Abstract
The oncogenic transcription factor Myc is required for the progression and maintenance of diverse tumors. This has led to the concept that Myc itself, Myc-activated gene products, or associated biological processes might constitute prime targets for cancer therapy. Here, we present an in vivo reverse-genetic screen targeting a set of 241 Myc-activated mRNAs in mouse B-cell lymphomas, unraveling a critical role for the mitochondrial ribosomal protein (MRP) Ptcd3 in tumor maintenance. Other MRP-coding genes were also up regulated in Myc-induced lymphoma, pointing to a coordinate activation of the mitochondrial translation machinery. Inhibition of mitochondrial translation with the antibiotic Tigecycline was synthetic-lethal with Myc activation, impaired respiratory activity and tumor cell survival in vitro, and significantly extended lifespan in lymphoma-bearing mice. We have thus identified a novel Myc-induced metabolic dependency that can be targeted by common antibiotics, opening new therapeutic perspectives in Myc-overexpressing tumors.
Keywords: lymphoma, mitochondria, mitochondrial translation, Myc, Tigecycline
INTRODUCTION
Tumors driven by deregulated c-myc generally show oncogene addiction, being sensitive to suppression or inhibition of the c-Myc protein (hereby, Myc) [1, 2]. Myc is also required in tumors driven by other oncogenic events, such as the activation of Wnt or Ras signaling [3, 4], and is generally activated by these signaling pathways, supporting a general requirement for Myc activity in cancer [5, 6]. Myc is a bHLH-LZ family transcription factor that requires dimerization with the partner protein Max in order to bind DNA and regulate gene expression [5]. When over-expressed, Myc activates and represses large sets of target genes, among which must lie the critical effectors of its oncogenic activity [6-9]. Recently, RNAi-based screens have been employed to identify genes that show synthetic lethality with Myc activation or are required for the progression of Myc-driven tumors [10-14]. However, only a handful of established Myc-target genes were involved so far [12, 15-19]. In particular, no screen systematically addressed the functional requirement of Myc-regulated genes in a given tumor type.
Here, we developed a reverse-genetic shRNA screen aimed at identifying Myc-activated genes required for tumor maintenance. A retroviral shRNA library was designed against 241 Myc-induced mRNAs identified in previous work [8 and unpublished data], and was transduced in murine Eμ-myc lymphomas. Following expansion of the lymphomas in recipient animals, genomic DNA was analyzed to identify depleted (or “dropout”) shRNAs imparting a selective disadvantage to tumor cells. One of the genes identified in this manner was Ptcd3, which encodes a pentatricopeptide repeat protein incorporated in the small subunit of the mitochondrial ribosome, and is required for efficient translation of mitochondrial mRNAs [20, 21]. Knockdown of Ptcd3 or other mitochondrial ribosomal proteins (Mrps5 or Mrps27) decreased both expression of mitochondrion-encoded proteins and respiration rates, and was detrimental to Myc-driven lymphomas. Chemical inhibition of mitochondrial translation with the antibiotic Tigecycline showed similar effects in vitro and led to rapid tumor clearance in vivo, significantly extending the survival of lymphoma-bearing mice. Further analysis in non-transformed mouse B-cells and mammary epithelial cells showed that Tigecycline was not generically toxic to all proliferating cells, but selectively killed cells with supra-physiological Myc levels. Altogether, we conclude that the mitochondrial translation machinery is an important effector of Myc in lymphomagenesis and that Myc overexpression is a primary determinant of Tigecycline toxicity. Our data unmask a genetic basis for the elusive anti-tumoral activity of antibiotics [22-24], providing a rationale for their repurposing against Myc-associated tumors.
RESULTS
A reverse-genetic screen reveals a critical role for Ptcd3 in lymphoma maintenance
We previously mapped Myc-regulated genes during B-cell lymphomagenesis in Eμ-myc transgenic mice [8]. Here, we devised a reverse-genetic screen to identify Myc-activated genes that are critical for tumor maintenance (Figure 1A). Analogous to a previous study [10], we constructed a retroviral shRNA library targeting a subset of 241 Myc-induced genes, each mRNA being targeted with 5 different shRNAs (Supplementary Table S1). The library was transduced in quadruplicate into Eμ-myc lymphoma cells at low multiplicity of infection to ensure single-copy integration of shRNA constructs in each targeted cell, and each infected population was transplanted into syngeneic recipient mice. After 21 days, the mice were sacrificed and lymphomas collected for DNA extraction. Changes in shRNA representation were assessed by deep sequencing of shRNA guide strands amplified from genomic DNA before and after in vivo expansion (Supplementary Table S2). Consistent with previous observations, we observed a general loss of complexity in shRNA distribution following tumor development in vivo (Figure 1B) [10, 25]. Nevertheless, control shRNAs targeting essential genes (Rpa1, Rpa3 and Polr2b; [26]) were consistently depleted in all four replicates, as were shRNAs targeting genes that either cooperated with Myc (Prmt5 and Odc) [15, 16] or belonged to known oncogenic pathways in Eμ-myc lymphomas (Adsl and Rsl24d1) [18, 19] (Supplementary Table S2). To ensure high-stringency selection criteria, we followed-up only on genes targeted by two or more depleted shRNAs, with at least one shRNA depleted > 5 fold in all four replicates. 41 genes were thus selected for further validation in a secondary in vitro competition screen (Figure 1A; Supplementary Table S3), in which we individually tested 2-4 shRNAs per gene: from a total of 105 shRNAs, 78 (74%) conferred competitive disadvantage of infected (GFP+) relative to non-infected (GFP−) lymphoma cells, validating their initial dropout in vivo (Supplementary Table S4; Figure 1C). 27 genes were validated in this manner, with at least two independent shRNAs conferring negative selection in the secondary screen (Supplementary Table S5). Here, we focus on Ptcd3, for which 4 independent shRNAs validated in the secondary screen (Figure 1C, blue dots).
Ptcd3 and other mitochondrial ribosomal proteins are rate-limiting for lymphoma cell proliferation in vitro
Pctd3 encodes a pentatricopeptide protein that is incorporated in the 28S subunit of the mitochondrial ribosome and is required for mitochondrial translation [20]. Other genes regulating this process, in particular those encoding Mitochochondrial Ribosomal Proteins (MRPs), were coordinately induced during tumor progression in the Eμ-myc model (Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Table S6) [8] pointing to a possible role of the mitochondrial translation machinery for the fitness of Eμ-myc lymphoma cells. Consistent with this hypothesis, shRNAs targeting either Ptcd3, Mrps5 or Mrps27 (all encoding components of the 28S subunit) impaired proliferation of lymphoma cells (Figure 2A, 2B), delayed progression through all phases of the cell cycle (Supplementary Figure S2A for Ptcd3) and caused a slight increase in the number of apoptotic cells, as determined by Annexin-V staining (Figure 2C).
As expected, knockdown of either Ptcd3, Mrps5 or Mrps27 decreased the levels of COX1 (Figure 2D), a mitochondrion-encoded subunit of the electron transport chain (ETC) Complex IV. The nucleus-encoded proteins NDUFB8, UQCRC2 and COXIV belonging to ETC Complexes I, III and IV, respectively, were also down-regulated, consistent with the destabilization of the whole complexes [27, 28]. Complex II instead contains no mitochondrion-encoded component [29] and its subunit SDHA was unaffected by knockdown of either MRP. In addition, the levels of the outer membrane protein VDAC (Voltage Dependent Anion Channel; Figure 2D) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA; Figure 2E) were unchanged, indicating MRP knockdown caused no reduction in global mitochondrial mass.
MRP knockdown also reduced the levels of most of the 13 mitochondrion-encoded RNAs (mtRNAs, Supplementary Figure S2B), indicative of altered mtRNA synthesis and/or turnover [30]. Finally, MRP knockdown led to reduced oxygen consumption rates (OCR) and mitochondrial membrane potential (Figure 2F, 2G). In conclusion, mitochondrial translation is critical for sustained respiratory activity, as well as for the growth and survival of Eμ-myc lymphoma cells.
Pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial translation phenocopies MRP knockdown
Mitochondrial ribosomes are structurally related to bacterial ribosomes and are inhibited by various classes of antibiotics [31-35]. Long-standing observations suggest that cancer cells have augmented sensitivity to these antibiotics [22-24, 36, 37] but the genetic basis for this phenomenon has remained unclear. We thus compared the sensitivity of Eμ-myc lymphoma cells to different antibiotics targeting the mitochondrial ribosome, including Tigecycline, Linezolid and Chloramphenicol [23, 34, 38], revealing a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation and viability (Figure 3A). Most importantly, the different anti-proliferative potencies of these antibiotics correlated with their ability to reduce basal mitochondrial respiratory capacity (Figure 3B, black bars) and to prevent increased oxygen consumption by the ETC following uncoupling with 2,4 Dinitrophenol (DNP; grey bars), as expected following inhibition of mitochondrial translation. The strongest effect was observed with Tigecycline, a tetracycline derivative that has also shown effectiveness on cancer cell lines and in pre-clinical models of AML [23, 36, 37].
The dose-dependent effect of Tigecycline was confirmed in the same Eμ-myc line (LY27), which is wild type for p53, as well as in an independent p53-null line (LY35) (Supplementary Figure S3A). As seen upon MRP knockdown, Tigecycline treatment suppressed COX1, COXIV and NDUFB8 protein levels, while UQCRC2 and SDHA remained unchanged, VDAC levels were slightly increased and mtDNA abundance remained unaltered (Figure 3C and Supplementary Figure S3B, S3C). The levels of several mtRNAs increased with Tigecycline (AtpP6, CytB, Nd2, Nd3; Supplementary Figure S3D), as expected following inhibition of the mitochondrial ribosome [23, 39]. This contrasted with the drop in mtRNA levels seen with MRP knockdown (Supplementary Figure S2B), owing presumably to the disassembly of the small ribosomal subunit - and possibly mtRNA destabilization - only in the latter. Tigecycline also caused depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane and a dose-dependent increase in caspase 3/7 activity (Figure 3D, 3E). Of note, Tigecycline concentrations that already induced cell death (5μM) and reduced respiratory activity (Supplementary Figure S3A; Figure 3C, 3D) did not cause significant decreases in ATP levels (Supplementary Figure S3E), consistent with ATP production through glycolysis (see Discussion). Finally, electron-microscopic analysis revealed alterations in mitochondrial morphology already at the sub-lethal concentration of 1μM, and more markedly at 2.5 μM, with a decrease in the number and length of inner membrane cristae, and occasional perforation of the external membrane (Supplementary Figure S3F).
To confirm that cellular effects of Tigecyline were a consequence of blocking mitochondrial gene expression, we treated Eμ-myc lymphoma cells with 2′-C-Methyladenosine (2′CmeA), an inhibitor of the mitochondrial RNA polymerase [40]. The mtRNAs encoding Mt-CoxIII, Atp6 and Nd1 were diminished already after 6 hours of treatment, while CoxIV mRNA and mtDNA levels remained stable, confirming the selective inhibition of mitochondrial transcription (Supplementary Figure S4A, S4B). As with Tigecycline, increasing doses of 2′CmeA led to decreased growth and viability (Supplementary Figure S4C), and increases in caspase 3/7 activity (Supplementary Figure S4D). These data confirm that mitochondrial-encoded products are critical for the survival of Eμ-myc lymphoma cells.
Tigecycline sensitivity correlates with Myc activation but not with cellular proliferation
The data presented so far showed that MRP-coding genes are up-regulated during Myc-induced lymphomagenesis and that mitochondrial translation is critical for the fitness of these lymphomas. A main open question at this stage was whether the Tigecycline sensitivity of lymphoma cells is a selective effect of Myc, or merely an indirect consequence of its proliferative activity. To address this question, we initially used the non-transformed B-cell line Ba/F3 [41]. Relative to Eμ-myc lymphomas, Ba/F3 cells showed similar proliferation rates (Figure 4A), much lower Myc levels (albeit slightly higher than those of control mouse B-cells: Figure 4B) and significantly lower sensitivity to Tigecycline (Figure 4C). Hence, Tigecycline toxicity correlated with Myc activation in lymphomas, but wasn't a simple consequence of enhanced proliferation.
It is noteworthy here that a previous experiment in the human B-cell line P493-6 was interpreted as a demonstration of Myc-induced sensitivity to Tigecycline, at concentrations of 2.5 μM or higher [23]. However, P493-6 cells are dependent on a Tetracycline-regulated c-myc transgene [42]: as predictable based on the structural relatedness of Tetracycline and Tigecycline, and on their ability to regulate tet-dependent reporters [43], as little as 100 nM of either antibiotic was sufficient to ablate Myc expression and suppress proliferation in those cells (Supplementary Figure S5A, S5B). Thus, P493-6 cells cannot be used to address the role of Myc in Tigecycline sensitivity.
In order to directly address the effect of Myc activation, we used immortalized primary mouse mammary epithelial cells (MMECs) derived from the mammary glands of 6-8 weeks old R26-MERT2 mice [44] that constitutively express the 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (OHT)-activatable MycERTAM fusion protein [45]. The Mrps5, Mrps27 and Ptcd3 mRNAs were up-regulated following OHT stimulation (Figure 5A). These mRNAs were targeted concomitantly by infecting R26-MERT2 MMECs with a pool of retroviral shRNA vectors (shMRP-mix: 2 per gene), achieving ~60-70% reduction of each mRNA (Figure 5B). Neither shMRP-mix, nor OHT alone affected R26-MERT2 cultures, but the two treatments together resulted in a marked decrease in cell proliferation (Figure 5C). In a similar manner, OHT treatment sensitized R26-MERT2 MMECs to increasing doses of Tigecycline (Figure 5D), with a strong cooperative effect in the induction of apoptosis (Figure 5E). As seen in the Eμ-myc model, Tigecycline treatment caused down-regulation of both mitochondrion- (COX1) and nucleus-encoded ETC subunits (UQCRC2 and NDUFB8) while SDHA was not significantly altered (Figure 5F) and mtDNA slightly increased (Figure 5G). Most importantly, R26-MERT2 MMECs showed similar proliferation rates in the presence or absence of OHT (Figure 5C). Hence, MycERTAM activation sensitized cells to either MRP knockdown or Tigecycline, an effect that could not simply be accounted for by the proliferative status of the cells.
The above data indicate that Myc activation augments the dependency of cells upon mitochondrial translation. On this basis, one might predict a similar effect on mitochondrial transcription. Indeed, OHT treatment also sensitized R26-MERT2 MMEC cells to 2′CmeA (Supplementary Figure S6A, S6B). As expected, mtRNAs were depleted upon 2′CmeA treatment regardless of OHT, while mtDNA was not and expression of the nucleus-encoded Cox-IV mRNA was unchanged (Supplementary Figure S6C, S6D). Thus, as also demonstrated by Oran et al. in the accompanying paper [46], Myc activation sensitized cells to inhibition of mitochondrial transcription.
Taken together, Myc enhances the cell's dependency upon mitochondrial biosynthetic activity, whether at the transcriptional or translational level.
Tigecycline reduces tumor burden and significantly extends survival of lymphoma-bearing mice
To address the significance of our findings in a pre-clinical setting, we tested whether Tigecycline was effective in the treatment of Eμ-myc lymphomas in vivo. Consistent with previous observations [23], we did not observe any macroscopic sign of toxicity or weight loss upon bi-daily intraperitoneal injection of 100mg/kg Tigecycline for 2 weeks (Supplementary Figure S7A). Histological staining of spleen, liver, kidney and heart showed no evident abnormalities in treated animals, relative to untreated controls (Supplementary Figure S7B). Cell counts in either peripheral blood or spleen revealed modest changes - all below statistical significance - in the numbers of circulating white blood cells (WBC), platelets, or B-cells (Supplementary Figure S7C, S7D). We thus maintained the same treatment protocol in further experiments.
Eμ-myc lymphomas can be readily transplanted into syngeneic recipient mice and give rise to aggressive, disseminated tumors within 2-3 weeks. We thus injected 5*105 tumor cells derived from primary lymphomas into the tail-vein of C57BL/6J mice and started Tigecycline treatment after 14 days, when tumors were palpable. Independently from the p53 status of the tumor, Tigecycline significantly extended survival of the recipient animals (Figure 6A). By day three, treated mice showed no signs of disease, were as active as control healthy mice (data not shown), and showed reduced lymph-node infiltration, normalized circulating WBC counts and spleen weight (Figure 6B, 6C). The latter parameters were significantly normalized already 24 hours after a single injection of Tigecycline (1X, Figure 6C), associated with disappearance of Ki-67 and induction of cleaved caspase 3 (CC3) staining in lymph-nodes (Figure 6D), indicating a fast transition from a proliferative to an apoptotic state. Following cessation of the treatment, mice eventually succumbed from lymphoma, indicating that Tigecycline alone was insufficient for full disease eradication.
Tigecycline treatment impairs the growth of Burkitt's Lymphoma xenografts
Based on the above data, we hypothesized that human Burkitt's Lymphoma (BL) might be sensitive to inhibition of mitochondrial translation. Indeed, the growth of four different BL cell lines was suppressed by Tigecycline with IC50 values ranging from 8.6 to 44 μM (Figure 7A). We then xenografted the least sensitive BL cell line (Raji), let tumors develop and treated the animals with Tigecycline for 14 days, revealing a significant delay - in some cases even a full arrest - in tumor growth relative to vehicle-treated tumors (Figure 7B). Tigecycline-treated tumors were smaller in size, had a fibrotic appearance and lost Ki-67 expression (Figure 7C, 7D). Thus, as Eμ-myc lymphomas, BL-derived lymphomas showed a response to Tigecycline in recipient mice.
DISCUSSION
Thorough mapping of the transcriptional programs regulated by Myc in diverse tumor types will be key to our understanding of its oncogenic activity [6, 7]. However, if we are to discriminate between incidental and critical regulatory events, profiling studies will need to be complemented with functional screens in the relevant tumor models. We previously profiled Myc-regulated transcription during lymphoma progression in Eμ-myc transgenic mice and following MycER activation in proliferating fibroblasts [8]. Here, we selected 241 genes induced in both model systems and subjected these to a reverse-genetic screen in lymphomas, uncovering 27 genes whose knockdown imparts a selective disadvantage to tumor cells in vivo. Among these was Ptcd3, which encodes a Mitochondrial Ribosomal Protein (MRP) [20]. Further analysis revealed that most of the nuclear genes linked to the mitochondrial translation apparatus, and in particular other MRP-coding genes, were activated in a concerted manner in lymphomagenesis, extending previous reports on the regulation of these genes by Myc [47]. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial translation - the latter with the Tetracycline-related antibiotic Tigecycline - was detrimental to lymphoma cells in vitro. Further analysis in non-transformed mouse B-cells and mammary epithelial cells showed that Myc activation sensitized the cells to Tigecycline independently from any effect on cell proliferation. Finally, Tigecycline significantly retarded the progression of either mouse or human lymphomas in recipient mice, providing a therapeutic window in this pre-clinical setting.
We shall remark here that a previous attempt was made to address the response of Myc-overexpressing cells to Tigecycline by using the B-cell line P493-6 [23]. However, these cells are strictly dependent upon a Tetracycline-repressible c-myc transgene [42], which as shown here is also potently repressed by Tigecycline, rendering these experiments inconclusive. Thus, prior to our work, no other data had addressed the role of Myc in the sensitivity of tumor cells to Tigecycline. In line with our findings, however, inhibition of human mitochondrial peptide deformylase (HsPDF) blocked mitochondrial translation and induced apoptosis in a Myc-dependent manner in either P493-6 or Burkitt's lymphoma cells [48].
Oncogene-mediated metabolic reprogramming is considered a hallmark of cancer [49, 50]. Myc in particular, has been connected to the Warburg effect, in which cells switch from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis for ATP production [49, 51, 52]. Myc further modulates mitochondrial metabolism and biogenesis, in particular through the regulation of nuclear genes encoding mitochondrial proteins, either directly or through other factors such as PGC1ß and p32/C1QBP [47, 52]. Our data and those of Oran et al. [46] add a new essential link between Myc and mitochondria, showing that augmented expression of the mitochondrial genome - indirectly controlled by Myc itself - is critical for the fitness of Myc-driven tumor cells.
The mechanisms through which Myc sensitizes cells to inhibition of the mitochondrial biosynthetic apparatus remain to be unraveled. As the mitochondrial genome (or mtDNA) encodes 13 subunits of the ETC [53], the effect must be linked to electron transport. Increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by the ETC and the resulting DNA damage have been proposed to mediate the cytotoxicity of other antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, ampicillin and kanamycin) [54]. Oran et al. [46] observed that antioxidants partially rescue apoptosis upon treatment with either 2′CmeA or Tigecycline. However, unlike other antibiotics, neither tetracycline, nor Tigecycline appear to induce ROS directly [23, 54]. Hence, although they may contribute to overall cytotoxicity, ROS are unlikely to be direct effectors of Tigecycline in this setting.
ETC complexes also determine the electrochemical gradient required for the phosphorylation of ADP. Oxidative phosphorylation is indeed a major source of ATP in Myc-overexpressing cells [55, 56], although these cells may efficiently generate ATP through aerobic glycolysis [57, 58]. Consistent with the latter, we observed Tigecycline-induced cell death without decreased ATP levels. Thus, other functions of the ETC might conceivably contribute to Tigecycline sensitivity.
Besides ATP production, the mitochondrial electrochemical gradient regulates membrane permeability and protein import, which in turn control various biosynthetic pathways, including those for lipid precursors, nucleotides, amino acids and metalloproteins, with important consequences for cell growth and division [59-62]. ETC activity also regenerates NAD+ to fuel the biochemical reactions of the TCA cycle, and Myc overexpression in cancer cells has been proposed to redirect TCA intermediates from ATP production to the aforementioned biosynthetic pathways [52, 63]. Therefore, by suppressing the synthesis of mitochondrially-encoded ETC components, Tigecycline may limit the ability of Myc-overexpressing cells to derive essential macromolecular precursors.
Therapies based on inhibition of mitochondrial activities have been proposed for the treatment of human cancers [64, 65]. Since the 1980′s, numerous studies have shown that Tigecycline and other antibiotics are toxic to tumor cells, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy [22-24], although the genetic basis for this effect had remained unclear. Our data imply that activation of c-myc is one of the oncogenic lesions sensitizing tumors cells to the inhibition of mitochondrial translation. We also show that Tigecycline acts independently from p53, which is frequently mutated in Myc-driven hematological cancers [66, 67].
In conclusion, the identification of Myc as a determinant of Tigecycline sensitivity provides a new potential indicator for the re-purposing of this antibiotic in the clinic. Further investigations will assess whether this may be extended to other Myc-dependent tumor types and whether Tigecycline may show synergy with current therapeutic agents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines and cultures
Eμ-myc lymphoma cells were derived from tumor lymph-nodes of either Eμ-myc or Eμ-myc; p53+/− mice and maintained in vitro in a 50:50 mixture of DMEM (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium) and IMDM (Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium), 10% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 50 μM ß-mercaptoethanol and non-essential amino acids (NEAA). The status or p53-proficient lymphomas was confirmed by immunoblot analysis of p53 accumulation upon Adriamycin treatment. All experiments were performed in triplicates on a p53 wild-type (LY27) and a p53 null (LY35) lymphoma. Unless otherwise specified all experiments shown in main and supplementary figures were performed on LY27. Mammary epithelial cells (MMECs) were derived from the mammary gland of 6 weeks old Rosa26-MycER knock-in mice (R26-MERT2) [44] and were immortalized by simultaneous knock-down of p53 and pRb [68]. Cells were maintained in vitro in a 50:50 mixture of DMEM and F12 media supplemented with 5% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 20ng/mL hEGF, 4μg/μL Heparin, 50ng/mL cholera toxin, 0.5 μg/mL hydrocortisone, 5μg/mL insulin, 10mM HEPES. Ba/F3 cells were mantained in vitro in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 5% WEHI-3B conditioned medium (as a source of IL-3). Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Raji, Daudi and Namalwa) or MEM (Ramos) supplemented with 10% FBS, 2mM L-glutamine, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1mM Sodium Pyruvate, 10mM HEPES. All cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified air atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2.
For drug treatment experiments Tigecycline (Sequoia Research Products) and 2′-C-Methyladenosine (Santa Cruz) were dissolved in DMSO. When needed, dilution were prepared fresh from stock solution in DMSO and added directly to the culture medium. Ethidium Bromide (Sigma) was diluted in water and added to the culture medium at a final concentration of 50ng/ml.
shRNA library screen
To generate the shRNA library, we selected 241 candidate genes that were induced in Eμ-myc lymphomas and MycER-expressing fibroblasts [8 and unpublished data] and cloned them into the miR30-based LMS vector. See supplementary methods for a detailed explanation of the procedure.
Immunoblot analysis and antibodies
5 to 10×106 cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (50mM Tris-cl pH7.6, 1%NP40, 1% deoxycholic acid, 0.1% SDS, 1mM EDTA, 150mM NaCl) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche), sonicated in a water bath sonicator and cleared by centrifugation at 13000xg. 30 μg of cleared lysates were electrophoresed on SDS-PAGE gels and immunoblotted with the following primary antibodies: mouse monoclonal anti-Complex I subunit NDUFB8 (Invitrogen, cat. #459210); mouse monoclonal anti-Complex III subunit UQCRC2 (Abcam, cat. #ab14745); rabbit polyclonal anti-VDAC (Pierce, cat. #PA1-954A); mouse monoclonal anti-MT-COI (MitoScience, cat. #1D6E1A8); mouse monoclonal anti-SDHA (Invitrogen, cat. #459200); mouse monoclonal anti COX IV (Abcam, cat. #ab33985); rabbit monoclonal anti-c-Myc Y69 (Abcam, cat. #GR144732-28); mouse monoclonal anti-vinculin (Abcam, cat. #ab18058). After incubation of the membranes with appropriate secondary antibodies, chemiluminescent detection was done through a CCD camera using the ChemiDoc System (Bio-Rad). Quantification of protein levels was done using the Image Lab software.
RNA extraction and analysis
Total RNA was purified using the Maxwell LEV simplyRNA Purification Kit (Promega), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was produced using the reverse-transcriptase ImPromII (Promega). A total of 10 ng of cDNA was used for real-time PCR reactions with FAST SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). See Table S7 for the full list of primers.
Quantification of mitochondrial DNA
Quantification of mtDNA was performed with real-time PCR reactions using FAST SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) and 50ng of total DNA. The following primers were used: CoxI_fw (5′- TCG GAG CCC CAG ATA TAG CA −3′) and CoxI_rv (5′ -TTT CCG GCT AGA GGT GGG TA −3′). Data were normalized to the amount of nuclear DNA as measured with the following primers: Rplp0_fw (5′ -TTC ATT GTG GGA GCA GAC- 3′) and Rplp0_rvCAG CAG TTT CTC CAG AGC- 3′).
Cell growth and apoptosis assays
In all experiments, cell growth was assessed by either trypan blue exclusion with an automated cell counter (TC20™, Bio-rad) or the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega), following manufacturer's instructions. Doubling time (DT) was calculated from the the growth curves using the formula DT = T ln2/ln(Xe/Xb), where T = time interval, Xe = final number of cells, Xb = initial number of cells.
Caspase activity was evaluated with the Caspase-Glo® 3/7 Assay (Promega), following manufacturer's instructions. For AnnexinV staining, 5×105 cells were washed once with Annexin buffer (10mM HEPES, 140mM NaCl, 2.5mM CaCl2) and stained in 50 μL annexin buffer plus AnnexinV-APC antibody (BD biosciences), for 1 hour at RT in the dark. Cells were then washed with Annexin buffer and resuspended in 500μL PBS+50μg/mL PI. The fluorescent signal was acquired immediately after staining on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD biosciences).
Oxygen consumption rate, ATP and mitochondrial membrane potential measurement
Oxygen consumption of cultivated cells was determined by polarographic analysis using a Clark type Hansateck Oxygraph in 1 ml chamber. Basal respiration rate was determined for 1×107 cells resuspended in fresh medium. For data normalization protein concentration was measured using the DC protein assay (Biorad). ATP was measured from equal amount of cells with the CellTiter-Glo® Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega), following manufacturer's instructions. Mitochondrial membrane potential was determined by staining with the cationic cyanine dye DilC1(5) (Invitrogen). Briefly, cells were treated with 50 nM DiIC1(5) in PBS and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2, for 20 minutes. Cells were then washed once with PBS, resuspended in 500 μL PBS, and fluorescence was acquired immediately analyzed on the FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD biosciences) with 633 nm excitation laser.
Histology and immunohistochemical staining
Samples for histological analysis were fixed in 4%PFA overnight at 4°C immediately after collection from the animals. For immunohistochemistry analysis, 5 μm sections were de-waxed and re-hydrated through an ethanol scale, heated in citrate solution (BioGenex #HK086-9K) in a water bath at 99°C for 30 minutes for antigen unmasking, washed once in water and treated with 3% H2O2 for quenching of endogenous peroxidases. Slides were incubated with antibody against Ki-67 (#M7249 Dako, 1:500) or Cleaved Caspase-3 (#9661 Cell Signaling, 1:200), in a blocking solution (2% BSA, 2% goat serum, 0.02% Tween20, in TBS 1x) for 3h at RT. After primary incubation, slides were washed twice with TBS 1x, and incubate with the secondary antibody (DAKO Cytomation Envision System Labelled Polymer-HRP) for 45 minutes. After 2 washes with TBS, the signal was revealed with a DAB peroxidase substrate solution (DAKO) for 2-10 minutes. Slides were finally counterstained with hematoxylin, de-hydrated through alcoholic scale and mounted with Eukitt (Bio-Optica).
Assessment of tigecycline activity in mouse lymphomas models
Experiments involving animals have been done in accordance with the Italian Laws (D.lgs. 26/2014), which enforces Dir. 2010/63/EU (Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes). See supplementary methods for a detailed explanation of the experimental procedures.
Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as mean and standard deviation (s.d.) or standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) to account for variation among experimental measures. Statistical analyses were performed by unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Statistical evaluation of survival curves was performed using the logrank (Mantel-Cox) test.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS TABLES AND FIGURES
Acknowledgments
We thank Salvatore Bianchi, Luca Rotta and Thelma Capra for assistance with the Illumina HiSeq platform, Federica Pisati for the preparation of histological samples, Theresia Kress and Micol Ravà for insightful comments and discussions.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors do not declare potential conflicts of interest.
GRANT SUPPORT
A. D'Andrea was supported by a post-doctoral fellowship from the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi. This work was supported by grants from the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (MODHEP consortium), the European Research Council, the Italian Health Ministry and the Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC) to BA.
REFERENCES
- 1.Choi PS, van Riggelen J, Gentles AJ, Bachireddy P, Rakhra K, Adam SJ, Plevritis SK, Felsher DW. Lymphomas that recur after MYC suppression continue to exhibit oncogene addiction. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:17432–17437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107303108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Felsher DW. MYC Inactivation Elicits Oncogene Addiction through Both Tumor Cell-Intrinsic and Host-Dependent Mechanisms. Genes Cancer. 2010;1:597–604. doi: 10.1177/1947601910377798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Soucek L, Whitfield JR, Sodir NM, Masso-Valles D, Serrano E, Karnezis AN, Swigart LB, Evan GI. Inhibition of Myc family proteins eradicates KRas-driven lung cancer in mice. Genes & development. 2013;27:504–513. doi: 10.1101/gad.205542.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sansom OJ, Meniel VS, Muncan V, Phesse TJ, Wilkins JA, Reed KR, Vass JK, Athineos D, Clevers H, Clarke AR. Myc deletion rescues Apc deficiency in the small intestine. Nature. 2007;446:676–679. doi: 10.1038/nature05674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tansey WP. Mammalian MYC Proteins and Cancer. New Journal of Science. 2014;2014:27. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kress TR, Saboò A, Amati B. MYC: connecting selective transcriptional control to global RNA production. Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15:593–607. doi: 10.1038/nrc3984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dang CV. MYC on the Path to Cancer. Cell. 2012;149:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sabò A, Kress TR, Pelizzola M, de Pretis S, Gorski MM, Tesi A, Morelli MJ, Bora P, Doni M, Verrecchia A, Tonelli C, Faga G, Bianchi V, Ronchi A, Low D, Muller H, et al. Selective transcriptional regulation by Myc in cellular growth control and lymphomagenesis. Nature. 2014;511:488–492. doi: 10.1038/nature13537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walz S, Lorenzin F, Morton J, Wiese KE, von Eyss B, Herold S, Rycak L, Dumay-Odelot H, Karim S, Bartkuhn M, Roels F, Wustefeld T, Fischer M, Teichmann M, Zender L, Wei CL, et al. Activation and repression by oncogenic MYC shape tumour-specific gene expression profiles. Nature. 2014;511:483–487. doi: 10.1038/nature13473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meacham CE, Ho EE, Dubrovsky E, Gertler FB, Hemann MT. In vivo RNAi screening identifies regulators of actin dynamics as key determinants of lymphoma progression. Nature genetics. 2009;41:1133–1137. doi: 10.1038/ng.451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mills JR, Malina A, Lee T, Di Paola D, Larsson O, Miething C, Grosse F, Tang H, Zannis-Hadjopoulos M, Lowe SW, Pelletier J. RNAi screening uncovers Dhx9 as a modifier of ABT-737 resistance in an Emu-myc/Bcl-2 mouse model. Blood. 2013;121:3402–3412. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-06-434365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cermelli S, Jang IS, Bernard B, Grandori C. Synthetic lethal screens as a means to understand and treat MYC-driven cancers. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2014. p. 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 13.Huang CH, Lujambio A, Zuber J, Tschaharganeh DF, Doran MG, Evans MJ, Kitzing T, Zhu N, de Stanchina E, Sawyers CL, Armstrong SA, Lewis JS, Sherr CJ, Lowe SW. CDK9-mediated transcription elongation is required for MYC addiction in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes & development. 2014;28:1800–1814. doi: 10.1101/gad.244368.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hsu TY, Simon LM, Neill NJ, Marcotte R, Sayad A, Bland CS, Echeverria GV, Sun T, Kurley SJ, Tyagi S, Karlin KL, Dominguez-Vidana R, Hartman JD, Renwick A, Scorsone K, Bernardi RJ, et al. The spliceosome is a therapeutic vulnerability in MYC-driven cancer. Nature. 2015;525:384–388. doi: 10.1038/nature14985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Nilsson JA, Keller UB, Baudino TA, Yang C, Norton S, Old JA, Nilsson LM, Neale G, Kramer DL, Porter CW, Cleveland JL. Targeting ornithine decarboxylase in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis prevents tumor formation. Cancer cell. 2005;7:433–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Koh CM, Bezzi M, Low DH, Ang WX, Teo SX, Gay FP, Al-Haddawi M, Tan SY, Osato M, Sabo A, Amati B, Wee KB, Guccione E. MYC regulates the core pre-mRNA splicing machinery as an essential step in lymphomagenesis. Nature. 2015;523:96–100. doi: 10.1038/nature14351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lin CJ, Nasr Z, Premsrirut PK, Porco JA, Jr, Hippo Y, Lowe SW, Pelletier J. Targeting synthetic lethal interactions between Myc and the eIF4F complex impedes tumorigenesis. Cell reports. 2012;1:325–333. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barna M, Pusic A, Zollo O, Costa M, Kondrashov N, Rego E, Rao PH, Ruggero D. Suppression of Myc oncogenic activity by ribosomal protein haploinsufficiency. Nature. 2008;456:971–975. doi: 10.1038/nature07449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cunningham JT, Moreno MV, Lodi A, Ronen SM, Ruggero D. Protein and nucleotide biosynthesis are coupled by a single rate-limiting enzyme, PRPS2, to drive cancer. Cell. 2014;157:1088–1103. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Davies SM, Rackham O, Shearwood AM, Hamilton KL, Narsai R, Whelan J, Filipovska A. Pentatricopeptide repeat domain protein 3 associates with the mitochondrial small ribosomal subunit and regulates translation. FEBS letters. 2009;583:1853–1858. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.04.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rackham O, Filipovska A. The role of mammalian PPR domain proteins in the regulation of mitochondrial gene expression. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2012;1819:1008–1016. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2011.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lamb R, Ozsvari B, Lisanti CL, Tanowitz HB, Howell A, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Antibiotics that target mitochondria effectively eradicate cancer stem cells, across multiple tumor types: Treating cancer like an infectious disease. Oncotarget. 2015;6:4569–4584. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Skrtic M, Sriskanthadevan S, Jhas B, Gebbia M, Wang X, Wang Z, Hurren R, Jitkova Y, Gronda M, Maclean N, Lai CK, Eberhard Y, Bartoszko J, Spagnuolo P, Rutledge AC, Datti A, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial translation as a therapeutic strategy for human acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer cell. 2011;20:674–688. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van den Bogert C, Dontje BH, Kroon AM. Doxycycline in combination chemotherapy of a rat leukemia. Cancer research. 1988;48:6686–6690. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Meacham CE, Lawton LN, Soto-Feliciano YM, Pritchard JR, Joughin BA, Ehrenberger T, Fenouille N, Zuber J, Williams RT, Young RA, Hemann MT. A genome-scale in vivo loss-of-function screen identifies Phf6 as a lineage-specific regulator of leukemia cell growth. Genes & development. 2015;29:483–488. doi: 10.1101/gad.254151.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Zuber J, Shi JW, Wang E, Rappaport AR, Herrmann H, Sison EA, Magoon D, Qi J, Blatt K, Wunderlich M, Taylor MJ, Johns C, Chicas A, Mulloy JC, Kogan SC, Brown P, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2011;478:524–U124. doi: 10.1038/nature10334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Davies SM, Lopez Sanchez MI, Narsai R, Shearwood AM, Razif MF, Small ID, Whelan J, Rackham O, Filipovska A. MRPS27 is a pentatricopeptide repeat domain protein required for the translation of mitochondrially encoded proteins. FEBS letters. 2012;586:3555–3561. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2012.07.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Galati D, Srinivasan S, Raza H, Prabu SK, Hardy M, Chandran K, Lopez M, Kalyanaraman B, Avadhani NG. Role of nuclear-encoded subunit Vb in the assembly and stability of cytochrome c oxidase complex: implications in mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production. The Biochemical journal. 2009;420:439–449. doi: 10.1042/BJ20090214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cecchini G. Function and structure of complex II of the respiratory chain. Annu Rev Biochem. 2003;72:77–109. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Surovtseva YV, Shutt TE, Cotney J, Cimen H, Chen SY, Koc EC, Shadel GS. Mitochondrial ribosomal protein L12 selectively associates with human mitochondrial RNA polymerase to activate transcription. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:17921–17926. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108852108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.de Vries H, Arendzen AJ, Kroon AM. The interference of the macrolide antibiotics with mitochondrial protein synthesis. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1973;331:264–275. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90439-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ibrahim NG, Beattie DS. Protein synthesis on ribosomes isolated from rat liver mitochondria: sensitivity to erythromycin. FEBS letters. 1973;36:102–104. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(73)80347-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Denslow ND, O'Brien TW. Antibiotic susceptibility of the peptidyl transferase locus of bovine mitochondrial ribosomes. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS. 1978;91:441–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12696.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McKee EE, Ferguson M, Bentley AT, Marks TA. Inhibition of mammalian mitochondrial protein synthesis by oxazolidinones. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2006;50:2042–2049. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01411-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu Y, Lai LT, Gabrilove JL, Scheinberg DA. Antitumor activity of actinonin in vitro and in vivo. Clinical cancer research. 1998;4:171–176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tang C, Yang L, Jiang X, Xu C, Wang M, Wang Q, Zhou Z, Xiang Z, Cui H. Antibiotic drug tigecycline inhibited cell proliferation and induced autophagy in gastric cancer cells. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 2014;446:105–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ren A, Qiu Y, Cui H, Fu G. Tigecycline exerts an antitumoral effect in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral diseases. 2015;21:558–564. doi: 10.1111/odi.12311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Olson MW, Ruzin A, Feyfant E, Rush TS, 3rd, O'Connell J, Bradford PA. Functional, biophysical, and structural bases for antibacterial activity of tigecycline. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 2006;50:2156–2166. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01499-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chrzanowska-Lightowlers ZM, Preiss T, Lightowlers RN. Inhibition of mitochondrial protein synthesis promotes increased stability of nuclear-encoded respiratory gene transcripts. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1994;269:27322–27328. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Arnold JJ, Sharma SD, Feng JY, Ray AS, Smidansky ED, Kireeva ML, Cho A, Perry J, Vela JE, Park Y, Xu Y, Tian Y, Babusis D, Barauskus O, Peterson BR, Gnatt A, et al. Sensitivity of mitochondrial transcription and resistance of RNA polymerase II dependent nuclear transcription to antiviral ribonucleosides. PLoS pathogens. 2012;8:e1003030. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Palacios R, Henson G, Steinmetz M, McKearn JP. Interleukin-3 supports growth of mouse pre-B-cell clones in vitro. Nature. 1984;309:126–131. doi: 10.1038/309126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pajic A, Spitkovsky D, Christoph B, Kempkes B, Schuhmacher M, Staege MS, Brielmeier M, Ellwart J, Kohlhuber F, Bornkamm GW, Polack A, Eick D. Cell cycle activation by c-myc in a burkitt lymphoma model cell line. Int J Cancer. 2000;87:787–793. doi: 10.1002/1097-0215(20000915)87:6<787::aid-ijc4>3.0.co;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Krueger C, Pfleiderer K, Hillen W, Berens C. Tetracycline derivatives: alternative effectors for Tet transregulators. Biotechniques. 2004;37:546, 548, 550. doi: 10.2144/04374BM04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Murphy DJ, Junttila MR, Pouyet L, Karnezis A, Shchors K, Bui DA, Brown-Swigart L, Johnson L, Evan GI. Distinct thresholds govern Myc's biological output in vivo. Cancer cell. 2008;14:447–457. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Littlewood TD, Hancock DC, Danielian PS, Parker MG, Evan GI. A modified oestrogen receptor ligand-binding domain as an improved switch for the regulation of heterologous proteins. Nucleic acids research. 1995;23:1686–1690. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.10.1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Oran AR, Adams CM, Zhang X-y, Gennaro VJ, Pfeiffer HK, Seidel HE, Mascioli K, Kaplan J, Gaballa MR, Shen C, Rigoutsos I, King MP, Cotney J, Arnold JJ, Sharma SD, Vakoc CR, et al. Multi-focal control of mitochondrial gene expression by oncogenic MYC provides potential therapeutic targets in cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:72395–72414. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Morrish F, Hockenbery D. MYC and mitochondrial biogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2014. p. 4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Sheth A, Escobar-Alvarez S, Gardner J, Ran L, Heaney ML, Scheinberg DA. Inhibition of human mitochondrial peptide deformylase causes apoptosis in c-myc-overexpressing hematopoietic cancers. Cell death & disease. 2014;5:e1152. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cantor JR, Sabatini DM. Cancer Cell Metabolism: One Hallmark, Many Faces. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:881–898. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-12-0345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shim H, Dolde C, Lewis BC, Wu CS, Dang G, Jungmann RA, Dalla-Favera R, Dang CV. c-Myc transactivation of LDH-A: implications for tumor metabolism and growth. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:6658–6663. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dang CV. MYC, metabolism, cell growth, and tumorigenesis. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine. 2013. p. 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 53.Mercer TR, Neph S, Dinger ME, Crawford J, Smith MA, Shearwood AM, Haugen E, Bracken CP, Rackham O, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Filipovska A, Mattick JS. The human mitochondrial transcriptome. Cell. 2011;146:645–658. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kalghatgi S, Spina CS, Costello JC, Liesa M, Morones-Ramirez JR, Slomovic S, Molina A, Shirihai OS, Collins JJ. Bactericidal antibiotics induce mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in Mammalian cells. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5:192ra185. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Bellance N, Pabst L, Allen G, Rossignol R, Nagrath D. Oncosecretomics coupled to bioenergetics identifies alpha-amino adipic acid, isoleucine and GABA as potential biomarkers of cancer: Differential expression of c-Myc, Oct1 and KLF4 coordinates metabolic changes. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2012;1817:2060–2071. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Benard G, Bellance N, Jose C, Melser S, Nouette-Gaulain K, Rossignol R. Multi-site control and regulation of mitochondrial energy production. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2010;1797:698–709. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.02.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Koppenol WH, Bounds PL, Dang CV. Otto Warburg's contributions to current concepts of cancer metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:325–337. doi: 10.1038/nrc3038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Graves JA, Wang Y, Sims-Lucas S, Cherok E, Rothermund K, Branca MF, Elster J, Beer-Stolz D, Van Houten B, Vockley J, Prochownik EV. Mitochondrial structure, function and dynamics are temporally controlled by c-Myc. PloS one. 2012;7:e37699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wallace DC. Mitochondria and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:685–698. doi: 10.1038/nrc3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Evans DR, Guy HI. Mammalian pyrimidine biosynthesis: fresh insights into an ancient pathway. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2004;279:33035–33038. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R400007200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Birsoy K, Wang T, Chen WW, Freinkman E, Abu-Remaileh M, Sabatini DM. An Essential Role of the Mitochondrial Electron Transport Chain in Cell Proliferation Is to Enable Aspartate Synthesis. Cell. 2015;162:540–551. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Sullivan LB, Gui DY, Hosios AM, Bush LN, Freinkman E, Vander Heiden MG. Supporting Aspartate Biosynthesis Is an Essential Function of Respiration in Proliferating Cells. Cell. 2015;162:552–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even warburg did not anticipate. Cancer cell. 2012;21:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Weinberg SE, Chandel NS. Targeting mitochondria metabolism for cancer therapy. Nat Chem Biol. 2015;11:9–15. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wolf DA. Is Reliance on Mitochondrial Respiration a “Chink in the Armor” of Therapy-Resistant Cancer? Cancer cell. 2014;26:788–795. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Saha MN, Qiu L, Chang H. Targeting p53 by small molecules in hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2013;6:23. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schmitz R, Young RM, Ceribelli M, Jhavar S, Xiao W, Zhang M, Wright G, Shaffer AL, Hodson DJ, Buras E, Liu X, Powell J, Yang Y, Xu W, Zhao H, Kohlhammer H, et al. Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics. Nature. 2012;490:116–120. doi: 10.1038/nature11378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Elenbaas B, Spirio L, Koerner F, Fleming MD, Zimonjic DB, Donaher JL, Popescu NC, Hahn WC, Weinberg RA. Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells. Genes & development. 2001;15:50–65. doi: 10.1101/gad.828901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.