Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Mar 8;7:44076. doi: 10.1038/srep44076

Fabrication of Hierarchical Layer-by-Layer Assembled Diamond-based Core-Shell Nanocomposites as Highly Efficient Dye Absorbents for Wastewater Treatment

Xinna Zhao 1,2,*, Kai Ma 2,*, Tifeng Jiao 1,2,a, Ruirui Xing 2,3, Xilong Ma 1, Jie Hu 2,b, Hao Huang 1, Lexin Zhang 2, Xuehai Yan 3
PMCID: PMC5341016  PMID: 28272452

Abstract

The effective chemical modification and self-assembly of diamond-based hierarchical composite materials are of key importance for a broad range of diamond applications. Herein, we report the preparation of novel core-shell diamond-based nanocomposites for dye adsorption toward wastewater treatment through a layer-by-layer (LbL) assembled strategy. The synthesis of the reported composites began with the carboxyl functionalization of microdiamond by the chemical modification of diamond@graphene oxide composite through the oxidation of diamond@graphite. The carboxyl-terminated microdiamond was then alternatively immersed in the aqueous solution of amine-containing polyethylenimine and carboxyl-containing poly acrylic acid, which led to the formation of adsorption layer on diamond surface. Alternating (self-limiting) immersions in the solutions of the amine-containing and carboxyl-containing polymers were continued until the desired number of shell layers were formed around the microdiamond. The obtained core-shell nanocomposites were successfully synthesized and characterized by morphological and spectral techniques, demonstrating higher surface areas and mesoporous structures for good dye adsorption capacities than nonporous solid diamond particles. The LbL-assembled core-shell nanocomposites thus obtained demonstrated great adsorption capacity by using two model dyes as pollutants for wastewater treatment. Therefore, the present work on LbL-assembled diamond-based composites provides new alternatives for developing diamond hybrids as well as nanomaterials towards wastewater treatment applications.

Nowadays, diamond is well known among scientists and technologists for its excellent mechanical and optical properties, high surface areas and thermal conductivity, special chemical and electrochemical stability, and tunable surface structures1,2,3,4. Research on diamond in terms of preparation, properties, and applications has become one of the hot spots in the field of nanomaterials and carbon materials. In recent years, much effort has been made to the rational design and controlled preparation of various diamond-based organic/inorganic composites, which display better electronic, optical, and electrochemical properties for nanomaterial applications. The chemical modification and functionalization of diamond composite materials with different compounds or nanoparticles are frequently needed to make them appropriate for good dispersion or with suitable function in various applications. For examples, various organic molecules including redox active ferrocene moiety5, long-chain fluorinated polymer6, poly(epsilon-caprolactone) (PCL)7, triethylene glycol (EG) and azide (−N3) groups8, can be used to modify diamond to obtain surface grafted diamond by various chemical reactions. Interestingly, the modification of diamond powder with fluorinated or aminated surfaces as well as special core-shell structures (diamond as core and TiN as shell) were beneficial to the next applications as electrocatalysts9,10. In addition, the diamond surface can be also modified with graphite or graphene to from all-carbon-based composite materials for subsequent functionalization and applications. For examples, Wang et al. synthesized the surface graphitized nanodiamond (GND) with a diamond core covered by a graphitic carbon shell through annealing ND at the temperature of 1300 °C in a vacuum of 10−3 Pa as a support for PtNi electrocatalysts11. Zhao et al. reported the preparation of Pt/TiO2/GND electrocatalysts from graphitized GND and TiO2 modified on Pt nanoparticles using a microwave hydrolysis method12. Wu et al. reported the Co-N-C/ND composite with a nanodiamond (ND) core covered with bifunctional cobalt-embedded nitrogen doped graphitized carbon shell as electrocatalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media13. In addition, diamond/graphene composites have been also prepared by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation or annealing in a vacuum at high temperatures14,15,16. Hence, it represents a formidable challenge to effectively prepare diamond-based composites with organized self-assembled nanostructures.

The layer-by-layer (LbL) self-assembly technique is regarded as a simple and effective surface modification technology. The common driving forces of the layer assembly process are electrostatic interaction, hydrogen bond, coordination bond, π-π stacking, hydrophobic interaction and molecular recognition17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. The LbL assembly technique has many advantages, such as simple process and mild preparation condition. It can be expected that a combination of diamond-based composites involved in diamond modification and LbL self-assembled technique should be particularly advantageous owing to their excellent biocompatibility, moderate nanostructures, and enhanced mechanical and chemical properties. Up to now, various water soluble molecules including poly(allylamine hydrochloride), zinc porphyrin complex, dipeptide (Phe-Lys) conjugated doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX), protein bovine serum albumin (BSA), conductive polymers (polyaniline, polypyrrole, polythiophene and polyazopyridine), poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), have been reported to modify diamond surface via the LbL method for controlled drug release and other analytical applications25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. However, it is still challenging to design and obtain diamond-based composites with facile and effective process in LbL self-assembled technique.

In the work presented here, we reported the synthesis and characterization of functionalized core-shell diamond composites made by LbL assembled strategy via amine-containing polyethylenimine (PEI) and carboxyl-containing poly acrylic acid (PAA). The carboxyl-terminated microdiamonds as building blocks originated from oxidation and chemical modification of initial commercial microdiamond. We investigated the characteristic core-shell structures by using various morphological and spectral characterization methods. The as-prepared mesoporous core-shell composites with the desired number of shell layers display great removal rates for the two model dyes used in this study according to the pseudo-second-order model. This present work suggests that diamond-based composites by LbL method can be promising candidates for dye adsorption and removal, which has great potentials to be applied to the field of wastewater treatment.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1 depicts the 3-step experimental procedure, including the preparation of building block D@GO-COOH, the LbL assembly of the D@GO-COOH with PEI and PAA molecules, and the dye adsorption capacities of the obtained composites D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n. For the first step, to obtain core/shell structural D@G, diamond annealing was carried out in 10−3 Pa vacuum at the temperature of 1500 °C for 15 min to obtain graphite layer on diamond core. The D@GO was subsequently synthesized via the oxidation of graphite layer of D@G by utilizing H2SO4 and HNO3. After that, by reacting with chloroacetic acid, carboxyl groups were modified onto GO surface to obtain D@GO-COOH building block. The prepared D@GO-COOH was then used as a core part to construct hierarchical 3D porous structure with the LBL process via water soluble PEI and PAA molecules. The composites D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n were then obtained with the electronic force and hydrogen bond from -NH3+ and -COO− groups. Two model dyes (i.e., MB and RhB) were then used to evaluate the adsorption capacity of the prepared composites.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the fabrication of D@GO-COOH and LbL-assembled composites by chemical modification and LbL self-assembly.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

SEM images (seen in Fig. 2) show the morphology of initial diamond, intermediate D@Graphite, and D@GO-COOH powders. In order to demonstrate the interfacial layer transition, TEM and HRTEM images were analyzed to characterize the morphology of D@Graphite and D@GO, as shown in Fig. 3. The TEM image of D@Graphite, displayed in Fig. 3b’, clearly demonstrates the interfacial coexistence of diamond crystal face (220) and graphite face (100), as well as the SAED patterns (seen in Fig. 3b”). The D@GO images (Fig. 3c’) present the crystal face of graphene (002), indicating successful modification of GO layer on the hierarchical diamond composite structures15. The elemental analysis data (Table 1) of as-prepared diamond-based composites show the obvious increment of oxygen and hydrogen composition, as well as the decrement of the carbon compositions of D@GO and D@GO-COOH, in comparison with intermediate D@Graphite material. Thus, we inspected the self-assembly process and characterized the prepared LbL-assembled core-shell composites through morphological and spectral methods. For the purpose of monitoring the LbL process, zeta potential (ζ) image in Fig. 4a presents the changes of surface charge with the alternative modification of the PEI and PAA on the surface of D@GO-COOH, which provides carboxyl groups for initial electrostatic interaction in LBL assembly. It can be easily observed that the values of zeta potential show stable state after one PEI/PAA bilayer cycle and vary at range of 5.8~6.7 mV for PEI modification and −18.8~−21.6 mV for PAA modification. With the modification layer increased onto 16 (i. e. 8 bilayer of LBL), big disturbance appeared due to poor dispersion in water solution mainly originated from the crosslinking shell composed of PEI/PAA between building blocks. Thus the obtained composite D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 with lay number of 16 was chosen for the next nanostructural characterization. SEM characterization in Fig. 4b,c display that the structures of the composite D@GO-COOH/(PEI@PAA)8 show a granular arrangement with multilayered shell nanocomposites than the building block D@GO-COOH. TEM image in Fig. 4d confirm the assembled shell structure with jagged edge. In comparison with the AFM images D@GO-COOH (Figure S1), the images in height and 3D modes of composite D@GO-COOH/(PEI@PAA)8 in Fig. 4e,f show the fibrillar or web-like morphology of multilayered shell aggregates on the particle surface.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

SEM images of as-prepared material powders: diamond (a,b), D@Graphite (c,d), and D@GO (e,f).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

TEM images of as-prepared material powders: diamond (a), D@Graphite (b), and D@GO (c); HRTEM images of D@Graphite (b’) and D@GO (c’ and c”). Picture b” show the SAED patterns from picture b’.

Table 1. Elemental analysis data of as-prepared diamond-based materials.

Sample N [wt.%] C [wt.%] H [wt.%] O [wt.%]
D@Graphite — 99.25 0.164 0.466
D@GO — 64.57 1.74 32.77
D@GO-COOH — 65.33 1.97 32.49
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 5.74 54.72 5.53 34.02
Open in a new tab

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Zeta potential data of LbL process; morphological characterization of the as-prepared D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composites: (b and c), SEM images; (d) TEM image; (e and f) AFM images in height and 3D modes.

In addition, XRD was used to characterize the obtained organized nanostructures in the composite materials. Figure S2 shows the XRD curves of the synthesized intermediates and building blocks from initiative diamond. The peak with 2θ value of 43.92° can be corresponding to the (111) cubic diamond plane. The 2θ = 25.92° peak owns to the graphite’s (100) plane. The X-ray pattern of D@GO displays the presence of a strong peak at 11.67° corresponding to the (001) reflection peak with a layer distance of 0.76 nm. This clearly indicates the formation of GO layer on the graphite surface of D@Graphite. After modification with carboxyl groups, the relative intensity of this peak decrease obviously with a little shift to 12.47° in D@GO-COOH. Next, after LBL-assembled process, as shown in Fig. 5a, there appears a wide convex protrusion in the range of 15°–23° for the obtained D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 composite. With the subsequent increment of LBL bilayer number, an acute peak at 18.08° appear in curve of D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composite, which can be assigned to the assembled PEI/PAA multilayer shell structures due to the formation of strong intermolecular hydrogen bonds and electronic forces in the presence of free amino and carboxyl groups in polymeric molecules. The above obtained XRD results clearly indicated that the hierarchical core-shell self-assembled composites have been successfully prepared.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

XRD curves (a) and Raman spectroscopy (b) of the prepared D@GO-COOH and LBL-assembled composites. Pictures c and d show the D/G ratios and 2D/G ratios in Raman data.

It is well known that Raman spectroscopy provides a useful tool to characterize the carbon-based materials34. As shown in Figure S3a and Fig. 5b, three characteristic bands of graphene sheets in Raman spectra appear for the obtained composites, including the G band (1601 cm−1) originated from the first-order scattering of the E2g phonons of the sp2-hybridized carbon atoms, the D band (1351 cm−1) caused by a breathing mode of K-point phonons of A1g symmetry of the defects involved in the sp3-hybridized carbon bonds such as hydroxyl and/or epoxide bonds, and the 2D band (2692 cm−1) which is much sensitive to stacking of graphene sheets35,36. In addition, the D/G ratio of peak intensity can serve as a characteristic factor of the sp2 area size of graphene sheets containing sp3 and sp2 bonds37,38. In comparison with the D/G ratio of about 0.22 for D@Graphite, obvious increment for D@GO and D@GO-COOH with values of 1.0 and 1.03 are easily observed in Figure S3b, indicating fewer defect layers in D@Graphite. And after LBL-assembled process, D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composites demonstrate the increased D/G ratio values of 1.16 and 1.17 (Fig. 5c). Moreover, the 2D/G ratios for graphene sheets with different layers (1, 2, 3, >4) are normally >1.6, 0.8, 0.30, and 0.07, respectively39,40. For example, Akhavan and co-workers have reported single and bilayer GO sheets with 2D/G ratios in the range of 1.53–1.68 and 0.82–0.89, respectively41. For the present study, the 2D/G ratios in all composite materials were calculated to show values ranging from 0.11 to 0.14 (Figure S3c and Fig. 5d), indicating the formation of multilayer GO layer structures in present obtained composite materials.

Since the obtained core-shell diamond-based composites were designed and prepared for the adsorption purpose, it is important to perform interfacial analysis and composition analysis using XPS technique. First of all, the survey data of XPS spectra from D@GO-COOH and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composites (Fig. 6a) demonstrate the characteristic peaks, such as C(1s), O(1s), and N(1s). And the relative elemental analysis data (Table 1) demonstrate the composition appearance of nitrogen element with the value of 5.74 wt.%, indicating the successful modification of PEI molecules in the shell layers via LbL assembly. In addition, the deconvolution of C(1s), O(1s), and N(1s) peaks for the D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composite material were analyzed and demonstrated. For the peak deconvolution of C(1s) core levels in Fig. 6b, the peak centered at 284.8 eV could be assigned to the C-C, C=C and C-H bonds. In addition, the other deconvoluted peaks at positions of 285.6 and 288.7 eV were attributed to C-OH and O=C-O oxygen-containing bonds, respectively42,43. Moreover, the O(1s) peak (Fig. 6c) could be deconvoluted into two main Gaussian component peaks after subtraction treatment of Shirley background. The first component peak centered at 533.6 eV could be assigned to the oxygen of C-O in the composite. The second deconvoluted O(1s) peak centered at 532.4 eV was assigned to the oxygen of C=O in composites. This means that the surface of core-shell composite was still functional and porous, which show an advantage for next adsorption application. Furthermore, the N(1s) peak (Fig. 6d) indicated the appearance of amine group at about 399.3 eV and N+ segments at about 401.3 eV, demonstrating the self-assembly of PEI molecules in composite via both covalent bonding and weak interaction force to the PAA and GO sheets.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Survey XPS spectra of lyophilized composites D@GO-COOH and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 (a); Deconvolution of XPS peaks of the core-shell composite D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8: (b), C(1s); (c), O(1s); (d), N(1s).

The thermograms (TG) of the lyophilized as-synthesized intermediates and LbL-assembled composites are demonstrated in Fig. 7 and Figure S6. It can be clearly observed that the quality of D@Graphite keep invariable from room temperature to 800 °C with the quality reservation of 99.2%. As for the D@GO, with temperature increment, the quality of samples declines sharply in the range from 170 to 230 °C and subsequently decreases slowly until the quality reservation of 59.5%. After functionalization with carboxyl groups, D@GO-COOH as building block shows a little higher thermal stability than D@GO. Next, with the LbL assembled process, the obtained composites D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 display sharp quality-decreased range of 350–490 °C, which can be owing to the pyrolysis of the unstable oxygen containing functional groups and alkyl chains in polymeric molecules44,45,46,47. The final values of quality reservation at 800 °C are 46.3% and 29.1% for the 2-bilayer and 8-bilayer self-assembled composite materials. The above obvious changes of thermal stability demonstrate the successful modification of diamond and the formation of 3D hierarchical core-shell composite structures via LBL-assembled process.

Figure 7. TG curves of D@GO-COOH and LbL-assembled composites.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

The microstructural characteristics of as-prepared composites were further investigated with the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (Fig. 8 and Figure S7). The characteristics of type IV isotherms for composite D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 were demonstrated, and a significant hysteresis loop at high relative pressure could be seen (P/P0 of 0.45–0.95), thereby indicating that the sample was mesoporous material. The hysteresis loops of D@GO-COOH and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 could be presented at higher relative pressure (P/P0 of 0.85–0.95). The pore size distribution curves were calculated by BJH methods, and the properties of the samples were summarized in Table 2 and Table S1. The pore size for D@GO-COOH and LbL-assembled composites were 15–20 nm (Fig. 8b). The 3D hierarchical porous structure of D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 could adsorb more nitrogen and had a relatively high BET specific surface area of 114.5571 m2g−1, which was much larger than that of D@GO-COOH (20.3475 m2g−1). Furthermore, the pore volume and average pore diameter were also larger than that of D@GO-COOH. Higher specific surface areas can increase the number of adsorbent activity points as well as the chance of contact between pollutant molecules and the active point. Larger pore diameters and pore volumes can offer abundant channels for the dye solution and reduce the mass transfer resistance of the reaction process, thereby making it easier for the pollutant molecules to reach the active points, which improves the absorption performance.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distribution (b) of D@GO-COOH and LBL-assembled composites.

Table 2. Physical data of D@GO-COOH and LbL-assembled composites.

Samples Specific surface area (m2g−1) Average pore Diameter (nm) Pore volume (cm3g−1)
D@GO-COOH 20.3475 16.40024 0.068284
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 30.7095 11.79437 0.090550
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 114.5571 65.24655 0.285320
Open in a new tab

In order to evaluate the successful functionalization on diamond and characterize the prepared LBL-assembled composites, FT-IR spectra were also measured. The spectra of D@GO and D@GO-COOH (Figure S8) show typical bands due to skeletal vibrations of graphene domains at 1621 cm−1 and characteristic OH and C=O stretching at 3438 and 1723 cm−1 as well as epoxy C–O (1226 cm−1) and alkoxy C–O (1045 cm−1) groups48,49, which indicate the effective formation of GO layer and functionalization of carboxyl groups. In addition, obvious changes were observed for the IR spectra of prepared LBL-assembled composite D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 with polymeric shell structure. The spectrum show obvious intensity for bands at 3448 cm−1 (NH and COOH stretching), 2921 and 2850 cm−1 (C-H modes of methylene moieties), 1719 cm−1 (C=O stretching), 1627 cm−1 (amide stretching), and 1464 cm−1 (scissoring of methylene chains), indicating the polymeric shell formation with PEI and PAA molecules in the assembled composite materials.

Next, the dye adsorption capacity was evaluated by placing the as-prepared self-assembled diamond-based composites in MB and RhB aqueous solutions. Different absorbance wavelengths (664 nm for MB, and 554 nm for RhB) were utilized to investigate the residual dye concentrations at various time intervals. At the same time, the dye removal rates were calculated according to the equation: K = (A0 − AT)/A0 × 100%, where K is defined as the dye removal rate, A0 is defined as the absorbance of the dye solution, and AT is defined as the absorbance of the supernatant liquid collected at different intervals. Figure 9a,b show dye removal rate versus time plots for the two used dyes RhB and MB. The dye removal rates reach stable values for RhB and MB within approximately 240 min and 80 min, suggesting that the as-prepared composites act as efficient dye adsorbents. Adsorption kinetic experiments of the as-prepared nanocomposites were performed with the results for RhB (Fig. 9c,d) and MB (Fig. 9e,f). In order to compare the adsorption performance of self-assembled composites, the adsorption properties of self-assembling building block D@GO-COOH were also characterized (Figure S9). In addition, classical kinetic models were used to demonstrate the above degradation mechanism as follows:

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

The percent dye removal rate versus time plots and adsorption kinetics curves of as-prepared D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 and D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composites on RhB (a,c,d), and MB (b,e,f) at 298 K.

The pseudo-first-order model can be represented by equation (1):

graphic file with name srep44076-m1.jpg

The pseudo-second-order model can be represented by equation (2):

graphic file with name srep44076-m2.jpg

where qe and qt demonstrate the amount of dye adsorbed (mg/g) at equilibrium and time t, respectively, and the k1 and k2 values are the kinetic rate constants50,51. The kinetic results (Table 3 and Table S2) can be well characterized by pseudo-second-order model with good correlation coefficients (R2 > 0.995). On the other hand, good recovery and stability are expected and preferable for the large-scale applications of composite absorbents. In our recent study, the facile preparation and the dye removal capacity of GO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites and core–shell MnO2 nanocomposites have been characterized and investigated in details, in which the obtained composite materials can be easily reused and recycled several times, suggesting the long term stability and application prospect in water purification52,53. Here, the as-prepared D@GO-COOH and LBL-assembled composite materials were used to investigate the potential application for dye removal. Unlike other reported nanoparticle absorbents, the obtained composite absorbents can be easily separated from wastewater solution. After maximum adsorption process in dye solutions, the as-prepared D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composite were treated by thoroughly cleaning procedures to remove possible dye residues and to regenerate the materials. The adsorption experiments were repeated for eight consecutive cycles using the same composite and fresh MB solution (Fig. 10). The results indicate that the removal rate towards MB maintains at about 81.3% after eight consecutive cycles compared to 96.1% m in the first adsorption process for D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composite, demonstrating an excellent stability and reutilization of the obtained composite materials in this study. In addition, further recycling steps indicated slight decrement of adsorptive efficiency, which could be attributed to the byproduct deposition on composite surfaces or slight loss of composites by many washing steps. The above reused data suggested that the prepared composite materials can be potentially applied for wastewater treatment.

Table 3. Kinetic parameters of the obtained LbL-assembled composites for RhB and MB removal at 298 K (experimental data from Fig. 9).

RhB Pseudo-first-order model Pseudo-second-order model
qe (mg/g) R2 K1 (min−1) qe (mg/g) R2 K2 (g/mg · min)
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 5.4833 0.9771 3.02 × 10−2 6.1120 0.9968 7.38 × 10−3
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 20.8350 0.9577 4.98 × 10−2 23.3263 0.9980 2.96 × 10−3
MB
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)2 38.4633 0.9844 9.54 × 10−2 40.0320 0.9952 3.99 × 10−3
D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 41.3414 0.9981 2.41 × 10−1 43.8596 0.9997 1.20 × 10−2
Open in a new tab

Figure 10. Relative adsorption capacity and regeneration studies of as-prepared D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composite towards MB at room temperature for different consecutive cycles.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

In summary, we have successfully constructed diamond-based core-shell composites D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n from chemically-modified diamond via LbL self-assembly have been designed and developed. Because of the characteristic high surface area and chemical groups in the obtained composites with the hierarchical core-cell structures, the obtained GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n composites showed efficient adsorption capacity towards the two model dyes used in this study. In addition, the as-prepared composite materials can be easily separated from wastewater dye solution and demonstrate excellent reusability. The present work is expected to open a new avenue for the design and preparation of diamond functionalization and self-assembled core-shell composites.

Methods

Microdiamond powders were supplied by Element Six Ltd (Henan, China). Polyethylenimine (abbreviated as PEI, 99% hydrolyzed, average M.W. 600), poly acrylic acid (abbreviated as PAA, M.W. ~450,000), and chloroacetic acid were purchased from Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai, China) and Alfa Aesar Chemicals (Shanghai, China). The ammonia water (NH3 · H2O) and ethanol (C2H5OH) were provided from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Rhodamine B (abbreviated as RhB) and methylene blue (abbreviated as MB) were obtained from Tianjin KaiTong Chemical Reagent co., Ltd (Tianjin, China) and used without further purification. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%), potassium permanganate (KMnO4), potassium nitrate (KNO3), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30%, w/w), and hydrochloric acid (HCl, 37%) were purchased from Beijing Chemicals, and used without further purification. All aqueous solutions were prepared with water purified in a double-stage Millipore Milli-Q Plus purification system.

The diamond powder (10.0 g) with diameter range of 1–2 micron was washed by ammonia water (NH3 · H2O, 25–28 wt.%) for three times under ultrasonic bath, and subsequently filtered the solution using ethanol (95 wt.%). Next, the dried diamond powder was obtained by heating in oven at 80 °C. With the temperature of 1500 °C, the diamond agglomerate was carried out by the vacuum spark plasma sintering (SPS) for 15 minutes. Finally, the synthesized diamond@graphite (abbreviated as D@Graphite) powder (9.2 g) was obtained by grinding the agglomerates.

Diamond@graphene oxide (abbreviated as D@GO) was synthesized from D@Graphite powder as raw material by a modified Hummers method54. In this method, H2SO4 (50 mL) was poured into a beaker and cooled to 0 °C. And D@Graphite powder (1 g) and KNO3 (1.5 g) were added to the cooled H2SO4 with strong mechanical stirring throughout the preparation process. KMnO4 (8 g) was added slowly into the mixed suspension after stirring for 30 min. Then the mixture was reacted at 35 °C for additional 6 h. After that, 200 mL of deionized water was added slowly into the mixture, and then the temperature was kept at 80 °C for 30 min. H2O2 (30%, 20 mL) was used to remove residual KMnO4 after diluting the mixture with 200 mL deionized water. Then the 5 wt% HCl aqueous solution was used to remove the redundant ions in the mixture. For purification, the mixture was washed with deionized water and centrifuged several times. Finally, the designed D@GO material was synthesized under freeze-dried at low temperature (−50 °C).

The carboxyl-functionalized D@GO (named as GO-COOH) was prepared according to the relative reported literature55. The D@GO powder (400 mg) was mixed with 400 mL cooled deionized water in a beaker at 0 °C under mechanical stirring for 30 min throughout the whole preparation process. Then ClCH2COOH (6 g) was added slowly into the mixed suspension during stirring. NaOH solution (6 mol/L, 32 mL) was added to remove residual chemical groups. The mixture was reacted at 70 °C for 3 h. After that, in order to improve the purification, the mixture was washed with deionized water and centrifuged several times. Finally, the carboxyl-terminated microdiamond D@GO-COOH was obtained under freeze-dried in low temperature (−50 °C).

The obtained D@GO-COOH (10 mg) was put into a plastic test tube, and 1 mL aqueous PEI solution (100 mg/mL) was added and kept with magnetic stirring for 1 h. Thus, D@GO-COOH@PEI was obtained by washing 7–8 times using deionized water and centrifugation. After that, 1 mL aqueous PAA solution (75 mg/mL) was poured into the D@GO-COOH@PEI with magnetic stirring for 1 h. After that, D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)1 was obtained by similar washing 7–8 times using deionized water and centrifugation. The Layer-by-layer (LbL) assembly process for D@GO-COOH was achieved by the cyclic operation of the above procedures of PEI and PAA. So the D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n (n = 1~12) composite materials with different bilayers was obtained due to the strong electronic force and hydrogen bonds between functional group of -NH3+ and -COO−. Finally, the composites were carried out under freeze-dried in low temperature (−50 °C).

Adsorption capacity experiments were designed and modified according to previous reports56,57. In adsorption experiments, about 10 mg of D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)n was added to two used dye solutions with volume of 50 mL (MB, 10 mg/L; RhB, 5 mg/L), respectively. The mixed dye solutions were stirred with continuous and uniform rate in dark condition at room temperature. Supernatant liquid was withdrawn at different time intervals for subsequent characterization using an UV-vis spectrometer (752-type, Sunny Hengping scientific instrument Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). Different absorbance wavelengths (662 nm for MB, 554 nm for RhB) were displayed to character the concentration of residual dyes with the pre-established calibration curves, respectively. For the recycling experiments, the as-prepared D@GO-COOH@(PEI/PAA)8 composites (10 mg) were added into 50 mL MB solution (10 mg/L) under mild stirring. After 2 h of maximum adsorption, the composite materials were washed thoroughly with deionized water and ethanol for several times. The adsorption processes were repeated for eight consecutive cycles using the same composites and initial fresh MB solution.

All the present synthesized materials were obtained by lyophilizer at −50 °C temperature via a lyophilizer (FD-1C-50, Beijing Boyikang Experimental Instrument Co., Ltd., China) to completely remove water over 2–3 days. The morphologies were characterized by using a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM) (S-4800II, Hitachi, Japan) with 5–15 kV accelerating voltage as well as a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (HT7700, Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Japan). High resolution TEM pictures and corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns were recorded on a Talos F200X TEM electron microscope (FEI Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, China) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. Atomic force microscope (AFM) data were performed via a Nanoscope model Multimode 8 Scanning Probe Microscope (Veeco Instrument, USA) with silicon cantilever probes. Thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) characterizations were carried out by using a NETZSCH STA 409 PC Luxxsi multaneous thermal analyzer (Netzsch Instruments Manufacturing Co, Ltd, Germany) in argon gas atmosphere. X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on an X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα X-ray radiation source and a Bragg diffraction setup (SMART LAB, Rigaku, Japan). FT-IR spectra were obtained by a Fourier infrared spectroscopy (Thermo Nicolet Corporation) via the KBr tablet method. Raman spectroscopy was measured via a Horiba Jobin Yvon Xplora PLUS confocal Raman microscope equipped with a motorized sample stage. The wavelength of the excitation laser was 532 nm and the laser power was maintained below 1 mW without noticeable sample heating. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was measured on the Thermo Scientific ESCALab 250Xi using 200 W monochromated Al Kα radiation. The 500 μm X-ray spot was used for XPS analysis. The base pressure in the analysis chamber was about 3 × 10−10 mbar. Typically the hydrocarbon C1s line at 284.8 eV from adventitious carbon is used for energy referencing. Both survey scans and individual high-resolution scans for characteristic peaks were recorded. Elemental analysis was carried out with a Flash EA Carlo-Erba-1106 Thermo-Quest. The specific surface areas and pore diameter distribution were determined by the BET measurement (NOVA 4200-P, US). The LBL assembly of D@GO-COOH composites with PEI and PAA was analyzed by measuring zeta potential (ξ) for each step of self-assembly by using Nanozetasizer machine (ZEN 3690, Malvern Instruments, UK).

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhao, X. et al. Fabrication of Hierarchical Layer-by-Layer Assembled Diamond-based Core-Shell Nanocomposites as Highly Efficient Dye Absorbents for Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Rep. 7, 44076; doi: 10.1038/srep44076 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File
srep44076-s1.doc (10.5MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

We greatly acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos 21473153 and 51402253), the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (Nos B2016203172 and E2017203160), the Support Program for the Top Young Talents of Hebei Province, the Post-graduate’s Innovation Fund Project of Yanshan University (No. 2017XJSS052), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2015M580214), and the Open Funding Project of the National Key Laboratory of Biochemical Engineering (No. 2013KF-02).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions The research was planned by T.J. and J.H. Experiments were performed by X.Z., K.M., R.X., X.M. and H.H. T.J. supervised the research. X.Z., K.M., J.H. and T.J. prepared the manuscript. L.Z. and X.Y. contributed with feedback and comments on the manuscript. All authors participated in discussing and reviewing of the manuscript.

References

  1. Mochalin V. N., Shenderova O., Ho D. & Gogotsi Y. The properties and applications of nanodiamonds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 11–23 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Krueger A. & Lang D. Functionality is key: recent progress in the surface modification of nanodiamond. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 890–906 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. Riedrich-Moller J. et al. One- and two-dimensional photonic crystal microcavities in single crystal diamond. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 69–74 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang Q. et al. Nanotwinned diamond with unprecedented hardness and stability. Nature 510, 250–253 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hesari M. & Workentin M. S. Covalent modification of graphene and micro-diamond with redox active substrates via photogenerated carbenes. Carbon 85, 159–167 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Al Mamun M. A., Soutome Y., Kasahara Y., Meng Q., Akasaka S. & Fujimori A. Fabrication of transparent nanohybrids with heat resistance using high-density amorphous formation and uniform dispersion of nanodiamond. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 17792–17801 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ma W. J., Yu X. Y., Qu X. W. & Zhang Q. X. Functionalization of agglomerating nanodiamonds with biodegradable poly(epsilon-caprolactone) through surface-initiated polymerization. Diam. Relat. Mater. 62, 14–21 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  8. Khanal M. et al. Toward multifunctional “clickable” diamond nanoparticles. Langmuir 31, 3926–3933 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao Y. et al. Core-shell structural nanodiamond@TiN supported Pt nanoparticles as a highly efficient and stable electrocatalyst for direct methanol fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 148, 8–14 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y., Huang H., Zang J., Meng F., Dong L. & Su J. Electrochemical behavior of fluorinated and aminated nanodiamond. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7, 6807–6815 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang Y., Zang J., Dong L., Pan H., Yuan Y. & Wang Y. Graphitized nanodiamond supporting PtNi alloy as stable anodic andcathodic electrocatalysts for direct methanol fuel cell. Electrochim. Acta 113, 583–590 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao Y., Wang Y., Zang J., Lu J. & Xu X. A novel support of nano titania modified graphitized nanodiamond for Pt electrocatalyst in direct methanol fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 40, 4540–4547 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu Y., Zang J., Dong L., Zhang Y. & Wang Y. High performance and bifunctional cobalt-embedded nitrogen doped carbon/nanodiamond electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions in alkaline media. J. Power Sources 305, 64–71 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta S., Heintzman E. & Jasinski J. Nanocarbon hybrids of graphene-based materials and ultradispersed diamond: investigating structure and hierarchical defects evolution with electron-beam irradiation. J. Raman Spectrosc. 46, 509–523 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. Zang J. et al. Graphene growth on nanodiamond as a support for a Pt electrocatalyst in methanol electro-oxidation. Carbon 50, 3032–3038 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. Dong L. et al. Nanodiamond/nitrogen-doped graphene (core/shell) as an effective and stable metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Electrochim. Acta 174, 1017–1022 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. Tong W. J., Song X. X. & Gao C. Y. Layer-by-layer assembly of microcapsules and their biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6103–6124 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li Y., Wang X. & Sun J. Q. Layer-by-layer assembly for rapid fabrication of thick polymeric films. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5998–6009 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Borges J. & Mano J. F. Molecular interactions driving the layer-by-layer assembly of multilayers. Chem. Rev. 114, 8883–8942 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ariga K. et al. Layer-by-layer Nanoarchitectonics: Invention, Innovation, and Evolution. Chem. Lett. 43, 36–68 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang R., Xing R., Jiao T., Ma K., Chen C., Ma G. & Yan X. Carrier-free, chemo-photodynamic dual nanodrugs via self-assembly for synergistic antitumor therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 13262–13269 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Xing R. et al. An injectable self-assembling collagen-gold hybrid hydrogel for combinatorial antitumor photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Adv. Mater. 28, 3669–3676 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma K., Xing R., Jiao T., Shen G., Chen C., Li J. & Yan X. Injectable self-assembled dipeptide-based nanocarriers for tumor delivery and effective in vivo photodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 30759–30767 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xing R., Jiao T., Liu Y., Ma K., Zou Q., Ma G. & Yan X. Co-assembly of graphene oxide and albumin/photosensitizer nanohybrids towards enhanced photodynamic therapy. Polymers-Basel 8, 181 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Saini G. et al. Core-shell diamond as a support for solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 82, 4448–4456 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hongthani W. & Fermin D. J. Layer-by-Layer assembly and redox properties of undoped HPHT diamond particles. Diam. Relat. Mater. 19, 680–684 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. Chevallier E., Scorsone E., Girard H. A., Pichot V., Spitzer D. & Bergonzo P. Metalloporphyrin-functionalised diamond nano-particles as sensitive layer for nitroaromatic vapours detection at room-temperature. Sensor Actuat. B-Chem. 151, 191–197 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  28. Wiest L. A. et al. Pellicular particles with spherical carbon cores and porous nanodiamond/polymer shells for reversed-phase HPLC. Anal. Chem. 83, 5488–5501 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang S. S., Shao J. Q., Gao L. F., Qi Y. Z. & Ye L. Adsorption of Cathepsin B-sensitive peptide conjugated DOX on nanodiamonds. Appl. Surf. Sci. 257, 8617–8622 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang H. D., Yang Q. Q., Niu C. H. & Badea I. Protein-modified nanodiamond particles for Layer-by-Layer assembly. Diam. Relat. Mater. 20, 1193–1198 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu W. G., Xie R. G., Bai L. L., Tang Z. M. & Gu Z. Z. Direct electrochemistry of Shewanella Loihica PV-4 on gold nanoparticles-modified Boron-doped diamond electrodes fabricated by layer-by-layer technique. J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. 12, 3903–3908 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hung C. H. et al. Improved efficiency of reversed-phase carbon/nanodiamond/polymer core-shell particles for HPLC using carbonized poly(divinylbenzene) microspheres as the core materials. J. Sep. Sci. 36, 3821–3829 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ashraf R., Kausar A. & Siddiq M. Preparation and properties of multilayered polymer/nanodiamond composites via an in situ technique. J. Polym. Eng. 34, 415–429 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Du X., Guo P., Song H. H. & Chen X. H. Graphene nanosheets as electrode material for electric double-layer capacitors. Electrochim. Acta 55, 4812–4819 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferrari A. C. & Robertson J. Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys. Rev. B 61, 14095–14107 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  36. Malard L. M., Pimenta M. A., Dresselhaus G. & Dresselhaus M. S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 473, 51–87 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim K. S. et al. Large-scale pattern growth of graphene films for stretchable transparent electrodes. Nature 457, 706–710 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kudin K. N., Ozbas B., Schniepp H. C., Prudhomme R. K., Aksay I. A. & Car R. Raman spectra of graphite oxide and functionalized graphene sheets. Nano Lett. 8, 36–41 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Balashov T., Takács A. F., Wulfhekel W. & Kirschner J. Magnon excitation with spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 187201 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Calizo I., Balandin A. A., Bao W., Miao F. & Lau C. N. Temperature dependence of the raman spectra of graphene and graphene multilayers. Nano Lett. 7, 2645–2649 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Akhavan O. Bacteriorhodopsin as a superior substitute for hydrazine in chemical reduction of single-layer graphene oxide sheets. Carbon 81, 158–166 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  42. Akhavan O. & Ghaderi E. Self-accumulated Ag nanoparticles on mesoporous TiO2 thin film with high bactericidal activities. Surf. Coat. Tech. 204, 3676–3683 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  43. Jiao T. et al. Self-assembly reduced graphene oxide nanosheet hydrogel fabrication by anchorage of chitosan/silver and its potential efficient application toward dyes degradation for wastewater treatments. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 3, 3130–3139 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  44. Konwer S., Boruah R. & Dolui S. K. Studies on conducting polypyrrole/graphene oxide composites as supercapacitor electrode. J. Electron Mater. 40, 2248–2255 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  45. Yang W., Yang W., Ding F., Sang L., Ma Z. P. & Shao G. J. Template-free synthesis of ultrathin porous carbon shell with excellent conductivity for high-rate supercapacitors. Carbon 111, 419–427 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  46. Chen Z. H., Ma Z. P., Song J. J., Wang L. X. & Shao G. J. Novel one-step synthesis of wool-ball-like Ni-carbon nanotubes composite cathodes with favorable electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solution. J. Power Sources 324, 86–96 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang C., Shao G., Ma Z., Liu S., Song W. & Song J. Constructing Fe3O4@N-rich carbon core-shell microspheres as anode for lithium ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 130, 679–688 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  48. Bao Q., Zhang D. & Qi P. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticle and graphene oxide nanosheet composites as a bactericidal agent for water disinfection. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 360, 463–470 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Grayfer E. D., Nazarov A. S., Makotchenko V. G., Kim S. J. & Fedorov V. E. Chemically modified graphene sheets by functionalization of highly exfoliated graphite. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 3410–3414 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  50. Guo H., Jiao T., Zhang Q., Guo W., Peng Q. & Yan X. Preparation of graphene oxide-based hydrogels as efficient dye adsorbents for wastewater treatment. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 10, 272 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hou C. et al. Preparation and dye removal capacities of porous silver nanoparticle-containing composite hydrogels via poly(acrylic acid) and silver ions. RSC Adv. 6, 110799–110807 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  52. Jiao T. et al. Reduced graphene oxide-based silver nanoparticle-containing composite hydrogel as highly efficient dye catalysts for wastewater treatment. Sci. Rep.-UK 5, 11873 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang W. et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of hierarchical core–shell manganese oxide nanocomposites as efficient dye adsorbents for wastewater treatment. RSC Adv. 5, 56279–56285 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  54. Li D., Muller M. B., Gilje S., Kaner R. B. & Wallace G. G. Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 101–105 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Jeon S. J., Kwak S. Y., Yim D., Ju J. M. & Kim J. H. Chemically-modulated photoluminescence of graphene oxide for selective detection of neurotransmitter by “turn-on” response. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 10842–10845 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Chen B., Liu M., Zhang L., Huang J., Yao J. & Zhang Z. Polyethylenimine-functionalized graphene oxide as an efficient gene delivery vector. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 7736–7741 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  57. Chandra V. & Kim K. S. Highly selective adsorption of Hg2+ by a polypyrrole–reduced graphene oxide composite. Chem. Commun. 47, 3942–3944 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File
srep44076-s1.doc (10.5MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES