Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 6;7:43570. doi: 10.1038/srep43570

Contribution of engineered nanomaterials physicochemical properties to mast cell degranulation

Monica M Johnson 1, Ryan Mendoza 1, Achyut J Raghavendra 2,3, Ramakrishna Podila 2,3, Jared M Brown 1,a
PMCID: PMC5337938  PMID: 28262689

Abstract

The rapid development of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) has grown dramatically in the last decade, with increased use in consumer products, industrial materials, and nanomedicines. However, due to increased manufacturing, there is concern that human and environmental exposures may lead to adverse immune outcomes. Mast cells, central to the innate immune response, are one of the earliest sensors of environmental insult and have been shown to play a role in ENM-mediated immune responses. Our laboratory previously determined that mast cells are activated via a non-FcεRI mediated response following silver nanoparticle (Ag NP) exposure, which was dependent upon key physicochemical properties. Using bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs), we tested the hypothesis that ENM physicochemical properties influence mast cell degranulation. Exposure to 13 physicochemically distinct ENMs caused a range of mast degranulation responses, with smaller sized Ag NPs (5 nm and 20 nm) causing the most dramatic response. Mast cell responses were dependent on ENMs physicochemical properties such as size, apparent surface area, and zeta potential. Surprisingly, minimal ENM cellular association by mast cells was not correlated with mast cell degranulation. This study suggests that a subset of ENMs may elicit an allergic response and contribute to the exacerbation of allergic diseases.


Nanotechnology has grown exponentially over the last several decades, spurring the rapid development of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) for applications in markets including technology, consumer products, and nanomedicines. The unique properties are useful for improving product formulations and efficacy in targeted imaging and drug delivery1,2. However, due to the increased exposure from extensive manufacturing and incorporation into consumer products, concerns are raised regarding ENM safety and effect on human and environmental health3.

The field of nanotoxicology has begun addressing these concerns and it has become clear that the physicochemical properties of ENMs (size, chemical composition and stability, morphology, surface modifications, etc.) contribute to both desired and undesired biological outcomes4,5. Our increased understanding of the role for physicochemical properties in biological responses to ENMs will improve safety, however it presents a grand challenge for the field as the number of ENMs and physicochemical modifications continue to rapidly expand. ENMs can be manipulated and manufactured with different sizes, shapes, surface modifications, structural and chemical defects. Several studies observed the dependency of ENM size and surface coating on cellular uptake and membrane internalization6,7. For example, Mukherjee et al., demonstrated that the ENM-ENM interactions as well as the ENM interaction with the biological environment influence ENM agglomeration, dissolution, diffusion, and sedimentation8. These changes are inevitably affecting ENM biodistribution and toxicity in biological systems9,10. Once ENMs enter a biological environment, they are enveloped by proteins, lipids, and macromolecules forming a biocorona, which could drastically modify ENM-bio interactions11,12. The formation of a biocorona adds an additional layer of complexity in assessing toxicity due to modification of surface properties of the ENMs. More research is needed to correlate ENM properties to the physiological responses after exposure but this has become exceedingly difficult due to the lack of standardized dosimetry methods and characterization reported in cytotoxicity studies.

More effort needs to be focused on allergic responses to ENMs, as this remains a likely immune outcome particularly for metal-based nanoparticles13,14,15. Studying adverse immune responses following ENM exposure has become increasingly important with emergence of nanomedicines, considering drug allergies are a limiting factor for patient compliance and could often lead to drug removal from the market16. Mast cells, involved in the innate and adaptive immune responses functioning in host defense, have been implicated as an early effector cell in response to ENM exposures17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27. They play a predominant role in the development of allergic inflammation, resulting in diseases such as allergies, asthma, and anaphylaxis. In addition, mast cells are involved in wound healing, fibrosis, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmunity17,18,28. Mast cells are activated via crosslinking of high-affinity immunoglobulin E (IgE) receptors (e.g. FcεRI) upon challenge with an allergen. In contrast, they can also be activated via non-IgE- ligands (e.g. toxins, complement components) through various surface receptors (e.g. toll-like receptors, complement receptors, scavenger receptors), or potentially unknown mechanisms29,30,31,32,33,34. Activation corresponds to the release of preformed granules (degranulation) and de novo synthesized mediators (activation) such as histamine, serotonin, proteases, cytokines (TNF-α, TGF-β, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-4, IL-9, IL-13, IL-33), and osteopontin (OPN).

Recent studies have demonstrated the role of mast cell infiltration and activation in response to ENM exposures. Studies have shown that mast cells contribute to ENM-mediated lung inflammation and adverse cardiovascular health effects23,35. In addition, mast cell-deficient mice were protected from pulmonary inflammation following cerium oxide nanoparticle instillation36. Wang et al. demonstrated that TiO2 nanoparticles induced mast cell recruitment in the gastrointestinal tract following a 30 d exposure in Sprague-Dawley rats37. Similarly, Chen et al., observed an increase in histamine release and serum IgE upon TiO2 exposure in vitro24. Oxidative stress was shown to play a role in mast cell-mediated dermal toxicity by single-walled carbon nanotube exposure19. In addition, some ENMs have been shown to be negative regulators of mediator release in mast cell degranulation. For example, fullerenes were shown to inhibit IgE-mediated38 and non-FcεRI-mediated mast cell degranulation and activation, which was dependent on the presence of key moieties and side-chains39. We recently reported that mast cell degranulation occurred after an acute exposure to silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), and was dependent on key physicochemical properties such as size and surface coating40. These and several other studies outlined the ability of ENMs to activate and inhibit mast cell responses in a variety of exposure models. Notwithstanding these results, the underlying mechanisms of ENM-mast cell interactions and the key ENM physicochemical properties in mast cell activation remain unknown.

In this study, we aimed to characterize the physicochemical properties of a library of ENMs and measure mast cell degranulation and activation following exposure to identify properties that may potentially exacerbate an allergic response. We have demonstrated that different ENMs cause a wide range of mast cell responses. ENM physicochemical properties such as size and stability that contribute to total particle surface area were identified as contributing factors in mast cell degranulation.

Results

ENM characterization

The hydrodynamic size and zeta potential of ENMs were measured in both diH2O & HEPES buffer, the biological buffer used for subsequent in vitro assays (Table 1). The shape and size of all ENMs were further confirmed by TEM images (Fig. S1). As expected, the hydrodynamic size in both diH2O and HEPES was significantly higher than the dehydrated size measured using TEM for all ENMs. The largest size difference was observed with TiO2, the primary size measuring 49 nm and the hydrodynamic size measuring 696 nm (diH2O) and 979 nm (HEPES) suggesting the presence of TiO2 aggregates. In addition, we observed significant agglomeration for MgO, SiO2-30 and SiO2-60 based on their large hydrodynamic size relative to the dehydrated TEM size. All ENMs except the four Ag NPs evaluated had low zeta potentials indicating reduced suspension stability. Using the hydrodynamic sizes of each ENM, apparent surface area and total particle number (per gram) were calculated in both diH2O and HEPES (Table 1). Ag-5 and Ag-20 had the largest apparent surface areas and particle numbers per gram in diH2O. The next largest surface area was observed with CuO, measuring at 10.96 m2/g. However, the surface area was drastically decreased once the particles were diluted in HEPES buffer due to agglomeration.

Table 1. Characterization of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs).

ENM Primary Size (nm) Zeta potential (mV) pH Hydrodynamic size (d.nm)
Surface area (m2/g)
Particle number (1 × 1020/g)
H2O HEPES H2O HEPES H2O HEPES
SiO2-30 22 ± 6.6 −17 6.9 530 ± 68 299 ± 85 3.78 6.34 0.98 2.78
SiO2-60 64 ± 7.5 −19 6.8 816 ± 275 282 ± 74 2.10 3.80 0.01 0.60
TiO2 49 ± 7.2 21 6.7 696 ± 75 979 ± 380 1.34 1.15 0.10 0.06
CuO 92 ± 22.7 −12 7.0 73 ± 32 202 ± 24 11.0 2.69 1.69 1.70
BN-UF 50 ± 11.3 −17 7.4 400 ± 78 717 ± 266 4.39 3.20 1.05 0.31
BN-MF 117 ± 35.6 −19 7.0 373 ± 51 566 ± 135 3.50 3.34 0.50 0.36
MgO 95 ± 10.7 12 10.8 793 ± 180 566 ± 14 1.20 1.52 0.09 0.10
Fe2O3 28 ± 8.6 −8 6.7 251 ± 104 356 ± 82 2.91 5.45 0.06 0.57
ZnO 25 ± 6.1 −6 8.1 294 ± 37 621 ± 116 3.77 0.87 1.05 0.04
Ag-5 5.2 ± 0.9 −29 7.5 6.8 ± 0.5 324 ± 017 27.93 0.44 7260.00 0.53
Ag-20 20 ± 4.2 −38 7.8 16 ± 1 223 ± 29 18.50 1.51 1470.00 0.78
Ag-50 51.6 ± 6 −33 7.1 78 ± 23 300 ± 60 7.65 0.48 1600.00 0.67
Ag-110 110 ± 7.7 −36 7.2 107 ± 15 468 ± 209 4.69 1.10 25.50 0.33

Primary size (nm) determined by TEM and hydrodynamic size (d.nm) and zeta potential (mV) were determined by ZetaSizer Nano. Hydrodynamic surface area (m2/g) and particle number (1 × 1020/g) of ENMs were calculated using hydrodynamic size measured in de-ionized H2O and HEPES buffer. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3/group).

ENMs induce minimal cytotoxicity in bone marrow-derived mast cells

Cytotoxicity of BMMCs following exposure to ENMs was evaluated by flow cytometric analysis measuring Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI; Fig. 1). Importantly, BMMCs treated with 25 and 50 μg/ml ENMs for 1 h (time point at which all degranulation studies were performed) showed minimal number of cells undergoing apoptosis or necrosis as measured by Annexin V and PI respectively, further confirming that ENMs are not activating mast cells through a cytotoxic mechanism.

Figure 1. Cytotoxicity of ENMs.

Figure 1

Bone-marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) exposed for 1 h to ENMs at 25 & 50 μg/ml were analyzed via flow cytometry for Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) expression on the surface of apoptotic cells. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 10 mM) and capsaicin (Cap, 100 μM) were used as positive controls (white bars). Horizontal dash line represents NT control values. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (N = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference between non-treated control group (p ≤ 0.05).

ENM cell association by mast cells

We next set out to assess the role of ENM cellular association by mast cells and its contribution to mast cell degranulation (Fig. 2). Following ENM exposure, we observed significant cell association of Fe2O3, ZnO, SiO2-30, SiO2-60, and CuO. BN-MF and BN-UF cell association was below the limit of detection. Interestingly, Ag-20 and Ag-110 were not readily related to mast cell association as compared to the other particles analyzed, suggesting that cell association may not be contributing to mast cell degranulation.

Figure 2. ICP-MS measurement of cell association of ENMs by bone-marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs).

Figure 2

Mast cell association of ENMs was evaluated following 1 h exposure of 5 μg of ENMs. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference between non-treated control groups (p ≤ 0.05). ND indicates non-detectable.

ENMs induce mast cell degranulation

Mast cell degranulation 1 h post exposure to 50 μg/ml of ENMs was assessed by measuring the release of β-hexosaminidase in the supernatant (Fig. 3). In addition, FcεRI crosslinking by dinitrophenyl (DNP) was assessed as a positive control. Ag-20 caused the most dramatic degranulation of mast cells (47%) as measured by β-hexosaminidase release, followed by CuO (14%), SiO2-30 (11%), and SiO2-60 (7%), respectively (Fig. 3a). These particles demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in degranulation at the doses 25, 50, and 100 μg/ml (Fig. S2). Interestingly, TiO2 and Fe2O3 caused an inhibition of mast cell degranulation, however this was not statistically significant. MgO, BN-MF, BN-UF, ZnO, and Ag-110 were not found to cause significant mast cell degranulation compared to non-treated control group (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, we demonstrated that smaller Ag nanoparticles induced the highest percent mast cell degranulation (5 nm, 82%), decreasing in response with an increase in particle size (5, 20, 50, 110 nm; Fig. 4).

Figure 3. ENM-mediated mast cell degranulation.

Figure 3

Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were exposed to ENMs for 1 h and evaluated for the release of β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant. (a) BMMCs were exposed to (a) mass concentrations of ENMs (50 μg/ml) or DNP (100 ng/ml) as an IgE positive control and (c) ENMs normalized to surface area (20 m2/g). Values are expressed as mean ± SEM normalized to non-treated control group (n = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference from non-treated control group (p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 4. Size dependency of Ag NP-mediated mast cell degranulation.

Figure 4

Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were exposed to 50 ug/ml of Ag NPs at different sizes (5, 20, 50, 100 nm) for 1 h and evaluated for the release of β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM normalized to non-treated control group (n = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference from non-treated control group (p ≤ 0.05).

In addition to exposing mast cells to a mass-based concentration of ENMs (μg/ml), we also took into account the changes in hydrodynamic size of each ENM and treated BMMCs with ENM doses normalized to the same total surface area. Apparent surface area was calculated for each ENM using particle densities and hydrodynamic size in HEPES buffer. To evaluate the role of surface area in mast cell response, BMMCs were treated for 1 h with ENMs normalized to total surface area of 20 m2/g (Fig. 3b). The results were similar to the mass-based concentration dosing, with Ag-20 causing the most abundant mast cell degranulation (40%), followed by SiO2-30 (20%), CuO (16%), and SiO2-60 (14%). All other ENMs did not cause significant degranulation compared to control. Overall, we observed a higher percent mast cell degranulation when dosing based on surface area, however the trend did not change when compared to mass based concentration dosing at 50 μg/ml.

Formation of an ENM-biocorona reduces mast cell degranulation

To evaluate the influence of silver nanoparticle-induced mast cell degranulation in a biologically relevant condition, Ag-20 (20 nm) were coated with bovine serum albumin (BSA) to represent a normal serum component and mast cell degranulation was assessed. Formation of a biocorona on Ag-20 resulted in an increase in the hydrodynamic size and decrease in nanoparticle stability in suspension evident by a lower zeta potential as compared to Ag-20 without a biocorona (Table 2). Interestingly, the addition of a BSA biocorona on Ag-20 led to a significant reduction in mast cell degranulation compared to treatment of Ag-20 alone (Fig. 5).

Table 2. Characterization of Ag-20 with the addition of a bovine serum albumin (BSA) biocorona.

Ag NPs +/− serum Hydrodynamic size (d.nm) Zeta potential (mV)
20 nm 20 ± 4.2 −38
20 nm + BSA 121.2 ± 12.8 −18

Hydrodynamic size (d.nm) and zeta potential (mV) were determined by ZetaSizer Nano. Values represent mean ± SEM (n = 3/group).

Figure 5. Influence of an ENM-biocorona on mast cell degranulation.

Figure 5

Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were exposed to 20 nm-sized Ag NPs (Ag-20) with or without the addition of a bovine serum albumin (BSA) biocorona at a concentration of 50 μg/ml for 1 h and evaluated for the release of β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference from non-treated control group and #indicates significant difference between groups with and without a biocorona (p ≤ 0.05).

ENMs did not exacerbate IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation

Next we aimed to evaluate if ENM exposure contributes to IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation in an allergic response. BMMCs were sensitized overnight with IgE anti-DNP, and subsequently treated with ENMs for 1 h (50 μg/ml) followed by stimulation of FcεRI by DNP (100 ng/ml) for 30 min to stimulate IgE- mediated mast cell degranulation (Fig. 6). All ENMs except MgO, ZnO, and CuO did not demonstrate a significant difference in mast cell degranulation when comparing ENM treatment alone to ENM treatment with DNP stimulus (IgE-mediated), suggesting that a subset of ENMs are not interfering with IgE-mediated activation. Surprisingly, CuO inhibited the IgE response when compared to ENM treatment alone. In addition, compared to DNP treatment alone, TiO2, Fe2O3, and ZnO all reduced IgE-mediated degranulation. Overall, mast cell degranulation varies depending on the ENM type, suggesting an essential role for physicochemical properties in mast cell response.

Figure 6. Impact of ENM exposure on IgE meditated mast cell degranulation.

Figure 6

BMMCs were exposed to ENMs (50 μg/ml) for 1 h followed by addition of DNP treatment (100 ng/ml) (black bars) and evaluated for the release of β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM normalized to non-treated control group (n = 3/group). *Indicates significant difference between ENM-treated (white bars) and ENM + DNP-treated groups (black bars) (p ≤ 0.001). #Indicates significant difference between DNP-treated group (striped bar and dashed line) and ENM + DNP- treated groups (black bars) (p ≤ 0.05).

ENM physicochemical properties associated with mast cell degranulation

Spearman’s rank-order test was performed to determine the strength of association between mast cell degranulation (data derived from Figs 3a and 4) and factors including size, stability, apparent surface area, and cell association following exposure (Fig. 7). ENM surface area showed a significant correlation with degranulation (Spearman r = 0.84, p = 0.04 × 10−2), in addition to hydrodynamic size (Spearman r = −0.66, p = 0.01), indicating that mast cell degranulation increased with smaller particle size (Fig. 7a and b, respectively). Zeta potential, also significant, had a negative correlation with mast cell degranulation (Spearman r = −0.57, p = 0.04). Contrary to expectations, cell association of ENMs did not have a significant correlation with mast cell degranulation (Spearman r = 0.12, p = 0.78).

Figure 7. Statistical association calculated between mast cell degranulation and ENM size, apparent surface area, zeta potential, and cellular association.

Figure 7

Correlation using Spearman’s rank-order test was performed on data from bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) treated with 50 μg/ml of ENMs plotted against (a) ENM hydrodynamic size (nm), (b) surface area (m2/g), (c) cell association (μg) and (d) zeta potential (mV) following exposure. Spearmans r and p-value are reported in insert. Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Late-phase mast cell activation following ENM exposure

In addition to assessing immediate phase mast cell activation (i.e. degranulation) following ENM exposure, late-phase mast cell activation was evaluated by measuring the release of osteopontin (OPN), a de novo synthesized mediator which was previously shown to be released in response to Ag-2040. OPN was measured in the supernatant of BMMCs treated for 24 h with ENMs at 50 μg/ml or DNP at 100 ng/ml (n = 3/group) (Fig. 8). Interestingly, OPN was detected in supernatants of BMMCs exposed to DNP and all ENMs except TiO2 and Fe2O3, suggesting that early phase mast cell degranulation is not indicative of late-phase mast cell activation following ENM exposure.

Figure 8. Osteopontin levels were measured in supernatants of BMMCs treated with ENMs by ELISA.

Figure 8

BMMCs were treated with ENMs at 50 μg/ml or DNP at 100 ng/ml as IgE-mediated positive control (stripped bar) for 24 h. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM normalized to non-treated control group (n = 3/group). ND indicates not detected. *Indicates significant difference from non-treated controlled group normalized to 0 (p ≤ 0.05).

Discussion

Engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) with various physicochemical properties (size, chemical composition and stability, morphology, surface modifications, etc.) have been previously shown to contribute to pathophysiological responses, however, it remains to be elucidated how these properties play a role in mast cell activation in an allergic response5. Our previous studies demonstrated the role of mast cells in the contribution to inflammation and pathology induced by cerium oxide and carbon-based ENM exposures23,36. More recently, we have shown that mast cells are activated in response to silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) in a size and shape dependent manner40. The current study investigated the direct interactions of 13 physicochemically distinct ENMs on mast cell activation and degranulation. In summary, we determined that ENMs could induce mast cell degranulation with varying degrees of response depending on the type of ENM and its physicochemical properties. Furthermore, this degranulation response was driven by ENM surface area and not a result of cell association. Our study has provided evidence suggesting a role of ENM physicochemical properties in the activation of adverse mast cell responses.

The library of ENMs utilized in this study were chosen due to their incorporation into pharmaceutical, industrial, and commercial products. ENMs were fully characterized for their size, shape, and stability. Measurement of hydrodynamic size in both de-ionized water (diH2O) and a biological buffer (HEPES) demonstrated that select ENMs were likely agglomerating in solution, leading to changes in apparent surface area and total particle number. Changes in particle size and shape due to agglomeration have been shown to significantly alter ENM reactivity and toxicity41. Agglomeration can be the result of ENM-ENM interactions due to surface collisions, chemical transformations (i.e. oxidation/reduction, dissolution, degradation) or potential interactions with substances in the biological systems (i.e. proteins, macromolecules)42. Our current study demonstrated that an increase in particle size resulted in a decreased mast cell response. This notion was further confirmed in reduced mast cell degranulation observed following treatment with Ag-20 coated with a bovine serum albumin (BSA) biocorona in which nanoparticle size was increased as compared to Ag-20 without a biocorona. Overall, this suggests that stable ENMs not forming large aggregates are likely mediating the observed response.

Mast cells were utilized as the effector cell type specifically for their role in allergic disorders such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis and anaphylaxis18. Located near the host-environment interface, mast cells represent one of the first cell types to likely encounter ENMs17. Aside from occupational or industrial exposures, the emergence of nanomedicines has added a layer of difficulty in evaluating potential adverse immune interactions to ENMs. ENMs are currently being formulated and tested as drug delivery carriers due to their high surface area and ability to bind various compounds and ligands43. Knowledge about their potential toxicity and health impact is essential before these nanomaterials can be used in a clinical setting, as an allergic immune response is often a limiting factor in patient compliance. For example, a clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of Ferraheme, an iron oxide nanoparticle-coated drug used for the treatment of iron anemia in chronic kidney disease patients, demonstrated hypersensitivity reactions as a major safety concern44. To date, there are limited toxicological screening methods to evaluate immune cell activation, specifically an allergic immune response, following ENM exposures or administration of nanomedicines.

In the current study, 20 nm Ag nanoparticles (Ag-20) had the highest stability measured by zeta potential, largest apparent surface area, and subsequently caused the highest degranulation of mast cells. In addition, the robust response to Ag NPs was significantly higher than all other ENMs evaluated as well as being higher than our IgE-mediated (DNP) positive control. Furthermore, mast cell response decreased as particle size increased with no observable response following exposure to 110 nm Ag, further confirming the role of ENM surface area in inducing a mast cell response. Ag NPs are one of the most utilized ENMs due to their antimicrobial properties and are incorporated into over 300 commercially available consumer products45. ENMs utilized as antimicrobial agents often rely on ionic dissolution of select metal-based particles such Ag, zinc, and copper nanoparticles, however ion dissolution has also been linked to toxicity14,46,47. For example, Wang et al., demonstrated a role for smaller Ag NPs (20 nm) to induce cytotoxicity due to a higher rate of dissolution compared to larger Ag NPs (110 nm) in vivo9. Although our current study did not directly measure ion dissolution resulting in mast cell degranulation, our laboratory previously reported that Ag+ ions alone did not induce mast cell degranulation, leading us to believe that ion dissolution is not playing a significant role in ENM-mediated mast cell responses40.

Canonical activation of mast cells via FcεRI crosslinking is primarily through an IgE-dependent mechanism, however our results suggest that select ENMs are activating mast cells through a non-IgE, potentially novel mechanism. Toll-like receptors, complement receptors, and scavenger receptors have been implicated in non-IgE mediated mast cell degranulation following exposure to unknown ligands30,32,33,40. Huang et al., has demonstrated a role for gold nanoparticles to bind and aggregate IgE receptors in the absence of IgE20. Our laboratory, as well as others has demonstrated the role for scavenger receptors in ENM-mediated mast cell activation in vivo and in vitro. Brown et al., identified a scavenger receptor involved in mast cell activation by crystalline silica in an SR-A/MARCO knockout mouse model32. Recently, we have shown that the scavenger receptor B1 is involved in Ag NP (20 nm)-induced mast cell degranulation and could be prevented using a tyrosine kinase inhibitor40. Our current study provides evidence that ENM-induced mast cell degranulation is not through an IgE-mediated response. In addition we speculate that due to lack of internalization, demonstrated in this study as well as other studies performed in our laboratory40,48, Ag NPs are likely modulating surface receptors or non-specific cell membrane interactions leading to the downstream activation of signal transduction pathways.

We demonstrated that exposure to the ENMs evaluated in the current study did not lead to the exacerbation of an allergic response evaluated by IgE-induced mast cell degranulation. However, TiO2, Fe2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles were shown to inhibit IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation to an allergen (DNP). Feltis et al., also demonstrated that ZnO inhibited IgE-dependent mast cell degranulation in a size-dependent matter49. ZnO was also shown to cause down-regulation of pro-inflammatory markers as well as inhibition of anti-DNP IgE-induced anaphylaxis in a mouse model50. Carbon-based ENMs (C60), which alone did not cause a response, were also shown to inhibit IgE-dependent mast cell activation through the reduced activation of global signaling molecules leading to decreased oxidative stress38. Our findings as well as others provide evidence that TiO2, Fe2O3, and ZnO nanoparticles could inhibit an allergic response mediated by mast cell activation.

The current study demonstrates that TiO2 is causing inhibition of mast cell degranulation upon exposure however this is in direct opposition to other studies showing that TiO2 plays a role in immunomodulatory activities51. Wang et al., demonstrated an increase in mast cell infiltration in response to TiO2 exposure in vivo, however showed no observable increase in histamine release, indicating that mast cells were recruited but not activated37. In addition, TiO2 exposure caused a dose-dependent increase in histamine release in a rat mast cell line (RBL-2H3), however the doses (0.1–1000 mg/ml) were much higher than the current study’s experimental doses (<100 μg/ml). This study also reported a much smaller hydrodynamic size for TiO2 at 83 nm and larger surface area of 46.3 m2/g, which could account for the difference in mast cell degranulation compared to our results24. The variation in results of our study compared to other studies could be accounted for by the difference in dosimetry and surface modifications, as other studies used much higher doses (>100 μg/ml) and were also coated with stabilizers to prevent agglomeration.

The focus in much of the literature has been on ENM-induced cytotoxicity while in the present study, we observe minimal cytotoxicity after 1 h and 24 h exposure to ENMs at various doses up to 100 μg/ml. This suggests that ENMs are not altering mast cell activation through an apoptotic or necrotic pathway. A recent study from our laboratory demonstrated that mast cells are not highly phagocytic and therefore are not readily internalizing ENMs, which could account for the difference in cytotoxic responses compared to other immune cell types48. Dendritic cells, neutrophils, and macrophages are all shown to readily phagocytize particles, altering cell viability and function52. The current study demonstrates minimal Ag (20 and 110 nm) association and uptake by mast cells. Iron oxide (Fe2O3) had the highest level of cell association, consistent with previous finding from Toki et al.53. Internalization of selected ENMs by mast cells is a complex process that is likely dependent on a combination of physicochemical properties but may not be a contributing factor mediating mast cell degranulation.

Mast cell exposure to different ENMs resulted in varying degranulation responses, illustrating the importance of physicochemical properties. The literature supports our findings that a subset of ENMs are activating and others are inhibiting mast cell degranulation, which we infer are likely mediated through surface receptor-driven mechanisms. Identifying ENM properties that are functioning as immunomodulators, specifically in the activation of mast cells could provide knowledge for diseases associated with idiopathic mast cell activation disorders, in which the triggers are unknown but the responses are similar to what we observed following ENM exposures54. Future research needs to be performed to elucidate the receptors activated in response to ENM exposures, and the resulting signal transduction pathways that are likely modulating mast cell degranulation and potentially contributing to allergic immune responses.

Methods

Engineered nanoparticles (ENMs)

Silver nanoparticles sizes 5, 20, 50 and 110 nm (Ag-5, Ag-20, Ag-50, Ag-110) suspended in citrate buffer were purchased from NanoComposix at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. All other ENMs used in the study: titanium dioxide (TiO2), iron oxide (Fe2O3), magnesium oxide (MgO), boron nitrite sizes ultrafine (BN-UF) and microfine (BN-MF), zinc oxide (ZnO), silica dioxide sizes 30 nm (SiO2-30) and 60 nm (SiO2-60), and copper oxide (CuO) were purchased from US Research Nanomaterials, Inc and stored as a dried powder at 4 °C until ready for assay preparation. Two-dimensional boron nitride (BN) was synthesized by chemical exfoliation of bulk BN (purchased from Graphene supermarket) using a Branson ultrasonic tip (1/8″ diameter, 250 W)55,56. ZnO nanoparticles were synthesized using a polyol method through drop-wise addition of aqueous Zn acetate and poly-vinylpyrrolidone (PVP) at 100 °C57. Biocorona was formed by incubating Ag-20 (20 nm) with bovine serum albumin (BSA) at a concentration of 100 μg/ml for 1 hour at 37 °C. Following incubation, biocorona was pelleted by centrifugation for 10 min at a speed of 14,000 rpm and then re-suspending in 1 mg/ml of diH2O as previously described11.

ENM characterization

ENMs diluted to 1 mg/ml in deionized (diH2O) water were sonicated for 30-second pulses at 35,000 joules (sonicator, Fisher Scientific). The hydrodynamic size and zeta potentials (ZetaSizer Nano, Malvern) in addition to the pH (Metler Toledo, Columbus, OH) of all ENMs were characterized in diH2O or HEPES biological buffer used in the experimental assays (N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N-2-ethane sulfonic acid, 10 mM, pH 7.4). All measurements were performed with 3 individual samples at concentrations of 10 μg/ml. The primary size and shape were confirmed via transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Hitach H7600). Image J software was used to analyze size distribution. 100 particles per sample were counted by randomly surveying the entire TEM grid from multiple high magnification images. Image J was used to determine both area and Feret diameter (the greatest distance between two points on an objects’ boundary). The total particle number (N/g) and apparent surface area (m2/g) were calculated using the following equations:

graphic file with name srep43570-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep43570-m2.jpg
graphic file with name srep43570-m3.jpg
graphic file with name srep43570-m4.jpg
graphic file with name srep43570-m5.jpg

Equation (1) is used to calculate the total surface area by multiplying total number of particles by apparent surface area (sa) of each individual particle. Equation (2) is used to calculate surface area (sa) of each individual particle by multiplying 4 × π × radius2. Equation (3) is used to calculate total number of particles (N) by multiplying volume of a sphere for each individual particle (v) by the total volume of all particles (V, cm3). Equation (4) is used to calculate volume of a sphere for each individual particle (v) by multiplying Inline graphic × π × radius3. Equation (5) is used to calculate the total volume of all particles (V, cm3) by dividing mass (g) by density of ENMs (ρ, g/cm3).

Cell culture

Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMCs) were cultured from femoral stem cells isolated from C57BL/6 J mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME). Bone marrow stem cells pooled from 2 mice (4 femurs) were cultured at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 4–6 weeks in the presence of IL-3. Mast cell population and maturity prior to experiments were confirmed by the expression on FcεRI and cKIT via flow cytometry (data not shown). Cells were cultured in RPMI media containing 10% FBS, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml primocin (Invivogen, San Diego, CA), 25 mM HEPES, 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, nonessential amino acids (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA), 0.00035% 2-mercapto-ethanol, and 300 ng/ml purified recombinant mouse IL-3 (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). All animal procedures were approved and conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines and approved by the University of Colorado Denver Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All animals were treated humanely and with regard for alleviation of suffering.

Cytotoxicity: Annexin V/ propidium iodide (PI) staining

Cytotoxicity of BMMCs following ENM exposure were evaluated by measuring the expression of early phase apoptotic marker Annexin V & late-phase marker propidium iodide (PI) via flow cytometry following manufacturer’s protocols (antibodies, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). BMMCs seeded at 5 × 104 cells per well were treated with ENMs at concentrations 25 and 50 μg/ml for 1 h and 24 h and evaluated for cytotoxicity. The concentrations were decided based on the evaluation of other ENMs at similar concentrations in the literature as well as performed by the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium58. The values for Annexin V/PI represent percent apoptotic cells positive for the expression of Annexin V and PI (Annexin V+/PI+). Treatment with capsaicin at 100 μM was used as a positive control for early-phase apoptosis (Annexin V) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at 10 mM was used as a positive control for late-phase apoptosis (PI). All experiments were performed in triplicate from 3 individual batches of mature mast cells grown in supplemented media (n = 3/group). Each batch of cells contains femoral bone marrow pooled from 2 mice.

Mast cell degranulation assay

BMMC’s cultured for 4–6 weeks and seeded at 5 × 104 cells per well in HEPES buffer were analyzed for β-hexosaminidase enzyme release following exposure of either ENMs or dinitrophenyl (DNP), as previously described40,59. Briefly, BMMC’s were sensitized overnight with anti-DNP IgE (Sigma- Aldrich, St. Louis MI) and treated with dinitrophenylated human serum albumin (DNP-HSA) (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min (100 ng/ml) to generate a positive control. Separately, non-sensitized BMMCs were exposed to ENMs at 25, 50, or 100 μg/ml concentrations (diluted to concentrations in diH2O) with or without the addition of a bovine serum albumin (BSA) biocorona for 1 h. Following incubation at 37 °C, supernatant and lysed cells were treated with p-nitrophenyl-N-acetyl-β-d-glucopyranoside, a substrate for N-acetyl-β-D-hexosaminidase (β-hexosaminidase), for 90 min and analyzed at 405 nm using an uv/vis spectrometer (BioTeck Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT). β-hexosaminidase release was calculated as percent total cell content after subtracting background release from untreated control groups and ENM-only control groups to ensure there was no interference with the biochemical assay. All experiments were performed in triplicate from 3 individual batches of mature mast cells grown in IL-3 supplemented media (n = 3/group).

Osteopontin measurement

BMMCs seeded at 2 × 105 cells per well were exposed to ENMs at 50 μg/ml for 24 h. Osteopontin (OPN) levels were measured in cell supernatant using a DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) following manufacturer’s protocol. Values are reported as an average of three technical replicates at pg/ml. All experiments were performed in triplicate from 3 individual batches of mature mast cells grown in supplemented media (n = 3/group). Each batch of cells contains femoral bone marrow pooled from 2 mice.

Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)

BMMCs seeded at 2 × 105 were exposed to ENMs at 50 μg/ml for 1 h. Following exposure, samples were collected and centrifuged for 5 min at 1200 rpm, washed two times with PBS to remove excess ENMs, and dissolved in 6 ml of 2% HNO3. Metal concentrations from each ENM treatment were determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, X series II, Thermo Scientific) using an internal standard containing Li, Y, and In with a resolution of 0.1 ppb. All experiments were performed in triplicate from 3 individual batches of mature mast cells grown in supplemented media (n = 3/group). Each batch of cells contains femoral bone marrow pooled from 2 mice.

Statistical analysis

All graphs and analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Data in figures are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical comparisons were performed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), with differences between groups assessed using a Bonferroni post hoc test. Correlation studies were performed using Spearman’s rank-order correlation test (non-parametric). Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Johnson, M. M. et al. Contribution of engineered nanomaterials physicochemical properties to mast cell degranulation. Sci. Rep. 7, 43570; doi: 10.1038/srep43570 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep43570-s1.doc (24.9MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIEHS grant R01 ES019311. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/NIH.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions J.M.B. conceived the experiments. M.J., R.M. and A.J.R. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. R.P. provided intellectual contributions.

References

  1. Salata O. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J Nanobiotechnology 2, 3, doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-2-3 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. De Jong W. H. & Borm P. J. Drug delivery and nanoparticles:applications and hazards. Int J Nanomedicine 3, 133–149 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wiesner M. R., Lowry G. V., Alvarez P., Dionysiou D. & Biswas P. Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 40, 4336–4345 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xu M. et al. Contribution of physicochemical characteristics of nano-oxides to cytotoxicity. Biomaterials 31, 8022–8031, doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.022 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Podila R. & Brown J. M. Toxicity of engineered nanomaterials: a physicochemical perspective. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 27, 50–55, doi: 10.1002/jbt.21442 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chithrani B. D., Ghazani A. A. & Chan W. C. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6, 662–668, doi: 10.1021/nl052396o (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiang W., Kim B. Y., Rutka J. T. & Chan W. C. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol 3, 145–150, doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.30 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mukherjee D. et al. Modeling physicochemical interactions affecting in vitro cellular dosimetry of engineered nanomaterials: application to nanosilver. J Nanopart Res 16, 2616, doi: 10.1007/s11051-014-2616-7 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang X. et al. Use of coated silver nanoparticles to understand the relationship of particle dissolution and bioavailability to cell and lung toxicological potential. Small 10, 385–398, doi: 10.1002/smll.201301597 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen J., Deloid G., Pyrgiotakis G. & Demokritou P. Interactions of engineered nanomaterials in physiological media and implications for in vitro dosimetry. Nanotoxicology 7, 417–431, doi: 10.3109/17435390.2012.666576 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shannahan J. H., Podila R. & Brown J. M. A hyperspectral and toxicological analysis of protein corona impact on silver nanoparticle properties, intracellular modifications, and macrophage activation. Int J Nanomedicine 10, 6509–6521, doi: 10.2147/IJN.S92570 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shannahan J. H. et al. From the Cover: Disease-Induced Disparities in Formation of the Nanoparticle-Biocorona and the Toxicological Consequences. Toxicol Sci 152, 406–416, doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw097 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sperling R. A., Casals E., Comenge J., Bastus N. G. & Puntes V. F. Inorganic engineered nanoparticles and their impact on the immune response. Curr Drug Metab 10, 895–904 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maurer-Jones M. A., Lin Y. S. & Haynes C. L. Functional assessment of metal oxide nanoparticle toxicity in immune cells. ACS Nano 4, 3363–3373, doi: 10.1021/nn9018834 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang X., Reece S. P. & Brown J. M. Immunotoxicological impact of engineered nanomaterial exposure: mechanisms of immune cell modulation. Toxicol Mech Methods 23, 168–177, doi: 10.3109/15376516.2012.757686 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Warrington R. & Silviu-Dan F. Drug allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 7 Suppl 1 S10, doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-7-S1-S10 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Metcalfe D. D., Baram D. & Mekori Y. A. Mast cells. Physiol Rev 77, 1033–1079 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brown J. M., Wilson T. M. & Metcalfe D. D. The mast cell and allergic diseases: role in pathogenesis and implications for therapy. Clin Exp Allergy 38, 4–18, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02886.x (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Murray A. R. et al. Oxidative stress and inflammatory response in dermal toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Toxicology 257, 161–171, doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2008.12.023 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Huang Y. F., Liu H., Xiong X., Chen Y. & Tan W. Nanoparticle-mediated IgE-receptor aggregation and signaling in RBL mast cells. J Am Chem Soc 131, 17328–17334, doi: 10.1021/ja907125t (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Yang W., Lee S., Lee J., Bae Y. & Kim D. Silver nanoparticle-induced degranulation observed with quantitative phase microscopy. J Biomed Opt 15, 045005, doi: 10.1117/1.3470104 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shannahan J. H. & Brown J. M. Engineered nanomaterial exposure and the risk of allergic disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 14, 95–99, doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000031 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Katwa P. et al. A carbon nanotube toxicity paradigm driven by mast cells and the IL-(3)(3)/ST(2) axis. Small 8, 2904–2912, doi: 10.1002/smll.201200873 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen E. Y. et al. A mixture of anatase and rutile TiO(2) nanoparticles induces histamine secretion in mast cells. Part Fibre Toxicol 9, 2, doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-9-2 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ekkapongpisit M. et al. Labeling and exocytosis of secretory compartments in RBL mastocytes by polystyrene and mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Int J Nanomedicine 7, 1829–1840, doi: 10.2147/IJN.S29034 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang X., Shannahan J. H. & Brown J. M. IL-33 modulates chronic airway resistance changes induced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Inhal Toxicol 26, 240–249, doi: 10.3109/08958378.2014.880202 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sabareeswaran A., Ansar E. B., Harikrishna Varma P. R., Mohanan P. V. & Kumary T. V. Effect of surface-modified superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONS) on mast cell infiltration: An acute in vivo study. Nanomedicine, doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.02.018 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Galli S. J., Nakae S. & Tsai M. Mast cells in the development of adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 6, 135–142, doi: 10.1038/ni1158 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tkaczyk C. et al. Activation of human mast cells through the high affinity IgG receptor. Mol Immunol 38, 1289–1293 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McCurdy J. D., Olynych T. J., Maher L. H. & Marshall J. S. Cutting edge: distinct Toll-like receptor 2 activators selectively induce different classes of mediator production from human mast cells. J Immunol 170, 1625–1629 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Woolhiser M. R., Brockow K. & Metcalfe D. D. Activation of human mast cells by aggregated IgG through FcgammaRI: additive effects of C3a. Clin Immunol 110, 172–180, doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2003.11.007 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Brown J. M., Swindle E. J., Kushnir-Sukhov N. M., Holian A. & Metcalfe D. D. Silica-directed mast cell activation is enhanced by scavenger receptors. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 36, 43–52, doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2006-0197OC (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Medic N. et al. Mast cell activation by myelin through scavenger receptor. J Neuroimmunol 200, 27–40, doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.05.019 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Nakamura Y. et al. Staphylococcus delta-toxin induces allergic skin disease by activating mast cells. Nature 503, 397–401, doi: 10.1038/nature12655 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shannahan J. H., Kodavanti U. P. & Brown J. M. Manufactured and airborne nanoparticle cardiopulmonary interactions: a review of mechanisms and the possible contribution of mast cells. Inhal Toxicol 24, 320–339, doi: 10.3109/08958378.2012.668229 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wingard C. J. et al. Mast cells contribute to altered vascular reactivity and ischemia-reperfusion injury following cerium oxide nanoparticle instillation. Nanotoxicology 5, 531–545, doi: 10.3109/17435390.2010.530004 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang Y. et al. Susceptibility of young and adult rats to the oral toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Small 9, 1742–1752, doi: 10.1002/smll.201201185 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ryan J. J. et al. Fullerene nanomaterials inhibit the allergic response. J Immunol 179, 665–672 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Brooks B. et al. Effects of Novel Nanomaterials on Allergic Mediator Release from Human Mast Cells through Non-IgE Mediated Pathways. J Allergy Clin Immun 125, Ab181–Ab181 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  40. Aldossari A. A., Shannahan J. H., Podila R. & Brown J. M. Influence of physicochemical properties of silver nanoparticles on mast cell activation and degranulation. Toxicol In Vitro 29, 195–203, doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.10.008 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Klaine S. J. et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27, 1825–1851 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Petosa A. R., Jaisi D. P., Quevedo I. R., Elimelech M. & Tufenkji N. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 44, 6532–6549, doi: 10.1021/es100598h (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Smith M. J., Brown J. M., Zamboni W. C. & Walker N. J. From immunotoxicity to nanotherapy: the effects of nanomaterials on the immune system. Toxicol Sci 138, 249–255, doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu005 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lu M., Cohen M. H., Rieves D. & Pazdur R. FDA report: Ferumoxytol for intravenous iron therapy in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Hematol 85, 315–319, doi: 10.1002/ajh.21656 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lin J. J., Lin W. C., Dong R. X. & Hsu S. H. The cellular responses and antibacterial activities of silver nanoparticles stabilized by different polymers. Nanotechnology 23, 065102, doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/23/6/065102 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Anyaogu K. C., Fedorov A. V. & Neckers D. C. Synthesis, characterization, and antifouling potential of functionalized copper nanoparticles. Langmuir 24, 4340–4346, doi: 10.1021/la800102f (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Maurer-Jones M. A., Mousavi M. P. S., Chen L. D., Buhlmann P. & Haynes C. L. Characterization of silver ion dissolution from silver nanoparticles using fluorous-phase ion-selective electrodes and assessment of resultant toxicity to Shewanella oneidensis. Chem Sci 4, 2564–2572, doi: 10.1039/c3sc50320h (2013). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Alsaleh N. B., Persaud I. & Brown J. M. Silver Nanoparticle-Directed Mast Cell Degranulation Is Mediated through Calcium and PI3K Signaling Independent of the High Affinity IgE Receptor. PLoS One 11, e0167366, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167366 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Feltis B. N. et al. Characterizing the inhibitory action of zinc oxide nanoparticles on allergic-type mast cell activation. Mol Immunol 66, 139–146, doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.02.021 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim M. H., Seo J. H., Kim H. M. & Jeong H. J. Zinc oxide nanoparticles, a novel candidate for the treatment of allergic inflammatory diseases. Eur J Pharmacol 738, 31–39, doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.05.030 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lappas C. M. The immunomodulatory effects of titanium dioxide and silver nanoparticles. Food Chem Toxicol 85, 78–83, doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.015 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Shima F., Uto T., Akagi T., Baba M. & Akashi M. Size effect of amphiphilic poly(gamma-glutamic acid) nanoparticles on cellular uptake and maturation of dendritic cells in vivo. Acta Biomater 9, 8894–8901, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.06.010 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Toki S. et al. A comprehensive analysis of transfection-assisted delivery of iron oxide nanoparticles to dendritic cells. Nanomedicine 9, 1235–1244, doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2013.05.010 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Roberts L. J. 2nd. Carcinoid syndrome and disorders of systemic mast-cell activation including systemic mastocytosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 17, 415–436 (1988). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Podila R., Vedantam P., Ke P. C., Brown J. M. & Rao A. M. Evidence for Charge-Transfer-Induced Conformational Changes in Carbon Nanostructure-Protein Corona. J Phys Chem C 116, 22098–22103, doi: 10.1021/jp3085028 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mallineni S. S. et al. Biomolecular Interactions and Biological Responses of Emerging Two-Dimensional Materials and Aromatic Amino Acid Complexes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8, 16604–16611, doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b04571 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lee S. et al. ZnO nanoparticles with controlled shapes and sizes prepared using a simple polyol synthesis. Superlattice Microst 43, 330–339, doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2008.01.004 (2008). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Xia T. et al. Interlaboratory evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity and inflammatory responses to engineered nanomaterials: the NIEHS Nano GO Consortium. Environ Health Perspect 121, 683–690, doi: 10.1289/ehp.1306561 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Iwaki S. et al. Btk plays a crucial role in the amplification of Fc epsilonRI-mediated mast cell activation by kit. J Biol Chem 280, 40261–40270, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M506063200 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep43570-s1.doc (24.9MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES