Skip to main content
The Journal of Immunology Author Choice logoLink to The Journal of Immunology Author Choice
. 2017 Feb 6;198(6):2352–2365. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601018

IL-10 Plays Opposing Roles during Staphylococcus aureus Systemic and Localized Infections

John M Leech *, Keenan A Lacey *, Michelle E Mulcahy *, Eva Medina , Rachel M McLoughlin *,
PMCID: PMC5337812  PMID: 28167629

Abstract

IL-10 is a potent anti-inflammatory mediator that plays a crucial role in limiting host immunopathology during bacterial infections by controlling effector T cell activation. Staphylococcus aureus has previously been shown to manipulate the IL-10 response as a mechanism of immune evasion during chronic systemic and biofilm models of infection. In the present study, we demonstrate divergent roles for IL-10 depending on the site of infection. During acute systemic S. aureus infection, IL-10 plays an important protective role and is required to prevent bacterial dissemination and host morbidity by controlling effector T cells and the associated downstream hyperactivation of inflammatory phagocytes, which are capable of host tissue damage. CD19+CD11b+CD5+ B1a regulatory cells were shown to rapidly express IL-10 in a TLR2-dependent manner in response to S. aureus, and adoptive transfer of B1a cells was protective during acute systemic infection in IL-10–deficient hosts. In contrast, during localized s.c. infection, IL-10 production plays a detrimental role by facilitating bacterial persistence via the same mechanism of controlling proinflammatory T cell responses. Our findings demonstrate that induction of IL-10 has a major influence on disease outcome during acute S. aureus infection. Too much IL-10 at one end of the scale may suppress otherwise protective T cell responses, thus facilitating persistence of the bacteria, and at the other end, too little IL-10 may tend toward fatal host-mediated pathology through excessive activation of T cells and associated phagocyte-mediated damage.

Introduction

Immune regulation plays a critical role in protecting the host from the pathology associated with bacterial infection. IL-10, which is produced by various innate and adaptive immune cells, including monocytes, macrophages, T cells, and B cells, is a prototypic immunoregulatory cytokine that is necessary for controlling/regulating the production of proinflammatory cytokines both in vitro and in vivo (14). Systemic infection with Escherichia coli (5), Toxoplasma gondii (6), Trypanosoma cruzi (7), and Plasmodium chabaudi (8) in IL-10–deficient mice resulted in excessive production of proinflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α and IFN-γ, which contributed to increased host immunopathology, morbidity, and mortality. Neutralization of TNF-α or IFN-γ in these mice attenuated organ damage and reduced mortality (5, 8).

Although immune regulation is critical for protection of the host, certain bacteria can manipulate these immunosuppressive mechanisms to facilitate persistence during infection. Phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by macrophages results in IL-10 production, which in turn has the capacity to block phagosome maturation in a STAT3-dependent manner, thereby promoting intracellular bacterial survival (9), in addition to inhibiting a Th1 response, thereby facilitating its persistence in the lung (10). Similarly, Bordetella pertussis can promote IL-10 production by both macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) through expression of the virulence factors filamentous hemagglutinin and adenylate cyclase toxin. This IL-10 then inhibits IL-12p70 production by DCs, and these DCs direct naive T cells toward a regulatory phenotype (1113). CD25Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) were expanded in B. pertussis–infected mice, and these cells work with IL-10–secreting Tregs in the lungs to subvert bacterial clearance by downregulating Th1 responses (14). Following intranasal challenge with Streptococcus pneumoniae, induction of the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β was found to promote local Treg expansion, thereby facilitating bacterial survival within the nasopharyngeal tissue. Immune regulation therefore functions as a double-edged sword, on the one hand, protecting host against potentially fatal excessive proinflammatory responses, whereas on the other hand, it can also benefit the bacterium by dampening down local proinflammatory responses, thus facilitating bacterial persistence.

Staphylococcus aureus is an important component of the normal microbiota of most of the healthy human population (15). However, upon invasive entry it is a potentially lethal opportunistic pathogen and is a leading cause of a variety of community-acquired and hospital-acquired bacterial infections. S. aureus is one of the most common causes of bacteremia, with a higher mortality than any other bacteria (16). It is also an important cause of other deep-seated infections, including osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, endocarditis, device-related infections, and pneumonia (17). This bacterium has evolved a sophisticated repertoire of immune evasion mechanisms with the capacity to modulate both innate and adaptive arms of the immune response (17, 18). S. aureus has also been shown to manipulate host immunoregulatory mechanisms to facilitate persistence during infection, and IL-10 appears to be at the forefront of this evasion strategy (19).

In a systemic model of chronic S. aureus bloodstream infection, kidney abscesses were still apparent on day 56 postinfection due to impaired T cell responses (20); subsequently, this immunosuppression was attributed to the expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and to a lesser extent Tregs in the spleens of infected mice compared with uninfected controls (21). Although both IL-10 and TGF-β were produced, immunosuppression was primarily dependent on cell–cell contact that inhibited effector T cell responses (21). Adoptive transfer of MDSCs exacerbated systemic infection in recipient mice following S. aureus i.v. challenge (21). Similarly, during a chronic S. aureus orthopedic biofilm infection, Heim et al. (22, 23) observed an expansion of IL-10–producing MDSCs at the site of infection, which was associated with bacterial persistence. Targeted depletion of these cells resulted in an enhanced proinflammatory response that resulted in increased bacterial clearance (23, 24).

It appears, therefore, that during chronic infection, S. aureus can manipulate host immune-regulatory machinery, in particular MDSCs, to facilitate its own survival. However, depending on the local microenvironment, the mechanism of immunosuppression exerted by these regulatory cells may differ. In the present study, we investigated the importance of IL-10 during acute S. aureus infection in the context of both systemic and local infection. Our data demonstrate that the induction of IL-10 has opposing effects depending on the site of infection, likely due to the distinct cellular microenvironments with which S. aureus engages at these sites. During acute systemic infection, induction of IL-10 favored the host and was required to prevent systemic immunopathology, whereas during acute local infection induction of IL-10 favored persistence of the bacterium. Furthermore, we identified B1a cells as a novel source of IL-10 that was required to prevent systemic pathology during S. aureus–induced acute systemic infection.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Age- and sex-matched wild-type (WT) C57BL/6, IL-10 GFP-reporter (IL-10 GFP) B6.129S6-Il10tm1Flv/J (25), and IL-10 knockout (IL-10−/−) mice (6–8 wk old) were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions at the Trinity College Dublin Comparative Medicines unit. TLR2 knockout (TLR2−/−) mice were originally purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and bred in-house at the Helmholtz Center for Infection Research animal facility. All experiments were conducted in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines of the Health Products Regulatory Authority, the competent authority in Ireland, and in accordance with protocols approved by Trinity College Dublin Animal Research Ethics Committee or with the German regulations of the Society for Laboratory Animal Science and the European Health Law of the Federation of Laboratory Animal Science Associations.

Bacteria

A streptomycin-resistant mutant of S. aureus strain Newman (Newman SmR) (26), S. aureus strain PS80 (27), and USA 300 LAC::lux (28) have been previously described. All bacteria were cultivated from frozen stocks for 24 h at 37°C on tryptic soy agar (TSA). Bacterial suspensions were prepared in sterile PBS and the concentrations were estimated by measuring the OD of solutions at 600 nm. CFU were verified by plating serial dilutions of each inoculum onto TSA.

S. aureus–induced acute peritonitis

Mice were infected with S. aureus via i.p. injection of 1 × 108 CFU. In all experiments, S. aureus strain Newman was used unless specifically stated otherwise. At specific time points postinfection, mice were sacrificed to assess local and systemic infection levels and associated immune responses. Peritoneal exudate cells were isolated by lavage of the peritoneal cavity with 2 ml of sterile PBS. Erythrocytes were lysed using 0.87% ammonium chloride, and cells were washed and resuspended in complete RPMI 1640 (RPMI 1640 [Biosera], 10% FCS [Biosera], 100 mM l-glutamine [Life Technologies], 100 μg/ml penicillin/streptomycin [Life Technologies]) for analysis by flow cytometry. The lavage fluid was centrifuged and supernatants were stored at −20°C for subsequent cytokine analysis. Kidneys, liver, and spleen were homogenized in 3 ml of sterile PBS. Total tissue bacterial burden was established by plating serial dilutions of peritoneal lavage or tissue homogenate on TSA. All plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and CFU were enumerated. Results are expressed as CFU per milliliter.

S. aureus–induced acute s.c. infection

Mice were shaved on the back and inoculated s.c. with S. aureus USA300 LAC::lux strain (2 × 107 CFU) in 100 μl of sterile PBS using a 27-gauge syringe (BD Biosciences). Mice were anesthetized via inhalation of isoflurane (Iso-vet). In vivo bioluminescence imaging was performed using the Biospace Lab Photon Imager system. Bioluminescent activity is presented as photons per second per steradian. Measurements of total lesion size (square centimeters) were made by analyzing digital photographs using the software program (Biospace Lab Photon Imager) and a millimeter ruler as a reference. To confirm that the in vivo bioluminescent signals reflected bacterial burden, 8-mm punch biopsies of lesional skin were taken at specific time points, homogenized in sterile PBS, and total bacterial burdens were determined by plating out serial dilutions on TSA.

For leukocyte analysis, excised tissue was collagenase digested (collagenase type IV; 300 U/ml) for 2 h at 37°C with constant rotation. A single-cell suspension was obtained by mechanical disruption of tissues on 70-μm nylon cell-strainer filters (BD Biosciences Falcon). Digested tissue was lysed to remove contaminating erythrocytes. Cells were washed with 1% BSA in PBS before flow cytometry staining.

ELISA

ELISAs for IL-1β, IL-10, IL-17, TNF-α, IL-22, CXCL1, and TGF-β (R&D DuoSet; R&D Systems) were performed on cell culture supernatants, peritoneal lavage fluid, or homogenized whole-skin tissue as per the manufacturer’s instructions.

Flow cytometry

Peritoneal exudate cells were incubated in the presence of PMA, ionomycin, and brefeldin A (Sigma-Aldrich) for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were then incubated with Fcγ block (1 mg/ml) on ice before surface staining with fluorochrome-conjugated Abs against CD3 (clone 500A2; BD Biosciences), γδ TCR (clone GL3; eBioscience), CD8 (clone 53-6.7; eBioscience), CD4 (clone RM4-5; BD Biosciences), CD11b (clone M1/70; eBioscience), Ly6G (clone IA8; BD Biosciences), F480 (clone BM8; eBioscience), CD1d (clone 1B1; BD Biosciences), CD19 (clone 1D3; eBioscience), Ly6C (clone HK1.4; eBioscience), CD45 (30-F11; eBioscience), fixable viability dye (eBioscience), CD5 (clone 53-7.3; eBioscience), CD25 (clone PC61.5; eBioscience), and Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s; eBioscience).

For intracellular cytokine staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the DakoCytomation IntraStain kit, before intracellular staining with fluorochrome-conjugated Abs against IL-17A (clone 17B7; eBioscience), NO synthase 2 (NOS2; clone CXNFT; eBioscience) and IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2; eBioscience). To investigate reactive oxygen species (ROS) activity within phagocytes, dihydrorhodamine 123 assays were performed as previously described (29). For Foxp3 staining, a Foxp3 staining kit (eBioscience) was used. Flow cytometric data were acquired with a BD FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star). Gates are set on respective fluorescence minus one.

B1a cell isolation and adoptive transfer or culture

Purified CD19+CD11b+CD5+ B1a cells were isolated from the peritoneal cavity of naive WT, IL-10−/−, and TLR2−/− mice by FACS sorting using Abs specific to CD19, CD11b, and CD5 and sorted using a Beckman Coulter [DakoCytomation] MoFlo cell sorter. The level of purity of purified B1a cells was >95%. WT B1a cells or PBS were administered by i.p. injection to naive mice (2 × 105 cells per mouse). At 12 h posttransfer, mice were challenged by i.p. injection of S. aureus Newman (1 × 108 CFU). On day 5 postinfection, the peritoneum was lavaged and the kidney, spleen, and liver were isolated to determine local and systemic bacterial burden as previously described.

In vitro culture of B1a cells

B1a cells (1 × 105) were plated in complete RPMI 1640, without penicillin/streptomycin, and then infected with S. aureus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100. Supernatants were then assessed for IL-10 by ELISA 18 h postinfection.

Determination of total IgM in the peritoneal fluid

Total IgM was determined in serial dilutions of peritoneal fluid using an IgM ELISA. Briefly, medium-binding 96-well plates were coated with purified rat anti-mouse IgM (1 μg/ml) (clone II/41; BD Pharmingen). Peritoneal lavage fluid was added. Biotinylated rat anti-mouse IgM (0.5 μg/ml) (Clone R6-60.2; BD Pharmingen) Ab was used as a secondary Ab. Color development was achieved using o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) in substrate buffer, and OD450 was measured using a microplate reader and SoftMax Pro software.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software. For murine studies, differences between groups were analyzed using an unpaired Student t test, Mann–Whitney U test, one-way ANOVA with a Tukey comparison posttest, or two-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction posttest where appropriate. A p value ≤0.05 was considered significant.

Results

IL-10 is rapidly induced both locally and systemically following acute S. aureus peritoneal infection

Using a previously described model of acute systemic infection induced by S. aureus peritoneal challenge (30), we investigated the production of IL-10 both locally and systemically. Groups of WT mice received a single i.p. injection of S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) or sterile PBS as a control. At specific time points postinfection, peritoneal fluid and sera were collected and IL-10 concentrations were quantified by ELISA. IL-10 was significantly elevated at 3 h postinfection, both locally in the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 1A) and systemically in the blood (Fig. 1B), and had returned to baseline by 24 h postinfection.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

S. aureus acute peritoneal infection induces local and systemic IL-10 production. Groups of WT mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). At specific time points postinfection the peritoneal cavity was lavaged and blood was collected to isolate sera. IL-10 concentrations in the peritoneal lavage fluid (A) and the sera (B) were measured by ELISA. IL-10 GFP reporter mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus Newman (1 × 108 CFU). At 3 h postinfection, leukocytes were isolated from the peritoneal cavity for FACS analysis, and analysis of IL-10 GFP production by individual subsets was then assessed. The IL-10 GFP expression was primarily detected by a population of CD11b+ cells comprised of CD11bintCD19+CD5+ B1a cells, CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6C+ MDSCs, and CD11b+F480+ macrophages (C). Values are expressed as mean absolute numbers of IL-10 GFP+ cells ± SEM (n = 6–7) (D). Data represent pooled data from three independent experiments, all of which demonstrated a similar trend. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA with a Tukey posttest. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p ≤ 0.001.

To determine the source of the IL-10–producing cells, WT or IL-10 GFP mice were infected with S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) or sterile PBS as a control. At 3 h postinfection, ∼2.5% of the total peritoneal cells were IL-10 GFP+ as assessed by flow cytometry. Of this IL-10 GFP+ population, three distinct subsets of IL-10–producing cells were identified: CD11bintCD19+ cells, CD11bhighF480+ macrophages, and a population of CD11b+Ly6g+Ly6c+ MDSCs (Fig. 1C). Further analysis of the IL-10 GFP+CD11bintCD19+ population confirmed that these cells were primarily CD5a+CD1d and thus represented B1a cells, with a smaller population of IL-10–producing CD5aCd1d B1b B cells. Considering the absolute numbers of IL-10–producing cells present within the peritoneal cavity at 3 h, we can see that B1a cells represent the primary source of IL-10 within the peritoneal cavity at this early time point (Fig. 1D). No other IL-10–producing subsets of B cells or CD4+ T cells were found at this time point postinfection. Consistent with the ELISA data, by 12 h postinfection the GFP signal within the peritoneal cavity was below the level of detection. We were unable to detect any IL-10 GFP signal in the blood 3 h postinfection likely due to the low concentrations of IL-10 that are present at this site. Furthermore, we did not detect IL-10 production within the spleen or the draining mediastinal lymph nodes at 3 h following S. aureus peritoneal challenge (Supplemental Fig. 1).

IL-10 protects against host morbidity and mortality during acute S. aureus peritonitis

Having established that IL-10 is rapidly produced both locally and systemically during S. aureus acute peritoneal infection, we determined the importance of this cytokine in disease outcome. WT and IL-10−/− mice were infected with S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) via i.p. injection. At various time points postinfection, changes in core body temperature were measured as readout of morbidity. In IL-10−/− mice, core body temperature increased significantly compared with WT mice throughout the first 24 h of infection (Fig. 2A). Using an alternative invasive strain of S. aureus, PS80 (31), at a higher challenge inoculum (5 × 108 CFU) we demonstrated increased mortality in the IL-10−/− mice following S. aureus i.p. challenge (Table I).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2.

IL-10−/− mice demonstrate increased morbidity and systemic dissemination of bacteria during S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). Rectal body temperatures were recorded immediately before infection and at specific time points throughout the course of the infection (A). Bacterial burden in the blood was assessed at 3 h postinfection (B). At the indicated time points after challenge, the bacterial burden in the kidneys (C), spleen (D), liver (E), and peritoneal cavity (F) were assessed. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM log CFU/ml (n = 4–5). Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test or two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05.

Table I. Survival of WT and IL-10−/− mice at 72 h following i.p. challenge.

Strain Survival at 72 h (n = 10) % Survival p Value
WT 10 100
IL-10−/− 3 30 p ≤ 0.05

Having established the importance of IL-10 in protecting the host from significant morbidity and mortality, we questioned whether IL-10 was important for controlling bacterial clearance in vivo. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice were administered S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) via i.p. injection, and bacterial burden in the blood, peritoneal cavity, kidney, spleen, and liver was assessed. IL-10−/− mice had higher levels of bacterial burden in the blood at 3 h postinfection (Fig. 2B). By day 7 postinfection WT mice had effectively cleared the infection (≤1 log CFU remaining at the site of infection and within the organs). However, clearance of infection was impaired in the IL-10−/− mice. On days 3 and 7 postinfection, IL-10−/− mice displayed elevated bacterial burdens in the kidney (Fig. 2C), spleen (Fig. 2D), and liver (Fig. 2E) and a higher bacterial burden locally in the peritoneal cavity on day 7 (Fig. 2F), compared with WT mice. Taken together, we can conclude that IL-10 plays an overall protective role during S. aureus acute systemic peritonitis and prevents bacterial dissemination to peripheral organs.

IL-10 is critical for controlling inflammation during acute S. aureus peritonitis

IL-10 has previously been shown to be critical for constraining excessive inflammatory responses during infection with other organisms (5), and therefore we examined the requirement for IL-10 in controlling both local and systemic immune responses to S. aureus acute peritonitis. WT and IL-10−/− mice were challenged with S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) via i.p. injection, and local and systemic cytokine and chemokine concentrations were assessed in the peritoneal lavage fluid and sera over time. As expected, in the absence of IL-10, proinflammatory cytokine concentrations were significantly elevated as compared with WT mice both locally within the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 3) and systemically (Fig. 4).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3.

IL-10 deficiency results in excessive proinflammatory cytokine production locally in response to S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). At the indicated time points after challenge, the peritoneal cavity was lavaged and the concentrations of IL-1β (A), TNF-α (B), IL-17 (C), IFN-γ (D), IL-22 (E), and CXCL1 (F) were measured by ELISA. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5). Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p ≤ 0.001.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4.

IL-10 deficiency results in excessive proinflammatory cytokine production systemically in response to S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). At the indicated time points after challenge, the sera were isolated from the blood and the concentrations of IL-17 (A), IFN-γ (B), and CXCL1 (C) were measured by ELISA. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5). Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005.

We and others have previously demonstrated important protective roles for IL-17–producing γδ+ T cells and IFN-γ–producing Th1 cells during S. aureus infection through the ability of these cytokines to regulate the recruitment and activation of both neutrophils and macrophages, respectively (30, 32). To ascertain whether IL-10 acts upstream to regulate the effects of these T cells, T cell activation and associated phagocytic cell responses were assessed within the peritoneal cavity at specific time points postinfection in WT and IL-10−/− mice. At 3 h postinfection, IL-17 production by γδ+ T cells was significantly increased in the absence of IL-10 (Fig. 5A), and a significant increase in IFN-γ production by CD4+ T cells was observed on day 7 postinfection in the IL-10−/− mice infected with S. aureus compared with WT control mice (Fig. 5B). Similar to the situation in WT mice (30, 32), we did not observe any increased production of IL-17 by CD4+ T cells or IFN-γ production by γδ+ T cells even in the absence of IL-10 (data not shown). These data demonstrate that in the absence of IL-10, IL-17 production by γδ+ T cells is exacerbated initially during infection. Additionally, IFN-γ–producing CD4+ T cells, generally only significantly detected in the context of a memory response (32), are prominent in the absence of IL-10.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5.

IL-10 deficiency results in an increased IL-17 and IFN-γ secretion by γδ+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively, locally in response to S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). Leukocytes were isolated from the peritoneal cavity for FACS analysis to assess the proportions of IL-17–producing γδ+ T cells at 3 h (A) and IFN-γ–producing CD4+ T cells on day 7 (B) postinfection. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5) with representative FACS plots shown. Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test. **p ≤ 0.005.

In the absence of IL-10 there was significantly higher numbers of neutrophils (CD11b+F480Ly6G+) recruited to the peritoneal cavity at 3 h postinfection when compared with WT mice infected with S. aureus (Fig. 6A). Neutrophil activation as assessed by ROS activity was also elevated at this time point in the IL-10−/− mice (Fig. 6B). At 24 h postinfection, macrophage (CD11b+F480+Ly6G) recruitment was also significantly increased in IL-10−/− mice, compared with WT mice (Fig. 6C). Moreover, these macrophages expressed significantly higher levels of the activation marker NOS2 (Fig. 6D) at this time point. Taken together, it appears that in the absence of IL-10, overactive γδ+ T cell and Th1 responses lead to excessive recruitment and activation of phagocytes that are normally required for the clearance of S. aureus, but in this case may be contributing to host pathology and subsequent bacterial dissemination.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6.

IL-10 deficiency results in increased migration and activation of neutrophils and macrophages locally in the peritoneal cavity in response to S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). At indicated time points after infection, leukocytes were isolated from the peritoneal cavity for FACS analysis to assess the absolute number of neutrophils (CD11b+Ly6G+) present (A) and their production of ROS, detected by rhodamine+ cells post at 3 h postinfection (B). At indicated time points after challenge, the absolute numbers of macrophages (CD11b+F480+) present within the peritoneal cavity were also assessed (C), as was their expression of NOS2 at 24 h postinfection (D). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5). Representative FACS plots are shown for (B) and (D). Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test test or two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005.

The protective role of IL-10 is nonredundant and cannot be compensated for by other immune-regulatory mechanisms

To establish whether IL-10 plays a nonredundant protective role during acute S. aureus peritonitis, TGF-β concentrations and Treg responses were assessed within the peritoneal cavities of WT and IL-10−/− mice following S. aureus challenge. We found that IL-10 deficiency resulted in a slight increase in the concentrations of the anti-inflammatory cytokine TGF-β (Fig. 7A) and significantly elevated levels of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Tregs (Fig. 7B) locally within the peritoneal cavity at 12 and 24 h postinfection in IL-10−/− as compared with WT mice. Moreover, these Tregs expressed higher levels of the suppressive marker programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) in the absence of IL-10 (Fig. 7C). These data demonstrate that although Tregs appear to be expanded and express greater levels of PD-1, presumably as a compensatory mechanism in the absence of IL-10, this does not appear to be sufficient to suppress or control effector T cell responses and protect the animals from the significant pathology associated with the IL-10 deficiency.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7.

IL-10 deficiency results in increased concentrations of TGF-β and Tregs locally in the peritoneal cavity in response to S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). At the indicated time points after challenge, the peritoneal cavity was lavaged and the concentration of TGF-β (A) was measured by ELISA. At indicated time points after infection, leukocytes were isolated from the peritoneal cavity for FACS analysis to assess the proportion of Tregs (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+) (B) and their expression of PD-1 (C). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5) with representative FACS plots shown. Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. **p ≤ 0.005, ***p ≤ 0.001.

B1a cells directly activated by S. aureus in a TLR2-dependant mechanism produce IL-10, which in turn controls bacterial dissemination during acute S. aureus peritonitis

Our results indicate that IL-10 produced primarily by peritoneal resident B1a cells contributes to the protection of the host from increased morbidity caused by excessive inflammation and bacterial dissemination during acute peritoneal infection. To determine whether B1a cells produce IL-10 directly in response to S. aureus, CD11bintCD19+CD5+ B cells were purified from the peritoneal cavities of naive WT mice and cultured in vitro in the presence of live S. aureus (MOI of 100). After 18 h, IL-10 production was substantially increased as compared with B1a cells cultured in media alone (Fig. 8A). Previous studies have indicated that S. aureus–induced IL-10 production by macrophages is TLR2 dependent (33). To investigate a potential role for TLR2 in B1a cell activation by S. aureus, we cultured naive B1a cells isolated from WT or TLR2−/− mice in the presence of live S. aureus (MOI of 100). B1a cells isolated from TLR2−/− mice produced significantly less IL-10 compared with WT B1a cells in response to S. aureus stimulation (Fig. 8A). This demonstrates that IL-10 production by B1a cells in response to S. aureus is completely dependent on TLR2 engagement.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8.

S. aureus can directly induce IL-10 production by B1a cells via TLR2 activation, and these B1a cells can protect against bacterial dissemination during S. aureus–induced acute peritoneal infection. Peritoneal B1a cells (CD11b+CD19+CD5+) were isolated from the peritoneal cavity of naive WT and TLR2−/− mice and were cultured in vitro with live S. aureus (Newman) at an MOI of 100 for 18 h. IL-10 concentrations in the supernatant were then assessed by ELISA (A). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Groups of IL-10−/− mice received an adoptive transfer of naive IL-10–sufficient B1a (2 × 105) cells originating from the peritoneal cavity of WT mice. At 12 h after transfer, mice were challenged with an i.p. injection of S. aureus (Newman, 1 × 108 CFU). On day 5 after challenge the bacterial burden was assessed in the peritoneal cavity (B), kidneys (C), and spleen (D). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 9–12). Data represent pooled data from three individual experiments, all of which showed a similar trend. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test or a Mann–Whitney U test. **p ≤ 0.005, ***p ≤ 0.001.

To confirm a direct protective role for B1a cells in S. aureus infection, we adoptively transferred B1a cells (2 × 105), purified from the peritoneal cavity of naive WT mice, to IL-10–deficient hosts. At 12 h posttransfer the recipient mice were challenged with S. aureus (1 × 108 CFU) and bacterial burden in the peritoneal cavity and peripheral organs was assessed on day 5 postinfection. At 3 h postinfection IL-10 production was shown to be significantly induced in IL-10−/− mice that received WT IL-10–sufficient B1a cells (Supplemental Fig. 2). Although there was no reduction in the levels of S. aureus recovered from the site of infection (peritoneal cavity) in the IL-10−/− mice that received WT B1a cells compared with the PBS treated controls (Fig. 8B), there was a significant reduction in dissemination of S. aureus to the kidney (Fig. 8C) and spleen (Fig. 8D) in the mice that received the B1a cells as compared with the control mice. Importantly, adoptive transfer of IL-10–deficient B1a cells failed to control dissemination (Supplemental Fig. 2). This confirms that IL-10–producing B1a cells are critically important for containing the bacteria locally in the peritoneal cavity, preventing its dissemination to the peripheral organs.

IL-10 contributes to disease pathology during acute s.c. S. aureus infection by suppressing local proinflammatory cytokine production

Having observed that IL-10 is critical for constraining inflammation and protecting against bacterial dissemination during acute systemic peritonitis, we wanted to establish whether IL-10 played a similar role during an acute S. aureus infection at an alternative localized site.

WT and IL-10−/− mice were challenged with S. aureus USA 300 LAC::lux (2 × 107 CFU) via s.c. injection, and at specific time points postinfection lesion sizes, in vivo bioluminescent activity of live bacteria, and local cytokine production were assessed within the skin.

We found that during acute s.c. infection, IL-10−/− mice had reduced lesion sizes as compared with WT mice (Fig. 9A). Additionally, bioluminescent activity at the site of infection (Fig. 9B) was substantially reduced in the IL-10−/− mice as compared with the WT mice at all time points up to day 7, at which point the bioluminescent activity was no longer detectable in the IL-10−/− mice. Similar to the in vivo bioluminescence activity, S. aureus CFU recovered from 8-mm punch biopsies were significantly reduced in the IL-10−/− mice as compared with WT mice on day 3 (Fig. 9C). Importantly, we observed no dissemination of S. aureus to systemic sites in either the WT or the IL-10−/− mice.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9.

IL-10 deficiency results in reduced lesion size and reduced bacterial burden in response to s.c. challenge with S. aureus. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an s.c. infection of S. aureus (USA300 LAC::lux, 2 × 107 CFU). At indicated time points after challenge, the mean total lesion size (square centimeters) ± SEM was assessed (A), and representative lesions for each mouse strain at each time point are shown (B). Mean total flux (photons per second per steradian) ± SEM was assessed (C), representative in vivo bioluminescence images for each mouse strain at each time point are shown (D). Bacterial burden in the skin lesion was quantified on day 3 postinfection by 8 mm biopsy punch (E). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 4–5). Data are representative of two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using a Mann–Whitney U test or two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05.

To investigate the mechanism by which IL-10 is facilitating bacterial persistence in the skin, we examined the local immune responses to S. aureus at the site of infection. Local tissue cytokine and chemokine concentrations were assessed in the skin at specific time points postinfection. We confirmed that IL-10 was being produced locally in the skin in WT mice following S. aureus challenge, and, importantly, concentrations remained elevated throughout the course of the infection (Fig. 10A). Within the skin, populations of CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs and CD11b+F4/80+ macrophages were identified as the primary sources of IL-10 during S. aureus s.c. infection (Fig. 10B, 10C). IL-10 production was not detected from either CD4+ T cells or B cells in the skin. Furthermore, we did not detect IL-10 production within the draining lymph node on day 3 (Fig. 10B). In the absence of IL-10, concentrations of IL-17, IL-22, and CXCL1 within the skin were significantly elevated, and there was a trend toward an increase in IL-1β production in the skin of IL-10−/− as compared with WT mice (Fig. 11). γδ+ T cells have previously been shown to be critically important for controlling bacterial burden within the skin during S. aureus s.c. infection where they direct neutrophil recruitment to the skin site (34). In line with this, we observed a significant increase in γδ+ T cells locally in the skin at 8 h postinfection in the absence of IL-10 (Fig. 12A). Furthermore, increased neutrophil and macrophage recruitment to the skin lesion was also observed in the IL-10−/− mice compared with the WT mice on day 1 (Fig. 12B). Although an increase in IFN-γ production within the skin was observed at day 7 in the absence of IL-10 (Supplemental Fig. 3B), CD4+ T cells were not identified as a major cell population infiltrating the skin during an S. aureus infection in either WT or IL-10−/− mice (Supplemental Fig. 3A). This is consistent with previous studies that have shown that IFN-γR−/− mice had lesion sizes and bacterial burdens similar to those of WT mice following an S. aureus skin infection (34). Overall, these results demonstrate that during acute S. aureus skin infection, IL-10 is capable of dampening down local proinflammatory responses and in particular γδ+ T cell responses, which facilitates persistence of the infection.

FIGURE 10.

FIGURE 10.

S. aureus acute s.c. infection induces local IL-10 production at the site of infection. Groups of WT mice received an s.c. injection of S. aureus (USA300 LAC::luc, 2 × 107 CFU). At specific time points after infection, skin biopsies were harvested, homogenized, and the concentration IL-10 was measured by ELISA (A). IL-10 GFP reporter mice received an s.c. injection of S. aureus (USA300 LAC::luc, 2 × 107 CFU). On day 3 postinfection, leukocytes were isolated from the skin lesion and local draining lymph node for FACS analysis, and analysis of IL-10 GFP production by individual subsets was then assessed. The IL-10 GFP expression was primarily detected by a population of CD11b+ cells comprised of CD11b+Gr-1+ MDSCs and CD11b+F480+ macrophages in the skin (B). Values are expressed as mean absolute numbers of IL-10 GFP+ cells ± SEM (n = 6–7) (C). Data represent pooled data from three independent experiments, all of which demonstrated a similar trend. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA with a Tukey posttest. *p ≤ 0.05.

FIGURE 11.

FIGURE 11.

IL-10 deficiency results in increased proinflammatory cytokine production locally in response in response to s.c. challenge with S. aureus. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an s.c. infection of S. aureus (USA300 LAC::lux, 2 × 107 CFU). At the indicated time points after challenge, skin biopsies were harvested, homogenized, and the concentrations of IL-1β (A), IL-17 (B), IL-22 (C), and CXCL1 (D) were measured by ELISA. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 9–10). Data are pooled from two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001.

FIGURE 12.

FIGURE 12.

IL-10 deficiency results in increased γδ+ T cell and phagocyte migration locally in response to S. aureus–induced acute s.c. infection. Groups of WT and IL-10−/− mice received an s.c. injection of S. aureus (USA300 LAC::lux, 2 × 107 CFU). At indicated time points after infection, leukocytes were isolated from the skin biopsy for FACS analysis to assess the proportions and absolute numbers of CD3+γδ+ cells at 8 h (A) and CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils and CD11b+F480+ macrophages at 24 h (B). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6–9) with representative FACS plots shown. Data are pooled from two individual experiments. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test. *p ≤ 0.05.

Discussion

The cytokine network plays a pivotal role in orchestrating the inflammatory response to bacterial infections. The balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is critical for ensuring that the host elicits an appropriate response to counteract the invading pathogen, while at the same time preventing unnecessary pathology from excessive inflammation. In this study, we provide significant new insights into the role of IL-10 during both localized and systemic acute S. aureus infection. To date, S. aureus has primarily been shown to manipulate host production of IL-10 for its own advantage to facilitate survival during both chronic systemic and biofilm models of infection (21, 23). Our study demonstrates divergent roles for IL-10 depending on the site of infection. During systemic S. aureus acute peritoneal infection, IL-10 protects the host by controlling proinflammatory responses, in particular effector T cell responses, thus preventing excessive inflammation and associated host pathology. However, via the same mechanism of controlling the proinflammatory response, IL-10 can facilitate bacterial persistence during localized s.c. S. aureus infection. Furthermore, we identified a novel IL-10–producing cell population within the peritoneal cavity during S. aureus–induced peritonitis. We demonstrate that S. aureus is capable of directly activating B-1a cells through TLR2 engagement, leading to substantial IL-10 production. Importantly, these B1a cells are critical in conferring host protection against systemic S. aureus dissemination upon transfer to IL-10–deficient mice during S. aureus–induced peritonitis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report a functionally protective role for B1a cells during S. aureus–induced peritonitis.

During S. aureus–induced peritonitis, we demonstrate rapid induction of IL-10 both locally and systemically. This IL-10 production plays a nonredundant role, independent of other regulatory mechanisms in protecting the host from immunopathology and bacterial dissemination by controlling local and systemic proinflammatory responses. In particular, we demonstrate that IL-10 acts upstream of effector T cells, controlling their cytokine responses. We have previously shown that γδ-derived IL-17 and type I immune responses are required at different stages of S. aureus peritoneal infection to promote effective bacterial clearance through the ability of these cytokines to regulate downstream phagocyte responses (30, 32). However, it appears that these T cell responses cannot be allowed to proceed unchecked and that effective resolution of infection requires the γδ+ T cell and CD4+ T cell responses to be tightly controlled so as to avoid host pathology that would ensue from excessive phagocyte activation. In the absence of IL-10, there was a significant expansion of IL-17–producing γδ+ T cells locally at 3 h postinfection as compared with that observed in WT mice. IL-17 can directly control neutrophil activation (35) and, consistent with this, neutrophils produced greater amounts of ROS in the absence of IL-10. Additionally, IFN-γ–producing Th1 cells were also significantly elevated in IL-10−/− mice on day 7 compared with WT mice. This was associated with significantly increased recruitment of macrophages and greater NOS2 production from the macrophages in the absence of IL-10. It has previously been demonstrated that excessive neutrophil migration to the peritoneal cavity leads to increased bacterial burden and mortality as a consequence of S. aureus through its ability to survive intracellularly following i.p. challenge (36); furthermore, we have shown that intracellular survival within phagocytes promotes systemic bacterial dissemination following i.p. challenge with S. aureus (31). Additionally, it has been shown that excessive macrophage activation and proinflammatory cytokine production leads to host tissue injury following acute Citrobacter rodentium infection (37). Consequently, it is clear that these phagocytic responses and by extension effector T cell responses controlling these phagocytes must be tightly regulated during bacterial infection so as to constrain bacterial dissemination and prevent associated host immunopathology.

In contrast to the host-protective role of IL-10 during acute systemic peritoneal infection, IL-10 appears to facilitate bacterial persistence during acute localized s.c. infection. IL-10 production was sustained locally within the skin tissue up to 7 d after s.c. infection with S. aureus. In this localized s.c. model of S. aureus infection, MDSCs and macrophages were identified as the main IL-10 producers. This local induction of IL-10 during our S. aureus s.c. infection was associated with persistence of the bacteria within the skin. IL-10−/− mice exhibited reduced lesion size and reduced bacterial burden as evidenced by bioluminescent activity at the site of infection compared with WT mice and had effectively cleared the infection by day 3 as quantified by CFU. In WT mice, appreciable concentrations of bacteria were still recoverable from the skin abscess site at this time point. These results support previous studies, demonstrating that during an S. aureus biofilm infection, IL-10 producing MDSCs prevent the initiation of an appropriate proinflammatory response required for bacterial clearance at this localized site of infection, thereby creating a microenvironment in which it can persist (22, 23). Similar to its role during acute peritonitis, IL-10 appears to be controlling local effector T cell responses in the skin. In the absence of IL-10, substantially greater amounts of proinflammatory cytokines, specifically IL-1β, IL-22, IL-17, and the neutrophil chemoattractant CXCL1, were found locally within the infected tissue compared with WT mice during the course of infection. γδ+ T cells have previously been shown to be critical in the effective clearance of S. aureus from the skin through their ability to produce IL-17 and regulate CXCL1-driven neutrophil recruitment (34). Similarly, during a murine skin abscess model, IL-22 expression was previously identified to be independent of γδ+ T cells (34), but it was shown to be protective through the activation of antimicrobial peptide production (38). Inhibition of either IL-17A or IL-22 alone resulted in significantly larger lesion size, providing further evidence that both IL-17A and IL-22 are necessary for local clearance of S. aureus during an S. aureus skin infection (38, 39). Consistent with this, we observed a significant increase in the influx of γδ+ T cells to the site of infection in the absence of IL-10. This increased migration of γδ+ T cells and elevated production of proinflammatory cytokines, including both IL-17 and IL-22, in the skin resulted in an increased migration of both neutrophils and macrophages to the site of infection in the absence of IL-10, which in turn facilitated a more effective clearance of the infection. Thus, it appears that in the skin once again IL-10 acts upstream to control effector T cells; however, in this case suppression of the T cell response favors the bacterium by impairing the host’s ability to clear the infection. Importantly, during localized s.c. infection, we did not observe any systemic dissemination of bacteria in the absence of IL-10. This is similar to the local chronic biofilm infection model, where the absence of IL-10–producing MDSCs also did not lead to bacterial dissemination (22, 23). Therefore, it appears that during localized S. aureus infection, IL-10 production facilitates bacterial persistence at the site of infection only, but does not promote systemic dissemination.

Taken together, these results demonstrate that the host can tolerate the lack of an IL-10 anti-inflammatory response during local S. aureus infection and in fact removing the brake on the proinflammatory response actually benefits the host by facilitating a more rapid clearance of the bacteria. However, this response cannot be tolerated systemically where a lack of IL-10 leads to excessive proinflammatory responses that are actually detrimental to the host.

Collectively, our current data demonstrate a clear role for IL-10 in controlling T cell and phagocyte activation, which subsequently dictates disease outcome during two contrasting S. aureus infection types. Previously published data have now demonstrated that cellular responses, including Th1, Th17, and γδ+ T cell responses, are all involved in the host defense against S. aureus infections (30, 32, 34, 40); however, their relative prominence varies depending on whether the infection is local or systemic, the anatomical site of the local infection, and whether the infection is acute or chronic. As the skin is the largest organ of the body and an important barrier against invading bacteria, it comprises a complex immune system involving DCs, keratinocytes, T cells, and regulatory B cells that create a tolerant microenvironment to prevent undesirable inflammation in response to commensal organisms (41, 42). We now show that S. aureus can manipulate this cellular environment to its own advantage, inducing IL-10 production from MDSCs and macrophages, but not B cells, to facilitate its persistence within this niche. In contrast, a systemic infection leads to a more hostile inflammatory host response, as there is a greater impetus on host protection. Unlike the localized environment in the skin where immune cells can become tolerogenic due to constant bacterial exposure (43), during a systemic infection the cellular environment is primed for a more robust proinflammatory response to S. aureus in this setting.

Our studies have uncovered a previously undocumented immune-regulatory role for B1 cells during acute systemic S. aureus peritoneal infection. Following i.p. challenge with S. aureus, IL-10 is rapidly produced locally by a population of B1 cells comprising both B1a and B1b subsets. Consistent with previously published studies (23, 44), CD11b+Ly6G+Ly6C+ MDSCs and CD11b+F480+ macrophages were also capable of producing IL-10 at this site; however, the B1a response dominated. Interestingly, CD4+ T cells or Tregs did not appear to produce IL-10 at this site, although they have been shown to be an important source of IL-10 during pulmonary infections (14). Adoptive transfer of IL-10–sufficient B1a cells conferred protection in recipient IL-10−/− mice and prevented bacterial dissemination, suggesting that these IL-10–producing B1a cells are critical for protecting the host from increased morbidity and potentially mortality associated with acute systemic S. aureus infection, presumably as a consequence of the ability of these cells to constrain excessive proinflammatory responses. This is consistent with other studies showing peritoneal B1 cells capable of immunosuppression and host protection in response to systemic Coxiella burnetii infection (45).

When considering the role of B cells during S. aureus infections, focus has almost exclusively been on their function as Ab producers (40). In this study, we report an immune-protective role for IL-10+ B1 cells during S. aureus infection. B1 cells represent a regulatory innate-like population highly enriched in peritoneal, pleural cavities and more recently in the skin during inflammation, and they are capable of potent IL-10 production (41, 46). However, we did not identify any influx of IL-10+ B1 cells from the peritoneal cavity to the skin during s.c. S. aureus infection. These IL-10–producing B1a cells have previously been shown to be capable of limiting NK/NKT cell inflammation and macrophage activation following a pulmonary challenge with Francisella tularensis (47) and Th1 responses during colitis (48). They have been shown to respond to TLR activation and express B cell receptors that often recognize conserved pathogen patterns (49). B1 cells bridge innate and adaptive immunity by efficiently mounting rapid T cell–independent Ab responses, engaging in phagocytic and antimicrobial activity through the production of IgM (50). We demonstrate that S. aureus can directly activate IL-10 production by B1a cells through engagement of TLR2, and that these cells play a protective role in systemic infection. Importantly, the protective effect of B1a cells is independent of IgM, as we found that the levels of IgM were significantly greater in the absence of IL-10; however, this was not sufficient to prevent immunopathology (Supplemental Fig. 4).

It has previously been shown that upon exposure to S. aureus, human monocytes/macrophages elicit a robust IL-10 response, which in turn suppresses T cell activation (44). S. aureus–induced IL-10 production by monocytes/macrophages is critically TLR2 dependent and, importantly, it appears that S. aureus–induced pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production by these cells can be uncoupled due to the organism’s capacity to manipulate TLR2 plasticity and engage unique downstream signaling pathways (33). We now demonstrate that IL-10 production by B1a cells is also TLR2 dependent. Interestingly, systemic S. aureus infection in TLR2−/− mice also resulted in mortality caused by excessive proinflammatory response and increased bacterial dissemination that was associated with decreased IL-10 production by macrophages (51). This result mirrors that which we observed during systemic infection in IL-10−/− mice suggesting that TLR2-dependent IL-10 production from B1a cells is likely controlling proinflammatory T effector cell responses in this setting.

Overall, this study provides important new insight into the contrasting roles played by IL-10 in response to S. aureus at different infection sites. Additionally, we identify a novel subset of IL-10–producing B cells that undergo rapid activation in response to S. aureus via TLR2 engagement and are important for protecting the host against significant morbidity and mortality associated with acute systemic S. aureus infection. Interestingly, we have found clear contrasting roles for IL-10 during systemic and localized acute S. aureus infection. This suggests that the cellular microenvironment at the site of infection can significantly affect the ultimate disease outcome, potentially due to the presence of different cells being present at the infection site and/or the burden of bacteria present. Ultimately, however, S. aureus maintains a symbiotic relationship with the host. During systemic infection, IL-10 ensures host and, by extension, bacterial survival, whereas during local infection, IL-10 forgoes host morbidity to facilitate bacterial survival. Taken together, these observations suggest that S. aureus–induced immune regulation must be a critically important consideration for immunomodulatory therapeutic intervention and vaccination. Disengaging this immunosuppression may prove beneficial during localized s.c. infection; however, in the context of a systemic infection it is clear that uncontrolled effector T cell responses may be detrimental, which has obvious implications for next-generation vaccine design striving to generate effector T cell responses.

Supplementary Material

Data Supplement
JI_1601018.zip (282.5KB, zip)

Acknowledgments

We thank Barry Moran for assistance with cell sorting and the Comparative Medicine staff at Trinity College Dublin for assisting with animal welfare.

This work was supported in part by Irish Research Council Government of Ireland Postdoctoral Fellowship GOIPD/2014/385 (to M.E.M.), Health Research Board Health Research Award HRA_POR/2012/104 (to R.M.M.), and by Science Foundation Ireland Investigator Project Grant 12/IP/1532 (to R.M.M.).

The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

Abbreviations used in this article:
DC
dendritic cell
MDSC
myeloid-derived suppressor cell
MOI
multiplicity of infection
NOS2
NO synthase 2
PD-1
programmed death protein 1
ROS
reactive oxygen species
Treg
regulatory T cell
TSA
tryptic soy agar
WT
wild-type.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Sabat R., Grütz G., Warszawska K., Kirsch S., Witte E., Wolk K., Geginat J. 2010. Biology of interleukin-10. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 21: 331–344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ouyang W., Rutz S., Crellin N. K., Valdez P. A., Hymowitz S. G. 2011. Regulation and functions of the IL-10 family of cytokines in inflammation and disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29: 71–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kühn R., Löhler J., Rennick D., Rajewsky K., Müller W. 1993. Interleukin-10-deficient mice develop chronic enterocolitis. Cell 75: 263–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sellon R. K., Tonkonogy S., Schultz M., Dieleman L. A., Grenther W., Balish E., Rennick D. M., Sartor R. B. 1998. Resident enteric bacteria are necessary for development of spontaneous colitis and immune system activation in interleukin-10-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 66: 5224–5231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sewnath M. E., Olszyna D. P., Birjmohun R., ten Kate F. J., Gouma D. J., van Der Poll T. 2001. IL-10-deficient mice demonstrate multiple organ failure and increased mortality during Escherichia coli peritonitis despite an accelerated bacterial clearance. J. Immunol. 166: 6323–6331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gazzinelli R. T., Wysocka M., Hieny S., Scharton-Kersten T., Cheever A., Kühn R., Müller W., Trinchieri G., Sher A. 1996. In the absence of endogenous IL-10, mice acutely infected with Toxoplasma gondii succumb to a lethal immune response dependent on CD4+ T cells and accompanied by overproduction of IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF-α. J. Immunol. 157: 798–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hunter C. A., Ellis-Neyes L. A., Slifer T., Kanaly S., Grünig G., Fort M., Rennick D., Araujo F. G. 1997. IL-10 is required to prevent immune hyperactivity during infection with Trypanosoma cruzi. J. Immunol. 158: 3311–3316. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Li C., Corraliza I., Langhorne J. 1999. A defect in interleukin-10 leads to enhanced malarial disease in Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudi infection in mice. Infect. Immun. 67: 4435–4442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O’Leary S., O’Sullivan M. P., Keane J. 2011. IL-10 blocks phagosome maturation in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected human macrophages. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 45: 172–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Redford P. S., Boonstra A., Read S., Pitt J., Graham C., Stavropoulos E., Bancroft G. J., O’Garra A. 2010. Enhanced protection to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in IL-10-deficient mice is accompanied by early and enhanced Th1 responses in the lung. Eur. J. Immunol. 40: 2200–2210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ross P. J., Lavelle E. C., Mills K. H., Boyd A. P. 2004. Adenylate cyclase toxin from Bordetella pertussis synergizes with lipopolysaccharide to promote innate interleukin-10 production and enhances the induction of Th2 and regulatory T cells. Infect. Immun. 72: 1568–1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.McGuirk P., McCann C., Mills K. H. 2002. Pathogen-specific T regulatory 1 cells induced in the respiratory tract by a bacterial molecule that stimulates interleukin 10 production by dendritic cells: a novel strategy for evasion of protective T helper type 1 responses by Bordetella pertussis. J. Exp. Med. 195: 221–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Higgs R., Higgins S. C., Ross P. J., Mills K. H. G. 2012. Immunity to the respiratory pathogen Bordetella pertussis. Mucosal Immunol. 5: 485–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Coleman M. M., Finlay C. M., Moran B., Keane J., Dunne P. J., Mills K. H. 2012. The immunoregulatory role of CD4+FoxP3+CD25 regulatory T cells in lungs of mice infected with Bordetella pertussis. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 64: 413–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Brown A. F., Leech J. M., Rogers T. R., McLoughlin R. M. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus colonization: modulation of host immune response and impact on human vaccine design. Front. Immunol. 4: 507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Melzer M., Welch C. 2013. Thirty-day mortality in UK patients with community-onset and hospital-acquired meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. J. Hosp. Infect. 84: 143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Thammavongsa V., Kim H. K., Missiakas D., Schneewind O. 2015. Staphylococcal manipulation of host immune responses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13: 529–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Foster T. J. 2005. Immune evasion by staphylococci. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 948–958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Li Z., Peres A. G., Damian A. C., Madrenas J. 2015. Immunomodulation and disease tolerance to Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens 4: 793–815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ziegler C., Goldmann O., Hobeika E., Geffers R., Peters G., Medina E. 2011. The dynamics of T cells during persistent Staphylococcus aureus infection: from antigen-reactivity to in vivo anergy. EMBO Mol. Med. 3: 652–666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tebartz C., Horst S. A., Sparwasser T., Huehn J., Beineke A., Peters G., Medina E. 2015. A major role for myeloid-derived suppressor cells and a minor role for regulatory T cells in immunosuppression during Staphylococcus aureus infection. J. Immunol. 194: 1100–1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Heim C. E., Vidlak D., Scherr T. D., Kozel J. A., Holzapfel M., Muirhead D. E., Kielian T. 2014. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells contribute to Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection. J. Immunol. 192: 3778–3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heim C. E., Vidlak D., Kielian T. 2015. Interleukin-10 production by myeloid-derived suppressor cells contributes to bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic biofilm infection. J. Leukoc. Biol. 98: 1003–1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Heim C. E., Vidlak D., Scherr T. D., Hartman C. W., Garvin K. L., Kielian T. 2015. IL-12 promotes myeloid-derived suppressor cell recruitment and bacterial persistence during Staphylococcus aureus orthopedic implant infection. J. Immunol. 194: 3861–3872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kamanaka M., Kim S. T., Wan Y. Y., Sutterwala F. S., Lara-Tejero M., Galán J. E., Harhaj E., Flavell R. A. 2006. Expression of interleukin-10 in intestinal lymphocytes detected by an interleukin-10 reporter knockin tiger mouse. Immunity 25: 941–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mulcahy M. E., Geoghegan J. A., Monk I. R., O’Keeffe K. M., Walsh E. J., Foster T. J., McLoughlin R. M. 2012. Nasal colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus depends upon clumping factor B binding to the squamous epithelial cell envelope protein loricrin. PLoS Pathog. 8: e1003092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tzianabos A. O., Wang J. Y., Lee J. C. 2001. Structural rationale for the modulation of abscess formation by Staphylococcus aureus capsular polysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 9365–9370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thurlow L. R., Hanke M. L., Fritz T., Angle A., Aldrich A., Williams S. H., Engebretsen I. L., Bayles K. W., Horswill A. R., Kielian T. 2011. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms prevent macrophage phagocytosis and attenuate inflammation in vivo. J. Immunol. 186: 6585–6596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Richardson M. P., Ayliffe M. J., Helbert M., Davies E. G. 1998. A simple flow cytometry assay using dihydrorhodamine for the measurement of the neutrophil respiratory burst in whole blood: comparison with the quantitative nitrobluetetrazolium test. J. Immunol. Methods 219: 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Murphy A. G., O’Keeffe K. M., Lalor S. J., Maher B. M., Mills K. H., McLoughlin R. M. 2014. Staphylococcus aureus infection of mice expands a population of memory γδ T cells that are protective against subsequent infection. [Published erratum appears in 2015 J. Immunol. 194: 4588.] J. Immunol. 192: 3697–3708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.O’Keeffe K. M., Wilk M. M., Leech J. M., Murphy A. G., Laabei M., Monk I. R., Massey R. C., Lindsay J. A., Foster T. J., Geoghegan J. A., McLoughlin R. M. 2015. Manipulation of autophagy in phagocytes facilitates Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection. Infect. Immun. 83: 3445–3457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Brown A. F., Murphy A. G., Lalor S. J., Leech J. M., O’Keeffe K. M., Mac Aogáin M., O’Halloran D. P., Lacey K. A., Tavakol M., Hearnden C. H., et al. 2015. Memory Th1 cells are protective in invasive Staphylococcus aureus infection. PLoS Pathog. 11: e1005226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Peres A. G., Stegen C., Li J., Xu A. Q., Levast B., Surette M. G., Cousineau B., Desrosiers M., Madrenas J. 2015. Uncoupling of pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 83: 1587–1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cho J. S., Pietras E. M., Garcia N. C., Ramos R. I., Farzam D. M., Monroe H. R., Magorien J. E., Blauvelt A., Kolls J. K., Cheung A. L., et al. 2010. IL-17 is essential for host defense against cutaneous Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 120: 1762–1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Rigby K. M., DeLeo F. R. 2012. Neutrophils in innate host defense against Staphylococcus aureus infections. Semin. Immunopathol. 34: 237–259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Gresham H. D., Lowrance J. H., Caver T. E., Wilson B. S., Cheung A. L., Lindberg F. P. 2000. Survival of Staphylococcus aureus inside neutrophils contributes to infection. J. Immunol. 164: 3713–3722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Krause P., Morris V., Greenbaum J. A., Park Y., Bjoerheden U., Mikulski Z., Muffley T., Shui J. W., Kim G., Cheroutre H., et al. 2015. IL-10-producing intestinal macrophages prevent excessive antibacterial innate immunity by limiting IL-23 synthesis. Nat. Commun. 6: 7055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chan L. C., Chaili S., Filler S. G., Barr K., Wang H., Kupferwasser D., Edwards J. E., Jr., Xiong Y. Q., Ibrahim A. S., Miller L. S., et al. 2015. Nonredundant roles of interleukin-17A (IL-17A) and IL-22 in murine host defense against cutaneous and hematogenous infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 83: 4427–4437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lacey K. A., Geoghegan J. A., McLoughlin R. M. 2016. The role of Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in skin infection and their potential as vaccine antigens. Pathogens 5: 22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Montgomery C. P., Daniels M., Zhao F., Alegre M. L., Chong A. S., Daum R. S. 2014. Protective immunity against recurrent Staphylococcus aureus skin infection requires antibody and interleukin-17A. Infect. Immun. 82: 2125–2134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Geherin S. A., Gómez D., Glabman R. A., Ruthel G., Hamann A., Debes G. F. 2016. IL-10+ innate-like B cells are part of the skin immune system and require α4β1 integrin to migrate between the peritoneum and inflamed skin. J. Immunol. 196: 2514–2525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Girard-Madoux M. J., Kel J. M., Reizis B., Clausen B. E. 2012. IL-10 controls dendritic cell–induced T-cell reactivation in the skin to limit contact hypersensitivity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129: 143–150.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Manicassamy S., Pulendran B. 2011. Dendritic cell control of tolerogenic responses. Immunol. Rev. 241: 206–227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Frodermann V., Chau T. A., Sayedyahossein S., Toth J. M., Heinrichs D. E., Madrenas J. 2011. A modulatory interleukin-10 response to staphylococcal peptidoglycan prevents Th1/Th17 adaptive immunity to Staphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 204: 253–262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Schoenlaub L., Elliott A., Freches D., Mitchell W. J., Zhang G. 2015. Role of B cells in host defense against primary Coxiella burnetii infection. Infect. Immun. 83: 4826–4836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pfau J. C., Hurley K., Peterson C., Coker L., Fowers C., Marcum R. 2014. Activation and trafficking of peritoneal B1a B-cells in response to amphibole asbestos. J. Immunotoxicol. 11: 90–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Crane D. D., Griffin A. J., Wehrly T. D., Bosio C. M. 2013. B1a cells enhance susceptibility to infection with virulent Francisella tularensis via modulation of NK/NKT cell responses. J. Immunol. 190: 2756–2766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Maseda D., Candando K. M., Smith S. H., Kalampokis I., Weaver C. T., Plevy S. E., Poe J. C., Tedder T. F. 2013. Peritoneal cavity regulatory B cells (B10 cells) modulate IFN-γ+CD4+ T cell numbers during colitis development in mice. J. Immunol. 191: 2780–2795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhang X. 2013. Regulatory functions of innate-like B cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 10: 113–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gao J., Ma X., Gu W., Fu M., An J., Xing Y., Gao T., Li W., Liu Y. 2012. Novel functions of murine B1 cells: active phagocytic and microbicidal abilities. Eur. J. Immunol. 42: 982–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yimin M., Kohanawa M., Zhao S., Ozaki M., Haga S., Nan G., Kuge Y., Tamaki N. 2013. Contribution of Toll-like receptor 2 to the innate response against Staphylococcus aureus infection in mice. PLoS One 8: e74287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Supplement
JI_1601018.zip (282.5KB, zip)

Articles from The Journal of Immunology Author Choice are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES