234]
Breast 128 (20) ↓ IHC, WB - - [121]
Head & Neck (SCC) 12 (12) - ↑ qRT-PCR 3 L71P, L91P, A95T [46]
HeLa cells - Yes Yes K7E (Heterozygous) Nallar and Kalvakolanu (unpublished)
HSC2 and HSC3 cells - Yes Yes Y143→ Stop (Homo)
HN-12 cells - Yes Yes D9E (Homo)
Kidney - No Yes S31L, R57C COSMIC database$
Lung - No Yes Y33C, R81L
Colon - No Yes R115C, G139S
Uterus (Endometrium) - No Yes T144M
Skin (Melanoma) - No Yes R82K
*

- unmatched tissue, LF - longer human GRIM-19 transcript,

$

- 19,717 tumor DNA samples sequenced and mutations were heterozygous.

Effects of GRIM-19 on cell motility

A transcription-independent function for STAT3 in cell migration was also described. STAT3 interacted with Stathmin (STMN1), a microtubule disassembly factor, and promoted stability of microtubules [50]. Microtubules are polymers made from equimolar α and β tubulin monomers. Microtubules are rapidly dissociating and re-associating structures involved in multiple cellular functions including cell division and motility. Numerous post-translational modifications that occur on microtubules control their half-life and function (see [51] for a review). Apart from these modifications, the c-terminal amino acid (tyrosine) of α-tubulin is subject to periodic enzymatic removal and addition on polymerized microtubules. Removal of this tyrosine exposes the preceding glutamate residue, referred to as Glu-tubulin, and this is believed to stabilize such microtubules i.e., a longer half-life. Removal of this glutamate residue renders the process irreversible and is known to occur in neurons [52]. Tubulin-containing microtentacles were reported to be essential for cancer cell metastases [53]. At present, whether GRIM-19 affects this process in epithelial-derived cancers is not known. However, in v-Src-transformed fibroblasts there was a slight decrease in the intensity of Glu-tubulin i.e., microtubules are relatively more dynamic. Upon, GRIM-19 expression the intensity of Glu-tubulin was similar to the non-transformed parental cells [54]. Additionally, a significant reduction in the size of the nucleus in v-Src-transformed fibroblasts occurred, which could be attributed to cytoskeletal changes. Src activity in cells is kept silent by c-terminal Src kinase (CSK), a tyrosine kinase that phosphorylates Src at its c-terminal Y530/535 residue [55, 56]. In the steady state, tyrosyl phosphorylation of this residue inactivates Src tyrosine kinase. Unlike the parental Src, v-Src lacks the c-terminal region, where this critical regulatory tyrosine is present. Since v-Src lacks this site, Csk is unlikely to mediate the inhibitory effects of GRIM-19 on v-Src. In contrast, a novel Src inhibitory mechanism is exerted by a Csk-binding protein, known as phosphoprotein associated with glycosphingolipid-enriched microdomains 1 (Pag1). Pag1/Csk, complex in lipid rafts, promotes Src inhibition by phosphorylating the Y530/535 residue [57]. Interestingly, a recent study has shown that Pag1 alone blocks Src activity, independently of Csk [58, 59], by binding to the SH2 domain of active Src and retaining it in lipid rafts to blunt Src-driven oncogenesis. Indeed, Pag1−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were readily transformed by v-Src, which was reversed by restoring Pag1 expression. Importantly, CBP/PAG1 mRNA is down regulated in tumor cells expressing active Src [58]. Consistent with such observations, we noticed a strong down regulation of Pag1 mRNA in v-Src-transformed fibroblasts, which was prevented by GRIM-19 [60]. Thus, GRIM-19 appears to indirectly inhibit v-Src activity through PAG1.

Down regulation of Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins (IAPs)

IAPs inhibit Caspases, which drive apoptosis. IAPs were first identified in baculoviruses and later in insects and mammals. The presence of one or more baculoviral IAP-like repeat(s) (BIRC) is a characteristic of all IAPs. In mammalian cells, IAPs prevent the activation of Caspases by blocking their active sites. Apart from this classical function, now there is ample evidence to believe that IAPs are involved in other cellular processes such as innate immunity and chromosomal segregation (see [61] for a review). The X-linked IAP (XIAP; BIRC4) blocks Caspases 3, 7 and 9. XIAP and other IAPs are in turn targeted to destruction by IAP inhibitors like second mitochondrial activator of caspases (SMAC, also known as DIABLO) and high temperature requirement protein A2 (HTRA2) [62]. HTRA2, a serine protease located in the mitochondrial IMS, cleaves XIAP to relieve the inhibition on Caspase-9 (Fig. 2). By a physical association, GRIM-19 augmented HTRA2-driven XIAP cleavage [35]. The PDZ domain of HTRA2 and the c-terminal region of GRIM-19 were essential for such interactions. IFN/RA stimulation strongly increased HTRA2/GRIM-19 interaction, suggestive of some post-translational modification. Indeed, a dynamic phospho-T113 modification on GRIM-19 was reported using mass spectrometry [63]. The functional consequence(s) of this modification, or lacking, is unclear at present. We have shown earlier that R115P, found in a certain Hürthle cell thyroid tumor was significantly incapable to blocking STAT3-driven cell growth and gene expression [64]. Curiously, this site is separated by one amino acid from T113. Whether R115P affects modifications at T113 of GRIM-19; and has any bearing on HtrA2 or STAT3 interactions needs to be determined. HTRA2 is upregulated in response to heat shock and/or Tunicamycin treatment and cancer cell lines do not lose expression of HTRA2 protein [65]. Additionally, HTRA2 is also involved in mitochondrial protein quality control in the nervous system as mice lacking Htra2 protein, in neurons, showed Parkinson’s-like disease [66].

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

GRIM-19 induces degradation of oncoproteins. In high-risk HPV positive cancers, E6-E6AP complex promotes destruction of the p53 tumor suppressor and induces transcription of TERT gene. GRIM-19 interacts with E6 to prevent proteasomal destruction of p53. E6AP undergoes degradation upon binding GRIM-19. By preventing E6-E6AP complex formation, GRIM-19 maintains low levels of TERT protein. TERT activity is needed to maintain telomere length and for cancer cells to attain replicative immortality. Overexpression of XIAP is observed in many cancers. XIAP protein ubiquitylates pro-Caspase-9 that targets it for proteasomal destruction. GRIM-19 augments the proteolytic activity of HTRA2 to degrade XIAP and thus relieves the inhibition on pro-Caspase-9. Red arrows represent biochemical or signaling events.

Another IAP member that is over expressed in cancer cells is Survivin (HGCN symbol: BIRC5). Survivin protein is expressed during embryonic development, and undetectable in terminally-differentiated resting cells, peaks at G2-M phase of the cell cycle (see [67] for a review). Survivin localizes to the spindle assembly due to its interaction with microtubules. Mouse embryos lacking Birc5 gene die prior to the implantation stage [68] similar to embryos that lacked intact Grim-19 alleles [69]. Since, cancer cells undergo repeated cell division, Survivin is necessary for cancer cells to complete mitosis. In gynecological tumors, destruction of p53 leading to higher levels of BIRC5 mRNA and replicative advantage was suggested [70, 71]. In primary cervical tumors, we have shown Survivin levels inversely correlated with GRIM-19 levels [72]. There was a strong correlation between STAT3 and Survivin protein levels in primary cervical tumors and xenografted cervical cancer cells expressing GRIM-19 had a lower BIRC5 expression. Mitochondrial Survivin protein was recently suggested to drive oxidative phosphorylation [73] through RC-2 i.e., succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), similar to an earlier report of STAT3 driving such a process [74]. Interestingly, acetylated Survivin interacted with STAT3 in the nucleus to inhibit transcription of a few SIE-motif containing genes viz., BCL-XL and MCL1 while it did not prevent transcription from others viz., MYC, VEGF, CCND1 and MMP9 [75]. Whether similar mechanisms operate in other cancers is not known at present. Given that BIRC5 gene encodes 4 known protein isoforms; relative abundance of such isoforms and post-translational modifications on them will greatly influence cellular properties and responses.

Cell cycle control

CDKN2A (p16INK4A), a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor, is one of the most frequently mutated tumor suppressor genes [76]. This gene produces two alternatively spliced mRNAs that code for two completely different proteins viz., p14/19ARF and p16INK4A. The former interacts with MDM2 to relieve inhibition on p53 while the latter suppress the activity of CDKs 2, 4 and 6. Recently, we have shown an interaction between p16INK4A and GRIM-19 using a proteomic approach [37]. When co-expressed, GRIM-19/p16INK4A synergistically suppressed cell cycle progression by inhibiting E2F1-driven gene expression. GRIM-19/p16INK4A complex tightly associated with CDK4 and prevented the binding of cyclin D1 (the activator) with CDK4 (Fig. 1). The p16INK4A protein contains four Ankyrin-like repeats (ARs) domains necessary for its interactions with other cellular proteins, foremost of which are the CDKs. We demonstrated that the N-terminal region of GRIM-19 interacted with the 4th AR of murine p16Ink4A [37]. The CDKN2A gene suffers multiple point mutations [77] some of which incapacitate its CDK-inhibitory function. The 1st and 2nd ARs of p16INK4A, required for CDK inhibition, are frequently mutated in several human cancers. However, the significance of mutations in the 4th AR, a domain not required for CDK4 inhibition, was unclear. Our studies showed that mutations in the 4th AR, found in certain human adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of lung, prevented the interactions between p16INK4A and GRIM-19 [37]. This seems to lead to an inefficient CDK4 inhibition, which permits cell cycle progression.

OLFM4 (GW112), an extra-cellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein from the Olfactomedin family, is abundantly expressed in inflamed colonic mucosa, gastric, pancreatic and colorectal cancers [34] and promoted growth of sub-cutaneously implanted syngeneic mouse prostate cancer cells. A later study suggested that this protein promoted S-phase transition in pancreatic cancer cells [78]. Even though the region(s) involved in binding was not mapped, interaction occurred primarily in the mitochondria when both proteins were over expressed (Fig. 1). Olfm4 gene-deleted mice develop normally and do not show a discernible phenotype [79]. In a gastric cancer cell line, expression of GRIM-19 suppressed GW112 levels in addition to VEGF, MMPs 2 and 9. Similar to GRIM-19 acting as an inhibitor of STAT3, this study suggested GRIM-19 could also inhibit NF-κB activation using an in vitro assay [80]. However, other reports have argued OLFM4 to be a tumor suppressor in murine melanoma [81] and human prostate cancer [82]. Hence, the role of OLFM4 in other cancers needs to be critically evaluated. Later studies have demonstrated OLFM4 to regulate innate immune responses. Reduced colonization by Helicobacter pylori in mice lacking Olfm4 gene suggested Olfm4 to be an inhibitor of mucosal immunity [79]. Subsequent studies by the same group demonstrated Olfm4 inhibited cathepsin-C and in the absence of Olfm4 protein, neutrophil-driven innate immune responses against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli [83] increased significantly but not against Aspergillus fumigatus [84]. In summary, it is not clear why and how an ECM protein exerts a prominent role in nuclear transcription and the physiologic relevance in such contexts.

Innate anti-bacterial responses induce GRIM-19

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are crucial for detecting pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and activating appropriate counter measures to control the invader. In vertebrates, the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) [85], C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) [86], Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) like receptors (NLRs) [87] and Retinoic acid-inducible gene (RIG)-like receptors (RLRs) [88] detect distinct molecular signatures to activate innate immune responses. The intracellular NLR NOD2 recognizes bacterial muramyl dipeptide and activates NF-κB to boost innate immune responses [89]. Members of the TLR family and RIPK2 (a serine-threonine kinase), are believed to be important in this signaling cascade. RIPK2 is necessary for innate and acquired immune responses and the c-terminal caspase-recruitment domain (CARD) may be important for this function. Even though the GRIM-19 residues crucial for interaction with NOD2 are not known, the N-terminal CARD15 domain of NOD2 was not required for this interaction [36]. Surprisingly, cytoplasmic GRIM-19 could protect host cells by decreasing the survival of intracellular Salmonella typhimurium. This study showed an interaction in situ using over-expressed proteins. In non-immune cells, intra-cellular S. typhimurium could up regulate GRIM-19 mRNA levels whereas non-pathogenic E. coli did not. In vitro cultured human macrophage-like cells up regulated GRIM-19 protein level when challenged by purified cell wall fraction of Mycobacterium bovis BCG [90]. In peripheral blood-derived monocytes, however, only a live bacterium (Porphyromonas gingivalis) not it’s LPS or fimbrial proteins, could up regulate GRIM-19 protein levels [91]. Aged Grim-19+/− male mice were prone to spontaneous obstructed urinary tract infection, mostly by Staphylococcus saprophyticus [92] compared to wild-type mice. Such an innate immune response is also conserved in insects as a differential response and enrichment of GRIM-19 expressed sequence tags were observed in hemocytes from mosquitoes (Armigeres subalbatus and Aedes aegypti) when challenged with E. coli and Micrococcus luteus [93]. Thus, GRIM-19 may serve as an anti-bacterial protein by stimulating cytokine synthesis through the “Inflammasome”. This ability of intracellular bacteria may have contributed to their anti-tumor effects as we noted that naïve S. typhimurium reduced tumor growth compared to mock inoculations [94]. We have also shown that recombinant S. typhimurium carrying plasmids encoding STAT3-specific shRNAs strongly reduced tumor burden and metastases [94]. In these experiments, upregulation of GRIM-19 along with blunting of STAT3 appear to occur simultaneously. A recent study reported delivery of GRIM-19 to tumors, using attenuated S. typhimurium, inhibited growth of xenografted tumors better than individual agents in murine hosts [95]. It is still not clear as to how GRIM-19 is induced by PRR-initiated signaling in a very short time given that it takes a much longer time for GRIM-19 to be induced by RA/IFN-β [2] or a high dose of IFN-β alone in non-immune cells (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Inducers and inhibitors of GRIM-19. GRIM-19 was discovered as an IFN-inducible gene product. Stimulation of NOD2, TLR2 and/or TLR4 upregulates GRIM-19 transcription. The complete mechanism of transcriptional induction is not known currently. Viruses evade apoptosis of infected cells by multiple mechanisms. One such common mechanism adopted by viruses is to inhibit GRIM-19. Specific viral gene products employed are shown next to red bars. Blue arrows represent stimulation of transcription. Blunt red bars represent inhibition.

Inhibition of GRIM-19 by viruses

Viruses employ several strategies to attenuate, subvert or evade host innate immune responses. Human herpesvirus-8 encoded gene products like vIL-6, vBcl2 and vIRFs are classic examples of this type [96]. Viral IRF1 (vIRF1), encoded by the human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8), inhibits IFN gene expression by preventing with the interaction of CBP/p300 with co-activator IRF3. Since GRIM-19 is an IFN-inducible gene product (Fig. 3), blocking IFN synthesis gives time for the virus to take control of the cellular machinery. Additionally, vIRF1 also binds to GRIM-19 and prevents its ability to induce apoptosis [97]. A closely related human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B) employs a different protein, U95, to block GRIM-19-induced apoptosis [98]. The E6 protein of high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) binds to GRIM-19, but E6 protein from the low-risk strains does not [97]. More importantly, in primary cervical cancers, loss of GRIM-19 associated with a loss of p53 protein [99]. The HPV E6 oncoprotein alters the specificity of a host ubiquitin ligase E6AP (HGCN symbol: UBE3A) to accept p53 as a substrate [100] for ubiquitylation that is degraded by the proteasome. In high-risk HPV-positive cancer cell lines, GRIM-19 prevented the association of HPV-18 E6 with E6AP to form a complex and restored p53 protein levels [99] to induce apoptosis (Fig. 2). Interestingly GRIM-19 could induce the auto-ubiquitylation of E6AP to be degraded by the proteasome [99] (Fig. 2). Additionally, E6-E6AP complex can induce transcription of the telomerase gene (HGCN symbol: TERT) to maintain chromosomal end stability [101] and hence replicative immortality. In our recent report, we have shown that TERT levels inversely correlated with GRIM-19 levels in primary cervical SCCs [102]. Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) employs a non-coding RNA (β2.7) to prevent release of GRIM-19 from mitochondria [103]. Viral mutants lacking β2.7 were unable to prevent apoptosis. Even though the entry of β2.7 into the mitochondria was reported to be independent of viral protein factors, the mechanism still remains elusive as to how large nucleic acids can traverse mitochondrial membranes. Vaccinia virus was reported to downregulate GRIM-19 mRNA as early as 2h post infection and such low levels were maintained for as long as 16h [104]. The factors involved in GRIM-19 down regulation are not known. In summary, a majority of the DNA viruses block GRIM-19 for promoting the survival of virus-infected or virus-transformed cells (Fig. 3).

The mitochondrial function of GRIM-19

The mammalian RC-1, comprised of ~46 distinct proteins [105], is the largest of RCs. However, only 14 proteins in this complex are critical for catalysis i.e., electron transport and proton pumping. Seven each of these proteins originate from the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes. Bacteria by far have the simplest RC-1, that is embedded in the plasma membrane and pumps protons into the periplasmic space to drive oxidative phosphorylation i.e., ATP synthesis. However, bacterial RC-1, the prototype, contains only 14 proteins with catalytic activity; same as in simpler eukaryotes to highly complex mammalian cells. This raises a question - why does the mammalian RC-1 contain additional proteins that have no catalytic activity? A probable answer is that mammalian RC-1 catalytic core (14 proteins) is smaller in size compared to bacterial RC-1 and the additional 32-plus ‘accessory proteins’, may be required to stabilize this complex. Experimental approaches to address this question have not yielded convincing answers yet, as removal of even a single ‘accessory protein’ drastically interfered with the maturation of mammalian RC-1 and triggered cell death [69, 106]. Additionally, low levels of mature RC-1 due to mutational inactivation of assembly factors manifested as cell death [107, 108] or tissue-restricted vulnerability [109] or kinetic alterations [110]. A bewildering situation is seen in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) that lacks ‘true’ RC-1 and GRIM-19 orthologue; yet it does not exhibit defects in oxidative phosphorylation or cell viability. This observation suggests that cells can compensate mitochondrial NAD+/NADH redox reaction by other mechanisms. A recent study showed transgenic expression of Ndi1, the alternative NADH dehydrogenase in S. cerevisiae, could rescue the embryonic lethal phenotypes of Caenorhabditis elegans depleted of RC-1 proteins and such worms were rotenone insensitive like the yeast enzyme [111]. In an earlier study, Ndi1 was found to protect cardiomyocytes from ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury-induced damage [112]. During IR, mitochondrial dysfunction, especially RC-1, generates ROS that is toxic to cells. We reported that GRIM-19 was upregulated during focal ischemia-induced damage in rat brain [113] [113][2][2]and neurons were more sensitive compared to glial cells. Whether such mechanisms mentioned above would suppress cancer cell growth needs to be critically examined.

Structural studies have shown that RC-1 is conforms into an ‘L’ shaped structure [105]. The hydrophobic arm of RC-1, composed of the proton-translocating subunits (7 proteins; ND1, 2, 3, 4, 4L, 5 and 6) encoded by the mitochondrial genome in eukaryotes, is embedded in the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM). The hydrophilic arm (7 proteins; NDUFS1, 2, 3, 7, 8 and NDUFV1, 2) that projects into the mitochondrial matrix contains the redox centers necessary for electron transport. A recent single-particle electron cryo-microscopic analysis mapped a trans-membrane helix of GRIM-19 wrapping ND1 while NDUFA8 formed an L-shaped clip over GRIM-19 [114]. Using dissociative methods, however, GRIM-19 was demonstrated to be a part of sub complexes 1α or 1β, while ND1 was in sub complex 1λ [115]. Further studies are needed to ascertain the spatial relationship among the RC-1 subunits. Mammalian RC-1 was shown to be assembled in a modular fashion in immortalized cell lines using an epitope-tagged protein [115]. If the same mechanism operates in normal cells needs to be evaluated. Functional consequences of an ‘accessory protein’ depletion manifests as drastic reduction in mature RC-1 levels concomitant with accumulation of submodules or intermediates. A very low level of mature RC-1 is insufficient to maintain effective transmembrane potential and, as a result, triggers cell death [116]. Consistent with this notion, direct deletion of mouse Grim-19 gene revealed an embryonic lethal phenotype [69] as no viable embryos were recovered beyond the implantation stage i.e., blastocyst. Mitochondria are important for calcium homeostasis, especially in excitable tissues like neurons and muscles. A morpholino-based GRIM-19 depletion disrupted calcium signaling in Xenopus laevis embryos that led to defective heart development [117]. We have shown that conditional deletion of Grim-19 in adult mouse skin does not cause significant lethality. However, these mice are highly prone to chemically-induced tumor development [118]. Even, a mono-allelic loss was sufficient for tumor development. A significant decline of mitochondrial electron transport machinery viz., RC-2, RC-4 (cytochrome’c oxidase) and RC-5 (ATP synthase) and a modest increase in RC-3 (cytochrome’c reductase) levels occurred in the absence of GRIM-19 [118]. These are consistent with a strong decline in oxygen consumption in these cells. A recent study reported that GRIM-19 point mutation R57H in two sisters of family, was associated with the development of hypotonia, dyskinesia and sensorial deficiencies, including a severe optic neuropathy [119]. These patients have been shown to have RC-1 instability and defects in mitochondrial electron transport. Thus, GRIM-19 plays a prominent role in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation.

Functional consequences of GRIM-19 defects: their relevance to cancer

Based on several independent studies in many types of tumors, advanced tumors express extremely low level of GRIM-19 protein compared to benign tumors (Table 1). GRIM-19-deficient tumors express high STAT3 levels and STAT3-responsive gene products compared to adjacent normal tissue. Notably, elevated mRNA expression level of anti-apoptotic Bcl2 family members were noticed in these samples [46, 72, 120, 121]. GRIM-19 is required for the inhibition of STAT3-induced oncogenic gene expression is a common observation from these studies (Table 1). The mitotic cyclins and CDKs were also elevated, due to loss of CDK inhibitors. The negative regulators of tumor suppressors were elevated leading to negligible growth-suppressive protein levels. Mutational inactivation (genetic deletions or point mutations) or epigenetic suppression of tumor suppressor genes is commonly observed in human cancers. Compared to the frequency of mutant TP53 and CDKN2A, mutation(s) in genes encoding mitochondrial ETC proteins are rare. Mutant GRIM-19 gene is represented at a lesser frequency in COSMIC database at the time of writing this article (Table 1). It should be noted that GRIM-19 genetic alterations may not have been documented, owing to a lack of deeper analyses of human tumors for GRIM-19 at this time. In addition, relative to TP53 and CDKN2A, GRIM-19 is new player on the arena. It is expected that future studies will identify more genetic alterations and provide vignettes of GRIM-19 as a major tumor suppressor. We have studied the functional consequences of 5 tumor-derived mutations in vitro and in vivo. Two point mutations (K5N and R115P) were reported in thyroid tumors by genomic DNA sequencing [122]. We have analyzed numerous kidney, head and neck SCC (HNSCC), cervical and prostate tumors using patient-matched normal controls at the RNA, DNA and protein levels for GRIM-19, STAT3 and other growth-regulatory genes. We identified three GRIM-19 point mutations (L71P, L91P and A95T) in a HNSCC cohort [46] who had long history of tobacco usage (Table 1). In addition, human cancer cell lines harbor a unique GRIM-19 mutation (Table 1). The ENSEMBL database lists D9, L71 and L91 residues of GRIM-19 to be mutated, using low-resolution techniques, in tumor samples but the source was not described. We had reported the N-terminal QDMP motif, residues 8–11, of GRIM-19 to be important for its growth-regulatory effects [123], especially the D9 residue. We have observed this residue to be mutated in a HNSCC cell line (HN-12) which we recently obtained. HeLa cells harbor K7E mutation in a heterozygous state while HNSCC cell lines (HSC2 and HSC3) lack c-terminal two amino acids due to a mutation in codon 143 (TAC → TAG; Y → Stop) leading to premature translational termination. The point mutations described in COSMIC database are of a heterozygous nature obtained by high-resolution DNA sequencing. Two point mutations, R57C and R115C, mentioned in the COSMIC database appear to be very interesting for a protein that lacks cysteine residues. Such a mutation could potentially subject GRIM-19 protein for thiol-redox regulation in an intra-molecular and/or inter-molecular fashion.

Certain cancers e.g., renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas show a unique mutational spectrum. Point mutations in TCA cycle enzymes and/or mitochondrial OXPHOS coding genes are common feature. A mutation in fumarate hydratase (FH) is characteristic of papillary-type RCC [124] while subunit C [125] or D [126] of SDH is mutated in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. These genes are rarely mutated in other cancers. Our report of GRIM-19 loss-of-expression in RCC using mass spectrometry [120] and other quantitative methods added a new dimension to mitochondrial dysfunction in this cancer. By analyzing tumor and patient-matched adjacent normal tissue, clear cell RCC samples had severe loss of GRIM-19 expression compared to other types of RCCs and/or urogenital tumors. Since most of these samples came from sporadic cases, tumorigenic events appear to be independent of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein. VHL is an ubiquitin ligase that marks the labile component of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) for degradation during normoxia [127]. HIFs are transcription factors activated by low oxygen concentration (reviewed in [128]). Functional HIF-1 is a heterodimer consisting of HIF-1α and HIF-1β (HGNC symbol: ARNT) proteins while HIF-2 is composed of HIF-2α and HIF-2β (HUGO symbol: ARNT2). The alpha subunit of HIF-1 and HIF-2 are rapidly and constantly degraded when sufficient oxygen is available, while the beta subunits are not. When oxygen is present, alpha subunits are hydroxylated by specific prolyl-hydroxylases (PHDs) at critical proline residues leading to ubiquitination by VHL and destruction by the proteasome. Low oxygen levels inactivate the PHDs leading to the stabilization of HIF-1 and HIF-2. The gene products regulated by HIF-1 or HIF-2 are important for cells to survive periods of oxygen deprivation (see [128] for additional details). In addition to some of the glycolytic enzymes upregulated by HIF-1 [129, 130], modifying RC-4 (cytochrome’c oxidase; also known as COX) activity appears to be a prominent response to hypoxia [131]. During hypoxia, HIF-1 upregulates transcription of two genes viz., Lonp1 and Cox4i2. Lonp1 is a protease that degrades Cox4i1 in the IMS to be subsequently replaced by Cox4i2. Interestingly oxidized aconitase, an enzyme in the mitochondrial matrix, is also degraded by Lonp1 [132]. Whether such changes improves mitochondrial ETC efficiency or prevents ROS generation or decreases cellular respiration rate during hypoxia has not been critically examined.

GRIM-19 mutations: influence on cancer cell characteristics

We have studied how tumor-derived mutant GRIM-19 proteins affect cellular functions when ectopically expressed in cell lines that have low levels of endogenous GRIM-19 protein. When a mutant GRIM-19 is expressed, cells grow rapidly compared to cells expressing wild-type GRIM-19. We have shown by in vitro and in vivo experiments that mutant GRIM-19-expressing cells have higher levels of cell-cycle associated gene products like cyclins D1, B1, CDKs, DHFR, TK1 etc [37, 46, 123]. Importantly, GRIM-19 point mutants do not interact as strongly as wild-type GRIM-19 does with STAT3. Since STAT3 cannot be blocked efficiently by mutant GRIM-19, cell growth was not restrained by them. Even though these point mutations are well separated in the primary sequence, whether they appear to contribute to the STAT3-interacting surface or contact points.

Cell survival

Many oncogenic transcription factors, like HIF-1α, NF-κB, E2F1, DP1 etc, are also up regulated during tumor progression and are required for transcriptional induction of genes involved in cell division. Aberrantly high STAT3 activity in cancer cells can be due to EGFR gene amplification or loss of feedback inhibitors like SOCS3, PIAS3 and GRIM-19. The Src protein, a non-receptor tyrosine kinase (NTK), localizes to plasma membrane and associates with different proteins. Src activity is controlled by phosphorylation of two residues in its kinase domain i.e., the c-terminal region. Phosphorylation of the Tyr416 (419 in humans and 424 in rodents) renders the kinase active while phosphorylation of the Tyr527 (530 in humans and 535 in rodents) renders the kinase inactive. As v-Src lacks the last ~11 amino acids, it can function as a strong (Tyr416 is phosphorylated) kinase and escapes negative regulation by CSK. Although Src is not mutated at high frequency in human tumors, Src activities increase as tumors progress. Solid tumors cannot grow beyond a particular size due to limited nutrient availability. Due to the low oxygen saturation in tumors (>50mm3), HIF-1α gets stabilized and tumors start secreting high levels of VEGF to form new blood vessels, which helps them to grow and metastasize [133]. Upon nutrient availability, nucleic acid biosynthetic enzymes (DHFR, TK1 etc) are upregulated leading to cell proliferation. At this time, matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) are also secreted to reshape the tumor microenvironment [134]. STAT3 and HIF-1α are known to drive up transcription of certain MMPs and induce blood vessel formation (see [135] for a review). We have shown a significant suppression of new blood vessels in xenografted tumors expressing GRIM-19, relative to the control tumors without GRIM-19 [72]. GRIM-19 also suppressed MMP expression in these tumors. One of the substrate for MMP-7 is the FAS ligand (FASL) [136]. Membrane-bound FASL induces apoptosis while the soluble FASL is known to be mitogenic to cancer cells (see [137] for a review). In addition, MMP-7 activates MMP-2 and MMP-9 to promote matrix degradation [138]. Thus a decrease in MMP-7 could have directly halted mitogenic signaling and invasion.

Cell proliferation

As mentioned earlier, cyclin-bound CDKs phosphorylate retinoblastoma (RB) and RB-like proteins [139] to remove the inhibition on E2F1 transcription factor. Removal of RB releases E2F1 protein and its association with DP1 to form transcriptional complexes at specific gene promoters of genes involved in G1-S phase transition [140]. This check point is also regulated by inhibitors of CDKs, comprising the CDKN1 (Cip and Kip) and CDKN2 (Ink4) family members (see [141] for a review). Many cancers lose expression of these tumor suppressors [142]. Loss of interaction(s), with cyclins and/or CDKs, due to point mutations in the N-terminal and middle region of the protein was easier to observe. All CDKN2 members have Ankyrin-like repeats (ARs) in their tertiary structure. ARs are all α-helical structures composed of ~35-amino acid-long sequences that are arranged in anti-parallel fashion. Such repeat organization is believed to mediate protein-protein interactions. The significance of point mutations observed in the 4th AR and c-terminal region of p16INK4A was unclear. We showed that this region is important for interaction with other tumor suppressors, like GRIM-19. The impact of point mutations observed in glioblastomas and NSCLC (see [77] for complete list), the c-terminal region of human p16INK4A was analyzed in terms of GRIM-19 interaction. Tumor-derived p16INK4A mutants G139D and A147G failed to interact with GRIM-19 while mutants S140C and H142R significantly lost their ability to bind to GRIM-19, compared to wild-type p16INK4A protein [37]. Hence, cell cycle is not tightly controlled as the wild-type protein(s).

Cell motility

Cytoskeletal reorganization is necessary for cancer cell motility. Plasma membrane resident FAK and Src are important players in cancer cell adhesion and detachment [143]. Highly metastatic cells have weak contact with the substratum i.e., ECM, and detach readily [144]. This could also be due to a rapid turnover of focal contacts, which otherwise would keep them adherent. FAK activity is crucial for focal adhesion turnover while Src is dispensable for this process [145]. In v-Src-transformed cells, tyrosyl-phosphorylated FAK, paxillin and γ-catenin levels were higher than control cells that resulted in increased motility, and this occurred independently of STAT3. A dynamic actin network is controlled by many primary regulators in a spatio-temporal pattern (see [146] for a review). GRIM-19 controlled the actin regulators to suppress cytoskeletal remodeling. GRIM-19 controls the level of Cortactin, a secondary actin regulator. Src-mediated phosphorylation of Cortactin reduces its affinity for actin and Cortactin’s ability to stabilize Y-branched actin networks. This triggers reorganization of cortical actin networks (Fig. 4). Upon expression of wild-type GRIM-19 in v-Src-transformed cells, actin stress fibers were regenerated with a suppression of podosomes / filopodia / lamellipodia suggesting reversion to a non-transformed state [54]. This reversion was also accompanied by a reduction in phospho-Y416 v-Src levels without affecting total v-Src levels. Such suppression was not due to a physical interaction between v-Src and GRIM-19. The N-terminus of GRIM-19 was essential for this inhibitory process. As mentioned earlier, v-Src is not subject to negative regulation by CSK and the mechanism for reduced phospho-Y416 v-Src levels was enigmatic. Since, the Y416 residue is in the kinase domain, we first checked for negative regulators of tyrosine kinase signaling. Among the negative regulators of tyrosine kinase signaling, CBL family members were the first suspects. CBL proteins are ubiquitin ligases involved in cell signaling. Two CBL members, c-Cbl and Cbl-b, are expressed by all cell types while the third member Cbl-c is primarily expressed by epithelial cells. We initially hypothesized Cbl-mediated v-Src ubiquitination as a possible mechanism for the reduction in phospho-Y416 v-Src levels upon GRIM-19 expression. Instead a CSK-binding protein present in lipid rafts known as Pag1 suppressed active levels of v-Src (Fig. 4). Indeed, Pag1−/−MEFs showed an increased susceptibility to v-Src-induced transformation. It is likely that Pag1 physically interacts with Src in lipid rafts or microdomains before being targeted to specific plasma membrane foci. Therefore, a fraction of v-Src protein was sequestered from gaining the crucial phosphorylation on Y416 that makes the tyrosine kinase very active. Tumor- derived GRIM-19 mutants could not upregulate Pag1 levels like wild-type GRIM-19, leading to the persistence of v-Src activity and unabated cytoskeletal remodeling [60].

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

GRIM-19 prevents oncogene-induced migration. Proteins at focal adhesions are shown on the top left while the biochemical and transcriptional responses are shown on the left bottom. Right side shows the various cellular structures that can be differentiated under a light microscope. The mechanism of v-Src inhibition by GRIM-19 is shown in the central box. In the presence of wild-type GRIM-19, Pag1 levels are high that restricts the level of active v-Src. Blue arrows represent stimulation while blunt red bars represent inhibition.

Cell invasion

Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) is characteristic of tumor cells undergoing local invasion to lymph nodes or distant metastases. When epithelial cells begin to express more of mesenchymal genes concomitant with reduced expression of epithelial genes, the process of EMT ensues (see [147] for a review). This adaptation contributes two important advantages to transformed epithelial cells – 1) it makes them resistant to Anoikis, rapid death induced due to loss of interaction with the ECM [148], and 2) it allows them to migrate short distances from the site of origin [149]. With time, the migrated tumor cells acquire additional characteristics that transform them into aggressive state of growth and migration. Presence of Vimentin (mesodermal-type intermediate filament) and reduction in epithelial-type cadherin (HGCN symbol: CDH1; commonly known as E-Cad) are classic markers to score for EMT in situ. We have observed EMT-like changes in S3C-expressing HaCat cells (Nallar and Kalvakolanu, unpublished); the cells acquired a spindle shape and were less adherent. Consistent with this, upon expression of GRIM-19, in S3C-expressing cancer cell lines, metastatic spread and tumor burden were reduced in nude mice. Tumor-derived GRIM-19 mutants were less effective at controlling metastases compared to wild-type GRIM-19 [46]. Thus, GRIM-19 exerts anti-metastatic effects.

Loss of GRIM-19 increases susceptibility to tumor development

As a direct Grim-19 gene deletion is incompatible with mouse development, we have generated a genetically modified mouse in which Grim-19 gene could be conditionally deleted [118]. Grim-19 gene was deleted in the mouse skin using a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase. No spontaneous tumors developed in gene-deleted mice over a period of 18-plus months. However, these mice were prone to DMBA/TPA-induced skin carcinogenesis. Earlier tumor appearance, increased number and size of tumors were commonly observed in Grim-19-deficient mice compared to mice with two intact copies of Grim-19 allele. Importantly, mice with a mono-allelic loss of Grim-19 showed increased susceptibility to chemical carcinogenesis. Major findings of our study were presence of high nuclear cyclin D1 protein [150] and up regulated levels of membrane-associated β-catenin proteins [151] in Grim-19-deficient tumors [118]. In addition to phosphorylated Stat3, Ezh2 protein was up regulated in Grim-19-deficient tumors. Steady-state transcript levels of Sox2, cyclins B1 and D1, Cdk1, Dhfr and Bcl2-l1 levels were also up regulated. Glucose utilization was uncoupled from TCA cycle and more lactate was excreted by Grim-19-deficient cells. As mentioned previously, oxygen consumption decreased in Grim-19-deficient cells. Mitochondrial RC-3 levels increased in Grim-19-deficient cells while the levels of all other complexes (RC-1, -2, -4 and -5) decreased [118]. This observation is in agreement with similar defects observed in cancer cell lines [60]. To compensate for such changes, transcript levels of glycolytic enzymes Aldolase-A (Aldoa) and Pyruvate kinase M2 isoform (Pkm2) increased in Grim-19-deficient tumors. Interestingly, transcript levels coding for protein regulators of glycolytic enzymes viz., Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase (Pdk2) and Glucokinase regulator (Gckr) are also increased in Grim-19-deficient tumors. Treatment of Grim-19-deficient tumor-bearing mice with a Stat3 inhibitor blocked tumor growth indicating a prominent role for Stat3 in tumor development [118]. Also, the most common gene mutation documented in such skin tumors i.e., Ras members, was not altered following the loss of Grim-19.

As the tumor grows, cancer cells also face nutrient competition. Upon reaching a certain critical size at the primary site, the cells near the center of the mass experience low oxygen levels and reduced nutrient delivery and waste removal. Such cells either undergo a necrotic cell death or synthesize cell survival factors or enter into a state of quiescence (reviewed in [152]).

The first scenario of necrotic cell death induces tumor inflammation. Cell-derived proteins and nucleic acids act as inflammatory stimuli for the resident macrophages, promote the production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CCL2, CXCL1, CXCL8. This further leads to recruitment of other immune cells from systemic circulation and an array of cytokines are secreted further [153]. This process has the potential to remodel the tumor microenvironment. Inflammatory signals alter the tissue milieu by recruiting cells of immune system. Acute inflammatory reactions to bacterial presence in tumor microenvironment resulted in tumor lysis (see [154] for a review). GRIM-19 was upregulated during anti-bacterial responses and tumor lysis could be enhanced when such bacteria delivered GRIM-19 expression plasmid to the tumor [155]. However, GRIM-19 was not upregulated in chronic inflammatory conditions like arthritis [156] and IBD [36]. In such chronic conditions, a recent study showed a higher GRIM-19 level to be beneficial. In collagen-induced mouse arthritis model, GRIM-19 suppressed disease progression by decreasing Th-17 and increasing T-reg cell population [156] and inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 etc) levels were attenuated in such joints. In this study, GRIM-19 transgenic mice (C57BL/6 background) and GRIM-19 over expressed (DBA1/J background) by intra-venous or intra-muscular administrations of an expression vector were used.

Earlier publications demonstrated the presence of mitochondrial STAT3 in Ras-transformed cells [157], pro-B cells [158], mouse myocytes and hepatocytes [74]. In these studies the authors suggested STAT3 interacted with RC components to sustain or prevent defective oxidative phosphorylation. With the knowledge that these experiments were conducted in different cell types, these reports appear to contradict the function of STAT3-GRIM-19 interaction in mitochondria although all needed Ser727 to be phosphorylated. However, we have not observed mitochondrial STAT3 in our experiments to date (Kalakonda and Kalvakolanu, unpublished). More importantly, GRIM-19 is present in RC-1 at the expected stoichiometric level while the STAT3 protein was far less represented in heart mitochondrial preparations [159]. It seems STAT3 can regulate RC-1, -2 and -5 by a physical interaction. Thus, the relationship between mitochondrial STAT3 (only in some cell types) and GRIM-19 is not clear at this time. Importantly, it is not clear whether STAT3 in the mitochondria promotes tumor inflammation and whether this inactivates and/or polarizes immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.

In the second scenario of survival, due to lower oxygen availability, HIF-1α gets stabilized and secretion of vasculogenic growth factors (VEGF, PDGF, etc.) leads to angiogenic and/or neovascular programming [160]. Formation of new blood vessels helps deliver nutrients and drain waste products but also brings in oxygen that would destabilize HIF-1α. Hence, this process would work like an on-off switch depending on the status of negative regulators of HIF proteins. This process does remodel the tumor microenvironment extensively [161]. Clinically, these types of tumors exhibit aggressive behavior due to cyclical hypoxia. We have shown the inhibitory effect of GRIM-19 on STAT3-driven [72] and v-Src-driven [60] vasculogenesis.

In the third scenario of quiescence, or dormancy, all cellular processes are kept operational at a very minimal rate (see [162] for a review). Clinically, these type of tumors show chronic hypoxia. This would make them similar to resting stem-like cells that are resistant to standard radiotherapy or chemotherapy (see [163] for a review) due to diffusional barrier resulting in very low oxygen and drug levels, respectively. It is important to note that resistance in these cells is not due to a loss of apoptotic machinery. Asymmetric division by a few cancer cells in a tumor mass was recently described to result in cancer dormancy [164].

Another hall mark of many advanced tumors is aerobic glycolysis. Initially described by Otto Warburg, the Warburg effect describes a preferential derivation of energy by non-oxidative breakdown of glucose even when sufficient oxygen is present [165]. Later on, the Warburg hypothesis postulated that the driver of tumorigenesis was insufficient cellular respiration [166]. As our understanding of cellular metabolism has improved, an important requirement for cells to maintain a constant proliferative state is to minimize using glucose-derived carbons as an energy source i.e., to prevent pyruvate from entering the TCA cycle. Although this observation was made a century ago by Otto Warburg, defective mitochondria were blamed for “Aerobic Glycolysis”. Now it is becoming clearer that this metabolic adjustment primarily serves to support nucleic acid synthesis and subsequent cell division by routing glucose through the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) to provide ribose and sustain high nucleotide pool in cell culture conditions [167]. This pathway generates NADPH that could be used for membrane lipid synthesis and/or restore oxidized cellular components. An interesting question to ask is whether aerobic glycolysis i.e., lactate excretion, is temporally separated from nucleotide biosynthesis? We suggest that to divert glucose-derived carbon into biomass, a minimal buildup of lactate may be required to signal cells to start DNA synthesis and/or alternate uses of glucose in hexosamine synthesis.

Loss of GRIM-19 affects glycolytic gene expression

The first step of glycolysis catalyzed by hexokinase (HK) converting glucose to glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) is irreversible. In mammals, four genes that code for HKs (HK1, 2, 3 and 4 (HGCN symbol: GCK)) are expressed in a tissue-dependent manner with distinct enzymatic and regulatory properties (see [168] for a review). In cancer cells, HK2 is the dominant isozyme [169] and is induced by a variety of stress conditions, while HK1 serves a house-keeping function. In Grim-19 deleted primary MEFs or skin tumors, Hk1 and Hk2 transcript levels do not vary much compared to controls (Fig. 5). G6P can now enter into the PPP or isomerized to fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) in the second step of glycolysis catalyzed by phosphogluco-isomerase (PGI). Additional functions have been described for this protein (see [170] for a review). The next step in glycolysis is rate limiting where F6P is converted to fructose-1, 6-bisphosphate (FBP (1, 6)) catalyzed by phosphofructo-kinase (PFK). This reaction is controlled by multiple cofactors, regulatory proteins and pH (see [171] for a review). In mammals, three genes coding for PFKL (liver) PFKM (muscle) and PFKP (platelet) with tissue-enriched expression patterns and differences in enzymatic and regulatory properties are known [172]. In primary MEFs upon Grim-19 deletion, Pfkl transcript levels are high [118] while Pfkm and Pfkp do not vary much (Fig. 5). The PFKs need fructose-2, 6-bisphosphate (FBP (2, 6)), an allosteric activator produced by phosphofructo-kinase/fructose bisphosphatase (PFKFB), to generate FBP (1, 6) from F6P. In mammals four genes coding for PFKFB (1, 2, 3 and 4) are ubiquitously expressed with tissue-dependent high-low expression patterns (see [173] for a review). PFKFBs are mixed function enzymes i.e., a kinase and a phosphatase. This is believed to control the flux of F6P for catabolic or anabolic processes. In Grim-19 deleted primary MEFs, Pfkfb4 transcript levels are low [118] while the others are not affected (Fig. 5). Splitting FBP (1, 6) into two 3-carbon molecules viz., glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate (GAP (3)) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP), is catalyzed by aldolase (ALDO). In mammals two genes (ALDOA and ALDOC) are ubiquitously expressed while the third is liver-specific (ALDOB) [174]. ALDOA and ALDOC levels are highest in muscle and nervous tissues, respectively while other tissues have their unique ‘high or low’ expression patterns. In cancer cells, ALDOA expression is high [175]. In Grim-19 −/− skin tumors, Aldoa mRNA levels are high [118] (Fig. 5). The next reaction catalyzed by GAPDH is primarily dependent on the availability of NAD+. This is indirectly controlled by triose-phosphate isomerase (TPI) as the reaction equilibrium favors DHAP over GAP (3) [176]. So when enough NAD+ is available, GAP (3) is converted to bis-phosphoglycerate (BPG (1, 3)) by GAPDH. Cells have two ways of regenerating NAD+ viz., the glycerol-phosphate and malate-aspartate shuttle. Both shuttles need mitochondria to be functional. Depending on its cellular location, GAPDH has many other functions [177]. The first ATP molecule to be produced in glycolysis is catalyzed by phospho-glycerate kinase (PGK) producing 3-phosphoglycerate (PG (3)) from BPG (1, 3). In mammals, PGK1 is expressed by all cells while PGK2 is expressed only in the testis [178]. The PG (3) produced by PGK is isomerized to 2-phosphoglycerate (PG (2)) by phospho-glycerate mutase 2 (PGAM2) [179]. In mammals, PGAM1 expression is restricted to brain and testis while homologs PGAM4 and PGAM5 are expressed by most tissues. It is not exactly clear what PGAM4 and PGAM5 proteins do in the cell. In primary MEFs, upon Grim-19 deletion Gapdh, Pgk1 and Pgam2 transcript levels are not affected in a significant manner (Fig. 5). The dehydration of PG (2) yields phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), a reaction catalyzed by enolase (ENO). In mammals, three genes coding for ENO1 [180], ENO2 (nervous enriched) [181] and ENO3 (muscle enriched) [182] are known. In Grim-19 deleted primary MEFs, Eno3 transcript levels dropped steeply (Fig. 5). The next irreversible step in glycolysis is harnessing the energy stored in PEP in the form of ATP, a reaction catalyzed by pyruvate kinase (PK). In mammals, two PK genes give rise to four transcripts due to variations in splicing and all four isozymes have distinct biochemical and regulatory properties [183]. PKLR gene is differentially transcribed in liver and reticulocytes [184] to give PKL and PKR isozymes, respectively. In all other tissues, muscle-type PK (PKM) is expressed. Alternative splicing of PKM gene gives rise to PKM1 isozyme that is dominant in post-mitotic tissues while PKM2 is expressed during specific conditions [185]. As homotetramers, PKM catalyzes the oxidation of PEP to pyruvate and also generate an ATP molecule. PKM1 isoform strongly couples glycolysis to TCA cycle, while cancer cells use the PKM2 isoform to allow lactate buildup [186, 187]. However, PKM2 can exist as a dimer and appears to have protein kinase activity when ectopically expressed in cancer cell lines [188]. Here, the kinase activity of PKM2 [189] transferred the phosphate from PEP to many protein substrates assayed in vitro. Prominent substrates include STAT3 [190], MLC2, histone H3 [191], β-catenin [192] and ERK. Interestingly, one of the intermediates in purine biosynthesis was shown to activate the protein kinase function of PKM2 suggestive of a feed-forward mechanism [193]. PKM2, as a chaperone, activated the transcriptional function of HIF-1α [194]. Whether the native PKM2 protein also behaves in the same manner is not known. Recently, non-canonical functions for enzymes of the glycolytic pathway (see [195] for a review) have been described viz., promoting cell migration, as a transcription factor, as a transcriptional co-activator etc. Since these studies were performed by over-expressed proteins in different cancer cell lines, the physiological and pathological relevance need to be evaluated further. PKM2 is the dominant isozyme during cellular proliferation and also expressed by cancer cells. In Grim-19 deleted skin tumors, Pkm2 levels go up compared to control tumors [118]. Thus due to a collective imbalance of handling glycolytic carbon, the intermediary products can be channeled for various catabolic and/or anabolic processes (Fig. 5). Proliferating cancer cells in culture convert pyruvate into lactate, catalyzed by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) thereby regenerating NAD+. In mammals, three genes coding for LDHA (muscle-type), LDHB (heart-type) and LDHC (testis-type) are known [196]. The rest of the tissues express LDHA and LDHB to varying levels. The reaction catalyzed by LDHA favors the formation of lactate while LDHB favors the formation of pyruvate [197]. LDHA is overexpressed by numerous cancer types and cancer cell lines [198]. In Grim-19 deleted primary MEFs, Ldhb transcript levels dropped more than 50% (Fig. 5). Thus Grim-19 loss may have indirectly promoted Ldha as the dominant isozyme in cells when measured for lactate levels [118]. A committed step of pyruvate channeling into TCA cycle is catalyzed by pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH). PDH is a hetero-tetrameric enzyme [199] controlled by four PDH kinases (PDK1, 2, 3 and 4) [200] and two PDH phosphatases (PDP1 and 2) [201]. Phosphorylation of a PDH subunit by PDKs inhibit while removal of the phosphate by PDPs activate PDH activity. Pdk1 levels are increased in primary MEFs while Pdk2 levels are increased in Grim-19-deficient skin tumors [118] (Fig. 5). In contrast Pdk4 levels drop in Grim-19 deleted skin tumors [118] compared to control tumors (Fig. 5). PDH complex is known to promote differentiation and/or induce senescence-like state [202]. Thus by lowering PDH activity, cancer cells can overcome senescence and replicate unhindered.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Metabolic processes impacted by GRIM-19. Cellular GRIM-19 levels determine catabolic or anabolic fate of glucose. Major process affected due to GRIM-19 loss is shown in pink oval. Blue arrows represent processes activated in cancers. Most of these are derived from isotope tracing in cell culture models. Enzymes are shown inside rectangles. Enzymes affected due to GRIM-19 loss are shown in red font in yellow rectangles with a halo. Enzymes unaffected due to GRIM-19 loss are shown in grey rectangles. Double-headed arrow represents a reversible reaction while the arrow head size shows the direction of net flux in physiological conditions. Open black arrow represents stimulation and blunt red bars represent inhibition of activity. 1C denotes the 1-carbon transfer in nucleotide synthesis. GPD: Glycerol phosphate dehydrogenase, NNT: NAD(P) transhydrogenase. See text for additional details.

In a very simplified model of tumor growth, only an altered pH was necessary (see [203] for a review). The extracellular pH is normally more alkaline than the intracellular pH i.e., default pH. In tumors, the extracellular pH is more acidic than the intracellular pH i.e., reversed pH. This ‘reversed pH gradient’ was suggested to confer all advantages to tumor cells viz., proliferation, apoptosis evasion and enhanced migration. This reversal of pH also has consequences for efficacy and metabolism of anti-cancer drugs [204, 205]. In an acidic pH, drugs are unable to enter cells in the tumor microenvironment while normal cells become its unintended target causing toxic side effects. Even though lowered pH in the tumor microenvironment can prevent immune cells from attacking the tumor [206], an alternative model of metabolite competition was recently suggested to promote T cell hypo-responsiveness in the tumor [207]. As glucose is consumed by all cell types in the tumor, it appears that naïve T cells are unable to drive the rapid utilization of glucose i.e., aerobic glycolysis required for converting them to an activated T cell. This could be due to their inability to upregulate glucose and/or monocarboxylate transporters and compete with cancer cells that already have high levels of the same. Alternatively, excess lactate excreted by the cancer cells could contribute to the anti-proliferative and anergy of T cells. Interestingly, effector T cells and M1 macrophages that rely on glucose for their function are affected more than regulatory T cells and M2 macrophages that can sustain on alternate carbon sources (see [208] for a review). It is likely that competition for other nutrients is present in the tumor and the ability of immune cells to acquire them is also impaired when excess lactate is present.

Conclusions

Evolution of cancer involves multiple genetic and epigenetic alterations. Ten hallmark traits that confer an advantage for pre-cancerous cells to become clinically-relevant disease were recently postulated by Hanahan and Weinberg (Figure 6) [152]. Four of these traits viz., resisting cell death, evading growth suppression, maintaining sustained proliferative potential and attaining replicative immortality; do not directly hinder the function(s) of other non-cancerous cells per se in the tumor microenvironment. We know that GRIM-19 prevents three of these traits in cancer cell line models (Fig. 6). Two other traits viz., acquiring de novo mutations leading to rewired cellular energetics may be reliant on interactions with the tumor stroma. Wild-type GRIM-19 prevented the Warburg effect while mutant GRIM-19 could not prevent the same. The last four traits viz., tumor-promoting inflammation, invasive capacity, induction of neovasculature and avoiding immune destruction; do affect other cells in the tumor microenvironment. We and others have shown that GRIM-19 levels inversely correlated with metastatic spread in primary human tumors and blood vessel formation in vivo studies (Fig. 6). On similar lines, GRIM-19 point mutations were less efficient at preventing cell migration in vitro and in vivo strongly suggests the importance of GRIM-19 vis-à-vis mitochondrial OXPHOS in preventing advanced disease.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

GRIM-19 blocks tumorigenesis at multiple levels. The ten hallmarks of cancer proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg is depicted. The top portion of the figure shows cancer cell characteristics independent of the microenvironment while the bottom portion shows characteristics that are influenced by other cell cells in the tumor. GRIM-19 prevents STAT3-driven cancer cell responses in the tumor microenvironment. The most important function of GRIM-19 is to fine tune cellular energetics leading to cancer cell adaptation in the tumor microenvironment. Blue arrows represent stimulatory responses, broken black arrows represent significant alterations in function and blunt red bars represent inhibition. See text for additional details.

GRIM-19 controls cell cycle arrest, induction of apoptosis and innate immune responses [92] while evidence for GRIM-19 controlling acquired immune responses [156, 209] is emerging. The role of mitochondrial proteins in immune response is poorly understood. With the identification of NLRX1 (a RC-3-interacting protein) to induce innate immune responses against viruses [210], the role of mitochondrial RC proteins to augment immune responses against pathogens are being increasingly investigated. Importantly, the ability of mitochondria to constantly sustain ROS generation to kill microbes and ROS detoxification to protect cellular contents are crucial for cell survival. The inability of aged male Grim-19 heterozygous mice to mount immune responses against an opportunistic pathogen is a prime example for this [92]. Importantly, pharmacological inhibition of RC complexes prevented cytokine synthesis in bone marrow-derived macrophages. Curiously, it is unclear why female mice were not included in this study. Is this a sex-specific effect? The XIAP gene, mapping to X chromosome in human and mouse, could be a potential candidate that could influence the outcome. Mutations in XIAP were associated with reduced numbers of lymphocytes, the X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome (XLP) [211]. Later the importance of XIAP to innate immunity was demonstrated by the total loss of Nod signaling in Xiap-deficient cells [212, 213]. In humans, many patients with IBD had mutations in XIAP gene and suffered from systemic inflammation. These individuals, however, did not show symptoms of XLP [214, 215]. Interestingly, our RNA-Seq analysis had revealed that upon Grim-19 gene deletion, the most drastic changes occurred in genes involved in innate immune responses [118]. This raises an important question as to whether modulators of innate immune responses have partly overlapping roles in a cell/tissue-specific manner. Curiously enough, other IAPs are also intensely investigated for their role in innate immunity and inflammation (see [216] for a review). YM155, a small molecule inhibitor of Survivin [217] is being evaluated in clinical trials as an anti-cancer agent. The initial observation of mitochondrial Survivin [218] in cancer cell lines was recently shown to support mitochondrial repositioning, oxidative phosphorylation and invasion [73] using recombinant proteins. What role does GRIM-19 play in such a scenario remains to be examined.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Dunn GP, Koebel CM, Schreiber RD. Interferons, immunity and cancer immunoediting. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6:836–48. doi: 10.1038/nri1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Angell JE, Lindner DJ, Shapiro PS, Hofmann ER, Kalvakolanu DV. Identification of GRIM-19, a novel cell death-regulatory gene induced by the interferon-beta and retinoic acid combination, using a genetic approach. J Biol Chem. 2000;275:33416–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M003929200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pestka S, Krause CD, Walter MR. Interferons, interferon-like cytokines, and their receptors. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:8–32. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00204.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kotenko SV, Gallagher G, Baurin VV, Lewis-Antes A, Shen M, Shah NK, et al. IFN-lambdas mediate antiviral protection through a distinct class II cytokine receptor complex. Nat Immunol. 2003;4:69–77. doi: 10.1038/ni875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gresser I, Belardelli F. Endogenous type I interferons as a defense against tumors. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002;13:111–8. doi: 10.1016/s1359-6101(01)00035-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lindner DJ, Borden EC, Kalvakolanu DV. Synergistic antitumor effects of a combination of interferons and retinoic acid on human tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:931–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, Foster GR, et al. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:975–90. doi: 10.1038/nrd2422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ferrantini M, Capone I, Belardelli F. Interferon-alpha and cancer: mechanisms of action and new perspectives of clinical use. Biochimie. 2007;89:884–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2007.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nagai Y, Tsuchiya H, Runkle EA, Young PD, Ji MQ, Norton L, et al. Disabling of the erbB Pathway Followed by IFN-gamma Modifies Phenotype and Enhances Genotoxic Eradication of Breast Tumors. Cell Rep. 2015;12:2049–59. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.08.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Deng L, Liang H, Xu M, Yang X, Burnette B, Arina A, et al. STING-Dependent Cytosolic DNA Sensing Promotes Radiation-Induced Type I Interferon-Dependent Antitumor Immunity in Immunogenic Tumors. Immunity. 2014;41:843–52. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sistigu A, Yamazaki T, Vacchelli E, Chaba K, Enot DP, Adam J, et al. Cancer cell-autonomous contribution of type I interferon signaling to the efficacy of chemotherapy. Nat Med. 2014;20:1301–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.3708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shen YJ, Le Bert N, Chitre AA, Koo CX, Nga XH, Ho SS, et al. Genome-derived cytosolic DNA mediates type I interferon-dependent rejection of B cell lymphoma cells. Cell Rep. 2015;11:460–73. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xia X, Mai J, Xu R, Perez JE, Guevara ML, Shen Q, et al. Porous silicon microparticle potentiates anti-tumor immunity by enhancing cross-presentation and inducing type I interferon response. Cell Rep. 2015;11:957–66. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Legrier ME, Bieche I, Gaston J, Beurdeley A, Yvonnet V, Deas O, et al. Activation of IFN/STAT1 signalling predicts response to chemotherapy in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:177–87. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Critchley-Thorne RJ, Simons DL, Yan N, Miyahira AK, Dirbas FM, Johnson DL, et al. Impaired interferon signaling is a common immune defect in human cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9010–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901329106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Agarwal C, Hembree JR, Rorke EA, Eckert RL. Interferon and retinoic acid suppress the growth of human papillomavirus type 16 immortalized cervical epithelial cells, but only interferon suppresses the level of the human papillomavirus transforming oncogenes. Cancer Res. 1994;54:2108–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lippman SM, Kavanagh JJ, Paredes-Espinoza M, Delgadillo-Madrueno F, Paredes-Casillas P, Hong WK, et al. 13-cis-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha 2a in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:499–500. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.6.499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hallum AV, 3rd, Alberts DS, Lippman SM, Inclan L, Shamdas GJ, Childers JM, et al. Phase II study of 13-cis-retinoic acid plus interferon-alpha 2a in heavily pretreated squamous carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 1995;56:382–6. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1995.1067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vlock DR, Andersen J, Kalish LA, Johnson JT, Kirkwood JM, Whiteside T, et al. Phase II trial of interferon-alpha in locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: immunological and clinical correlates. J Immunother Emphasis Tumor Immunol. 1996;19:433–42. doi: 10.1097/00002371-199611000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Murad AM, Oliveira M, Saldanha TM. Phase II trial of isotretinoin and interferon alpha-2a in the treatment of advanced recurrent cervical carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994;4:414–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.1994.04060414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hong WK, Lippman SM, Itri LM, Karp DD, Lee JS, Byers RM, et al. Prevention of second primary tumors with isotretinoin in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:795–801. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199009203231205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Castaigne S, Chomienne C, Daniel MT, Ballerini P, Berger R, Fenaux P, et al. All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results. Blood. 1990;76:1704–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kalvakolanu DV. The GRIMs: a new interface between cell death regulation and interferon/retinoid induced growth suppression. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15:169–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nallar SC, Kalakonda S, Sun P, Kalvakolanu DV. GRIM-19: A Double-edged Sword that Regulates Anti-Tumor and Innate Immune Responses. Transl Oncogenomics. 2008;3:67–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deiss LP, Kimchi A. A genetic tool used to identify thioredoxin as a mediator of a growth inhibitory signal. Science. 1991;252:117–20. doi: 10.1126/science.1901424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Hirt B. Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. J Mol Biol. 1967;26:365–9. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(67)90307-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hofmann ER, Boyanapalli M, Lindner DJ, Weihua X, Hassel BA, Jagus R, et al. Thioredoxin reductase mediates cell death effects of the combination of beta interferon and retinoic acid. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:6493–504. doi: 10.1128/mcb.18.11.6493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hofmann ER, Nallar SC, Lin L, D’Cunha J, Lindner DJ, Weihua X, et al. Identification and characterization of GRIM-1, a cell-death-associated gene product. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:2781–91. doi: 10.1242/jcs.070250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 29.Chidambaram NV, Angell JE, Ling W, Hofmann ER, Kalvakolanu DV. Chromosomal localization of human GRIM-19, a novel IFN-beta and retinoic acid-activated regulator of cell death. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2000;20:661–5. doi: 10.1089/107999000414844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fearnley IM, Carroll J, Shannon RJ, Runswick MJ, Walker JE, Hirst J. GRIM-19, a cell death regulatory gene product, is a subunit of bovine mitochondrial NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (complex I) J Biol Chem. 2001;276:38345–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C100444200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kalvakolanu DV, Nallar SC, Kalakonda S. Cytokine-induced tumor suppressors: a GRIM story. Cytokine. 2010;52:128–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2010.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lufei C, Ma J, Huang G, Zhang T, Novotny-Diermayr V, Ong CT, et al. GRIM-19, a death-regulatory gene product, suppresses Stat3 activity via functional interaction. EMBO J. 2003;22:1325–35. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang J, Yang J, Roy SK, Tininini S, Hu J, Bromberg JF, et al. The cell death regulator GRIM-19 is an inhibitor of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:9342–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1633516100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang X, Huang Q, Yang Z, Li Y, Li CY. GW112, a novel antiapoptotic protein that promotes tumor growth. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2474–81. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ma X, Kalakonda S, Srinivasula SM, Reddy SP, Platanias LC, Kalvakolanu DV. GRIM-19 associates with the serine protease HtrA2 for promoting cell death. Oncogene. 2007;26:4842–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Barnich N, Hisamatsu T, Aguirre JE, Xavier R, Reinecker HC, Podolsky DK. GRIM-19 interacts with nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 and serves as downstream effector of anti-bacterial function in intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:19021–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413776200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun P, Nallar SC, Raha A, Kalakonda S, Velalar CN, Reddy SP, et al. GRIM-19 and p16(INK4a) synergistically regulate cell cycle progression and E2F1-responsive gene expression. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:27545–52. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.105767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stark GR, Darnell JE., Jr The JAK-STAT pathway at twenty. Immunity. 2012;36:503–14. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.03.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Silva CM. Role of STATs as downstream signal transducers in Src family kinase-mediated tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2004;23:8017–23. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Takeda K, Noguchi K, Shi W, Tanaka T, Matsumoto M, Yoshida N, et al. Targeted disruption of the mouse Stat3 gene leads to early embryonic lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:3801–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.8.3801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takeda K, Kaisho T, Yoshida N, Takeda J, Kishimoto T, Akira S. Stat3 activation is responsible for IL-6-dependent T cell proliferation through preventing apoptosis: generation and characterization of T cell-specific Stat3-deficient mice. J Immunol. 1998;161:4652–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Alonzi T, Maritano D, Gorgoni B, Rizzuto G, Libert C, Poli V. Essential role of STAT3 in the control of the acute-phase response as revealed by inducible gene inactivation [correction of activation] in the liver. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:1621–32. doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.5.1621-1632.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yu H, Lee H, Herrmann A, Buettner R, Jove R. Revisiting STAT3 signalling in cancer: new and unexpected biological functions. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14:736–46. doi: 10.1038/nrc3818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shen Y, Schlessinger K, Zhu X, Meffre E, Quimby F, Levy DE, et al. Essential role of STAT3 in postnatal survival and growth revealed by mice lacking STAT3 serine 727 phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:407–19. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.1.407-419.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wen Z, Zhong Z, Darnell JE., Jr Maximal activation of transcription by Stat1 and Stat3 requires both tyrosine and serine phosphorylation. Cell. 1995;82:241–50. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90311-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Nallar SC, Kalakonda S, Lindner DJ, Lorenz RR, Lamarre E, Weihua X, et al. Tumor-derived mutations in the gene associated with retinoid interferon-induced mortality (GRIM-19) disrupt its anti-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) activity and promote oncogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:7930–41. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.440610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Chao DT, Korsmeyer SJ. BCL-2 family: regulators of cell death. Ann Rev Immunol. 1998;16:395–419. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Huang DC, Strasser A. BH3-Only proteins-essential initiators of apoptotic cell death. Cell. 2000;103:839–42. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00187-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bolesta E, Pfannenstiel LW, Demelash A, Lesniewski ML, Tobin M, Schlanger SE, et al. Inhibition of Mcl-1 promotes senescence in cancer cells: implications for preventing tumor growth and chemotherapy resistance. Mol Cell Biol. 2012;32:1879–92. doi: 10.1128/MCB.06214-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ng DC, Lin BH, Lim CP, Huang G, Zhang T, Poli V, et al. Stat3 regulates microtubules by antagonizing the depolymerization activity of stathmin. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:245–57. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200503021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Janke C. The tubulin code: molecular components, readout mechanisms, and functions. J Cell Biol. 2014;206:461–72. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201406055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Paturle-Lafanechere L, Edde B, Denoulet P, Van Dorsselaer A, Mazarguil H, Le Caer JP, et al. Characterization of a major brain tubulin variant which cannot be tyrosinated. Biochemistry. 1991;30:10523–8. doi: 10.1021/bi00107a022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Matrone MA, Whipple RA, Thompson K, Cho EH, Vitolo MI, Balzer EM, et al. Metastatic breast tumors express increased tau, which promotes microtentacle formation and the reattachment of detached breast tumor cells. Oncogene. 2010;29:3217–27. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Sun P, Nallar SC, Kalakonda S, Lindner DJ, Martin SS, Kalvakolanu DV. GRIM-19 inhibits v-Src-induced cell motility by interfering with cytoskeletal restructuring. Oncogene. 2009;28:1339–47. doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sabe H, Hata A, Okada M, Nakagawa H, Hanafusa H. Analysis of the binding of the Src homology 2 domain of Csk to tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in the suppression and mitotic activation of c-Src. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:3984–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.9.3984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Superti-Furga G, Fumagalli S, Koegl M, Courtneidge SA, Draetta G. Csk inhibition of c-Src activity requires both the SH2 and SH3 domains of Src. EMBO J. 1993;12:2625–34. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1993.tb05923.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Jiang LQ, Feng X, Zhou W, Knyazev PG, Ullrich A, Chen Z. Csk-binding protein (Cbp) negatively regulates epidermal growth factor-induced cell transformation by controlling Src activation. Oncogene. 2006;25:5495–506. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Oneyama C, Hikita T, Enya K, Dobenecker MW, Saito K, Nada S, et al. The lipid raft-anchored adaptor protein Cbp controls the oncogenic potential of c-Src. Mol Cell. 2008;30:426–36. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Oneyama C, Hikita T, Nada S, Okada M. Functional dissection of transformation by c-Src and v-Src. Genes Cells. 2008;13:1–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2007.01145.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Kalakonda S, Nallar SC, Lindner DJ, Sun P, Lorenz RR, Lamarre E, et al. GRIM-19 mutations fail to inhibit v-Src-induced oncogenesis. Oncogene. 2014;33:3195–204. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Silke J, Vaux DL. IAP gene deletion and conditional knockout models. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;39:97–105. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Verhagen AM, Silke J, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Kaufmann H, Connolly LM, et al. HtrA2 promotes cell death through its serine protease activity and its ability to antagonize inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:445–54. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109891200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Palmisano G, Sardanelli AM, Signorile A, Papa S, Larsen MR. The phosphorylation pattern of bovine heart complex I subunits. Proteomics. 2007;7:1575–83. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200600801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kalakonda S, Nallar SC, Lindner DJ, Hu J, Reddy SP, Kalvakolanu DV. Tumor-suppressive activity of the cell death activator GRIM-19 on a constitutively active signal transducer and activator of transcription 3. Cancer Res. 2007;67:6212–20. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bulteau AL, Bayot A. Mitochondrial proteases and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1807:595–601. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Strauss KM, Martins LM, Plun-Favreau H, Marx FP, Kautzmann S, Berg D, et al. Loss of function mutations in the gene encoding Omi/HtrA2 in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14:2099–111. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Altieri DC. Survivin - The inconvenient IAP. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;39:91–6. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Uren AG, Wong L, Pakusch M, Fowler KJ, Burrows FJ, Vaux DL, et al. Survivin and the inner centromere protein INCENP show similar cell-cycle localization and gene knockout phenotype. Curr Biol. 2000;10:1319–28. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00769-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Huang G, Lu H, Hao A, Ng DC, Ponniah S, Guo K, et al. GRIM-19, a cell death regulatory protein, is essential for assembly and function of mitochondrial complex I. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:8447–56. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.19.8447-8456.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hoffman WH, Biade S, Zilfou JT, Chen J, Murphy M. Transcriptional repression of the anti-apoptotic survivin gene by wild type p53. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:3247–57. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106643200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Mirza A, McGuirk M, Hockenberry TN, Wu Q, Ashar H, Black S, et al. Human survivin is negatively regulated by wild-type p53 and participates in p53-dependent apoptotic pathway. Oncogene. 2002;21:2613–22. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhou Y, Li M, Wei Y, Feng D, Peng C, Weng H, et al. Down-regulation of GRIM-19 expression is associated with hyperactivation of STAT3-induced gene expression and tumor growth in human cervical cancers. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009;29:695–703. doi: 10.1089/jir.2009.0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rivadeneira DB, Caino MC, Seo JH, Angelin A, Wallace DC, Languino LR, et al. Survivin promotes oxidative phosphorylation, subcellular mitochondrial repositioning, and tumor cell invasion. Sci Signal. 2015;8:ra80. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aab1624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wegrzyn J, Potla R, Chwae YJ, Sepuri NB, Zhang Q, Koeck T, et al. Function of mitochondrial Stat3 in cellular respiration. Science. 2009;323:793–7. doi: 10.1126/science.1164551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wang H, Holloway MP, Ma L, Cooper ZA, Riolo M, Samkari A, et al. Acetylation directs survivin nuclear localization to repress STAT3 oncogenic activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:36129–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.152777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nobori T, Miura K, Wu DJ, Lois A, Takabayashi K, Carson DA. Deletions of the cyclin-dependent kinase-4 inhibitor gene in multiple human cancers. Nature. 1994;368:753–6. doi: 10.1038/368753a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ruas M, Peters G. The p16INK4a/CDKN2A tumor suppressor and its relatives. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1378:F115–77. doi: 10.1016/s0304-419x(98)00017-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Kobayashi D, Koshida S, Moriai R, Tsuji N, Watanabe N. Olfactomedin 4 promotes S-phase transition in proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:334–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2007.00397.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu W, Yan M, Liu Y, Wang R, Li C, Deng C, et al. Olfactomedin 4 down-regulates innate immunity against Helicobacter pylori infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:11056–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1001269107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Huang Y, Yang M, Yang H, Zeng Z. Upregulation of the GRIM-19 gene suppresses invasion and metastasis of human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cell line. Exp Cell Res. 2010;316:2061–70. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Park KS, Kim KK, Piao ZH, Kim MK, Lee HJ, Kim YC, et al. Olfactomedin 4 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of mouse melanoma cells through downregulation of integrin and MMP genes. Mol Cells. 2012;34:555–61. doi: 10.1007/s10059-012-0251-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Li H, Rodriguez-Canales J, Liu W, Zhu J, Hanson JC, Pack S, et al. Deletion of the olfactomedin 4 gene is associated with progression of human prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. 2013;183:1329–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Liu W, Yan M, Liu Y, McLeish KR, Coleman WG, Jr, Rodgers GP. Olfactomedin 4 inhibits cathepsin C-mediated protease activities, thereby modulating neutrophil killing of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli in mice. J Immunol. 2012;189:2460–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1103179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Liu W, Yan M, Sugui JA, Li H, Xu C, Joo J, et al. Olfm4 deletion enhances defense against Staphylococcus aureus in chronic granulomatous disease. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:3751–5. doi: 10.1172/JCI68453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Roach JC, Glusman G, Rowen L, Kaur A, Purcell MK, Smith KD, et al. The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:9577–82. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502272102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Geijtenbeek TB, Gringhuis SI. Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:465–79. doi: 10.1038/nri2569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Franchi L, Warner N, Viani K, Nunez G. Function of Nod-like receptors in microbial recognition and host defense. Immunol Rev. 2009;227:106–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00734.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Yoneyama M, Kikuchi M, Matsumoto K, Imaizumi T, Miyagishi M, Taira K, et al. Shared and unique functions of the DExD/H-box helicases RIG-I, MDA5, and LGP2 in antiviral innate immunity. J Immunol. 2005;175:2851–8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.2851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kufer TA, Banks DJ, Philpott DJ. Innate immune sensing of microbes by Nod proteins. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1072:19–27. doi: 10.1196/annals.1326.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Begum NA, Ishii K, Kurita-Taniguchi M, Tanabe M, Kobayashi M, Moriwaki Y, et al. Mycobacterium bovis BCG cell wall-specific differentially expressed genes identified by differential display and cDNA subtraction in human macrophages. Infect Immun. 2004;72:937–48. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.2.937-948.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Zhou Q, Amar S. Identification of proteins differentially expressed in human monocytes exposed to Porphyromonas gingivalis and its purified components by high-throughput immunoblotting. Infect Immun. 2006;74:1204–14. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.2.1204-1214.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Chen Y, Lu H, Liu Q, Huang G, Lim CP, Zhang L, et al. Function of GRIM-19, a mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I protein, in innate immunity. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:27227–35. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.340315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Bartholomay LC, Cho WL, Rocheleau TA, Boyle JP, Beck ET, Fuchs JF, et al. Description of the transcriptomes of immune response-activated hemocytes from the mosquito vectors Aedes aegypti and Armigeres subalbatus. Infect Immun. 2004;72:4114–26. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.7.4114-4126.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhang L, Gao L, Li Y, Lin G, Shao Y, Ji K, et al. Effects of plasmid-based Stat3-specific short hairpin RNA and GRIM-19 on PC-3M tumor cell growth. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:559–68. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wen LJ, Gao LF, Jin CS, Zhang HJ, Ji K, Yang JP, et al. Small interfering RNA survivin and GRIM-19 co-expression salmonella plasmid inhibited the growth of laryngeal cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013;6:2071–81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Russo JJ, Bohenzky RA, Chien MC, Chen J, Yan M, Maddalena D, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (HHV8) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14862–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Seo T, Lee D, Shim YS, Angell JE, Chidambaram NV, Kalvakolanu DV, et al. Viral interferon regulatory factor 1 of Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus interacts with a cell death regulator, GRIM19, and inhibits interferon/retinoic acid-induced cell death. J Virol. 2002;76:8797–807. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.17.8797-8807.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Yeo WM, Isegawa Y, Chow VT. The U95 protein of human herpesvirus 6B interacts with human GRIM-19: silencing of U95 expression reduces viral load and abrogates loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. J Virol. 2008;82:1011–20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01156-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhou Y, Wei Y, Zhu J, Wang Q, Bao L, Ma Y, et al. GRIM-19 disrupts E6/E6AP complex to rescue p53 and induce apoptosis in cervical cancers. PLoS One. 2011;6:e22065. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Munger K, Howley PM. Human papillomavirus immortalization and transformation functions. Virus Res. 2002;89:213–28. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1702(02)00190-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Liu X, Yuan H, Fu B, Disbrow GL, Apolinario T, Tomaic V, et al. The E6AP ubiquitin ligase is required for transactivation of the hTERT promoter by the human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:10807–16. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410343200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhou Y, Xu F, Tao F, Feng D, Ling B, Qian L, et al. GRIM-19 Restores Cervical Cancer Cell Senescence by Repressing hTERT Transcription. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2016;36:506–15. doi: 10.1089/jir.2015.0125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Reeves MB, Davies AA, McSharry BP, Wilkinson GW, Sinclair JH. Complex I binding by a virally encoded RNA regulates mitochondria-induced cell death. Science. 2007;316:1345–8. doi: 10.1126/science.1142984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Guerra S, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Pascual-Montano A, Munoz M, Harshman K, Esteban M. Cellular gene expression survey of vaccinia virus infection of human HeLa cells. J Virol. 2003;77:6493–506. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.11.6493-6506.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Sazanov LA. A giant molecular proton pump: structure and mechanism of respiratory complex I. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2015;16:375–88. doi: 10.1038/nrm3997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kruse SE, Watt WC, Marcinek DJ, Kapur RP, Schenkman KA, Palmiter RD. Mice with mitochondrial complex I deficiency develop a fatal encephalomyopathy. Cell Metab. 2008;7:312–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Brown D, Yu BD, Joza N, Benit P, Meneses J, Firpo M, et al. Loss of Aif function causes cell death in the mouse embryo, but the temporal progression of patterning is normal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:9918–23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0603950103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Feng D, Witkowski A, Smith S. Down-regulation of mitochondrial acyl carrier protein in mammalian cells compromises protein lipoylation and respiratory complex I and results in cell death. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:11436–45. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806991200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Saada A, Vogel RO, Hoefs SJ, van den Brand MA, Wessels HJ, Willems PH, et al. Mutations in NDUFAF3 (C3ORF60), encoding an NDUFAF4 (C6ORF66)-interacting complex I assembly protein, cause fatal neonatal mitochondrial disease. Am J Hum Genet. 2009;84:718–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Schlehe JS, Journel MS, Taylor KP, Amodeo KD, LaVoie MJ. The mitochondrial disease associated protein Ndufaf2 is dispensable for Complex-1 assembly but critical for the regulation of oxidative stress. Neurobiol Dis. 2013;58:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2013.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Cossard R, Esposito M, Sellem CH, Pitayu L, Vasnier C, Delahodde A, et al. Caenorhabditis elegans expressing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae NADH alternative dehydrogenase Ndi1p, as a tool to identify new genes involved in complex I related diseases. Front Genet. 2015;6:206. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2015.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Perry CN, Huang C, Liu W, Magee N, Carreira RS, Gottlieb RA. Xenotransplantation of mitochondrial electron transfer enzyme, Ndi1, in myocardial reperfusion injury. PLoS One. 2011;6:e16288. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Mehrabian Z, Chandrasekaran K, Kalakonda S, Kristian T, Fiskum G, Kalvakolanu DV. The IFN-beta and retinoic acid-induced cell death regulator GRIM-19 is upregulated during focal cerebral ischemia. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2007;27:383–92. doi: 10.1089/jir.2006.0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Vinothkumar KR, Zhu J, Hirst J. Architecture of mammalian respiratory complex I. Nature. 2014;515:80–4. doi: 10.1038/nature13686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Vogel RO, Dieteren CE, van den Heuvel LP, Willems PH, Smeitink JA, Koopman WJ, et al. Identification of mitochondrial complex I assembly intermediates by tracing tagged NDUFS3 demonstrates the entry point of mitochondrial subunits. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:7582–90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609410200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Huang G, Chen Y, Lu H, Cao X. Coupling mitochondrial respiratory chain to cell death: an essential role of mitochondrial complex I in the interferon-beta and retinoic acid-induced cancer cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:327–37. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Chen Y, Yuen WH, Fu J, Huang G, Melendez AJ, Ibrahim FB, et al. The mitochondrial respiratory chain controls intracellular calcium signaling and NFAT activity essential for heart formation in Xenopus laevis. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:6420–32. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01946-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kalakonda S, Nallar SC, Jaber S, Keay SK, Rorke E, Munivenkatappa R, et al. Monoallelic loss of tumor suppressor GRIM-19 promotes tumorigenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:E4213–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1303760110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Angebault C, Charif M, Guegen N, Piro-Megy C, Mousson de Camaret B, Procaccio V, et al. Mutation in NDUFA13/GRIM19 leads to early onset hypotonia, dyskinesia and sensorial deficiencies, and mitochondrial complex I instability. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:3948–55. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddv133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Alchanati I, Nallar SC, Sun P, Gao L, Hu J, Stein A, et al. A proteomic analysis reveals the loss of expression of the cell death regulatory gene GRIM-19 in human renal cell carcinomas. Oncogene. 2006;25:7138–47. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhou T, Chao L, Rong G, Wang C, Ma R, Wang X. Down-regulation of GRIM-19 is associated with STAT3 overexpression in breast carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1773–9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2012.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Maximo V, Botelho T, Capela J, Soares P, Lima J, Taveira A, et al. Somatic and germline mutation in GRIM-19, a dual function gene involved in mitochondrial metabolism and cell death, is linked to mitochondrion-rich (Hurthle cell) tumours of the thyroid. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:1892–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Nallar SC, Kalakonda S, Sun P, Ohmori Y, Hiroi M, Mori K, et al. Identification of a structural motif in the tumor-suppressive protein GRIM-19 required for its antitumor activity. Am J Pathol. 2010;177:896–907. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Bayley JP, Launonen V, Tomlinson IP. The FH mutation database: an online database of fumarate hydratase mutations involved in the MCUL (HLRCC) tumor syndrome and congenital fumarase deficiency. BMC Med Genet. 2008;9:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2350-9-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Niemann S, Muller U, Engelhardt D, Lohse P. Autosomal dominant malignant and catecholamine-producing paraganglioma caused by a splice donor site mutation in SDHC. Hum Genet. 2003;113:92–4. doi: 10.1007/s00439-003-0938-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, Lawrence EC, Myssiorek D, Bosch A, et al. Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science. 2000;287:848–51. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kondo K, Kaelin WG., Jr The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene. Exp Cell Res. 2001;264:117–25. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.5139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bertout JA, Patel SA, Simon MC. The impact of O2 availability on human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:967–75. doi: 10.1038/nrc2540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Semenza GL, Roth PH, Fang HM, Wang GL. Transcriptional regulation of genes encoding glycolytic enzymes by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:23757–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Semenza GL, Jiang BH, Leung SW, Passantino R, Concordet JP, Maire P, et al. Hypoxia response elements in the aldolase A, enolase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase A gene promoters contain essential binding sites for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:32529–37. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.51.32529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Fukuda R, Zhang H, Kim JW, Shimoda L, Dang CV, Semenza GL. HIF-1 regulates cytochrome oxidase subunits to optimize efficiency of respiration in hypoxic cells. Cell. 2007;129:111–22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Bota DA, Davies KJ. Lon protease preferentially degrades oxidized mitochondrial aconitase by an ATP-stimulated mechanism. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:674–80. doi: 10.1038/ncb836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Semenza GL. HIF-1: using two hands to flip the angiogenic switch. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2000;19:59–65. doi: 10.1023/a:1026544214667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Sun B, Zhang D, Zhang S, Zhang W, Guo H, Zhao X. Hypoxia influences vasculogenic mimicry channel formation and tumor invasion-related protein expression in melanoma. Cancer Lett. 2007;249:188–97. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2006.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Vandooren J, Van den Steen PE, Opdenakker G. Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9): the next decade. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2013;48:222–72. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2013.770819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Mariani SM, Matiba B, Baumler C, Krammer PH. Regulation of cell surface APO-1/Fas (CD95) ligand expression by metalloproteases. Eur J Immunol. 1995;25:2303–7. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830250828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Peter ME, Hadji A, Murmann AE, Brockway S, Putzbach W, Pattanayak A, et al. The role of CD95 and CD95 ligand in cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:549–59. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2015.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Yokoyama Y, Grunebach F, Schmidt SM, Heine A, Hantschel M, Stevanovic S, et al. Matrilysin (MMP-7) is a novel broadly expressed tumor antigen recognized by antigen-specific T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5503–11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Henley SA, Dick FA. The retinoblastoma family of proteins and their regulatory functions in the mammalian cell division cycle. Cell Div. 2012;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-7-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Goodrich DW, Wang NP, Qian YW, Lee EY, Lee WH. The retinoblastoma gene product regulates progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Cell. 1991;67:293–302. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90181-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Lim S, Kaldis P. Cdks, cyclins and CKIs: roles beyond cell cycle regulation. Development. 2013;140:3079–93. doi: 10.1242/dev.091744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Malumbres M, Barbacid M. To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:222–31. doi: 10.1038/35106065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Zachary I, Rozengurt E. Focal adhesion kinase (p125FAK): a point of convergence in the action of neuropeptides, integrins, and oncogenes. Cell. 1992;71:891–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90385-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Hsia DA, Mitra SK, Hauck CR, Streblow DN, Nelson JA, Ilic D, et al. Differential regulation of cell motility and invasion by FAK. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:753–67. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200212114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Ilic D, Furuta Y, Kanazawa S, Takeda N, Sobue K, Nakatsuji N, et al. Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice. Nature. 1995;377:539–44. doi: 10.1038/377539a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Goley ED, Welch MD. The ARP2/3 complex: an actin nucleator comes of age. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:713–26. doi: 10.1038/nrm2026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Thiery JP, Acloque H, Huang RY, Nieto MA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009;139:871–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Frisch SM, Screaton RA. Anoikis mechanisms. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2001;13:555–62. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00251-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Chan KT, Cortesio CL, Huttenlocher A. FAK alters invadopodia and focal adhesion composition and dynamics to regulate breast cancer invasion. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:357–70. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200809110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Kim JK, Diehl JA. Nuclear cyclin D1: an oncogenic driver in human cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2009;220:292–6. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Faunes F, Hayward P, Descalzo SM, Chatterjee SS, Balayo T, Trott J, et al. A membrane-associated beta-catenin/Oct4 complex correlates with ground-state pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Development. 2013;140:1171–83. doi: 10.1242/dev.085654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Forbes NS. Engineering the perfect (bacterial) cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:785–94. doi: 10.1038/nrc2934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Liu YB, Zhang L, Guo YX, Gao LF, Liu XC, Zhao LJ, et al. Plasmid-based Survivin shRNA and GRIM-19 carried by attenuated Salmonella suppresses tumor cell growth. Asian J Androl. 2012;14:536–45. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Moon YM, Lee J, Lee SY, Her YM, Ryu JG, Kim EK, et al. Gene associated with retinoid-interferon-induced mortality 19 attenuates murine autoimmune arthritis by regulation of th17 and treg cells. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014;66:569–78. doi: 10.1002/art.38267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Gough DJ, Corlett A, Schlessinger K, Wegrzyn J, Larner AC, Levy DE. Mitochondrial STAT3 supports Ras-dependent oncogenic transformation. Science. 2009;324:1713–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1171721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Potla R, Koeck T, Wegrzyn J, Cherukuri S, Shimoda K, Baker DP, et al. Tyk2 tyrosine kinase expression is required for the maintenance of mitochondrial respiration in primary pro-B lymphocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:8562–71. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00497-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Phillips D, Reilley MJ, Aponte AM, Wang G, Boja E, Gucek M, et al. Stoichiometry of STAT3 and mitochondrial proteins: Implications for the regulation of oxidative phosphorylation by protein-protein interactions. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:23532–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C110.152652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Baeriswyl V, Christofori G. The angiogenic switch in carcinogenesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2009;19:329–37. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Bergers G, Benjamin LE. Tumorigenesis and the angiogenic switch. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:401–10. doi: 10.1038/nrc1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Aguirre-Ghiso JA. Models, mechanisms and clinical evidence for cancer dormancy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:834–46. doi: 10.1038/nrc2256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Yeh AC, Ramaswamy S. Mechanisms of Cancer Cell Dormancy-Another Hallmark of Cancer? Cancer Res. 2015 doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 164.Dey-Guha I, Wolfer A, Yeh AC, JGA, Darp R, Leon E, et al. Asymmetric cancer cell division regulated by AKT. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:12845–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109632108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Warburg O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science. 1956;123:309–14. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Warburg O. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science. 1956;124:269–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science. 2009;324:1029–33. doi: 10.1126/science.1160809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Wilson JE. Isozymes of mammalian hexokinase: structure, subcellular localization and metabolic function. J Exp Biol. 2003;206:2049–57. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00241. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Roberts DJ, Miyamoto S. Hexokinase II integrates energy metabolism and cellular protection: Akting on mitochondria and TORCing to autophagy. Cell Death Differ. 2015;22:248–57. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Haga A, Niinaka Y, Raz A. Phosphohexose isomerase/autocrine motility factor/neuroleukin/maturation factor is a multifunctional phosphoprotein. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1480:235–44. doi: 10.1016/s0167-4838(00)00075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Ros S, Schulze A. Balancing glycolytic flux: the role of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose 2,6-bisphosphatases in cancer metabolism. Cancer Metab. 2013;1:8. doi: 10.1186/2049-3002-1-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Dunaway GA, Kasten TP, Sebo T, Trapp R. Analysis of the phosphofructokinase subunits and isoenzymes in human tissues. Biochem J. 1988;251:677–83. doi: 10.1042/bj2510677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Rider MH, Bertrand L, Vertommen D, Michels PA, Rousseau GG, Hue L. 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase: head-to-head with a bifunctional enzyme that controls glycolysis. Biochem J. 2004;381:561–79. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Perham RN. The fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolases: same reaction, different enzymes. Biochem Soc Trans. 1990;18:185–7. doi: 10.1042/bst0180185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Du S, Guan Z, Hao L, Song Y, Wang L, Gong L, et al. Fructose-bisphosphate aldolase a is a potential metastasis-associated marker of lung squamous cell carcinoma and promotes lung cell tumorigenesis and migration. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Harris TK, Cole RN, Comer FI, Mildvan AS. Proton transfer in the mechanism of triosephosphate isomerase. Biochemistry. 1998;37:16828–38. doi: 10.1021/bi982089f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Tristan C, Shahani N, Sedlak TW, Sawa A. The diverse functions of GAPDH: views from different subcellular compartments. Cell Signal. 2011;23:317–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Beutler E. PGK deficiency. Br J Haematol. 2007;136:3–11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06351.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Omenn GS, Cheung SC. Phosphoglycerate mutase isozyme marker for tissue differentiation in man. Am J Hum Genet. 1974;26:393–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Pancholi V. Multifunctional alpha-enolase: its role in diseases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2001;58:902–20. doi: 10.1007/PL00000910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Oliva D, Cali L, Feo S, Giallongo A. Complete structure of the human gene encoding neuron-specific enolase. Genomics. 1991;10:157–65. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(91)90496-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Peshavaria M, Day IN. Molecular structure of the human muscle-specific enolase gene (ENO3) Biochem J. 1991;275( Pt 2):427–33. doi: 10.1042/bj2750427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Israelsen WJ, Vander Heiden MG. Pyruvate kinase: Function, regulation and role in cancer. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;43:43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Noguchi T, Yamada K, Inoue H, Matsuda T, Tanaka T. The L- and R-type isozymes of rat pyruvate kinase are produced from a single gene by use of different promoters. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:14366–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Noguchi T, Inoue H, Tanaka T. The M1- and M2-type isozymes of rat pyruvate kinase are produced from the same gene by alternative RNA splicing. J Biol Chem. 1986;261:13807–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Mazurek S, Boschek CB, Hugo F, Eigenbrodt E. Pyruvate kinase type M2 and its role in tumor growth and spreading. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15:300–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Christofk HR, Vander Heiden MG, Harris MH, Ramanathan A, Gerszten RE, Wei R, et al. The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth. Nature. 2008;452:230–3. doi: 10.1038/nature06734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Gao X, Wang H, Yang JJ, Liu X, Liu ZR. Pyruvate kinase M2 regulates gene transcription by acting as a protein kinase. Mol Cell. 2012;45:598–609. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Keller KE, Doctor ZM, Dwyer ZW, Lee YS. SAICAR induces protein kinase activity of PKM2 that is necessary for sustained proliferative signaling of cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2014;53:700–9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Yang P, Li Z, Fu R, Wu H, Li Z. Pyruvate kinase M2 facilitates colon cancer cell migration via the modulation of STAT3 signalling. Cell Signal. 2014;26:1853–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Yang W, Xia Y, Hawke D, Li X, Liang J, Xing D, et al. PKM2 phosphorylates histone H3 and promotes gene transcription and tumorigenesis. Cell. 2012;150:685–96. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Yang W, Xia Y, Ji H, Zheng Y, Liang J, Huang W, et al. Nuclear PKM2 regulates beta-catenin transactivation upon EGFR activation. Nature. 2011;480:118–22. doi: 10.1038/nature10598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Keller KE, Tan IS, Lee YS. SAICAR stimulates pyruvate kinase isoform M2 and promotes cancer cell survival in glucose-limited conditions. Science. 2012;338:1069–72. doi: 10.1126/science.1224409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Wang HJ, Hsieh YJ, Cheng WC, Lin CP, Lin YS, Yang SF, et al. JMJD5 regulates PKM2 nuclear translocation and reprograms HIF-1alpha-mediated glucose metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:279–84. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311249111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Lincet H, Icard P. How do glycolytic enzymes favour cancer cell proliferation by nonmetabolic functions? Oncogene. 2015;34:3751–9. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Li SS, Luedemann M, Sharief FS, Takano T, Deaven LL. Mapping of human lactate dehydrogenase-A, -B, and -C genes and their related sequences: the gene for LDHC is located with that for LDHA on chromosome 11. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1988;48:16–8. doi: 10.1159/000132578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Summermatter S, Santos G, Perez-Schindler J, Handschin C. Skeletal muscle PGC-1alpha controls whole-body lactate homeostasis through estrogen-related receptor alpha-dependent activation of LDH B and repression of LDH A. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:8738–43. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212976110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Gallo M, Sapio L, Spina A, Naviglio D, Calogero A, Naviglio S. Lactic dehydrogenase and cancer: an overview. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2015;20:1234–49. doi: 10.2741/4368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Ciszak EM, Korotchkina LG, Dominiak PM, Sidhu S, Patel MS. Structural basis for flip-flop action of thiamin pyrophosphate-dependent enzymes revealed by human pyruvate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:21240–6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M300339200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Holness MJ, Sugden MC. Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex activity by reversible phosphorylation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003;31:1143–51. doi: 10.1042/bst0311143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Huang B, Gudi R, Wu P, Harris RA, Hamilton J, Popov KM. Isoenzymes of pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase. DNA-derived amino acid sequences, expression, and regulation. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:17680–8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.28.17680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Kaplon J, Zheng L, Meissl K, Chaneton B, Selivanov VA, Mackay G, et al. A key role for mitochondrial gatekeeper pyruvate dehydrogenase in oncogene-induced senescence. Nature. 2013;498:109–12. doi: 10.1038/nature12154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Webb BA, Chimenti M, Jacobson MP, Barber DL. Dysregulated pH: a perfect storm for cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:671–7. doi: 10.1038/nrc3110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Thews O, Gassner B, Kelleher DK, Schwerdt G, Gekle M. Impact of extracellular acidity on the activity of P-glycoprotein and the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Neoplasia. 2006;8:143–52. doi: 10.1593/neo.05697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Gerweck LE, Vijayappa S, Kozin S. Tumor pH controls the in vivo efficacy of weak acid and base chemotherapeutics. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006;5:1275–9. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Fischer K, Hoffmann P, Voelkl S, Meidenbauer N, Ammer J, Edinger M, et al. Inhibitory effect of tumor cell-derived lactic acid on human T cells. Blood. 2007;109:3812–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Chang CH, Qiu J, O’Sullivan D, Buck MD, Noguchi T, Curtis JD, et al. Metabolic Competition in the Tumor Microenvironment Is a Driver of Cancer Progression. Cell. 2015;162:1229–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Pearce EL, Poffenberger MC, Chang CH, Jones RG. Fueling immunity: insights into metabolism and lymphocyte function. Science. 2013;342:1242454. doi: 10.1126/science.1242454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Okamoto T, Inozume T, Mitsui H, Kanzaki M, Harada K, Shibagaki N, et al. Overexpression of GRIM-19 in cancer cells suppresses STAT3-mediated signal transduction and cancer growth. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2333–43. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-1147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Seth RB, Sun L, Ea CK, Chen ZJ. Identification and characterization of MAVS, a mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein that activates NF-kappaB and IRF 3. Cell. 2005;122:669–82. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Rigaud S, Fondaneche MC, Lambert N, Pasquier B, Mateo V, Soulas P, et al. XIAP deficiency in humans causes an X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome. Nature. 2006;444:110–4. doi: 10.1038/nature05257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Krieg A, Correa RG, Garrison JB, Le Negrate G, Welsh K, Huang Z, et al. XIAP mediates NOD signaling via interaction with RIP2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:14524–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907131106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Damgaard RB, Nachbur U, Yabal M, Wong WW, Fiil BK, Kastirr M, et al. The ubiquitin ligase XIAP recruits LUBAC for NOD2 signaling in inflammation and innate immunity. Mol Cell. 2012;46:746–58. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Zeissig Y, Petersen BS, Milutinovic S, Bosse E, Mayr G, Peuker K, et al. XIAP variants in male Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2015;64:66–76. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Speckmann C, Lehmberg K, Albert MH, Damgaard RB, Fritsch M, Gyrd-Hansen M, et al. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) deficiency: the spectrum of presenting manifestations beyond hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Clin Immunol. 2013;149:133–41. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Estornes Y, Bertrand MJ. IAPs, regulators of innate immunity and inflammation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2015;39:106–14. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.03.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Kelly RJ, Thomas A, Rajan A, Chun G, Lopez-Chavez A, Szabo E, et al. A phase I/II study of sepantronium bromide (YM155, survivin suppressor) with paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24:2601–6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Dohi T, Beltrami E, Wall NR, Plescia J, Altieri DC. Mitochondrial survivin inhibits apoptosis and promotes tumorigenesis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1117–27. doi: 10.1172/JCI22222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.He X, Cao X. Identification of alternatively spliced GRIM-19 mRNA in kidney cancer tissues. J Hum Genet. 2010;55:507–11. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2010.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Liu YB, Shen WG, Ge H, Gai XD, Lu LL, Zhao XJ. Expressions of survivin and GRIM-19 in prostate cancer. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue = National journal of andrology. 2011;17:21–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Gong LB, Luo XL, Liu SY, Tao DD, Gong JP, Hu JB. Correlations of GRIM-19 and its target gene product STAT3 to malignancy of human colorectal carcinoma. Ai Zheng = Chinese journal of cancer. 2007;26:683–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Bu X, Zhao C, Wang W, Zhang N. GRIM-19 inhibits the STAT3 signaling pathway and sensitizes gastric cancer cells to radiation. Gene. 2013;512:198–205. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.10.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Chen H, Wu Q. Expression of GW112 and GRIM-19 in colorectal cancer tissues. J BUON. 2015;20:438–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Zhou AM, Zhao JJ, Ye J, Xiao WH, Kalvakolanu DV, Liu RY. Expression and clinical significance of GRIM-19 in non-small cell lung cancer. Ai Zheng = Chinese journal of cancer. 2009;28:431–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Wang T, Yan XB, Zhao JJ, Ye J, Jiang ZF, Wu DR, et al. Gene associated with retinoid-interferon-induced mortality-19 suppresses growth of lung adenocarcinoma tumor in vitro and in vivo. Lung Cancer. 2011;72:287–93. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Fan XY, Jiang ZF, Cai L, Liu RY. Expression and clinical significance of GRIM-19 in lung cancer. Med Oncol. 2012;29:3183–9. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0249-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Cheng Y, Zhang HY, Zhou Y, Tao F, Yu YH. Decreased expression of GRIM-19 and its association with high-risk HPV infection in cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasias and cancer. Clin Invest Med. 2014;37:E77–84. doi: 10.25011/cim.v37i2.21089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Shao YP, Cheng XD, Wan XY. Expression and clinical significance of GRIM-19 in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012;47:751–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Jin YH, Jung S, Jin SG, Jung TY, Moon KS, Kim IY. GRIM-19 Expression and Function in Human Gliomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2010;48:20–30. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2010.48.1.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Zhang Y, Hao H, Zhao S, Liu Q, Yuan Q, Ni S, et al. Downregulation of GRIM-19 promotes growth and migration of human glioma cells. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1991–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02059.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Li F, Ren W, Zhao Y, Fu Z, Ji Y, Zhu Y, et al. Downregulation of GRIM-19 is associated with hyperactivation of p-STAT3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Med Oncol. 2012;29:3046–54. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0234-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Hao H, Liu J, Liu G, Guan D, Yang Y, Zhang X, et al. Depletion of GRIM-19 accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma invasion via inducing EMT and loss of contact inhibition. J Cell Physiol. 2012;227:1212–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Kong D, Zhao L, Du Y, He P, Zou Y, Yang L, et al. Overexpression of GRIM-19, a mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I protein, suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7:7497–507. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Kjellin H, Johansson H, Hoog A, Lehtio J, Jakobsson PJ, Kjellman M. Differentially expressed proteins in malignant and benign adrenocortical tumors. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES