Abstract
Recent studies indicate that the transient receptor potential canonical 6 (TRPC6) channel is highly expressed in several types of cancer cells. However, it remains unclear whether TRPC6 contributes to the malignancy of human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We used a human NSCLC A549 cell line as a model and found that pharmacological blockade or molecular knockdown of TRPC6 channel inhibited A549 cell proliferation by arresting cell cycle at the S-G2M phase and caused a significant portion of cells detached and rounded-up, but did not induce any types of cell death. Western blot and cell cycle analysis show that the detached round cells at the S-G2M phase expressed more TRPC6 than the still attached polygon cells at the G1 phase. Patch-clamp data also show that TRPC whole-cell currents in the detached cells were significantly higher than in the still attached cells. Inhibition of Ca2+-permeable TRPC6 channels significantly reduced intracellular Ca2+ in A549 cells. Interestingly, either blockade or knockdown of TRPC6 strongly reduced the invasion of this NSCLC cell line and decreased the expression of an adherent protein, fibronectin, and a tight junction protein, zonula occluden protein-1 (ZO-1). These data suggest that TRPC6-mediated elevation of intracellular Ca2+ stimulates NSCLC cell proliferation by promoting cell cycle progression and that inhibition of TRPC6 attenuates cell proliferation and invasion. Therefore, further in vivo studies may lead to a consideration of using a specific TRPC6 blocker as a complement to treat NSCLC.
Keywords: anti-cancer drugs, cell cycle, metastasis, intracellular calcium, confocal microscopy
INTRODUCTION
Lung cancer is the most frequent tumor in the world and represents the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) have a rather unpredictable prognosis and account for about 80% of primary lung cancers. Approximately 85% of diagnoses are made when the tumor can no longer be removed surgically, and the median survival for these people is 13 months due to a lack of effective therapies [2]. In most cases, metastasis rather than the primary tumor accounts for the major mortality of these patients. Therefore, efficacious chemotherapeutic regimens to prevent metastasis have become urgent need for the treatment of lung cancers, especially NSCLC. Recent studies suggest that intracellular Ca2+ plays an important role in cancer metastasis [3]. The transient receptor potential (TRP) channel is a superfamily of non-selective, Ca2+-permeable cation channels that is expressed in almost all mammalian cells [4, 5]. The TRP canonical 6 (TRPC6) channel is highly expressed in several types of cancer cells [6–12] including NSCLC cells [13]. Specifically, TRPC6 plays an important role in regulating not only the proliferation of hepatoma cells [14], ovarian cancer cells [12], prostate cancer cells [15], breast cancer cells [16], and NSCLC cells [13], but also the metastasis of glioblastoma [6] and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas [17]. It has also been shown that inhibition of TRPC6 channels causes the cell cycle of oesophageal cancer [8], glioma [7], and renal carcinoma cells [10] arrested at the G2/M phase. However, it remains unclear whether TRPC6 is critical for cell cycle progression and metastasis of lung cancer cells.
The A549 cell line is a good model representing highly metastatic lung adenocarcinoma cells [18]. Therefore, in the present study we used A549 cells to determine the mechanism by which TRPC6 regulates NSCLC cell proliferation and invasiveness. For the first time, we show that the expression of TRPC6 is cell cycle-dependent; we also show that specific inhibition of TRPC6 expression with siRNA against TRPC6 inhibits A549 cell proliferation by causing the cells arrested at the S-G2/M phase and attenuates their ability of invasion possibly by reducing the expression of an adherent molecule, fibronectin, and a tight junction protein, zonula occluden protein-1 (ZO-1). Since A549 is insensitive to gefitinib [19], a drug which is extensively used for treatment of lung cancers, this study may facilitate the search for alternative drugs to complement lung cancer treatment.
RESULTS
SKF-96365 inhibits human NSCLC A549 cell proliferation by blocking TRPC6
To determine whether TRPC6 blockade affects NSCLC cell proliferation, TRPC6 channels in A549 cells were either pharmacologically blocked with 5 μM SKF-96365 or knocked down with TRPC6 siRNA. MTS assays were performed to evaluate cell proliferation (Figure 1A). The data showed that treatment of A549 cells with SKF-96365 or transfection with TRPC6 siRNA resulted in a significant time-dependent reduction in cell proliferation. Transfection with control siRNA did not affect cell proliferation. SKF-96365 does not specifically block TRPC6 [20]. To eliminate the possibility that SKF-96365 inhibits A549 cell proliferation by blocking other types of Ca channels, the cells were co-treated with both SKF-96365 and TRPC6 siRNA. The data showed that co-treatment did not suppress proliferation more significantly than TRPC6 knockdown alone. To determine TRPC6 knockdown efficiency, Western blot experiments were carried out, showing that TRPC6 protein expression was significantly attenuated (Figure 1B) after transfection of TRPC6 siRNA, but not control siRNA. These data suggest that SKF-96365 inhibits A549 cell proliferation by blocking TRPC6.
Inhibition of TRPC6 causes A549 cells arrested at the G2/M phase
Recent studies have shown that in human oesophageal cancer [8] and glioma cells [7], inhibition of TRPC6 induces cell cycle arrested at the G2/M phase. To test whether inhibition of TRPC6 reduces A549 cell proliferation by affecting cell cycle, A549 cells were transfected with a cell cycle probe, Fucci. Both SKF-96365 and TRPC6 siRNA caused cell cycle arrested at the S-G2/M phase (Figure 1C and 1D). As indicated by white arrows in Figure 1C, we noticed that both SKF-96365 and TRPC6 siRNA caused the cells rounded-up and almost detached (see 3-D images). The percentage of cells in the S-G2/M phase was increased from 43% ± 3% (control level) to 74% ± 5% (after SKF-96365; n=4, p<0.001) or increased to 62% ± 4% (after TRPC6 siRNA; n=4, p<0.01), as shown in Figure 1D (green bars). Conversely, the percentage of cells at the G1 phase (red bars) was decreased from 53% ± 3% (control level) to 22% ± 4% (after SKF-96365; n=4, p<0.001) or decreased to 35% ± 4% (after TRPC6 siRNA; n=4, p<0.01). These data suggest that either blockade of TRPC6 activity or specific knockdown of TRPC6 expression attenuates A549 cell proliferation by inhibiting cell cycle progression.
A549 cells at the S-G2/M phase express more functional TRPC6 than those at the G1 phase
To determine whether cell cycle-dependent expression of TRPC6 accounts for the fact that inhibition of TRPC6 caused A549 cells arrested specifically at the S-G2/M phase, but not at the G1 phase, A549 cells were double-labeled with both Fucci and TRPC6 antibody. The data show that TRPC6 levels in A549 cells at the S-G2/M phase were significantly higher than those in the cells at the G1 phase (Figure 2A and 2B). To further demonstrate this cell cycle-dependent expression of TRPC6, we also used the cells after treatment with SKF-96365. The data show that highly expressed TRPC6 at the S-G2/M phase accounts for the fact that SKF-96365 caused a subpopulation of cells, not all the cells, rounded-up and almost detached (Figure 2C–2E). To confirm the cell cycle-dependent expression of TRPC6, Western blot experiments were performed using cell lysates from control A549 cells, SKF-96365-induced detached round cells, and still attached cells after treatment with SKF-96365. The data show that the detached round cells at the S-G2/M phase express more TRPC6 than those still attached cells at the G1 phase (Figure 3A and 3B). To test whether the highly expressed TRPC6 in the round cells is functional, whole-cell patch-clamp experiments were performed. Prior to the experiments, SKF-96365 was washed out to release TRPC6 from the blocked state. Since TRPC6 is directly activated by the membrane-permeable diacylglycerol analog, 1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol (OAG) [21], OAG-sensitive whole-cell currents were used to evaluate TRPC6 activity. The data show that both basal and OAG-sensitive currents in the round cells at the S-G2/M phase were significantly higher than those in the attached cell at the G1 phase (Figure 3C and 3D). These data suggest that cell cycle-dependent expression of TRPC6 accounts for the S-G2/M arrest induced by SKF-96365 in A549 cells.
Inhibition of TRPC6 causes A549 cells detached and rounded-up by reducing intracellular Ca2+
Since TRPC6 is a Ca2+-permeable channel [21], theoretically, TRPC6 should modulate the levels of intracellular Ca2+. Therefore, intracellular Ca2+ was examined with Fluo-3, a Ca2+ probe. The data show that intracellular Ca2+ was significantly reduced in the cells treated with either SKF-96365 or TRPC6 siRNA, particularly in the detached cells (Figure 4A and 4B). To determine whether the reduction of intracellular Ca2+ accounts for the detachment, we artificially reduced intracellular Ca2+ by application of EGTA to the culture medium. We show that EGTA mimicked the effect of SKF-96365 and TRPC6 siRNA (Figure 5A and 5B). The percentage of detached round cells was increased, from low control levels (4% ± 1%) to 40% ± 9% after treatment with SKF-96365 (n=4; p<0.01), to 19% ± 5% after transfection with TRPC6 siRNA (n=4; p<0.01), or to 60% ± 10% after treatment with EGTA (n=4; p<0.001). The detached cells were tested with trypan blue and showed only less 5% cells were dead in each condition. In contrast, treatment with control siRNA did not cause any detachment (3% ± 2%, n=4; p>0.05). To further compare the effects of SKF-96365, TRPC6 siRNA, and EGTA on cell adhesion, the detached cells were collected and replated into new petri dishes containing regular medium. Consistent with the results from trypan blue staining, almost all the detached cells after treatment with SKF-96365 and EGTA became re-attached within a few hours, grew into cell colonies within 24 h and further proliferated with 72 h after the replating. In contrast, the cells treated with TRPC6 siRNA were still detached until at 72 h after the replating, indicating a slow recovery from TRPC6 knockdown (Figure 5C). These data suggest that inhibition of TRPC6 only causes A549 cell detachment, but does not induce any types of cell death.
Inhibition of TRPC6 reduces invasive ability of A549 cells and decreases fibronectin and ZO-1 expression
Recent studies suggest that TRPC6 [6, 9] and intracellular Ca2+ [3] play an important role in tumor metastasis. Therefore, the role of TRPC6 in regulating cell invasion was determined using an established method as reported previously [6]. As depicted in Figure 6A, a reduction of intracellular Ca2+, no matter whether it was caused by blocking TRPC6 with SKF-96365, knocking down TRPC6 with siRNA, or caused by directly chelating Ca2+ by EGTA, significantly attenuated A549 cell invasion. At 24 h after treatment with SKF-96365, TRPC6 siRNA, or EGTA, the number of cells per microscopy field passed through the Transwell membrane was reduced, from 21±4 to 8±3 (SKF-96365; P<0.01), 5±2 (TRPC6 siRNA; P<0.001), or 10±3 (EGTA; P<0.01), respectively (Figure 6B). The reduction in the number of cells should not result from a possible effect on cell proliferation, because neither SKF-96365 nor TRPC6 siRNA affected cell proliferation within 24 h. At 48 h after treatment with SKF-96365, TRPC6 siRNA, or EGTA, the number of cells per microscopy field passed through the Transwell membrane was reduced, from 199±55 to 49±8 (SKF-96365; P<0.001), 27±17 (TRPC6 siRNA; P<0.001), or 95±36 (EGTA; P<0.01), respectively (Figure 6C). Previous studies suggest that fibronectin is an adhesion molecule which is associated with malignant cell invasion [22] whereas ZO-1 is a tight junction protein which is also associated with cancer cell migration and invasion [23]. Therefore, Western blot experiments were performed to determine whether inhibition of TRPC6 affects the expression of fibronectin and ZO-1. The data show that treatment of A549 cells with SKF-96365, TRPC6 siRNA, or EGTA significantly decreased the protein levels of fibronectin and ZO-1. In contrast, control siRNA did not induce any effects (Figure 6D and 6E). Taken together, these data suggest that inhibition of TRPC6 attenuates the invasive ability of A549 cells probably by decreasing fibronectin and ZO-1 expression.
DISCUSSION
The TRP superfamily consists of several subfamilies; most of them are involved in cell proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis [24, 25]. It has been argued that different TRP channels play different roles in prostate cancer, either promoting cell proliferation or inducing apoptosis [26]. However, they all are Ca2+-permeable channels [4, 5] which should modulate the levels of intracellular Ca2+, even though one type of channel could produce opposite effects. For example, enhanced TRPC6 channel activity accounts for malignant cell proliferation [12–16, 27]; conversely, excess activation of TRPC6 induces apoptosis in glomerular podocytes [28, 29]. Therefore, as we argued in our recent publication [27], we suggest that moderate elevation of intracellular Ca2+ should promote cell proliferation whereas severe elevation of intracellular Ca2+ should initiate apoptosis.
In the present study, we show that inhibition of TRPC6 decreases intracellular Ca2+ and attenuates the proliferation of human NSCLC A549 cells by causing cell cycle arrested at the S-G2/M phase. It is not surprising that intracellular Ca2+ provides important regulatory signals during the cell cycle [30]. However, for the first time, we show that TRPC6 modulates intracellular Ca2+ in A549 lung cancer cells and therefore controls cell cycle progression and that TRPC6 is highly expressed in NSCLC cells at the S-G2/M phase rather than at the G1 phase. Although it has long been noticed that the expression of some channels such as Ca2+-activated K+ channels, voltage-dependent K+ channels, and volume-sensitive Cl− channels is cell cycle-dependent [31–33], the mechanism remains largely unknown. Therefore, it should be an interesting topic to investigate why the expression of TRPC6 is cell cycle-dependent and whether such dependence is unique in cancer cells. In other words, enhanced TRPC6 expression may be critical for lung cancer cell cycle progression. However, it remains unknown how TRPC6 expression is elevated in the cells at the S-G2/M phase.
Our data show that inhibition of TRPC6 with its blocker or siRNA caused A549 cell detached, but did not induce any types of cell death, because after replating the detached cells into dishes in the absence of the blocker or siRNA of TRPC6, these detached cells can get attached again and grow back to form a cell monolayer (Figure 5). We have also found that inhibition of TRPC6 activity or expression can reduce the expression of an adherent molecule, fibronectin, and a tight junction protein, ZO-1 (Figure 6D, 6E). Since it is known that TRPC6 is a Ca2+-permeable channel [21] and that intracellular Ca2+ modulates the expression of fibronectin and ZO-1 [34; 35], we argue that intracellular Ca2+ plays an important role in mediating TRPC6-regulated expression of fibronectin and ZO-1. Therefore, inhibition of TRPC6, at least within 24 h, only abolishes the adherent ability of this NSCLC cell line possibly by reducing the expression of fibronectin, and ZO-1. Fibronectin is a glycoprotein in extracellular matrix which promotes lung cancer cell migration and invasion [36; 37]. Together with fibrin, fibronectin can form a provisional wound matrix around the tumor nodules to provide a favorable substrate for cell migration and invasion [38]. Fibronectin may regulate tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis also by interacting with integrins [39]. Not only fibronectin, ZO-1 may also promote cancer cell migration because silencing of ZO-1 can reduce directional mobility [40]. The present study, for the first time, show that inhibition of TRPC6 reduces the invasion of A549 lung cancer cells possibly associated with decreased expression of fibronectin and ZO-1. Therefore, investigation of the role of fibronectin and ZO-1 in mediating TRPC6 regulation of cancer cell invasion may serve as an interesting topic for our future studies.
Since TRPC6 knockout fails to produce any severe phenotype in mice [41], we argue that unlike other TRP channels, TRPC6 appears to be less important for normal cell function. Therefore, activated TRPC6 may be a unique hallmark in malignant cells, and according to the TRPC6 knockout mouse model, targeting of TRPC6 should not affect normal cell function and thus is feasible for treatment of cancers. In conclusion, the present study provides strong evidence at the molecular level for supporting the clinical trials focused on the use of TRPC6 blockers in cancer therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell culture and TRPC6 knockdown
A549, a human lung adenocarcinoma epithelia cell line, was purchased from American Type Culture Collection. A549 cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. Cells were cultured in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C, and the medium was changed every other day. To knockdown TRPC6 expression, A549 cells were transiently transfected with siRNA directed against TRPC6 (80 nM, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat#: SC-42673) according to the protocol provided by the manufacture. Cells transfected with control (scrambled) siRNAs (80 nM, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat#: SC-37007) served as a control. All the experiments using these cells were carried out within 72 h after the transfections. The reduction of TRPC6 expression was confirmed by Western blot experiments. All the experiments in this study were performed at room temperature.
Cell proliferation assays
Cell proliferation was evaluated by performing CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS). MTS assay was carried out according to the manufacturer's instruction. Briefly, A549 cells, either under control conditions or after experimental manipulations (as described in the Results), were transferred into 96 well plates. 10 μl of CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution was added into each well. After the cells were incubated at 37°C for 3 h, the absorbance was detected at 490 nm with the Synergy 4 Microplate Reader (BioTek). Three independent experiments were performed for each experimental condition.
Western blot
Either control A549 cells or treated cells were cultured as described above. Cell lysates (100 μg) were loaded and electrophoresed on 7.5% SDS-PAGE for 60 to 90 min. Gels were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes for 60 min at 90 volts. After 1 hour blocking with 5% nonfat milk-PBST buffer, the PVDF membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody (1:1000 dilution) of rabbit polyclonal antibody to TRPC6 (Alomone Labs, Cat#:ACC-017), rabbit polyclonal antibody to Fibronectin (Sigma, Lot#: F3648), mouse polyclonal antibody to ZO-1 (Invitrogen), or rabbit polyclonal antibody to β-actin (1:2500) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Lot#: D2409). After 3 vigorous washes, the membrane was then incubated for 1 h with either horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:5000 dilution, GE healthcare, Lot#:NA934V) or HRP-linked anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody (1:5000 dilution, BD Transduction Laboratories™). Finally, blots were visualized with chemiluminescence using ECL Plus Western Blotting Detection System (GE healthcare).
Confocal microscopy imaging
Cycle analysis was carried out using the fluorescent ubiquintin-based cell cycle indicator (Fucci®), as described previously [42]. A549 cells were transiently transfected with Premo™ FUCCI Cell Cycle Sensor (Molecular Probes, Cat#: P36237) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. Premo™ FUCCI contains Premo™ geminin-GFP to label cells in G2/M phases shown in green and Premo™ Cdt-RFP to label G1/S phases shown in red. Briefly, after plating A549 cells at a desired density and allow sufficient time for cells to adhere, the Premo™ reagent with the volume 40-80 particles per cell was added to the cells under control or treated conditions (as described in the Results). The cells were returned to the culture incubator overnight. After 16 to 24 hours, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 for in NaCl bath solution 10 min. The cells were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to TRPC6 (Alomone Labs, Cat#:ACC-017) for 1 h, washed twice, incubated with a secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 405-tagged goat anti-rabbit IgG, Molecular Probes, Lot: 1476593) at room temperature for 1 h. To determine intracellular Ca2+, A549 cells were incubated with 5 μM fluo-3 AM, a fluorescent Ca2+ indicator, for 30 min in the incubator. In each set of experiments, each wash was very gentle in order to avoid floating the detached cells, and the images were taken using the same parameter settings. After the cells were labeled with Fucci, confocal microscopy XY scanning was performed within 5-15min and used 405 nm, 488 nm, or 543 nm laser to respectively excite the indicators. The emissions at 463 nm (for TRPC6), 519 nm (for either cells at the S-G2/M phase or intracellular Ca2+), or 603 nm (for cells at the G1 phase) were measured and used for imaging analysis. 3-D images were reconstructed according to the Z stacks.
Patch-clamp technique
The whole-cell recordings were performed as we described previously [43]. Briefly, before electrophysiological analysis, A549 cells on the petri dish were washed with NaCl bath solution (see Solutions) and mounted on the stage of a Nikon inverted microscope. Polished patch pipettes of borosilicate glass typically with about 5 MΩ were used for patch-clamp recording. Patch pipettes were filled with NaCl pipette solution (see Solutions). Only patches with high resistance seals (above 5 GΩ) were used in the experiment to form the whole-cell configuration. Whole-cell currents were recorded using an Axopatch-200B amplifier and pClamp 10 software (Molecular Devices) and low-pass filtered at 2 kHz. A voltage-ramp protocol from −80 to 80 mV was used to quickly get the current-voltage relationship; the protocol was given at an interval of 1 min. All the experiments were performed at 22-23°C.
Invasion assays
Cell invasion assay was performed using 6.4 mm Biocoated Transwell inserts (8 μm pore size, BD, Cat#:354480), according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer, as previously reported [44]. Briefly, the chambers were added warm culture medium to the interior of the inserts and bottom of wells. After 2 h rehydrating in a humidified tissue culture incubator, the medium was carefully removed without disturbing the layer of Matrigel™ Matrix on the membrane. A549 cells were seeded at 50,000 cells per well into Matrigel-coated trans-well chambers. After the cells were attached, experimental manipulations were performed. The non-invading cells were quickly removed from the membrane surface where the cells were plated with cotton tipped swabs. The cells passed through the 8 μm pores on to the other surface of the membrane were fixed with 100% methanol for 15 min and then stained with Eosin for 15 min. The membrane was excised from the insert and mounted on a microscope slide. The images of cells that passed through the membrane were examined under a microscope. The number of cells was counted and averaged per microscopy field.
Solutions
The NaCl bath solution contained (in mM): 145 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, adjusted pH to 7.4 with NaOH. The NaCl pipette solution contained (in mM): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 ATP-Na2, 10 HEPES and 50 nM (1 μM) free Ca2+ (after titration with 2 mM EGTA), adjusted to pH 7.2 with NaOH.
Statistical analysis
Results are shown as means ± SD. Student's t-test was used for comparison between two groups. One-way analysis of variance was applied for comparison among multiple groups. Two-way analysis of variance was applied for comparison among multiple groups with two subgroups. Differences with a P value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by DHHS, National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant (R01-DK100582 to H.-P.M.) and, in part, by NIH/NCI Grants (1R01-CA193828 and 2R01-CA136534 to X.D.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 81400710 to B.-C.L.), National Basic Research Program of China (2015CB931800 to B.-Z.S.), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Projects 81130028 and 31210103913 to B.-Z.S.), and Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging Foundation of College of Heilongjiang Province (to B.-Z.S.)
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Author contributions
Li-Li Yang: performed research, analyzed data, and drafted the manuscript; Bing-Chen Liu: performed research and analyzed data; Xiao-Yu Lu: Analyzed data; Yan Yan: performed research; Yu-Jia Zhai: performed research and analyzed data; Qing Bao: Analyzed data; Paul W. Doetsch: revised the manuscript; Xingming Deng: revised the manuscript; Tiffany L. Thai: revised the manuscript; Abdel A. Alli: revised the manuscript; Douglas C. Eaton: revised the manuscript; Bao-Zhong Shen: designed and supported research, He-Ping Ma: designed research and wrote the manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:533–543. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(01)00486-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegfried JM. Biology, chemoprevention of lung cancer. Chest. 1998;113:40S–45S. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.1_supplement.40s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Calcium in tumour metastasis: new roles for known actors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:609–618. doi: 10.1038/nrc3105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Minke B, Cook B. TRP channel proteins, signal transduction. Physiol Rev. 2002;82:429–472. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00001.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Clapham DE, Runnels LW, Strubing C. The TRP ion channel family. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:387–396. doi: 10.1038/35077544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chigurupati S, Venkataraman R, Barrera D, Naganathan A, Madan M, Paul L, Pattisapu JV, Kyriazis GA, Sugaya K, Bushnev S, Lathia JD, Rich JN, Chan SL. Receptor channel TRPC6 is a key mediator of Notch-driven glioblastoma growth, invasiveness. Cancer Res. 2010;70:418–427. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ding X, He Z, Zhou K, Cheng J, Yao H, Lu D, Cai R, Jin Y, Dong B, Xu Y, Wang Y. Essential role of TRPC6 channels in G2/M phase transition, development of human glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1052–1068. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shi Y, Ding X, He ZH, Zhou KC, Wang Q, Wang YZ. Critical role of TRPC6 channels in G2 phase transition, the development of human oesophageal cancer. Gut. 2009;58:1443–1450. doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.181735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wan Q, Zheng A, Liu X, Chen Y, Han L. Expression of transient receptor potential channel 6 in cervical cancer. Onco Targets Ther. 2012;5:171–176. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S33550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Song J, Wang Y, Li X, Shen Y, Yin M, Guo Y, Diao L, Liu Y, Yue D. Critical role of TRPC6 channels in the development of human renal cell carcinoma. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:5115–5122. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2613-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Guilbert A, Dhennin-Duthille I, Hiani YE, Haren N, Khorsi H, Sevestre H, Ahidouch A, Ouadid-Ahidouch H. Expression of TRPC6 channels in human epithelial breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2008;8:125. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeng B, Yuan C, Yang X, Atkin SL, Xu SZ. TRPC channels, their splice variants are essential for promoting human ovarian cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13:103–116. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jiang HN, Zeng B, Zhang Y, Daskoulidou N, Fan H, Qu JM, Xu SZ. Involvement of TRPC channels in lung cancer cell differentiation, the correlation analysis in human non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e67637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.El BC, Bidaux G, Enfissi A, Delcourt P, Prevarskaya N, Capiod T. Capacitative calcium entry, transient receptor potential canonical 6 expression control human hepatoma cell proliferation. Hepatology. 2008;47:2068–2077. doi: 10.1002/hep.22263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang Y, Yue D, Li K, Liu YL, Ren CS, Wang P. The role of TRPC6 in HGF-induced cell proliferation of human prostate cancer DU145, PC3, cells. Asian J Androl. 2010;12:841–852. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aydar E, Yeo S, Djamgoz M, Palmer C. Abnormal expression, localization, interaction of canonical transient receptor potential ion channels in human breast cancer cell lines and tissues: a potential target for breast cancer diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2009;9:23. doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-9-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bernaldo de QS, Merlo A, Secades P, Zambrano I, de Santa Maria IS, Ugidos N, Jantus-Lewintre E, Sirera R, Suarez C, Chiara MD. Identification of TRPC6 as a possible candidate target gene within an amplicon at 11q21-q22. 2 for migratory capacity in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hirai K, Shimada H, Ogawa T, Taji S. The spread of human lung cancer cells on collagens, its inhibition by type III collagen. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1991;9:517–527. doi: 10.1007/BF01768580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Janmaat ML, Kruyt FA, Rodriguez JA, Giaccone G. Response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer cells: limited antiproliferative effects, absence of apoptosis associated with persistent activity of extracellular signal-regulated kinase or Akt kinase pathways. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2316–2326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Singh A, Hildebrand ME, Garcia E, Snutch TP. The transient receptor potential channel antagonist SKF96365 is a potent blocker of low-voltage-activated T-type calcium channels. Br J Pharmacol. 2010;160:1464–1475. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00786.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hofmann T, Obukhov AG, Schaefer M, Harteneck C, Gudermann T, Schultz G. Direct activation of human TRPC6, TRPC3 channels by diacylglycerol. Nature. 1999;397:259–263. doi: 10.1038/16711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jia D, Yan M, Wang X, Hao X, Liang L, Liu L, Kong H, He X, Li J, Yao M. Development of a highly metastatic model that reveals a crucial role of fibronectin in lung cancer cell migration, invasion. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:364. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smalley KS, Brafford P, Haass NK, Brandner JM, Brown E, Herlyn M. Up-regulated expression of zonula occludens protein-1 in human melanoma associates with N-cadherin, contributes to invasion and adhesion. Am J Pathol. 2005;166:1541–1554. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62370-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gkika D, Prevarskaya N. Molecular mechanisms of TRP regulation in tumor growth, metastasis. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:953–958. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Prevarskaya N, Zhang L, Barritt G. TRP channels in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1772:937–946. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gkika D, Prevarskaya N. TRP channels in prostate cancer: the good, the bad and the ugly? Asian J Androl. 2011;13:673–676. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song X, Liu BC, Lu XY, Yang LL, Zhai YJ, Eaton AF, Thai TL, Eaton DC, Ma HP, Shen BZ. Lovastatin inhibits human B lymphoma cell proliferation by reducing intracellular ROS, TRPC6 expression. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1843:894–901. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang H, Zhao B, Liao C, Zhang R, Meng K, Xu J, Jiao J. High glucose-induced apoptosis in cultured podocytes involves TRPC6-dependent calcium entry via the RhoA/ROCK pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;434:394–400. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Liu BC, Song X, Lu XY, Li DT, Eaton DC, Shen BZ, Li XQ, Ma HP. High glucose induces podocyte apoptosis by stimulating TRPC6 via elevation of reactive oxygen species. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1833:1434–1442. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.02.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Berridge MJ. Calcium signalling, cell proliferation. Bioessays. 1995;17:491–500. doi: 10.1002/bies.950170605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Villalonga N, Martinez-Marmol R, Roura-Ferrer M, David M, Valenzuela C, Soler C, Felipe A. Cell cycle-dependent expression of Kv1.5 is involved in myoblast proliferation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:728–736. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morimoto T, Ohya S, Hayashi H, Onozaki K, Imaizumi Y. Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of Ca2+-activated K+ channel in Jurkat T-lymphocyte. J Pharmacol Sci. 2007;104:94–98. doi: 10.1254/jphs.sc0070032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen L, Wang L, Zhu L, Nie S, Zhang J, Zhong P, Cai B, Luo H, Jacob TJ. Cell cycle-dependent expression of volume-activated chloride currents in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2002;283:C1313–C1323. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00182.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mukherjee S, Kolb MR, Duan F, Janssen LJ. Transforming growth factor-beta evokes Ca2+ waves, enhances gene expression in human pulmonary fibroblasts. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;46:757–764. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2011-0223OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ko JA, Yanai R, Nishida T. Up-regulation of ZO-1 expression, barrier function in cultured human corneal epithelial cells by substance P. FEBS Lett. 2009;583:2148–2153. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meng XN, Jin Y, Yu Y, Bai J, Liu GY, Zhu J, Zhao YZ, Wang Z, Chen F, Lee KY, Fu SB. Characterisation of fibronectin-mediated FAK signalling pathways in lung cancer cell migration, invasion. Br J Cancer. 2009;101:327–334. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Han S, Ritzenthaler JD, Sitaraman SV, Roman J. Fibronectin increases matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression through activation of c-Fos via extracellular-regulated kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways in human lung carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:29614–29624. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604013200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gailit J, Clark RA. Wound repair in the context of extracellular matrix. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1994;6:717–725. doi: 10.1016/0955-0674(94)90099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Akiyama SK, Olden K, Yamada KM. Fibronectin, integrins in invasion and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1995;14:173–189. doi: 10.1007/BF00690290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tuomi S, Mai A, Nevo J, Laine JO, Vilkki V, Ohman TJ, Gahmberg CG, Parker PJ, Ivaska J. PKCepsilon regulation of an alpha5 integrin-ZO-1 complex controls lamellae formation in migrating cancer cells. Sci Signal. 2009;2:ra32. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Freichel M, Vennekens R, Olausson J, Hoffmann M, Muller C, Stolz S, Scheunemann J, Weissgerber P, Flockerzi V. Functional role of TRPC proteins in vivo: lessons from TRPC-deficient mouse models. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;322:1352–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sakaue-Sawano A, Kurokawa H, Morimura T, Hanyu A, Hama H, Osawa H, Kashiwagi S, Fukami K, Miyata T, Miyoshi H, Imamura T, Ogawa M, Masai H, Miyawaki A. Visualizing spatiotemporal dynamics of multicellular cell-cycle progression. Cell. 2008;132:487–498. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Wang LH, Wang N, Lu XY, Liu BC, Yanda MK, Song JZ, Dai HM, Sun YL, Bao HF, Eaton DC, Ma HP. Rituximab inhibits Kv1.3 channels in human B lymphoma cells via activation of FcgammaRIIB receptors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823:505–513. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Baumann P, Cremers N, Kroese F, Orend G, Chiquet-Ehrismann R, Uede T, Yagita H, Sleeman JP. CD24 expression causes the acquisition of multiple cellular properties associated with tumor growth, metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10783–10793. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]